oh-my-opencode 4.16.0 → 4.16.2

package/dist/features/background-agent/parent-wake-dedupe.d.ts

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ export type PendingParentWake = {
     promptContext: ParentWakePromptContext;
     notifications: string[];
     shouldReply: boolean;
+    queuedAt?: number;
     dispatchedAt?: number;
     noReplyAdmittedAt?: number;
     toolCallDeferralStartedAt?: number;

package/dist/features/background-agent/parent-wake-flush-runner.d.ts

@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ export declare class ParentWakeFlushRunner {
     private dropAdmittedWakeConsumedByParent;
     private sendParentWakePrompt;
     private isSessionActive;
+    private shouldForceDispatchAfterActiveDefer;
+    private getQueuedAgeMs;
     private hasRecentParentSessionActivity;
     private isUserMessageInProgress;
     private shouldDeferParentWakeForSessionHistory;

package/dist/features/background-agent/parent-wake-prompt-dispatch.d.ts

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ type ParentWakePromptDispatchInput = {
     readonly latestWake: PendingParentWake;
     readonly forceNoReply?: boolean;
     readonly retainPendingWake?: boolean;
+    readonly skipPromptGateStatusCheck?: boolean;
     readonly emptyAssistantTurnRetry: boolean;
     readonly toolWaitDecision: ToolWaitDeferralDecision;
     readonly getDispatchedWake: () => PendingParentWake | undefined;

package/dist/features/builtin-commands/templates/refactor-sections/intro-and-analysis.d.ts

@@ -1 +1 @@
-export declare const REFACTOR_INTRO_AND_ANALYSIS = "# Intelligent Refactor Command\n\n## Codex Harness Tool Compatibility\n\nThis command includes examples for the OpenCode harness. In Codex, do not call OpenCode-only tools such as `call_omo_agent(...)`, `task(...)`, `background_output(...)`, or `team_*(...)` literally. Translate those examples to Codex native tools:\n\n| OpenCode example | Codex tool to use |\n| --- | --- |\n| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type=\"explore\", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type=\"explorer\", task_name=\"...\", message=\"...\")` |\n| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type=\"librarian\", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type=\"librarian\", task_name=\"...\", message=\"...\")` |\n| `task(subagent_type=\"plan\", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type=\"plan\", task_name=\"...\", message=\"...\")` |\n| `task(subagent_type=\"oracle\", ...)` | `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({\"message\":\"TASK: act as a rigorous reviewer. ...\",\"agent_type\":\"lazycodex-gate-reviewer\",\"fork_context\":false})` |\n| `task(category=\"...\", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type=\"worker\", task_name=\"...\", message=\"...\")` |\n| `background_output(task_id=\"...\")` | `wait_agent(...)` to wait for subagent completion and mailbox updates |\n| `team_*(...)` | Use Codex native subagents plus `send_message`, `followup_task`, `wait_agent`, and `close_agent` |\n\nWhen translating `load_skills=[...]`, include the requested skill names in the spawned agent's `message`. If a code block below conflicts with this section, this section wins.\n\n## Usage\n```\n/refactor <refactoring-target> [--scope=<file|module|project>] [--strategy=<safe|aggressive>]\n\nArguments:\n  refactoring-target: What to refactor. Can be:\n    - File path: src/auth/handler.ts\n    - Symbol name: \"AuthService class\"\n    - Pattern: \"all functions using deprecated API\"\n    - Description: \"extract validation logic into separate module\"\n\nOptions:\n  --scope: Refactoring scope (default: module)\n    - file: Single file only\n    - module: Module/directory scope\n    - project: Entire codebase\n\n  --strategy: Risk tolerance (default: safe)\n    - safe: Conservative, maximum test coverage required\n    - aggressive: Allow broader changes with adequate coverage\n```\n\n## What This Command Does\n\nPerforms intelligent, deterministic refactoring with full codebase awareness. Unlike blind search-and-replace, this command:\n\n1. **Understands your intent** - Analyzes what you actually want to achieve\n2. **Maps the codebase** - Builds a definitive codemap before touching anything\n3. **Assesses risk** - Evaluates test coverage and determines verification strategy\n4. **Plans meticulously** - Creates a detailed plan with Plan agent\n5. **Executes precisely** - Step-by-step refactoring with LSP and AST-grep\n6. **Verifies constantly** - Runs tests after each change to ensure zero regression\n\n---\n\n# PHASE 0: INTENT GATE (MANDATORY FIRST STEP)\n\n**BEFORE ANY ACTION, classify and validate the request.**\n\n## Step 0.1: Parse Request Type\n\n| Signal | Classification | Action |\n|--------|----------------|--------|\n| Specific file/symbol | Explicit | Proceed to codebase analysis |\n| \"Refactor X to Y\" | Clear transformation | Proceed to codebase analysis |\n| \"Improve\", \"Clean up\" | Open-ended | **MUST ask**: \"What specific improvement?\" |\n| Ambiguous scope | Uncertain | **MUST ask**: \"Which modules/files?\" |\n| Missing context | Incomplete | **MUST ask**: \"What's the desired outcome?\" |\n\n## Step 0.2: Validate Understanding\n\nBefore proceeding, confirm:\n- [ ] Target is clearly identified\n- [ ] Desired outcome is understood\n- [ ] Scope is defined (file/module/project)\n- [ ] Success criteria can be articulated\n\n**If ANY of above is unclear, ASK CLARIFYING QUESTION:**\n\n```\nI want to make sure I understand the refactoring goal correctly.\n\n**What I understood**: [interpretation]\n**What I'm unsure about**: [specific ambiguity]\n\nOptions I see:\n1. [Option A] - [implications]\n2. [Option B] - [implications]\n\n**My recommendation**: [suggestion with reasoning]\n\nShould I proceed with [recommendation], or would you prefer differently?\n```\n\n## Step 0.3: Create Initial Todos\n\n**IMMEDIATELY after understanding the request, create todos:**\n\n```\nTodoWrite([\n  {\"id\": \"phase-1\", \"content\": \"PHASE 1: Codebase Analysis - launch parallel explore agents\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-2\", \"content\": \"PHASE 2: Build Codemap - map dependencies and impact zones\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-3\", \"content\": \"PHASE 3: Test Assessment - analyze test coverage and verification strategy\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-4\", \"content\": \"PHASE 4: Plan Generation - invoke Plan agent for detailed refactoring plan\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-5\", \"content\": \"PHASE 5: Execute Refactoring - step-by-step with continuous verification\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-6\", \"content\": \"PHASE 6: Final Verification - full test suite and regression check\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"}\n])\n```\n\n---\n\n# PHASE 1: CODEBASE ANALYSIS (PARALLEL EXPLORATION)\n\n**Mark phase-1 as in_progress.**\n\n## 1.1: Launch Parallel Explore Agents (BACKGROUND)\n\nFire ALL of these simultaneously using `call_omo_agent`:\n\n```\n// Agent 1: Find the refactoring target\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find all occurrences and definitions of [TARGET]. \n  Report: file paths, line numbers, usage patterns.\"\n)\n\n// Agent 2: Find related code\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\", \n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find all code that imports, uses, or depends on [TARGET].\n  Report: dependency chains, import graphs.\"\n)\n\n// Agent 3: Find similar patterns\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find similar code patterns to [TARGET] in the codebase.\n  Report: analogous implementations, established conventions.\"\n)\n\n// Agent 4: Find tests\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find all test files related to [TARGET].\n  Report: test file paths, test case names, coverage indicators.\"\n)\n\n// Agent 5: Architecture context\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find architectural patterns and module organization around [TARGET].\n  Report: module boundaries, layer structure, design patterns in use.\"\n)\n```\n\n## 1.2: Direct Tool Exploration (WHILE AGENTS RUN)\n\nWhile background agents are running, use direct tools:\n\n### LSP Tools for Precise Analysis:\n\n```typescript\n// Find definition(s)\nLspGotoDefinition(filePath, line, character)  // Where is it defined?\n\n// Find ALL usages across workspace\nLspFindReferences(filePath, line, character, includeDeclaration=true)\n\n// Get file structure\nLspDocumentSymbols(filePath)  // Hierarchical outline\nLspWorkspaceSymbols(filePath, query=\"[target_symbol]\")  // Search by name\n\n// Get current diagnostics\nlsp_diagnostics(filePath)  // Errors, warnings before we start\n```\n\n### AST-Grep Skill for Pattern Analysis:\n\n```bash\n// Find structural patterns\npython3 scripts/ast_grep_helper.py search 'function $NAME($$$) { $$$ }' --lang ts src/\n\n# Preview refactoring first\nsg --pattern '[old_pattern]' --rewrite '[new_pattern]' --lang ts src/\n```\n\n### Grep for Text Patterns:\n\n```\ngrep(pattern=\"[search_term]\", path=\"src/\", include=\"*.ts\")\n```\n\n## 1.3: Collect Background Results\n\n```\nbackground_output(task_id=\"[agent_1_id]\")\nbackground_output(task_id=\"[agent_2_id]\")\n...\n```\n\n**Mark phase-1 as completed after all results collected.**\n\n---\n\n";
+export declare const REFACTOR_INTRO_AND_ANALYSIS = "# Intelligent Refactor Command\n\n## Codex Harness Tool Compatibility\n\nThis command includes examples for the OpenCode harness. In Codex, do not call OpenCode-only tools such as `call_omo_agent(...)`, `task(...)`, `background_output(...)`, or `team_*(...)` literally. Translate those examples to Codex native tools:\n\n| OpenCode example | Codex tool to use |\n| --- | --- |\n| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type=\"explore\", ...)` | `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({\"message\":\"TASK: act as an explorer. ...\",\"agent_type\":\"explorer\",\"fork_context\":false})` |\n| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type=\"librarian\", ...)` | `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({\"message\":\"TASK: act as a librarian. ...\",\"agent_type\":\"librarian\",\"fork_context\":false})` |\n| `task(subagent_type=\"plan\", ...)` | `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({\"message\":\"TASK: act as a planning agent. ...\",\"agent_type\":\"plan\",\"fork_context\":false})` |\n| `task(subagent_type=\"oracle\", ...)` | `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({\"message\":\"TASK: act as a rigorous reviewer. ...\",\"agent_type\":\"lazycodex-gate-reviewer\",\"fork_context\":false})` |\n| `task(category=\"...\", ...)` | `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({\"message\":\"TASK: act as an implementation or QA worker. ...\",\"fork_context\":false})` |\n| `background_output(task_id=\"...\")` | `multi_agent_v1.wait_agent(...)` for mailbox signals |\n| `team_*(...)` | Use Codex native subagents via `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent`, `multi_agent_v1.send_input`, `multi_agent_v1.wait_agent`, and `multi_agent_v1.close_agent` |\n\nCodex exposes ONE of two subagent tool surfaces per session; check your own tool list and route accordingly. If `multi_agent_v1.*` tools exist, use the table above as written. If instead a flat `spawn_agent` with a required `task_name` exists (`multi_agent_v2`), rewrite every `multi_agent_v1.*` example: `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({...,\"fork_context\":false})` becomes `spawn_agent({\"task_name\":\"<lowercase_digits_underscores>\",\"message\":...,\"agent_type\":...,\"fork_turns\":\"none\"})` (`\"all\"` only when full parent history is truly required); `send_input` becomes `send_message`; do not call `close_agent`/`resume_agent` (finished agents end on their own; `followup_task` re-tasks one, `interrupt_agent` stops one); `wait_agent` takes only `timeout_ms` and returns on any child mailbox activity. `agent_type` works the same on both surfaces. If a code block below conflicts with this section, this section wins.\n\nWhen translating `load_skills=[...]`, include the requested skill names in the spawned agent's `message`. If a code block below conflicts with this section, this section wins.\n\n## Usage\n```\n/refactor <refactoring-target> [--scope=<file|module|project>] [--strategy=<safe|aggressive>]\n\nArguments:\n  refactoring-target: What to refactor. Can be:\n    - File path: src/auth/handler.ts\n    - Symbol name: \"AuthService class\"\n    - Pattern: \"all functions using deprecated API\"\n    - Description: \"extract validation logic into separate module\"\n\nOptions:\n  --scope: Refactoring scope (default: module)\n    - file: Single file only\n    - module: Module/directory scope\n    - project: Entire codebase\n\n  --strategy: Risk tolerance (default: safe)\n    - safe: Conservative, maximum test coverage required\n    - aggressive: Allow broader changes with adequate coverage\n```\n\n## What This Command Does\n\nPerforms intelligent, deterministic refactoring with full codebase awareness. Unlike blind search-and-replace, this command:\n\n1. **Understands your intent** - Analyzes what you actually want to achieve\n2. **Maps the codebase** - Builds a definitive codemap before touching anything\n3. **Assesses risk** - Evaluates test coverage and determines verification strategy\n4. **Plans meticulously** - Creates a detailed plan with Plan agent\n5. **Executes precisely** - Step-by-step refactoring with LSP and AST-grep\n6. **Verifies constantly** - Runs tests after each change to ensure zero regression\n\n---\n\n# PHASE 0: INTENT GATE (MANDATORY FIRST STEP)\n\n**BEFORE ANY ACTION, classify and validate the request.**\n\n## Step 0.1: Parse Request Type\n\n| Signal | Classification | Action |\n|--------|----------------|--------|\n| Specific file/symbol | Explicit | Proceed to codebase analysis |\n| \"Refactor X to Y\" | Clear transformation | Proceed to codebase analysis |\n| \"Improve\", \"Clean up\" | Open-ended | **MUST ask**: \"What specific improvement?\" |\n| Ambiguous scope | Uncertain | **MUST ask**: \"Which modules/files?\" |\n| Missing context | Incomplete | **MUST ask**: \"What's the desired outcome?\" |\n\n## Step 0.2: Validate Understanding\n\nBefore proceeding, confirm:\n- [ ] Target is clearly identified\n- [ ] Desired outcome is understood\n- [ ] Scope is defined (file/module/project)\n- [ ] Success criteria can be articulated\n\n**If ANY of above is unclear, ASK CLARIFYING QUESTION:**\n\n```\nI want to make sure I understand the refactoring goal correctly.\n\n**What I understood**: [interpretation]\n**What I'm unsure about**: [specific ambiguity]\n\nOptions I see:\n1. [Option A] - [implications]\n2. [Option B] - [implications]\n\n**My recommendation**: [suggestion with reasoning]\n\nShould I proceed with [recommendation], or would you prefer differently?\n```\n\n## Step 0.3: Create Initial Todos\n\n**IMMEDIATELY after understanding the request, create todos:**\n\n```\nTodoWrite([\n  {\"id\": \"phase-1\", \"content\": \"PHASE 1: Codebase Analysis - launch parallel explore agents\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-2\", \"content\": \"PHASE 2: Build Codemap - map dependencies and impact zones\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-3\", \"content\": \"PHASE 3: Test Assessment - analyze test coverage and verification strategy\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-4\", \"content\": \"PHASE 4: Plan Generation - invoke Plan agent for detailed refactoring plan\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-5\", \"content\": \"PHASE 5: Execute Refactoring - step-by-step with continuous verification\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-6\", \"content\": \"PHASE 6: Final Verification - full test suite and regression check\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"}\n])\n```\n\n---\n\n# PHASE 1: CODEBASE ANALYSIS (PARALLEL EXPLORATION)\n\n**Mark phase-1 as in_progress.**\n\n## 1.1: Launch Parallel Explore Agents (BACKGROUND)\n\nFire ALL of these simultaneously using `call_omo_agent`:\n\n```\n// Agent 1: Find the refactoring target\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find all occurrences and definitions of [TARGET]. \n  Report: file paths, line numbers, usage patterns.\"\n)\n\n// Agent 2: Find related code\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\", \n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find all code that imports, uses, or depends on [TARGET].\n  Report: dependency chains, import graphs.\"\n)\n\n// Agent 3: Find similar patterns\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find similar code patterns to [TARGET] in the codebase.\n  Report: analogous implementations, established conventions.\"\n)\n\n// Agent 4: Find tests\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find all test files related to [TARGET].\n  Report: test file paths, test case names, coverage indicators.\"\n)\n\n// Agent 5: Architecture context\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find architectural patterns and module organization around [TARGET].\n  Report: module boundaries, layer structure, design patterns in use.\"\n)\n```\n\n## 1.2: Direct Tool Exploration (WHILE AGENTS RUN)\n\nWhile background agents are running, use direct tools:\n\n### LSP Tools for Precise Analysis:\n\n```typescript\n// Find definition(s)\nLspGotoDefinition(filePath, line, character)  // Where is it defined?\n\n// Find ALL usages across workspace\nLspFindReferences(filePath, line, character, includeDeclaration=true)\n\n// Get file structure\nLspDocumentSymbols(filePath)  // Hierarchical outline\nLspWorkspaceSymbols(filePath, query=\"[target_symbol]\")  // Search by name\n\n// Get current diagnostics\nlsp_diagnostics(filePath)  // Errors, warnings before we start\n```\n\n### AST-Grep Skill for Pattern Analysis:\n\n```bash\n// Find structural patterns\npython3 scripts/ast_grep_helper.py search 'function $NAME($$$) { $$$ }' --lang ts src/\n\n# Preview refactoring first\nsg --pattern '[old_pattern]' --rewrite '[new_pattern]' --lang ts src/\n```\n\n### Grep for Text Patterns:\n\n```\ngrep(pattern=\"[search_term]\", path=\"src/\", include=\"*.ts\")\n```\n\n## 1.3: Collect Background Results\n\n```\nbackground_output(task_id=\"[agent_1_id]\")\nbackground_output(task_id=\"[agent_2_id]\")\n...\n```\n\n**Mark phase-1 as completed after all results collected.**\n\n---\n\n";

package/dist/features/builtin-commands/templates/remove-ai-slops.d.ts

@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-export declare const REMOVE_AI_SLOPS_TEMPLATE = "# Remove AI Slops Command\n\n## Codex Harness Tool Compatibility\n\nThis command includes examples for the OpenCode harness. In Codex, do not call OpenCode-only tools such as `call_omo_agent(...)`, `task(...)`, `background_output(...)`, or `team_*(...)` literally. Translate those examples to Codex native tools:\n\n| OpenCode example | Codex tool to use |\n| --- | --- |\n| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type=\"explore\", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type=\"explorer\", task_name=\"...\", message=\"...\")` |\n| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type=\"librarian\", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type=\"librarian\", task_name=\"...\", message=\"...\")` |\n| `task(subagent_type=\"plan\", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type=\"plan\", task_name=\"...\", message=\"...\")` |\n| `task(subagent_type=\"oracle\", ...)` | `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({\"message\":\"TASK: act as a rigorous reviewer. ...\",\"agent_type\":\"lazycodex-gate-reviewer\",\"fork_context\":false})` |\n| `task(category=\"...\", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type=\"worker\", task_name=\"...\", message=\"...\")` |\n| `background_output(task_id=\"...\")` | `wait_agent(...)` to wait for subagent completion and mailbox updates |\n| `team_*(...)` | Use Codex native subagents plus `send_message`, `followup_task`, `wait_agent`, and `close_agent` |\n\nWhen translating `load_skills=[...]`, include the requested skill names in the spawned agent's `message`. If a code block below conflicts with this section, this section wins.\n\n## What this command does\nAnalyzes all files changed in the current branch (compared to parent commit), removes AI-generated code smells in parallel, then critically reviews the changes to ensure safety and behavior preservation. Fixes any issues found during review.\n\n## Step 0: Task Planning\n\nUse TodoWrite to create the task list:\n1. Get changed files from branch\n2. Run $omo:remove-ai-slops on each file in parallel\n3. Critically review all changes\n4. Fix any issues found\n\n## Role Definition\nYou are a senior code quality engineer specialized in identifying and removing AI-generated code patterns while preserving original functionality. You have deep expertise in code review, refactoring safety, and behavioral preservation.\n\n## Process\n\n### Phase 1: Identify Changed Files\nDetect the repository base branch dynamically, then get all changed files in the current branch:\n```bash\nBASE_BRANCH=$(git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's@^refs/remotes/origin/@@' || echo \"main\")\ngit diff $(git merge-base \"$BASE_BRANCH\" HEAD)..HEAD --name-only\n```\n\nIf `git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD` is unavailable, detect the base branch at runtime using the repo's configured remote default branch. Only fall back to `main` as a last resort.\n\n### Phase 2: Parallel AI Slop Removal\nFor each changed file, spawn an agent in parallel using the Task tool with the $omo:remove-ai-slops skill:\n\n```\ntask(category=\"quick\", load_skills=[\"remove-ai-slops\"], run_in_background=true, description=\"Remove AI slops from {filename}\", prompt=\"Remove AI slops from: {file_path}\")\n```\n\n**CRITICAL**: Launch ALL agents in a SINGLE message with multiple Task tool calls for maximum parallelism.\n\nBefore running $omo:remove-ai-slops on each file, save a file-specific rollback artifact that captures only the delta introduced by the slop-removal pass. Use a safe pattern such as generating a per-file patch and reverse-applying it if review fails.\n\nDo NOT use `git checkout -- {file_path}` or any rollback that discards pre-existing branch changes in the file.\n\n### Phase 3: Critical Review\nAfter all $omo:remove-ai-slops agents complete, perform a critical review with the following checklist:\n\n**Safety Verification**:\n- [ ] No functional logic was accidentally removed\n- [ ] All error handling is preserved\n- [ ] Type hints remain correct and complete\n- [ ] Import statements are still valid\n- [ ] No breaking changes to public APIs\n\n**Behavior Preservation**:\n- [ ] Return values unchanged\n- [ ] Side effects unchanged\n- [ ] Exception behavior unchanged\n- [ ] Edge case handling preserved\n\n**Code Quality**:\n- [ ] Removed changes are genuinely AI slop (not intentional patterns)\n- [ ] Remaining code follows project conventions\n- [ ] No orphaned code or dead references\n\n### Phase 4: Fix Issues\nIf any issues are found during critical review:\n1. Identify the specific problem\n2. Explain why it's a problem\n3. Revert only the $omo:remove-ai-slops delta using the saved per-file patch or an equivalent reverse-apply workflow\n4. If remaining ai-slops are found after reverting, remove them by editing the file yourself - with parallel tool calls, per-file\n5. Verify the fix doesn't introduce new issues\n\n## Output Format\n\n### Summary Report\n```\n## AI Slop Removal Summary\n\n### Files Processed\n- file1.py: X changes\n- file2.py: Y changes\n\n### Critical Review Results\n- Safety: PASS/FAIL\n- Behavior: PASS/FAIL\n- Quality: PASS/FAIL\n\n### Issues Found & Fixed\n1. [Issue description] -> [Fix applied]\n\n### Final Status\n[CLEAN / ISSUES FIXED / REQUIRES ATTENTION]\n```\n\n## Quality Assurance\n- NEVER remove code that serves a functional purpose\n- ALWAYS verify changes compile/parse correctly\n- ALWAYS preserve test coverage\n- If uncertain about a change, err on the side of keeping the original code";
+export declare const REMOVE_AI_SLOPS_TEMPLATE = "# Remove AI Slops Command\n\n## Codex Harness Tool Compatibility\n\nThis command includes examples for the OpenCode harness. In Codex, do not call OpenCode-only tools such as `call_omo_agent(...)`, `task(...)`, `background_output(...)`, or `team_*(...)` literally. Translate those examples to Codex native tools:\n\n| OpenCode example | Codex tool to use |\n| --- | --- |\n| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type=\"explore\", ...)` | `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({\"message\":\"TASK: act as an explorer. ...\",\"agent_type\":\"explorer\",\"fork_context\":false})` |\n| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type=\"librarian\", ...)` | `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({\"message\":\"TASK: act as a librarian. ...\",\"agent_type\":\"librarian\",\"fork_context\":false})` |\n| `task(subagent_type=\"plan\", ...)` | `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({\"message\":\"TASK: act as a planning agent. ...\",\"agent_type\":\"plan\",\"fork_context\":false})` |\n| `task(subagent_type=\"oracle\", ...)` | `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({\"message\":\"TASK: act as a rigorous reviewer. ...\",\"agent_type\":\"lazycodex-gate-reviewer\",\"fork_context\":false})` |\n| `task(category=\"...\", ...)` | `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({\"message\":\"TASK: act as an implementation or QA worker. ...\",\"fork_context\":false})` |\n| `background_output(task_id=\"...\")` | `multi_agent_v1.wait_agent(...)` for mailbox signals |\n| `team_*(...)` | Use Codex native subagents via `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent`, `multi_agent_v1.send_input`, `multi_agent_v1.wait_agent`, and `multi_agent_v1.close_agent` |\n\nCodex exposes ONE of two subagent tool surfaces per session; check your own tool list and route accordingly. If `multi_agent_v1.*` tools exist, use the table above as written. If instead a flat `spawn_agent` with a required `task_name` exists (`multi_agent_v2`), rewrite every `multi_agent_v1.*` example: `multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({...,\"fork_context\":false})` becomes `spawn_agent({\"task_name\":\"<lowercase_digits_underscores>\",\"message\":...,\"agent_type\":...,\"fork_turns\":\"none\"})` (`\"all\"` only when full parent history is truly required); `send_input` becomes `send_message`; do not call `close_agent`/`resume_agent` (finished agents end on their own; `followup_task` re-tasks one, `interrupt_agent` stops one); `wait_agent` takes only `timeout_ms` and returns on any child mailbox activity. `agent_type` works the same on both surfaces. If a code block below conflicts with this section, this section wins.\n\nWhen translating `load_skills=[...]`, include the requested skill names in the spawned agent's `message`. If a code block below conflicts with this section, this section wins.\n\n## What this command does\nAnalyzes all files changed in the current branch (compared to parent commit), removes AI-generated code smells in parallel, then critically reviews the changes to ensure safety and behavior preservation. Fixes any issues found during review.\n\n## Step 0: Task Planning\n\nUse TodoWrite to create the task list:\n1. Get changed files from branch\n2. Run $omo:remove-ai-slops on each file in parallel\n3. Critically review all changes\n4. Fix any issues found\n\n## Role Definition\nYou are a senior code quality engineer specialized in identifying and removing AI-generated code patterns while preserving original functionality. You have deep expertise in code review, refactoring safety, and behavioral preservation.\n\n## Process\n\n### Phase 1: Identify Changed Files\nDetect the repository base branch dynamically, then get all changed files in the current branch:\n```bash\nBASE_BRANCH=$(git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's@^refs/remotes/origin/@@' || echo \"main\")\ngit diff $(git merge-base \"$BASE_BRANCH\" HEAD)..HEAD --name-only\n```\n\nIf `git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD` is unavailable, detect the base branch at runtime using the repo's configured remote default branch. Only fall back to `main` as a last resort.\n\n### Phase 2: Parallel AI Slop Removal\nFor each changed file, spawn an agent in parallel using the Task tool with the $omo:remove-ai-slops skill:\n\n```\ntask(category=\"quick\", load_skills=[\"remove-ai-slops\"], run_in_background=true, description=\"Remove AI slops from {filename}\", prompt=\"Remove AI slops from: {file_path}\")\n```\n\n**CRITICAL**: Launch ALL agents in a SINGLE message with multiple Task tool calls for maximum parallelism.\n\nBefore running $omo:remove-ai-slops on each file, save a file-specific rollback artifact that captures only the delta introduced by the slop-removal pass. Use a safe pattern such as generating a per-file patch and reverse-applying it if review fails.\n\nDo NOT use `git checkout -- {file_path}` or any rollback that discards pre-existing branch changes in the file.\n\n### Phase 3: Critical Review\nAfter all $omo:remove-ai-slops agents complete, perform a critical review with the following checklist:\n\n**Safety Verification**:\n- [ ] No functional logic was accidentally removed\n- [ ] All error handling is preserved\n- [ ] Type hints remain correct and complete\n- [ ] Import statements are still valid\n- [ ] No breaking changes to public APIs\n\n**Behavior Preservation**:\n- [ ] Return values unchanged\n- [ ] Side effects unchanged\n- [ ] Exception behavior unchanged\n- [ ] Edge case handling preserved\n\n**Code Quality**:\n- [ ] Removed changes are genuinely AI slop (not intentional patterns)\n- [ ] Remaining code follows project conventions\n- [ ] No orphaned code or dead references\n\n### Phase 4: Fix Issues\nIf any issues are found during critical review:\n1. Identify the specific problem\n2. Explain why it's a problem\n3. Revert only the $omo:remove-ai-slops delta using the saved per-file patch or an equivalent reverse-apply workflow\n4. If remaining ai-slops are found after reverting, remove them by editing the file yourself - with parallel tool calls, per-file\n5. Verify the fix doesn't introduce new issues\n\n## Output Format\n\n### Summary Report\n```\n## AI Slop Removal Summary\n\n### Files Processed\n- file1.py: X changes\n- file2.py: Y changes\n\n### Critical Review Results\n- Safety: PASS/FAIL\n- Behavior: PASS/FAIL\n- Quality: PASS/FAIL\n\n### Issues Found & Fixed\n1. [Issue description] -> [Fix applied]\n\n### Final Status\n[CLEAN / ISSUES FIXED / REQUIRES ATTENTION]\n```\n\n## Quality Assurance\n- NEVER remove code that serves a functional purpose\n- ALWAYS verify changes compile/parse correctly\n- ALWAYS preserve test coverage\n- If uncertain about a change, err on the side of keeping the original code";
 export declare const REMOVE_AI_SLOPS_TEAM_MODE_ADDENDUM = "\n---\n\n# Team Mode Protocol (active when team_* tools are present)\n\nTeam mode is enabled for this session. The rules below **override Phase 2-4** of the legacy flow above. Follow this protocol instead of the per-file fire-and-forget `task()` dispatch.\n\n## Phase 2 (team): `slop-squad` setup\n\n**Precondition checks** (fail hard if any step fails):\n\n1. Load the `team-mode` skill via the `skill` tool for lifecycle, message protocol, broadcast rules, 32KB message cap, and 4 parallel worker cap.\n2. Call `team_list` and verify no active run named `slop-squad` exists. If one does, it is an orphan from a crashed prior session \u2014 `team_shutdown_request` + `team_approve_shutdown` + `team_delete` it before proceeding. Do not rename the team or run concurrent sessions under the same name.\n3. If `~/.omo/teams/slop-squad/config.json` is missing, write it using the spec below.\n\n**Team spec** (`~/.omo/teams/slop-squad/config.json`):\n\n```json\n{\n  \"name\": \"slop-squad\",\n  \"lead\": { \"kind\": \"subagent_type\", \"subagent_type\": \"sisyphus\" },\n  \"members\": [\n    {\n      \"kind\": \"category\",\n      \"category\": \"quick\",\n      \"prompt\": \"You run $omo:remove-ai-slops on ONE file per task. Load $omo:remove-ai-slops via the skill tool. Read the task description for the file path. Apply the skill's detection criteria verbatim. After edits: run lsp_diagnostics on the file. Report via team_send_message(teamRunId=<id>, to=\"lead\", summary=<change count>, body=<full $omo:remove-ai-slops report>) + team_task_update(status=completed). On ambiguity: send team_send_message(teamRunId=<id>, to=\"lead\", summary=\"UNCLEAR\", body=<reason>) + team_task_update(status=pending). Never git add, never run tests, never touch other files.\"\n    },\n    { \"kind\": \"category\", \"category\": \"quick\", \"prompt\": \"Same contract as peer quick worker.\" },\n    { \"kind\": \"category\", \"category\": \"quick\", \"prompt\": \"Same contract as peer quick worker.\" },\n    {\n      \"kind\": \"category\",\n      \"category\": \"unspecified-low\",\n      \"prompt\": \"You are the FIX worker. You claim rework tasks that the lead creates after the external reviewer flags issues. Read the reviewer's per-hunk rollback instructions in the task description, apply the reverse patch, then run $omo:remove-ai-slops ONLY on the non-rolled-back remainder. Same reporting contract as quick peers. Handle UNCLEAR escalations the same way.\"\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```\n\nRationale for this composition:\n- **4 workers = team mode's parallel cap.** A fifth member just queues.\n- **Reviewer is NOT a team member** \u2014 review demands stronger reasoning than category routing provides (team category members are downcast to sisyphus-junior). The reviewer runs OUTSIDE the team as a `deep` task; see Phase 3.\n- **quick \u00D7 3** absorbs the mass of per-file slop removal. **unspecified-low \u00D7 1** is the rework lane for fixes triggered by reviewer findings.\n\n**Team lifecycle** (create once, reuse until Phase 5 cleanup):\n\n1. `team_create(teamName=\"slop-squad\")`. Record `teamRunId` \u2014 every subsequent team call needs it.\n2. Broadcast the detection criteria ONCE so each task description stays minimal:\n   ```\n   team_send_message(\n     teamRunId=<id>, to=\"*\", kind=\"announcement\",\n     summary=\"slop-criteria\",\n     body=<the 9 slop categories + KEEP rules; reference the $omo:remove-ai-slops skill content>\n   )\n   ```\n3. Before spawning tasks, save a per-file rollback artifact that captures only the delta the slop-removal pass will introduce. Do NOT use `git checkout -- <file>` \u2014 that would discard pre-existing branch changes.\n4. For each changed file, `team_task_create(teamRunId=<id>, subject=\"slop: <file>\", description=<file path + rollback artifact path + reporting format>, blockedBy=[])`.\n\n## Phase 3 (team): Incremental reviewer dispatch\n\nWhile any team task is `pending | claimed | in_progress`:\n\n- Wait for `<system-reminder>` or member messages. Do NOT tight-poll `team_status`; the runtime notifies on state changes. A single `team_status` check is acceptable if no notification arrives within roughly 10 seconds of expected completion.\n- On each worker completion report:\n  - Log the report to the pending final summary (no blocking).\n  - Immediately dispatch an **external reviewer** \u2014 review runs OUTSIDE the team because team-member category routing downcasts to sisyphus-junior:\n    ```\n    task(\n      category=\"deep\",\n      load_skills=[],\n      run_in_background=true,\n      description=\"slop review: <file>\",\n      prompt=<file path + full worker report + Safety/Behavior/Quality checklist + instruction to output \"PASS\" or \"FAIL:<per-hunk rollback instructions>\">\n    )\n    ```\n    If `deep` is unavailable in this session, fall back to `category=\"unspecified-high\"`.\n- On a reviewer task returning FAIL:\n  - Create a rework team task: `team_task_create(subject=\"rework: <file>\", description=<reverse-patch hunks from reviewer + \"then run $omo:remove-ai-slops on remaining non-rolled-back issues only\">)`. The `unspecified-low` fix member claims it.\n  - Create a new reviewer task paired to the rework completion (same incremental pattern).\n- Loop until every file has a PASS from the reviewer AND no team task is outstanding.\n\n## Phase 4 (team): Fix issues\n\nFixes happen incrementally during Phase 3's loop via rework tasks \u2014 this phase is already handled when the loop exits. Any remaining manual fix that neither worker nor fix member could resolve is handled by Lead here, editing files directly.\n\n## Phase 5 (team): Team cleanup\n\nBefore producing the summary report, dismantle the team on EVERY exit path \u2014 success, escalation, abort \u2014 otherwise the next session's Phase 2 precondition check catches the orphan.\n\n1. `team_shutdown_request` for each member, then `team_approve_shutdown` if members do not self-approve within a reasonable window.\n2. `team_delete(teamRunId=<id>)`.\n3. `team_list` to confirm no residual `slop-squad` run.\n\nThe `~/.omo/teams/slop-squad/config.json` declaration file stays on disk; it is reused next session.\n\n## MUST NOT (team mode)\n\n- Lead never edits files directly \u2014 orchestrate only. If editing is needed, it goes into a team task.\n- Do not inline the full slop-criteria into every task description; rely on the Phase 2 broadcast.\n- Do not call `team_create` again mid-session. One team per resolution.\n- Do not put `oracle` / `librarian` into the team spec \u2014 they are team-ineligible; call them via `task()` outside the team when needed.\n";

package/dist/features/builtin-commands/templates/start-work.d.ts

@@ -1 +1 @@
-export declare const START_WORK_TEMPLATE = "You are starting a Sisyphus work session.\n\n## ARGUMENTS\n\n- `/start-work [plan-name] [--worktree <path>]`\n  - `plan-name` (optional): name or partial match of the plan to start\n  - `--worktree <path>` (optional): absolute path to an existing git worktree to work in\n    - If specified and valid: hook pre-sets worktree_path in boulder.json\n    - If specified but invalid: you must run `git worktree add <path> <branch>` first\n    - If omitted: work directly in the current project directory (no worktree)\n\n## WHAT TO DO\n\n1. **Find available plans**: Search for Prometheus-generated plan files at `.omo/plans/`\n\n2. **Check for active boulder state**: Read `.omo/boulder.json` if it exists\n\n3. **Decision logic**:\n   - If multiple active works are listed in your context:\n     - This means boulder.json has more than one work with status: `active` or `paused`\n     - Use the Question tool to ask the user which plan to resume\n     - Resume by running `/start-work {plan-name}` for the selected plan\n     - If the user says \"start a new plan\", continue with cold-start auto-selection logic\n   - If exactly one active work is listed and the user did not name a plan:\n     - Auto-resume that single active work\n   - If no active plan OR plan is complete:\n     - List available plan files\n     - If ONE plan: auto-select it\n     - If MULTIPLE plans: show list with timestamps, ask user to select\n\n4. **Worktree Setup** (ONLY when `--worktree` was explicitly specified and `worktree_path` not already set in boulder.json):\n   1. `git worktree list --porcelain` - see available worktrees\n   2. Create: `git worktree add <absolute-path> <branch-or-HEAD>`\n   3. Update boulder.json to add `\"worktree_path\": \"<absolute-path>\"`\n   4. All work happens inside that worktree directory\n\n5. **Create/Update boulder.json**:\n   ```json\n   {\n     \"active_plan\": \"/absolute/path/to/plan.md\",\n     \"started_at\": \"ISO_TIMESTAMP\",\n     \"session_ids\": [\"session_id_1\", \"session_id_2\"],\n     \"plan_name\": \"plan-name\",\n     \"worktree_path\": \"/absolute/path/to/git/worktree\"\n   }\n   ```\n\n6. **Read the plan file** and start executing tasks according to atlas workflow\n\n## OUTPUT FORMAT\n\nWhen listing plans for selection:\n```\nAvailable Work Plans\n\nCurrent Time: {ISO timestamp}\nSession ID: {current session id}\n\n1. [plan-name-1.md] - Modified: {date} - Progress: 3/10 tasks\n2. [plan-name-2.md] - Modified: {date} - Progress: 0/5 tasks\n\nWhich plan would you like to work on? (Enter number or plan name)\n```\n\nWhen resuming existing work:\n```\nResuming Work Session\n\nActive Plan: {plan-name}\nProgress: {completed}/{total} tasks\nSessions: {count} (appending current session)\nWorktree: {worktree_path}\n\nReading plan and continuing from last incomplete task...\n```\n\nWhen auto-selecting single plan:\n```\nStarting Work Session\n\nPlan: {plan-name}\nSession ID: {session_id}\nStarted: {timestamp}\nWorktree: {worktree_path}\n\nReading plan and beginning execution...\n```\n\n## CRITICAL\n\n- The session_id is injected by the hook - use it directly\n- Always update boulder.json BEFORE starting work\n- If worktree_path is set in boulder.json, all work happens inside that worktree directory\n- Read the FULL plan file before delegating any tasks\n- Follow atlas delegation protocols (7-section format)\n\n## TASK BREAKDOWN (MANDATORY)\n\nAfter reading the plan file, you MUST decompose every plan task into granular, implementation-level sub-steps and register ALL of them as task/todo items BEFORE starting any work.\n\n**How to break down**:\n- Each plan checkbox item (e.g., `- [ ] Add user authentication`) must be split into concrete, actionable sub-tasks\n- Sub-tasks should be specific enough that each one touches a clear set of files/functions\n- Include: file to modify, what to change, expected behavior, and how to verify\n- Do NOT leave any task vague - \"implement feature X\" is NOT acceptable; \"add validateToken() to src/auth/middleware.ts that checks JWT expiry and returns 401\" IS acceptable\n\n**Example breakdown**:\nPlan task: `- [ ] Add rate limiting to API`\n\u2192 Todo items:\n  1. Create `src/middleware/rate-limiter.ts` with sliding window algorithm (max 100 req/min per IP)\n  2. Add RateLimiter middleware to `src/app.ts` router chain, before auth middleware\n  3. Add rate limit headers (X-RateLimit-Limit, X-RateLimit-Remaining) to response in `rate-limiter.ts`\n  4. Add test: verify 429 response after exceeding limit in `src/middleware/rate-limiter.test.ts`\n  5. Add test: verify headers are present on normal responses\n\nRegister these as task/todo items so progress is tracked and visible throughout the session.\n\n## WORKTREE COMPLETION\n\nWhen working in a worktree (`worktree_path` is set in boulder.json) and ALL plan tasks are complete:\n1. Commit all remaining changes in the worktree\n2. **Sync .omo state back**: Copy `.omo/` from the worktree to the main repo before removal.\n   This is CRITICAL when `.omo/` is gitignored - state written during worktree execution would otherwise be lost.\n   ```bash\n   cp -r <worktree-path>/.omo/* <main-repo>/.omo/ 2>/dev/null || true\n   ```\n3. Switch to the main working directory (the original repo, NOT the worktree)\n4. Merge the worktree branch into the current branch: `git merge <worktree-branch>`\n5. If merge succeeds, clean up: `git worktree remove <worktree-path>`\n6. Remove the boulder.json state\n\nThis is the DEFAULT behavior when `--worktree` was used. Skip merge only if the user explicitly instructs otherwise (e.g., asks to create a PR instead).";
+export declare const START_WORK_TEMPLATE = "You are starting an Atlas work session.\n\n## ARGUMENTS\n\n- `/start-work [plan-name] [--worktree <path>]`\n  - `plan-name` (optional): name or partial match of the plan to start\n  - `--worktree <path>` (optional): absolute path to an existing git worktree to work in\n    - If specified and valid: hook pre-sets worktree_path in boulder.json\n    - If specified but invalid: you must run `git worktree add <path> <branch>` first\n    - If omitted: work directly in the current project directory (no worktree)\n\n## WHAT TO DO\n\n1. **Find available plans**: Search for Prometheus-generated plan files at `.omo/plans/`\n\n2. **Check for active boulder state**: Read `.omo/boulder.json` if it exists\n\n3. **Decision logic**:\n   - If multiple active works are listed in your context:\n     - This means boulder.json has more than one work with status: `active` or `paused`\n     - Use the Question tool to ask the user which plan to resume\n     - Resume by running `/start-work {plan-name}` for the selected plan\n     - If the user says \"start a new plan\", continue with cold-start auto-selection logic\n   - If exactly one active work is listed and the user did not name a plan:\n     - Auto-resume that single active work\n   - If no active plan OR plan is complete:\n     - List available plan files\n     - If ONE plan: auto-select it\n     - If MULTIPLE plans: show list with timestamps, ask user to select\n\n4. **Worktree Setup** (ONLY when `--worktree` was explicitly specified and `worktree_path` not already set in boulder.json):\n   1. `git worktree list --porcelain` - see available worktrees\n   2. Create: `git worktree add <absolute-path> <branch-or-HEAD>`\n   3. Update boulder.json to add `\"worktree_path\": \"<absolute-path>\"`\n   4. All work happens inside that worktree directory\n\n5. **Create/Update boulder.json**:\n   ```json\n   {\n     \"active_plan\": \"/absolute/path/to/plan.md\",\n     \"started_at\": \"ISO_TIMESTAMP\",\n     \"session_ids\": [\"session_id_1\", \"session_id_2\"],\n     \"plan_name\": \"plan-name\",\n     \"worktree_path\": \"/absolute/path/to/git/worktree\"\n   }\n   ```\n\n6. **Read the plan file** and start executing tasks according to atlas workflow\n\n## OUTPUT FORMAT\n\nWhen listing plans for selection:\n```\nAvailable Work Plans\n\nCurrent Time: {ISO timestamp}\nSession ID: {current session id}\n\n1. [plan-name-1.md] - Modified: {date} - Progress: 3/10 tasks\n2. [plan-name-2.md] - Modified: {date} - Progress: 0/5 tasks\n\nWhich plan would you like to work on? (Enter number or plan name)\n```\n\nWhen resuming existing work:\n```\nResuming Work Session\n\nActive Plan: {plan-name}\nProgress: {completed}/{total} tasks\nSessions: {count} (appending current session)\nWorktree: {worktree_path}\n\nReading plan and continuing from last incomplete task...\n```\n\nWhen auto-selecting single plan:\n```\nStarting Work Session\n\nPlan: {plan-name}\nSession ID: {session_id}\nStarted: {timestamp}\nWorktree: {worktree_path}\n\nReading plan and beginning execution...\n```\n\n## CRITICAL\n\n- The session_id is injected by the hook - use it directly\n- Always update boulder.json BEFORE starting work\n- If worktree_path is set in boulder.json, all work happens inside that worktree directory\n- Read the FULL plan file before delegating any tasks\n- Follow atlas delegation protocols (7-section format)\n\n## TASK BREAKDOWN (MANDATORY)\n\nAfter reading the plan file, you MUST decompose every plan task into granular, implementation-level sub-steps and register ALL of them as task/todo items BEFORE starting any work.\n\n**How to break down**:\n- Each plan checkbox item (e.g., `- [ ] Add user authentication`) must be split into concrete, actionable sub-tasks\n- Sub-tasks should be specific enough that each one touches a clear set of files/functions\n- Include: file to modify, what to change, expected behavior, and how to verify\n- Do NOT leave any task vague - \"implement feature X\" is NOT acceptable; \"add validateToken() to src/auth/middleware.ts that checks JWT expiry and returns 401\" IS acceptable\n\n**Example breakdown**:\nPlan task: `- [ ] Add rate limiting to API`\n\u2192 Todo items:\n  1. Create `src/middleware/rate-limiter.ts` with sliding window algorithm (max 100 req/min per IP)\n  2. Add RateLimiter middleware to `src/app.ts` router chain, before auth middleware\n  3. Add rate limit headers (X-RateLimit-Limit, X-RateLimit-Remaining) to response in `rate-limiter.ts`\n  4. Add test: verify 429 response after exceeding limit in `src/middleware/rate-limiter.test.ts`\n  5. Add test: verify headers are present on normal responses\n\nRegister these as task/todo items so progress is tracked and visible throughout the session.\n\n## WORKTREE COMPLETION\n\nWhen working in a worktree (`worktree_path` is set in boulder.json) and ALL plan tasks are complete:\n1. Commit all remaining changes in the worktree\n2. **Sync .omo state back**: Copy `.omo/` from the worktree to the main repo before removal.\n   This is CRITICAL when `.omo/` is gitignored - state written during worktree execution would otherwise be lost.\n   ```bash\n   cp -r <worktree-path>/.omo/* <main-repo>/.omo/ 2>/dev/null || true\n   ```\n3. Switch to the main working directory (the original repo, NOT the worktree)\n4. Merge the worktree branch into the current branch: `git merge <worktree-branch>`\n5. If merge succeeds, clean up: `git worktree remove <worktree-path>`\n6. Remove the boulder.json state\n\nThis is the DEFAULT behavior when `--worktree` was used. Skip merge only if the user explicitly instructs otherwise (e.g., asks to create a PR instead).";

package/dist/features/monitor/process.d.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 export type TimerHandle = ReturnType<typeof setTimeout> | number;
 export interface SpawnDeps {
-    spawn?: typeof Bun.spawn;
+    spawn?: SpawnFunction;
     setTimer: (fn: () => void, ms: number) => TimerHandle;
     clearTimer: (handle: TimerHandle) => void;
 }
@@ -13,9 +13,25 @@ export interface MonitoredProcess {
     stdout: ReadableStream<Uint8Array>;
     stderr: ReadableStream<Uint8Array>;
 }
+interface SpawnedMonitorProcess {
+    readonly exited: Promise<number>;
+    readonly stdout: ReadableStream<Uint8Array>;
+    readonly stderr: ReadableStream<Uint8Array>;
+    readonly pid?: number;
+    readonly signalCode?: NodeJS.Signals | null;
+}
+type SpawnFunction = (argv: readonly string[], options: {
+    readonly cwd?: string;
+    readonly env?: Record<string, string>;
+    readonly detached: boolean;
+    readonly stdin: "ignore";
+    readonly stdout: "pipe";
+    readonly stderr: "pipe";
+}) => SpawnedMonitorProcess;
 export declare function spawnMonitoredProcess(opts: {
     command: string;
     cwd?: string;
     env?: Record<string, string>;
     maxRuntimeMs: number;
 }, deps: SpawnDeps): MonitoredProcess;
+export {};