openads-ai 0.2.32 → 0.4.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +110 -20
- package/dist/cli.js +777 -54
- package/dist/doctor.js +39 -0
- package/dist/mcp-extension.js +19 -7
- package/dist/schedule.js +58 -5
- package/dist/setup.js +48 -8
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/skills/analytics/analytics.md +92 -22
- package/skills/automation/autoresearch-debug.md +41 -0
- package/skills/automation/autoresearch-evals.md +34 -0
- package/skills/automation/autoresearch-fix.md +40 -0
- package/skills/automation/autoresearch-improve.md +39 -0
- package/skills/automation/autoresearch-learn.md +31 -0
- package/skills/automation/autoresearch-plan.md +52 -0
- package/skills/automation/autoresearch-predict.md +32 -0
- package/skills/automation/autoresearch-probe.md +39 -0
- package/skills/automation/autoresearch-reason.md +37 -0
- package/skills/automation/autoresearch-scenario.md +43 -0
- package/skills/automation/autoresearch-security.md +43 -0
- package/skills/automation/autoresearch-ship.md +38 -0
- package/skills/automation/autoresearch.md +41 -54
- package/skills/express/analytics.md +23 -0
- package/skills/express/audit.md +28 -0
- package/skills/express/autoresearch.md +32 -0
- package/skills/express/copywriting.md +31 -0
- package/skills/express/cro.md +26 -0
- package/skills/express/product.md +11 -0
- package/skills/express/research.md +26 -0
- package/skills/express/strategy.md +28 -0
- package/skills/research/competitors.md +74 -33
- package/skills/research/customer-research.md +70 -22
|
@@ -1,54 +1,95 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: competitors
|
|
3
|
-
description: Analyze competitor positioning, ads, and messaging gaps.
|
|
3
|
+
description: Analyze competitor positioning, ads, and messaging gaps to find differentiation opportunities.
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
|
-
# Competitive Analysis
|
|
5
|
+
# Competitive Analysis Skill
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
7
|
## When to Use This Skill
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
|
-
Activate when the user
|
|
10
|
-
-
|
|
11
|
-
-
|
|
12
|
-
-
|
|
13
|
-
-
|
|
9
|
+
Activate when the user is:
|
|
10
|
+
- Asking about competitors, market positioning, or differentiation
|
|
11
|
+
- Writing copy that needs to stand out from alternatives
|
|
12
|
+
- Building a GTM strategy that requires competitive context
|
|
13
|
+
- Choosing messaging angles for a new campaign
|
|
14
14
|
|
|
15
|
-
Read `product-marketing.md` first.
|
|
15
|
+
Read `product-marketing.md` first to understand the user's product, ICP, and positioning.
|
|
16
16
|
|
|
17
17
|
---
|
|
18
18
|
|
|
19
|
-
##
|
|
19
|
+
## 5-Step Competitive Analysis Framework
|
|
20
20
|
|
|
21
|
-
### 1
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
- **
|
|
24
|
-
- **
|
|
25
|
-
- **
|
|
26
|
-
- **Emotional angle** — Fear, aspiration, urgency, curiosity?
|
|
21
|
+
### Step 1: Identify Competitors
|
|
22
|
+
Classify competitors into three tiers:
|
|
23
|
+
- **Direct**: Same product, same ICP (fight for the same budget)
|
|
24
|
+
- **Indirect**: Different product, same problem (alternative solutions)
|
|
25
|
+
- **Aspirational**: Industry leaders the user wants to differentiate from
|
|
27
26
|
|
|
28
|
-
### 2
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
- **
|
|
31
|
-
- **
|
|
32
|
-
- **
|
|
27
|
+
### Step 2: Analyze Their Messaging
|
|
28
|
+
For each competitor, extract:
|
|
29
|
+
- **Headline/Tagline**: What's their core claim?
|
|
30
|
+
- **ICP Signal**: Who are they targeting (job title, company size, pain point)?
|
|
31
|
+
- **Value Prop**: What do they claim to solve?
|
|
32
|
+
- **Proof Points**: Stats, testimonials, customer logos?
|
|
33
|
+
- **Tone**: Authoritative, playful, technical, accessible?
|
|
33
34
|
|
|
34
|
-
### 3
|
|
35
|
+
### Step 3: Map the Messaging Matrix
|
|
35
36
|
|
|
36
|
-
| |
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
|
37
|
+
| Competitor | Core Claim | ICP | Key Differentiator | Weakness |
|
|
38
|
+
|------------|------------|-----|--------------------|---------|
|
|
39
|
+
| [Name] | | | | |
|
|
40
|
+
| [Name] | | | | |
|
|
41
|
+
| [User's Product] | | | | |
|
|
40
42
|
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
43
|
+
### Step 4: Find Gaps
|
|
44
|
+
Look for positions that competitors are NOT owning:
|
|
45
|
+
- **Category gaps**: Is there a niche they're ignoring?
|
|
46
|
+
- **Message gaps**: Are they all saying the same thing? (undifferentiated market)
|
|
47
|
+
- **Proof gaps**: Do none of them have strong social proof?
|
|
48
|
+
- **Emotion gaps**: Are they all rational/feature-focused? Emotion could win.
|
|
49
|
+
- **ICP gaps**: A segment they're all under-serving?
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### Step 5: Recommend a Differentiation Angle
|
|
52
|
+
Based on the gap analysis, propose **3 concrete positioning angles** the user could own:
|
|
53
|
+
- What they should say
|
|
54
|
+
- Who they should target
|
|
55
|
+
- What proof point would make it credible
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
---
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
## Ad Copy Intelligence
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
When analyzing competitor ads:
|
|
62
|
+
- Look for recurring hooks — if everyone uses "Save time", avoid it
|
|
63
|
+
- Identify the emotional register: are they fear-based, aspiration-based, humor-based?
|
|
64
|
+
- Note what they're NOT saying (the gap is often the opportunity)
|
|
65
|
+
- Check landing pages: do their ads match their landing page? (message match = conversion lever)
|
|
42
66
|
|
|
43
67
|
---
|
|
44
68
|
|
|
45
69
|
## Output Format
|
|
46
70
|
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
71
|
+
```markdown
|
|
72
|
+
## Competitive Analysis: [User's Product] vs. Market
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
### Direct Competitors
|
|
75
|
+
| Competitor | Core Claim | ICP | Weakness |
|
|
76
|
+
|------------|------------|-----|---------|
|
|
77
|
+
| | | | |
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
### Market Messaging Map
|
|
80
|
+
**Overcrowded positions** (avoid these):
|
|
81
|
+
- [Position everyone owns]
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
**White space opportunities** (own these):
|
|
84
|
+
- [Unclaimed position]
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
### Recommended Differentiation Angles
|
|
87
|
+
1. **[Angle Name]** — [1-sentence pitch] — Best for: [campaign type]
|
|
88
|
+
2. **[Angle Name]** — [1-sentence pitch] — Best for: [campaign type]
|
|
89
|
+
3. **[Angle Name]** — [1-sentence pitch] — Best for: [campaign type]
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
### Immediate Copywriting Implications
|
|
92
|
+
- Use [specific language] instead of [competitor cliché]
|
|
93
|
+
- Lead with [proof type] since competitors lack it
|
|
94
|
+
- Target [underserved ICP segment]
|
|
54
95
|
```
|
|
@@ -22,15 +22,18 @@ Read `product-marketing.md` first to check if context already exists.
|
|
|
22
22
|
Ask: "When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]."
|
|
23
23
|
This reveals the real reason people buy — not the feature, but the progress they're trying to make.
|
|
24
24
|
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
25
|
+
Example:
|
|
26
|
+
> "When our Q3 pipeline is looking thin, I want to quickly launch targeted ads without needing our dev team, so I can generate demos before the board meeting."
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
### 2. Voice-of-Customer (VOC) Mining
|
|
26
29
|
Pull real language from:
|
|
27
|
-
- G2/Capterra reviews (yours and competitors)
|
|
28
|
-
- Reddit threads in your niche
|
|
30
|
+
- G2/Capterra reviews (yours and competitors) — the richest source
|
|
31
|
+
- Reddit threads in your niche (`r/marketing`, `r/entrepreneur`, `r/[industry]`)
|
|
29
32
|
- Support tickets and chat logs
|
|
30
33
|
- Sales call transcripts
|
|
31
34
|
- Amazon reviews for adjacent products
|
|
32
35
|
|
|
33
|
-
Use their exact words in ad copy. Customers describe problems better than marketers do.
|
|
36
|
+
> Use their exact words in ad copy. Customers describe problems better than marketers do.
|
|
34
37
|
|
|
35
38
|
### 3. The "Five Whys" for Pain Points
|
|
36
39
|
Start with the surface problem and ask "why?" five times to get to the emotional root:
|
|
@@ -40,24 +43,69 @@ Start with the surface problem and ask "why?" five times to get to the emotional
|
|
|
40
43
|
4. "We're targeting the wrong people" → Why?
|
|
41
44
|
5. "We don't actually know who our best customer is" ← This is the real problem.
|
|
42
45
|
|
|
46
|
+
### 4. Objection Mapping
|
|
47
|
+
For every objection, identify: the objection → its underlying fear → the proof that resolves it.
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
| Objection | Underlying Fear | Proof That Resolves It |
|
|
50
|
+
|-----------|----------------|----------------------|
|
|
51
|
+
| "It's too expensive" | Risk of wasted budget | ROI case study, free trial |
|
|
52
|
+
| "We're not ready" | Fear of disruption | "Works in 10 minutes" claim |
|
|
53
|
+
| "We already have a solution" | Switching cost fear | Migration support, comparison |
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
43
55
|
---
|
|
44
56
|
|
|
45
|
-
##
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
```
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
57
|
+
## ICP Persona Card
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
After gathering research, complete this persona card:
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
```
|
|
62
|
+
👤 ICP Persona: [Name/Title]
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
WHO THEY ARE:
|
|
65
|
+
- Job title:
|
|
66
|
+
- Company size:
|
|
67
|
+
- Industry:
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
THEIR SITUATION:
|
|
70
|
+
- What's happening in their business right now:
|
|
71
|
+
- What triggered them to start looking:
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
THEIR PAIN POINTS (in their own words):
|
|
74
|
+
1. "..."
|
|
75
|
+
2. "..."
|
|
76
|
+
3. "..."
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
THEIR OBJECTIONS:
|
|
79
|
+
1. "..." → Counter:
|
|
80
|
+
2. "..." → Counter:
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
THEIR BUYING TRIGGERS:
|
|
83
|
+
- Event 1:
|
|
84
|
+
- Event 2:
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
LANGUAGE THEY USE:
|
|
87
|
+
✅ Words/phrases that resonate:
|
|
88
|
+
❌ Jargon to avoid:
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
SUCCESS METRIC (how they know it worked):
|
|
91
|
+
```
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
---
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
## Copy Implications
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
At the end of every customer research session, translate findings directly into copy direction:
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
```markdown
|
|
100
|
+
### 🖊️ Ad Copy Implications
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
**Lead with**: [Specific pain point in their exact words]
|
|
103
|
+
**Prove with**: [Type of social proof that resolves their top objection]
|
|
104
|
+
**CTA should**: [Action that matches their buying trigger]
|
|
105
|
+
**Tone**: [Emotional register: urgent/aspirational/reassuring/playful]
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
**Headline angles to test**:
|
|
108
|
+
1. [Pain-led]: "[Pain point]?"
|
|
109
|
+
2. [Outcome-led]: "[Specific result] in [timeframe]"
|
|
110
|
+
3. [Social proof-led]: "[Number] [ICP job title]s already [outcome]"
|
|
63
111
|
```
|