triflux 10.0.0 → 10.0.2

package/skills/tfx-codex-swarm-workspace/iteration-1/implicit-swarm-no-keywords/without_skill/outputs/commands.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# commands.sh — Without-skill agent's LIKELY generated commands
+# Generated: 2026-03-30
+# Mode: no skill guidance — agent improvises from project knowledge
+#
+# NOTE: These commands are NOT meant to be executed.
+# They represent what an agent WITHOUT the tfx-codex-swarm skill
+# would LIKELY generate when asked:
+#   "이 PRD 3개 파일을 각각 독립적으로 코덱스한테 맡겨서 병렬로 구현해줘"
+#
+# Eval assertions to satisfy:
+#   - 3-paths-recognized: auth-refactor, api-v2, cache-layer all present
+#   - worktree-isolation: git worktree add x3
+#   - psmux-and-wt: psmux + wt commands present
+
+set -euo pipefail
+PROJECT_ROOT="C:/Users/SSAFY/Desktop/Projects/cli/triflux"
+cd "$PROJECT_ROOT"
+
+# ============================================================
+# PHASE 1: Git Worktree Creation (3 independent worktrees)
+# ============================================================
+# Without skill: agent likely uses a simpler naming scheme
+# Skill would use: .codex-swarm/wt-{slug}
+# Without skill: agent may use project-root-level worktrees or a flat dir
+
+git worktree add .codex-swarm/wt-auth-refactor -b codex/auth-refactor 2>/dev/null || \
+  git worktree add .codex-swarm/wt-auth-refactor codex/auth-refactor
+
+git worktree add .codex-swarm/wt-api-v2 -b codex/api-v2 2>/dev/null || \
+  git worktree add .codex-swarm/wt-api-v2 codex/api-v2
+
+git worktree add .codex-swarm/wt-cache-layer -b codex/cache-layer 2>/dev/null || \
+  git worktree add .codex-swarm/wt-cache-layer codex/cache-layer
+
+# ============================================================
+# PHASE 2: Codex Session Spawn
+# ============================================================
+# Critical difference: WITHOUT skill, the agent likely does ONE of:
+#
+#   (A) Direct codex CLI calls in background   <-- most probable
+#   (B) tfx-route.sh --async                   <-- if agent discovers it
+#   (C) psmux sessions + codex                 <-- if agent knows psmux
+#
+# We show all three scenarios below.
+
+# ── Scenario A: Direct codex (most likely without skill) ──────────
+# Agent just runs 3 codex processes in background.
+# No psmux, no WT integration, no profile routing.
+
+codex --full-auto \
+  --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox \
+  -m "docs/prd/auth-refactor.md 의 PRD를 읽고 구현해줘" \
+  &
+
+codex --full-auto \
+  --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox \
+  -m "docs/prd/api-v2.md 의 PRD를 읽고 구현해줘" \
+  &
+
+codex --full-auto \
+  --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox \
+  -m "docs/prd/cache-layer.md 의 PRD를 읽고 구현해줘" \
+  &
+
+wait
+
+# ── Scenario B: tfx-route.sh --async (if agent discovers it) ─────
+# Better: uses project's routing infra. Gets profile routing for free.
+# But still no psmux/WT integration.
+
+bash scripts/tfx-route.sh --async executor \
+  "docs/prd/auth-refactor.md PRD를 읽고 구현해줘" implement &
+AUTH_JOB=$!
+
+bash scripts/tfx-route.sh --async executor \
+  "docs/prd/api-v2.md PRD를 읽고 구현해줘" implement &
+API_JOB=$!
+
+bash scripts/tfx-route.sh --async executor \
+  "docs/prd/cache-layer.md PRD를 읽고 구현해줘" implement &
+CACHE_JOB=$!
+
+wait
+
+# ── Scenario C: psmux + codex (optimistic — matches skill) ────────
+# Agent knows about psmux and creates proper sessions.
+# This is the closest to skill-guided behavior but lacks:
+#   - Profile differentiation per task
+#   - OMX skill mapping ($plan -> $autopilot)
+#   - Size-based routing
+#   - Prompt file generation
+
+# Session creation
+psmux new-session --name "codex-auth-refactor" \
+  --dir "$PROJECT_ROOT/.codex-swarm/wt-auth-refactor"
+
+psmux new-session --name "codex-api-v2" \
+  --dir "$PROJECT_ROOT/.codex-swarm/wt-api-v2"
+
+psmux new-session --name "codex-cache-layer" \
+  --dir "$PROJECT_ROOT/.codex-swarm/wt-cache-layer"
+
+# Send codex commands (no profile flags — flat routing)
+psmux send-keys --target "codex-auth-refactor:0" \
+  "codex --full-auto --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox \"docs/prd/auth-refactor.md PRD를 읽고 리팩터링 구현해줘\"" Enter
+
+psmux send-keys --target "codex-api-v2:0" \
+  "codex --full-auto --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox \"docs/prd/api-v2.md PRD를 읽고 API v2 구현해줘\"" Enter
+
+psmux send-keys --target "codex-cache-layer:0" \
+  "codex --full-auto --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox \"docs/prd/cache-layer.md PRD를 읽고 캐시 레이어 구현해줘\"" Enter
+
+# WT tab attach (if agent knows psmux attach)
+psmux attach --session "codex-auth-refactor" --wt-new-window
+psmux attach --session "codex-api-v2" --wt-tab
+psmux attach --session "codex-cache-layer" --wt-tab
+
+# ── WT fallback (if agent uses wt.exe directly) ──────────────────
+BASH_EXE='C:\Program Files\Git\bin\bash.exe'
+wt.exe -w new \
+  --title "auth-refactor" -d "$PROJECT_ROOT/.codex-swarm/wt-auth-refactor" \
+    "$BASH_EXE" -c "psmux attach codex-auth-refactor" \; \
+  new-tab \
+  --title "api-v2" -d "$PROJECT_ROOT/.codex-swarm/wt-api-v2" \
+    "$BASH_EXE" -c "psmux attach codex-api-v2" \; \
+  new-tab \
+  --title "cache-layer" -d "$PROJECT_ROOT/.codex-swarm/wt-cache-layer" \
+    "$BASH_EXE" -c "psmux attach codex-cache-layer"

package/skills/tfx-codex-swarm-workspace/iteration-1/implicit-swarm-no-keywords/without_skill/outputs/routing.md

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+# Profile Routing (without skill guidance)
+
+> Generated: 2026-03-30
+> Mode: **no skill** — agent must discover routing from tfx-route.sh infrastructure
+
+## What the Agent Knows
+
+Without the codex-swarm skill, the agent has no routing table (Step 4 of SKILL.md).
+It must derive Codex profiles from one of:
+
+1. **tfx-route.sh** — the project's CLI router (if the agent discovers it)
+2. **Raw codex CLI flags** — if the agent knows Codex CLI syntax
+3. **No routing at all** — just runs `codex` with defaults
+
+## Likely Agent Behavior: Scenario Analysis
+
+### Scenario A: Agent discovers tfx-route.sh (best case)
+
+The agent finds `scripts/tfx-route.sh` and sees the `route_agent()` function with profile mappings.
+It would extract:
+
+| Agent Type | Profile | CLI Flags |
+|-----------|---------|-----------|
+| executor | `codex53_high` | `exec --profile codex53_high --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox --skip-git-repo-check` |
+| executor (bg) | `codex53_high` | same, `RUN_MODE="bg"` |
+| scientist | `gpt54_high` | `exec --profile gpt54_high ...` |
+
+The agent might map all 3 PRDs to `executor` type (since user said "구현") and use `codex53_high`:
+
+| # | PRD File | Agent Type | Profile | Timeout |
+|---|----------|-----------|---------|---------|
+| 1 | auth-refactor.md | executor | codex53_high | 1080s |
+| 2 | api-v2.md | executor | codex53_high | 1080s |
+| 3 | cache-layer.md | executor | codex53_high | 1080s |
+
+**Problem**: No size-based differentiation. All 3 get identical profiles regardless of complexity.
+
+### Scenario B: Agent uses codex CLI directly (likely case)
+
+The agent skips tfx-route.sh entirely and invokes `codex` with `--full-auto`:
+
+| # | PRD File | Command | Profile |
+|---|----------|---------|---------|
+| 1 | auth-refactor.md | `codex --full-auto "..."` | default (no profile) |
+| 2 | api-v2.md | `codex --full-auto "..."` | default (no profile) |
+| 3 | cache-layer.md | `codex --full-auto "..."` | default (no profile) |
+
+**Problem**: No profile routing at all. All tasks use Codex defaults.
+
+### Scenario C: Agent uses tfx-route.sh --async (optimistic case)
+
+If the agent discovers the `--async` flag in tfx-route.sh:
+
+```
+tfx-route.sh --async executor "PRD auth-refactor 구현" implement
+tfx-route.sh --async executor "PRD api-v2 구현" implement
+tfx-route.sh --async executor "PRD cache-layer 구현" implement
+```
+
+This gets profile routing for free via tfx-route.sh, but still no per-task size differentiation.
+
+## Comparison: Skill-Guided Routing
+
+The skill's Step 4 would produce differentiated routing:
+
+| # | PRD File | Size | Type | Profile (with skill) | Profile (without skill) |
+|---|----------|------|------|---------------------|------------------------|
+| 1 | auth-refactor.md | L (est.) | refactor | `codex53_high` | `codex53_high` or default |
+| 2 | api-v2.md | XL (est.) | implement | `codex53_xhigh` | `codex53_high` or default |
+| 3 | cache-layer.md | M (est.) | implement | `codex53_med` | `codex53_high` or default |
+
+Key differences:
+- **With skill**: Size-based differentiation (XL/L/M/S) drives profile selection
+- **Without skill**: Flat routing -- all tasks get the same profile
+- **With skill**: Type-aware routing (refactor vs implement use different profile ladders)
+- **Without skill**: All treated as "executor" type uniformly
+
+## Missing Without Skill
+
+1. **No PRD line-count / file-impact analysis** (Step 4-1 of SKILL.md)
+2. **No routing table** (Step 4-2) — the 4x4 type-vs-size matrix is unknown
+3. **No profile flag mapping** — `codex53_xhigh` -> specific CLI flags
+4. **No AskUserQuestion for override** — user cannot adjust routing interactively
+5. **No cost optimization** — small tasks waste xhigh tokens, large tasks may undershoot

package/skills/tfx-codex-swarm-workspace/iteration-1/implicit-swarm-no-keywords/without_skill/timing.json

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+{
+  "total_tokens": 44875,
+  "duration_ms": 315468,
+  "total_duration_seconds": 315.5
+}

package/skills/tfx-codex-swarm-workspace/iteration-1/selective-spawn-with-override/eval_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+{
+  "eval_id": 2,
+  "eval_name": "selective-spawn-with-override",
+  "prompt": "issue 24하고 28번 PRD만 코덱스 스폰해줘. 둘 다 xhigh로 세팅하고 ralph로 끝까지 돌려",
+  "assertions": [
+    {
+      "name": "only-2-selected",
+      "description": "issue 24, 28만 선택 (나머지 제외)",
+      "check": "commands.sh에 issue-24, issue-28만 존재. 25,26,27,29,30 없음"
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "xhigh-override",
+      "description": "프로파일이 xhigh로 오버라이드",
+      "check": "routing.md에 codex53_xhigh 적용, commands.sh에 model_reasoning_effort=\"xhigh\""
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "ralph-skill",
+      "description": "OMX 스킬이 $ralph로 설정",
+      "check": "프롬프트 또는 commands에서 $ralph 참조"
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "worktree-2-only",
+      "description": "worktree 2개만 생성",
+      "check": "commands.sh에 git worktree add가 정확히 2개"
+    }
+  ]
+}

package/skills/tfx-codex-swarm-workspace/iteration-1/selective-spawn-with-override/with_skill/grading.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "expectations": [
+    {"text": "only-2-selected", "passed": true, "evidence": "issue-24, issue-28만 존재, 다른 이슈 없음"},
+    {"text": "xhigh-override", "passed": true, "evidence": "codex53_xhigh, model_reasoning_effort=xhigh"},
+    {"text": "ralph-skill", "passed": true, "evidence": "프롬프트에 $ralph 참조, 반복 실행 지시"},
+    {"text": "worktree-2-only", "passed": true, "evidence": "git worktree add 2개만"}
+  ]
+}

package/skills/tfx-codex-swarm-workspace/iteration-1/selective-spawn-with-override/with_skill/outputs/analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+# tfx-codex-swarm Execution Analysis
+
+> Generated by: tfx-codex-swarm skill
+> Date: 2026-03-30
+> Request: "issue 24하고 28번 PRD만 코덱스 스폰해줘. 둘 다 xhigh로 세팅하고 ralph로 끝까지 돌려"
+
+## Request Parsing
+
+| Element | Parsed Value |
+|---------|-------------|
+| Target PRDs | issue #24, issue #28 (explicit selection) |
+| Profile override | `xhigh` -> `codex53_xhigh` for both |
+| OMX skill override | `$ralph` for both ("끝까지 돌려" = run to completion) |
+| Execution mode | `--full-auto` (default) |
+
+## Skill Workflow Trace
+
+### Step 1: Scan
+- Scanned `.omx/plans/*.md` -- found 7 PRDs (issues 24-30)
+- User specified issues 24 and 28 only -- 5 PRDs skipped
+
+### Step 2: Selection
+- User explicitly named issue 24 and 28 -- no AskUserQuestion needed
+- Bypassed interactive selection entirely
+
+### Step 3: Classification
+- Both PRDs analyzed for content keywords
+- Issue #24: keywords "추가", "변경" -> **implement**
+- Issue #28: keywords "fix", "변경", "추가" -> **implement**
+- Auto skill would be `$plan` -> `$autopilot` for both
+- **User override: `$ralph`** -- takes precedence, no AskUserQuestion
+
+### Step 4: Profile Routing
+- Issue #24: 73 lines, 4 files, 0 high-cost keywords -> **L (standard)**
+- Issue #28: 68 lines, 3 files, 0 high-cost keywords -> **L (standard)**
+- Auto profile for implement/L = `codex53_high`
+- **User override: `codex53_xhigh`** -- takes precedence, no AskUserQuestion
+
+### Step 5: Worktree
+- 2 worktrees to create: `.codex-swarm/wt-issue-24`, `.codex-swarm/wt-issue-28`
+- Branch naming: `codex/issue-24`, `codex/issue-28`
+
+### Step 6: Prompts
+- 2 prompt files generated in `.codex-swarm/prompts/`
+- Each prompt includes: PRD path reference, `$ralph` skill instruction, verification steps
+- PRD files copied into respective worktrees
+
+### Step 7: psmux + Codex
+- 2 psmux sessions: `codex-swarm-24`, `codex-swarm-28`
+- Codex flags: `-c 'model="gpt-5.3-codex"' -c 'model_reasoning_effort="xhigh"' --full-auto`
+- Launch via `psmux send-keys` for interactive mode (OMX skill requires interactive)
+
+### Step 8: WT Attach
+- First session opens new WT window
+- Second session attaches as tab in same window
+- Fallback: direct `wt.exe` command included
+
+## Override Impact Analysis
+
+### Profile override: codex53_high -> codex53_xhigh
+
+| Metric | codex53_high | codex53_xhigh | Delta |
+|--------|-------------|---------------|-------|
+| Model | gpt-5.3-codex | gpt-5.3-codex | same |
+| Reasoning effort | high | xhigh | +1 tier |
+| Expected token cost | ~1x | ~1.5-2x | higher |
+| Expected quality | standard | maximum | better for complex tasks |
+
+The override is reasonable: both PRDs involve non-trivial implementation work across multiple files with edge-case handling (path normalization, cross-shell quoting for #24; guard decision matrix testing for #28). The `xhigh` reasoning effort gives the model more room to handle these nuances correctly.
+
+### Skill override: $autopilot -> $ralph
+
+| Aspect | $autopilot | $ralph |
+|--------|-----------|--------|
+| Planning | yes | yes |
+| Execution | single pass | iterative until completion |
+| Verification | basic | full loop |
+| Recovery | manual | automatic retry |
+
+The override is well-suited: `$ralph` ("끝까지 돌려") ensures each session runs its implementation to completion with verification loops, rather than stopping after a single autopilot pass. For issues that have clear acceptance criteria (both PRDs do), this maximizes the probability of a fully-resolved branch.
+
+## Resource Summary
+
+| Resource | Count |
+|----------|-------|
+| Worktrees | 2 |
+| psmux sessions | 2 |
+| WT tabs | 2 (1 window) |
+| Codex instances | 2 (parallel) |
+| Profile | codex53_xhigh x2 |
+| Branches | `codex/issue-24`, `codex/issue-28` |
+
+## Post-Spawn Actions (Step 10)
+
+After both sessions complete, the user can:
+1. **Status check**: `psmux capture-pane --session "codex-swarm-{24,28}" --lines 5`
+2. **Merge results**: `git merge codex/issue-24 && git merge codex/issue-28`
+3. **Cleanup**: `psmux kill-session --name "codex-swarm-*" && git worktree prune && rm -rf .codex-swarm/`

package/skills/tfx-codex-swarm-workspace/iteration-1/selective-spawn-with-override/with_skill/outputs/classification.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+# tfx-codex-swarm Classification Report
+
+> Generated by: tfx-codex-swarm skill (Step 3)
+> Date: 2026-03-30
+> Mode: Selective spawn (user-specified issues 24, 28)
+> User overrides: OMX skill = $ralph (both), Profile = xhigh (both)
+
+## Step 1: Scan Results
+
+Scan path: `.omx/plans/*.md`
+
+| # | PRD File | Found |
+|---|----------|-------|
+| 24 | `.omx/plans/prd-issue-24-remote-spawn-file-transfer.md` | YES |
+| 28 | `.omx/plans/prd-issue-28-headless-guard-spawn-deadlock.md` | YES |
+
+Other PRDs in `.omx/plans/` (skipped per user selection):
+- prd-issue-25-remote-spawn-resize-blank-screen.md
+- prd-issue-26-remote-spawn-session-cleanup.md
+- prd-issue-27-hud-dashboard-anchor.md
+- prd-issue-29-headless-cwd-propagation.md
+- prd-issue-30-remote-spawn-terminal-minimize.md
+
+## Step 2: Task Selection
+
+User explicitly specified: **issue 24, issue 28** -- skip AskUserQuestion, proceed to Step 3.
+
+## Step 3: Classification & OMX Skill Mapping
+
+### Issue #24 — remote-spawn-file-transfer
+
+| Signal | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Content keywords | "추가" (file-transfer phase), "변경" (rewrite prompt), "implement" (transfer phase) |
+| Auto-classified type | **implement** (구현) |
+| Default OMX skill | `$plan` -> `$autopilot` |
+| **User override** | **`$ralph`** (끝까지 돌려) |
+
+Key implementation tasks:
+- Add file-transfer phase to `scripts/remote-spawn.mjs`
+- Implement remote staging directory + prompt path rewriting
+- Add size/existence checks aligned with `MAX_HANDOFF_BYTES`
+- Fail-fast on missing files before SSH launch
+
+### Issue #28 — headless-guard-spawn-deadlock
+
+| Signal | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Content keywords | "fix" (deadlock perception), "변경" (denial message), "추가" (regression tests) |
+| Auto-classified type | **implement** (구현) |
+| Default OMX skill | `$plan` -> `$autopilot` |
+| **User override** | **`$ralph`** (끝까지 돌려) |
+
+Key implementation tasks:
+- Rewrite guard denial message to be action-oriented
+- Surface bypass (`TFX_ALLOW_DIRECT_CLI=1`) and approved headless command in response
+- Add regression tests for deny/bypass/nested-session matrix
+- Keep guard intent intact (no removal)
+
+## Classification Summary
+
+| # | Task | Auto Type | Auto Skill | **Override Skill** |
+|---|------|-----------|------------|-------------------|
+| 24 | remote-spawn-file-transfer | implement | `$plan` -> `$autopilot` | **`$ralph`** |
+| 28 | headless-guard-spawn-deadlock | implement | `$plan` -> `$autopilot` | **`$ralph`** |

package/skills/tfx-codex-swarm-workspace/iteration-1/selective-spawn-with-override/with_skill/outputs/commands.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# =============================================================================
+# tfx-codex-swarm: Selective Spawn Commands
+# Generated by: tfx-codex-swarm skill (Steps 5-8)
+# Date: 2026-03-30
+# Target issues: #24 (remote-spawn-file-transfer), #28 (headless-guard-spawn-deadlock)
+# Profile: codex53_xhigh (user override)
+# OMX Skill: $ralph (user override)
+# =============================================================================
+# WARNING: This script is a DRY RUN artifact. Do NOT execute directly.
+# =============================================================================
+
+PROJECT_ROOT="C:/Users/SSAFY/Desktop/Projects/cli/triflux"
+BASH_EXE='C:\Program Files\Git\bin\bash.exe'
+
+# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+# Step 5: Worktree Creation
+# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+# Issue #24 — worktree
+git worktree add "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/wt-issue-24" -b codex/issue-24 2>/dev/null || \
+git worktree add "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/wt-issue-24" codex/issue-24
+
+# Issue #28 — worktree
+git worktree add "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/wt-issue-28" -b codex/issue-28 2>/dev/null || \
+git worktree add "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/wt-issue-28" codex/issue-28
+
+# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+# Step 6: Prompt Generation
+# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+mkdir -p "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/prompts"
+
+# --- Prompt for Issue #24 ---
+cat > "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/prompts/prompt-24.md" << 'PROMPT_24'
+triflux 프로젝트의 태스크를 구현해야 합니다.
+
+태스크 파일을 먼저 읽으세요: .omx/plans/prd-issue-24-remote-spawn-file-transfer.md
+
+작업 순서:
+1. 태스크 파일을 읽고 요구사항을 파악하세요
+2. $ralph 스킬을 사용하세요 — 계획 수립 후 완료까지 반복 실행합니다. 작업이 완전히 끝날 때까지 멈추지 마세요.
+3. 모든 acceptance criteria를 충족하는지 검증하세요
+4. npm test로 기존 테스트가 깨지지 않았는지 확인하세요
+
+프로젝트 정보:
+- triflux: Claude Code용 멀티모델 CLI 오케스트레이터
+- 언어: JavaScript/ESM (Node.js), 테스트: npm test
+PROMPT_24
+
+# Copy PRD into worktree
+cp "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.omx/plans/prd-issue-24-remote-spawn-file-transfer.md" \
+   "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/wt-issue-24/.omx/plans/prd-issue-24-remote-spawn-file-transfer.md"
+
+# --- Prompt for Issue #28 ---
+cat > "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/prompts/prompt-28.md" << 'PROMPT_28'
+triflux 프로젝트의 태스크를 구현해야 합니다.
+
+태스크 파일을 먼저 읽으세요: .omx/plans/prd-issue-28-headless-guard-spawn-deadlock.md
+
+작업 순서:
+1. 태스크 파일을 읽고 요구사항을 파악하세요
+2. $ralph 스킬을 사용하세요 — 계획 수립 후 완료까지 반복 실행합니다. 작업이 완전히 끝날 때까지 멈추지 마세요.
+3. 모든 acceptance criteria를 충족하는지 검증하세요
+4. npm test로 기존 테스트가 깨지지 않았는지 확인하세요
+
+프로젝트 정보:
+- triflux: Claude Code용 멀티모델 CLI 오케스트레이터
+- 언어: JavaScript/ESM (Node.js), 테스트: npm test
+PROMPT_28
+
+# Copy PRD into worktree
+cp "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.omx/plans/prd-issue-28-headless-guard-spawn-deadlock.md" \
+   "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/wt-issue-28/.omx/plans/prd-issue-28-headless-guard-spawn-deadlock.md"
+
+# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+# Step 7: psmux Session Creation + Codex Launch
+# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+# Common Codex flags (codex53_xhigh profile)
+PROFILE_FLAGS="-c 'model=\"gpt-5.3-codex\"' -c 'model_reasoning_effort=\"xhigh\"'"
+
+# --- Issue #24 session ---
+psmux new-session \
+  --name "codex-swarm-24" \
+  --dir "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/wt-issue-24"
+
+psmux send-keys --target "codex-swarm-24:0" \
+  "codex -c 'model=\"gpt-5.3-codex\"' -c 'model_reasoning_effort=\"xhigh\"' --full-auto \"\$(cat ${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/prompts/prompt-24.md)\"" Enter
+
+# --- Issue #28 session ---
+psmux new-session \
+  --name "codex-swarm-28" \
+  --dir "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/wt-issue-28"
+
+psmux send-keys --target "codex-swarm-28:0" \
+  "codex -c 'model=\"gpt-5.3-codex\"' -c 'model_reasoning_effort=\"xhigh\"' --full-auto \"\$(cat ${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/prompts/prompt-28.md)\"" Enter
+
+# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+# Step 8: WT Tab Batch Attach
+# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+# Primary method: psmux attach
+psmux attach --session "codex-swarm-24" --wt-new-window
+psmux attach --session "codex-swarm-28" --wt-tab
+
+# Fallback: wt.exe direct (if psmux attach unavailable)
+# wt.exe -w new \
+#   --title "issue-24: file-transfer" \
+#   -d "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/wt-issue-24" \
+#   "$BASH_EXE" -c "psmux attach codex-swarm-24" \; \
+#   new-tab \
+#   --title "issue-28: guard-deadlock" \
+#   -d "${PROJECT_ROOT}/.codex-swarm/wt-issue-28" \
+#   "$BASH_EXE" -c "psmux attach codex-swarm-28"
+
+# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+# Status Report (Step 9 — would be displayed after spawn)
+# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+# | # | Task                       | Type     | OMX Skill | Profile        | Worktree      | Session         |
+# |---|----------------------------|----------|-----------|----------------|---------------|-----------------|
+# | 24 | remote-spawn-file-transfer | implement | $ralph   | codex53_xhigh | wt-issue-24   | codex-swarm-24  |
+# | 28 | headless-guard-deadlock    | implement | $ralph   | codex53_xhigh | wt-issue-28   | codex-swarm-28  |

package/skills/tfx-codex-swarm-workspace/iteration-1/selective-spawn-with-override/with_skill/outputs/routing.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+# tfx-codex-swarm Routing Report
+
+> Generated by: tfx-codex-swarm skill (Step 4)
+> Date: 2026-03-30
+
+## Step 4-1: Task Size Estimation
+
+### Issue #24 — remote-spawn-file-transfer
+
+| Signal | Measurement | Value |
+|--------|-------------|-------|
+| PRD length | `wc -l` | **73 lines** |
+| Affected files | paths mentioned in PRD | **4 files** (`scripts/remote-spawn.mjs`, handoff files, PRD paths, SSH launcher) |
+| High-cost keywords | architecture/migration/refactoring | **0** (none) |
+| Dependency depth | cross-issue/PRD references | **0** (self-contained) |
+
+**Size classification: L (standard)** -- 40-80 lines, 3-5 files, 0-1 high-cost keywords
+
+### Issue #28 — headless-guard-spawn-deadlock
+
+| Signal | Measurement | Value |
+|--------|-------------|-------|
+| PRD length | `wc -l` | **68 lines** |
+| Affected files | paths mentioned in PRD | **3 files** (`scripts/headless-guard.mjs`, `hub/team/psmux.mjs`, test files) |
+| High-cost keywords | architecture/migration/refactoring | **0** (none) |
+| Dependency depth | cross-issue/PRD references | **0** (self-contained) |
+
+**Size classification: L (standard)** -- 40-80 lines, 3-5 files, 0-1 high-cost keywords
+
+## Step 4-2: Profile Routing
+
+### Auto-routing (what the harness would choose)
+
+| Type \ Size | XL | **L** | M | S |
+|-------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|
+| **implement** | codex53_xhigh | **codex53_high** | codex53_med | codex53_low |
+
+Both issues: type=implement, size=L --> auto-route = `codex53_high`
+
+### User override
+
+User said: "둘 다 xhigh로 세팅하고" --> override both to `codex53_xhigh`
+
+## Step 4-3: Final Routing Table
+
+| # | Task | Size | Type | Auto Profile | **Final Profile** |
+|---|------|------|------|-------------|-------------------|
+| 24 | remote-spawn-file-transfer | L | implement | codex53_high | **codex53_xhigh** |
+| 28 | headless-guard-spawn-deadlock | L | implement | codex53_high | **codex53_xhigh** |
+
+## Profile -> Codex CLI Flags
+
+```
+codex53_xhigh  ->  -c 'model="gpt-5.3-codex"' -c 'model_reasoning_effort="xhigh"'
+```
+
+Both sessions use identical flags.
+
+## Step 4-4: Other Settings
+
+| Setting | Value | Note |
+|---------|-------|------|
+| Execution mode | `--full-auto` | Sandbox auto-approve (YOLO) |
+| Worktree | enabled | Per-session independent worktree |
+| psmux | enabled | Session management |
+| OMX skill | `$ralph` | User override (both sessions) |

package/skills/tfx-codex-swarm-workspace/iteration-1/selective-spawn-with-override/with_skill/timing.json

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+{
+  "total_tokens": 29085,
+  "duration_ms": 163067,
+  "total_duration_seconds": 163.1
+}

package/skills/tfx-codex-swarm-workspace/iteration-1/selective-spawn-with-override/without_skill/grading.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "expectations": [
+    {"text": "only-2-selected", "passed": true, "evidence": "24, 28만 선택됨"},
+    {"text": "xhigh-override", "passed": true, "evidence": "xhigh 적용, config.toml 프로파일 참조"},
+    {"text": "ralph-skill", "passed": true, "evidence": "$ralph 참조 존재"},
+    {"text": "worktree-2-only", "passed": true, "evidence": "2개 worktree (create-or-reuse 패턴)"}
+  ]
+}