olympus-ai 4.5.13 → 4.5.14
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/index.js +63 -27
- package/dist/cli/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/hooks/olympus-hooks.cjs +257 -257
- package/dist/installer/hooks.d.ts +47 -14
- package/dist/installer/hooks.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/installer/hooks.js +45 -77
- package/dist/installer/hooks.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/installer/index.d.ts +8 -7
- package/dist/installer/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/installer/index.js +49 -46
- package/dist/installer/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/resources/config/risk-keywords.json +5 -5
- package/resources/rules/common/ascii-diagram-standards.md +115 -115
- package/resources/rules/common/content-validation.md +131 -131
- package/resources/rules/common/error-handling.md +430 -430
- package/resources/rules/common/markdown-formatting.md +170 -170
- package/resources/rules/common/overconfidence-prevention.md +100 -100
- package/resources/rules/common/pathway-behaviors.json +60 -60
- package/resources/rules/common/pathway-behaviors.md +100 -100
- package/resources/rules/common/process-overview.md +157 -157
- package/resources/rules/common/terminal-formatting.md +161 -161
- package/resources/rules/common/terminology.md +189 -189
- package/resources/rules/common/welcome-message.md +118 -118
- package/resources/rules/common/workflow-changes.md +285 -285
- package/resources/rules/construction/bolt-planning.md +153 -153
- package/resources/rules/construction/bolt-review.md +143 -143
- package/resources/rules/construction/build-and-test.md +527 -527
- package/resources/rules/construction/code-generation.md +414 -414
- package/resources/rules/construction/documentation.md +201 -201
- package/resources/rules/construction/functional-design.md +135 -135
- package/resources/rules/construction/infrastructure-design.md +110 -110
- package/resources/rules/construction/nfr-design.md +106 -106
- package/resources/rules/construction/nfr-requirements.md +118 -118
- package/resources/rules/construction/test-generation.md +112 -112
- package/resources/rules/core-workflow.md +196 -196
- package/resources/rules/inception/application-design.md +195 -195
- package/resources/rules/inception/bolt-planning.md +588 -588
- package/resources/rules/inception/reverse-engineering.md +354 -354
- package/resources/rules/inception/units-generation.md +505 -505
- package/resources/rules/inception/user-stories.md +527 -527
- package/resources/rules/inception/workspace-detection.md +82 -82
- package/resources/rules/operations/operations.md +19 -19
- package/resources/skills/brief/templates/ai-dlc-intent-brief-template.md +149 -149
- package/resources/skills/getting-started/SKILL.md +79 -79
- package/resources/templates/construction/bolt-spec-template.md +270 -270
- package/resources/templates/inception/unit-brief-template.md +188 -188
- package/resources/templates/inception/units-template.md +99 -99
|
@@ -1,135 +1,135 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Functional Design
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## Purpose
|
|
4
|
-
**Detailed business logic design per unit**
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
Functional Design focuses on:
|
|
7
|
-
- Detailed business logic and algorithms for the unit
|
|
8
|
-
- Domain models with entities and relationships
|
|
9
|
-
- Detailed business rules, validation logic, and constraints
|
|
10
|
-
- Technology-agnostic design (no infrastructure concerns)
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
**Note**: This builds upon high-level component design from Application Design (INCEPTION phase)
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
## Prerequisites
|
|
15
|
-
- Units Generation must be complete
|
|
16
|
-
- Unit of work artifacts must be available
|
|
17
|
-
- Application Design recommended (provides high-level component structure)
|
|
18
|
-
- Execution plan must indicate Functional Design stage should execute
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
## Agent Delegation Strategy
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
**MANDATORY**: Delegate functional design artifact generation (Step 6) to `oracle-medium`. Do NOT generate business logic models and domain entities directly.
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
**Execution mode**: Foreground sequential — single coherent design reasoning task per unit.
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
**Delegation scope**:
|
|
27
|
-
- **Orchestrator retains**: Steps 1-5 (context analysis, plan creation, Q&A, answer collection) and Steps 7-9 (completion message, approval gate, state update).
|
|
28
|
-
- **Delegated to `oracle-medium`**: Step 6 (Generate Functional Design Artifacts) — the agent analyzes the unit definition, user answers, and prior context to produce business-logic-model.md, business-rules.md, domain-entities.md, and frontend-components.md (if applicable).
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
**If an agent task fails**: Follow the Agent Task Failure Recovery procedure in `error-handling.md` — retry the delegation, never silently do the work yourself.
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
**After agent completes**: The orchestrator compiles the agent's output into the artifact files, presents the completion message, and manages the approval gate.
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
## Overview
|
|
35
|
-
Design detailed business logic for the unit, technology-agnostic and focused purely on business functions.
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
## Steps to Execute
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
### Step 1: Analyze Unit Context
|
|
40
|
-
- Read unit definition from `aidlc-docs/inception/units/unit-of-work.md`
|
|
41
|
-
- Read assigned stories from `aidlc-docs/inception/units/unit-of-work-story-map.md`
|
|
42
|
-
- Understand unit responsibilities and boundaries
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
### Step 2: Create Functional Design Plan
|
|
45
|
-
- Generate plan with checkboxes [] for functional design
|
|
46
|
-
- Focus on business logic, domain models, business rules
|
|
47
|
-
- Each step should have a checkbox []
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
### Step 3: Generate Context-Appropriate Questions
|
|
50
|
-
**DIRECTIVE**: Thoroughly analyze the unit definition and functional design artifacts to identify ALL areas where clarification would improve the functional design. Be proactive in asking questions to ensure comprehensive understanding.
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
**CRITICAL**: Default to asking questions when there is ANY ambiguity or missing detail that could affect functional design quality. It's better to ask too many questions than to make incorrect assumptions.
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
- EMBED questions using [Answer]: tag format
|
|
55
|
-
- Focus on ANY ambiguities, missing information, or areas needing clarification
|
|
56
|
-
- Generate questions wherever user input would improve functional design decisions
|
|
57
|
-
- **When in doubt, ask the question** - overconfidence leads to poor designs
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
**Question categories to consider** (evaluate ALL categories):
|
|
60
|
-
- **Business Logic Modeling** - Ask about core entities, workflows, data transformations, and business processes
|
|
61
|
-
- **Domain Model** - Ask about domain concepts, entity relationships, data structures, and business objects
|
|
62
|
-
- **Business Rules** - Ask about decision rules, validation logic, constraints, and business policies
|
|
63
|
-
- **Data Flow** - Ask about data inputs, outputs, transformations, and persistence requirements
|
|
64
|
-
- **Integration Points** - Ask about external system interactions, APIs, and data exchange
|
|
65
|
-
- **Error Handling** - Ask about error scenarios, validation failures, and exception handling
|
|
66
|
-
- **Business Scenarios** - Ask about edge cases, alternative flows, and complex business situations
|
|
67
|
-
- **Frontend Components** (if applicable) - Ask about UI component structure, user interactions, state management, and form handling
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
### Step 4: Store Plan
|
|
70
|
-
- Save as `aidlc-docs/construction/plans/{unit-name}-functional-design-plan.md`
|
|
71
|
-
- Include all [Answer]: tags for user input
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
### Step 5: Collect and Analyze Answers
|
|
74
|
-
- Wait for user to complete all [Answer]: tags
|
|
75
|
-
- **MANDATORY**: Carefully review ALL responses for vague or ambiguous answers
|
|
76
|
-
- **CRITICAL**: Add follow-up questions for ANY unclear responses - do not proceed with ambiguity
|
|
77
|
-
- Look for responses like "depends", "maybe", "not sure", "mix of", "somewhere between"
|
|
78
|
-
- Create clarification questions file if ANY ambiguities are detected
|
|
79
|
-
- **Do not proceed until ALL ambiguities are resolved**
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
### Step 6: Generate Functional Design Artifacts
|
|
82
|
-
- Create `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/functional-design/business-logic-model.md`
|
|
83
|
-
- Create `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/functional-design/business-rules.md`
|
|
84
|
-
- Create `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/functional-design/domain-entities.md`
|
|
85
|
-
- If unit includes frontend/UI: Create `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/functional-design/frontend-components.md`
|
|
86
|
-
- Component hierarchy and structure
|
|
87
|
-
- Props and state definitions for each component
|
|
88
|
-
- User interaction flows
|
|
89
|
-
- Form validation rules
|
|
90
|
-
- API integration points (which backend endpoints each component uses)
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
### Step 7: Present Completion Message
|
|
93
|
-
- Present completion message in this structure:
|
|
94
|
-
1. **Completion Announcement** (mandatory): Always start with this:
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
```markdown
|
|
97
|
-
# 🔧 Functional Design Complete - [unit-name]
|
|
98
|
-
```
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
2. **AI Summary** (optional): Provide structured bullet-point summary of functional design
|
|
101
|
-
- Format: "Functional design has created [description]:"
|
|
102
|
-
- List key business logic models and entities (bullet points)
|
|
103
|
-
- List business rules and validation logic defined
|
|
104
|
-
- Mention domain model structure and relationships
|
|
105
|
-
- DO NOT include workflow instructions ("please review", "let me know", "proceed to next phase", "before we proceed")
|
|
106
|
-
- Keep factual and content-focused
|
|
107
|
-
3. **Formatted Workflow Message** (mandatory): Always end with this exact format:
|
|
108
|
-
|
|
109
|
-
```markdown
|
|
110
|
-
---
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
⚠️ **REVIEW REQUIRED**
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
114
|
-
> Please examine the functional design artifacts at:
|
|
115
|
-
> `aidlc-docs/{workflow-id}/construction/[unit-name]/functional-design/`
|
|
116
|
-
|
|
117
|
-
**You may:**
|
|
118
|
-
- 🔧 **Request Changes** — Ask for modifications to the functional design based on your review
|
|
119
|
-
- ✅ **Continue to Next Stage** — Approve functional design and proceed to **[next-stage-name]**
|
|
120
|
-
|
|
121
|
-
---
|
|
122
|
-
```
|
|
123
|
-
|
|
124
|
-
### Step 8: Wait for Explicit Approval
|
|
125
|
-
- Do not proceed until the user explicitly approves the functional design
|
|
126
|
-
- Approval must be clear and unambiguous
|
|
127
|
-
- If user requests changes, update the design and repeat the approval process
|
|
128
|
-
|
|
129
|
-
### Step 9: Record Approval and MANDATORY State Update
|
|
130
|
-
- Log approval in audit.md with timestamp
|
|
131
|
-
- Record the user's approval response with timestamp
|
|
132
|
-
- **MANDATORY**: Update BOTH state files in the SAME interaction:
|
|
133
|
-
1. Mark Functional Design stage complete in `aidlc-docs/{workflow-id}/aidlc-state.md`
|
|
134
|
-
2. Update `aidlc-docs/{workflow-id}/checkpoint.json` — set functional-design status to "completed" with completed_at timestamp
|
|
135
|
-
- **Do NOT proceed to the next stage without completing state updates**
|
|
1
|
+
# Functional Design
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Purpose
|
|
4
|
+
**Detailed business logic design per unit**
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Functional Design focuses on:
|
|
7
|
+
- Detailed business logic and algorithms for the unit
|
|
8
|
+
- Domain models with entities and relationships
|
|
9
|
+
- Detailed business rules, validation logic, and constraints
|
|
10
|
+
- Technology-agnostic design (no infrastructure concerns)
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
**Note**: This builds upon high-level component design from Application Design (INCEPTION phase)
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## Prerequisites
|
|
15
|
+
- Units Generation must be complete
|
|
16
|
+
- Unit of work artifacts must be available
|
|
17
|
+
- Application Design recommended (provides high-level component structure)
|
|
18
|
+
- Execution plan must indicate Functional Design stage should execute
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Agent Delegation Strategy
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
**MANDATORY**: Delegate functional design artifact generation (Step 6) to `oracle-medium`. Do NOT generate business logic models and domain entities directly.
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
**Execution mode**: Foreground sequential — single coherent design reasoning task per unit.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
**Delegation scope**:
|
|
27
|
+
- **Orchestrator retains**: Steps 1-5 (context analysis, plan creation, Q&A, answer collection) and Steps 7-9 (completion message, approval gate, state update).
|
|
28
|
+
- **Delegated to `oracle-medium`**: Step 6 (Generate Functional Design Artifacts) — the agent analyzes the unit definition, user answers, and prior context to produce business-logic-model.md, business-rules.md, domain-entities.md, and frontend-components.md (if applicable).
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
**If an agent task fails**: Follow the Agent Task Failure Recovery procedure in `error-handling.md` — retry the delegation, never silently do the work yourself.
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
**After agent completes**: The orchestrator compiles the agent's output into the artifact files, presents the completion message, and manages the approval gate.
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
## Overview
|
|
35
|
+
Design detailed business logic for the unit, technology-agnostic and focused purely on business functions.
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
## Steps to Execute
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
### Step 1: Analyze Unit Context
|
|
40
|
+
- Read unit definition from `aidlc-docs/inception/units/unit-of-work.md`
|
|
41
|
+
- Read assigned stories from `aidlc-docs/inception/units/unit-of-work-story-map.md`
|
|
42
|
+
- Understand unit responsibilities and boundaries
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
### Step 2: Create Functional Design Plan
|
|
45
|
+
- Generate plan with checkboxes [] for functional design
|
|
46
|
+
- Focus on business logic, domain models, business rules
|
|
47
|
+
- Each step should have a checkbox []
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
### Step 3: Generate Context-Appropriate Questions
|
|
50
|
+
**DIRECTIVE**: Thoroughly analyze the unit definition and functional design artifacts to identify ALL areas where clarification would improve the functional design. Be proactive in asking questions to ensure comprehensive understanding.
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
**CRITICAL**: Default to asking questions when there is ANY ambiguity or missing detail that could affect functional design quality. It's better to ask too many questions than to make incorrect assumptions.
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
- EMBED questions using [Answer]: tag format
|
|
55
|
+
- Focus on ANY ambiguities, missing information, or areas needing clarification
|
|
56
|
+
- Generate questions wherever user input would improve functional design decisions
|
|
57
|
+
- **When in doubt, ask the question** - overconfidence leads to poor designs
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
**Question categories to consider** (evaluate ALL categories):
|
|
60
|
+
- **Business Logic Modeling** - Ask about core entities, workflows, data transformations, and business processes
|
|
61
|
+
- **Domain Model** - Ask about domain concepts, entity relationships, data structures, and business objects
|
|
62
|
+
- **Business Rules** - Ask about decision rules, validation logic, constraints, and business policies
|
|
63
|
+
- **Data Flow** - Ask about data inputs, outputs, transformations, and persistence requirements
|
|
64
|
+
- **Integration Points** - Ask about external system interactions, APIs, and data exchange
|
|
65
|
+
- **Error Handling** - Ask about error scenarios, validation failures, and exception handling
|
|
66
|
+
- **Business Scenarios** - Ask about edge cases, alternative flows, and complex business situations
|
|
67
|
+
- **Frontend Components** (if applicable) - Ask about UI component structure, user interactions, state management, and form handling
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
### Step 4: Store Plan
|
|
70
|
+
- Save as `aidlc-docs/construction/plans/{unit-name}-functional-design-plan.md`
|
|
71
|
+
- Include all [Answer]: tags for user input
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
### Step 5: Collect and Analyze Answers
|
|
74
|
+
- Wait for user to complete all [Answer]: tags
|
|
75
|
+
- **MANDATORY**: Carefully review ALL responses for vague or ambiguous answers
|
|
76
|
+
- **CRITICAL**: Add follow-up questions for ANY unclear responses - do not proceed with ambiguity
|
|
77
|
+
- Look for responses like "depends", "maybe", "not sure", "mix of", "somewhere between"
|
|
78
|
+
- Create clarification questions file if ANY ambiguities are detected
|
|
79
|
+
- **Do not proceed until ALL ambiguities are resolved**
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
### Step 6: Generate Functional Design Artifacts
|
|
82
|
+
- Create `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/functional-design/business-logic-model.md`
|
|
83
|
+
- Create `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/functional-design/business-rules.md`
|
|
84
|
+
- Create `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/functional-design/domain-entities.md`
|
|
85
|
+
- If unit includes frontend/UI: Create `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/functional-design/frontend-components.md`
|
|
86
|
+
- Component hierarchy and structure
|
|
87
|
+
- Props and state definitions for each component
|
|
88
|
+
- User interaction flows
|
|
89
|
+
- Form validation rules
|
|
90
|
+
- API integration points (which backend endpoints each component uses)
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
### Step 7: Present Completion Message
|
|
93
|
+
- Present completion message in this structure:
|
|
94
|
+
1. **Completion Announcement** (mandatory): Always start with this:
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
```markdown
|
|
97
|
+
# 🔧 Functional Design Complete - [unit-name]
|
|
98
|
+
```
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
2. **AI Summary** (optional): Provide structured bullet-point summary of functional design
|
|
101
|
+
- Format: "Functional design has created [description]:"
|
|
102
|
+
- List key business logic models and entities (bullet points)
|
|
103
|
+
- List business rules and validation logic defined
|
|
104
|
+
- Mention domain model structure and relationships
|
|
105
|
+
- DO NOT include workflow instructions ("please review", "let me know", "proceed to next phase", "before we proceed")
|
|
106
|
+
- Keep factual and content-focused
|
|
107
|
+
3. **Formatted Workflow Message** (mandatory): Always end with this exact format:
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
```markdown
|
|
110
|
+
---
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
⚠️ **REVIEW REQUIRED**
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
> Please examine the functional design artifacts at:
|
|
115
|
+
> `aidlc-docs/{workflow-id}/construction/[unit-name]/functional-design/`
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
**You may:**
|
|
118
|
+
- 🔧 **Request Changes** — Ask for modifications to the functional design based on your review
|
|
119
|
+
- ✅ **Continue to Next Stage** — Approve functional design and proceed to **[next-stage-name]**
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
---
|
|
122
|
+
```
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
### Step 8: Wait for Explicit Approval
|
|
125
|
+
- Do not proceed until the user explicitly approves the functional design
|
|
126
|
+
- Approval must be clear and unambiguous
|
|
127
|
+
- If user requests changes, update the design and repeat the approval process
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
### Step 9: Record Approval and MANDATORY State Update
|
|
130
|
+
- Log approval in audit.md with timestamp
|
|
131
|
+
- Record the user's approval response with timestamp
|
|
132
|
+
- **MANDATORY**: Update BOTH state files in the SAME interaction:
|
|
133
|
+
1. Mark Functional Design stage complete in `aidlc-docs/{workflow-id}/aidlc-state.md`
|
|
134
|
+
2. Update `aidlc-docs/{workflow-id}/checkpoint.json` — set functional-design status to "completed" with completed_at timestamp
|
|
135
|
+
- **Do NOT proceed to the next stage without completing state updates**
|
|
@@ -1,110 +1,110 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Infrastructure Design
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## Prerequisites
|
|
4
|
-
- Functional Design must be complete for the unit
|
|
5
|
-
- NFR Design recommended (provides logical components to map)
|
|
6
|
-
- Execution plan must indicate Infrastructure Design stage should execute
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
## Agent Delegation Strategy
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
**MANDATORY**: Delegate infrastructure design artifact generation (Step 6) to `oracle-medium`. Do NOT generate infrastructure mappings and deployment architecture directly.
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
**Execution mode**: Foreground sequential — single coherent infrastructure design task per unit.
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
**Delegation scope**:
|
|
15
|
-
- **Orchestrator retains**: Steps 1-5 (analyze design artifacts, plan creation, Q&A, answer collection) and Steps 7-9 (completion message, approval gate, state update).
|
|
16
|
-
- **Delegated to `oracle-medium`**: Step 6 (Generate Infrastructure Design Artifacts) — the agent maps logical components to actual infrastructure services, producing infrastructure-design.md, deployment-architecture.md, and shared-infrastructure.md (if applicable).
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
**If an agent task fails**: Follow the Agent Task Failure Recovery procedure in `error-handling.md` — retry the delegation, never silently do the work yourself.
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
**After agent completes**: The orchestrator compiles the agent's output into the artifact files, presents the completion message, and manages the approval gate.
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
## Overview
|
|
23
|
-
Map logical software components to actual infrastructure choices for deployment environments.
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
## Steps to Execute
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
### Step 1: Analyze Design Artifacts
|
|
28
|
-
- Read functional design from `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/functional-design/`
|
|
29
|
-
- Read NFR design from `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/nfr-design/` (if exists)
|
|
30
|
-
- Identify logical components needing infrastructure
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
### Step 2: Create Infrastructure Design Plan
|
|
33
|
-
- Generate plan with checkboxes [] for infrastructure design
|
|
34
|
-
- Focus on mapping to actual services (AWS, Azure, GCP, on-premise)
|
|
35
|
-
- Each step should have a checkbox []
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
### Step 3: Generate Context-Appropriate Questions
|
|
38
|
-
**DIRECTIVE**: Analyze the functional and NFR design to generate ONLY questions relevant to THIS specific unit's infrastructure needs. Use the categories below as inspiration, NOT as a mandatory checklist. Skip entire categories if not applicable.
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
- EMBED questions using [Answer]: tag format
|
|
41
|
-
- Focus on ambiguities and missing information specific to this unit
|
|
42
|
-
- Generate questions only where user input is needed for infrastructure decisions
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
**Example question categories** (adapt as needed):
|
|
45
|
-
- **Deployment Environment** - Only if cloud provider or environment setup is unclear
|
|
46
|
-
- **Compute Infrastructure** - Only if compute service choice needs clarification
|
|
47
|
-
- **Storage Infrastructure** - Only if database or storage selection is ambiguous
|
|
48
|
-
- **Messaging Infrastructure** - Only if messaging/queuing services need specification
|
|
49
|
-
- **Networking Infrastructure** - Only if load balancing or API gateway approach is unclear
|
|
50
|
-
- **Monitoring Infrastructure** - Only if observability tooling needs clarification
|
|
51
|
-
- **Shared Infrastructure** - Only if infrastructure sharing strategy is ambiguous
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
### Step 4: Store Plan
|
|
54
|
-
- Save as `aidlc-docs/construction/plans/{unit-name}-infrastructure-design-plan.md`
|
|
55
|
-
- Include all [Answer]: tags for user input
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
### Step 5: Collect and Analyze Answers
|
|
58
|
-
- Wait for user to complete all [Answer]: tags
|
|
59
|
-
- Review for vague or ambiguous responses
|
|
60
|
-
- Add follow-up questions if needed
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
### Step 6: Generate Infrastructure Design Artifacts
|
|
63
|
-
- Create `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/infrastructure-design/infrastructure-design.md`
|
|
64
|
-
- Create `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/infrastructure-design/deployment-architecture.md`
|
|
65
|
-
- If shared infrastructure: Create `aidlc-docs/construction/shared-infrastructure.md`
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
### Step 7: Present Completion Message
|
|
68
|
-
- Present completion message in this structure:
|
|
69
|
-
1. **Completion Announcement** (mandatory): Always start with this:
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
```markdown
|
|
72
|
-
# 🏢 Infrastructure Design Complete - [unit-name]
|
|
73
|
-
```
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
2. **AI Summary** (optional): Provide structured bullet-point summary of infrastructure design
|
|
76
|
-
- Format: "Infrastructure design has mapped [description]:"
|
|
77
|
-
- List key infrastructure services and components (bullet points)
|
|
78
|
-
- List deployment architecture decisions and rationale
|
|
79
|
-
- Mention cloud provider choices and service mappings
|
|
80
|
-
- DO NOT include workflow instructions ("please review", "let me know", "proceed to next phase", "before we proceed")
|
|
81
|
-
- Keep factual and content-focused
|
|
82
|
-
3. **Formatted Workflow Message** (mandatory): Always end with this exact format:
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
```markdown
|
|
85
|
-
---
|
|
86
|
-
|
|
87
|
-
⚠️ **REVIEW REQUIRED**
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
> Please examine the infrastructure design at:
|
|
90
|
-
> `aidlc-docs/{workflow-id}/construction/[unit-name]/infrastructure-design/`
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
**You may:**
|
|
93
|
-
- 🔧 **Request Changes** — Ask for modifications to the infrastructure design based on your review
|
|
94
|
-
- ✅ **Continue to Next Stage** — Approve infrastructure design and proceed to **Code Generation**
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
---
|
|
97
|
-
```
|
|
98
|
-
|
|
99
|
-
### Step 8: Wait for Explicit Approval
|
|
100
|
-
- Do not proceed until the user explicitly approves the infrastructure design
|
|
101
|
-
- Approval must be clear and unambiguous
|
|
102
|
-
- If user requests changes, update the design and repeat the approval process
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
### Step 9: Record Approval and MANDATORY State Update
|
|
105
|
-
- Log approval in audit.md with timestamp
|
|
106
|
-
- Record the user's approval response with timestamp
|
|
107
|
-
- **MANDATORY**: Update BOTH state files in the SAME interaction:
|
|
108
|
-
1. Mark Infrastructure Design stage complete in `aidlc-docs/{workflow-id}/aidlc-state.md`
|
|
109
|
-
2. Update `aidlc-docs/{workflow-id}/checkpoint.json` — set infrastructure-design status to "completed" with completed_at timestamp
|
|
110
|
-
- **Do NOT proceed to the next stage without completing state updates**
|
|
1
|
+
# Infrastructure Design
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Prerequisites
|
|
4
|
+
- Functional Design must be complete for the unit
|
|
5
|
+
- NFR Design recommended (provides logical components to map)
|
|
6
|
+
- Execution plan must indicate Infrastructure Design stage should execute
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
## Agent Delegation Strategy
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
**MANDATORY**: Delegate infrastructure design artifact generation (Step 6) to `oracle-medium`. Do NOT generate infrastructure mappings and deployment architecture directly.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
**Execution mode**: Foreground sequential — single coherent infrastructure design task per unit.
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
**Delegation scope**:
|
|
15
|
+
- **Orchestrator retains**: Steps 1-5 (analyze design artifacts, plan creation, Q&A, answer collection) and Steps 7-9 (completion message, approval gate, state update).
|
|
16
|
+
- **Delegated to `oracle-medium`**: Step 6 (Generate Infrastructure Design Artifacts) — the agent maps logical components to actual infrastructure services, producing infrastructure-design.md, deployment-architecture.md, and shared-infrastructure.md (if applicable).
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
**If an agent task fails**: Follow the Agent Task Failure Recovery procedure in `error-handling.md` — retry the delegation, never silently do the work yourself.
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
**After agent completes**: The orchestrator compiles the agent's output into the artifact files, presents the completion message, and manages the approval gate.
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Overview
|
|
23
|
+
Map logical software components to actual infrastructure choices for deployment environments.
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
## Steps to Execute
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
### Step 1: Analyze Design Artifacts
|
|
28
|
+
- Read functional design from `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/functional-design/`
|
|
29
|
+
- Read NFR design from `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/nfr-design/` (if exists)
|
|
30
|
+
- Identify logical components needing infrastructure
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### Step 2: Create Infrastructure Design Plan
|
|
33
|
+
- Generate plan with checkboxes [] for infrastructure design
|
|
34
|
+
- Focus on mapping to actual services (AWS, Azure, GCP, on-premise)
|
|
35
|
+
- Each step should have a checkbox []
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
### Step 3: Generate Context-Appropriate Questions
|
|
38
|
+
**DIRECTIVE**: Analyze the functional and NFR design to generate ONLY questions relevant to THIS specific unit's infrastructure needs. Use the categories below as inspiration, NOT as a mandatory checklist. Skip entire categories if not applicable.
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
- EMBED questions using [Answer]: tag format
|
|
41
|
+
- Focus on ambiguities and missing information specific to this unit
|
|
42
|
+
- Generate questions only where user input is needed for infrastructure decisions
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
**Example question categories** (adapt as needed):
|
|
45
|
+
- **Deployment Environment** - Only if cloud provider or environment setup is unclear
|
|
46
|
+
- **Compute Infrastructure** - Only if compute service choice needs clarification
|
|
47
|
+
- **Storage Infrastructure** - Only if database or storage selection is ambiguous
|
|
48
|
+
- **Messaging Infrastructure** - Only if messaging/queuing services need specification
|
|
49
|
+
- **Networking Infrastructure** - Only if load balancing or API gateway approach is unclear
|
|
50
|
+
- **Monitoring Infrastructure** - Only if observability tooling needs clarification
|
|
51
|
+
- **Shared Infrastructure** - Only if infrastructure sharing strategy is ambiguous
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
### Step 4: Store Plan
|
|
54
|
+
- Save as `aidlc-docs/construction/plans/{unit-name}-infrastructure-design-plan.md`
|
|
55
|
+
- Include all [Answer]: tags for user input
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
### Step 5: Collect and Analyze Answers
|
|
58
|
+
- Wait for user to complete all [Answer]: tags
|
|
59
|
+
- Review for vague or ambiguous responses
|
|
60
|
+
- Add follow-up questions if needed
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
### Step 6: Generate Infrastructure Design Artifacts
|
|
63
|
+
- Create `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/infrastructure-design/infrastructure-design.md`
|
|
64
|
+
- Create `aidlc-docs/construction/{unit-name}/infrastructure-design/deployment-architecture.md`
|
|
65
|
+
- If shared infrastructure: Create `aidlc-docs/construction/shared-infrastructure.md`
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
### Step 7: Present Completion Message
|
|
68
|
+
- Present completion message in this structure:
|
|
69
|
+
1. **Completion Announcement** (mandatory): Always start with this:
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
```markdown
|
|
72
|
+
# 🏢 Infrastructure Design Complete - [unit-name]
|
|
73
|
+
```
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
2. **AI Summary** (optional): Provide structured bullet-point summary of infrastructure design
|
|
76
|
+
- Format: "Infrastructure design has mapped [description]:"
|
|
77
|
+
- List key infrastructure services and components (bullet points)
|
|
78
|
+
- List deployment architecture decisions and rationale
|
|
79
|
+
- Mention cloud provider choices and service mappings
|
|
80
|
+
- DO NOT include workflow instructions ("please review", "let me know", "proceed to next phase", "before we proceed")
|
|
81
|
+
- Keep factual and content-focused
|
|
82
|
+
3. **Formatted Workflow Message** (mandatory): Always end with this exact format:
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
```markdown
|
|
85
|
+
---
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
⚠️ **REVIEW REQUIRED**
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
> Please examine the infrastructure design at:
|
|
90
|
+
> `aidlc-docs/{workflow-id}/construction/[unit-name]/infrastructure-design/`
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
**You may:**
|
|
93
|
+
- 🔧 **Request Changes** — Ask for modifications to the infrastructure design based on your review
|
|
94
|
+
- ✅ **Continue to Next Stage** — Approve infrastructure design and proceed to **Code Generation**
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
---
|
|
97
|
+
```
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
### Step 8: Wait for Explicit Approval
|
|
100
|
+
- Do not proceed until the user explicitly approves the infrastructure design
|
|
101
|
+
- Approval must be clear and unambiguous
|
|
102
|
+
- If user requests changes, update the design and repeat the approval process
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
### Step 9: Record Approval and MANDATORY State Update
|
|
105
|
+
- Log approval in audit.md with timestamp
|
|
106
|
+
- Record the user's approval response with timestamp
|
|
107
|
+
- **MANDATORY**: Update BOTH state files in the SAME interaction:
|
|
108
|
+
1. Mark Infrastructure Design stage complete in `aidlc-docs/{workflow-id}/aidlc-state.md`
|
|
109
|
+
2. Update `aidlc-docs/{workflow-id}/checkpoint.json` — set infrastructure-design status to "completed" with completed_at timestamp
|
|
110
|
+
- **Do NOT proceed to the next stage without completing state updates**
|