openclaw-node-harness 2.0.0

package/skills/finance-metrics-quickref/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,309 @@
+---
+name: finance-metrics-quickref
+description: "Use when you need a quick formula, benchmark, or red-flag check for any SaaS finance metric. Covers 32+ metrics (ARPU, CAC, LTV, NRR, Rule of 40, etc.) with formulas, benchmarks, and decision frameworks."
+type: component
+triggers:
+  - "what's the formula for LTV"
+  - "SaaS metrics cheat sheet"
+  - "look up the benchmark for churn rate"
+  - "which finance metrics should I track"
+  - "quick reference for CAC payback"
+negative_triggers:
+  - "teach me SaaS finance from scratch"
+  - "build a financial model"
+  - "create a revenue forecast"
+---
+
+
+## Purpose
+
+Quick reference for any SaaS finance metric without deep teaching. Use this when you need a fast formula lookup, benchmark check, or decision framework reminder. For detailed explanations, calculations, and examples, see the related deep-dive skills.
+
+This is not a teaching tool—it's a cheat sheet optimized for speed. Scan, find, apply.
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+### Metric Categories
+
+Metrics are organized into four families:
+
+1. **Revenue & Growth** — Top-line money (revenue, ARPU, ARPA, MRR/ARR, churn, NRR, expansion)
+2. **Unit Economics** — Customer-level profitability (CAC, LTV, payback, margins)
+3. **Capital Efficiency** — Cash management (burn rate, runway, OpEx, net income)
+4. **Efficiency Ratios** — Growth vs. profitability balance (Rule of 40, magic number)
+
+### When to Use This Skill
+
+**Use this when:**
+- You need a quick formula or benchmark
+- You're preparing for a board meeting or investor call
+- You're evaluating a decision and need to check which metrics matter
+- You want to identify red flags quickly
+
+**Don't use this when:**
+- You need detailed calculation guidance (use `saas-revenue-growth-metrics` or `saas-economics-efficiency-metrics`)
+- You're learning these metrics for the first time (start with deep-dive skills)
+- You need examples and common pitfalls (covered in related skills)
+
+---
+
+## Application
+
+### All Metrics Reference Table
+
+| **Metric** | **Formula** | **What It Measures** | **Good Benchmark** | **Red Flag** |
+|------------|-------------|----------------------|-------------------|--------------|
+| **Revenue** | Total sales before expenses | Top-line money earned | Growth rate >20% YoY (varies by stage) | Revenue growing slower than costs |
+| **ARPU** | Total Revenue / Total Users | Revenue per individual user | Varies by model; track trend | ARPU declining cohort-over-cohort |
+| **ARPA** | MRR / Active Accounts | Revenue per customer account | SMB: $100-$1K; Mid: $1K-$10K; Ent: $10K+ | High ARPA + low ARPU (undermonetized seats) |
+| **ACV** | Annual Recurring Revenue per Contract | Annualized contract value | SMB: $5K-$25K; Mid: $25K-$100K; Ent: $100K+ | ACV declining (moving downmarket unintentionally) |
+| **MRR/ARR** | MRR × 12 = ARR | Predictable recurring revenue | Growth + quality matter; track components | New MRR declining while churn stable/growing |
+| **Churn Rate** | Customers Lost / Starting Customers | % of customers who cancel | Monthly <2% great, <5% ok; Annual <10% great | Churn increasing cohort-over-cohort |
+| **NRR** | (Start ARR + Expansion - Churn - Contraction) / Start ARR × 100 | Revenue retention + expansion | >120% excellent; 100-120% good; 90-100% ok | NRR <100% (base is contracting) |
+| **Expansion Revenue** | Upsells + Cross-sells + Usage Growth | Additional revenue from existing customers | 20-30% of total revenue | Expansion <10% of MRR |
+| **Quick Ratio** | (New MRR + Expansion MRR) / (Churned MRR + Contraction) | Revenue gains vs. losses | >4 excellent; 2-4 healthy; <2 leaky bucket | Quick Ratio <2 (leaky bucket) |
+| **Gross Margin** | (Revenue - COGS) / Revenue × 100 | % of revenue after direct costs | SaaS: 70-85% good; <60% concerning | Gross margin <60% or declining |
+| **CAC** | Total S&M Spend / New Customers | Cost to acquire one customer | Varies: Ent $10K+ ok; SMB <$500 | CAC increasing while LTV flat |
+| **LTV** | ARPU × Gross Margin % / Churn Rate | Total revenue from one customer | Must be 3x+ CAC; varies by segment | LTV declining cohort-over-cohort |
+| **LTV:CAC** | LTV / CAC | Unit economics efficiency | 3:1 healthy; <1:1 unsustainable; >5:1 underinvesting | LTV:CAC <1.5:1 |
+| **Payback Period** | CAC / (Monthly ARPU × Gross Margin %) | Months to recover CAC | <12 months great; 12-18 ok; >24 concerning | Payback >24 months (cash trap) |
+| **Contribution Margin** | (Revenue - All Variable Costs) / Revenue × 100 | True contribution after variable costs | 60-80% good for SaaS; <40% concerning | Contribution margin <40% |
+| **Burn Rate** | Monthly Cash Spent - Revenue | Cash consumed per month | Net burn <$200K manageable early; <$500K growth | Net burn accelerating |
+| **Runway** | Cash Balance / Monthly Net Burn | Months until money runs out | 12+ months good; 6-12 ok; <6 crisis | Runway <6 months |
+| **OpEx** | S&M + R&D + G&A | Costs to run the business | Should grow slower than revenue | OpEx growing faster than revenue |
+| **Net Income** | Revenue - All Expenses | Actual profit/loss | Early negative ok; mature 10-20%+ margin | Losses accelerating without growth |
+| **Rule of 40** | Revenue Growth % + Profit Margin % | Balance of growth vs. efficiency | >40 healthy; 25-40 ok; <25 concerning | Rule of 40 <25 |
+| **Magic Number** | (Q Revenue - Prev Q Revenue) × 4 / Prev Q S&M | S&M efficiency | >0.75 efficient; 0.5-0.75 ok; <0.5 fix GTM | Magic Number <0.5 |
+| **Operating Leverage** | Revenue Growth vs. OpEx Growth | Scaling efficiency | Revenue growth > OpEx growth | OpEx growing faster than revenue |
+| **Gross vs. Net Revenue** | Net = Gross - Discounts - Refunds - Credits | What you actually keep | Refunds <10%; discounts <20% | Refunds >10% (product problem) |
+| **Revenue Concentration** | Top N Customers / Total Revenue | Dependency on largest customers | Top customer <10%; Top 10 <40% | Top customer >25% (existential risk) |
+| **Revenue Mix** | Product/Segment Revenue / Total Revenue | Portfolio composition | No single product >60% ideal | Single product >80% (no diversification) |
+| **Cohort Analysis** | Group customers by join date; track behavior | Whether business improving or degrading | Recent cohorts same/better than old | Newer cohorts perform worse |
+| **CAC Payback by Channel** | CAC / Monthly Contribution (by channel) | Payback by acquisition channel | Compare across channels | One channel far worse than others |
+| **Gross Margin Payback** | CAC / (Monthly ARPU × Gross Margin %) | Payback using actual profit | Typically 1.5-2x simple payback | Payback using margin >36 months |
+| **Unit Economics** | Revenue per unit - Cost per unit | Profitability of each "unit" | Positive contribution required | Negative contribution margin |
+| **Segment Payback** | CAC / Monthly Contribution (by segment) | Payback by customer segment | Compare to allocate resources | One segment unprofitable |
+| **Incrementality** | Revenue caused by action - Baseline | True impact of marketing/promo | Measure with holdout tests | Celebrating revenue that would've happened anyway |
+| **Working Capital** | Cash timing between revenue and collection | Cash vs. revenue timing | Annual upfront > monthly billing | Long payment terms killing runway |
+
+---
+
+### Quick Decision Frameworks
+
+Use these frameworks to combine metrics for common PM decisions.
+
+#### Framework 1: Should We Build This Feature?
+
+**Ask:**
+1. **Revenue impact?** Direct (pricing, add-on) or indirect (retention, conversion)?
+2. **Margin impact?** What's the COGS? Does it dilute margins?
+3. **ROI?** Revenue impact / Development cost
+
+**Build if:**
+- ROI >3x in year one (direct monetization), OR
+- LTV impact >10x development cost (retention), OR
+- Strategic value overrides short-term ROI
+
+**Don't build if:**
+- Negative contribution margin even with optimistic adoption
+- Payback period exceeds average customer lifetime
+
+**Metrics to check:** Revenue, Gross Margin, LTV, Contribution Margin
+
+---
+
+#### Framework 2: Should We Scale This Acquisition Channel?
+
+**Ask:**
+1. **Unit economics?** CAC, LTV, LTV:CAC ratio
+2. **Cash efficiency?** Payback period
+3. **Customer quality?** Cohort retention, NRR by channel
+4. **Scalability?** Magic Number, addressable volume
+
+**Scale if:**
+- LTV:CAC >3:1 AND
+- Payback <18 months AND
+- Customer quality meets/beats other channels AND
+- Magic Number >0.75
+
+**Don't scale if:**
+- LTV:CAC <1.5:1 AND
+- No clear path to improvement
+
+**Metrics to check:** CAC, LTV, LTV:CAC, Payback Period, NRR, Magic Number
+
+---
+
+#### Framework 3: Should We Change Pricing?
+
+**Ask:**
+1. **ARPU/ARPA impact?** Will revenue per customer increase?
+2. **Conversion impact?** Help or hurt trial-to-paid conversion?
+3. **Churn impact?** Create churn risk or reduce it?
+4. **NRR impact?** Enable expansion or create contraction?
+
+**Implement if:**
+- Net revenue impact positive after churn risk
+- Can test with segment before broad rollout
+
+**Don't change if:**
+- High churn risk without offsetting expansion
+- Can't test hypothesis before committing
+
+**Metrics to check:** ARPU, ARPA, Churn Rate, NRR, CAC Payback
+
+---
+
+#### Framework 4: Is the Business Healthy?
+
+**Check by stage:**
+
+**Early Stage (Pre-$10M ARR):**
+- Growth Rate >50% YoY
+- LTV:CAC >3:1
+- Gross Margin >70%
+- Runway >12 months
+
+**Growth Stage ($10M-$50M ARR):**
+- Growth Rate >40% YoY
+- NRR >100%
+- Rule of 40 >40
+- Magic Number >0.75
+
+**Scale Stage ($50M+ ARR):**
+- Growth Rate >25% YoY
+- NRR >110%
+- Rule of 40 >40
+- Profit Margin >10%
+
+**Metrics to check:** Revenue Growth, NRR, LTV:CAC, Rule of 40, Magic Number, Gross Margin
+
+---
+
+### Red Flags by Category
+
+#### Revenue & Growth Red Flags
+| **Red Flag** | **What It Means** | **Action** |
+|--------------|-------------------|------------|
+| Churn increasing cohort-over-cohort | Product-market fit degrading | Stop scaling acquisition; fix retention first |
+| NRR <100% | Base is contracting | Fix expansion or reduce churn before scaling |
+| Revenue churn > logo churn | Losing big customers | Investigate why high-value customers leave |
+| Quick Ratio <2 | Leaky bucket (barely outpacing losses) | Fix retention before scaling acquisition |
+| Expansion revenue <10% of MRR | No upsell/cross-sell engine | Build expansion paths |
+| Revenue concentration >50% in top 10 customers | Existential dependency risk | Diversify customer base |
+
+#### Unit Economics Red Flags
+| **Red Flag** | **What It Means** | **Action** |
+|--------------|-------------------|------------|
+| LTV:CAC <1.5:1 | Buying revenue at a loss | Reduce CAC or increase LTV before scaling |
+| Payback >24 months | Cash trap (long cash recovery) | Negotiate annual upfront or reduce CAC |
+| Gross margin <60% | Low profitability per dollar | Increase prices or reduce COGS |
+| CAC increasing while LTV flat | Unit economics degrading | Optimize conversion or reduce sales cycle |
+| Contribution margin <40% | Unprofitable after variable costs | Cut variable costs or increase prices |
+
+#### Capital Efficiency Red Flags
+| **Red Flag** | **What It Means** | **Action** |
+|--------------|-------------------|------------|
+| Runway <6 months | Survival crisis | Raise capital immediately or cut burn |
+| Net burn accelerating without revenue growth | Burning faster without results | Cut costs or increase revenue urgency |
+| OpEx growing faster than revenue | Negative operating leverage | Freeze hiring; optimize spend |
+| Rule of 40 <25 | Burning cash without growth | Improve growth or cut to profitability |
+| Magic Number <0.5 | S&M engine broken | Fix GTM efficiency before scaling spend |
+
+---
+
+### When to Use Which Metric
+
+**Prioritizing features:**
+- Revenue impact → Revenue, ARPU, Expansion Revenue
+- Margin impact → Gross Margin, Contribution Margin
+- ROI → LTV impact, Development cost
+
+**Evaluating channels:**
+- Acquisition cost → CAC, CAC by Channel
+- Customer value → LTV, NRR by Channel
+- Payback → Payback Period, CAC Payback by Channel
+- Scalability → Magic Number
+
+**Pricing decisions:**
+- Monetization → ARPU, ARPA, ACV
+- Impact → Churn Rate, NRR, Expansion Revenue
+- Efficiency → CAC Payback (will pricing change affect it?)
+
+**Business health:**
+- Growth → Revenue Growth, MRR/ARR Growth
+- Retention → Churn Rate, NRR, Quick Ratio
+- Economics → LTV:CAC, Payback Period, Gross Margin
+- Efficiency → Rule of 40, Magic Number, Operating Leverage
+- Survival → Burn Rate, Runway
+
+**Board/investor reporting:**
+- Key metrics: ARR, Revenue Growth %, NRR, LTV:CAC, Rule of 40, Magic Number, Burn Rate, Runway
+- Stage-specific: Early stage emphasize growth + unit economics; Growth stage emphasize Rule of 40 + Magic Number; Scale stage emphasize profitability + efficiency
+
+---
+
+## Examples
+
+### Example 1: Feature Investment Sanity Check
+
+You are deciding whether to build a premium export feature.
+
+1. Use Framework 1 (Should We Build This Feature?)
+2. Pull baseline metrics: ARPU, Gross Margin, LTV, Contribution Margin
+3. Model optimistic, base, and downside adoption
+4. Reject if contribution margin turns negative in downside case
+
+Quick output:
+- Base case ROI: 3.8x
+- Contribution margin impact: +4 points
+- Decision: Build now, with a 90-day post-launch check on churn and expansion
+
+### Example 2: Channel Scale Decision
+
+Paid social is generating many signups but weak retention.
+
+1. Use Framework 2 (Should We Scale This Acquisition Channel?)
+2. Check CAC, LTV:CAC, Payback Period, and NRR by channel
+3. Compare against best-performing channel, not company average
+
+Quick output:
+- LTV:CAC: 1.6:1
+- Payback: 26 months
+- NRR: 88%
+- Decision: Do not scale; cap spend and run targeted optimization tests
+
+---
+
+## Common Pitfalls
+
+- Using blended company averages instead of cohort or channel-level metrics
+- Scaling acquisition when Quick Ratio is weak and retention is deteriorating
+- Treating high LTV:CAC as sufficient without checking payback and runway impact
+- Raising prices based on ARPU lift alone without modeling churn and contraction
+- Comparing benchmarks across mismatched company stages or business models
+- Tracking many metrics without a clear decision question
+
+---
+
+## References
+
+### Related Skills (Deep Dives)
+- `saas-revenue-growth-metrics` — Detailed guidance on revenue, retention, and growth metrics (13 metrics)
+- `saas-economics-efficiency-metrics` — Detailed guidance on unit economics and capital efficiency (17 metrics)
+- `feature-investment-advisor` — Uses these metrics to evaluate feature ROI
+- `acquisition-channel-advisor` — Uses these metrics to evaluate channel viability
+- `finance-based-pricing-advisor` — Uses these metrics to evaluate pricing changes
+- `business-health-diagnostic` — Uses these metrics to diagnose business health
+
+### External Resources
+- **Bessemer Venture Partners:** "SaaS Metrics 2.0" — Comprehensive SaaS benchmarking
+- **David Skok (Matrix Partners):** "SaaS Metrics" blog series — Deep dive on unit economics
+- **Tomasz Tunguz (Redpoint):** SaaS benchmarking research and blog
+- **ChartMogul, Baremetrics, ProfitWell:** SaaS analytics platforms with metric definitions
+- **SaaStr:** Annual SaaS benchmarking surveys
+
+### Provenance
+- Adapted from `research/finance/Finance_QuickRef.md`
+- Formulas from `research/finance/Finance for Product Managers.md`
+- Decision frameworks from `research/finance/Finance_For_PMs.Putting_It_Together_Synthesis.md`

package/skills/find-skills/.clawhub/origin.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "registry": "https://clawhub.ai",
+  "slug": "find-skills",
+  "installedVersion": "0.1.0",
+  "installedAt": 1770236413915
+}

package/skills/find-skills/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+---
+name: find-skills
+description: "Discover and install agent skills from the open ecosystem via the skills CLI. Use when the user asks how to do something that might exist as a skill, wants to search for tools/workflows, or wants to extend agent capabilities."
+triggers:
+  - "find a skill for"
+  - "is there a skill that can"
+  - "search for skills"
+  - "install a skill"
+  - "what skills are available"
+negative_triggers:
+  - "list my installed skills"
+  - "create a new skill from scratch"
+  - "uninstall a skill"
+---
+
+# Find Skills
+
+This skill helps you discover and install skills from the open agent skills ecosystem.
+
+## When to Use This Skill
+
+Use this skill when the user:
+
+- Asks "how do I do X" where X might be a common task with an existing skill
+- Says "find a skill for X" or "is there a skill for X"
+- Asks "can you do X" where X is a specialized capability
+- Expresses interest in extending agent capabilities
+- Wants to search for tools, templates, or workflows
+- Mentions they wish they had help with a specific domain (design, testing, deployment, etc.)
+
+## What is the Skills CLI?
+
+The Skills CLI (`npx skills`) is the package manager for the open agent skills ecosystem. Skills are modular packages that extend agent capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, and tools.
+
+**Key commands:**
+
+- `npx skills find [query]` - Search for skills interactively or by keyword
+- `npx skills add <package>` - Install a skill from GitHub or other sources
+- `npx skills check` - Check for skill updates
+- `npx skills update` - Update all installed skills
+
+**Browse skills at:** https://skills.sh/
+
+## How to Help Users Find Skills
+
+### Step 1: Understand What They Need
+
+When a user asks for help with something, identify:
+
+1. The domain (e.g., React, testing, design, deployment)
+2. The specific task (e.g., writing tests, creating animations, reviewing PRs)
+3. Whether this is a common enough task that a skill likely exists
+
+### Step 2: Search for Skills
+
+Run the find command with a relevant query:
+
+```bash
+npx skills find [query]
+```
+
+For example:
+
+- User asks "how do I make my React app faster?" → `npx skills find react performance`
+- User asks "can you help me with PR reviews?" → `npx skills find pr review`
+- User asks "I need to create a changelog" → `npx skills find changelog`
+
+The command will return results like:
+
+```
+Install with npx skills add <owner/repo@skill>
+
+vercel-labs/agent-skills@vercel-react-best-practices
+└ https://skills.sh/vercel-labs/agent-skills/vercel-react-best-practices
+```
+
+### Step 3: Present Options to the User
+
+When you find relevant skills, present them to the user with:
+
+1. The skill name and what it does
+2. The install command they can run
+3. A link to learn more at skills.sh
+
+Example response:
+
+```
+I found a skill that might help! The "vercel-react-best-practices" skill provides
+React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering.
+
+To install it:
+npx skills add vercel-labs/agent-skills@vercel-react-best-practices
+
+Learn more: https://skills.sh/vercel-labs/agent-skills/vercel-react-best-practices
+```
+
+### Step 4: Offer to Install
+
+If the user wants to proceed, you can install the skill for them:
+
+```bash
+npx skills add <owner/repo@skill> -g -y
+```
+
+The `-g` flag installs globally (user-level) and `-y` skips confirmation prompts.
+
+## Common Skill Categories
+
+When searching, consider these common categories:
+
+| Category        | Example Queries                          |
+| --------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
+| Web Development | react, nextjs, typescript, css, tailwind |
+| Testing         | testing, jest, playwright, e2e           |
+| DevOps          | deploy, docker, kubernetes, ci-cd        |
+| Documentation   | docs, readme, changelog, api-docs        |
+| Code Quality    | review, lint, refactor, best-practices   |
+| Design          | ui, ux, design-system, accessibility     |
+| Productivity    | workflow, automation, git                |
+
+## Tips for Effective Searches
+
+1. **Use specific keywords**: "react testing" is better than just "testing"
+2. **Try alternative terms**: If "deploy" doesn't work, try "deployment" or "ci-cd"
+3. **Check popular sources**: Many skills come from `vercel-labs/agent-skills` or `ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills`
+
+## When No Skills Are Found
+
+If no relevant skills exist:
+
+1. Acknowledge that no existing skill was found
+2. Offer to help with the task directly using your general capabilities
+3. Suggest the user could create their own skill with `npx skills init`
+
+Example:
+
+```
+I searched for skills related to "xyz" but didn't find any matches.
+I can still help you with this task directly! Would you like me to proceed?
+
+If this is something you do often, you could create your own skill:
+npx skills init my-xyz-skill
+```

package/skills/flavor-text-writer/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+---
+name: flavor-text-writer
+description: >
+  Flavor Text Writer — stub skill.
+  TODO: implement full skill definition.
+version: 0.1.0
+user-invocable: true
+metadata:
+  openclaw:
+    requires:
+      bins: []
+    os:
+      - macos
+      - linux
+---
+
+# Flavor Text Writer
+
+> **Status: stub** — This skill is referenced by the lore-writer soul but not yet implemented.
+
+## When to use
+
+(To be defined)
+
+## Commands
+
+(To be defined)

package/skills/founder-brief-summarizer/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+---
+name: founder-brief-summarizer
+description: "Produce founder-grade strategic takes on links, posts, threads, docs, and screenshots with signal/risk/action framing. Use when user asks for an opinion, a take, or a summary of shared links, articles, or social posts."
+triggers:
+  - "what do you think of this"
+  - "give me your take on"
+  - "summarize this article"
+  - "break down this thread"
+negative_triggers:
+  - "write a blog post"
+  - "do deep research on this topic"
+  - "translate this document"
+---
+
+# Founder Brief Summarizer
+
+Deliver fast, high-signal analysis in the user's style.
+
+## Output format
+
+Use this structure unless user asks otherwise:
+1. **Core claim** (1-2 lines)
+2. **What is true / useful**
+3. **What is weak / missing**
+4. **So what for us** (project-specific implication)
+5. **Recommended next move** (1-3 concrete actions)
+
+## Workflow
+
+1. Try direct fetch/extract first.
+2. If blocked (login wall/paywall/script wall):
+   - Request screenshot or pasted text immediately.
+   - Do not stall with repeated failing fetch attempts.
+3. Separate facts from interpretation.
+4. Give an opinion, not a neutral recap.
+5. Keep concise by default; expand only on request.
+
+## Quality bar
+
+- Avoid hype language.
+- Flag uncertainty explicitly.
+- Tie advice to active priorities (quality, novelty, speed, security).
+
+## Scripts
+
+- `scripts/brief_template.sh "<topic-or-link>"`
+  - Generates a consistent founder-brief scaffold for rapid analysis.
+
+## References
+
+- Use `references/response-templates.md` for short and long variants.
+- Use `references/validation-cases.md` for trigger/behavior smoke tests.

package/skills/founder-brief-summarizer/references/response-templates.md

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+# Response Templates
+
+## Short take (default)
+- Core claim:
+- Useful signal:
+- Weakness/risk:
+- Implication for us:
+- Next move:
+
+## Expanded take
+- Thesis
+- Evidence quality (strong/medium/weak)
+- Blind spots
+- Strategic implications (near-term / mid-term)
+- Action plan (today / this week)

package/skills/founder-brief-summarizer/references/validation-cases.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# Validation Cases
+
+## Trigger checks
+- "What do you think about this post?"
+- "Summarize this thread and give me your take"
+
+## Expected behavior
+- Produces opinionated founder-grade brief
+- Separates signal from hype
+- Gives concrete next moves
+- Requests screenshot/text quickly if link is blocked

package/skills/founder-brief-summarizer/scripts/brief_template.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+set -euo pipefail
+
+TOPIC="${1:-<topic-or-link>}"
+
+cat <<EOF
+# Founder Brief
+
+Topic: ${TOPIC}
+Generated: $(date)
+
+## Core claim
+- 
+
+## Useful signal
+- 
+
+## Weakness / missing
+- 
+
+## So what for us
+- 
+
+## Recommended next move
+1. 
+2. 
+3. 
+EOF

package/skills/frontend-design/.clawhub/origin.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "registry": "https://clawhub.ai",
+  "slug": "frontend-design",
+  "installedVersion": "1.0.0",
+  "installedAt": 1770237228815
+}