switchboard-cli 0.1.0-alpha.3 → 0.1.0-alpha.4

package/node_modules/@switchboard/projections/node_modules/@switchboard/core/src/dossier.ts

@@ -1,229 +0,0 @@
-import type {
-  CompilerSelection,
-  ComplexityClassification,
-  OperatorReview,
-  ReconcileReport,
-  RunDossier,
-  SynthesizedSeed,
-} from "./types";
-import { runDossierSchema } from "./types";
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Dossier creation
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-function now() {
-  return new Date().toISOString();
-}
-
-export function createDossier(input: {
-  project_title: string;
-  fixture?: string;
-  complexity: ComplexityClassification;
-  compiler: CompilerSelection;
-  seed: SynthesizedSeed;
-}): RunDossier {
-  const ts = now();
-  return runDossierSchema.parse({
-    run_id: `run-${ts.replace(/[:.]/g, "-").slice(0, 19)}`,
-    project_title: input.project_title,
-    fixture: input.fixture ?? "",
-    created_at: ts,
-    updated_at: ts,
-    complexity_verdict: input.complexity.verdict,
-    process_mode: input.complexity.mode,
-    compiler_type: input.compiler.compiler_type,
-    seed_confidence: input.seed.confidence,
-    steps: [
-      {
-        phase: "seed-extraction",
-        timestamp: ts,
-        outcome: `confidence: ${input.seed.confidence}`,
-        detail: `title: ${input.project_title}, missing: ${input.seed.missing_inputs.length}, questions: ${input.seed.open_questions.length}`,
-      },
-      {
-        phase: "classification",
-        timestamp: ts,
-        outcome: `${input.complexity.verdict} / ${input.complexity.mode}`,
-        detail: input.complexity.rationale,
-      },
-      {
-        phase: "compiler-selection",
-        timestamp: ts,
-        outcome: `${input.compiler.compiler_type} → ${input.compiler.recommended_surface}`,
-        detail: input.compiler.rationale,
-      },
-    ],
-    promotion_result: "pending",
-  });
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Dossier step appending
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-export function addDossierStep(
-  dossier: RunDossier,
-  phase: string,
-  outcome: string,
-  detail?: string,
-): RunDossier {
-  return runDossierSchema.parse({
-    ...dossier,
-    updated_at: now(),
-    steps: [
-      ...dossier.steps,
-      {
-        phase,
-        timestamp: now(),
-        outcome,
-        detail: detail ?? "",
-      },
-    ],
-  });
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Reconcile recording
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-export function recordReconcile(
-  dossier: RunDossier,
-  reconcile: ReconcileReport,
-  promotionResult: "canonical" | "candidate",
-): RunDossier {
-  return runDossierSchema.parse({
-    ...dossier,
-    updated_at: now(),
-    reconcile_recommendation: reconcile.recommendation,
-    reconcile_findings_count: reconcile.findings.length,
-    reconcile_cleared_count: reconcile.cleared_count,
-    promotion_result: promotionResult,
-    steps: [
-      ...dossier.steps,
-      {
-        phase: "reconcile",
-        timestamp: now(),
-        outcome: `${reconcile.recommendation} (${reconcile.findings.length} findings, ${reconcile.cleared_count} cleared)`,
-        detail: reconcile.findings.map((f) => `${f.category}/${f.severity}: ${f.description.slice(0, 60)}`).join("; "),
-      },
-      {
-        phase: "promotion",
-        timestamp: now(),
-        outcome: promotionResult,
-        detail: promotionResult === "canonical"
-          ? "Promoted to canonical state."
-          : "Held as candidate — requires operator review.",
-      },
-    ],
-  });
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Operator review
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-export function addOperatorReview(
-  dossier: RunDossier,
-  judgment: OperatorReview["judgment"],
-  note?: string,
-): RunDossier {
-  return runDossierSchema.parse({
-    ...dossier,
-    updated_at: now(),
-    operator_reviews: [
-      ...dossier.operator_reviews,
-      {
-        date: now().split("T")[0],
-        judgment,
-        note: note ?? "",
-      },
-    ],
-    steps: [
-      ...dossier.steps,
-      {
-        phase: "operator-review",
-        timestamp: now(),
-        outcome: judgment,
-        detail: note ?? "",
-      },
-    ],
-  });
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Refs
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-export function setDossierRefs(
-  dossier: RunDossier,
-  refs: Partial<RunDossier["refs"]>,
-): RunDossier {
-  return runDossierSchema.parse({
-    ...dossier,
-    updated_at: now(),
-    refs: { ...dossier.refs, ...refs },
-  });
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Render (human-readable summary)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-export function renderDossier(dossier: RunDossier): string {
-  const lines: string[] = [];
-  lines.push(`# Run dossier: ${dossier.project_title}`);
-  lines.push("");
-  lines.push(`- **Run ID**: ${dossier.run_id}`);
-  if (dossier.fixture) lines.push(`- **Fixture**: ${dossier.fixture}`);
-  lines.push(`- **Created**: ${dossier.created_at}`);
-  lines.push(`- **Updated**: ${dossier.updated_at}`);
-  lines.push("");
-  lines.push("## Classification");
-  lines.push("");
-  lines.push(`| Field | Value |`);
-  lines.push(`|---|---|`);
-  lines.push(`| Complexity | ${dossier.complexity_verdict} |`);
-  lines.push(`| Mode | ${dossier.process_mode} |`);
-  lines.push(`| Compiler | ${dossier.compiler_type} |`);
-  lines.push(`| Seed confidence | ${dossier.seed_confidence} |`);
-  lines.push("");
-  lines.push("## Steps");
-  lines.push("");
-  for (const step of dossier.steps) {
-    lines.push(`- **${step.phase}** → ${step.outcome}${step.detail ? ` — ${step.detail.slice(0, 100)}` : ""}`);
-  }
-  lines.push("");
-
-  if (dossier.reconcile_recommendation) {
-    lines.push("## Reconcile");
-    lines.push("");
-    lines.push(`- **Recommendation**: ${dossier.reconcile_recommendation}`);
-    lines.push(`- **Findings**: ${dossier.reconcile_findings_count}`);
-    lines.push(`- **Cleared**: ${dossier.reconcile_cleared_count}`);
-    lines.push(`- **Promotion**: ${dossier.promotion_result}`);
-    lines.push("");
-  }
-
-  if (dossier.operator_reviews.length > 0) {
-    lines.push("## Operator reviews");
-    lines.push("");
-    for (const review of dossier.operator_reviews) {
-      lines.push(`- **${review.date}**: ${review.judgment}${review.note ? ` — ${review.note}` : ""}`);
-    }
-    lines.push("");
-  }
-
-  if (dossier.refs.seed || dossier.refs.brief || dossier.refs.handoff) {
-    lines.push("## References");
-    lines.push("");
-    if (dossier.refs.seed) lines.push(`- Seed: ${dossier.refs.seed}`);
-    if (dossier.refs.brief) lines.push(`- Brief: ${dossier.refs.brief}`);
-    if (dossier.refs.handoff) lines.push(`- Handoff: ${dossier.refs.handoff}`);
-    if (dossier.refs.execution_return) lines.push(`- Execution return: ${dossier.refs.execution_return}`);
-    if (dossier.refs.reconcile_report) lines.push(`- Reconcile report: ${dossier.refs.reconcile_report}`);
-    lines.push("");
-  }
-
-  return lines.join("\n");
-}

package/node_modules/@switchboard/projections/node_modules/@switchboard/core/src/eval-scope.ts

@@ -1,208 +0,0 @@
-import type {
-  AuditedReceipt,
-  EvaluationResult,
-  ProofManifest,
-  PromotionGate,
-  ValidationScope,
-} from "./types";
-import { promotionGateSchema } from "./types";
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Eval Scope — layered validation scope model
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-//
-// Three scopes, ordered from cheapest/fastest to most thorough:
-//
-//   micro-check  — claim coverage only. No contract compliance, no proof chain.
-//                  Cheap and fast. Suitable for small local changes where
-//                  the system wants a quick sanity check before proceeding.
-//
-//   slice-check  — claim coverage + contract compliance + proof chain integrity
-//                  for a single slice/dispatch. This is the standard check
-//                  after an execution returns.
-//
-//   full-run     — everything in slice-check, plus cross-slice lineage and
-//                  promotion eligibility. Required before any trust promotion
-//                  (e.g. milestone-review, closure-seal, archive-promotion).
-//
-// The scope is:
-//   1. Declared on evaluation input (requested_scope)
-//   2. Classified by classifyScope if not explicitly requested
-//   3. Persisted on the EvaluationResult (validation_scope)
-//   4. Checked by the promotion gate before trust-level advancement
-//
-// Invariant: a broader scope never weakens a narrower check's findings.
-//            It only adds more checks.
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Full-run availability gate
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-//
-// full-run is declared in the schema but no full-run-only check exists yet.
-// Until a real promotion_eligibility check is implemented, the system MUST
-// NOT emit validation_scope: "full-run" — doing so would let a paper label
-// satisfy a promotion gate that should require materially stricter checks.
-//
-// Set this to true ONLY when runEvaluation actually runs a full-run-only
-// phase (e.g. cross-slice lineage, promotion eligibility assessment).
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-export const FULL_RUN_AVAILABLE = false;
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Scope ordering — for comparison and gate logic
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-const SCOPE_ORDER: Record<ValidationScope, number> = {
-  "micro-check": 0,
-  "slice-check": 1,
-  "full-run": 2,
-};
-
-/**
- * Returns true if `performed` is at least as broad as `required`.
- */
-export function scopeCovers(
-  performed: ValidationScope,
-  required: ValidationScope,
-): boolean {
-  return SCOPE_ORDER[performed] >= SCOPE_ORDER[required];
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Scope classification — infer scope from what data is available
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-export interface ScopeClassificationInput {
-  /** Explicitly requested scope, if any. */
-  requested_scope?: ValidationScope;
-  /** Whether contract scope items were provided. */
-  has_contracted_scope: boolean;
-  /** Whether contract done-when criteria were provided. */
-  has_contracted_done_when: boolean;
-  /** Whether a proof manifest is available. */
-  has_proof_manifest: boolean;
-}
-
-/**
- * Classify the validation scope for an evaluation run.
- *
- * If the caller requests a specific scope, that scope is honored up to
- * the maximum achievable scope. If `full-run` is requested but
- * FULL_RUN_AVAILABLE is false, the scope is downgraded to `slice-check`
- * because emitting `full-run` without running full-run-only checks
- * would be dishonest.
- *
- * If no scope is requested, we infer from the available data:
- *   - proof manifest + contract → slice-check
- *   - proof manifest only → slice-check (proof chain is valuable even without contract)
- *   - contract only → slice-check (contract compliance is valuable even without proof)
- *   - neither → micro-check
- */
-export function classifyScope(input: ScopeClassificationInput): ValidationScope {
-  // Explicit request — honor it, but cap at max achievable
-  if (input.requested_scope) {
-    if (input.requested_scope === "full-run" && !FULL_RUN_AVAILABLE) {
-      // Fail closed: do not emit full-run when no full-run-only check exists
-      return "slice-check";
-    }
-    return input.requested_scope;
-  }
-
-  // Infer from available data — never auto-infer full-run
-  const hasStructuredInput = input.has_contracted_scope
-    || input.has_contracted_done_when
-    || input.has_proof_manifest;
-
-  return hasStructuredInput ? "slice-check" : "micro-check";
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Describe what checks a scope includes — for evaluation_scope field
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-/**
- * Returns the human-readable list of check categories included in a scope.
- *
- * full-run only claims promotion_eligibility when FULL_RUN_AVAILABLE is true.
- * Otherwise it is honest: same checks as slice-check.
- */
-export function scopeChecks(scope: ValidationScope): string[] {
-  switch (scope) {
-    case "micro-check":
-      return ["claim_coverage"];
-    case "slice-check":
-      return ["claim_coverage", "contract_compliance", "proof_chain_integrity"];
-    case "full-run":
-      return FULL_RUN_AVAILABLE
-        ? ["claim_coverage", "contract_compliance", "proof_chain_integrity", "promotion_eligibility"]
-        : ["claim_coverage", "contract_compliance", "proof_chain_integrity"];
-  }
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Promotion gate — enforce minimum scope before trust advancement
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-/**
- * Promotion levels and their minimum required validation scope.
- *
- * This is deliberately not an exhaustive list of all possible promotions.
- * It covers the ones Switchboard currently needs:
- *
- *   - loop_advance: moving to the next loop iteration → slice-check
- *   - closure_seal: sealing a loop for archival → full-run
- *   - milestone_review: human-facing milestone claim → full-run
- */
-export type PromotionLevel =
-  | "loop_advance"
-  | "closure_seal"
-  | "milestone_review";
-
-const PROMOTION_MINIMUM_SCOPE: Record<PromotionLevel, ValidationScope> = {
-  loop_advance: "slice-check",
-  closure_seal: "full-run",
-  milestone_review: "full-run",
-};
-
-/**
- * Check whether the performed evaluation scope is sufficient for a
- * requested promotion level.
- *
- * Returns a PromotionGate object that can be persisted alongside
- * the evaluation result.
- */
-export function checkPromotionGate(
-  performed: ValidationScope,
-  promotionLevel: PromotionLevel,
-): PromotionGate {
-  const required = PROMOTION_MINIMUM_SCOPE[promotionLevel];
-  const allowed = scopeCovers(performed, required);
-
-  const basis = allowed
-    ? `Scope "${performed}" meets minimum "${required}" for ${promotionLevel}.`
-    : `Scope "${performed}" is insufficient for ${promotionLevel}; requires at least "${required}".`;
-
-  return promotionGateSchema.parse({
-    scope_performed: performed,
-    promotion_allowed: allowed,
-    minimum_scope_required: required,
-    gate_basis: basis,
-  });
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Scope sufficiency from evaluation result — convenience for consumers
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-/**
- * Given an existing evaluation result, check if its scope is sufficient
- * for a given promotion level without re-running the evaluation.
- */
-export function evaluationScopeAllows(
-  evaluation: EvaluationResult,
-  promotionLevel: PromotionLevel,
-): PromotionGate {
-  return checkPromotionGate(evaluation.validation_scope, promotionLevel);
-}