superlab 0.1.0 → 0.1.2

package/package-assets/shared/templates/idea.md

@@ -1,12 +1,65 @@
 # Idea Artifact
 
-## Problem
+## One-Sentence Problem
 
-Describe the problem being addressed.
+State the problem in one short sentence.
 
-## Motivation
+## Failure Case
 
-Explain why the problem matters.
+- Where current methods fail:
+- Why the failure matters:
+
+## Idea Classification
+
+- Problem type:
+- Research setting:
+- Why this is not a trivial tweak:
+
+## Contribution Category
+
+- Primary category:
+- Secondary category:
+
+Typical categories:
+- new task
+- new setting
+- new dataset or evaluation
+- new method or module
+- new training strategy
+- new empirical finding
+- new theory or explanation
+- engineering enhancement
+
+## Breakthrough Level
+
+- Level:
+- Justification:
+
+Suggested levels:
+- L0: engineering or tuning
+- L1: incremental improvement
+- L2: clear methodological novelty
+- L3: potential paradigm or problem-setting shift
+
+## Existing Methods
+
+- Mainstream line 1:
+- Mainstream line 2:
+- Shared assumption:
+- Why that assumption breaks here:
+
+## Why Ours Is Different
+
+- Existing methods rely on:
+- Our idea changes:
+- Expected advantage:
+- Evidence needed to prove the advantage:
+
+## Three Meaningful Points
+
+1. Significance:
+2. Difference:
+3. Expected payoff:
 
 ## Sourced Evidence
 
@@ -15,11 +68,20 @@ Explain why the problem matters.
 - Typical datasets:
 - Typical metrics:
 
-## Generated Hypotheses
+## Candidate Approaches
 
-- Proposed innovation:
-- Why it might work:
-- Expected risks:
+- Approach 1:
+  Trade-offs:
+- Approach 2:
+  Trade-offs:
+- Approach 3:
+  Trade-offs:
+- Recommended approach:
+
+## Falsifiable Hypothesis
+
+- If the idea is correct:
+- If the idea is wrong:
 
 ## Candidate Experiment
 
@@ -33,3 +95,9 @@ Explain why the problem matters.
 
 - Main weaknesses:
 - What must be validated before implementation:
+- Kill criteria:
+
+## Approval Gate
+
+- User-approved direction:
+- Open questions before `/lab:spec`:

package/package-assets/shared/templates/iteration-report.md

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 
 - Iteration number:
 - Run id:
+- Completion Promise:
 
 ## Hypothesis
 
@@ -28,8 +29,11 @@ List the concrete implementation or experiment changes.
 - Main concerns:
 - Methodology concerns:
 - Interpretation concerns:
+- Diagnostic mode needed:
 
 ## Decision
 
 - Continue or stop:
 - Next action:
+- Top blockers:
+- Next best actions:

package/package-assets/shared/templates/paper-plan.md

@@ -4,11 +4,14 @@
 
 - Venue or audience:
 - Paper status:
+- Core story in one sentence:
+- Terminology lock:
 
 ## Section Status
 
 - Abstract:
 - Introduction:
+- Related Work:
 - Method:
 - Experiments:
 - Conclusion:
@@ -18,9 +21,18 @@
 - Main result sources:
 - Ablation sources:
 - Limitation sources:
+- Claims that still need more evidence:
 
 ## Writing Order
 
 1. First section target:
 2. Second section target:
 3. Deferred sections:
+
+## Five-Dimension Self-Review Status
+
+- Contribution:
+- Writing clarity:
+- Experimental strength:
+- Evaluation completeness:
+- Method design soundness:

package/package-assets/shared/templates/paper-section.md

@@ -4,22 +4,40 @@
 
 - Name:
 - Goal for this round:
+- Source guide loaded:
 
-## Claims
+## Mini-Outline
 
-- Claim 1:
-- Claim 2:
+- Point 1:
+- Point 2:
+- Point 3:
 
-## Evidence Links
+## Claim-Evidence Map
 
-- Supporting artifact 1:
-- Supporting artifact 2:
+- Claim 1:
+  Evidence:
+  Status:
+- Claim 2:
+  Evidence:
+  Status:
 
 ## Draft
 
 Write the current section text here.
 
+## Paragraph Roles
+
+- Paragraph 1:
+- Paragraph 2:
+- Paragraph 3:
+
+## Terminology Check
+
+- Terms that must stay fixed:
+- New terms introduced this round:
+
 ## Reviewer Notes
 
 - Main concerns:
+- Five-dimension self-review summary:
 - Next revision target:

package/package-assets/shared/templates/paper-section.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+% Section file generated by /lab:write
+% Final manuscript language should be chosen for the paper itself.
+
+\section{Section Title}
+
+% Paragraph 1
+
+% Paragraph 2
+
+% Paragraph 3

package/package-assets/shared/templates/paper.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+\documentclass{article}
+\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
+\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
+\usepackage{hyperref}
+\usepackage{graphicx}
+\usepackage{booktabs}
+
+\title{Paper Title}
+\author{Author Name}
+\date{}
+
+\begin{document}
+\maketitle
+
+\begin{abstract}
+% Keep the final paper language independent from the workflow language.
+\input{sections/abstract}
+\end{abstract}
+
+\input{sections/introduction}
+\input{sections/related_work}
+\input{sections/method}
+\input{sections/experiments}
+\input{sections/conclusion}
+
+\bibliographystyle{plain}
+\bibliography{references}
+
+\end{document}

package/package-assets/shared/templates/proposal.md

@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
 # Proposal
 
+## Lab Change
+
+- Change id:
+- Target path: `.superlab/changes/<change-id>/proposal.md`
+
 ## Scope
 
 State the research change being proposed.
@@ -19,3 +24,8 @@ Why this change is worth evaluating.
 - Methodology risk:
 - Reproducibility risk:
 - Execution risk:
+
+## Validation
+
+- Change directory created:
+- Proposal/design/spec/tasks consistency checked:

package/package-assets/shared/templates/review-checklist.md

@@ -1,5 +1,28 @@
 # Review Checklist
 
+## Concise Summary
+
+- Artifact under review:
+- Top review question:
+
+## Fatal Flaws
+
+- Fatal flaw 1:
+- Fatal flaw 2:
+
+## Fix Priority
+
+1. Highest-priority fix:
+2. Second-priority fix:
+3. Deferred fix:
+
+## Residual Risks
+
+- Risk 1:
+- Risk 2:
+
+## Checklist
+
 - Are the dataset and split choices stated clearly?
 - Is the baseline fair, current, and reproducible?
 - Are the primary and secondary metrics justified?

package/package-assets/shared/templates/spec.md

@@ -1,16 +1,21 @@
 # Spec
 
+## Lab Change
+
+- Change id:
+- Target path: `.superlab/changes/<change-id>/spec.md`
+
 ## Requirements
 
 - The workflow must preserve sourced evidence separately from generated hypotheses.
-- The workflow must generate OpenSpec-compatible artifacts.
+- The workflow must generate lab-native change artifacts under one change directory.
 - The workflow must support bounded experiment iteration.
 - The workflow must produce normalized evaluation summaries.
 
 ## Acceptance
 
 - Idea artifact written
-- OpenSpec artifacts written
+- Lab change artifacts written in `.superlab/changes/<change-id>/`
 - Validation run executed
 - Iteration reports generated
 - Final report generated

package/package-assets/shared/templates/tasks.md

@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
 # Tasks
 
+- [ ] Identify the approved lab change id.
+- [ ] Create `.superlab/changes/<change-id>/`.
 - [ ] Write the idea artifact.
-- [ ] Convert the idea into OpenSpec `spec-driven` artifacts.
+- [ ] Convert the idea into `.superlab/changes/<change-id>/proposal.md`, `.superlab/changes/<change-id>/design.md`, `.superlab/changes/<change-id>/spec.md`, and `.superlab/changes/<change-id>/tasks.md`.
 - [ ] Run the first validation experiment.
 - [ ] Normalize and validate the evaluation summary.
 - [ ] Execute bounded iteration rounds.

package/package-assets/shared/templates/write-iteration.md

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 
 - Iteration number:
 - Section target:
+- Section guide used:
 
 ## Inputs
 
@@ -15,14 +16,18 @@
 
 - What changed:
 - Why it changed:
+- Mini-outline used:
 
 ## Review Check
 
 - Claim-evidence alignment:
 - Overstatement risk:
 - Missing support:
+- Terminology consistency:
+- Five-dimension self-review outcome:
 
 ## Decision
 
 - Continue or stop:
 - Next writing target:
+- Route back to `review` or `iterate` if needed:

package/package.json

@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 {
   "name": "superlab",
-  "version": "0.1.0",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "description": "Strict /lab research workflow installer for Codex and Claude",
   "keywords": [
     "codex",
     "claude",
     "research",
     "workflow",
-    "openspec",
-    "experiments"
+    "experiments",
+    "latex"
   ],
   "author": "zhouhaoUCAS",
   "license": "MIT",

package/package-assets/shared/scripts/check_openspec.sh

@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-#!/usr/bin/env bash
-set -euo pipefail
-
-if command -v openspec-cn >/dev/null 2>&1; then
-  echo "OpenSpec CLI detected: openspec-cn"
-  exit 0
-fi
-
-echo "OpenSpec CLI not found. Install and expose 'openspec-cn' before using /lab." >&2
-exit 1