siesa-agents 2.1.39 → 2.1.41

package/bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-01-init.md

@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+# Step 1: Architecture Workflow Initialization
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
+- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between architectural peers
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+- 💬 FOCUS on initialization and setup only - don't look ahead to future steps
+- 🚪 DETECT existing workflow state and handle continuation properly
+- ⚠️ ABSOLUTELY NO TIME ESTIMATES - AI development speed has fundamentally changed
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
+- 💾 Initialize document and update frontmatter
+- 📖 Set up frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1]` before loading next step
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until setup is complete
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Variables from workflow.md are available in memory
+- Previous context = what's in output document + frontmatter
+- Don't assume knowledge from other steps
+- Input document discovery happens in this step
+
+## YOUR TASK:
+
+Initialize the Architecture workflow by detecting continuation state, discovering input documents, and setting up the document for collaborative architectural decision making.
+
+## INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE:
+
+### 1. Check for Existing Workflow
+
+First, check if the output document already exists:
+
+- Look for existing {planning_artifacts}/`*architecture*.md`
+- If exists, read the complete file(s) including frontmatter
+- If not exists, this is a fresh workflow
+
+### 2. Handle Continuation (If Document Exists)
+
+If the document exists and has frontmatter with `stepsCompleted`:
+
+- **STOP here** and load `./step-01b-continue.md` immediately
+- Do not proceed with any initialization tasks
+- Let step-01b handle the continuation logic
+
+### 3. Fresh Workflow Setup (If No Document)
+
+If no document exists or no `stepsCompleted` in frontmatter:
+
+#### A. Input Document Discovery
+
+Discover and load context documents using smart discovery. Documents can be in the following locations:
+- {planning_artifacts}/**
+- {output_folder}/**
+- {product_knowledge}/**
+- docs/**
+
+Also - when searching - documents can be a single markdown file, or a folder with an index and multiple files. For Example, if searching for `*foo*.md` and not found, also search for a folder called *foo*/index.md (which indicates sharded content)
+
+Try to discover the following:
+- Product Brief (`*brief*.md`)
+- Product Requirements Document (`*prd*.md`)
+- UX Design (`*ux-design*.md`) and other
+- Research Documents (`*research*.md`)
+- Project Documentation (generally multiple documents might be found for this in the `{product_knowledge}` or `docs` folder.)
+- Project Context (`**/project-context.md`)
+
+<critical>Confirm what you have found with the user, along with asking if the user wants to provide anything else. Only after this confirmation will you proceed to follow the loading rules</critical>
+
+**Loading Rules:**
+
+- Load ALL discovered files completely that the user confirmed or provided (no offset/limit)
+- If there is a project context, whatever is relevant should try to be biased in the remainder of this whole workflow process
+- For sharded folders, load ALL files to get complete picture, using the index first to potentially know the potential of each document
+- index.md is a guide to what's relevant whenever available
+- Track all successfully loaded files in frontmatter `inputDocuments` array
+
+#### A2. Load Company Standards (If Exist)
+
+Check for company standards at `{company_standards_path}`:
+
+- If directory exists, load ALL .md files from it
+- Set `workflowMode` = "strict" if standards found, else "discovery"
+- Report: "✅ Estándares corporativos cargados. Modo: ESTRICTO"
+
+#### B. Validate Required Inputs
+
+Before proceeding, verify we have the essential inputs:
+
+**PRD Validation:**
+
+- If no PRD found: "Architecture requires a PRD to work from. Please run the PRD workflow first or provide the PRD file path."
+- Do NOT proceed without PRD
+
+**Other Input that might exist:**
+
+- UX Spec: "Provides UI/UX architectural requirements"
+
+**UI Kit Validation (if frontend project):**
+
+- Check `{project-root}/package.json` for "siesa-ui-kit"
+- If NOT found: "⚠️ siesa-ui-kit no instalado. Ejecuta: npm i siesa-ui-kit"
+
+#### C. Create Initial Document
+
+Copy the template from `{installed_path}/architecture-decision-template.md` to `{planning_artifacts}/architecture.md`
+
+#### D. Complete Initialization and Report
+
+Complete setup and report to user:
+
+**Document Setup:**
+
+- Created: `{planning_artifacts}/architecture.md` from template
+- Initialized frontmatter with workflow state
+
+**Input Documents Discovered:**
+Report what was found:
+"Welcome {{user_name}}! I've set up your Architecture workspace for {{project_name}}.
+
+**Documents Found:**
+
+- PRD: {number of PRD files loaded or "None found - REQUIRED"}
+- UX Design: {number of UX files loaded or "None found"}
+- Research: {number of research files loaded or "None found"}
+- Project docs: {number of project files loaded or "None found"}
+- Project context: {project_context_rules count of rules for AI agents found}
+
+**Files loaded:** {list of specific file names or "No additional documents found"}
+
+Ready to begin architectural decision making. Do you have any other documents you'd like me to include?
+
+[C] Continue to project context analysis
+
+## SUCCESS METRICS:
+
+✅ Existing workflow detected and handed off to step-01b correctly
+✅ Fresh workflow initialized with template and frontmatter
+✅ Input documents discovered and loaded using sharded-first logic
+✅ All discovered files tracked in frontmatter `inputDocuments`
+✅ PRD requirement validated and communicated
+✅ User confirmed document setup and can proceed
+
+## FAILURE MODES:
+
+❌ Proceeding with fresh initialization when existing workflow exists
+❌ Not updating frontmatter with discovered input documents
+❌ Creating document without proper template
+❌ Not checking sharded folders first before whole files
+❌ Not reporting what documents were found to user
+❌ Proceeding without validating PRD requirement
+
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
+
+## NEXT STEP:
+
+After user selects [C] to continue, only after ensuring all the template output has been created, then load `./step-02-context.md` to analyze the project context and begin architectural decision making.
+
+Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-02 until user explicitly selects [C] from the menu and setup is confirmed!

package/bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-01b-continue.md

@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+# Step 1b: Workflow Continuation Handler
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+
+- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
+- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between architectural peers
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+- 💬 FOCUS on understanding current state and getting user confirmation
+- 🚪 HANDLE workflow resumption smoothly and transparently
+- ⚠️ ABSOLUTELY NO TIME ESTIMATES - AI development speed has fundamentally changed
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
+- 📖 Read existing document completely to understand current state
+- 💾 Update frontmatter to reflect continuation
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed to next step without user confirmation
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Existing document and frontmatter are available
+- Input documents already loaded should be in frontmatter `inputDocuments`
+- Steps already completed are in `stepsCompleted` array
+- Focus on understanding where we left off
+
+## YOUR TASK:
+
+Handle workflow continuation by analyzing existing work and guiding the user to resume at the appropriate step.
+
+## CONTINUATION SEQUENCE:
+
+### 1. Analyze Current Document State
+
+Read the existing architecture document completely and analyze:
+
+**Frontmatter Analysis:**
+
+- `stepsCompleted`: What steps have been done
+- `inputDocuments`: What documents were loaded
+- `lastStep`: Last step that was executed
+- `project_name`, `user_name`, `date`: Basic context
+
+**Content Analysis:**
+
+- What sections exist in the document
+- What architectural decisions have been made
+- What appears incomplete or in progress
+- Any TODOs or placeholders remaining
+
+### 2. Present Continuation Summary
+
+Show the user their current progress:
+
+"Welcome back {{user_name}}! I found your Architecture work for {{project_name}}.
+
+**Current Progress:**
+
+- Steps completed: {{stepsCompleted list}}
+- Last step worked on: Step {{lastStep}}
+- Input documents loaded: {{number of inputDocuments}} files
+
+**Document Sections Found:**
+{list all H2/H3 sections found in the document}
+
+{if_incomplete_sections}
+**Incomplete Areas:**
+
+- {areas that appear incomplete or have placeholders}
+  {/if_incomplete_sections}
+
+**What would you like to do?**
+[R] Resume from where we left off
+[C] Continue to next logical step
+[O] Overview of all remaining steps
+[X] Start over (will overwrite existing work)
+"
+
+### 3. Handle User Choice
+
+#### If 'R' (Resume from where we left off):
+
+- Identify the next step based on `stepsCompleted`
+- Load the appropriate step file to continue
+- Example: If `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]`, load `step-04-decisions.md`
+
+#### If 'C' (Continue to next logical step):
+
+- Analyze the document content to determine logical next step
+- May need to review content quality and completeness
+- If content seems complete for current step, advance to next
+- If content seems incomplete, suggest staying on current step
+
+#### If 'O' (Overview of all remaining steps):
+
+- Provide brief description of all remaining steps
+- Let user choose which step to work on
+- Don't assume sequential progression is always best
+
+#### If 'X' (Start over):
+
+- Confirm: "This will delete all existing architectural decisions. Are you sure? (y/n)"
+- If confirmed: Delete existing document and return to step-01-init.md
+- If not confirmed: Return to continuation menu
+
+### 4. Navigate to Selected Step
+
+After user makes choice:
+
+**Load the selected step file:**
+
+- Update frontmatter `lastStep` to reflect current navigation
+- Execute the selected step file
+- Let that step handle the detailed continuation logic
+
+**State Preservation:**
+
+- Maintain all existing content in the document
+- Keep `stepsCompleted` accurate
+- Track the resumption in workflow status
+
+### 5. Special Continuation Cases
+
+#### If `stepsCompleted` is empty but document has content:
+
+- This suggests an interrupted workflow
+- Ask user: "I see the document has content but no steps are marked as complete. Should I analyze what's here and set the appropriate step status?"
+
+#### If document appears corrupted or incomplete:
+
+- Ask user: "The document seems incomplete. Would you like me to try to recover what's here, or would you prefer to start fresh?"
+
+#### If document is complete but workflow not marked as done:
+
+- Ask user: "The architecture looks complete! Should I mark this workflow as finished, or is there more you'd like to work on?"
+
+## SUCCESS METRICS:
+
+✅ Existing document state properly analyzed and understood
+✅ User presented with clear continuation options
+✅ User choice handled appropriately and transparently
+✅ Workflow state preserved and updated correctly
+✅ Navigation to appropriate step handled smoothly
+
+## FAILURE MODES:
+
+❌ Not reading the complete existing document before making suggestions
+❌ Losing track of what steps were actually completed
+❌ Automatically proceeding without user confirmation of next steps
+❌ Not checking for incomplete or placeholder content
+❌ Losing existing document content during resumption
+
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
+
+## NEXT STEP:
+
+After user selects their continuation option, load the appropriate step file based on their choice. The step file will handle the detailed work from that point forward.
+
+Remember: The goal is smooth, transparent resumption that respects the work already done while giving the user control over how to proceed.

package/bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-02-context.md

@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
+# Step 2: Project Context Analysis
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+
+- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
+- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between architectural peers
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+- 💬 FOCUS on understanding project scope and requirements for architecture
+- 🎯 ANALYZE loaded documents, don't assume or generate requirements
+- ⚠️ ABSOLUTELY NO TIME ESTIMATES - AI development speed has fundamentally changed
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
+- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating project context analysis
+- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
+- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]` before loading next step
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
+
+## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
+
+This step will generate content and present choices:
+
+- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper insights about project context and architectural implications
+- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to analyze project requirements from different architectural angles
+- **C (Continue)**: Save the content to the document and proceed to next step
+
+## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
+
+- When 'A' selected: Execute {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml
+- When 'P' selected: Execute {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md
+- PROTOCOLS always return to display this step's A/P/C menu after the A or P have completed
+- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Current document and frontmatter from step 1 are available
+- Input documents already loaded are in memory (PRD, epics, UX spec, etc.)
+- Focus on architectural implications of requirements
+- No technology decisions yet - pure analysis phase
+
+## YOUR TASK:
+
+Fully read and Analyze the loaded project documents to understand architectural scope, requirements, and constraints before beginning decision making.
+
+## CONTEXT ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
+
+### 1. Review Project Requirements
+
+**From PRD Analysis:**
+
+- Extract and analyze Functional Requirements (FRs)
+- Identify Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs) like performance, security, compliance
+- Note any technical constraints or dependencies mentioned
+- Count and categorize requirements to understand project scale
+
+**From Epics/Stories (if available):**
+
+- Map epic structure and user stories to architectural components
+- Extract acceptance criteria for technical implications
+- Identify cross-cutting concerns that span multiple epics
+- Estimate story complexity for architectural planning
+
+**From UX Design (if available):**
+
+- Extract architectural implications from UX requirements:
+  - Component complexity (simple forms vs rich interactions)
+  - Animation/transition requirements
+  - Real-time update needs (live data, collaborative features)
+  - Platform-specific UI requirements
+  - Accessibility standards (WCAG compliance level)
+  - Responsive design breakpoints
+  - Offline capability requirements
+  - Performance expectations (load times, interaction responsiveness)
+
+### 2. Project Scale Assessment
+
+Calculate and present project complexity:
+
+**Complexity Indicators:**
+
+- Real-time features requirements
+- Multi-tenancy needs
+- Regulatory compliance requirements
+- Integration complexity
+- User interaction complexity
+- Data complexity and volume
+
+### 3. Reflect Understanding
+
+Present your analysis back to user for validation:
+
+"I'm reviewing your project documentation for {{project_name}}.
+
+{if_epics_loaded}I see {{epic_count}} epics with {{story_count}} total stories.{/if_epics_loaded}
+{if_no_epics}I found {{fr_count}} functional requirements organized into {{fr_category_list}}.{/if_no_epics}
+{if_ux_loaded}I also found your UX specification which defines the user experience requirements.{/if_ux_loaded}
+
+**Key architectural aspects I notice:**
+
+- [Summarize core functionality from FRs]
+- [Note critical NFRs that will shape architecture]
+- {if_ux_loaded}[Note UX complexity and technical requirements]{/if_ux_loaded}
+- [Identify unique technical challenges or constraints]
+- [Highlight any regulatory or compliance requirements]
+
+**Scale indicators:**
+
+- Project complexity appears to be: [low/medium/high/enterprise]
+- Primary technical domain: [web/mobile/api/backend/full-stack/etc]
+- Cross-cutting concerns identified: [list major ones]
+
+This analysis will help me guide you through the architectural decisions needed to ensure AI agents implement this consistently.
+
+Does this match your understanding of the project scope and requirements?"
+
+### 4. Generate Project Context Content
+
+Prepare the content to append to the document:
+
+#### Content Structure:
+
+```markdown
+## Project Context Analysis
+
+### Requirements Overview
+
+**Functional Requirements:**
+{{analysis of FRs and what they mean architecturally}}
+
+**Non-Functional Requirements:**
+{{NFRs that will drive architectural decisions}}
+
+**Scale & Complexity:**
+{{project_scale_assessment}}
+
+- Primary domain: {{technical_domain}}
+- Complexity level: {{complexity_level}}
+- Estimated architectural components: {{component_count}}
+
+### Technical Constraints & Dependencies
+
+{{known_constraints_dependencies}}
+
+### Cross-Cutting Concerns Identified
+
+{{concerns_that_will_affect_multiple_components}}
+```
+
+### 5. Present Content and Menu
+
+Show the generated content and present choices:
+
+"I've drafted the Project Context Analysis based on your requirements. This sets the foundation for our architectural decisions.
+
+**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
+
+[Show the complete markdown content from step 4]
+
+**What would you like to do?**
+[A] Advanced Elicitation - Let's dive deeper into architectural implications
+[P] Party Mode - Bring different perspectives to analyze requirements
+[C] Continue - Save this analysis and begin architectural decisions"
+
+### 6. Handle Menu Selection
+
+#### If 'A' (Advanced Elicitation):
+
+- Execute {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml with the current context analysis
+- Process the enhanced architectural insights that come back
+- Ask user: "Accept these enhancements to the project context analysis? (y/n)"
+- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
+- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
+
+#### If 'P' (Party Mode):
+
+- Execute {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md with the current project context
+- Process the collaborative improvements to architectural understanding
+- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the project context analysis? (y/n)"
+- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
+- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
+
+#### If 'C' (Continue):
+
+- Append the final content to `{planning_artifacts}/architecture.md`
+- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]`
+- Load `./step-03-starter.md`
+
+## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
+
+When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 4.
+
+## SUCCESS METRICS:
+
+✅ All input documents thoroughly analyzed for architectural implications
+✅ Project scope and complexity clearly assessed and validated
+✅ Technical constraints and dependencies identified
+✅ Cross-cutting concerns mapped for architectural planning
+✅ User confirmation of project understanding
+✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
+✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
+
+## FAILURE MODES:
+
+❌ Skimming documents without deep architectural analysis
+❌ Missing or misinterpreting critical NFRs
+❌ Not validating project understanding with user
+❌ Underestimating complexity indicators
+❌ Generating content without real analysis of loaded documents
+❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
+
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
+
+## NEXT STEP:
+
+After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-03-starter.md` to evaluate starter template options.
+
+Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-03 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!