skill-systems-thinking 0.1.0 → 0.1.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -1,51 +1,51 @@
1
- # Change Proposal (control-systems thinking scaffold)
2
-
3
- Fill this in before a non-trivial change. It forces the control-theoretic mindset: name the
4
- plant, the setpoint, the actuator, and how you will know it converged.
5
-
6
- ## Target
7
- - **Controlled variable x** (what must stay correct):
8
- _________________________________
9
- - **Setpoint x*** (target / invariant / acceptable range):
10
- _________________________________
11
-
12
- ## Plant & model
13
- - **Current behavior** (measured, not assumed):
14
- _________________________________
15
- - **Mental model of the plant** (and where it may be wrong):
16
- _________________________________
17
- - **Model validity range** (inputs/sizes/conditions where the model holds):
18
- _________________________________
19
-
20
- ## Control action
21
- - **Control variable u** (the lever I will change):
22
- _________________________________
23
- - **Bounds on u** (max retries / depth / rate / size):
24
- _________________________________
25
- - **Sensors** (how I will observe x after the change — tests/logs/metrics):
26
- _________________________________
27
-
28
- ## Disturbances
29
- - **Known external kicks** (load, network, other services):
30
- _________________________________
31
- - **Feedforward (if measurable)** / **feedback only (if not)**:
32
- _________________________________
33
-
34
- ## Convergence
35
- - **Pass condition** (bounded deviation ||ε|| under which perturbation?):
36
- _________________________________
37
- - **Test / observation that proves it**:
38
- _________________________________
39
-
40
- ## Coupling
41
- - **Subsystems that must stay separate** (decouple harmful coupling):
42
- _________________________________
43
- - **Subsystems that must stay coordinated** (keep beneficial coupling, regulate relations):
44
- _________________________________
45
-
46
- ---
47
- Anti-patterns to avoid:
48
- - Unbounded retry/recursion/allocation → saturation → instability
49
- - Feature creep before the base is stable → divergence
50
- - Optimization before correctness → wrong trajectory
51
- - Guessing the cause without measurement → open-loop patch
1
+ # Change Proposal (control-systems thinking scaffold)
2
+
3
+ Fill this in before a non-trivial change. It forces the control-theoretic mindset: name the
4
+ plant, the setpoint, the actuator, and how you will know it converged.
5
+
6
+ ## Target
7
+ - **Controlled variable x** (what must stay correct):
8
+ _________________________________
9
+ - **Setpoint x*** (target / invariant / acceptable range):
10
+ _________________________________
11
+
12
+ ## Plant & model
13
+ - **Current behavior** (measured, not assumed):
14
+ _________________________________
15
+ - **Mental model of the plant** (and where it may be wrong):
16
+ _________________________________
17
+ - **Model validity range** (inputs/sizes/conditions where the model holds):
18
+ _________________________________
19
+
20
+ ## Control action
21
+ - **Control variable u** (the lever I will change):
22
+ _________________________________
23
+ - **Bounds on u** (max retries / depth / rate / size):
24
+ _________________________________
25
+ - **Sensors** (how I will observe x after the change — tests/logs/metrics):
26
+ _________________________________
27
+
28
+ ## Disturbances
29
+ - **Known external kicks** (load, network, other services):
30
+ _________________________________
31
+ - **Feedforward (if measurable)** / **feedback only (if not)**:
32
+ _________________________________
33
+
34
+ ## Convergence
35
+ - **Pass condition** (bounded deviation ||ε|| under which perturbation?):
36
+ _________________________________
37
+ - **Test / observation that proves it**:
38
+ _________________________________
39
+
40
+ ## Coupling
41
+ - **Subsystems that must stay separate** (decouple harmful coupling):
42
+ _________________________________
43
+ - **Subsystems that must stay coordinated** (keep beneficial coupling, regulate relations):
44
+ _________________________________
45
+
46
+ ---
47
+ Anti-patterns to avoid:
48
+ - Unbounded retry/recursion/allocation → saturation → instability
49
+ - Feature creep before the base is stable → divergence
50
+ - Optimization before correctness → wrong trajectory
51
+ - Guessing the cause without measurement → open-loop patch
@@ -1,44 +1,44 @@
1
- # Debugging Checklist (closed-loop thinking mode)
2
-
3
- This checklist is a **prompt scaffold for the LLM's internal loop** during debugging.
4
- Work top to bottom; do not skip steps. If you find yourself on step 4 without a clear x
5
- and u, return to step 1.
6
-
7
- ## 1. Identify (state & control)
8
- - [ ] **Controlled variable x**: what must stay correct? Name it concretely, with a target/units.
9
- - [ ] **Control variable u**: what lever will I actually change? (Not "rewrite"; the smallest editable thing.)
10
- - [ ] **Observability**: do I have a sensor (log/test/metric) that reveals x? If not → add it first.
11
- - [ ] **Bounds**: what are the limits on u and x? Size, rate, time, memory, retries, context.
12
-
13
- ## 2. Analyze (current behavior)
14
- - [ ] Reproduced the fault deterministically? (Not "sometimes".)
15
- - [ ] Measured the deviation ε = x* − x? Stated the mental model of the plant and where it breaks.
16
- - [ ] Located the fault to a subsystem (not guessed).
17
-
18
- ## 3. Stabilize (before any feature)
19
- - [ ] Tested with perturbations: empty / huge / null / concurrent / dependency-down / load spike.
20
- - [ ] No unbounded growth, oscillation, or limit cycle?
21
- - [ ] If unstable → fixed stability before adding anything.
22
-
23
- ## 4. Synthesize (minimal control action)
24
- - [ ] Change is the smallest u that moves x to target. No speculative extras.
25
- - [ ] Decoupled harmful coupling; kept beneficial coupling (coordination, not over-decoupling).
26
-
27
- ## 5. Close the loop (observe & correct)
28
- - [ ] Ran the actual code; read the actual sensor output — did NOT assume u worked.
29
- - [ ] Corrections are getting smaller, not larger.
30
- - [ ] Reached target within stated bounds.
31
-
32
- ## 6. Compensate & clamp
33
- - [ ] Measurable disturbances handled by feedforward where possible; feedback the rest.
34
- - [ ] Control magnitude clamped (max retries/depth/rate). Graceful degradation at the bound.
35
-
36
- ## 7. Optimize (last)
37
- - [ ] Only now tuning speed/cost/elegance. Stability and correctness already proven.
38
-
39
- ---
40
- Anti-patterns (stop if you catch yourself):
41
- - Adding retries without a bound → retry storm (unstable delay loop)
42
- - Cranking gain on a delayed system → oscillation
43
- - Optimizing before stabilizing → divergence on perturbation
44
- - Guessing cause without reproduction → open-loop patch
1
+ # Debugging Checklist (closed-loop thinking mode)
2
+
3
+ This checklist is a **prompt scaffold for the LLM's internal loop** during debugging.
4
+ Work top to bottom; do not skip steps. If you find yourself on step 4 without a clear x
5
+ and u, return to step 1.
6
+
7
+ ## 1. Identify (state & control)
8
+ - [ ] **Controlled variable x**: what must stay correct? Name it concretely, with a target/units.
9
+ - [ ] **Control variable u**: what lever will I actually change? (Not "rewrite"; the smallest editable thing.)
10
+ - [ ] **Observability**: do I have a sensor (log/test/metric) that reveals x? If not → add it first.
11
+ - [ ] **Bounds**: what are the limits on u and x? Size, rate, time, memory, retries, context.
12
+
13
+ ## 2. Analyze (current behavior)
14
+ - [ ] Reproduced the fault deterministically? (Not "sometimes".)
15
+ - [ ] Measured the deviation ε = x* − x? Stated the mental model of the plant and where it breaks.
16
+ - [ ] Located the fault to a subsystem (not guessed).
17
+
18
+ ## 3. Stabilize (before any feature)
19
+ - [ ] Tested with perturbations: empty / huge / null / concurrent / dependency-down / load spike.
20
+ - [ ] No unbounded growth, oscillation, or limit cycle?
21
+ - [ ] If unstable → fixed stability before adding anything.
22
+
23
+ ## 4. Synthesize (minimal control action)
24
+ - [ ] Change is the smallest u that moves x to target. No speculative extras.
25
+ - [ ] Decoupled harmful coupling; kept beneficial coupling (coordination, not over-decoupling).
26
+
27
+ ## 5. Close the loop (observe & correct)
28
+ - [ ] Ran the actual code; read the actual sensor output — did NOT assume u worked.
29
+ - [ ] Corrections are getting smaller, not larger.
30
+ - [ ] Reached target within stated bounds.
31
+
32
+ ## 6. Compensate & clamp
33
+ - [ ] Measurable disturbances handled by feedforward where possible; feedback the rest.
34
+ - [ ] Control magnitude clamped (max retries/depth/rate). Graceful degradation at the bound.
35
+
36
+ ## 7. Optimize (last)
37
+ - [ ] Only now tuning speed/cost/elegance. Stability and correctness already proven.
38
+
39
+ ---
40
+ Anti-patterns (stop if you catch yourself):
41
+ - Adding retries without a bound → retry storm (unstable delay loop)
42
+ - Cranking gain on a delayed system → oscillation
43
+ - Optimizing before stabilizing → divergence on perturbation
44
+ - Guessing cause without reproduction → open-loop patch