olympus-ai 4.5.13 → 4.5.14
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/index.js +63 -27
- package/dist/cli/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/hooks/olympus-hooks.cjs +257 -257
- package/dist/installer/hooks.d.ts +47 -14
- package/dist/installer/hooks.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/installer/hooks.js +45 -77
- package/dist/installer/hooks.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/installer/index.d.ts +8 -7
- package/dist/installer/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/installer/index.js +49 -46
- package/dist/installer/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/resources/config/risk-keywords.json +5 -5
- package/resources/rules/common/ascii-diagram-standards.md +115 -115
- package/resources/rules/common/content-validation.md +131 -131
- package/resources/rules/common/error-handling.md +430 -430
- package/resources/rules/common/markdown-formatting.md +170 -170
- package/resources/rules/common/overconfidence-prevention.md +100 -100
- package/resources/rules/common/pathway-behaviors.json +60 -60
- package/resources/rules/common/pathway-behaviors.md +100 -100
- package/resources/rules/common/process-overview.md +157 -157
- package/resources/rules/common/terminal-formatting.md +161 -161
- package/resources/rules/common/terminology.md +189 -189
- package/resources/rules/common/welcome-message.md +118 -118
- package/resources/rules/common/workflow-changes.md +285 -285
- package/resources/rules/construction/bolt-planning.md +153 -153
- package/resources/rules/construction/bolt-review.md +143 -143
- package/resources/rules/construction/build-and-test.md +527 -527
- package/resources/rules/construction/code-generation.md +414 -414
- package/resources/rules/construction/documentation.md +201 -201
- package/resources/rules/construction/functional-design.md +135 -135
- package/resources/rules/construction/infrastructure-design.md +110 -110
- package/resources/rules/construction/nfr-design.md +106 -106
- package/resources/rules/construction/nfr-requirements.md +118 -118
- package/resources/rules/construction/test-generation.md +112 -112
- package/resources/rules/core-workflow.md +196 -196
- package/resources/rules/inception/application-design.md +195 -195
- package/resources/rules/inception/bolt-planning.md +588 -588
- package/resources/rules/inception/reverse-engineering.md +354 -354
- package/resources/rules/inception/units-generation.md +505 -505
- package/resources/rules/inception/user-stories.md +527 -527
- package/resources/rules/inception/workspace-detection.md +82 -82
- package/resources/rules/operations/operations.md +19 -19
- package/resources/skills/brief/templates/ai-dlc-intent-brief-template.md +149 -149
- package/resources/skills/getting-started/SKILL.md +79 -79
- package/resources/templates/construction/bolt-spec-template.md +270 -270
- package/resources/templates/inception/unit-brief-template.md +188 -188
- package/resources/templates/inception/units-template.md +99 -99
|
@@ -1,189 +1,189 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# AI-DLC Terminology Glossary
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## Core Terminology
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
### Phase vs Stage
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
**Phase**: One of the three high-level lifecycle phases in AI-DLC
|
|
8
|
-
- 🔵 **INCEPTION PHASE** - Planning & Architecture (WHAT and WHY)
|
|
9
|
-
- 🟢 **CONSTRUCTION PHASE** - Design, Implementation & Test (HOW)
|
|
10
|
-
- 🟡 **OPERATIONS PHASE** - Deployment & Monitoring (future expansion)
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
**Stage**: An individual workflow activity within a phase
|
|
13
|
-
- Examples: Context Assessment stage, Requirements Assessment stage, Code Planning stage
|
|
14
|
-
- Each stage has specific prerequisites, steps, and outputs
|
|
15
|
-
- Stages can be ALWAYS-EXECUTE or CONDITIONAL
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
**Usage Examples**:
|
|
18
|
-
- ✅ "The CONSTRUCTION phase contains 7 stages"
|
|
19
|
-
- ✅ "The Code Planning stage is always executed"
|
|
20
|
-
- ✅ "We're in the INCEPTION phase, executing the Requirements Assessment stage"
|
|
21
|
-
- ❌ "The Requirements Assessment phase" (should be "stage")
|
|
22
|
-
- ❌ "The CONSTRUCTION stage" (should be "phase")
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
## Three-Phase Lifecycle
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
### INCEPTION PHASE
|
|
27
|
-
**Purpose**: Planning and architectural decisions
|
|
28
|
-
**Focus**: Determine WHAT to build and WHY
|
|
29
|
-
**Location**: `inception/` directory
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
**Stages**:
|
|
32
|
-
- Workspace Detection (ALWAYS)
|
|
33
|
-
- Reverse Engineering (CONDITIONAL - Brownfield only)
|
|
34
|
-
- Requirements Analysis (ALWAYS - Adaptive depth)
|
|
35
|
-
- User Stories (CONDITIONAL)
|
|
36
|
-
- Workflow Planning (ALWAYS)
|
|
37
|
-
- Units Generation (CONDITIONAL)
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
**Outputs**: Requirements, user stories, architectural decisions, unit definitions
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
### CONSTRUCTION PHASE
|
|
42
|
-
**Purpose**: Detailed design and implementation
|
|
43
|
-
**Focus**: Determine HOW to build it
|
|
44
|
-
**Location**: `construction/` directory
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
**Stages**:
|
|
47
|
-
- Functional Design (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)
|
|
48
|
-
- NFR Requirements (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)
|
|
49
|
-
- NFR Design (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)
|
|
50
|
-
- Infrastructure Design (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)
|
|
51
|
-
- Code Planning (ALWAYS)
|
|
52
|
-
- Code Generation (ALWAYS)
|
|
53
|
-
- Build and Test (ALWAYS)
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
**Outputs**: Design artifacts, NFR implementations, code, tests
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
### OPERATIONS PHASE
|
|
58
|
-
**Purpose**: Deployment and operational readiness
|
|
59
|
-
**Focus**: How to DEPLOY and RUN it
|
|
60
|
-
**Location**: `operations/` directory
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
**Stages**:
|
|
63
|
-
- Operations (PLACEHOLDER)
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
**Outputs**: Build instructions, deployment guides, monitoring setup, verification procedures
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
---
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
## Workflow Stages
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
### Always-Execute Stages
|
|
72
|
-
- **Workspace Detection**: Initial analysis of workspace state and project type
|
|
73
|
-
- **Requirements Analysis**: Gathering requirements (depth varies based on complexity)
|
|
74
|
-
- **Workflow Planning**: Creating execution plan for which phases to run
|
|
75
|
-
- **Code Planning**: Creating detailed implementation plans for code generation
|
|
76
|
-
- **Code Generation**: Generating actual code based on plans and prior artifacts
|
|
77
|
-
- **Build and Test**: Building all units and executing comprehensive testing
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
### Conditional Stages
|
|
80
|
-
- **Reverse Engineering**: Analyzing existing codebase (brownfield projects only)
|
|
81
|
-
- **User Stories**: Creating user stories and personas (includes Story Planning and Story Generation)
|
|
82
|
-
- **Units Generation**: Decomposing the system into independent domain units
|
|
83
|
-
- **Functional Design**: Technology-agnostic business logic design (per-unit)
|
|
84
|
-
- **NFR Requirements**: Determining NFRs and selecting tech stack (per-unit)
|
|
85
|
-
- **NFR Design**: Incorporating NFR patterns and logical components (per-unit)
|
|
86
|
-
- **Infrastructure Design**: Mapping to actual infrastructure services (per-unit)
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
## Domain Design Terms
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
_Application Design stage was merged into Units Generation (INCEPTION phase)._
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
- **Component**: A functional unit with specific responsibilities
|
|
93
|
-
- **Method**: A function or operation within a component with defined business rules
|
|
94
|
-
- **Business Rule**: Logic that governs method behavior and validation
|
|
95
|
-
- **Service**: Orchestration layer that coordinates business logic across components
|
|
96
|
-
- **Component Dependency**: Relationship and communication pattern between components
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
## Architecture Terms (Infrastructure)
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
### Unit of Work
|
|
101
|
-
A logical grouping of user stories for development purposes. The term used during planning and decomposition.
|
|
102
|
-
|
|
103
|
-
**Usage**: "We need to decompose the system into units of work"
|
|
104
|
-
|
|
105
|
-
### Service
|
|
106
|
-
An independently deployable component in a microservices architecture. Each service is a separate unit of work.
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
**Usage**: "The Payment Service handles all payment processing"
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
### Module
|
|
111
|
-
A logical grouping of functionality within a single service or monolith. Modules are not independently deployable.
|
|
112
|
-
|
|
113
|
-
**Usage**: "The authentication module within the User Service"
|
|
114
|
-
|
|
115
|
-
### Component
|
|
116
|
-
A reusable building block within a service or module. Components are classes, functions, or packages that provide specific functionality.
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
**Usage**: "The EmailValidator component validates email addresses"
|
|
119
|
-
|
|
120
|
-
## Terminology Guidelines
|
|
121
|
-
|
|
122
|
-
### When to Use Each Term
|
|
123
|
-
|
|
124
|
-
**Unit of Work**:
|
|
125
|
-
- During Units Planning and Units Generation phases
|
|
126
|
-
- When discussing system decomposition
|
|
127
|
-
- In planning documents and discussions
|
|
128
|
-
- Example: "How should we decompose this into units of work?"
|
|
129
|
-
|
|
130
|
-
**Service**:
|
|
131
|
-
- When referring to independently deployable components
|
|
132
|
-
- In microservices architecture contexts
|
|
133
|
-
- In deployment and infrastructure discussions
|
|
134
|
-
- Example: "The Order Service will be deployed to ECS"
|
|
135
|
-
|
|
136
|
-
**Module**:
|
|
137
|
-
- When referring to logical groupings within a service
|
|
138
|
-
- In monolith architecture contexts
|
|
139
|
-
- When discussing internal organization
|
|
140
|
-
- Example: "The reporting module generates all reports"
|
|
141
|
-
|
|
142
|
-
**Component**:
|
|
143
|
-
- When referring to specific classes, functions, or packages
|
|
144
|
-
- In design and implementation discussions
|
|
145
|
-
- When discussing reusable building blocks
|
|
146
|
-
- Example: "The DatabaseConnection component manages connections"
|
|
147
|
-
|
|
148
|
-
## Stage Terminology
|
|
149
|
-
|
|
150
|
-
### Planning vs Generation
|
|
151
|
-
- **Planning**: Creating a plan with questions and checkboxes for execution
|
|
152
|
-
- **Generation**: Executing the plan to create artifacts
|
|
153
|
-
|
|
154
|
-
Examples:
|
|
155
|
-
- Story Planning → Story Generation
|
|
156
|
-
- Units Planning → Units Generation
|
|
157
|
-
- Unit Design Planning → Unit Design Generation
|
|
158
|
-
- NFR Planning → NFR Generation
|
|
159
|
-
- Code Planning → Code Generation
|
|
160
|
-
|
|
161
|
-
### Depth Levels
|
|
162
|
-
- **Minimal**: Quick, focused execution for simple changes
|
|
163
|
-
- **Standard**: Normal depth with standard artifacts for typical projects
|
|
164
|
-
- **Comprehensive**: Full depth with all artifacts for complex/high-risk projects
|
|
165
|
-
|
|
166
|
-
## Artifact Types
|
|
167
|
-
|
|
168
|
-
### Plans
|
|
169
|
-
Documents with checkboxes and questions that guide execution.
|
|
170
|
-
- Located in `aidlc-docs/plans/`
|
|
171
|
-
- Examples: `story-generation-plan.md`, `unit-of-work-plan.md`
|
|
172
|
-
|
|
173
|
-
### Artifacts
|
|
174
|
-
Generated outputs from executing plans.
|
|
175
|
-
- Located in various `aidlc-docs/` subdirectories
|
|
176
|
-
- Examples: `requirements.md`, `stories.md`, `design.md`
|
|
177
|
-
|
|
178
|
-
### State Files
|
|
179
|
-
Files tracking workflow progress and status.
|
|
180
|
-
- `aidlc-state.md`: Overall workflow state
|
|
181
|
-
- `audit.md`: Complete audit trail of all interactions
|
|
182
|
-
|
|
183
|
-
## Common Abbreviations
|
|
184
|
-
|
|
185
|
-
- **AI-DLC**: AI-Driven Development Life Cycle
|
|
186
|
-
- **NFR**: Non-Functional Requirements
|
|
187
|
-
- **UOW**: Unit of Work
|
|
188
|
-
- **API**: Application Programming Interface
|
|
189
|
-
- **CDK**: Cloud Development Kit (AWS)
|
|
1
|
+
# AI-DLC Terminology Glossary
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Core Terminology
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
### Phase vs Stage
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
**Phase**: One of the three high-level lifecycle phases in AI-DLC
|
|
8
|
+
- 🔵 **INCEPTION PHASE** - Planning & Architecture (WHAT and WHY)
|
|
9
|
+
- 🟢 **CONSTRUCTION PHASE** - Design, Implementation & Test (HOW)
|
|
10
|
+
- 🟡 **OPERATIONS PHASE** - Deployment & Monitoring (future expansion)
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
**Stage**: An individual workflow activity within a phase
|
|
13
|
+
- Examples: Context Assessment stage, Requirements Assessment stage, Code Planning stage
|
|
14
|
+
- Each stage has specific prerequisites, steps, and outputs
|
|
15
|
+
- Stages can be ALWAYS-EXECUTE or CONDITIONAL
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
**Usage Examples**:
|
|
18
|
+
- ✅ "The CONSTRUCTION phase contains 7 stages"
|
|
19
|
+
- ✅ "The Code Planning stage is always executed"
|
|
20
|
+
- ✅ "We're in the INCEPTION phase, executing the Requirements Assessment stage"
|
|
21
|
+
- ❌ "The Requirements Assessment phase" (should be "stage")
|
|
22
|
+
- ❌ "The CONSTRUCTION stage" (should be "phase")
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
## Three-Phase Lifecycle
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
### INCEPTION PHASE
|
|
27
|
+
**Purpose**: Planning and architectural decisions
|
|
28
|
+
**Focus**: Determine WHAT to build and WHY
|
|
29
|
+
**Location**: `inception/` directory
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
**Stages**:
|
|
32
|
+
- Workspace Detection (ALWAYS)
|
|
33
|
+
- Reverse Engineering (CONDITIONAL - Brownfield only)
|
|
34
|
+
- Requirements Analysis (ALWAYS - Adaptive depth)
|
|
35
|
+
- User Stories (CONDITIONAL)
|
|
36
|
+
- Workflow Planning (ALWAYS)
|
|
37
|
+
- Units Generation (CONDITIONAL)
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
**Outputs**: Requirements, user stories, architectural decisions, unit definitions
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
### CONSTRUCTION PHASE
|
|
42
|
+
**Purpose**: Detailed design and implementation
|
|
43
|
+
**Focus**: Determine HOW to build it
|
|
44
|
+
**Location**: `construction/` directory
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
**Stages**:
|
|
47
|
+
- Functional Design (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)
|
|
48
|
+
- NFR Requirements (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)
|
|
49
|
+
- NFR Design (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)
|
|
50
|
+
- Infrastructure Design (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)
|
|
51
|
+
- Code Planning (ALWAYS)
|
|
52
|
+
- Code Generation (ALWAYS)
|
|
53
|
+
- Build and Test (ALWAYS)
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
**Outputs**: Design artifacts, NFR implementations, code, tests
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
### OPERATIONS PHASE
|
|
58
|
+
**Purpose**: Deployment and operational readiness
|
|
59
|
+
**Focus**: How to DEPLOY and RUN it
|
|
60
|
+
**Location**: `operations/` directory
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
**Stages**:
|
|
63
|
+
- Operations (PLACEHOLDER)
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
**Outputs**: Build instructions, deployment guides, monitoring setup, verification procedures
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
---
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
## Workflow Stages
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
### Always-Execute Stages
|
|
72
|
+
- **Workspace Detection**: Initial analysis of workspace state and project type
|
|
73
|
+
- **Requirements Analysis**: Gathering requirements (depth varies based on complexity)
|
|
74
|
+
- **Workflow Planning**: Creating execution plan for which phases to run
|
|
75
|
+
- **Code Planning**: Creating detailed implementation plans for code generation
|
|
76
|
+
- **Code Generation**: Generating actual code based on plans and prior artifacts
|
|
77
|
+
- **Build and Test**: Building all units and executing comprehensive testing
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
### Conditional Stages
|
|
80
|
+
- **Reverse Engineering**: Analyzing existing codebase (brownfield projects only)
|
|
81
|
+
- **User Stories**: Creating user stories and personas (includes Story Planning and Story Generation)
|
|
82
|
+
- **Units Generation**: Decomposing the system into independent domain units
|
|
83
|
+
- **Functional Design**: Technology-agnostic business logic design (per-unit)
|
|
84
|
+
- **NFR Requirements**: Determining NFRs and selecting tech stack (per-unit)
|
|
85
|
+
- **NFR Design**: Incorporating NFR patterns and logical components (per-unit)
|
|
86
|
+
- **Infrastructure Design**: Mapping to actual infrastructure services (per-unit)
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
## Domain Design Terms
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
_Application Design stage was merged into Units Generation (INCEPTION phase)._
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
- **Component**: A functional unit with specific responsibilities
|
|
93
|
+
- **Method**: A function or operation within a component with defined business rules
|
|
94
|
+
- **Business Rule**: Logic that governs method behavior and validation
|
|
95
|
+
- **Service**: Orchestration layer that coordinates business logic across components
|
|
96
|
+
- **Component Dependency**: Relationship and communication pattern between components
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
## Architecture Terms (Infrastructure)
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
### Unit of Work
|
|
101
|
+
A logical grouping of user stories for development purposes. The term used during planning and decomposition.
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
**Usage**: "We need to decompose the system into units of work"
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
### Service
|
|
106
|
+
An independently deployable component in a microservices architecture. Each service is a separate unit of work.
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
**Usage**: "The Payment Service handles all payment processing"
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
### Module
|
|
111
|
+
A logical grouping of functionality within a single service or monolith. Modules are not independently deployable.
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
**Usage**: "The authentication module within the User Service"
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
### Component
|
|
116
|
+
A reusable building block within a service or module. Components are classes, functions, or packages that provide specific functionality.
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
**Usage**: "The EmailValidator component validates email addresses"
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
## Terminology Guidelines
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
### When to Use Each Term
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
**Unit of Work**:
|
|
125
|
+
- During Units Planning and Units Generation phases
|
|
126
|
+
- When discussing system decomposition
|
|
127
|
+
- In planning documents and discussions
|
|
128
|
+
- Example: "How should we decompose this into units of work?"
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
**Service**:
|
|
131
|
+
- When referring to independently deployable components
|
|
132
|
+
- In microservices architecture contexts
|
|
133
|
+
- In deployment and infrastructure discussions
|
|
134
|
+
- Example: "The Order Service will be deployed to ECS"
|
|
135
|
+
|
|
136
|
+
**Module**:
|
|
137
|
+
- When referring to logical groupings within a service
|
|
138
|
+
- In monolith architecture contexts
|
|
139
|
+
- When discussing internal organization
|
|
140
|
+
- Example: "The reporting module generates all reports"
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
**Component**:
|
|
143
|
+
- When referring to specific classes, functions, or packages
|
|
144
|
+
- In design and implementation discussions
|
|
145
|
+
- When discussing reusable building blocks
|
|
146
|
+
- Example: "The DatabaseConnection component manages connections"
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
## Stage Terminology
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
### Planning vs Generation
|
|
151
|
+
- **Planning**: Creating a plan with questions and checkboxes for execution
|
|
152
|
+
- **Generation**: Executing the plan to create artifacts
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
Examples:
|
|
155
|
+
- Story Planning → Story Generation
|
|
156
|
+
- Units Planning → Units Generation
|
|
157
|
+
- Unit Design Planning → Unit Design Generation
|
|
158
|
+
- NFR Planning → NFR Generation
|
|
159
|
+
- Code Planning → Code Generation
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
### Depth Levels
|
|
162
|
+
- **Minimal**: Quick, focused execution for simple changes
|
|
163
|
+
- **Standard**: Normal depth with standard artifacts for typical projects
|
|
164
|
+
- **Comprehensive**: Full depth with all artifacts for complex/high-risk projects
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
## Artifact Types
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
### Plans
|
|
169
|
+
Documents with checkboxes and questions that guide execution.
|
|
170
|
+
- Located in `aidlc-docs/plans/`
|
|
171
|
+
- Examples: `story-generation-plan.md`, `unit-of-work-plan.md`
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
173
|
+
### Artifacts
|
|
174
|
+
Generated outputs from executing plans.
|
|
175
|
+
- Located in various `aidlc-docs/` subdirectories
|
|
176
|
+
- Examples: `requirements.md`, `stories.md`, `design.md`
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
178
|
+
### State Files
|
|
179
|
+
Files tracking workflow progress and status.
|
|
180
|
+
- `aidlc-state.md`: Overall workflow state
|
|
181
|
+
- `audit.md`: Complete audit trail of all interactions
|
|
182
|
+
|
|
183
|
+
## Common Abbreviations
|
|
184
|
+
|
|
185
|
+
- **AI-DLC**: AI-Driven Development Life Cycle
|
|
186
|
+
- **NFR**: Non-Functional Requirements
|
|
187
|
+
- **UOW**: Unit of Work
|
|
188
|
+
- **API**: Application Programming Interface
|
|
189
|
+
- **CDK**: Cloud Development Kit (AWS)
|
|
@@ -1,118 +1,118 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# AI-DLC Welcome Message
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
**Purpose**: This file contains the user-facing welcome message that should be displayed ONCE at the start of any AI-DLC workflow.
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
---
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
# 👋 Welcome to AI-DLC (AI-Driven Development Life Cycle)! 👋
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
I'll guide you through an adaptive software development workflow that intelligently tailors itself to your specific needs.
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
## What is AI-DLC?
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
AI-DLC is a structured yet flexible software development process that adapts to your project's needs. Think of it as having an experienced software architect who:
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
- **Analyzes your requirements** and asks clarifying questions when needed
|
|
16
|
-
- **Plans the optimal approach** based on complexity and risk
|
|
17
|
-
- **Skips unnecessary steps** for simple changes while providing comprehensive coverage for complex projects
|
|
18
|
-
- **Documents everything** so you have a complete record of decisions and rationale
|
|
19
|
-
- **Guides you through each phase** with clear checkpoints and approval gates
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
## The Three-Phase Lifecycle
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
```
|
|
24
|
-
User Request
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
|
26
|
-
v
|
|
27
|
-
╔═══════════════════════════════════════╗
|
|
28
|
-
║ INCEPTION PHASE ║
|
|
29
|
-
║ Planning & Application Design ║
|
|
30
|
-
╠═══════════════════════════════════════╣
|
|
31
|
-
║ • Workspace Detection (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
32
|
-
║ • Reverse Engineering (COND) ║
|
|
33
|
-
║ • Requirements Analysis (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
34
|
-
║ • User Stories (CONDITIONAL) ║
|
|
35
|
-
║ • Workflow Planning (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
36
|
-
║ • Application Design (CONDITIONAL) ║
|
|
37
|
-
║ • Units Generation (CONDITIONAL) ║
|
|
38
|
-
╚═══════════════════════════════════════╝
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
|
40
|
-
v
|
|
41
|
-
╔═══════════════════════════════════════╗
|
|
42
|
-
║ CONSTRUCTION PHASE ║
|
|
43
|
-
║ Design, Implementation & Test ║
|
|
44
|
-
╠═══════════════════════════════════════╣
|
|
45
|
-
║ • Per-Unit Loop (for each unit): ║
|
|
46
|
-
║ - Functional Design (COND) ║
|
|
47
|
-
║ - NFR Requirements Assess (COND) ║
|
|
48
|
-
║ - NFR Design (COND) ║
|
|
49
|
-
║ - Infrastructure Design (COND) ║
|
|
50
|
-
║ - Unit → Bolt Decomposition ║
|
|
51
|
-
║ ║
|
|
52
|
-
║ • Per-Bolt Loop (for each bolt): ║
|
|
53
|
-
║ - Elaboration (COND) ║
|
|
54
|
-
║ - Code Generation (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
55
|
-
║ - Build and Test (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
56
|
-
║ - Review (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
57
|
-
║ ║
|
|
58
|
-
║ • Final Build and Test (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
59
|
-
╚═══════════════════════════════════════╝
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
|
61
|
-
v
|
|
62
|
-
╔═══════════════════════════════════════╗
|
|
63
|
-
║ OPERATIONS PHASE ║
|
|
64
|
-
║ Placeholder for Future ║
|
|
65
|
-
╠═══════════════════════════════════════╣
|
|
66
|
-
║ • Operations (PLACEHOLDER) ║
|
|
67
|
-
╚═══════════════════════════════════════╝
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
|
69
|
-
v
|
|
70
|
-
Complete
|
|
71
|
-
```
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
### Phase Breakdown:
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
**INCEPTION PHASE** - *Planning & Application Design*
|
|
76
|
-
- **Purpose**: Determines WHAT to build and WHY
|
|
77
|
-
- **Activities**: Understanding requirements, analyzing existing code (if any), planning the approach
|
|
78
|
-
- **Output**: Clear requirements, execution plan, decisions on the number of units of work for parallel development
|
|
79
|
-
- **Your Role**: Answer questions, review plans, approve direction
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
**CONSTRUCTION PHASE** - *Detailed Design, Implementation & Test*
|
|
82
|
-
- **Purpose**: Determines HOW to build it
|
|
83
|
-
- **Activities**: Detailed design (when needed), unit decomposition into bolts, per-bolt code generation and testing
|
|
84
|
-
- **Output**: Working code, tests, build instructions
|
|
85
|
-
- **Your Role**: Review designs, approve bolt plans, validate results
|
|
86
|
-
|
|
87
|
-
> **What is a Bolt?** A bolt is the smallest unit of execution in AI-DLC — a focused implementation task (typically hours of work, not days). Each unit of work is decomposed into one or more bolts, and each bolt goes through its own lifecycle: **Elaboration** (detailed spec) → **Code Generation** → **Build and Test** → **Review**. Simple bolts run in *express mode*, skipping elaboration for faster delivery.
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
**OPERATIONS PHASE** - *Deployment & Monitoring (Future)*
|
|
90
|
-
- **Purpose**: How to DEPLOY and RUN it
|
|
91
|
-
- **Status**: Placeholder for future deployment and monitoring workflows
|
|
92
|
-
- **Current State**: Build and test activities handled in CONSTRUCTION phase
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
## Key Principles:
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
- ⚡ **Fully Adaptive**: Each stage independently evaluated based on your needs
|
|
97
|
-
- 🎯 **Efficient**: Simple changes execute only essential stages
|
|
98
|
-
- 📋 **Comprehensive**: Complex changes get full treatment with all safeguards
|
|
99
|
-
- 🔍 **Transparent**: You see and approve the execution plan before work begins
|
|
100
|
-
- 📝 **Documented**: Complete audit trail of all decisions and changes
|
|
101
|
-
- 🎛️ **User Control**: You can request stages be included or excluded
|
|
102
|
-
|
|
103
|
-
## What Happens Next:
|
|
104
|
-
|
|
105
|
-
1. **I'll analyze your workspace** to understand if this is a new or existing project
|
|
106
|
-
2. **I'll gather requirements** and ask clarifying questions if needed
|
|
107
|
-
3. **I'll create an execution plan** showing which stages I propose to run and why
|
|
108
|
-
4. **You'll review and approve** the plan (or request changes)
|
|
109
|
-
5. **We'll execute the plan** with checkpoints at each major stage
|
|
110
|
-
6. **You'll get working code** with complete documentation and tests
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
The AI-DLC process adapts to:
|
|
113
|
-
- 📋 Your intent clarity and complexity
|
|
114
|
-
- 🔍 Existing codebase state
|
|
115
|
-
- 🎯 Scope and impact of changes
|
|
116
|
-
- ⚡ Risk and quality requirements
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
Let's begin!
|
|
1
|
+
# AI-DLC Welcome Message
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Purpose**: This file contains the user-facing welcome message that should be displayed ONCE at the start of any AI-DLC workflow.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
# 👋 Welcome to AI-DLC (AI-Driven Development Life Cycle)! 👋
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
I'll guide you through an adaptive software development workflow that intelligently tailors itself to your specific needs.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## What is AI-DLC?
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
AI-DLC is a structured yet flexible software development process that adapts to your project's needs. Think of it as having an experienced software architect who:
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
- **Analyzes your requirements** and asks clarifying questions when needed
|
|
16
|
+
- **Plans the optimal approach** based on complexity and risk
|
|
17
|
+
- **Skips unnecessary steps** for simple changes while providing comprehensive coverage for complex projects
|
|
18
|
+
- **Documents everything** so you have a complete record of decisions and rationale
|
|
19
|
+
- **Guides you through each phase** with clear checkpoints and approval gates
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## The Three-Phase Lifecycle
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
```
|
|
24
|
+
User Request
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
|
26
|
+
v
|
|
27
|
+
╔═══════════════════════════════════════╗
|
|
28
|
+
║ INCEPTION PHASE ║
|
|
29
|
+
║ Planning & Application Design ║
|
|
30
|
+
╠═══════════════════════════════════════╣
|
|
31
|
+
║ • Workspace Detection (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
32
|
+
║ • Reverse Engineering (COND) ║
|
|
33
|
+
║ • Requirements Analysis (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
34
|
+
║ • User Stories (CONDITIONAL) ║
|
|
35
|
+
║ • Workflow Planning (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
36
|
+
║ • Application Design (CONDITIONAL) ║
|
|
37
|
+
║ • Units Generation (CONDITIONAL) ║
|
|
38
|
+
╚═══════════════════════════════════════╝
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
|
40
|
+
v
|
|
41
|
+
╔═══════════════════════════════════════╗
|
|
42
|
+
║ CONSTRUCTION PHASE ║
|
|
43
|
+
║ Design, Implementation & Test ║
|
|
44
|
+
╠═══════════════════════════════════════╣
|
|
45
|
+
║ • Per-Unit Loop (for each unit): ║
|
|
46
|
+
║ - Functional Design (COND) ║
|
|
47
|
+
║ - NFR Requirements Assess (COND) ║
|
|
48
|
+
║ - NFR Design (COND) ║
|
|
49
|
+
║ - Infrastructure Design (COND) ║
|
|
50
|
+
║ - Unit → Bolt Decomposition ║
|
|
51
|
+
║ ║
|
|
52
|
+
║ • Per-Bolt Loop (for each bolt): ║
|
|
53
|
+
║ - Elaboration (COND) ║
|
|
54
|
+
║ - Code Generation (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
55
|
+
║ - Build and Test (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
56
|
+
║ - Review (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
57
|
+
║ ║
|
|
58
|
+
║ • Final Build and Test (ALWAYS) ║
|
|
59
|
+
╚═══════════════════════════════════════╝
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
|
61
|
+
v
|
|
62
|
+
╔═══════════════════════════════════════╗
|
|
63
|
+
║ OPERATIONS PHASE ║
|
|
64
|
+
║ Placeholder for Future ║
|
|
65
|
+
╠═══════════════════════════════════════╣
|
|
66
|
+
║ • Operations (PLACEHOLDER) ║
|
|
67
|
+
╚═══════════════════════════════════════╝
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
|
69
|
+
v
|
|
70
|
+
Complete
|
|
71
|
+
```
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
### Phase Breakdown:
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
**INCEPTION PHASE** - *Planning & Application Design*
|
|
76
|
+
- **Purpose**: Determines WHAT to build and WHY
|
|
77
|
+
- **Activities**: Understanding requirements, analyzing existing code (if any), planning the approach
|
|
78
|
+
- **Output**: Clear requirements, execution plan, decisions on the number of units of work for parallel development
|
|
79
|
+
- **Your Role**: Answer questions, review plans, approve direction
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
**CONSTRUCTION PHASE** - *Detailed Design, Implementation & Test*
|
|
82
|
+
- **Purpose**: Determines HOW to build it
|
|
83
|
+
- **Activities**: Detailed design (when needed), unit decomposition into bolts, per-bolt code generation and testing
|
|
84
|
+
- **Output**: Working code, tests, build instructions
|
|
85
|
+
- **Your Role**: Review designs, approve bolt plans, validate results
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
> **What is a Bolt?** A bolt is the smallest unit of execution in AI-DLC — a focused implementation task (typically hours of work, not days). Each unit of work is decomposed into one or more bolts, and each bolt goes through its own lifecycle: **Elaboration** (detailed spec) → **Code Generation** → **Build and Test** → **Review**. Simple bolts run in *express mode*, skipping elaboration for faster delivery.
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
**OPERATIONS PHASE** - *Deployment & Monitoring (Future)*
|
|
90
|
+
- **Purpose**: How to DEPLOY and RUN it
|
|
91
|
+
- **Status**: Placeholder for future deployment and monitoring workflows
|
|
92
|
+
- **Current State**: Build and test activities handled in CONSTRUCTION phase
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
## Key Principles:
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
- ⚡ **Fully Adaptive**: Each stage independently evaluated based on your needs
|
|
97
|
+
- 🎯 **Efficient**: Simple changes execute only essential stages
|
|
98
|
+
- 📋 **Comprehensive**: Complex changes get full treatment with all safeguards
|
|
99
|
+
- 🔍 **Transparent**: You see and approve the execution plan before work begins
|
|
100
|
+
- 📝 **Documented**: Complete audit trail of all decisions and changes
|
|
101
|
+
- 🎛️ **User Control**: You can request stages be included or excluded
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
## What Happens Next:
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
1. **I'll analyze your workspace** to understand if this is a new or existing project
|
|
106
|
+
2. **I'll gather requirements** and ask clarifying questions if needed
|
|
107
|
+
3. **I'll create an execution plan** showing which stages I propose to run and why
|
|
108
|
+
4. **You'll review and approve** the plan (or request changes)
|
|
109
|
+
5. **We'll execute the plan** with checkpoints at each major stage
|
|
110
|
+
6. **You'll get working code** with complete documentation and tests
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
The AI-DLC process adapts to:
|
|
113
|
+
- 📋 Your intent clarity and complexity
|
|
114
|
+
- 🔍 Existing codebase state
|
|
115
|
+
- 🎯 Scope and impact of changes
|
|
116
|
+
- ⚡ Risk and quality requirements
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
Let's begin!
|