start-vibing-stacks 2.28.0 → 2.30.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (66) hide show
  1. package/dist/migrate.js +81 -43
  2. package/dist/setup.js +20 -1
  3. package/package.json +1 -1
  4. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/README.md +452 -0
  5. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/RESEARCH-REPORT.md +157 -0
  6. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/SKILL.md +210 -0
  7. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/SKILLS-UPDATE-REPORT.md +255 -0
  8. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/agents/audit-budget.md +116 -0
  9. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/agents/audit-compliance.md +131 -0
  10. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/agents/audit-creative.md +127 -0
  11. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/agents/audit-google.md +113 -0
  12. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/agents/audit-meta.md +112 -0
  13. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/agents/audit-tracking.md +134 -0
  14. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/agents/copy-writer.md +188 -0
  15. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/agents/creative-strategist.md +199 -0
  16. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/agents/format-adapter.md +175 -0
  17. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/agents/visual-designer.md +245 -0
  18. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/additional-platforms.md +106 -0
  19. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/benchmarks.md +257 -0
  20. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/bidding-strategies.md +333 -0
  21. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/brand-dna-template.md +190 -0
  22. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/budget-allocation.md +150 -0
  23. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/compliance.md +280 -0
  24. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/conversion-tracking.md +246 -0
  25. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/copy-frameworks.md +187 -0
  26. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/funnel-content-copy-rules.md +44 -0
  27. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/gaql-notes.md +49 -0
  28. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/google-audit.md +217 -0
  29. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/google-creative-specs.md +119 -0
  30. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/image-providers.md +133 -0
  31. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/linkedin-audit.md +141 -0
  32. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/linkedin-creative-specs.md +129 -0
  33. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/mcp-integration.md +125 -0
  34. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/meta-audit.md +141 -0
  35. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/meta-creative-specs.md +134 -0
  36. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/microsoft-audit.md +158 -0
  37. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/microsoft-creative-specs.md +123 -0
  38. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/platform-specs.md +276 -0
  39. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/scoring-system.md +169 -0
  40. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/tiktok-audit.md +165 -0
  41. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/tiktok-creative-specs.md +139 -0
  42. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/voice-to-style.md +87 -0
  43. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/references/youtube-creative-specs.md +134 -0
  44. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-apple/SKILL.md +225 -0
  45. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-audit/SKILL.md +108 -0
  46. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-budget/SKILL.md +198 -0
  47. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-competitor/SKILL.md +198 -0
  48. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-create/SKILL.md +198 -0
  49. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-creative/SKILL.md +208 -0
  50. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-dna/SKILL.md +245 -0
  51. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-generate/SKILL.md +173 -0
  52. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-google/SKILL.md +192 -0
  53. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-landing/SKILL.md +186 -0
  54. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-linkedin/SKILL.md +200 -0
  55. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-math/SKILL.md +216 -0
  56. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-meta/SKILL.md +167 -0
  57. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-microsoft/SKILL.md +163 -0
  58. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-photoshoot/SKILL.md +220 -0
  59. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-plan/SKILL.md +176 -0
  60. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-test/SKILL.md +199 -0
  61. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-tiktok/SKILL.md +190 -0
  62. package/stacks/_shared/ads-agents/skills/ads-youtube/SKILL.md +199 -0
  63. package/stacks/_shared/hooks/_state.ts +8 -2
  64. package/stacks/_shared/hooks/plan-gate.ts +138 -0
  65. package/stacks/_shared/memories/funnel-content-copy.md +81 -0
  66. package/templates/CLAUDE-python.md +6 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: ads-competitor
3
+ version: 1.5.0
4
+ description: "Competitor ad intelligence analysis across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, Microsoft, and Apple Ads. Analyzes competitor ad copy, creative strategy, keyword targeting, estimated spend, and identifies competitive gaps and opportunities. Use when user says competitor ads, ad spy, competitive analysis, competitor PPC, or ad intelligence."
5
+ user-invokable: false
6
+ ---
7
+
8
+ <!-- Updated: 2026-04-13 | v1.5 -->
9
+
10
+ # Competitor Ad Intelligence
11
+
12
+ ## Process
13
+
14
+ 1. Identify target competitors (from user input or industry analysis)
15
+ 2. Read `ads-agents/references/benchmarks.md` for industry CPC/CTR/CVR baselines
16
+ 3. Research competitor ad presence across platforms
17
+ 4. Analyze ad copy, creative, and messaging themes
18
+ 5. Estimate competitor spend and keyword strategy
19
+ 6. Identify gaps and opportunities
20
+ 7. Generate competitive intelligence report
21
+
22
+ ## Data Sources
23
+
24
+ ### Free Intelligence Sources
25
+ | Source | Platform | What You Can Find |
26
+ |--------|----------|------------------|
27
+ | Google Ads Transparency Center | Google | Active ads, formats, geo targeting |
28
+ | Meta Ad Library | Meta/Instagram | All active ads, creative, copy, spend range |
29
+ | LinkedIn Ad Library | LinkedIn | Active ads from company pages |
30
+ | TikTok Creative Center | TikTok | Top ads, trending creative, hashtags |
31
+ | Microsoft Ads | Microsoft | Limited: use auction insights |
32
+ | Apple Ads (App Store) | Apple | Search tab ads, Today tab ads, product page creatives |
33
+
34
+ ### Google Ads Auction Insights
35
+ Available from the user's own Google Ads account:
36
+ - Impression share vs competitors
37
+ - Overlap rate (how often you compete)
38
+ - Outranking share (who wins more often)
39
+ - Top of page rate and absolute top of page rate
40
+ - Available for Search and Shopping campaigns
41
+
42
+ ### Platform-Specific Research
43
+
44
+ #### Google
45
+ - Ads Transparency Center: search by advertiser name or domain
46
+ - Search for competitor brand terms to see their ads live
47
+ - Auction Insights for impression share comparison
48
+
49
+ #### Meta
50
+ - Ad Library: filter by advertiser, country, platform (FB/IG), date range
51
+ - Shows creative (image/video), ad copy, active dates
52
+ - Shows platform placement (Facebook, Instagram, Audience Network)
53
+
54
+ #### LinkedIn
55
+ - Ad Library: search by company name
56
+ - Shows Sponsored Content, Message Ads
57
+ - Limited data compared to Meta Ad Library
58
+
59
+ #### TikTok
60
+ - Creative Center 2.0: top-performing ads by industry, country, objective with enhanced filtering
61
+ - Hashtag analytics: trending sounds and hashtags
62
+ - TikTok Shop: review competitor storefronts, catalogs, reviews, and live shopping
63
+ - No per-advertiser library; use Creative Center for industry trends
64
+
65
+ #### Apple Ads
66
+ - App Store search: search competitor brand terms to see their Search tab ads
67
+ - Today tab ads: check competitor presence on App Store homepage
68
+ - Custom Product Pages: analyze competitor CPP variants via App Store listings
69
+
70
+ ## 2025-2026 Platform Updates
71
+
72
+ ### Meta
73
+ - **Andromeda creative clustering** (launched October 2025): ads with >60% similarity are suppressed. Competitor creative analysis must assess genuine conceptual diversity, not just volume
74
+ - **Advantage+ Sales** (renamed from ASC): unified shopping campaign type. Check if competitors are running Advantage+ Sales vs manual campaigns
75
+
76
+ ### Google
77
+ - **Demand Gen replaced VAC** (April 2026): Video Action Campaigns fully deprecated. Analyze competitor Demand Gen adoption (multi-format video+image)
78
+ - **AI Max for Search**: AI-powered campaign type with 14% conversion lift. Check competitor adoption via Ads Transparency Center
79
+ - **Expanded Ads Transparency Center**: richer data on competitor ad history, formats, and targeting regions
80
+
81
+ ### TikTok
82
+ - **Creative Center 2.0**: enhanced industry benchmarking, top ads filtering by objective and format
83
+ - **Symphony AI variations** (2025): AI-generated creative at scale. Assess whether competitors use Symphony-generated vs original content
84
+ - **TikTok Shop competitor analysis**: review competitor Shop tabs, product catalogs, reviews, and live shopping activity
85
+
86
+ ### LinkedIn
87
+ - **Thought Leader Ads expansion** (March 2025): now supports non-employee creators and influencers. Check if competitors sponsor external thought leaders
88
+ - **CRM integration** (June 2025): enhanced audience matching. Competitors with CRM integration show more precise targeting patterns
89
+
90
+ ### Microsoft
91
+ - **Copilot ads in conversations**: new placement in Microsoft Copilot chat. Check if competitors appear in conversational ad placements
92
+ - **CTV inventory**: ads on Netflix, Max, Hulu, and Roku via Microsoft Advertising. Assess competitor presence on connected TV
93
+
94
+ ### Apple Ads
95
+ - **Rebranded to "Apple Ads"** (April 2025): formerly Apple Search Ads. All references updated
96
+ - **Custom Product Page (CPP) competitive analysis**: competitors can run different product page variants per ad group. Analyze CPP strategies
97
+ - **Maximize Conversions bidding**: AI auto-bidder (GA February 2026). Check if competitors have adopted automated bidding
98
+
99
+ > **MCP Integration**: For live API access to competitor data sources, see `ads-agents/references/mcp-integration.md`.
100
+
101
+ ## Competitive Analysis Framework
102
+
103
+ ### 1. Ad Copy Analysis
104
+ For each competitor, document:
105
+ - **Headlines**: primary messages and value propositions
106
+ - **CTAs**: what action they're driving (free trial, demo, buy now, learn more)
107
+ - **Offers**: pricing, discounts, free shipping, trials
108
+ - **Tone**: professional, casual, urgent, educational, emotional
109
+ - **USPs**: unique selling propositions they emphasize
110
+ - **Pain points**: customer problems they address
111
+
112
+ ### 2. Creative Strategy Analysis
113
+ - **Formats used**: image, video, carousel, collection, document
114
+ - **Visual style**: photography, illustration, UGC, stock, branded
115
+ - **Video approach**: studio quality vs UGC vs animated
116
+ - **Creative volume**: how many active ads (indicator of testing velocity)
117
+ - **Refresh frequency**: how often new creatives appear
118
+
119
+ ### 3. Messaging Themes
120
+ Categorize competitor messaging into themes:
121
+ | Theme | Competitor A | Competitor B | Your Brand |
122
+ |-------|-------------|-------------|------------|
123
+ | Price/Value | ✅ Primary | ⚠️ Secondary | ? |
124
+ | Quality/Premium | ❌ | ✅ Primary | ? |
125
+ | Speed/Convenience | ⚠️ Secondary | ❌ | ? |
126
+ | Trust/Authority | ✅ Primary | ✅ Primary | ? |
127
+ | Innovation | ❌ | ⚠️ Secondary | ? |
128
+
129
+ ### 4. Keyword Intelligence (Google/Microsoft/Apple Ads)
130
+ - Brand keyword bidding: are competitors bidding on your brand?
131
+ - Keyword overlap: which non-brand terms do you both target?
132
+ - Keyword gaps: terms competitors rank for that you don't target
133
+ - Match type strategy: estimated match types from ad triggers
134
+
135
+ ### 5. Spend Estimation
136
+ - Meta Ad Library shows spend ranges for political/social ads
137
+ - Google Auction Insights + impression share = directional spend estimate
138
+ - Third-party tools (SEMrush, SpyFu) for more precise estimates
139
+ - Manual estimation formula:
140
+ ```
141
+ Estimated Monthly Spend = Impressions × CPM / 1000
142
+ or
143
+ Estimated Monthly Spend = Clicks × Estimated CPC
144
+ ```
145
+
146
+ ## Gap & Opportunity Identification
147
+
148
+ ### Platform Gaps
149
+ - Which platforms are competitors NOT on? (opportunity to own)
150
+ - Which platforms are they underspending on? (opportunity to outspend)
151
+
152
+ ### Messaging Gaps
153
+ - What customer pain points are NO competitors addressing?
154
+ - What value propositions are underrepresented in the market?
155
+ - What content formats are competitors not using?
156
+
157
+ ### Audience Gaps
158
+ - What demographics/segments are competitors not targeting?
159
+ - What geographic markets are underserved?
160
+ - What funnel stages are competitors neglecting?
161
+
162
+ ### Creative Gaps
163
+ - What ad formats are competitors not using? (video, UGC, Spark Ads)
164
+ - What creative styles are missing from the competitive landscape?
165
+ - What platform-specific features are competitors not leveraging?
166
+
167
+ ## Competitive Response Strategy
168
+
169
+ ### When Competitors Bid on Your Brand
170
+ - Always run brand campaigns to defend (low CPC, high CTR)
171
+ - Dynamic keyword insertion to show your brand prominently
172
+ - Sitelinks to key pages (pricing, features, reviews)
173
+ - Ad copy that emphasizes unique differentiators
174
+ - Consider bidding on competitor brand terms (know the rules)
175
+
176
+ ### When You're Outspent
177
+ - Focus on efficiency over volume (better targeting, creative, landing pages)
178
+ - Target long-tail keywords competitors ignore
179
+ - Use Exact match for precision (less waste)
180
+ - Double down on retargeting (lower CPA than prospecting)
181
+ - Compete on creative quality, not budget
182
+
183
+ ## Output
184
+
185
+ ### Deliverables
186
+ - `COMPETITOR-INTELLIGENCE-REPORT.md`: Full competitive analysis
187
+ - Per-competitor ad presence summary
188
+ - Ad copy and messaging analysis
189
+ - Creative strategy comparison
190
+ - Estimated spend levels
191
+ - Keyword overlap and gaps
192
+ - `COMPETITIVE-GAPS.md`: Opportunities identified from competitor analysis
193
+ - Platform gaps
194
+ - Messaging opportunities
195
+ - Audience segments to target
196
+ - Creative format opportunities
197
+ - Strategic recommendations for competitive positioning
198
+ - Priority actions to gain competitive advantage
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: ads-create
3
+ version: 1.5.0
4
+ description: "Campaign concept and copy brief generator for paid advertising. Reads brand-profile.json and optional audit results to produce structured campaign concepts, messaging pillars, and copy briefs. Outputs campaign-brief.md to the current directory. Run after /ads dna and before /ads generate. Triggers on: create campaign, campaign brief, ad concepts, write ad copy, campaign strategy, ad messaging, creative brief, generate concepts."
5
+ user-invokable: false
6
+ ---
7
+
8
+ # Ads Create: Campaign Concept & Copy Brief Generator
9
+
10
+ Generates structured campaign concepts and platform-specific copy from your brand
11
+ profile and optional audit data. Outputs `campaign-brief.md` for use by `/ads generate`.
12
+
13
+ ## Quick Reference
14
+
15
+ | Command | What it does |
16
+ |---------|-------------|
17
+ | `/ads create` | Full campaign brief → `campaign-brief.md` |
18
+ | `/ads create --platforms meta google` | Brief for specific platforms only |
19
+ | `/ads create --objective leads` | Brief optimized for lead generation |
20
+
21
+ ## Process
22
+
23
+ ### Step 1: Check for Brand Profile
24
+
25
+ Look for `brand-profile.json` in the current directory.
26
+
27
+ - **Found**: Load and proceed.
28
+ - **Not found**: Ask the user:
29
+ > "I don't see a brand-profile.json in this directory. Would you like to:
30
+ > 1. Run `/ads dna <url>` first to extract brand DNA automatically
31
+ > 2. Describe your brand manually (I'll create a basic profile from your description)"
32
+
33
+ If the user chooses manual, collect:
34
+ - Brand name and website
35
+ - Primary color (or "unsure")
36
+ - 3 words that describe the brand voice
37
+ - Target audience (age, role, key pain point)
38
+ - Main product/service offering
39
+
40
+ ### Step 2: Check for Audit Results
41
+
42
+ Look for `ADS-AUDIT-REPORT.md` or any `*-audit-results.md` in the current directory.
43
+
44
+ - **Found**: Read them. Note the top 3 weaknesses (creative fatigue, tracking gaps, wasted spend) to address in concepts.
45
+ - **Not found**: Continue without. Note in the brief: "No audit data found; concepts are generalized. Run `/ads audit` for weakness-targeted concepts."
46
+
47
+ ### Step 3: Collect Campaign Parameters
48
+
49
+ If `--platforms` or `--objective` flags were provided in the command, use those values
50
+ and skip the corresponding questions below.
51
+
52
+ Ask (combine into one message; omit any already provided via flags):
53
+ 1. **Platforms**: Which ad platforms? (Meta · Google · LinkedIn · TikTok · YouTube · Microsoft · All)
54
+ 2. **Objective**: Sales/Revenue · Leads/Demos · App Installs · Brand Awareness · Retargeting
55
+ 3. **Offer or brief**: Any specific offer, promotion, or message to highlight? (optional)
56
+ 4. **Number of concepts**: How many campaign concepts? (default: 3)
57
+
58
+ ### Step 4: Select Copy Framework
59
+
60
+ Read `ads-agents/references/copy-frameworks.md` and recommend a framework based on
61
+ campaign goal + platform + audience temperature:
62
+
63
+ | Framework | Best For |
64
+ |-----------|----------|
65
+ | AIDA (Attention, Interest, Desire, Action) | Cold audiences, awareness campaigns |
66
+ | PAS (Problem, Agitate, Solve) | Pain-point products, problem-aware audiences |
67
+ | BAB (Before, After, Bridge) | Transformation offers, coaching, fitness |
68
+ | 4P (Promise, Picture, Proof, Push) | Direct response, high-intent audiences |
69
+ | FAB (Features, Advantages, Benefits) | Product-focused, comparison shoppers |
70
+ | Star-Story-Solution | Brand storytelling, warm audiences |
71
+
72
+ Include the selected framework name in campaign-brief.md for the copy-writer agent.
73
+
74
+ ### Step 5: Spawn Creative Agents in Sequence
75
+
76
+ Agents must run **sequentially**; `copy-writer` reads the file that `creative-strategist`
77
+ writes, so running them in parallel creates a race condition on `campaign-brief.md`.
78
+
79
+ **Step 5a; Spawn `creative-strategist`** (Task tool):
80
+ This agent creates `campaign-brief.md` and writes the strategic sections:
81
+ `## Brand DNA Summary`, `## Campaign Concepts`, `## Image Generation Briefs`, `## Next Steps`.
82
+
83
+ Additional instructions for `creative-strategist`:
84
+ - For e-commerce businesses, also read `ads-agents/skills/ads-plan/assets/ecommerce-creative.md`
85
+ and select the appropriate creative playbook (Product Launch, Sale/Promotion,
86
+ Seasonal, Retargeting, Brand Awareness)
87
+ - Include banana domain mode recommendations in each Image Generation Brief
88
+ (Product, Editorial, Cinema, UI/Web, or Portrait)
89
+
90
+ Wait for `creative-strategist` to **fully complete** before continuing.
91
+
92
+ **Step 5b; Spawn `copy-writer`** (Task tool):
93
+ After `creative-strategist` completes, spawn `copy-writer`. It reads the existing
94
+ `campaign-brief.md` and appends the `## Copy Deck` section with platform-specific
95
+ headlines, primary text, and CTAs.
96
+
97
+ Additional instructions for `copy-writer`:
98
+ - Read `ads-agents/references/copy-frameworks.md` and apply the selected framework
99
+ structure to all ad copy
100
+ - Generate 2 framework variants per platform: primary (recommended framework)
101
+ + secondary (alternative for A/B testing)
102
+
103
+ Wait for `copy-writer` to complete before proceeding to Step 6.
104
+
105
+ ### Step 6: Review and Present
106
+
107
+ After both agents complete, confirm `campaign-brief.md` exists and is complete.
108
+
109
+ Present a summary to the user:
110
+ ```
111
+ ✓ campaign-brief.md generated
112
+
113
+ Summary:
114
+ Concepts: [N] campaign concepts created
115
+ Platforms: [list]
116
+ Copy deck: Headlines, primary text, and CTAs for each concept × platform
117
+ Image briefs: [N] image generation briefs ready
118
+
119
+ Next steps:
120
+ 1. Review campaign-brief.md and adjust any messaging
121
+ 2. Run `/ads generate` to produce AI images from the briefs
122
+ 3. Upload copy and assets to your ad platforms
123
+ ```
124
+
125
+ ## campaign-brief.md Format Specification
126
+
127
+ The following section headings are a **parsing contract**; agents downstream depend on these exact heading names.
128
+
129
+ ```markdown
130
+ # Campaign Brief: [brand_name]
131
+ **Generated:** [date]
132
+ **Website:** [website_url]
133
+ **Platforms:** [comma-separated list]
134
+ **Objective:** [objective]
135
+ **Concepts:** [N]
136
+
137
+ ## Brand DNA Summary
138
+ [3-sentence synthesis of brand-profile.json: voice, visual identity, target audience]
139
+
140
+ ## Audit Context
141
+ [If audit data found: top 3 weaknesses being addressed]
142
+ [If no audit data: "No audit data; run /ads audit for weakness-targeted concepts"]
143
+
144
+ ## Campaign Concepts
145
+
146
+ ### Concept 1: [Name]
147
+ **Hypothesis:** [why this will work; 1 sentence]
148
+ **Primary Message:** [core message; 1 sentence]
149
+ **Tone:** [voice reading from brand-profile.json]
150
+ **Visual Direction:** [2-3 sentences describing imagery]
151
+ **Target Platforms:** [platforms and rationale]
152
+ **CTA:** [call to action text]
153
+ **Addresses:** [audit finding or "general brand awareness"]
154
+
155
+ ### Concept 2: [Name]
156
+ [same structure]
157
+
158
+ [repeat for all concepts]
159
+
160
+ ## Copy Deck
161
+ [appended by copy-writer agent; headlines, primary text, CTAs per concept per platform]
162
+
163
+ ## Image Generation Briefs
164
+
165
+ ### Brief 1: [Concept Name]: [Platform]
166
+ **Prompt:** [exact generation prompt]
167
+ **Dimensions:** [WxH]
168
+ **Safe zone notes:** [constraint or "None"]
169
+
170
+ ### Brief 2: [Concept Name]: [Platform]
171
+ **Prompt:** [exact generation prompt]
172
+ **Dimensions:** [WxH]
173
+ **Safe zone notes:** [constraint or "None"]
174
+
175
+ [one brief per concept × platform combination]
176
+
177
+ ## Next Steps
178
+ 1. Review all concepts and select which to move forward with
179
+ 2. Run `/ads generate` to produce images from the briefs above
180
+ 3. Adjust CTAs and offers in the copy deck for your specific promotion
181
+ 4. Upload final assets to your ad platform managers
182
+ ```
183
+
184
+ ## Quality Gates
185
+
186
+ - **Minimum 3 concepts** (unless user requests fewer)
187
+ - **Distinct angles**: no two concepts share the same primary message angle
188
+ - **Platform fit**: concepts targeting TikTok must acknowledge vertical-only format and sound-on context
189
+ - **Offer anchoring**: if the user provided a specific offer, at least 1 concept must lead with it
190
+ - **Image briefs**: every concept must have at least one image brief per requested platform
191
+
192
+ ## Meta Andromeda Optimization
193
+
194
+ For Meta campaigns: recommend diverse creative concepts (different motivators, visual styles, messaging angles) to maximize Andromeda retrieval. Similarity Score >60% between ads triggers clustering and suppression.
195
+
196
+ ## Platform Character Limits
197
+
198
+ Verify platform character limits are current. Meta reduced headline display length on mobile in 2025.
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: ads-creative
3
+ version: 1.6.0
4
+ description: "Cross-platform creative quality audit covering ad copy, video, image, and format diversity across all platforms. Detects creative fatigue, evaluates platform-native compliance, and provides production priorities. Use when user says creative audit, ad creative, creative fatigue, ad copy, ad design, or creative review."
5
+ user-invokable: false
6
+ ---
7
+
8
+ <!-- Updated: 2026-05-14 | v1.6: Andromeda 2026 (8-12 distinct concepts × 2-3 variations, similarity <40%, 2-3 week fatigue, 20+ tests/month), Meta Creative Similarity Score now visible in Ads Manager -->
9
+
10
+ # Cross-Platform Creative Quality Audit
11
+
12
+ ## Process
13
+
14
+ 1. Collect creative assets or performance data from active platforms
15
+ 2. Read `ads-agents/references/platform-specs.md` for creative specifications
16
+ 3. Read `ads-agents/references/benchmarks.md` for CTR/engagement benchmarks
17
+ 4. Read `ads-agents/references/scoring-system.md` for weighted scoring algorithm
18
+ 5. **Validate**: confirm at least one platform has creative data (assets or performance metrics) before proceeding
19
+ 6. Evaluate creative quality per platform
20
+ 7. Assess cross-platform creative consistency
21
+ 8. **Validate**: verify fatigue signals reference actual performance trends, not assumptions
22
+ 9. Generate production priority recommendations
23
+
24
+ ## Per-Platform Assessment
25
+
26
+ ### Google Ads Creative
27
+ - RSA: ≥8 unique headlines, ≥3 descriptions per ad group
28
+ - RSA ad strength: "Good" or "Excellent"
29
+ - Pin usage: minimal and strategic (over-pinning kills RSA flexibility)
30
+ - Extensions: sitelinks (≥4), callouts (≥4), structured snippets, image
31
+ - PMax asset groups: text + image + video + optional product feed
32
+ - YouTube: video quality, hook, subtitles (see ads-youtube sub-skill)
33
+
34
+ ### Meta Ads Creative (Andromeda 2026)
35
+ - Format diversity: ≥3 formats active (image, video, carousel, collection)
36
+ - Creative volume: **target 8-12 conceptually distinct concepts** per campaign × 2-3 variations each (Andromeda standard). Top-third advertisers run ~395 live ads at any time
37
+ - Fatigue detection: CTR declining >10% week-over-week OR >20% over 14 days = FAIL. **Andromeda fatigue window: 2-3 weeks** (down from 6+ pre-Andromeda)
38
+ - High-spend accounts (>$5K/month): 5-15 new creatives/week required
39
+ - Creative Similarity Score (visible in Ads Manager): keep **<40%** across active assets; >60% triggers retrieval suppression
40
+ - Video length: 15s max Stories/Reels, 30s max Feed
41
+ - UGC/testimonial content tested AND mixed with polished brand assets (both belong in rotation)
42
+ - Advantage+ Creative enhancements enabled (~22% ROAS lift vs manual)
43
+ - Headline under 40 chars, primary text under 125 chars
44
+ - Variations must differ at visual/audio/structural level (not just headline swaps)
45
+
46
+ ### LinkedIn Creative
47
+ - Thought Leader Ads active, ≥30% budget for B2B
48
+ - Format diversity: ≥2 formats tested (single image, carousel, video, document)
49
+ - Video ads tested
50
+ - Creative refresh: every 4-6 weeks
51
+ - Professional tone appropriate for platform
52
+
53
+ ### TikTok Creative
54
+ - ≥6 creatives per ad group (Critical requirement)
55
+ - All video 9:16 vertical 1080x1920 (non-negotiable)
56
+ - Native-looking content (not corporate)
57
+ - Hook in first 1-2 seconds
58
+ - No creative active >7 days with declining CTR
59
+ - Spark Ads tested (~3% CTR vs ~2% standard)
60
+ - Sound-on optimization (never silent)
61
+ - Safe zone compliance: X:40-940, Y:150-1470
62
+ - Trending audio used
63
+
64
+ ### Microsoft Creative
65
+ - RSA: ≥8 headlines, ≥3 descriptions
66
+ - Multimedia Ads tested (unique rich format)
67
+ - Ad copy optimized for Bing demographics (older, higher income, professional)
68
+ - Action Extension utilized (unique to Microsoft)
69
+ - Filter Link Extension tested
70
+
71
+ ## Creative Fatigue Detection
72
+
73
+ ### Signals of Fatigue
74
+ | Signal | Threshold | Action |
75
+ |--------|-----------|--------|
76
+ | CTR declining | >20% over 14 days | Refresh creative |
77
+ | Frequency (Meta) | >5.0 prospecting, >12.0 retargeting | New audience or creative |
78
+ | Watch time declining (TikTok) | <3s average | New hook needed |
79
+ | QS declining (Google) | Drop of 2+ points | Refresh ad copy |
80
+ | Engagement rate drop | >30% decline | Full creative overhaul |
81
+
82
+ ### Refresh Cadence by Platform (2026 — Andromeda compressed Meta windows)
83
+ | Platform | Recommended Refresh |
84
+ |----------|-------------------|
85
+ | TikTok | Every 7-10 days (fastest fatigue) |
86
+ | Meta | Every 2-3 weeks (Andromeda compressed; was 14-21d) |
87
+ | Meta (high spend >$5K/mo) | 5-15 new creatives per week |
88
+ | LinkedIn Standard | Every 4-6 weeks |
89
+ | LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads | Let winners run — peak CTR weeks 8-12, rotate ~week 18 |
90
+ | Google Search | Every 8-12 weeks |
91
+ | Microsoft | Every 8-12 weeks |
92
+ | YouTube | Every 4-8 weeks |
93
+
94
+ ## Format Diversity Matrix
95
+
96
+ Evaluate which formats are active per platform:
97
+
98
+ | Format | Google | Meta | LinkedIn | TikTok | Microsoft |
99
+ |--------|--------|------|----------|--------|-----------|
100
+ | Static Image | RSA image ext | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | Multimedia |
101
+ | Video | YouTube, PMax | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (required) | ✅ (9:16 vertical, April 2025) |
102
+ | Carousel | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
103
+ | Collection | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
104
+ | Document | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
105
+ | Shopping | PMax, Shopping | Catalog | ❌ | Shop | Shopping |
106
+
107
+ **Apple Ads Format Support:**
108
+
109
+ | Format | Apple Ads |
110
+ |--------|-----------|
111
+ | Static Image | ✅ (Custom Product Pages) |
112
+ | Video | ✅ (App preview videos) |
113
+ | Search Tab | ✅ (banner) |
114
+ | Today Tab | ✅ (editorial-style) |
115
+
116
+ ## Andromeda Creative Similarity Score (Meta — 2026)
117
+
118
+ Meta's Andromeda engine (global rollout complete October 2025) clusters ads with
119
+ >60% similarity under a single Entity ID and suppresses delivery. 100 minor
120
+ variations (color swaps, small text changes) perform no better than 10 genuinely
121
+ distinct creatives. **Creative Similarity Score is now visible in Ads Manager.**
122
+
123
+ **Thresholds:**
124
+ - >60% similarity = retrieval suppression (ads compete with each other, not expand reach)
125
+ - <40% similarity = recommended target across active assets
126
+ - Variations must register at visual / audio / structural level, not just copy
127
+
128
+ **Evaluate:**
129
+ - Are creatives genuinely diverse in concept, angle, and format?
130
+ - Are creatives passing the **8-12 distinct concepts × 2-3 variations** test?
131
+ - Flag accounts relying on iterative variations rather than distinct concepts
132
+ - Recommend testing fundamentally different hooks, formats, emotional triggers, and value propositions (not just A/B'd copy)
133
+ - Are brands testing 20+ new ads/month? (Below 10 = 65% lower ROAS vs above 20)
134
+
135
+ ## Symphony Automation Awareness (TikTok, 2025)
136
+
137
+ TikTok's Symphony AI (2025) generates creative variations from product URLs. Assess:
138
+ - Whether account uses AI-generated vs original creatives
139
+ - Quality and performance comparison of Symphony vs manual creatives
140
+ - Impact on creative refresh strategy (Symphony can accelerate iteration)
141
+
142
+ ## Creative Health Scoring Weights
143
+
144
+ ```
145
+ Format Diversity: 25% ████████░░
146
+ Fatigue Signals: 25% ████████░░
147
+ Platform Compliance: 20% ██████░░░░
148
+ Refresh Cadence: 15% █████░░░░░
149
+ Volume: 15% █████░░░░░
150
+ ```
151
+
152
+ Grade: A (90-100), B (75-89), C (60-74), D (40-59), F (<40).
153
+
154
+ ## Creative Check IDs
155
+
156
+ | ID | Check | Severity |
157
+ |----|-------|----------|
158
+ | CR-01 | Format diversity: >=3 formats per platform | High |
159
+ | CR-02 | Creative volume: meets platform minimums | High |
160
+ | CR-03 | Fatigue detection: CTR/engagement declining past thresholds | Critical |
161
+ | CR-04 | Refresh cadence: within platform-recommended cycle | High |
162
+ | CR-05 | Platform compliance: specs, safe zones, text limits | Critical |
163
+ | CR-06 | Hook quality: first 1-5s engagement (video) or headline impact (static) | High |
164
+ | CR-07 | UGC ratio: UGC/testimonial content tested on Meta and TikTok | Medium |
165
+ | CR-08 | Video specs: codec, resolution, aspect ratio per platform | Medium |
166
+ | CR-09 | Safe zone compliance: critical elements within 900x1000px usable area | Medium |
167
+ | CR-10 | Andromeda diversity: genuinely distinct concepts, not iterative variations (Meta) | High |
168
+
169
+ ## Universal Creative Best Practices
170
+
171
+ ### Cross-Platform Safe Zone
172
+ - 900x1000px usable area works across all vertical placements
173
+ - Keep critical elements centered and within safe margins
174
+ - Test on mobile devices (75%+ of ad impressions are mobile)
175
+
176
+ ### Ad Copy Principles
177
+ - Lead with benefit, not feature
178
+ - Include clear CTA (what should they do next?)
179
+ - Match ad message to landing page (message match)
180
+ - Use numbers and specifics over vague claims
181
+ - Test emotional vs rational appeals
182
+
183
+ ### Video Production Standards
184
+ - H.264 codec, AAC audio, MP4 container
185
+ - Minimum 720p (1080p preferred)
186
+ - Subtitles/captions always (accessibility + sound-off viewing)
187
+ - Brand mention within first 5s (awareness) or at CTA (performance)
188
+
189
+ ## Output
190
+
191
+ ### Creative Quality Report
192
+
193
+ ```
194
+ Cross-Platform Creative Health
195
+
196
+ Google: ████████░░ X/X checks passing
197
+ Meta: ██████████ X/X checks passing
198
+ LinkedIn: ███████░░░ X/X checks passing
199
+ TikTok: █████░░░░░ X/X checks passing
200
+ Microsoft: ████████░░ X/X checks passing
201
+ ```
202
+
203
+ ### Deliverables
204
+ - `CREATIVE-AUDIT-REPORT.md`: Per-platform creative assessment
205
+ - Fatigue alerts (any creative past refresh cadence)
206
+ - Format diversity gaps per platform
207
+ - Production priority list (most impactful creative to produce next)
208
+ - Quick Wins (format conversions, CTA changes, Spark Ads setup)