proagents 1.6.17 → 1.6.18

package/.proagents/metrics/code-quality-kpis.md

@@ -1,461 +0,0 @@
-# Code Quality KPIs
-
-Measure and track code health, maintainability, and technical debt.
-
----
-
-## Prompt Template
-
-```
-Analyze code quality metrics for this codebase:
-
-Project: {project_name}
-Language: {language}
-Path: {code_path}
-
-Analyze and report on:
-1. Test coverage (line, branch, function)
-2. Code complexity (cyclomatic, cognitive)
-3. Technical debt estimation
-4. Code duplication
-5. Dependency health
-6. Security vulnerabilities
-
-Compare against:
-- Previous period: {previous_metrics}
-- Industry standards: {benchmarks}
-- Team targets: {targets}
-
-Provide:
-- Current quality score
-- Trend analysis
-- Critical issues
-- Improvement priorities
-```
-
----
-
-## Key Metrics
-
-### Test Coverage
-
-```yaml
-test_coverage:
-  types:
-    line_coverage: "Lines executed by tests"
-    branch_coverage: "Decision branches covered"
-    function_coverage: "Functions called by tests"
-    statement_coverage: "Statements executed"
-
-  targets:
-    minimum: 70%
-    recommended: 80%
-    critical_paths: 95%
-
-  exclusions:
-    - "**/*.test.ts"
-    - "**/mocks/**"
-    - "**/types/**"
-```
-
-**Collection:**
-```typescript
-interface CoverageMetrics {
-  lines: { covered: number; total: number; percentage: number };
-  branches: { covered: number; total: number; percentage: number };
-  functions: { covered: number; total: number; percentage: number };
-  statements: { covered: number; total: number; percentage: number };
-  byFile: Map<string, FileCoverage>;
-  uncoveredFiles: string[];
-}
-
-async function collectCoverage(coverageFile: string): Promise<CoverageMetrics> {
-  const coverage = await parseCoverageReport(coverageFile);
-
-  return {
-    lines: calculateLineCoverage(coverage),
-    branches: calculateBranchCoverage(coverage),
-    functions: calculateFunctionCoverage(coverage),
-    statements: calculateStatementCoverage(coverage),
-    byFile: mapByFile(coverage),
-    uncoveredFiles: findUncoveredFiles(coverage),
-  };
-}
-```
-
-**Dashboard:**
-```
-Test Coverage Summary
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-Overall:    82.3% ████████░░ ✅
-
-By Type:
-Lines:      84.1% ████████░░ ✅
-Branches:   76.5% ███████░░░ ⚠️
-Functions:  89.2% █████████░ ✅
-Statements: 83.8% ████████░░ ✅
-
-Lowest Coverage:
-- src/utils/parser.ts: 45%
-- src/api/legacy.ts: 52%
-- src/services/payment.ts: 61%
-```
-
----
-
-### Code Complexity
-
-```yaml
-complexity:
-  metrics:
-    cyclomatic: "Number of decision paths"
-    cognitive: "Mental effort to understand"
-    halstead: "Vocabulary and volume"
-
-  thresholds:
-    cyclomatic:
-      low: "1-5"
-      medium: "6-10"
-      high: "11-20"
-      very_high: ">20"
-
-    cognitive:
-      low: "1-5"
-      medium: "6-15"
-      high: "16-25"
-      very_high: ">25"
-
-  targets:
-    average_cyclomatic: "< 10"
-    max_cyclomatic: "< 20"
-    average_cognitive: "< 15"
-```
-
-**Analysis:**
-```typescript
-interface ComplexityAnalysis {
-  averageCyclomatic: number;
-  maxCyclomatic: { value: number; file: string; function: string };
-  averageCognitive: number;
-  distribution: {
-    low: number;
-    medium: number;
-    high: number;
-    veryHigh: number;
-  };
-  hotspots: ComplexityHotspot[];
-}
-
-interface ComplexityHotspot {
-  file: string;
-  function: string;
-  cyclomatic: number;
-  cognitive: number;
-  recommendation: string;
-}
-```
-
-**Report:**
-```
-Complexity Analysis
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-Average Cyclomatic: 7.2 ✅ (target: <10)
-Average Cognitive:  12.4 ✅ (target: <15)
-
-Distribution:
-Low (1-5):      45% ████████████████░░░░
-Medium (6-10):  35% ██████████████░░░░░░
-High (11-20):   15% ██████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
-Very High (>20): 5% ██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
-
-Hotspots (needs refactoring):
-1. processOrder() - CC: 28, Cog: 35
-   → Split into smaller functions
-2. validateInput() - CC: 22, Cog: 28
-   → Extract validation rules
-3. parseConfig() - CC: 19, Cog: 24
-   → Use strategy pattern
-```
-
----
-
-### Technical Debt
-
-```yaml
-technical_debt:
-  calculation:
-    method: "time_to_fix"  # time_to_fix, sqale, custom
-
-  categories:
-    code_smells: 0.5  # hours per issue
-    bugs: 2.0
-    vulnerabilities: 4.0
-    duplications: 0.25
-    complexity: 1.0
-
-  thresholds:
-    ratio:
-      A: "< 5%"
-      B: "5-10%"
-      C: "10-20%"
-      D: "20-50%"
-      E: "> 50%"
-```
-
-**Tracking:**
-```typescript
-interface TechnicalDebt {
-  totalHours: number;
-  totalDays: number;
-  ratio: number;  // debt / development time
-  grade: 'A' | 'B' | 'C' | 'D' | 'E';
-  byCategory: {
-    codeSmells: number;
-    bugs: number;
-    vulnerabilities: number;
-    duplications: number;
-    complexity: number;
-  };
-  trend: 'improving' | 'stable' | 'degrading';
-  newDebt: number;
-  resolvedDebt: number;
-}
-```
-
-**Dashboard:**
-```
-Technical Debt Summary
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-Total Debt:    24.5 days
-Debt Ratio:    8.2% (Grade: B)
-Trend:         ↓ Improving (-12% this month)
-
-By Category:
-Code Smells:   12.0 days ████████████░░░░░░░░
-Complexity:     6.5 days ██████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
-Duplications:   3.0 days ███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
-Bugs:           2.5 days ██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
-Vulnerabilities: 0.5 days ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
-
-This Period:
-New Debt Added:    3.2 days
-Debt Resolved:     5.8 days
-Net Change:       -2.6 days ✅
-```
-
----
-
-### Code Duplication
-
-```yaml
-duplication:
-  thresholds:
-    acceptable: "< 3%"
-    concerning: "3-5%"
-    problematic: "> 5%"
-
-  detection:
-    min_lines: 6
-    min_tokens: 50
-    ignore_imports: true
-    ignore_comments: true
-
-  exclusions:
-    - "**/*.test.ts"
-    - "**/generated/**"
-```
-
-**Analysis:**
-```
-Code Duplication Report
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-Duplication Rate: 2.8% ✅
-
-Top Duplicated Blocks:
-1. Error handling pattern (12 occurrences)
-   Files: api/*.ts
-   Lines: 15-28
-   → Extract to shared utility
-
-2. Validation logic (8 occurrences)
-   Files: services/*.ts
-   Lines: 45-62
-   → Create validation decorator
-
-3. API response formatting (6 occurrences)
-   Files: controllers/*.ts
-   Lines: 10-18
-   → Use response middleware
-```
-
----
-
-### Dependency Health
-
-```yaml
-dependencies:
-  metrics:
-    outdated_count: "Dependencies behind latest"
-    vulnerable_count: "Dependencies with CVEs"
-    unused_count: "Imported but not used"
-    direct_vs_transitive: "Direct dependency ratio"
-
-  thresholds:
-    outdated_warning: 5
-    outdated_critical: 15
-    vulnerable_any: "critical"
-
-  scanning:
-    schedule: "daily"
-    sources:
-      - "npm audit"
-      - "snyk"
-      - "github advisories"
-```
-
-**Report:**
-```
-Dependency Health Check
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-Total Dependencies: 145 (42 direct, 103 transitive)
-
-Status:
-Up to Date:    128 (88%)
-Minor Behind:   12 (8%)
-Major Behind:    5 (3%)
-
-Security:
-Vulnerabilities: 2
-├─ Critical: 0
-├─ High:     1 ⚠️ (lodash - prototype pollution)
-├─ Medium:   1
-└─ Low:      0
-
-Recommendations:
-1. npm update lodash@4.17.21 (security fix)
-2. npm update react@18.2.1 (minor update)
-3. npm update typescript@5.3.0 (minor update)
-```
-
----
-
-## Quality Score
-
-### Composite Quality Index
-
-```typescript
-interface QualityScore {
-  overall: number;  // 0-100
-  grade: 'A' | 'B' | 'C' | 'D' | 'F';
-  breakdown: {
-    coverage: { score: number; weight: 0.25 };
-    complexity: { score: number; weight: 0.20 };
-    duplication: { score: number; weight: 0.15 };
-    technicalDebt: { score: number; weight: 0.20 };
-    dependencies: { score: number; weight: 0.10 };
-    security: { score: number; weight: 0.10 };
-  };
-  trend: 'improving' | 'stable' | 'degrading';
-}
-
-function calculateQualityScore(metrics: CodeMetrics): QualityScore {
-  const breakdown = {
-    coverage: { score: scoreCoverage(metrics.coverage), weight: 0.25 },
-    complexity: { score: scoreComplexity(metrics.complexity), weight: 0.20 },
-    duplication: { score: scoreDuplication(metrics.duplication), weight: 0.15 },
-    technicalDebt: { score: scoreDebt(metrics.debt), weight: 0.20 },
-    dependencies: { score: scoreDependencies(metrics.deps), weight: 0.10 },
-    security: { score: scoreSecurity(metrics.vulnerabilities), weight: 0.10 },
-  };
-
-  const overall = Object.values(breakdown).reduce(
-    (sum, item) => sum + item.score * item.weight,
-    0
-  );
-
-  return {
-    overall,
-    grade: getGrade(overall),
-    breakdown,
-    trend: calculateTrend(metrics.history),
-  };
-}
-```
-
-**Dashboard:**
-```
-Code Quality Score
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-Overall Score: 78/100 (Grade: B)
-Trend: ↑ Improving (+5 from last month)
-
-Breakdown:
-Coverage (25%):      82/100 ████████░░
-Complexity (20%):    75/100 ███████░░░
-Duplication (15%):   88/100 █████████░
-Tech Debt (20%):     72/100 ███████░░░
-Dependencies (10%):  85/100 ████████░░
-Security (10%):      70/100 ███████░░░
-
-Top Improvement Areas:
-1. Reduce tech debt in legacy modules
-2. Add tests to payment service
-3. Simplify order processing logic
-```
-
----
-
-## Commands
-
-```bash
-# View quality dashboard
-pa:metrics quality
-
-# Detailed coverage report
-pa:metrics coverage --detailed
-
-# Complexity hotspots
-pa:metrics complexity --hotspots
-
-# Technical debt breakdown
-pa:metrics debt --by-category
-
-# Dependency audit
-pa:metrics dependencies --audit
-
-# Generate quality report
-pa:metrics quality --report --format pdf
-```
-
----
-
-## Configuration
-
-```yaml
-# proagents.config.yaml
-metrics:
-  code_quality:
-    enabled: true
-
-    coverage:
-      tool: "jest"  # jest, nyc, istanbul
-      report_path: "./coverage/lcov.info"
-      minimum: 80
-
-    complexity:
-      tool: "eslint"  # eslint, sonar
-      max_cyclomatic: 15
-      max_cognitive: 20
-
-    duplication:
-      tool: "jscpd"
-      threshold: 3
-
-    debt:
-      calculation: "sonar"
-      target_ratio: 5
-
-    dependencies:
-      audit_tool: "npm"
-      block_on_critical: true
-```