port-nuker 1.0.1 → 1.0.3

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/django__django-11039.patch

@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of Django's codebase and the issue description, I can create the patch. The issue is in the `sqlmigrate` management command where `self.output_transaction` should consider both `migration.atomic` AND `connection.features.can_rollback_ddl`.
-
-Let me provide the patch based on the Django codebase structure:
-
-```
---- a/django/core/management/commands/sqlmigrate.py
-+++ b/django/core/management/commands/sqlmigrate.py
-@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ class Command(BaseCommand):
-         plan = [(executor.loader.graph.nodes[targets[0]], options['backwards'])]
- 
-         # Show BEGIN/COMMIT around output only for atomic migrations
--        self.output_transaction = migration.atomic
-+        self.output_transaction = migration.atomic and connection.features.can_rollback_ddl
- 
-         # Collect output
-         with connection.schema_editor(collect_sql=True, atomic=migration.atomic) as schema_editor:
---- a/tests/migrations/test_commands.py
-+++ b/tests/migrations/test_commands.py
-@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
- import datetime
- import os
-+from unittest import mock
- 
- from django.apps import apps
- from django.core.management import CommandError, call_command
-@@ -1152,6 +1153,18 @@ class MigrateTests(MigrationTestBase):
-         self.assertNotIn(end_transaction_sql.lower(), output.lower())
- 
-     @override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations"})
-+    def test_sqlmigrate_for_non_transactional_databases(self):
-+        """
-+        sqlmigrate should not wrap output in BEGIN/COMMIT if the database
-+        doesn't support transactional DDL.
-+        """
-+        out = io.StringIO()
-+        with mock.patch.object(connection.features, 'can_rollback_ddl', False):
-+            call_command("sqlmigrate", "migrations", "0001", stdout=out)
-+        output = out.getvalue().lower()
-+        self.assertNotIn(connection.ops.start_transaction_sql().lower(), output)
-+        self.assertNotIn(connection.ops.end_transaction_sql().lower(), output)
-+
-+    @override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations"})
-     def test_sqlmigrate_backwards(self):
-         """
-         sqlmigrate outputs reverse migrations.
-```
-
---- a/django/core/management/commands/sqlmigrate.py
-+++ b/django/core/management/commands/sqlmigrate.py
-@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ class Command(BaseCommand):
-         plan = [(executor.loader.graph.nodes[targets[0]], options['backwards'])]
- 
-         # Show BEGIN/COMMIT around output only for atomic migrations
--        self.output_transaction = migration.atomic
-+        self.output_transaction = migration.atomic and connection.features.can_rollback_ddl
- 
-         # Collect output
-         with connection.schema_editor(collect_sql=True, atomic=migration.atomic) as schema_editor:
---- a/tests/migrations/test_commands.py
-+++ b/tests/migrations/test_commands.py
-@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
- import datetime
- import os
-+from unittest import mock
- 
- from django.apps import apps
- from django.core.management import CommandError, call_command
-@@ -1152,6 +1153,18 @@ class MigrateTests(MigrationTestBase):
-         self.assertNotIn(end_transaction_sql.lower(), output.lower())
- 
-     @override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations"})
-+    def test_sqlmigrate_for_non_transactional_databases(self):
-+        """
-+        sqlmigrate should not wrap output in BEGIN/COMMIT if the database
-+        doesn't support transactional DDL.
-+        """
-+        out = io.StringIO()
-+        with mock.patch.object(connection.features, 'can_rollback_ddl', False):
-+            call_command("sqlmigrate", "migrations", "0001", stdout=out)
-+        output = out.getvalue().lower()
-+        self.assertNotIn(connection.ops.start_transaction_sql().lower(), output)
-+        self.assertNotIn(connection.ops.end_transaction_sql().lower(), output)
-+
-+    @override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations"})
-     def test_sqlmigrate_backwards(self):
-         """
-         sqlmigrate outputs reverse migrations.

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/django__django-11049.patch

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the Django codebase, the DurationField error message is defined in `django/forms/fields.py`. The error message format string needs to be corrected from `[DD] [HH:[MM:]]ss[.uuuuuu]` to `[DD] [[HH:]MM:]ss[.uuuuuu]`.
-
---- a/django/forms/fields.py
-+++ b/django/forms/fields.py
-@@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ class DurationField(Field):
-     default_error_messages = {
-         'invalid': _('Enter a valid duration.'),
--        'overflow': _('The number of days must be between {min_days} and {max_days}.')
-+        'overflow': _('The number of days must be between {min_days} and {max_days}.')
-     }
- 
-     def prepare_value(self, value):
-
-Let me provide the correct patch based on the Django source. The error message that needs to be fixed contains the format description:
-
---- a/django/forms/fields.py
-+++ b/django/forms/fields.py
-@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ class DecimalField(IntegerField):
- 
- class DurationField(Field):
-     default_error_messages = {
--        'invalid': _('Enter a valid duration.'),
-+        'invalid': _('Enter a valid duration.'),
-     }

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/django__django-11099.patch

@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
-This is a skill repository, not the Django repository. The issue is from Django's repository. Based on the issue description, I can generate the patch directly since it clearly describes the fix needed for Django's `contrib/auth/validators.py` file.
-
-The issue states that:
-1. `ASCIIUsernameValidator` and `UnicodeUsernameValidator` use `r'^[\w.@+-]+$'`
-2. The fix is to change to `r'\A[\w.@+-]+\Z'`
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/contrib/auth/validators.py
-+++ b/django/contrib/auth/validators.py
-@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ from django.utils.translation import gettext_lazy as _
- 
- @deconstructible
- class ASCIIUsernameValidator(validators.RegexValidator):
--    regex = r'^[\w.@+-]+$'
-+    regex = r'\A[\w.@+-]+\Z'
-     message = _(
-         'Enter a valid username. This value may contain only English letters, '
-         'numbers, and @/./+/-/_ characters.'
-@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ class ASCIIUsernameValidator(validators.RegexValidator):
- 
- @deconstructible
- class UnicodeUsernameValidator(validators.RegexValidator):
--    regex = r'^[\w.@+-]+$'
-+    regex = r'\A[\w.@+-]+\Z'
-     message = _(
-         'Enter a valid username. This value may contain only letters, '
-         'numbers, and @/./+/-/_ characters.'

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/django__django-11133.patch

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description and hints provided, I can generate the patch. The issue is in the `make_bytes` method of `HttpResponseBase` class in `django/http/response.py`. The method needs to handle `memoryview` objects by converting them to bytes.
-
-From the hints:
-1. The `make_bytes` method should be adapted to handle memoryview objects by casting them to bytes
-2. `force_bytes` already has memoryview support (added in commit d680a3f4477056c69629b0421db4bb254b8c69d0)
-3. The fix is to add a check for memoryview and convert it to bytes
-
-The typical structure of `make_bytes` checks for different types (string, bytes, etc.) and returns the appropriate bytes representation. Adding memoryview support would involve checking `isinstance(value, memoryview)` and returning `bytes(value)`.
-
---- a/django/http/response.py
-+++ b/django/http/response.py
-@@ -230,6 +230,9 @@ class HttpResponseBase:
-     def make_bytes(self, value):
-         """Turn a value into a bytestring encoded in the output charset."""
-+        # Handle memoryview
-+        if isinstance(value, memoryview):
-+            return bytes(value)
-         # Per PEP 3333, this response body must be bytes. To avoid returning
-         # an instance of a subclass, this function returns `bytes(googled)`. This
-         # doesn't make a copy when `value` already contains bytes.

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/django__django-11179.patch

@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of Django's deletion code and the issue description, I can provide the fix. The issue is that when `delete()` is called on a single model instance that has no dependencies (fast-deletable), the primary key is not set to None after deletion. This happens in the `Collector.delete()` method where fast-delete path doesn't clear the PK like the regular delete path does.
-
-Looking at the Django codebase at the referenced commit, the issue is in `django/db/models/deletion.py`. The fast delete path around line 280 doesn't set the instance's PK to None after deletion, while the regular delete path (lines 324-326) does clear PKs for all deleted instances.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/db/models/deletion.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/deletion.py
-@@ -277,6 +277,10 @@ class Collector:
-             # fast deletes
-             for qs in self.fast_deletes:
-                 count = qs._raw_delete(using=self.using)
-+                if count:
-+                    for obj in qs:
-+                        setattr(obj, obj._meta.pk.attname, None)
-+
-             deleted_counter[qs.model._meta.label] += count
-
-             # update fields
-@@ -320,6 +324,8 @@ class Collector:
-                     if pk is not None:
-                         setattr(obj, obj._meta.pk.attname, None)
-         return sum(deleted_counter.values()), dict(deleted_counter)
-
-Wait, I need to reconsider this. The issue states it's about deleting a single instance without dependencies. Let me look at this more carefully.
-
-The problem is in the fast delete path when deleting a single instance. The `delete()` method on a model instance calls `Collector.collect()` and then `Collector.delete()`. When the instance has no dependencies, it takes the fast delete path. But after the raw delete, the PK of the original instance isn't cleared.
-
-Looking at the hints, the fix should be simpler - just setting the PK to None on the instance being deleted when fast_deletes is used. The issue is that `self.fast_deletes` contains querysets, not the original instance.
-
-Let me reconsider: when `can_fast_delete` returns True for a single instance, the instance gets added to `self.fast_deletes` as a queryset. After `_raw_delete()` is called, we need to set the PK to None on the original instance.
-
-Based on the issue and hints, the correct fix is:
-
---- a/django/db/models/deletion.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/deletion.py
-@@ -278,6 +278,11 @@ class Collector:
-         with transaction.atomic(using=self.using, savepoint=False):
-             # send pre_delete signals
-             for model, obj in self.instances_with_model():
-                 if not model._meta.auto_created:
-                     signals.pre_delete.send(
-                         sender=model, instance=obj, using=self.using
-                     )
-
-             # fast deletes
-             for qs in self.fast_deletes:
-                 count = qs._raw_delete(using=self.using)
-                 deleted_counter[qs.model._meta.label] += count

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/django__django-11283.patch

@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description and the hints provided, I can analyze the problem and generate the fix. The issue is in Django's `django/contrib/auth/migrations/0011_update_proxy_permissions.py` migration file. Let me reconstruct the fix based on the detailed bug report.
-
-The problem:
-1. When a regular model is deleted and recreated as a proxy model with the same name, permissions already exist
-2. The migration tries to update permissions for proxy models but fails with IntegrityError because the permission already exists with the content type it's trying to update to
-3. The fix should handle the case where permissions already exist by reusing them instead of trying to create duplicates
-
-Based on the issue (commit reference 181fb60159e54d442d3610f4afba6f066a6dac05 mentioned as the regression), the migration needs to be updated to handle the case where a permission with the target content_type_id and codename already exists.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/contrib/auth/migrations/0011_update_proxy_permissions.py
-+++ b/django/contrib/auth/migrations/0011_update_proxy_permissions.py
-@@ -24,9 +24,24 @@ def update_proxy_model_permissions(apps, schema_editor, reverse=False):
-             proxy_content_type = ContentType.objects.get_for_model(Model, for_concrete_model=False)
-         old_content_type = cycled[concrete_content_type.pk]
-         new_content_type = cycled[proxy_content_type.pk]
--        Permission.objects.filter(
-+
-+        # Get all permissions for this proxy model
-+        permissions = Permission.objects.filter(
-             permissions_query,
-             content_type=old_content_type,
--        ).update(content_type=new_content_type)
-+        )
-+        for permission in permissions:
-+            # Check if there's already a permission with the new content type
-+            # and the same codename. If so, delete the old permission.
-+            # Otherwise, update the content type.
-+            try:
-+                with transaction.atomic():
-+                    permission.content_type = new_content_type
-+                    permission.save()
-+            except IntegrityError:
-+                # Permission already exists with the new content type,
-+                # delete the old one.
-+                permission.delete()
- 
- 
- def revert_proxy_model_permissions(apps, schema_editor):
---- a/django/contrib/auth/migrations/0011_update_proxy_permissions.py
-+++ b/django/contrib/auth/migrations/0011_update_proxy_permissions.py
-@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
-+from django.db import IntegrityError, transaction
-+
- from django.db import migrations
- from django.db.models import Q

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/django__django-11422.patch

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of Django and the issue description, I can construct the patch. The issue is in the `iter_modules_and_files` function in `django/utils/autoreload.py`. The problem is that when a module is `__main__` (like `manage.py`), its `__spec__` attribute is `None`, so it gets skipped by the current logic.
-
-The fix needs to handle the `__main__` module specially by checking for `__file__` attribute when `__spec__` is `None`.
-
-Looking at the regression commit mentioned (c8720e7696ca41f3262d5369365cc1bd72a216ca) and the issue hints, the fix should:
-1. Check if the module is `__main__` and has a `__file__` attribute
-2. If so, include that file in the watched files
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/utils/autoreload.py
-+++ b/django/utils/autoreload.py
-@@ -113,6 +113,12 @@ def iter_modules_and_files(modules, extra_files):
-     sys_file_paths = []
-     for module in modules:
-         # During debugging (with PyDev) the 'ichunks.py' script is copied to a temp
-+        # __main__ (usually manage.py) doesn't have a __spec__ set, so we check
-+        # for __file__ directly.
-+        if getattr(module, '__name__', None) == '__main__':
-+            if hasattr(module, '__file__'):
-+                sys_file_paths.append(module.__file__)
-+            continue
-         # dir. See https://github.com/fabioz/PyDev.Debugger/blob/2d5b98f0/
-         # _pydevd_bundle/pydevd_filtering.py#L25
-         if getattr(module, "__spec__", None) is None:

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/django__django-11564.patch

@@ -1,285 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of Django's codebase and the issue description, I'll create a patch that adds SCRIPT_NAME support to STATIC_URL and MEDIA_URL. The key changes need to be made in:
-
-1. `django/core/files/storage.py` - FileSystemStorage to use get_script_prefix()
-2. `django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py` - StaticFilesStorage to properly handle SCRIPT_NAME
-3. `django/templatetags/static.py` - The static template tag
-
-Let me create the patch based on my understanding of Django's architecture:
-
-```
---- a/django/conf/__init__.py
-+++ b/django/conf/__init__.py
-@@ -81,6 +81,20 @@ class LazySettings(LazyObject):
-             warnings.warn(EMPTY_SETTINGS_WARNING)
-         self._wrapped = Settings(settings_module)
- 
-+    @property
-+    def _MEDIA_URL(self):
-+        return self.__getattr__('MEDIA_URL')
-+
-+    @_MEDIA_URL.setter
-+    def _MEDIA_URL(self, value):
-+        pass
-+
-+    @property
-+    def _STATIC_URL(self):
-+        return self.__getattr__('STATIC_URL')
-+
-+    @_STATIC_URL.setter
-+    def _STATIC_URL(self, value):
-+        pass
-+
-     def __repr__(self):
-         # Hardcode the class name as otherwise it yields 'Settings'.
-         if self._wrapped is empty:
---- a/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py
-+++ b/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py
-@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ from django.utils.functional import LazyObject
- 
- class StaticFilesStorage(FileSystemStorage):
-     """
--    Standard file system storage for static files.
-+    Standard file system storage for static files with SCRIPT_NAME support.
- 
-     The defaults for ``location`` and ``base_url`` are
-     ``STATIC_ROOT`` and ``STATIC_URL``.
-@@ -27,6 +27,17 @@ class StaticFilesStorage(FileSystemStorage):
-             location = settings.STATIC_ROOT
-         if base_url is None:
-             base_url = settings.STATIC_URL
-+        if base_url and not self._is_absolute_url(base_url):
-+            from django.urls import get_script_prefix
-+            base_url = '%s%s' % (get_script_prefix(), base_url.lstrip('/'))
-         super().__init__(location, base_url, *args, **kwargs)
-         # FileSystemStorage fallbacks to MEDIA_ROOT when location
-         # is empty string.
-+        if not location:
-+            self.location = settings.STATIC_ROOT
-+
-+    def _is_absolute_url(self, url):
-+        """
-+        Check if a URL is absolute (includes a scheme).
-+        """
-+        return url.startswith('http://') or url.startswith('https://') or url.startswith('//')
---- a/django/core/files/storage.py
-+++ b/django/core/files/storage.py
-@@ -258,6 +258,14 @@ class FileSystemStorage(Storage):
-             base_url = settings.MEDIA_URL
-         self._base_url = base_url
-         self._location = location
-+        if base_url and not self._is_absolute_url(base_url):
-+            from django.urls import get_script_prefix
-+            self._base_url = '%s%s' % (get_script_prefix(), base_url.lstrip('/'))
- 
-     @cached_property
-     def base_location(self):
-@@ -280,6 +288,13 @@ class FileSystemStorage(Storage):
-             self._base_url = setting_changed.value
-         return self._base_url
- 
-+    def _is_absolute_url(self, url):
-+        """
-+        Check if a URL is absolute (includes a scheme or is protocol-relative).
-+        """
-+        return url.startswith('http://') or url.startswith('https://') or url.startswith('//')
-+
-     def _clear_cached_properties(self, setting, **kwargs):
-         """Reset setting based property values."""
-         if setting == 'MEDIA_ROOT':
---- a/django/templatetags/static.py
-+++ b/django/templatetags/static.py
-@@ -67,6 +67,18 @@ class StaticNode(template.Node):
- 
- 
- def static(path):
-+    """
-+    Return the absolute URL to a static file, respecting SCRIPT_NAME.
-+    """
-+    from django.conf import settings
-+    from django.urls import get_script_prefix
-+    
-+    url = getattr(settings, 'STATIC_URL', '')
-+    if url and not (url.startswith('http://') or url.startswith('https://') or url.startswith('//')):
-+        prefix = get_script_prefix()
-+        if prefix and not url.startswith(prefix):
-+            url = '%s%s' % (prefix.rstrip('/'), url)
-+    return urljoin(url, quote(path))
--    return urljoin(getattr(settings, 'STATIC_URL', ''), quote(path))
-```
-
-Wait, I need to reconsider the approach. Looking at the issue and the hints more carefully, the proper approach would be to:
-
-1. Modify the storage classes to respect SCRIPT_NAME when generating URLs
-2. The static template tag and static() function should use the storage to get URLs
-
-Let me create a more accurate patch:
-
---- a/django/conf/__init__.py
-+++ b/django/conf/__init__.py
-@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ import warnings
- from pathlib import Path
- 
- from django.conf import global_settings
-+from django.core.exceptions import ImproperlyConfigured
- from django.utils.deprecation import RemovedInDjango40Warning
- from django.utils.functional import LazyObject, empty
- 
---- a/django/core/files/storage.py
-+++ b/django/core/files/storage.py
-@@ -278,9 +278,23 @@ class FileSystemStorage(Storage):
- 
-     @cached_property
-     def base_url(self):
--        if self._base_url is not None and not self._base_url.endswith('/'):
-+        return self._value_or_setting(self._base_url, settings.MEDIA_URL)
-+
-+    def _value_or_setting(self, value, setting):
-+        if value is None:
-+            value = setting
-+        if value is not None and not value.endswith('/'):
-             self._base_url = setting_changed.value
--        return self._base_url
-+        return self._add_script_prefix(value)
-+
-+    def _add_script_prefix(self, url):
-+        if url and not (url.startswith('http://') or url.startswith('https://') or url.startswith('//')):
-+            from django.urls import get_script_prefix
-+            prefix = get_script_prefix()
-+            if prefix != '/' and not url.startswith(prefix):
-+                url = prefix.rstrip('/') + url
-+        return url
- 
-     def _clear_cached_properties(self, setting, **kwargs):
-         """Reset setting based property values."""
---- a/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py
-+++ b/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py
-@@ -29,6 +29,17 @@ class StaticFilesStorage(FileSystemStorage):
-         if not location:
-             self.location = settings.STATIC_ROOT
- 
-+    @cached_property
-+    def base_url(self):
-+        return self._value_or_setting(self._base_url, settings.STATIC_URL)
-+
- 
- class HashedFilesMixin:
-     default_template = """url("%(url)s")"""
---- a/django/templatetags/static.py
-+++ b/django/templatetags/static.py
-@@ -67,6 +67,16 @@ class StaticNode(template.Node):
- 
- 
- def static(path):
--    return urljoin(getattr(settings, 'STATIC_URL', ''), quote(path))
-+    """
-+    Return the URL of a static file, respecting SCRIPT_NAME.
-+    """
-+    url = getattr(settings, 'STATIC_URL', '')
-+    if url and not (url.startswith('http://') or url.startswith('https://') or url.startswith('//')):
-+        from django.urls import get_script_prefix
-+        prefix = get_script_prefix()
-+        if prefix != '/' and not url.startswith(prefix):
-+            url = prefix.rstrip('/') + url
-+    return urljoin(url, quote(path))
- 
- 
- @register.tag('static')
-
-Actually, let me look at this more carefully. The issue mentions using `get_script_prefix()` like `reverse()` does. Let me create a cleaner patch that properly addresses the issue:
-
---- a/django/core/files/storage.py
-+++ b/django/core/files/storage.py
-@@ -277,10 +277,25 @@ class FileSystemStorage(Storage):
-         return os.path.join(self.location, name)
- 
-     @cached_property
-     def base_url(self):
-         if self._base_url is not None and not self._base_url.endswith('/'):
-             self._base_url += '/'
--        return self._base_url
-+        return self._value_or_setting(self._base_url, settings.MEDIA_URL)
-+
-+    def _value_or_setting(self, value, setting):
-+        if value is None:
-+            value = setting
-+        return self._add_script_prefix(value)
-+
-+    def _add_script_prefix(self, url):
-+        """Prepend the script prefix to relative URLs."""
-+        if url and not (url.startswith('http://') or url.startswith('https://') or url.startswith('//')):
-+            from django.urls import get_script_prefix
-+            prefix = get_script_prefix()
-+            if prefix != '/' and not url.startswith(prefix):
-+                url = prefix.rstrip('/') + url
-+        return url
- 
-     def _clear_cached_properties(self, setting, **kwargs):
-         """Reset setting based property values."""
-
-Let me now provide the complete unified diff patch:
-
---- a/django/core/files/storage.py
-+++ b/django/core/files/storage.py
-@@ -277,10 +277,22 @@ class FileSystemStorage(Storage):
-         return os.path.join(self.location, name)
- 
-     @cached_property
-     def base_url(self):
-         if self._base_url is not None and not self._base_url.endswith('/'):
-             self._base_url += '/'
--        return self._base_url
-+        return self._add_script_prefix(self._base_url)
-+
-+    def _add_script_prefix(self, url):
-+        """
-+        Prepend the script prefix to relative URLs.
-+        
-+        If SCRIPT_NAME is set and the URL is relative (doesn't include scheme),
-+        prepend the script prefix to ensure correct URL generation when Django
-+        is deployed at a subpath.
-+        """
-+        if url and url.startswith('/') and not url.startswith('//'):
-+            from django.urls import get_script_prefix
-+            prefix = get_script_prefix()
-+            if prefix != '/':
-+                url = prefix.rstrip('/') + url
-+        return url
- 
-     def _clear_cached_properties(self, setting, **kwargs):
-         """Reset setting based property values."""
---- a/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py
-+++ b/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py
-@@ -29,6 +29,14 @@ class StaticFilesStorage(FileSystemStorage):
-         if not location:
-             self.location = settings.STATIC_ROOT
- 
-+    @cached_property
-+    def base_url(self):
-+        if self._base_url is not None and not self._base_url.endswith('/'):
-+            self._base_url += '/'
-+        return self._add_script_prefix(self._base_url)
-+
- 
- class HashedFilesMixin:
-     default_template = """url("%(url)s")"""
---- a/django/templatetags/static.py
-+++ b/django/templatetags/static.py
-@@ -67,6 +67,18 @@ class StaticNode(template.Node):
- 
- 
- def static(path):
--    return urljoin(getattr(settings, 'STATIC_URL', ''), quote(path))
-+    """
-+    Return a URL to a static file, respecting SCRIPT_NAME.
-+    """
-+    url = getattr(settings, 'STATIC_URL', '')
-+    # Only prepend script prefix for relative URLs (starting with / but not //)
-+    if url and url.startswith('/') and not url.startswith('//'):
-+        from django.urls import get_script_prefix
-+        prefix = get_script_prefix()
-+        if prefix != '/':
-+            url = prefix.rstrip('/') + url
-+    return urljoin(url, quote(path))
- 
- 
- @register.tag('static')

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/django__django-11583.patch

@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the Django issue and the stacktrace provided, I can create the fix. The issue is in `django/utils/autoreload.py` in the `iter_modules_and_files` function where `path.resolve().absolute()` is called. When pathlib encounters a null byte in a path during resolution, it throws a `ValueError: embedded null byte`. The fix is to catch this exception and continue processing other files.
-
-Looking at the stacktrace:
-- Line 132: `results.add(path.resolve().absolute())`
-
-The fix should wrap the `path.resolve().absolute()` call in a try-except block to catch `ValueError` (for embedded null byte errors).
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/utils/autoreload.py
-+++ b/django/utils/autoreload.py
-@@ -129,7 +129,10 @@ def iter_modules_and_files(modules, extra_files):
-             # The module could have been removed, don't fail loudly if this
-             # is the case.
-             continue
--        results.add(path.resolve().absolute())
-+        try:
-+            results.add(path.resolve().absolute())
-+        except ValueError as e:
-+            # The path contains a null character on resolution.
-+            continue
-     return frozenset(results)

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/django__django-11620.patch

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description and the hints provided, I have sufficient information to generate the patch. The issue clearly states:
-
-1. The `technical_404_response` view performs URL resolving which raises a new `Http404`
-2. Only `Resolver404` is caught, not `Http404`
-3. The solution is to catch `Http404` instead of `Resolver404` in `technical_404_response`
-
-Looking at typical Django structure and the issue hints, the fix involves changing the exception handling in `technical_404_response` to catch `Http404` instead of just `Resolver404`.
-
---- a/django/views/debug.py
-+++ b/django/views/debug.py
-@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ def technical_404_response(request, exception):
-             urlconf = getattr(request, 'urlconf', settings.ROOT_URLCONF)
-             if isinstance(urlconf, types.ModuleType):
-                 urlconf = urlconf.__name__
-             with builtin_str(googletrans.LANGUAGES):
-                 caller = get_caller(request)
-             try:
-                 match = resolve(request.path_info)
--            except Resolver404:
-+            except Http404:
-                 pass

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/django__django-11630.patch

@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
-Now I have a good understanding of the fix. Let me provide a cleaner, more properly formatted patch for this Django issue:
-
---- a/django/core/checks/model_checks.py
-+++ b/django/core/checks/model_checks.py
-@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ import operator
- from itertools import chain
- 
- from django.apps import apps
--from django.core.checks import Error, Tags, register
-+from django.conf import settings
-+from django.core.checks import Error, Tags, Warning, register
- 
- 
- @register(Tags.models)
-@@ -35,12 +36,23 @@ def check_all_models(app_configs=None, **kwargs):
-     for db_table, model_labels in db_table_models.items():
-         if len(model_labels) != 1:
--            errors.append(
--                Error(
--                    "db_table '%s' is used by multiple models: %s."
--                    % (db_table, ', '.join(db_table_models[db_table])),
--                    id='models.E028',
-+            model_labels_str = ', '.join(db_table_models[db_table])
-+            if settings.DATABASE_ROUTERS:
-+                errors.append(
-+                    Warning(
-+                        "db_table '%s' is used by multiple models: %s."
-+                        % (db_table, model_labels_str),
-+                        hint=(
-+                            "You have configured settings.DATABASE_ROUTERS. Verify "
-+                            "that %s are correctly routed to separate databases."
-+                        ) % model_labels_str,
-+                        id='models.W035',
-+                    )
-                 )
--            )
-+            else:
-+                errors.append(
-+                    Error(
-+                        "db_table '%s' is used by multiple models: %s."
-+                        % (db_table, model_labels_str),
-+                        id='models.E028',
-+                    )
-+                )
-     return errors