ostacky 0.6.0 → 0.6.2

package/assets/skills/graceful-degradation/SKILL.md

@@ -1,235 +1,235 @@
----
-name: graceful-degradation
-description: "Handle situations where multiple tools (CodeGraph, Engram MCP, Controller) are unavailable. Provides a systematic approach to continue working with reduced capabilities."
----
-
-# Graceful Degradation
-
-When critical tools are unavailable, this skill provides a systematic approach to continue working with reduced capabilities instead of failing completely.
-
-**Follow Core Instructions** — `ostacky.md` Core Instructions section for CodeGraph and Engram usage patterns.
-
-**IMPORTANT:** Engram is an **MCP server**, not a skill. Tools `mem_save`, `mem_search`, `mem_context` are MCP tools. Do NOT use `skill("engram")` — it doesn't exist.
-
----
-
-## Tool Availability Matrix
-
-| Tool | Type | Fallback Chain | Impact |
-|------|------|----------------|--------|
-| CodeGraph | MCP server | Engram → Read + Glob | No structural analysis, manual exploration |
-| Engram | MCP server | Continue without memory | No persistence across sessions |
-| Controller | MCP server | Inline validation + manual state | No state machine, no edit validation |
-| Context7 | MCP server (remote) | Skip documentation | No external API docs |
-
-## Detection
-
-After health check pre-vuelo, classify the situation:
-
-### All Tools Available
-Normal operation. No degradation needed.
-
-### Partial Degradation (1-2 tools down)
-Continue with available tools. Report to user.
-
-### Complete Degradation (All tools down)
-Switch to basic mode with manual workflows.
-
-## Degraded Workflows
-
-### Without CodeGraph
-
-**Available alternatives:**
-1. **Engram** — Check if previous analysis exists for the area
-2. **Read + Glob** — Manual file exploration
-
-**Workflow:**
-```
-1. mem_search for related analysis (if Engram available)
-2. Use Glob to find relevant files: **/*.ts, src/**/*.ts
-3. Read files manually to understand structure
-4. Proceed with caution — no blast radius analysis
-```
-
-**Limitations:**
-- No call path analysis
-- No blast radius calculation
-- No symbol search
-- Higher risk of missing dependencies
-
-### Without Engram
-
-**Available alternatives:**
-1. **OpenSpec** — Check for active changes with proposals/designs
-2. **Filesystem** — Check for previous analysis docs
-
-**Workflow:**
-```
-1. Check openspec/changes/ for active change artifacts
-2. Check docs/superpowers/specs/ for design documents
-3. Proceed without session memory
-4. At session end, document key decisions in a summary
-```
-
-**Limitations:**
-- No cross-session memory
-- No decision history
-- Risk of repeating previous mistakes
-
-### Without Controller
-
-**Available alternatives:**
-1. **Inline validation** — Manual edit validation
-2. **Manual state tracking** — Track progress in conversation
-
-**Workflow:**
-```
-1. For each edit:
-   - Read file fresh
-   - Verify oldString ≠ newString
-   - Verify oldString appears exactly once
-   - Execute edit
-2. Track completed tasks mentally or in conversation
-3. No automatic state persistence
-```
-
-**IMPORTANT — No check_pending_state:**
-When controller is unavailable, `check_pending_state` does NOT exist.
-- Do NOT try to call it — it will fail
-- The enforcement rule in Core Instructions applies ONLY when controller is available
-- In degraded mode, rely on the "Una pregunta por turno" rule directly
-
-**Limitations:**
-- No automatic edit validation
-- No task completion tracking
-- No state persistence across crashes
-- No pending state enforcement (check_pending_state unavailable)
-
-### Without Context7
-
-**Impact:** Minimal — only affects external API documentation lookups.
-
-**Workflow:** Proceed normally. Use existing knowledge.
-
-## Communication Protocol
-
-### Status Report Format
-
-When degradation is detected, report to user:
-
-```
-⚠️ [Tool] no disponible — usando fallback: [fallback]
-
-Herramientas disponibles:
-✅ [Tool1] — [status]
-❌ [Tool2] — [fallback being used]
-⚠️ [Tool3] — [degraded mode]
-
-¿Continuar con funcionalidad reducida?
-```
-
-### Example Reports
-
-**CodeGraph down:**
-```
-⚠️ CodeGraph no disponible — usando fallback: Engram → Read
-
-Herramientas disponibles:
-✅ Controller — ping OK
-❌ CodeGraph — timeout 10s
-✅ Engram — disponible
-✅ Context7 — disponible
-
-¿Continuar con lectura manual de archivos?
-```
-
-**All tools down:**
-```
-🔴 Stack de herramientas no disponible — modo básico activado
-
-Herramientas disponibles:
-❌ Controller — no responde
-❌ CodeGraph — no instalado
-❌ Engram — timeout 5s
-✅ Context7 — disponible (pero sin docs relevantes)
-
-Modo básico: sin validación de edits, sin memoria persistente, sin análisis estructural.
-¿Continuar o cancelar?
-```
-
-## Recovery After Degradation
-
-When a tool becomes available again during the session:
-
-1. **Detect:** Health check succeeds on next call
-2. **Report:** "✅ [Tool] disponible nuevamente"
-3. **Resume:** Switch back to normal workflow
-4. **Catch up:** Use the tool to verify recent work
-
-## Guardrails
-
-### During Degradation
-
-- **Never skip validation** — Use inline validation when controller is down
-- **Never assume structure** — Read files even if you think you know them
-- **Document decisions** — Write down key choices since Engram may be down
-- **Report limitations** — User must know what's working and what's not
-
-### When Choosing to Continue
-
-Ask yourself:
-1. Can I safely complete this task without the missing tool?
-2. What's the worst case if I proceed without it?
-3. Is the user aware of the limitations?
-
-If unsure → ask the user.
-
-### When to Stop
-
-- All critical tools are down AND the task requires them
-- The task is high-risk without structural analysis (CodeGraph)
-- The user requests to stop
-
-## Integration
-
-This skill is loaded automatically when the agent detects tool failures during the health check pre-vuelo.
-
-It does NOT replace other skills — it provides degraded workflows for them.
-
-## Examples
-
-### Example 1: CodeGraph fails, others work
-
-```
-Agent: ⚠️ CodeGraph no disponible (timeout 10s).
-
-Voy a usar Engram para buscar análisis previos y luego leer archivos manualmente.
-
-¿Continuar con esta aproximación?
-
-User: Sí
-
-Agent: [Uses mem_search to find related analysis]
-       [Uses Glob to find relevant files]
-       [Reads files manually]
-       [Proceeds with task]
-```
-
-### Example 2: Controller fails
-
-```
-Agent: ⚠️ Controller no disponible — operando con validación inline.
-
-Cada edit será validado manualmente:
-- oldString ≠ newString
-- oldString aparece exactamente una vez
-
-¿Continuar?
-
-User: Sí
-
-Agent: [Reads file fresh]
-       [Validates oldString manually]
-       [Executes edit]
-       [Reports completion]
-```
+---
+name: graceful-degradation
+description: "Handle situations where multiple tools (CodeGraph, Engram MCP, Controller) are unavailable. Provides a systematic approach to continue working with reduced capabilities."
+---
+
+# Graceful Degradation
+
+When critical tools are unavailable, this skill provides a systematic approach to continue working with reduced capabilities instead of failing completely.
+
+**Follow Core Instructions** — `ostacky.md` Core Instructions section for CodeGraph and Engram usage patterns.
+
+**IMPORTANT:** Engram is an **MCP server**, not a skill. Tools `mem_save`, `mem_search`, `mem_context` are MCP tools. Do NOT use `skill("engram")` — it doesn't exist.
+
+---
+
+## Tool Availability Matrix
+
+| Tool | Type | Fallback Chain | Impact |
+|------|------|----------------|--------|
+| CodeGraph | MCP server | Engram → Read + Glob | No structural analysis, manual exploration |
+| Engram | MCP server | Continue without memory | No persistence across sessions |
+| Controller | MCP server | Inline validation + manual state | No state machine, no edit validation |
+| Context7 | MCP server (remote) | Skip documentation | No external API docs |
+
+## Detection
+
+After health check pre-vuelo, classify the situation:
+
+### All Tools Available
+Normal operation. No degradation needed.
+
+### Partial Degradation (1-2 tools down)
+Continue with available tools. Report to user.
+
+### Complete Degradation (All tools down)
+Switch to basic mode with manual workflows.
+
+## Degraded Workflows
+
+### Without CodeGraph
+
+**Available alternatives:**
+1. **Engram** — Check if previous analysis exists for the area
+2. **Read + Glob** — Manual file exploration
+
+**Workflow:**
+```
+1. mem_search for related analysis (if Engram available)
+2. Use Glob to find relevant files: **/*.ts, src/**/*.ts
+3. Read files manually to understand structure
+4. Proceed with caution — no blast radius analysis
+```
+
+**Limitations:**
+- No call path analysis
+- No blast radius calculation
+- No symbol search
+- Higher risk of missing dependencies
+
+### Without Engram
+
+**Available alternatives:**
+1. **OpenSpec** — Check for active changes with proposals/designs
+2. **Filesystem** — Check for previous analysis docs
+
+**Workflow:**
+```
+1. Check openspec/changes/ for active change artifacts
+2. Check docs/superpowers/specs/ for design documents
+3. Proceed without session memory
+4. At session end, document key decisions in a summary
+```
+
+**Limitations:**
+- No cross-session memory
+- No decision history
+- Risk of repeating previous mistakes
+
+### Without Controller
+
+**Available alternatives:**
+1. **Inline validation** — Manual edit validation
+2. **Manual state tracking** — Track progress in conversation
+
+**Workflow:**
+```
+1. For each edit:
+   - Read file fresh
+   - Verify oldString ≠ newString
+   - Verify oldString appears exactly once
+   - Execute edit
+2. Track completed tasks mentally or in conversation
+3. No automatic state persistence
+```
+
+**IMPORTANT — No check_pending_state:**
+When controller is unavailable, `check_pending_state` does NOT exist.
+- Do NOT try to call it — it will fail
+- The enforcement rule in Core Instructions applies ONLY when controller is available
+- In degraded mode, rely on the "Una pregunta por turno" rule directly
+
+**Limitations:**
+- No automatic edit validation
+- No task completion tracking
+- No state persistence across crashes
+- No pending state enforcement (check_pending_state unavailable)
+
+### Without Context7
+
+**Impact:** Minimal — only affects external API documentation lookups.
+
+**Workflow:** Proceed normally. Use existing knowledge.
+
+## Communication Protocol
+
+### Status Report Format
+
+When degradation is detected, report to user:
+
+```
+⚠️ [Tool] no disponible — usando fallback: [fallback]
+
+Herramientas disponibles:
+✅ [Tool1] — [status]
+❌ [Tool2] — [fallback being used]
+⚠️ [Tool3] — [degraded mode]
+
+¿Continuar con funcionalidad reducida?
+```
+
+### Example Reports
+
+**CodeGraph down:**
+```
+⚠️ CodeGraph no disponible — usando fallback: Engram → Read
+
+Herramientas disponibles:
+✅ Controller — ping OK
+❌ CodeGraph — timeout 10s
+✅ Engram — disponible
+✅ Context7 — disponible
+
+¿Continuar con lectura manual de archivos?
+```
+
+**All tools down:**
+```
+🔴 Stack de herramientas no disponible — modo básico activado
+
+Herramientas disponibles:
+❌ Controller — no responde
+❌ CodeGraph — no instalado
+❌ Engram — timeout 5s
+✅ Context7 — disponible (pero sin docs relevantes)
+
+Modo básico: sin validación de edits, sin memoria persistente, sin análisis estructural.
+¿Continuar o cancelar?
+```
+
+## Recovery After Degradation
+
+When a tool becomes available again during the session:
+
+1. **Detect:** Health check succeeds on next call
+2. **Report:** "✅ [Tool] disponible nuevamente"
+3. **Resume:** Switch back to normal workflow
+4. **Catch up:** Use the tool to verify recent work
+
+## Guardrails
+
+### During Degradation
+
+- **Never skip validation** — Use inline validation when controller is down
+- **Never assume structure** — Read files even if you think you know them
+- **Document decisions** — Write down key choices since Engram may be down
+- **Report limitations** — User must know what's working and what's not
+
+### When Choosing to Continue
+
+Ask yourself:
+1. Can I safely complete this task without the missing tool?
+2. What's the worst case if I proceed without it?
+3. Is the user aware of the limitations?
+
+If unsure → ask the user.
+
+### When to Stop
+
+- All critical tools are down AND the task requires them
+- The task is high-risk without structural analysis (CodeGraph)
+- The user requests to stop
+
+## Integration
+
+This skill is loaded automatically when the agent detects tool failures during the health check pre-vuelo.
+
+It does NOT replace other skills — it provides degraded workflows for them.
+
+## Examples
+
+### Example 1: CodeGraph fails, others work
+
+```
+Agent: ⚠️ CodeGraph no disponible (timeout 10s).
+
+Voy a usar Engram para buscar análisis previos y luego leer archivos manualmente.
+
+¿Continuar con esta aproximación?
+
+User: Sí
+
+Agent: [Uses mem_search to find related analysis]
+       [Uses Glob to find relevant files]
+       [Reads files manually]
+       [Proceeds with task]
+```
+
+### Example 2: Controller fails
+
+```
+Agent: ⚠️ Controller no disponible — operando con validación inline.
+
+Cada edit será validado manualmente:
+- oldString ≠ newString
+- oldString aparece exactamente una vez
+
+¿Continuar?
+
+User: Sí
+
+Agent: [Reads file fresh]
+       [Validates oldString manually]
+       [Executes edit]
+       [Reports completion]
+```