skill-systems-thinking 0.1.0 → 0.1.2

package/README.md

@@ -1,396 +1,470 @@
-# systems-thinking
-
-<!-- Language toggle / 语言切换 -->
-
-> **中文** | [English](#english)
-
----
-
-## 简介
-
-`systems-thinking` 是一个思维模式 skill。它把控制论的思想装进 LLM 的思考过程里，让模型在写代码、改代码、做架构之前，先想清楚：状态是什么、怎么观测、稳不稳定、边界在哪、耦合怎么处理。
-
-> **一句话：用系统视角写代码——先识别状态，再动手，最后闭环验证。**
-
-这不是给人类做的知识测试，也不是一本排错手册。它是一个脚手架，改变的是模型**怎么想**，而不是怎么拼 diff。
-
-源自钱学森、宋健《工程控制论》。语言和框架无关，拿来就能用。
-
-## 它解决什么问题
-
-写代码时常见的做法是：先动手，再祈祷测试能过。这个 skill 要改变的是这个顺序。
-
-它特别适合这些场景：
-
-- 改一段你不完全理解的遗留代码
-- 调试一个时好时坏、复现不了的问题
-- 重构几个互相牵制的模块
-- 做任何"既要正确又要稳"的改动
-
-在这些场景里，"写个最小补丁"往往不够。你需要先搞清楚系统的状态，再动手。
-
-## 核心思想
-
-一句话：**程序是一个动态系统，你是控制器。**
-
-每次改动都在往系统里注入一个控制信号。你只能部分观测系统的真实状态。bug 是不稳定或欠阻尼的轨迹。调试就是状态估计。测试是反馈回路的传感器。**闭环永远比开环好。**
-
-## 安装
-
-本 skill 面向支持自定义 skill 的 AI 编程助手（Kilo、Claude Code、Aider、Cursor 等）。
-
-### 直接复制
-
-```bash
-cp -r systems-thinking <agent-skills-dir>/
-```
-
-### 符号链接（开发用）
-
-```bash
-ln -s /absolute/path/to/systems-thinking <agent-skills-dir>/
-```
-
-### 各助手路径参考
-
-| 助手 | 路径 |
-|---|---|
-| Kilo | `~/.config/kilo/skills/` 或项目内 `.kilo/agent/` |
-| Claude Code | `~/.claude/plugins/custom-skills/` 或项目内 `.claude/` |
-| Aider | 使用 `--skills-dir` 参数 |
-| Cursor | 项目内 `.cursor/rules/` 或全局设置 |
-
-### 验证安装
-
-```bash
-pwsh init.ps1
-```
-
-看到 `Verification Complete — OK` 就说明装好了。
-
-## 使用方式
-
-### 1. 触发时机
-
-在涉及以下任务时加载本 skill：
-
-- 架构设计
-- 调试非确定性行为
-- 跨模块重构
-- 任何"正确且稳健必须同时满足"的改动
-
-### 2. 读 SKILL.md
-
-先读 `SKILL.md`，里面的运行时提示块会安装认知法则。下面的工作流是自然延伸。
-
-### 3. 动手之前，先命名
-
-改代码之前，必须说清楚四个东西：
-
-- `x` — 被控变量，什么必须保持正确
-- `u` — 控制变量，你实际会动的那个杠杆
-- 可观测性 — 你怎么知道 `x` 的当前值
-- 边界 — 每个执行器都会饱和，不接受无界循环
-
-### 4. 七步循环
-
-| 步骤 | 原则 | 参考文件 |
-|---|---|---|
-| 1 | 识别：命名 `x`、`u`、可观测性、边界 | `references/state-and-control.md` |
-| 2 | 分析：复现、测量、定位故障、建立模型 | `references/modeling.md` |
-| 3 | 稳定：在加新功能之前先消灭发散/振荡/泄露 | `references/stability.md` |
-| 4 | 综合：最小 `u`；解耦有害，协调有益 | `references/multivariable.md` |
-| 5 | 闭环：观察实际结果，修正直到偏差有界 | `references/closed-loop-workflow.md` |
-| 6 | 补偿：可测扰动用前馈；有延迟就加阻尼 | `references/disturbance.md` |
-| 7 | 优化：稳定之后才谈性能调优 | `references/bounded-control.md` |
-
-涉及采样和测试节奏的问题，额外参考 `references/discrete-systems.md`。
-
-### 5. 模板
-
-以下文件位于 skill 安装目录下的 `templates/` 子目录中：
-
-- **调试时**：把 `templates/debugging-checklist.md` 复制进会话
-- **规划改动时**：用 `templates/change-proposal.md` 写控制计划
-
-### 6. 自审计
-
-宣布完成之前，必须通过 `evals/checks.json` 中所有的 MUST 检查项。
-
-## 认知法则
-
-这个 skill 强制执行 8 条认知法则：
-
-1. 先命名 `x` 再命名 `u`。没名字的目标就没法调节。
-2. 先观测再猜测。综合方案之前先测量当前行为。
-3. 稳定优先于优化。扰动下发散就是失败。
-4. 闭环。观察实际结果，不断修正直到偏差有界。
-5. 可测扰动用前馈，其余用反馈。绝不在延迟回路上提高增益。
-6. 解耦有害耦合，协调有益耦合。调节关系，不只是绝对值。
-7. 最小控制。移动 `x` 到目标所需的最小 `u`，不搞投机性额外操作。
-8. 收敛。修正幅度必须越来越小。如果越来越大，说明不稳定——停下来重新识别。
-
-## 工作示例
-
-**问题**：一个 API 接口在负载下间歇性返回 500。
-
-| 步骤 | 控制论行动 |
-|---|---|
-| 识别 | `x` = 错误率；`u` = 重试/超时/缓存逻辑；边界 = 请求预算。 |
-| 分析 | 在负载下复现；测量错误率随并发上升（不稳定）。 |
-| 稳定 | 加熔断器 + 带退避的有界重试 → 错误率有界。 |
-| 综合 | 最小改动，不要重写服务。 |
-| 闭环 | 再次压测；错误率收敛到接近 0。 |
-| 补偿 | 对可测依赖故障快速失败（前馈）+ 其余用反馈。 |
-| 优化 | 此时才 trim p99 延迟。 |
-
-**没有这套视角的常见失败**：无限制加重试 → 重试风暴（不稳定延迟环）→ 比原来更糟。
-
-## 参考文件
-
-8 篇深度参考，每篇对应一个控制论原则，附带 LLM 行为模式说明：
-
-| 主题 | 文件 |
-|---|---|
-| 闭环工作流 | `references/closed-loop-workflow.md` |
-| 状态、控制、可观测性、边界 | `references/state-and-control.md` |
-| 稳定性 | `references/stability.md` |
-| 建模与模型有效性 | `references/modeling.md` |
-| 多变量：解耦与协调 | `references/multivariable.md` |
-| 扰动补偿与时延 | `references/disturbance.md` |
-| 有界控制 | `references/bounded-control.md` |
-| 离散系统与测试节奏 | `references/discrete-systems.md` |
-
-## 自审计
-
-`evals/checks.json` 列出了一组 MUST/SHOULD 检查项，供 LLM 或评审者确认思维 discipline 被遵循。在所有 MUST 项通过之前，不得宣布任务完成。
-
-## 贡献
-
-- `SKILL.md` 中的每条主张都必须追溯到某个参考文件
-- 每个引用链接必须能解析到存在的文件
-- 保持 skill 精简，与原著保持一致
-- 提交前运行 `./init.ps1`
-
-完整工作规则见 `AGENTS.md`。
-
-## 版本
-
-本 skill 遵循 [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/)（`X.Y.Z`）。
-
-| 版本 | 日期 | 说明 |
-|---|---|---|
-| 0.1.0 | 2026-07-24 | 首次公开发布 |
-
-完整变更记录见 [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md)。
-
-## 协议
-
-MIT License。详见 [LICENSE](LICENSE)。
-
----
-
-## Source
-
-Qian Xuesen (Tsien Hsue-shen‌; 钱学森) & Song Jian (宋健), *Engineering Cybernetics* (工程控制论). The original book and its mathematical foundations are the authoritative source; this skill is a faithful interpretation, not a replacement.
-
----
-
-<br/><br/>
-
----
-
-<a name="english"></a>
-
-<!-- Language toggle / 语言切换 -->
-
-> [中文](#简介) | **English**
-
----
-
-## About
-
-`systems-thinking` is a thinking-mode skill. It installs a control-theoretic cognitive operating system in the LLM—shaping how the model *thinks* about systems (state, observability, stability, bounds, coupling) before writing or changing code.
-
-> **One-line pitch: Control-theoretic thinking for code—know your state before you touch it.**
-
-This is not a vocabulary test for humans, and not a bug-hunting playbook. It is a scaffold that reframes every non-trivial change from *"write the smallest patch and hope"* to *identify the state, measure the trajectory, stabilize the plant, then steer*.
-
-Derived from Qian Xuesen (Tsien Hsue-shen‌) & Song Jian, *Engineering Cybernetics* (工程控制论). Language- and framework-agnostic. Self-contained.
-
-## What it solves
-
-The default approach to coding is: start typing, then pray the tests pass. This skill changes that order.
-
-It fits best when:
-
-- You're changing legacy code you don't fully understand
-- You're debugging something that breaks intermittently and can't be reproduced reliably
-- You're refactoring modules that are tangled together
-- A change needs to be both correct and robust
-
-In these situations, "write the smallest patch" is often not enough. You need to understand the system's state first.
-
-## Core idea
-
-One sentence: **a program is a dynamical system, and you are the controller.**
-
-Every change injects a control signal. You only partially observe the true state. Bugs are unstable or poorly-damped trajectories. Debugging is state estimation. Tests are sensors feeding a feedback loop. **Closed loop beats open loop.**
-
-## Installation
-
-This skill is designed for AI coding agents that support custom skills (Kilo, Claude Code, Aider, Cursor, etc.).
-
-### Direct copy
-
-```bash
-cp -r systems-thinking <agent-skills-dir>/
-```
-
-### Symlink (development)
-
-```bash
-ln -s /absolute/path/to/systems-thinking <agent-skills-dir>/
-```
-
-### Agent paths
-
-| Agent | Path |
-|---|---|
-| Kilo | `~/.config/kilo/skills/` or `.kilo/agent/` in project |
-| Claude Code | `~/.claude/plugins/custom-skills/` or `.claude/` in project |
-| Aider | `--skills-dir` flag |
-| Cursor | `.cursor/rules/` in project or global settings |
-
-### Verify
-
-```bash
-pwsh init.ps1
-```
-
-Look for `Verification Complete — OK`.
-
-## Usage
-
-### 1. When to load
-
-Load this skill when the task involves:
-
-- Architecture design
-- Debugging non-deterministic behavior
-- Cross-module refactoring
-- Any change where correctness AND robustness both matter
-
-### 2. Read SKILL.md
-
-Read `SKILL.md` first. The runtime prompt block installs the cognitive laws. The workflow below follows naturally.
-
-### 3. Name things before touching code
-
-Before proposing any change, the LLM must name four things:
-
-- `x` — the controlled variable (what must stay correct)
-- `u` — the control variable (the lever you will actually move)
-- Observability — how will you know the current value of `x`?
-- Bounds — every actuator saturates; no unbounded loop is acceptable
-
-### 4. Seven-step loop
-
-| Step | Principle | Reference |
-|---|---|---|
-| 1 | Identify — name `x`, `u`, observability, bounds. | `references/state-and-control.md` |
-| 2 | Analyze — reproduce, measure, locate fault, state the model. | `references/modeling.md` |
-| 3 | Stabilize — kill divergence / oscillation / leaks before features. | `references/stability.md` |
-| 4 | Synthesize — minimal `u`; decouple what hurts, coordinate what helps. | `references/multivariable.md` |
-| 5 | Close the loop — observe actual result; correct until bounded. | `references/closed-loop-workflow.md` |
-| 6 | Compensate — feedforward measurable disturbances; clamp the actuator. | `references/disturbance.md` |
-| 7 | Optimize — only then tune secondary indicators. | `references/bounded-control.md` |
-
-For sampled-system and test-cadence concerns, also see `references/discrete-systems.md`.
-
-### 5. Templates
-
-These files are located in the skill's `templates/` directory (relative to the skill
-installation root).
-
-- **Debugging**: copy `templates/debugging-checklist.md` into the session.
-- **Planning**: use `templates/change-proposal.md` to write a control plan.
-
-### 6. Self-audit
-
-Before declaring done, pass all MUST checks in `evals/checks.json`.
-
-## Cognitive laws
-
-The skill enforces 8 cognitive laws:
-
-1. Name `x` before `u`. Unnamed targets are unregulated.
-2. Observe before you guess. Measure current behavior before synthesizing the fix.
-3. Stabilize before you optimize. Divergence under perturbation is failure.
-4. Close the loop. Observe the actual result; correct until deviation is bounded.
-5. Feedforward measurable disturbances; feedback the rest. Never crank gain on delay.
-6. Decouple harmful coupling. Coordinate beneficial coupling. Regulate relations, not just absolutes.
-7. Minimal control. The smallest `u` that moves `x` to target. No speculative extras.
-8. Convergence: corrections must shrink. If they grow, you are unstable — stop and re-identify.
-
-## Worked example
-
-**Symptom:** an API endpoint intermittently returns 500 under load.
-
-| Step | Control-theoretic action |
-|---|---|
-| Identify | `x` = error rate; `u` = retry/timeout/cache logic; bound = request budget. |
-| Analyze | Reproduce under load; measure that error rate climbs with concurrency (unstable). |
-| Stabilize | Add circuit breaker + bounded retries with backoff → error rate bounded. |
-| Synthesize | Minimal change; don't rewrite the service. |
-| Close the loop | Load-test again; error rate now converges to ~0. |
-| Compensate | Feedforward on measurable dependency outage (fail fast) + feedback on the rest. |
-| Optimize | Only now trim p99 latency. |
-
-**Without this lens:** add retries with no bound → retry storm (an unstable delay loop) → worse than before.
-
-## References
-
-8 deep-dive references, each anchored to the original text with LLM behavior patterns:
-
-| Topic | File |
-|---|---|
-| Closed-loop workflow | `references/closed-loop-workflow.md` |
-| State, control, observability, bounds | `references/state-and-control.md` |
-| Stability | `references/stability.md` |
-| Modeling and model validity | `references/modeling.md` |
-| Multivariable: decouple and coordinate | `references/multivariable.md` |
-| Disturbance compensation and time-delay | `references/disturbance.md` |
-| Bounded control | `references/bounded-control.md` |
-| Discrete systems and test cadence | `references/discrete-systems.md` |
-
-## Self-audit
-
-`evals/checks.json` lists concrete MUST/SHOULD checks an LLM or reviewer applies to confirm the discipline was followed. All MUST items must pass before a task is called done.
-
-## Contributing
-
-- Every claim in `SKILL.md` must trace to a reference file.
-- Every reference link must resolve to an existing file.
-- Keep the skill small and aligned to the book.
-- Run `./init.ps1` before submitting.
-
-See `AGENTS.md` for the full working rules and definition of done.
-
-## Version
-
-This skill follows [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/) (`X.Y.Z`).
-
-| Version | Date | Notes |
-|---|---|---|
-| 0.1.0 | 2026-07-24 | Initial public release |
-
-Full history: [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md).
-
-## License
-
-MIT License. See [LICENSE](LICENSE) for details.
-
-## Source
-
-Derived from Qian Xuesen (钱学森) & Song Jian (宋健), *Engineering Cybernetics* (工程控制论). The original book and its mathematical foundations are the authoritative source; this skill is a faithful interpretation, not a replacement.
+# systems-thinking
+
+<!-- Language toggle / 语言切换 -->
+
+> **中文** | [English](#english)
+
+---
+
+## 简介
+
+`systems-thinking` 是一个思维模式 skill。它把控制论的思想装进 LLM 的思考过程里，让模型在写代码、改代码、做架构之前，先想清楚：状态是什么、怎么观测、稳不稳定、边界在哪、耦合怎么处理。
+
+> **一句话：用系统视角写代码——先识别状态，再动手，最后闭环验证。**
+
+这不是给人类做的知识测试，也不是一本排错手册。它是一个脚手架，改变的是模型**怎么想**，而不是怎么拼 diff。
+
+源自钱学森、宋健《工程控制论》。语言和框架无关，拿来就能用。
+
+## 它解决什么问题
+
+写代码时常见的做法是：先动手，再祈祷测试能过。这个 skill 要改变的是这个顺序。
+
+它特别适合这些场景：
+
+- 改一段你不完全理解的遗留代码
+- 调试一个时好时坏、复现不了的问题
+- 重构几个互相牵制的模块
+- 做任何"既要正确又要稳"的改动
+
+在这些场景里，"写个最小补丁"往往不够。你需要先搞清楚系统的状态，再动手。
+
+## 核心思想
+
+一句话：**程序是一个动态系统，你是控制器。**
+
+每次改动都在往系统里注入一个控制信号。你只能部分观测系统的真实状态。bug 是不稳定或欠阻尼的轨迹。调试就是状态估计。测试是反馈回路的传感器。**闭环永远比开环好。**
+
+## 安装
+
+本 skill 面向支持自定义 skill 的 AI 编程助手（Kilo、Claude Code、Aider、Cursor 等）。
+
+### npx 一键安装（推荐）
+
+```bash
+npx skill-systems-thinking install
+```
+
+该命令会自动检测你机器上已安装的 AI agent，并将 skill 链接到对应的 skill 目录。
+
+- 全局安装（所有项目可用）：`npx skill-systems-thinking install --global`
+- 强制覆盖已存在的链接：`npx skill-systems-thinking install --force`
+
+### GitHub 下载
+
+```bash
+git clone https://github.com/ShrimpLeon/systems-thinking.git
+cp -r systems-thinking <agent-skills-dir>/
+```
+
+### 符号链接（开发用）
+
+```bash
+ln -s /absolute/path/to/systems-thinking <agent-skills-dir>/
+```
+
+### 各 agent 配置
+
+npx 安装会自动将 skill 链接到各 agent 的 skill 目录。手动安装时，各 agent 的 skill 目录如下。
+
+| Agent | Skill 目录 |
+|---|---|
+| Kilo | `~/.config/kilo/skills/` 或项目 `.kilo/agent/` |
+| Claude Code | `~/.claude/plugins/custom-skills/` 或项目 `.claude/` |
+| Aider | `--skills-dir` 路径 |
+| Cursor | 项目 `.cursor/rules/` 或全局设置 |
+| OpenAI Codex | `~/.codex/skills/` |
+| GitHub Copilot | `~/.copilot/skills/` |
+| Windsurf | `~/.windsurf/skills/` |
+| Zed | `~/.zed/skills/` |
+
+> **注意：** 如果你的 agent 未出现在上方，请查阅其文档获取自定义 skill/plugin 路径。
+
+### 验证安装
+
+```bash
+pwsh init.ps1
+```
+
+看到 `Verification Complete — OK` 就说明装好了。
+
+## 兼容性
+
+npm 包 `skill-systems-thinking` 兼容以下 agent 智能体：
+
+| Agent | npm 安装兼容 | 说明 |
+|---|---|---|
+| Kilo | ✅ | 通过 `~/.config/kilo/skills/` 或 `.kilo/agent/` 链接 |
+| Claude Code | ✅ | 通过 `~/.claude/plugins/custom-skills/` 或 `.claude/` 链接 |
+| Aider | ✅ | 通过 `--skills-dir` 参数指定链接目录 |
+| Cursor | ✅ | 通过 `.cursor/rules/` 或全局设置链接 |
+| OpenAI Codex | ✅ | 通过 `~/.codex/skills/` 链接 |
+| GitHub Copilot | ✅ | 通过 `~/.copilot/skills/` 链接 |
+| Windsurf | ✅ | 通过 `~/.windsurf/skills/` 链接 |
+| Zed | ✅ | 通过 `~/.zed/skills/` 链接 |
+
+npx 安装会自动将 skill 链接到各 agent 的 skill 目录。由于 npm 包不包含 agent 特有的配置文件（如 `.kilo/`、`.claude/` 等），安装脚本会从各 agent 的 skill 目录创建符号链接到包位置。这一步在所有支持的 agent 上都是相同的操作。
+
+## 使用方式
+
+### 1. 触发时机
+
+在涉及以下任务时加载本 skill：
+
+- 架构设计
+- 调试非确定性行为
+- 跨模块重构
+- 任何"正确且稳健必须同时满足"的改动
+
+### 2. 读 SKILL.md
+
+先读 `SKILL.md`，里面的运行时提示块会安装认知法则。下面的工作流是自然延伸。
+
+### 3. 动手之前，先命名
+
+改代码之前，必须说清楚四个东西：
+
+- `x` — 被控变量，什么必须保持正确
+- `u` — 控制变量，你实际会动的那个杠杆
+- 可观测性 — 你怎么知道 `x` 的当前值
+- 边界 — 每个执行器都会饱和，不接受无界循环
+
+### 4. 七步循环
+
+| 步骤 | 原则 | 参考文件 |
+|---|---|---|
+| 1 | 识别：命名 `x`、`u`、可观测性、边界 | `references/state-and-control.md` |
+| 2 | 分析：复现、测量、定位故障、建立模型 | `references/modeling.md` |
+| 3 | 稳定：在加新功能之前先消灭发散/振荡/泄露 | `references/stability.md` |
+| 4 | 综合：最小 `u`；解耦有害，协调有益 | `references/multivariable.md` |
+| 5 | 闭环：观察实际结果，修正直到偏差有界 | `references/closed-loop-workflow.md` |
+| 6 | 补偿：可测扰动用前馈；有延迟就加阻尼 | `references/disturbance.md` |
+| 7 | 优化：稳定之后才谈性能调优 | `references/bounded-control.md` |
+
+涉及采样和测试节奏的问题，额外参考 `references/discrete-systems.md`。
+
+### 5. 模板
+
+以下文件位于 skill 安装目录下的 `templates/` 子目录中：
+
+- **调试时**：把 `templates/debugging-checklist.md` 复制进会话
+- **规划改动时**：用 `templates/change-proposal.md` 写控制计划
+
+### 6. 自审计
+
+宣布完成之前，必须通过 `evals/checks.json` 中所有的 MUST 检查项。
+
+## 认知法则
+
+这个 skill 强制执行 8 条认知法则：
+
+1. 先命名 `x` 再命名 `u`。没名字的目标就没法调节。
+2. 先观测再猜测。综合方案之前先测量当前行为。
+3. 稳定优先于优化。扰动下发散就是失败。
+4. 闭环。观察实际结果，不断修正直到偏差有界。
+5. 可测扰动用前馈，其余用反馈。绝不在延迟回路上提高增益。
+6. 解耦有害耦合，协调有益耦合。调节关系，不只是绝对值。
+7. 最小控制。移动 `x` 到目标所需的最小 `u`，不搞投机性额外操作。
+8. 收敛。修正幅度必须越来越小。如果越来越大，说明不稳定——停下来重新识别。
+
+## 工作示例
+
+**问题**：一个 API 接口在负载下间歇性返回 500。
+
+| 步骤 | 控制论行动 |
+|---|---|
+| 识别 | `x` = 错误率；`u` = 重试/超时/缓存逻辑；边界 = 请求预算。 |
+| 分析 | 在负载下复现；测量错误率随并发上升（不稳定）。 |
+| 稳定 | 加熔断器 + 带退避的有界重试 → 错误率有界。 |
+| 综合 | 最小改动，不要重写服务。 |
+| 闭环 | 再次压测；错误率收敛到接近 0。 |
+| 补偿 | 对可测依赖故障快速失败（前馈）+ 其余用反馈。 |
+| 优化 | 此时才 trim p99 延迟。 |
+
+**没有这套视角的常见失败**：无限制加重试 → 重试风暴（不稳定延迟环）→ 比原来更糟。
+
+## 参考文件
+
+8 篇深度参考，每篇对应一个控制论原则，附带 LLM 行为模式说明：
+
+| 主题 | 文件 |
+|---|---|
+| 闭环工作流 | `references/closed-loop-workflow.md` |
+| 状态、控制、可观测性、边界 | `references/state-and-control.md` |
+| 稳定性 | `references/stability.md` |
+| 建模与模型有效性 | `references/modeling.md` |
+| 多变量：解耦与协调 | `references/multivariable.md` |
+| 扰动补偿与时延 | `references/disturbance.md` |
+| 有界控制 | `references/bounded-control.md` |
+| 离散系统与测试节奏 | `references/discrete-systems.md` |
+
+## 自审计
+
+`evals/checks.json` 列出了一组 MUST/SHOULD 检查项，供 LLM 或评审者确认思维 discipline 被遵循。在所有 MUST 项通过之前，不得宣布任务完成。
+
+## 贡献
+
+- `SKILL.md` 中的每条主张都必须追溯到某个参考文件
+- 每个引用链接必须能解析到存在的文件
+- 保持 skill 精简，与原著保持一致
+- 提交前运行 `./init.ps1`
+
+完整工作规则见 `AGENTS.md`。
+
+## 版本
+
+本 skill 遵循 [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/)（`X.Y.Z`）。
+
+| 版本 | 日期 | 说明 |
+|---|---|---|
+| 0.1.0 | 2026-07-24 | 首次公开发布 |
+
+完整变更记录见 [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md)。
+
+## 协议
+
+MIT License。详见 [LICENSE](LICENSE)。
+
+---
+
+## Source
+
+Qian Xuesen (Tsien Hsue-shen‌; 钱学森) & Song Jian (宋健), *Engineering Cybernetics* (工程控制论). The original book and its mathematical foundations are the authoritative source; this skill is a faithful interpretation, not a replacement.
+
+---
+
+<br/><br/>
+
+---
+
+<a name="english"></a>
+
+<!-- Language toggle / 语言切换 -->
+
+> [中文](#简介) | **English**
+
+---
+
+## About
+
+`systems-thinking` is a thinking-mode skill. It installs a control-theoretic cognitive operating system in the LLM—shaping how the model *thinks* about systems (state, observability, stability, bounds, coupling) before writing or changing code.
+
+> **One-line pitch: Control-theoretic thinking for code—know your state before you touch it.**
+
+This is not a vocabulary test for humans, and not a bug-hunting playbook. It is a scaffold that reframes every non-trivial change from *"write the smallest patch and hope"* to *identify the state, measure the trajectory, stabilize the plant, then steer*.
+
+Derived from Qian Xuesen (Tsien Hsue-shen‌) & Song Jian, *Engineering Cybernetics* (工程控制论). Language- and framework-agnostic. Self-contained.
+
+## What it solves
+
+The default approach to coding is: start typing, then pray the tests pass. This skill changes that order.
+
+It fits best when:
+
+- You're changing legacy code you don't fully understand
+- You're debugging something that breaks intermittently and can't be reproduced reliably
+- You're refactoring modules that are tangled together
+- A change needs to be both correct and robust
+
+In these situations, "write the smallest patch" is often not enough. You need to understand the system's state first.
+
+## Core idea
+
+One sentence: **a program is a dynamical system, and you are the controller.**
+
+Every change injects a control signal. You only partially observe the true state. Bugs are unstable or poorly-damped trajectories. Debugging is state estimation. Tests are sensors feeding a feedback loop. **Closed loop beats open loop.**
+
+## Installation
+
+This skill is designed for AI coding agents that support custom skills (Kilo, Claude Code, Aider, Cursor, etc.).
+
+### npx one-command install (recommended)
+
+```bash
+npx skill-systems-thinking install
+```
+
+This command automatically detects AI agents installed on your machine and links the skill into their skill directories.
+
+- Global install (available across all projects): `npx skill-systems-thinking install --global`
+- Force overwrite existing links: `npx skill-systems-thinking install --force`
+
+### GitHub download
+
+```bash
+git clone https://github.com/ShrimpLeon/systems-thinking.git
+cp -r systems-thinking <agent-skills-dir>/
+```
+
+### Symlink (development)
+
+```bash
+ln -s /absolute/path/to/systems-thinking <agent-skills-dir>/
+```
+
+### Agent-specific setup
+
+npx install automatically links the skill into each agent's skill directory. For manual installation, below are the paths for each supported agent.
+
+| Agent | Skill directory |
+|---|---|
+| Kilo | `~/.config/kilo/skills/` or project `.kilo/agent/` |
+| Claude Code | `~/.claude/plugins/custom-skills/` or project `.claude/` |
+| Aider | `--skills-dir` path |
+| Cursor | Project `.cursor/rules/` or global settings |
+| OpenAI Codex | `~/.codex/skills/` |
+| GitHub Copilot | `~/.copilot/skills/` |
+| Windsurf | `~/.windsurf/skills/` |
+| Zed | `~/.zed/skills/` |
+
+> **Note:** If your agent does not appear above, check its documentation for custom skill/plugin paths.
+
+### Verify installation
+
+```bash
+pwsh init.ps1
+```
+
+Look for `Verification Complete — OK`.
+
+## Compatibility
+
+The npm package `skill-systems-thinking` is compatible with the following AI agents:
+
+| Agent | npm install compatible | Notes |
+|---|---|---|
+| Kilo | ✅ | Link via `~/.config/kilo/skills/` or `.kilo/agent/` |
+| Claude Code | ✅ | Link via `~/.claude/plugins/custom-skills/` or `.claude/` |
+| Aider | ✅ | Link via `--skills-dir` flag |
+| Cursor | ✅ | Link via `.cursor/rules/` or global settings |
+| OpenAI Codex | ✅ | Link via `~/.codex/skills/` |
+| GitHub Copilot | ✅ | Link via `~/.copilot/skills/` |
+| Windsurf | ✅ | Link via `~/.windsurf/skills/` |
+| Zed | ✅ | Link via `~/.zed/skills/` |
+
+The npx install automatically links the skill into each agent's skill directory. Since the package does not include agent-specific config files (like `.kilo/`, `.claude/`, etc.), the install script creates symlinks from each agent's skill directory to the package location. This is the same operation across all supported agents.
+
+## Usage
+
+### 1. When to load
+
+Load this skill when the task involves:
+
+- Architecture design
+- Debugging non-deterministic behavior
+- Cross-module refactoring
+- Any change where correctness AND robustness both matter
+
+### 2. Read SKILL.md
+
+Read `SKILL.md` first. The runtime prompt block installs the cognitive laws. The workflow below follows naturally.
+
+### 3. Name things before touching code
+
+Before proposing any change, the LLM must name four things:
+
+- `x` — the controlled variable (what must stay correct)
+- `u` — the control variable (the lever you will actually move)
+- Observability — how will you know the current value of `x`?
+- Bounds — every actuator saturates; no unbounded loop is acceptable
+
+### 4. Seven-step loop
+
+| Step | Principle | Reference |
+|---|---|---|
+| 1 | Identify — name `x`, `u`, observability, bounds. | `references/state-and-control.md` |
+| 2 | Analyze — reproduce, measure, locate fault, state the model. | `references/modeling.md` |
+| 3 | Stabilize — kill divergence / oscillation / leaks before features. | `references/stability.md` |
+| 4 | Synthesize — minimal `u`; decouple what hurts, coordinate what helps. | `references/multivariable.md` |
+| 5 | Close the loop — observe actual result; correct until bounded. | `references/closed-loop-workflow.md` |
+| 6 | Compensate — feedforward measurable disturbances; clamp the actuator. | `references/disturbance.md` |
+| 7 | Optimize — only then tune secondary indicators. | `references/bounded-control.md` |
+
+For sampled-system and test-cadence concerns, also see `references/discrete-systems.md`.
+
+### 5. Templates
+
+These files are located in the skill's `templates/` directory (relative to the skill
+installation root).
+
+- **Debugging**: copy `templates/debugging-checklist.md` into the session.
+- **Planning**: use `templates/change-proposal.md` to write a control plan.
+
+### 6. Self-audit
+
+Before declaring done, pass all MUST checks in `evals/checks.json`.
+
+## Cognitive laws
+
+The skill enforces 8 cognitive laws:
+
+1. Name `x` before `u`. Unnamed targets are unregulated.
+2. Observe before you guess. Measure current behavior before synthesizing the fix.
+3. Stabilize before you optimize. Divergence under perturbation is failure.
+4. Close the loop. Observe the actual result; correct until deviation is bounded.
+5. Feedforward measurable disturbances; feedback the rest. Never crank gain on delay.
+6. Decouple harmful coupling. Coordinate beneficial coupling. Regulate relations, not just absolutes.
+7. Minimal control. The smallest `u` that moves `x` to target. No speculative extras.
+8. Convergence: corrections must shrink. If they grow, you are unstable — stop and re-identify.
+
+## Worked example
+
+**Symptom:** an API endpoint intermittently returns 500 under load.
+
+| Step | Control-theoretic action |
+|---|---|
+| Identify | `x` = error rate; `u` = retry/timeout/cache logic; bound = request budget. |
+| Analyze | Reproduce under load; measure that error rate climbs with concurrency (unstable). |
+| Stabilize | Add circuit breaker + bounded retries with backoff → error rate bounded. |
+| Synthesize | Minimal change; don't rewrite the service. |
+| Close the loop | Load-test again; error rate now converges to ~0. |
+| Compensate | Feedforward on measurable dependency outage (fail fast) + feedback on the rest. |
+| Optimize | Only now trim p99 latency. |
+
+**Without this lens:** add retries with no bound → retry storm (an unstable delay loop) → worse than before.
+
+## References
+
+8 deep-dive references, each anchored to the original text with LLM behavior patterns:
+
+| Topic | File |
+|---|---|
+| Closed-loop workflow | `references/closed-loop-workflow.md` |
+| State, control, observability, bounds | `references/state-and-control.md` |
+| Stability | `references/stability.md` |
+| Modeling and model validity | `references/modeling.md` |
+| Multivariable: decouple and coordinate | `references/multivariable.md` |
+| Disturbance compensation and time-delay | `references/disturbance.md` |
+| Bounded control | `references/bounded-control.md` |
+| Discrete systems and test cadence | `references/discrete-systems.md` |
+
+## Self-audit
+
+`evals/checks.json` lists concrete MUST/SHOULD checks an LLM or reviewer applies to confirm the discipline was followed. All MUST items must pass before a task is called done.
+
+## Contributing
+
+- Every claim in `SKILL.md` must trace to a reference file.
+- Every reference link must resolve to an existing file.
+- Keep the skill small and aligned to the book.
+- Run `./init.ps1` before submitting.
+
+See `AGENTS.md` for the full working rules and definition of done.
+
+## Version
+
+This skill follows [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/) (`X.Y.Z`).
+
+| Version | Date | Notes |
+|---|---|---|
+| 0.1.0 | 2026-07-24 | Initial public release |
+
+Full history: [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md).
+
+## License
+
+MIT License. See [LICENSE](LICENSE) for details.
+
+## Source
+
+Derived from Qian Xuesen (钱学森) & Song Jian (宋健), *Engineering Cybernetics* (工程控制论). The original book and its mathematical foundations are the authoritative source; this skill is a faithful interpretation, not a replacement.