tribunal-kit 4.5.0 → 4.6.0

package/.agent/skills/web-design-guidelines/SKILL.md

@@ -1,190 +1,194 @@
----
-name: web-design-guidelines
-description: Review UI code for Next-Generation Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".
-allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep
-version: 1.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-03-12
-applies-to-model: gemini-2.5-pro, claude-3-7-sonnet
----
-
-## Hallucination Traps (Read First)
-- ❌ Designing mobile-last (desktop first, then shrinking) -> ✅ Design mobile-first, then enhance for larger screens
-- ❌ Using more than 2-3 font families -> ✅ Stick to 1-2 font families maximum; more creates visual noise
-- ❌ Ignoring touch target sizes on mobile -> ✅ Minimum 44x44px touch targets (Apple HIG) / 48x48dp (Material Design)
-
----
-
-
-# Next-Gen Web Interface Review Guidelines (Pro-Max Level)
-
----
-
-## Review Trigger
-
-Load this skill when asked to:
-- Review or audit a UI
-- Check accessibility compliance (WCAG 3.0 / APCA)
-- Improve UX & Cognitive Safety
-- Check a site against best practices
-
----
-
-## Extreme Review Categories
-
-### 1. Neuro-Inclusivity & Accessibility (WCAG 3.0 APCA Base)
-
-Non-negotiable baseline for any public interface in 2026+:
-
-|Check|How to Verify|
-|---|---|
-|**APCA Contrast**|Ensure Lc (Lightness Contrast) is > 75 for body text, > 60 for large text. (Do not rely solely on old WCAG 2.1 4.5:1 math).|
-|**Cognitive Safety**|Check if `prefers-reduced-motion` is respected. No infinite spinning loaders.|
-|**Keyboard Fluidity**|Tab order must follow visual order. Focus states cannot be just a 1px dotted line; use `outline: 2px solid var(--focus-color); outline-offset: 2px;`.|
-|**Semantic AI Context**|Images must have `alt` tags, but complex charts need full `<details>` breakdowns for screen readers and AI agents crawling the site.|
-|**Interaction Buffers**|Are touch targets mathematically ≥48px (Fitts' Law)?|
-
-### 2. Extreme Core Web Vitals (CWV)
-
-Drop the old 2022 standards. The new baseline for premium web:
-
-|Metric|Premium Target|Common Failures|
-|---|---|---|
-|**LCP** (Largest Contentful Paint)|**< 1.5s**|Missing `fetchpriority="high"` on hero images. Heavy client-side React rendering blocking the paint.|
-|**INP** (Interaction to Next Paint)|**< 100ms**|Main thread blocked by React hydrate. Use `startTransition` or Web Workers for heavy JS.|
-|**CLS** (Cumulative Layout Shift)|**0.00**|Missing `width` and `height` on images. Late-loading web fonts (use `font-display: optional`).|
-
-### 3. Energy Efficiency & Sustainability
-
-Code has a carbon footprint and a battery cost.
-
-- **OLED Pure Black:** Does the dark mode use `#000` or `#010101` to physically turn off pixels?
-- **Animation Tax:** Are animations using CPU-heavy properties (`margin`, `width`) instead of GPU-accelerated ones (`transform`, `opacity`)?
-- **Asset Weight:** Are images AVIF/WebP? Are fonts subsetted Variable Fonts?
-
-### 4. Visual Design Quality (Pro-Max)
-
-Evaluate these brutally honestly:
-
-- **Mathematical Spacing:** Does spacing follow a strict scale (e.g., 4, 8, 16, 24, 32) or is it a mess of arbitrary pixels?
-- **Fluid Typography:** Is text using `clamp()` to scale, or does it awkwardly jump at breakpoints?
-- **The "Purple Ban":** Is the site heavily relying on deep purple/violet as a primary color? (Flag this as an overused AI-generated cliché).
-- **Z-Axis Depth:** Are shadows realistic (multi-layered CSS shadows) or flat and cheap (`box-shadow: 0 4px 6px #000`)?
-- **Micro-Interactions:** Do buttons scale down slightly on `:active`? Do elements use spring-physics easing (`cubic-bezier(0.34, 1.56, 0.64, 1)`)?
-
-### 5. AI & Streaming UX
-
-- **Zero-Wait States:** If the app is waiting for an LLM/Server response, does it show a static spinner (BAD) or stream the skeleton/content (GOOD)?
-- **Optimistic UI:** Do likes/saves update the UI *instantly* before the server confirms?
-
----
-
-## Common Review Findings
-
-|Finding|Severity|Fix|
-|---|---|---|
-|Missing/Weak focus styles|High|Add visible `:focus-visible` with offset|
-|`margin`/`padding` animated|High|Change to `transform: translate()`|
-|Touch targets under 48px|High|Increase padding/min-height|
-|Layout shifts on load (CLS > 0)|High|Pre-allocate space for async content/images|
-|Linear CSS transitions|Medium|Upgrade to spring-based `cubic-bezier` curves|
-|Purple as primary color|Low/Brand|Rethink palette — overused AI design cliché|
-
----
-
-## Audit Format Template
-
-When reporting a UI review, use this exact brutal structure:
-
-```markdown
-## UI/UX Pro-Max Review: [Component/Page Name]
-
-### ♿ Neuro-Inclusivity & A11y
-- [BLOCKER] [Finding with specific element and fix]
-- [WARN] [Finding]
-
-### ⚡ Performance & Energy (CWV)
-- [Finding]
-
-### 🎨 Visual & Spatial Quality
-- [Finding]
-
-### 🛠️ Interaction & Physics
-- [Finding]
-
-### Summary
-X blockers, Y warnings, Z suggestions.
-Recommended action before shipping: [specific steps]
-```
-
----
-
-## Output Format
-
-When this skill produces a recommendation or design decision, structure your output as:
-
-```
-━━━ Web Design Guidelines Recommendation ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-Decision:    [what was chosen / proposed]
-Rationale:   [why — one concise line]
-Trade-offs:  [what is consciously accepted]
-Next action: [concrete next step for the user]
-─────────────────────────────────────────────────
-Pre-Flight:  ✅ All checks passed
-             or ❌ [blocking item that must be resolved first]
-```
-
----
-
-
----
-
-
-
-AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
-
-1. **Over-engineering:** Proposing complex abstractions or distributed systems when a simpler approach suffices.
-2. **Hallucinated Libraries/Methods:** Using non-existent methods or packages. Always `// VERIFY` or check `package.json` / `requirements.txt`.
-3. **Skipping Edge Cases:** Writing the "happy path" and ignoring error handling, timeouts, or data validation.
-4. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-5. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or re-raising.
-
----
-
-
-
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
-
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-
-
-
-Review these questions before confirming output:
-```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
-```
-
-### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
-
-**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
-
-
-## Pre-Flight Checklist
-- [ ] Have I reviewed the user's specific constraints and requests?
-- [ ] Have I checked the environment for relevant existing implementations?
-
-## VBC Protocol (Verification-Before-Completion)
-You MUST verify existing code signatures and variables before attempting to modify or call them. No hallucination is permitted.
+---
+name: web-design-guidelines
+description: Review UI code for Next-Generation Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".
+allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep
+version: 1.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-03-12
+applies-to-model: gemini-2.5-pro, claude-3-7-sonnet
+routing:
+  domain: general
+  tier: basic
+---
+
+## Hallucination Traps (Read First)
+
+- ❌ Designing mobile-last (desktop first, then shrinking) -> ✅ Design mobile-first, then enhance for larger screens
+- ❌ Using more than 2-3 font families -> ✅ Stick to 1-2 font families maximum; more creates visual noise
+- ❌ Ignoring touch target sizes on mobile -> ✅ Minimum 44x44px touch targets (Apple HIG) / 48x48dp (Material Design)
+
+---
+
+# Next-Gen Web Interface Review Guidelines (Pro-Max Level)
+
+---
+
+## Review Trigger
+
+Load this skill when asked to:
+
+- Review or audit a UI
+- Check accessibility compliance (WCAG 3.0 / APCA)
+- Improve UX & Cognitive Safety
+- Check a site against best practices
+
+---
+
+## Extreme Review Categories
+
+### 1. Neuro-Inclusivity & Accessibility (WCAG 3.0 APCA Base)
+
+Non-negotiable baseline for any public interface in 2026+:
+
+| Check                   | How to Verify                                                                                                                                         |
+| ----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **APCA Contrast**       | Ensure Lc (Lightness Contrast) is > 75 for body text, > 60 for large text. (Do not rely solely on old WCAG 2.1 4.5:1 math).                           |
+| **Cognitive Safety**    | Check if `prefers-reduced-motion` is respected. No infinite spinning loaders.                                                                         |
+| **Keyboard Fluidity**   | Tab order must follow visual order. Focus states cannot be just a 1px dotted line; use `outline: 2px solid var(--focus-color); outline-offset: 2px;`. |
+| **Semantic AI Context** | Images must have `alt` tags, but complex charts need full `<details>` breakdowns for screen readers and AI agents crawling the site.                  |
+| **Interaction Buffers** | Are touch targets mathematically ≥48px (Fitts' Law)?                                                                                                  |
+
+### 2. Extreme Core Web Vitals (CWV)
+
+Drop the old 2022 standards. The new baseline for premium web:
+
+| Metric                              | Premium Target | Common Failures                                                                                      |
+| ----------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **LCP** (Largest Contentful Paint)  | **< 1.5s**     | Missing `fetchpriority="high"` on hero images. Heavy client-side React rendering blocking the paint. |
+| **INP** (Interaction to Next Paint) | **< 100ms**    | Main thread blocked by React hydrate. Use `startTransition` or Web Workers for heavy JS.             |
+| **CLS** (Cumulative Layout Shift)   | **0.00**       | Missing `width` and `height` on images. Late-loading web fonts (use `font-display: optional`).       |
+
+### 3. Energy Efficiency & Sustainability
+
+Code has a carbon footprint and a battery cost.
+
+- **OLED Pure Black:** Does the dark mode use `#000` or `#010101` to physically turn off pixels?
+- **Animation Tax:** Are animations using CPU-heavy properties (`margin`, `width`) instead of GPU-accelerated ones (`transform`, `opacity`)?
+- **Asset Weight:** Are images AVIF/WebP? Are fonts subsetted Variable Fonts?
+
+### 4. Visual Design Quality (Pro-Max)
+
+Evaluate these brutally honestly:
+
+- **Mathematical Spacing:** Does spacing follow a strict scale (e.g., 4, 8, 16, 24, 32) or is it a mess of arbitrary pixels?
+- **Fluid Typography:** Is text using `clamp()` to scale, or does it awkwardly jump at breakpoints?
+- **The "Purple Ban":** Is the site heavily relying on deep purple/violet as a primary color? (Flag this as an overused AI-generated cliché).
+- **Z-Axis Depth:** Are shadows realistic (multi-layered CSS shadows) or flat and cheap (`box-shadow: 0 4px 6px #000`)?
+- **Micro-Interactions:** Do buttons scale down slightly on `:active`? Do elements use spring-physics easing (`cubic-bezier(0.34, 1.56, 0.64, 1)`)?
+
+### 5. AI & Streaming UX
+
+- **Zero-Wait States:** If the app is waiting for an LLM/Server response, does it show a static spinner (BAD) or stream the skeleton/content (GOOD)?
+- **Optimistic UI:** Do likes/saves update the UI _instantly_ before the server confirms?
+
+---
+
+## Common Review Findings
+
+| Finding                         | Severity  | Fix                                           |
+| ------------------------------- | --------- | --------------------------------------------- |
+| Missing/Weak focus styles       | High      | Add visible `:focus-visible` with offset      |
+| `margin`/`padding` animated     | High      | Change to `transform: translate()`            |
+| Touch targets under 48px        | High      | Increase padding/min-height                   |
+| Layout shifts on load (CLS > 0) | High      | Pre-allocate space for async content/images   |
+| Linear CSS transitions          | Medium    | Upgrade to spring-based `cubic-bezier` curves |
+| Purple as primary color         | Low/Brand | Rethink palette — overused AI design cliché   |
+
+---
+
+## Audit Format Template
+
+When reporting a UI review, use this exact brutal structure:
+
+```markdown
+## UI/UX Pro-Max Review: [Component/Page Name]
+
+### ♿ Neuro-Inclusivity & A11y
+
+- [BLOCKER] [Finding with specific element and fix]
+- [WARN] [Finding]
+
+### ⚡ Performance & Energy (CWV)
+
+- [Finding]
+
+### 🎨 Visual & Spatial Quality
+
+- [Finding]
+
+### 🛠️ Interaction & Physics
+
+- [Finding]
+
+### Summary
+
+X blockers, Y warnings, Z suggestions.
+Recommended action before shipping: [specific steps]
+```
+
+---
+
+## Output Format
+
+When this skill produces a recommendation or design decision, structure your output as:
+
+```
+━━━ Web Design Guidelines Recommendation ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+Decision:    [what was chosen / proposed]
+Rationale:   [why — one concise line]
+Trade-offs:  [what is consciously accepted]
+Next action: [concrete next step for the user]
+─────────────────────────────────────────────────
+Pre-Flight:  ✅ All checks passed
+             or ❌ [blocking item that must be resolved first]
+```
+
+---
+
+---
+
+AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
+
+1. **Over-engineering:** Proposing complex abstractions or distributed systems when a simpler approach suffices.
+2. **Hallucinated Libraries/Methods:** Using non-existent methods or packages. Always `// VERIFY` or check `package.json` / `requirements.txt`.
+3. **Skipping Edge Cases:** Writing the "happy path" and ignoring error handling, timeouts, or data validation.
+4. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+5. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or re-raising.
+
+---
+
+**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
+**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+
+### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
 
+1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
+2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
+3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+
+Review these questions before confirming output:
+
+```
+✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
+✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
+✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
+✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+```
+
+### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+
+**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
+
+- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+
+## Pre-Flight Checklist
+
+- [ ] Have I reviewed the user's specific constraints and requests?
+- [ ] Have I checked the environment for relevant existing implementations?
+
+## VBC Protocol (Verification-Before-Completion)
+
+You MUST verify existing code signatures and variables before attempting to modify or call them. No hallucination is permitted.
 
 ---
 
@@ -214,6 +218,7 @@ AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this
 ### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
 
 Review these questions before confirming output:
+
 ```
 ✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
 ✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
@@ -224,5 +229,6 @@ Review these questions before confirming output:
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
 
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
+
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
 - ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.