proagents 1.6.17 → 1.6.18

package/.proagents/metrics/learning-effectiveness.md

@@ -1,478 +0,0 @@
-# Learning Effectiveness Metrics
-
-Track workflow adoption, improvement rates, and optimization effectiveness.
-
----
-
-## Prompt Template
-
-```
-Analyze learning system effectiveness for this project:
-
-Project: {project_name}
-Period: {date_range}
-Usage Data: {learning_data}
-
-Evaluate:
-1. Workflow adoption rate
-2. Pattern learning accuracy
-3. Suggestion acceptance rate
-4. Time savings achieved
-5. Error reduction rate
-
-Compare:
-- Initial baseline: {baseline}
-- Current performance: {current}
-- Target improvements: {targets}
-
-Provide:
-- Learning system effectiveness score
-- Key improvements made
-- Areas still learning
-- Recommendations for optimization
-```
-
----
-
-## Key Metrics
-
-### Workflow Adoption
-
-Track how effectively the team adopts ProAgents workflows.
-
-```yaml
-adoption:
-  metrics:
-    active_users: "Users using workflow regularly"
-    feature_utilization: "Features being used"
-    workflow_completion: "Workflows completed vs started"
-    checkpoint_usage: "Custom checkpoint configurations"
-
-  targets:
-    active_user_rate: "> 80%"
-    feature_utilization: "> 60%"
-    workflow_completion: "> 90%"
-```
-
-**Tracking:**
-```typescript
-interface AdoptionMetrics {
-  activeUsers: {
-    total: number;
-    percentage: number;
-    trend: 'growing' | 'stable' | 'declining';
-  };
-  featureUtilization: Map<string, {
-    users: number;
-    frequency: number;
-    satisfaction: number;
-  }>;
-  workflowCompletion: {
-    started: number;
-    completed: number;
-    abandoned: number;
-    rate: number;
-  };
-}
-```
-
-**Dashboard:**
-```
-Workflow Adoption - Last 30 Days
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-Active Users: 12/15 (80%) ✅
-Trend: ↑ Growing (+2 this month)
-
-Feature Utilization:
-Full Workflow:     ████████░░ 78%
-Bug Fix Mode:      ██████████ 95%
-Quick Change:      ███████░░░ 68%
-Code Review:       █████████░ 88%
-Documentation:     ██████░░░░ 55%
-
-Workflow Completion:
-Started:    156
-Completed:  142
-Abandoned:   14
-Rate: 91% ✅
-
-Abandonment Reasons:
-- Requirements changed: 8
-- Switched to quick mode: 4
-- Other: 2
-```
-
----
-
-### Pattern Learning Accuracy
-
-How accurately the system learns project patterns.
-
-```yaml
-pattern_learning:
-  categories:
-    naming_conventions: "Variable, function, file naming"
-    code_style: "Formatting, structure preferences"
-    architecture: "Module organization, patterns used"
-    testing: "Test structure, assertion styles"
-
-  measurement:
-    accuracy: "Correct suggestions / total suggestions"
-    confidence: "System confidence in patterns"
-    coverage: "Patterns detected / total patterns"
-```
-
-**Analysis:**
-```typescript
-interface PatternLearningMetrics {
-  overallAccuracy: number;
-  byCategory: {
-    namingConventions: { accuracy: number; coverage: number; examples: number };
-    codeStyle: { accuracy: number; coverage: number; examples: number };
-    architecture: { accuracy: number; coverage: number; examples: number };
-    testing: { accuracy: number; coverage: number; examples: number };
-  };
-  recentLearnings: PatternLearning[];
-  needsMoreData: string[];
-}
-
-interface PatternLearning {
-  pattern: string;
-  confidence: number;
-  examples: number;
-  lastUsed: Date;
-}
-```
-
-**Report:**
-```
-Pattern Learning Accuracy
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-Overall Accuracy: 87%
-
-By Category:
-Naming Conventions:  ████████░░ 92% (high confidence)
-Code Style:          █████████░ 89% (high confidence)
-Architecture:        ████████░░ 85% (medium confidence)
-Testing Patterns:    ███████░░░ 78% (learning)
-
-Recently Learned:
-✓ Component naming: use{Feature}Hook pattern
-✓ API calls: always use try-catch wrapper
-✓ Tests: describe → it → expect structure
-✓ Imports: group by external → internal → styles
-
-Still Learning (need more examples):
-• State management patterns (5 examples)
-• Error handling preferences (8 examples)
-• Database query patterns (3 examples)
-```
-
----
-
-### Suggestion Acceptance Rate
-
-Track how often AI suggestions are accepted.
-
-```yaml
-suggestions:
-  types:
-    code_generation: "Generated code accepted"
-    refactoring: "Refactoring suggestions accepted"
-    fixes: "Bug fix suggestions accepted"
-    documentation: "Doc suggestions accepted"
-
-  tracking:
-    accepted: "Used as-is or with minor edits"
-    modified: "Significantly modified before use"
-    rejected: "Not used"
-```
-
-**Metrics:**
-```typescript
-interface SuggestionMetrics {
-  overallAcceptance: number;
-  byType: {
-    codeGeneration: { accepted: number; modified: number; rejected: number };
-    refactoring: { accepted: number; modified: number; rejected: number };
-    fixes: { accepted: number; modified: number; rejected: number };
-    documentation: { accepted: number; modified: number; rejected: number };
-  };
-  trend: 'improving' | 'stable' | 'declining';
-  commonRejectionReasons: Map<string, number>;
-}
-```
-
-**Dashboard:**
-```
-Suggestion Acceptance - Last 30 Days
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-Overall Rate: 74% accepted, 18% modified, 8% rejected
-
-By Type:              Accepted  Modified  Rejected
-Code Generation       ████████░░ 78%   15%      7%
-Bug Fixes            █████████░ 85%   10%      5%
-Refactoring          ██████░░░░ 62%   25%     13%
-Documentation        ███████░░░ 71%   20%      9%
-
-Trend: ↑ Improving (+8% vs previous month)
-
-Common Rejection Reasons:
-1. Different style preference (35%)
-2. Over-engineered solution (28%)
-3. Missing edge case (20%)
-4. Performance concerns (12%)
-5. Other (5%)
-
-Learning Applied:
-• Now suggests simpler solutions
-• Better edge case handling
-• Aligned with team's style guide
-```
-
----
-
-### Time Savings
-
-Measure time saved through workflow automation.
-
-```yaml
-time_savings:
-  baseline:
-    feature_development: "Manual average time"
-    bug_fixing: "Manual average time"
-    code_review: "Manual average time"
-    documentation: "Manual average time"
-
-  measurement:
-    actual_time: "Time with workflow"
-    estimated_manual: "Estimated without workflow"
-    savings: "estimated_manual - actual_time"
-```
-
-**Tracking:**
-```typescript
-interface TimeSavings {
-  totalSaved: Duration;
-  byActivity: {
-    codebaseAnalysis: { saved: Duration; percentage: number };
-    codeGeneration: { saved: Duration; percentage: number };
-    testing: { saved: Duration; percentage: number };
-    codeReview: { saved: Duration; percentage: number };
-    documentation: { saved: Duration; percentage: number };
-  };
-  weeklyTrend: Duration[];
-  projectedAnnualSavings: Duration;
-}
-```
-
-**Report:**
-```
-Time Savings Analysis - Last 30 Days
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-Total Time Saved: 48.5 hours
-
-By Activity:
-Codebase Analysis:   ████████░░ 12h (45% reduction)
-Code Generation:     ██████████ 15h (55% reduction)
-Testing Setup:       ███████░░░  8h (35% reduction)
-Code Review:         █████░░░░░  6h (25% reduction)
-Documentation:       ███████░░░ 7.5h (40% reduction)
-
-Weekly Trend:
-Week 1:  ████████░░░░ 10h
-Week 2:  ██████████░░ 12h
-Week 3:  ███████████░ 13h
-Week 4:  ███████████░ 13.5h
-
-Projected Annual Savings: 582 hours
-At $100/hr: $58,200 value
-```
-
----
-
-### Error Reduction
-
-Track reduction in errors and rework.
-
-```yaml
-error_reduction:
-  types:
-    code_errors: "Bugs introduced"
-    style_violations: "Linting/style issues"
-    test_failures: "Tests failing on first run"
-    deployment_issues: "Deployment problems"
-
-  comparison:
-    baseline_period: "Before workflow adoption"
-    current_period: "With workflow"
-```
-
-**Analysis:**
-```typescript
-interface ErrorReduction {
-  overallReduction: number;
-  byType: {
-    codeErrors: { baseline: number; current: number; reduction: number };
-    styleViolations: { baseline: number; current: number; reduction: number };
-    testFailures: { baseline: number; current: number; reduction: number };
-    deploymentIssues: { baseline: number; current: number; reduction: number };
-  };
-  reworkReduction: {
-    reviewCycles: { before: number; after: number };
-    bugFixRework: { before: number; after: number };
-  };
-}
-```
-
-**Dashboard:**
-```
-Error Reduction Analysis
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-Overall Error Reduction: 42%
-
-By Type:            Before    After    Reduction
-Code Errors         8.2/week  4.1/week   -50%
-Style Violations    25/week   5/week     -80%
-Test Failures       12/week   6/week     -50%
-Deploy Issues       3/month   1/month    -67%
-
-Rework Reduction:
-Review Cycles:      2.8 avg → 1.6 avg    -43%
-Bug Fix Rework:     1.5/bug → 0.8/bug    -47%
-
-Key Improvements:
-✓ Auto-linting catches style issues
-✓ Pattern learning prevents common bugs
-✓ Pre-commit checks catch test failures
-✓ Deployment checklists reduce issues
-```
-
----
-
-## Learning System Performance
-
-### Composite Learning Score
-
-```typescript
-interface LearningScore {
-  overall: number;  // 0-100
-  breakdown: {
-    adoption: { score: number; weight: 0.20 };
-    patternAccuracy: { score: number; weight: 0.25 };
-    suggestionAcceptance: { score: number; weight: 0.25 };
-    timeSavings: { score: number; weight: 0.15 };
-    errorReduction: { score: number; weight: 0.15 };
-  };
-  trend: 'improving' | 'stable' | 'declining';
-  maturityLevel: 'initial' | 'developing' | 'established' | 'optimized';
-}
-```
-
-**Dashboard:**
-```
-Learning System Effectiveness
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-Overall Score: 76/100
-Maturity Level: ESTABLISHED
-
-Breakdown:
-Adoption (20%):          ████████░░ 80/100
-Pattern Accuracy (25%):  █████████░ 87/100
-Suggestion Accept (25%): ███████░░░ 74/100
-Time Savings (15%):      ███████░░░ 65/100
-Error Reduction (15%):   ███████░░░ 70/100
-
-Trend: ↑ Improving (+12 pts this quarter)
-
-Recommendations:
-1. More examples needed for testing patterns
-2. Simplify refactoring suggestions
-3. Add more project-specific terminology
-```
-
----
-
-## Configuration
-
-```yaml
-# proagents.config.yaml
-metrics:
-  learning:
-    enabled: true
-
-    tracking:
-      adoption: true
-      patterns: true
-      suggestions: true
-      time_savings: true
-      errors: true
-
-    baseline:
-      period: "2024-01-01 to 2024-01-31"
-      source: "historical_data"
-
-    reporting:
-      schedule: "monthly"
-      include_recommendations: true
-
-    privacy:
-      anonymize: true
-      no_code_samples: true
-```
-
----
-
-## Commands
-
-```bash
-# View learning dashboard
-pa:metrics learning
-
-# Adoption analysis
-pa:metrics learning --adoption
-
-# Pattern accuracy
-pa:metrics learning --patterns
-
-# Suggestion stats
-pa:metrics learning --suggestions
-
-# Time savings report
-pa:metrics learning --savings
-
-# Generate learning report
-pa:metrics learning --report
-```
-
----
-
-## Improving Learning Effectiveness
-
-### Increasing Adoption
-
-1. **Onboarding**: Provide workflow tutorials
-2. **Quick Wins**: Start with bug fix mode
-3. **Champions**: Identify power users
-4. **Feedback**: Act on user feedback
-
-### Improving Pattern Learning
-
-1. **Consistent Code**: Follow established patterns
-2. **Examples**: Provide more training examples
-3. **Corrections**: Correct AI mistakes promptly
-4. **Documentation**: Document patterns explicitly
-
-### Increasing Suggestion Acceptance
-
-1. **Simpler Solutions**: Prefer straightforward code
-2. **Style Alignment**: Match team preferences
-3. **Context Awareness**: Consider project context
-4. **Iteration**: Learn from rejections
-
-### Maximizing Time Savings
-
-1. **Full Workflow**: Use all phases consistently
-2. **Automation**: Automate repetitive tasks
-3. **Templates**: Create project-specific templates
-4. **Shortcuts**: Learn and use quick commands

package/.proagents/migrations/README.md

@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
-# Migration Guides
-
-Migrate from other tools and workflows to ProAgents.
-
----
-
-## Available Migrations
-
-| From | Guide | Difficulty |
-|------|-------|------------|
-| Cursor Rules | [cursor-rules.md](./from-cursor-rules.md) | Easy |
-| Claude Projects | [claude-projects.md](./from-claude-projects.md) | Easy |
-| GitHub Copilot | [github-copilot.md](./from-github-copilot.md) | Easy |
-| Custom Workflows | [custom-workflows.md](./from-custom-workflows.md) | Medium |
-
----
-
-## Quick Migration
-
-### Automated Migration
-
-```bash
-# Detect and migrate from existing setup
-proagents migrate --detect
-
-# Migrate from specific tool
-proagents migrate --from cursor-rules
-proagents migrate --from claude-projects
-
-# Preview migration without applying
-proagents migrate --from cursor-rules --dry-run
-```
-
-### Manual Migration
-
-1. Install ProAgents
-2. Run `proagents init`
-3. Import existing configurations
-4. Verify and adjust settings
-
----
-
-## What Gets Migrated
-
-| Source | Migrated To |
-|--------|-------------|
-| Cursor `.cursorrules` | ProAgents standards + IDE rules |
-| Claude Project Instructions | ProAgents prompts + standards |
-| Copilot Instructions | ProAgents standards + IDE rules |
-| Custom Rules | ProAgents rules engine |
-| Code Conventions | ProAgents standards |
-
----
-
-## Migration Checklist
-
-- [ ] Backup existing configuration
-- [ ] Run migration in dry-run mode first
-- [ ] Review generated ProAgents config
-- [ ] Test with a small feature
-- [ ] Update team documentation
-- [ ] Remove old configuration (optional)
-
----
-
-## Getting Help
-
-```bash
-# Show migration help
-proagents migrate --help
-
-# Validate migration result
-proagents validate
-
-# Compare configurations
-proagents migrate diff --from cursor-rules
-```