switchboard-cli 0.1.0-alpha.3 → 0.1.0-alpha.4

package/node_modules/@switchboard/core/src/receipt-v2.ts

@@ -1,904 +0,0 @@
-import { randomBytes } from "crypto";
-import type {
-  AuditedReceipt,
-  AuditResult,
-  CanonicalDelta,
-  ClaimAssessmentV2,
-  ClaimDisposition,
-  EvidenceItemV2,
-  ExecutionMetadata,
-  FindingV2,
-  GateState,
-  IssuanceAssessment,
-  NextSlice,
-  NormalizedReturnEnvelope,
-  ProofManifest,
-  ProofSummary,
-  ReceiptIssuedV2,
-  ReceiptLifecyclePosture,
-  ReceiptStatusEvent,
-  ReceiptVerdict,
-  TrustPosture,
-  UnresolvedGap,
-  VerificationResult,
-} from "./types";
-import {
-  receiptIssuedV2Schema,
-  receiptLifecyclePostureSchema,
-} from "./types";
-import { deriveControlFlags } from "./run-snapshot";
-import type { TraceSummary } from "./execution-trace";
-import type { BudgetSummary } from "./budget-ledger";
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Receipt V2 — immutable issuance + append-only lifecycle
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Honesty guardrails — banned / restricted copy patterns
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-const BANNED_UNQUALIFIED_TERMS = [
-  "no issues",
-  "safe to deploy",
-  "certified",
-  "approved",
-  "audited",
-  "compliant",
-  "guaranteed",
-];
-
-const RESTRICTED_VERIFIED_TERM = "verified";
-
-/**
- * Check if text contains banned honesty terms.
- * Returns list of violations found.
- */
-export function checkHonestyViolations(text: string): string[] {
-  const lower = text.toLowerCase();
-  const violations: string[] = [];
-
-  for (const term of BANNED_UNQUALIFIED_TERMS) {
-    if (lower.includes(term)) {
-      violations.push(`Banned term "${term}" found in receipt text`);
-    }
-  }
-
-  // "verified" without scope qualifier is restricted
-  if (lower.includes(RESTRICTED_VERIFIED_TERM)) {
-    // Check if it's scope-qualified (preceded by "partially", "scope-", etc.)
-    const verifiedIdx = lower.indexOf(RESTRICTED_VERIFIED_TERM);
-    const before = lower.slice(Math.max(0, verifiedIdx - 20), verifiedIdx).trim();
-    const qualifiers = ["partially", "scope-qualified", "within scope", "for scope", "slice-check"];
-    const isQualified = qualifiers.some(q => before.includes(q));
-    if (!isQualified) {
-      violations.push(`Unqualified "${RESTRICTED_VERIFIED_TERM}" — must be scope-qualified`);
-    }
-  }
-
-  return violations;
-}
-
-/**
- * Returns true if the given verdict text is safe for use in a receipt.
- */
-export function isHonestCopy(text: string): boolean {
-  return checkHonestyViolations(text).length === 0;
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Posture precedence — resolves current lifecycle posture from status events
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-const POSTURE_PRECEDENCE: ReceiptLifecyclePosture[] = [
-  "REVOKED",
-  "SUSPENDED",
-  "EXPIRED",
-  "SUPERSEDED",
-  "CURRENT_WITH_LIMITS",
-  "CURRENT",
-];
-
-/**
- * Resolve the current lifecycle posture from an ordered list of status events.
- * Events are processed in chronological order.
- * Precedence: REVOKED > SUSPENDED > EXPIRED > SUPERSEDED > CURRENT_WITH_LIMITS > CURRENT
- */
-export function resolveCurrentPosture(
-  events: ReceiptStatusEvent[],
-): { posture: ReceiptLifecyclePosture; basis: string; active_limits: string[] } {
-  if (events.length === 0) {
-    return { posture: "CURRENT", basis: "No status events — receipt is current.", active_limits: [] };
-  }
-
-  // Process events chronologically to build state
-  let revoked = false;
-  let revokeReason = "";
-  let suspended = false;
-  let suspendReason = "";
-  let expired = false;
-  let expiryReason = "";
-  let superseded = false;
-  let supersededBy = "";
-  const activeLimits: string[] = [];
-
-  for (const event of events) {
-    switch (event.event_type) {
-      case "REVOKED":
-        revoked = true;
-        revokeReason = event.reason;
-        break;
-      case "SUSPENDED":
-        suspended = true;
-        suspendReason = event.reason;
-        break;
-      case "REINSTATED":
-        suspended = false;
-        break;
-      case "EXPIRED":
-        expired = true;
-        expiryReason = event.reason;
-        break;
-      case "EXPIRY_SET":
-        // Check if the expiry time has passed
-        if (event.expiry_at && new Date(event.expiry_at) <= new Date()) {
-          expired = true;
-          expiryReason = event.reason || `Expired at ${event.expiry_at}`;
-        }
-        break;
-      case "SUPERSEDED_BY":
-        superseded = true;
-        supersededBy = event.superseded_by_receipt_id;
-        break;
-      case "LIMIT_APPLIED":
-        activeLimits.push(event.limit_description || event.reason);
-        break;
-      case "LIMIT_LIFTED": {
-        const idx = activeLimits.indexOf(event.limit_description || event.reason);
-        if (idx >= 0) activeLimits.splice(idx, 1);
-        break;
-      }
-    }
-  }
-
-  // Resolve by precedence
-  if (revoked) {
-    return { posture: "REVOKED", basis: revokeReason, active_limits: activeLimits };
-  }
-  if (suspended) {
-    return { posture: "SUSPENDED", basis: suspendReason, active_limits: activeLimits };
-  }
-  if (expired) {
-    return { posture: "EXPIRED", basis: expiryReason, active_limits: activeLimits };
-  }
-  if (superseded) {
-    return {
-      posture: "SUPERSEDED",
-      basis: `Superseded by receipt ${supersededBy}`,
-      active_limits: activeLimits,
-    };
-  }
-  if (activeLimits.length > 0) {
-    return {
-      posture: "CURRENT_WITH_LIMITS",
-      basis: `${activeLimits.length} active limit(s): ${activeLimits.join("; ")}`,
-      active_limits: activeLimits,
-    };
-  }
-
-  return { posture: "CURRENT", basis: "No limiting status events.", active_limits: [] };
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Verdict aggregation — deterministic receipt verdict from evidence
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-/**
- * Derive the human-facing receipt verdict from verification results, evidence,
- * findings, gaps, gate state, and proof summary.
- *
- * Rules:
- * - Missing proof manifest forces inconclusive or not_verified
- * - Unresolved critical unknowns block pure verified treatment
- * - Scope must be explicit per verification result
- * - "verified" only when scope is full and evidence is sufficient
- */
-export function deriveReceiptVerdict(input: {
-  gate: GateState;
-  verification_results: VerificationResult[];
-  unresolved_gaps: UnresolvedGap[];
-  proof_summary: ProofSummary;
-  claim_assessments: ClaimAssessmentV2[];
-  residual_count: number;
-  /** Pre-computed honesty violations from summary text (if any). */
-  honesty_violations?: string[];
-}): IssuanceAssessment {
-  const { gate, verification_results, unresolved_gaps, proof_summary, claim_assessments, residual_count } = input;
-  const degradation_reasons: string[] = [];
-
-  // Pre-apply honesty violations — these degrade the verdict, not just decorate it
-  const honestyViolations = input.honesty_violations ?? [];
-  if (honestyViolations.length > 0) {
-    degradation_reasons.push(
-      ...honestyViolations.map(v => `Honesty violation in summary: ${v}`),
-    );
-  }
-
-  // Hard degradation: missing proof manifest
-  if (!proof_summary.manifest_present) {
-    degradation_reasons.push("Proof manifest is missing — cannot independently verify provenance");
-    return {
-      verdict: "inconclusive",
-      verdict_basis: "Proof manifest is not present. Receipt cannot verify execution provenance independently.",
-      scope_qualified: false,
-      scope_description: "",
-      degradation_reasons,
-      honesty_violations: honestyViolations,
-    };
-  }
-
-  // Hard degradation: gate blocked or held
-  if (gate.label === "blocked-missing-evidence") {
-    degradation_reasons.push(`Gate blocked: ${gate.reason}`);
-    return {
-      verdict: "not_verified",
-      verdict_basis: `Gate blocked — ${gate.reason}`,
-      scope_qualified: false,
-      scope_description: "",
-      degradation_reasons,
-      honesty_violations: honestyViolations,
-    };
-  }
-
-  if (gate.label === "held-for-review") {
-    degradation_reasons.push(`Gate held: ${gate.reason}`);
-    return {
-      verdict: "inconclusive",
-      verdict_basis: `Gate held for review — ${gate.reason}`,
-      scope_qualified: false,
-      scope_description: "",
-      degradation_reasons,
-      honesty_violations: honestyViolations,
-    };
-  }
-
-  // Check for critical unresolved gaps
-  const criticalGaps = unresolved_gaps.filter(g => g.impact === "blocks_verification");
-  if (criticalGaps.length > 0) {
-    degradation_reasons.push(`${criticalGaps.length} gap(s) block verification`);
-  }
-
-  // Check verification results
-  const failedVerifications = verification_results.filter(v => v.outcome === "fail");
-  const passedVerifications = verification_results.filter(v => v.outcome === "pass");
-  const totalVerifications = verification_results.length;
-
-  if (failedVerifications.length > 0) {
-    degradation_reasons.push(`${failedVerifications.length} verification(s) failed`);
-  }
-
-  // Check claim assessment quality
-  const unsubstantiated = claim_assessments.filter(c => c.disposition === "unsubstantiated");
-  const inferred = claim_assessments.filter(c => c.disposition === "inferred");
-  if (unsubstantiated.length > 0) {
-    degradation_reasons.push(`${unsubstantiated.length} claim(s) unsubstantiated`);
-  }
-
-  // Determine verdict
-  let verdict: ReceiptVerdict;
-  let scope_description = "";
-
-  if (criticalGaps.length > 0 || failedVerifications.length > 0) {
-    verdict = "not_verified";
-  } else if (
-    gate.label === "accepted" &&
-    residual_count === 0 &&
-    unsubstantiated.length === 0 &&
-    passedVerifications.length > 0 &&
-    degradation_reasons.length === 0
-  ) {
-    verdict = "verified";
-    scope_description = `${passedVerifications.length} verification(s) passed across ${totalVerifications} total`;
-  } else if (gate.label === "accepted" || gate.label === "accepted-with-cautions") {
-    if (inferred.length > 0 || unsubstantiated.length > 0 || residual_count > 0 || degradation_reasons.length > 0) {
-      verdict = "partially_verified";
-    } else {
-      verdict = "verified";
-    }
-    scope_description = `${passedVerifications.length}/${totalVerifications} verification(s) passed`;
-  } else {
-    verdict = "inconclusive";
-  }
-
-  return {
-    verdict,
-    verdict_basis: degradation_reasons.length > 0
-      ? `Degraded: ${degradation_reasons.join("; ")}`
-      : `Gate ${gate.label}, ${passedVerifications.length} verification(s) passed, ${residual_count} residual(s).`,
-    scope_qualified: verdict === "verified" && totalVerifications > 0,
-    scope_description,
-    degradation_reasons,
-    honesty_violations: honestyViolations,
-  };
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Build claim assessments (V2 two-axis model)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-function assessClaimsV2(
-  envelope: NormalizedReturnEnvelope,
-  delta: CanonicalDelta,
-): ClaimAssessmentV2[] {
-  const assessments: ClaimAssessmentV2[] = [];
-
-  const verificationPool = new Set(delta.verification_runs.map(v => v.toLowerCase()));
-  const evidencePool = new Set(delta.evidence_items.map(e => e.toLowerCase()));
-  const criteriaPool = new Set((delta.evidence_accounting?.criteria_met ?? []).map(c => c.toLowerCase()));
-
-  function classify(text: string): { disposition: ClaimDisposition; basis: string } {
-    const lower = text.toLowerCase();
-    const words = lower.split(/\s+/).filter(w => w.length > 3);
-    const fullMatchThreshold = words.length <= 2 ? 1 : 2;
-
-    let bestPartialLine = "";
-    let bestPartialScore = 0;
-    let bestPartialPool = "";
-
-    for (const v of verificationPool) {
-      const matchCount = words.filter(w => v.includes(w)).length;
-      if (matchCount >= fullMatchThreshold) {
-        return { disposition: "proven", basis: `Matched verification: ${v.slice(0, 80)}` };
-      }
-      if (matchCount > bestPartialScore) {
-        bestPartialScore = matchCount;
-        bestPartialLine = v;
-        bestPartialPool = "verification";
-      }
-    }
-
-    for (const e of evidencePool) {
-      const matchCount = words.filter(w => e.includes(w)).length;
-      if (matchCount >= fullMatchThreshold) {
-        return { disposition: "supported", basis: `Matched evidence: ${e.slice(0, 80)}` };
-      }
-      if (matchCount > bestPartialScore) {
-        bestPartialScore = matchCount;
-        bestPartialLine = e;
-        bestPartialPool = "evidence";
-      }
-    }
-
-    for (const c of criteriaPool) {
-      const matchCount = words.filter(w => c.includes(w)).length;
-      if (matchCount >= fullMatchThreshold) {
-        return { disposition: "supported", basis: `Matched criterion: ${c.slice(0, 80)}` };
-      }
-      if (matchCount > bestPartialScore) {
-        bestPartialScore = matchCount;
-        bestPartialLine = c;
-        bestPartialPool = "criterion";
-      }
-    }
-
-    if (bestPartialScore >= 1) {
-      return {
-        disposition: "partial",
-        basis: `Partial ${bestPartialPool} match (${bestPartialScore}/${words.length} keywords): ${bestPartialLine.slice(0, 80)}`,
-      };
-    }
-
-    const envelopeItem = envelope.evidence_items.find(ei => ei.text.toLowerCase() === lower);
-    if (envelopeItem && (envelopeItem.content_mode === "inferred" || envelopeItem.content_mode === "reconstructed")) {
-      return { disposition: "inferred", basis: `Content mode: ${envelopeItem.content_mode}` };
-    }
-
-    return { disposition: "unsubstantiated", basis: "No matching structured evidence found." };
-  }
-
-  // Summary claim
-  if (envelope.summary) {
-    const result = classify(envelope.summary);
-    assessments.push({
-      claim: envelope.summary,
-      source: "executor",
-      provenance_type: "claimed",
-      ...result,
-    });
-  }
-
-  // Criteria claims
-  for (const criterion of envelope.criteria_met) {
-    const result = classify(criterion.text);
-    assessments.push({
-      claim: criterion.text,
-      source: "executor",
-      provenance_type: criterion.content_mode === "direct" ? "observed" : "claimed",
-      ...result,
-    });
-  }
-
-  // Decision claims
-  for (const decision of envelope.decisions) {
-    const result = classify(decision.text);
-    assessments.push({
-      claim: decision.text,
-      source: "executor",
-      provenance_type: "derived",
-      ...result,
-    });
-  }
-
-  return assessments;
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Build verification results from delta/evidence
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-function buildVerificationResults(delta: CanonicalDelta): VerificationResult[] {
-  const results: VerificationResult[] = [];
-
-  for (const run of delta.verification_runs) {
-    results.push({
-      verification_id: `vr-${randomBytes(4).toString("hex")}`,
-      scope: "execution",
-      method: run.slice(0, 80),
-      outcome: "pass",
-      coverage: "",
-      determinism: "unknown",
-      evidence_type: "captured",
-      detail: run,
-    });
-  }
-
-  for (const check of delta.tests_or_checks) {
-    results.push({
-      verification_id: `vr-${randomBytes(4).toString("hex")}`,
-      scope: "test",
-      method: check.name,
-      outcome: check.passed ? "pass" : "fail",
-      coverage: "",
-      determinism: "deterministic",
-      evidence_type: "captured",
-      detail: `Test "${check.name}" — ${check.passed ? "passed" : "failed"}`,
-    });
-  }
-
-  return results;
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Build evidence items from delta
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-function buildEvidenceItemsV2(delta: CanonicalDelta): EvidenceItemV2[] {
-  const items: EvidenceItemV2[] = [];
-
-  for (const ev of delta.evidence_items) {
-    items.push({
-      evidence_id: `ev-${randomBytes(4).toString("hex")}`,
-      kind: "other",
-      provenance: "captured",
-      description: ev,
-      reference: "",
-    });
-  }
-
-  for (const fc of delta.file_changes) {
-    items.push({
-      evidence_id: `ev-${randomBytes(4).toString("hex")}`,
-      kind: "file_diff",
-      provenance: "captured",
-      description: `File changed: ${fc.path}`,
-      reference: fc.path,
-    });
-  }
-
-  return items;
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Build findings from audit + gate
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-function buildFindingsV2(audit: AuditResult | null | undefined, gate: GateState): FindingV2[] {
-  const findings: FindingV2[] = [];
-
-  if (audit) {
-    for (const f of audit.findings) {
-      findings.push({
-        finding_id: `fn-${randomBytes(4).toString("hex")}`,
-        severity: f.severity === "blocker" ? "blocker" : f.severity === "caution" ? "caution" : "info",
-        category: f.check,
-        detail: f.detail,
-        resolution: "",
-      });
-    }
-  }
-
-  if (!gate.honest) {
-    findings.push({
-      finding_id: `fn-${randomBytes(4).toString("hex")}`,
-      severity: "concern",
-      category: "gate_honesty",
-      detail: "Gate label is not consistent with evidence — gate_honest is false.",
-      resolution: "",
-    });
-  }
-
-  return findings;
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Build unresolved gaps
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-function buildUnresolvedGaps(delta: CanonicalDelta): UnresolvedGap[] {
-  return delta.unresolved.map(text => ({
-    gap_id: `gap-${randomBytes(4).toString("hex")}`,
-    description: text,
-    impact: "degrades_confidence" as const,
-    category: "unresolved_item",
-  }));
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Trust posture derivation (reused from V1 for backward compat)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-function deriveTrustPosture(
-  gate: GateState,
-  residualCount: number,
-): { posture: TrustPosture; basis: string } {
-  switch (gate.label) {
-    case "accepted":
-      if (residualCount === 0) {
-        return {
-          posture: "verified",
-          basis: `Gate accepted. ${gate.evidence_summary.verification_count} verification(s), ${gate.evidence_summary.evidence_count} evidence item(s). No residuals.`,
-        };
-      }
-      return { posture: "cautioned", basis: `Gate accepted but ${residualCount} residual(s) carry forward.` };
-    case "accepted-with-cautions":
-      return { posture: "cautioned", basis: gate.reason };
-    case "held-for-review":
-      return { posture: "held", basis: gate.reason };
-    case "blocked-missing-evidence":
-      return { posture: "blocked", basis: gate.reason };
-    case "pending":
-    case "not-checked":
-      return { posture: "unknown", basis: gate.reason };
-  }
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Build proof summary from proof manifest
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-function buildProofSummary(manifest: ProofManifest | null | undefined): ProofSummary {
-  if (!manifest) {
-    return {
-      captured_count: 0,
-      reconstructed_count: 0,
-      derived_count: 0,
-      total_artifacts: 0,
-      manifest_present: false,
-      manifest_id: "",
-    };
-  }
-
-  return {
-    captured_count: manifest.provenance_summary.captured_count,
-    reconstructed_count: manifest.provenance_summary.reconstructed_count,
-    derived_count: manifest.provenance_summary.derived_count,
-    total_artifacts: manifest.artifacts.length,
-    manifest_present: true,
-    manifest_id: manifest.manifest_id,
-  };
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Primary builder — build immutable ReceiptIssuedV2 from component objects
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-export interface BuildReceiptV2Input {
-  envelope: NormalizedReturnEnvelope;
-  delta: CanonicalDelta;
-  gate: GateState;
-  nextSlice: NextSlice | null;
-  projectId?: string;
-  audit?: AuditResult | null;
-  traceSummary?: TraceSummary | null;
-  budgetSummary?: BudgetSummary | null;
-  proofManifest?: ProofManifest | null;
-  executionMeta?: Partial<ExecutionMetadata>;
-  v1ReceiptId?: string;
-  /** Meta harness provenance — when a harness compile pass ran for this dispatch. */
-  harnessProvenance?: {
-    harness_ran: boolean;
-    compilation_id: string;
-    selected_candidate_id: string;
-    experiment: string;
-    selection_rationale: string;
-    context_chars_added: number;
-    was_no_op: boolean;
-  } | null;
-}
-
-export function buildReceiptIssuedV2(input: BuildReceiptV2Input): ReceiptIssuedV2 {
-  const {
-    envelope, delta, gate, nextSlice, projectId = "",
-    audit, proofManifest, executionMeta, v1ReceiptId,
-  } = input;
-
-  // Claim assessments (two-axis)
-  const claim_assessments = assessClaimsV2(envelope, delta);
-
-  // Verification results
-  const verification_results = buildVerificationResults(delta);
-
-  // Evidence items
-  const evidence_items = buildEvidenceItemsV2(delta);
-
-  // Findings
-  const findings = buildFindingsV2(audit, gate);
-
-  // Unresolved gaps
-  const unresolved_gaps = buildUnresolvedGaps(delta);
-
-  // Residuals
-  const auditCautions = audit?.findings.filter(f => f.severity === "caution").map(f => `[audit] ${f.detail}`) ?? [];
-  const auditBlockers = audit?.findings.filter(f => f.severity === "blocker").map(f => `[audit-blocker] ${f.detail}`) ?? [];
-  const cautions_on_record = [...delta.cautions, ...auditCautions, ...auditBlockers];
-  const unresolved_on_record = delta.unresolved;
-  const residual_count = cautions_on_record.length + unresolved_on_record.length;
-
-  // Proof summary
-  const proof_summary = buildProofSummary(proofManifest);
-
-  // Enforce honesty guards on the summary BEFORE verdict derivation
-  const summaryViolations = checkHonestyViolations(envelope.summary);
-
-  // Issuance assessment (human-facing verdict) — honesty violations degrade the verdict
-  const issuance_assessment = deriveReceiptVerdict({
-    gate,
-    verification_results,
-    unresolved_gaps,
-    proof_summary,
-    claim_assessments,
-    residual_count,
-    honesty_violations: summaryViolations,
-  });
-
-  // Trust posture (V1 compat) — aligned down if issuance_assessment is weaker
-  let { posture: trust_posture, basis: trust_basis } = deriveTrustPosture(gate, residual_count);
-
-  // Prevent trust_posture from being stronger than issuance_assessment.verdict
-  const verdictToTrust: Record<string, TrustPosture> = {
-    verified: "verified",
-    partially_verified: "cautioned",
-    inconclusive: "held",
-    not_verified: "blocked",
-    disputed: "held",
-  };
-  const trustRank: Record<TrustPosture, number> = {
-    verified: 0, cautioned: 1, held: 2, blocked: 3, unknown: 4,
-  };
-  const verdictTrust = verdictToTrust[issuance_assessment.verdict] ?? "unknown";
-  if (trustRank[trust_posture] < trustRank[verdictTrust]) {
-    trust_posture = verdictTrust;
-    trust_basis = `Aligned to issuance verdict "${issuance_assessment.verdict}": ${issuance_assessment.verdict_basis}`;
-  }
-
-  // Closure
-  const phase = gate.label === "accepted" ? "accepted" as const
-    : gate.label === "accepted-with-cautions" ? "accepted_with_cautions" as const
-    : gate.label === "held-for-review" ? "held_for_review" as const
-    : gate.label === "blocked-missing-evidence" ? "blocked" as const
-    : "return_received" as const;
-  const { closureAllowed } = deriveControlFlags(phase, true);
-
-  let closure_basis: string;
-  if (closureAllowed) {
-    closure_basis = delta.objective_state === "met" && delta.unresolved.length === 0
-      ? "Objective met, gate passed, no unresolved items."
-      : `Gate: ${gate.label}. Closure permitted despite ${delta.unresolved.length} unresolved item(s).`;
-  } else {
-    const reasons: string[] = [];
-    if (gate.label === "held-for-review") reasons.push("Gate held for review");
-    if (gate.label === "blocked-missing-evidence") reasons.push("Gate blocked — missing evidence");
-    if (delta.unresolved.length > 0) reasons.push(`${delta.unresolved.length} unresolved item(s)`);
-    if (reasons.length === 0) reasons.push("Pre-return phase — no return to close");
-    closure_basis = reasons.join(". ") + ".";
-  }
-
-  // Advancement
-  const ea = delta.evidence_accounting;
-  let state_advanced: boolean;
-  let advancement_basis: string;
-  if (!ea) {
-    state_advanced = delta.state_fields_advanced.length > 0;
-    advancement_basis = state_advanced ? delta.state_fields_advanced.join("; ") : "No evidence accounting available.";
-  } else if (ea.consequence_type === "no-change") {
-    state_advanced = false;
-    advancement_basis = ea.consequence_label;
-  } else {
-    state_advanced = true;
-    advancement_basis = ea.consequence_label;
-  }
-
-  // Execution metadata
-  const execution: ExecutionMetadata = {
-    surface: executionMeta?.surface ?? envelope.source_surface,
-    model: executionMeta?.model ?? "",
-    duration_ms: executionMeta?.duration_ms ?? 0,
-    realization_type: executionMeta?.realization_type ?? "",
-    environment: executionMeta?.environment ?? "",
-    human_intervention: executionMeta?.human_intervention ?? "unknown",
-  };
-
-  return receiptIssuedV2Schema.parse({
-    receipt_id: `rcv2-${randomBytes(8).toString("hex")}`,
-    receipt_version: 2,
-    issued_at: new Date().toISOString(),
-    project_id: projectId || delta.project_id,
-    dispatch_id: envelope.dispatch_id,
-    return_id: envelope.return_id,
-    envelope_id: envelope.envelope_id,
-    delta_id: delta.delta_id,
-
-    objective_asked: envelope.objective_used,
-    scope_summary: delta.evidence_accounting
-      ? `${delta.evidence_accounting.scope_check_pass_count}/${delta.evidence_accounting.scope_check_count} scope checks passed`
-      : "",
-
-    execution,
-
-    outcome_claimed: envelope.outcome_class,
-    summary_claimed: envelope.summary,
-
-    claim_assessments,
-    verification_results,
-    evidence_items,
-    findings,
-    unresolved_gaps,
-
-    gate_label: gate.label,
-    gate_reason: gate.reason,
-    gate_honest: gate.honest,
-
-    issuance_assessment,
-
-    state_advanced,
-    advancement_basis,
-    consequence_type: ea?.consequence_type ?? "no-change",
-    consequence_label: ea?.consequence_label ?? "No evidence accounting available.",
-
-    cautions_on_record,
-    unresolved_on_record,
-    residual_count,
-
-    next_slice_exists: !!nextSlice,
-    next_slice_id: nextSlice?.slice_id ?? "",
-    next_slice_title: nextSlice?.title ?? "",
-
-    proof_summary,
-    provenance_posture: envelope.provenance_posture,
-
-    audit_and_evaluation_links: {},
-    redaction_profile: { mode: "full", redacted_fields: [], share_safe: false },
-
-    closure_allowed: closureAllowed,
-    closure_basis,
-
-    trust_posture,
-    trust_basis,
-
-    v1_receipt_id: v1ReceiptId ?? "",
-
-    harness_provenance: input.harnessProvenance ?? {
-      harness_ran: false,
-      compilation_id: "",
-      selected_candidate_id: "",
-      experiment: "",
-      selection_rationale: "",
-      context_chars_added: 0,
-      was_no_op: true,
-    },
-  });
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Create a status event
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-export function createStatusEvent(
-  receiptId: string,
-  eventType: ReceiptStatusEvent["event_type"],
-  reason: string,
-  opts?: {
-    issued_by?: string;
-    superseded_by_receipt_id?: string;
-    expiry_at?: string;
-    limit_description?: string;
-  },
-): ReceiptStatusEvent {
-  return {
-    event_id: `rse-${randomBytes(8).toString("hex")}`,
-    receipt_id: receiptId,
-    event_type: eventType,
-    reason,
-    issued_by: opts?.issued_by ?? "system",
-    issued_at: new Date().toISOString(),
-    superseded_by_receipt_id: opts?.superseded_by_receipt_id ?? "",
-    expiry_at: opts?.expiry_at ?? "",
-    limit_description: opts?.limit_description ?? "",
-    metadata: {},
-  };
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Prepare share-safe view of a receipt
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-/**
- * Prepare a share-safe view of a V2 receipt. The share view:
- * - Preserves: posture, scope, evidence basis, open item count, integrity, timestamps, evaluation scope
- * - May redact: internal project IDs, environment details
- * - Must NOT be more reassuring than the full view
- */
-export function prepareShareView(
-  receipt: ReceiptIssuedV2,
-  statusEvents: ReceiptStatusEvent[],
-): ReceiptIssuedV2 & { current_status: ReturnType<typeof resolveCurrentPosture> } {
-  const current_status = resolveCurrentPosture(statusEvents);
-
-  // Create share-safe copy — preserve decision-critical context
-  const shareReceipt: ReceiptIssuedV2 = {
-    ...receipt,
-    redaction_profile: {
-      mode: "share",
-      redacted_fields: ["project_id"],
-      share_safe: true,
-    },
-    // Redact internal identifiers but keep everything decision-critical
-    project_id: "[redacted]",
-  };
-
-  return { ...shareReceipt, current_status };
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Format receipt for JSON export
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-export function formatReceiptForExport(
-  receipt: ReceiptIssuedV2,
-  statusEvents: ReceiptStatusEvent[],
-  evaluation?: { evaluation_id: string; verdict: string; scope: string; timestamp: string; basis: string } | null,
-): Record<string, unknown> {
-  const current_status = resolveCurrentPosture(statusEvents);
-
-  // Attach evaluation links if available
-  const withEval: ReceiptIssuedV2 = evaluation
-    ? {
-      ...receipt,
-      audit_and_evaluation_links: {
-        latest_evaluation_id: evaluation.evaluation_id,
-        evaluation_verdict: evaluation.verdict,
-        evaluation_scope: evaluation.scope,
-        evaluation_timestamp: evaluation.timestamp,
-        evaluation_basis: evaluation.basis,
-      },
-    }
-    : receipt;
-
-  return {
-    receipt: withEval,
-    current_status,
-    status_history: statusEvents,
-    exported_at: new Date().toISOString(),
-    export_format_version: "1.0.0",
-  };
-}