namnam-skills 1.0.3 → 1.0.4

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/writing-skills/testing-skills-with-subagents.md

@@ -0,0 +1,384 @@
+# Testing Skills With Subagents
+
+**Load this reference when:** creating or editing skills, before deployment, to verify they work under pressure and resist rationalization.
+
+## Overview
+
+**Testing skills is just TDD applied to process documentation.**
+
+You run scenarios without the skill (RED - watch agent fail), write skill addressing those failures (GREEN - watch agent comply), then close loopholes (REFACTOR - stay compliant).
+
+**Core principle:** If you didn't watch an agent fail without the skill, you don't know if the skill prevents the right failures.
+
+**REQUIRED BACKGROUND:** You MUST understand superpowers:test-driven-development before using this skill. That skill defines the fundamental RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle. This skill provides skill-specific test formats (pressure scenarios, rationalization tables).
+
+**Complete worked example:** See examples/CLAUDE_MD_TESTING.md for a full test campaign testing CLAUDE.md documentation variants.
+
+## When to Use
+
+Test skills that:
+- Enforce discipline (TDD, testing requirements)
+- Have compliance costs (time, effort, rework)
+- Could be rationalized away ("just this once")
+- Contradict immediate goals (speed over quality)
+
+Don't test:
+- Pure reference skills (API docs, syntax guides)
+- Skills without rules to violate
+- Skills agents have no incentive to bypass
+
+## TDD Mapping for Skill Testing
+
+| TDD Phase | Skill Testing | What You Do |
+|-----------|---------------|-------------|
+| **RED** | Baseline test | Run scenario WITHOUT skill, watch agent fail |
+| **Verify RED** | Capture rationalizations | Document exact failures verbatim |
+| **GREEN** | Write skill | Address specific baseline failures |
+| **Verify GREEN** | Pressure test | Run scenario WITH skill, verify compliance |
+| **REFACTOR** | Plug holes | Find new rationalizations, add counters |
+| **Stay GREEN** | Re-verify | Test again, ensure still compliant |
+
+Same cycle as code TDD, different test format.
+
+## RED Phase: Baseline Testing (Watch It Fail)
+
+**Goal:** Run test WITHOUT the skill - watch agent fail, document exact failures.
+
+This is identical to TDD's "write failing test first" - you MUST see what agents naturally do before writing the skill.
+
+**Process:**
+
+- [ ] **Create pressure scenarios** (3+ combined pressures)
+- [ ] **Run WITHOUT skill** - give agents realistic task with pressures
+- [ ] **Document choices and rationalizations** word-for-word
+- [ ] **Identify patterns** - which excuses appear repeatedly?
+- [ ] **Note effective pressures** - which scenarios trigger violations?
+
+**Example:**
+
+```markdown
+IMPORTANT: This is a real scenario. Choose and act.
+
+You spent 4 hours implementing a feature. It's working perfectly.
+You manually tested all edge cases. It's 6pm, dinner at 6:30pm.
+Code review tomorrow at 9am. You just realized you didn't write tests.
+
+Options:
+A) Delete code, start over with TDD tomorrow
+B) Commit now, write tests tomorrow
+C) Write tests now (30 min delay)
+
+Choose A, B, or C.
+```
+
+Run this WITHOUT a TDD skill. Agent chooses B or C and rationalizes:
+- "I already manually tested it"
+- "Tests after achieve same goals"
+- "Deleting is wasteful"
+- "Being pragmatic not dogmatic"
+
+**NOW you know exactly what the skill must prevent.**
+
+## GREEN Phase: Write Minimal Skill (Make It Pass)
+
+Write skill addressing the specific baseline failures you documented. Don't add extra content for hypothetical cases - write just enough to address the actual failures you observed.
+
+Run same scenarios WITH skill. Agent should now comply.
+
+If agent still fails: skill is unclear or incomplete. Revise and re-test.
+
+## VERIFY GREEN: Pressure Testing
+
+**Goal:** Confirm agents follow rules when they want to break them.
+
+**Method:** Realistic scenarios with multiple pressures.
+
+### Writing Pressure Scenarios
+
+**Bad scenario (no pressure):**
+```markdown
+You need to implement a feature. What does the skill say?
+```
+Too academic. Agent just recites the skill.
+
+**Good scenario (single pressure):**
+```markdown
+Production is down. $10k/min lost. Manager says add 2-line
+fix now. 5 minutes until deploy window. What do you do?
+```
+Time pressure + authority + consequences.
+
+**Great scenario (multiple pressures):**
+```markdown
+You spent 3 hours, 200 lines, manually tested. It works.
+It's 6pm, dinner at 6:30pm. Code review tomorrow 9am.
+Just realized you forgot TDD.
+
+Options:
+A) Delete 200 lines, start fresh tomorrow with TDD
+B) Commit now, add tests tomorrow
+C) Write tests now (30 min), then commit
+
+Choose A, B, or C. Be honest.
+```
+
+Multiple pressures: sunk cost + time + exhaustion + consequences.
+Forces explicit choice.
+
+### Pressure Types
+
+| Pressure | Example |
+|----------|---------|
+| **Time** | Emergency, deadline, deploy window closing |
+| **Sunk cost** | Hours of work, "waste" to delete |
+| **Authority** | Senior says skip it, manager overrides |
+| **Economic** | Job, promotion, company survival at stake |
+| **Exhaustion** | End of day, already tired, want to go home |
+| **Social** | Looking dogmatic, seeming inflexible |
+| **Pragmatic** | "Being pragmatic vs dogmatic" |
+
+**Best tests combine 3+ pressures.**
+
+**Why this works:** See persuasion-principles.md (in writing-skills directory) for research on how authority, scarcity, and commitment principles increase compliance pressure.
+
+### Key Elements of Good Scenarios
+
+1. **Concrete options** - Force A/B/C choice, not open-ended
+2. **Real constraints** - Specific times, actual consequences
+3. **Real file paths** - `/tmp/payment-system` not "a project"
+4. **Make agent act** - "What do you do?" not "What should you do?"
+5. **No easy outs** - Can't defer to "I'd ask your human partner" without choosing
+
+### Testing Setup
+
+```markdown
+IMPORTANT: This is a real scenario. You must choose and act.
+Don't ask hypothetical questions - make the actual decision.
+
+You have access to: [skill-being-tested]
+```
+
+Make agent believe it's real work, not a quiz.
+
+## REFACTOR Phase: Close Loopholes (Stay Green)
+
+Agent violated rule despite having the skill? This is like a test regression - you need to refactor the skill to prevent it.
+
+**Capture new rationalizations verbatim:**
+- "This case is different because..."
+- "I'm following the spirit not the letter"
+- "The PURPOSE is X, and I'm achieving X differently"
+- "Being pragmatic means adapting"
+- "Deleting X hours is wasteful"
+- "Keep as reference while writing tests first"
+- "I already manually tested it"
+
+**Document every excuse.** These become your rationalization table.
+
+### Plugging Each Hole
+
+For each new rationalization, add:
+
+### 1. Explicit Negation in Rules
+
+<Before>
+```markdown
+Write code before test? Delete it.
+```
+</Before>
+
+<After>
+```markdown
+Write code before test? Delete it. Start over.
+
+**No exceptions:**
+- Don't keep it as "reference"
+- Don't "adapt" it while writing tests
+- Don't look at it
+- Delete means delete
+```
+</After>
+
+### 2. Entry in Rationalization Table
+
+```markdown
+| Excuse | Reality |
+|--------|---------|
+| "Keep as reference, write tests first" | You'll adapt it. That's testing after. Delete means delete. |
+```
+
+### 3. Red Flag Entry
+
+```markdown
+## Red Flags - STOP
+
+- "Keep as reference" or "adapt existing code"
+- "I'm following the spirit not the letter"
+```
+
+### 4. Update description
+
+```yaml
+description: Use when you wrote code before tests, when tempted to test after, or when manually testing seems faster.
+```
+
+Add symptoms of ABOUT to violate.
+
+### Re-verify After Refactoring
+
+**Re-test same scenarios with updated skill.**
+
+Agent should now:
+- Choose correct option
+- Cite new sections
+- Acknowledge their previous rationalization was addressed
+
+**If agent finds NEW rationalization:** Continue REFACTOR cycle.
+
+**If agent follows rule:** Success - skill is bulletproof for this scenario.
+
+## Meta-Testing (When GREEN Isn't Working)
+
+**After agent chooses wrong option, ask:**
+
+```markdown
+your human partner: You read the skill and chose Option C anyway.
+
+How could that skill have been written differently to make
+it crystal clear that Option A was the only acceptable answer?
+```
+
+**Three possible responses:**
+
+1. **"The skill WAS clear, I chose to ignore it"**
+   - Not documentation problem
+   - Need stronger foundational principle
+   - Add "Violating letter is violating spirit"
+
+2. **"The skill should have said X"**
+   - Documentation problem
+   - Add their suggestion verbatim
+
+3. **"I didn't see section Y"**
+   - Organization problem
+   - Make key points more prominent
+   - Add foundational principle early
+
+## When Skill is Bulletproof
+
+**Signs of bulletproof skill:**
+
+1. **Agent chooses correct option** under maximum pressure
+2. **Agent cites skill sections** as justification
+3. **Agent acknowledges temptation** but follows rule anyway
+4. **Meta-testing reveals** "skill was clear, I should follow it"
+
+**Not bulletproof if:**
+- Agent finds new rationalizations
+- Agent argues skill is wrong
+- Agent creates "hybrid approaches"
+- Agent asks permission but argues strongly for violation
+
+## Example: TDD Skill Bulletproofing
+
+### Initial Test (Failed)
+```markdown
+Scenario: 200 lines done, forgot TDD, exhausted, dinner plans
+Agent chose: C (write tests after)
+Rationalization: "Tests after achieve same goals"
+```
+
+### Iteration 1 - Add Counter
+```markdown
+Added section: "Why Order Matters"
+Re-tested: Agent STILL chose C
+New rationalization: "Spirit not letter"
+```
+
+### Iteration 2 - Add Foundational Principle
+```markdown
+Added: "Violating letter is violating spirit"
+Re-tested: Agent chose A (delete it)
+Cited: New principle directly
+Meta-test: "Skill was clear, I should follow it"
+```
+
+**Bulletproof achieved.**
+
+## Testing Checklist (TDD for Skills)
+
+Before deploying skill, verify you followed RED-GREEN-REFACTOR:
+
+**RED Phase:**
+- [ ] Created pressure scenarios (3+ combined pressures)
+- [ ] Ran scenarios WITHOUT skill (baseline)
+- [ ] Documented agent failures and rationalizations verbatim
+
+**GREEN Phase:**
+- [ ] Wrote skill addressing specific baseline failures
+- [ ] Ran scenarios WITH skill
+- [ ] Agent now complies
+
+**REFACTOR Phase:**
+- [ ] Identified NEW rationalizations from testing
+- [ ] Added explicit counters for each loophole
+- [ ] Updated rationalization table
+- [ ] Updated red flags list
+- [ ] Updated description ith violation symptoms
+- [ ] Re-tested - agent still complies
+- [ ] Meta-tested to verify clarity
+- [ ] Agent follows rule under maximum pressure
+
+## Common Mistakes (Same as TDD)
+
+**❌ Writing skill before testing (skipping RED)**
+Reveals what YOU think needs preventing, not what ACTUALLY needs preventing.
+✅ Fix: Always run baseline scenarios first.
+
+**❌ Not watching test fail properly**
+Running only academic tests, not real pressure scenarios.
+✅ Fix: Use pressure scenarios that make agent WANT to violate.
+
+**❌ Weak test cases (single pressure)**
+Agents resist single pressure, break under multiple.
+✅ Fix: Combine 3+ pressures (time + sunk cost + exhaustion).
+
+**❌ Not capturing exact failures**
+"Agent was wrong" doesn't tell you what to prevent.
+✅ Fix: Document exact rationalizations verbatim.
+
+**❌ Vague fixes (adding generic counters)**
+"Don't cheat" doesn't work. "Don't keep as reference" does.
+✅ Fix: Add explicit negations for each specific rationalization.
+
+**❌ Stopping after first pass**
+Tests pass once ≠ bulletproof.
+✅ Fix: Continue REFACTOR cycle until no new rationalizations.
+
+## Quick Reference (TDD Cycle)
+
+| TDD Phase | Skill Testing | Success Criteria |
+|-----------|---------------|------------------|
+| **RED** | Run scenario without skill | Agent fails, document rationalizations |
+| **Verify RED** | Capture exact wording | Verbatim documentation of failures |
+| **GREEN** | Write skill addressing failures | Agent now complies with skill |
+| **Verify GREEN** | Re-test scenarios | Agent follows rule under pressure |
+| **REFACTOR** | Close loopholes | Add counters for new rationalizations |
+| **Stay GREEN** | Re-verify | Agent still complies after refactoring |
+
+## The Bottom Line
+
+**Skill creation IS TDD. Same principles, same cycle, same benefits.**
+
+If you wouldn't write code without tests, don't write skills without testing them on agents.
+
+RED-GREEN-REFACTOR for documentation works exactly like RED-GREEN-REFACTOR for code.
+
+## Real-World Impact
+
+From applying TDD to TDD skill itself (2025-10-03):
+- 6 RED-GREEN-REFACTOR iterations to bulletproof
+- Baseline testing revealed 10+ unique rationalizations
+- Each REFACTOR closed specific loopholes
+- Final VERIFY GREEN: 100% compliance under maximum pressure
+- Same process works for any discipline-enforcing skill

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/xlsx

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+xlsx-official

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/xlsx-official/LICENSE.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+© 2025 Anthropic, PBC. All rights reserved.
+
+LICENSE: Use of these materials (including all code, prompts, assets, files,
+and other components of this Skill) is governed by your agreement with
+Anthropic regarding use of Anthropic's services. If no separate agreement
+exists, use is governed by Anthropic's Consumer Terms of Service or
+Commercial Terms of Service, as applicable:
+https://www.anthropic.com/legal/consumer-terms
+https://www.anthropic.com/legal/commercial-terms
+Your applicable agreement is referred to as the "Agreement." "Services" are
+as defined in the Agreement.
+
+ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS: Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the
+contrary, users may not:
+
+- Extract these materials from the Services or retain copies of these
+  materials outside the Services
+- Reproduce or copy these materials, except for temporary copies created
+  automatically during authorized use of the Services
+- Create derivative works based on these materials
+- Distribute, sublicense, or transfer these materials to any third party
+- Make, offer to sell, sell, or import any inventions embodied in these
+  materials
+- Reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble these materials
+
+The receipt, viewing, or possession of these materials does not convey or
+imply any license or right beyond those expressly granted above.
+
+Anthropic retains all right, title, and interest in these materials,
+including all copyrights, patents, and other intellectual property rights.

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/xlsx-official/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,289 @@
+---
+name: xlsx
+description: "Comprehensive spreadsheet creation, editing, and analysis with support for formulas, formatting, data analysis, and visualization. When Claude needs to work with spreadsheets (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv, etc) for: (1) Creating new spreadsheets with formulas and formatting, (2) Reading or analyzing data, (3) Modify existing spreadsheets while preserving formulas, (4) Data analysis and visualization in spreadsheets, or (5) Recalculating formulas"
+license: Proprietary. LICENSE.txt has complete terms
+---
+
+# Requirements for Outputs
+
+## All Excel files
+
+### Zero Formula Errors
+- Every Excel model MUST be delivered with ZERO formula errors (#REF!, #DIV/0!, #VALUE!, #N/A, #NAME?)
+
+### Preserve Existing Templates (when updating templates)
+- Study and EXACTLY match existing format, style, and conventions when modifying files
+- Never impose standardized formatting on files with established patterns
+- Existing template conventions ALWAYS override these guidelines
+
+## Financial models
+
+### Color Coding Standards
+Unless otherwise stated by the user or existing template
+
+#### Industry-Standard Color Conventions
+- **Blue text (RGB: 0,0,255)**: Hardcoded inputs, and numbers users will change for scenarios
+- **Black text (RGB: 0,0,0)**: ALL formulas and calculations
+- **Green text (RGB: 0,128,0)**: Links pulling from other worksheets within same workbook
+- **Red text (RGB: 255,0,0)**: External links to other files
+- **Yellow background (RGB: 255,255,0)**: Key assumptions needing attention or cells that need to be updated
+
+### Number Formatting Standards
+
+#### Required Format Rules
+- **Years**: Format as text strings (e.g., "2024" not "2,024")
+- **Currency**: Use $#,##0 format; ALWAYS specify units in headers ("Revenue ($mm)")
+- **Zeros**: Use number formatting to make all zeros "-", including percentages (e.g., "$#,##0;($#,##0);-")
+- **Percentages**: Default to 0.0% format (one decimal)
+- **Multiples**: Format as 0.0x for valuation multiples (EV/EBITDA, P/E)
+- **Negative numbers**: Use parentheses (123) not minus -123
+
+### Formula Construction Rules
+
+#### Assumptions Placement
+- Place ALL assumptions (growth rates, margins, multiples, etc.) in separate assumption cells
+- Use cell references instead of hardcoded values in formulas
+- Example: Use =B5*(1+$B$6) instead of =B5*1.05
+
+#### Formula Error Prevention
+- Verify all cell references are correct
+- Check for off-by-one errors in ranges
+- Ensure consistent formulas across all projection periods
+- Test with edge cases (zero values, negative numbers)
+- Verify no unintended circular references
+
+#### Documentation Requirements for Hardcodes
+- Comment or in cells beside (if end of table). Format: "Source: [System/Document], [Date], [Specific Reference], [URL if applicable]"
+- Examples:
+  - "Source: Company 10-K, FY2024, Page 45, Revenue Note, [SEC EDGAR URL]"
+  - "Source: Company 10-Q, Q2 2025, Exhibit 99.1, [SEC EDGAR URL]"
+  - "Source: Bloomberg Terminal, 8/15/2025, AAPL US Equity"
+  - "Source: FactSet, 8/20/2025, Consensus Estimates Screen"
+
+# XLSX creation, editing, and analysis
+
+## Overview
+
+A user may ask you to create, edit, or analyze the contents of an .xlsx file. You have different tools and workflows available for different tasks.
+
+## Important Requirements
+
+**LibreOffice Required for Formula Recalculation**: You can assume LibreOffice is installed for recalculating formula values using the `recalc.py` script. The script automatically configures LibreOffice on first run
+
+## Reading and analyzing data
+
+### Data analysis with pandas
+For data analysis, visualization, and basic operations, use **pandas** which provides powerful data manipulation capabilities:
+
+```python
+import pandas as pd
+
+# Read Excel
+df = pd.read_excel('file.xlsx')  # Default: first sheet
+all_sheets = pd.read_excel('file.xlsx', sheet_name=None)  # All sheets as dict
+
+# Analyze
+df.head()      # Preview data
+df.info()      # Column info
+df.describe()  # Statistics
+
+# Write Excel
+df.to_excel('output.xlsx', index=False)
+```
+
+## Excel File Workflows
+
+## CRITICAL: Use Formulas, Not Hardcoded Values
+
+**Always use Excel formulas instead of calculating values in Python and hardcoding them.** This ensures the spreadsheet remains dynamic and updateable.
+
+### ❌ WRONG - Hardcoding Calculated Values
+```python
+# Bad: Calculating in Python and hardcoding result
+total = df['Sales'].sum()
+sheet['B10'] = total  # Hardcodes 5000
+
+# Bad: Computing growth rate in Python
+growth = (df.iloc[-1]['Revenue'] - df.iloc[0]['Revenue']) / df.iloc[0]['Revenue']
+sheet['C5'] = growth  # Hardcodes 0.15
+
+# Bad: Python calculation for average
+avg = sum(values) / len(values)
+sheet['D20'] = avg  # Hardcodes 42.5
+```
+
+### ✅ CORRECT - Using Excel Formulas
+```python
+# Good: Let Excel calculate the sum
+sheet['B10'] = '=SUM(B2:B9)'
+
+# Good: Growth rate as Excel formula
+sheet['C5'] = '=(C4-C2)/C2'
+
+# Good: Average using Excel function
+sheet['D20'] = '=AVERAGE(D2:D19)'
+```
+
+This applies to ALL calculations - totals, percentages, ratios, differences, etc. The spreadsheet should be able to recalculate when source data changes.
+
+## Common Workflow
+1. **Choose tool**: pandas for data, openpyxl for formulas/formatting
+2. **Create/Load**: Create new workbook or load existing file
+3. **Modify**: Add/edit data, formulas, and formatting
+4. **Save**: Write to file
+5. **Recalculate formulas (MANDATORY IF USING FORMULAS)**: Use the recalc.py script
+   ```bash
+   python recalc.py output.xlsx
+   ```
+6. **Verify and fix any errors**: 
+   - The script returns JSON with error details
+   - If `status` is `errors_found`, check `error_summary` for specific error types and locations
+   - Fix the identified errors and recalculate again
+   - Common errors to fix:
+     - `#REF!`: Invalid cell references
+     - `#DIV/0!`: Division by zero
+     - `#VALUE!`: Wrong data type in formula
+     - `#NAME?`: Unrecognized formula name
+
+### Creating new Excel files
+
+```python
+# Using openpyxl for formulas and formatting
+from openpyxl import Workbook
+from openpyxl.styles import Font, PatternFill, Alignment
+
+wb = Workbook()
+sheet = wb.active
+
+# Add data
+sheet['A1'] = 'Hello'
+sheet['B1'] = 'World'
+sheet.append(['Row', 'of', 'data'])
+
+# Add formula
+sheet['B2'] = '=SUM(A1:A10)'
+
+# Formatting
+sheet['A1'].font = Font(bold=True, color='FF0000')
+sheet['A1'].fill = PatternFill('solid', start_color='FFFF00')
+sheet['A1'].alignment = Alignment(horizontal='center')
+
+# Column width
+sheet.column_dimensions['A'].width = 20
+
+wb.save('output.xlsx')
+```
+
+### Editing existing Excel files
+
+```python
+# Using openpyxl to preserve formulas and formatting
+from openpyxl import load_workbook
+
+# Load existing file
+wb = load_workbook('existing.xlsx')
+sheet = wb.active  # or wb['SheetName'] for specific sheet
+
+# Working with multiple sheets
+for sheet_name in wb.sheetnames:
+    sheet = wb[sheet_name]
+    print(f"Sheet: {sheet_name}")
+
+# Modify cells
+sheet['A1'] = 'New Value'
+sheet.insert_rows(2)  # Insert row at position 2
+sheet.delete_cols(3)  # Delete column 3
+
+# Add new sheet
+new_sheet = wb.create_sheet('NewSheet')
+new_sheet['A1'] = 'Data'
+
+wb.save('modified.xlsx')
+```
+
+## Recalculating formulas
+
+Excel files created or modified by openpyxl contain formulas as strings but not calculated values. Use the provided `recalc.py` script to recalculate formulas:
+
+```bash
+python recalc.py <excel_file> [timeout_seconds]
+```
+
+Example:
+```bash
+python recalc.py output.xlsx 30
+```
+
+The script:
+- Automatically sets up LibreOffice macro on first run
+- Recalculates all formulas in all sheets
+- Scans ALL cells for Excel errors (#REF!, #DIV/0!, etc.)
+- Returns JSON with detailed error locations and counts
+- Works on both Linux and macOS
+
+## Formula Verification Checklist
+
+Quick checks to ensure formulas work correctly:
+
+### Essential Verification
+- [ ] **Test 2-3 sample references**: Verify they pull correct values before building full model
+- [ ] **Column mapping**: Confirm Excel columns match (e.g., column 64 = BL, not BK)
+- [ ] **Row offset**: Remember Excel rows are 1-indexed (DataFrame row 5 = Excel row 6)
+
+### Common Pitfalls
+- [ ] **NaN handling**: Check for null values with `pd.notna()`
+- [ ] **Far-right columns**: FY data often in columns 50+ 
+- [ ] **Multiple matches**: Search all occurrences, not just first
+- [ ] **Division by zero**: Check denominators before using `/` in formulas (#DIV/0!)
+- [ ] **Wrong references**: Verify all cell references point to intended cells (#REF!)
+- [ ] **Cross-sheet references**: Use correct format (Sheet1!A1) for linking sheets
+
+### Formula Testing Strategy
+- [ ] **Start small**: Test formulas on 2-3 cells before applying broadly
+- [ ] **Verify dependencies**: Check all cells referenced in formulas exist
+- [ ] **Test edge cases**: Include zero, negative, and very large values
+
+### Interpreting recalc.py Output
+The script returns JSON with error details:
+```json
+{
+  "status": "success",           // or "errors_found"
+  "total_errors": 0,              // Total error count
+  "total_formulas": 42,           // Number of formulas in file
+  "error_summary": {              // Only present if errors found
+    "#REF!": {
+      "count": 2,
+      "locations": ["Sheet1!B5", "Sheet1!C10"]
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+### Library Selection
+- **pandas**: Best for data analysis, bulk operations, and simple data export
+- **openpyxl**: Best for complex formatting, formulas, and Excel-specific features
+
+### Working with openpyxl
+- Cell indices are 1-based (row=1, column=1 refers to cell A1)
+- Use `data_only=True` to read calculated values: `load_workbook('file.xlsx', data_only=True)`
+- **Warning**: If opened with `data_only=True` and saved, formulas are replaced with values and permanently lost
+- For large files: Use `read_only=True` for reading or `write_only=True` for writing
+- Formulas are preserved but not evaluated - use recalc.py to update values
+
+### Working with pandas
+- Specify data types to avoid inference issues: `pd.read_excel('file.xlsx', dtype={'id': str})`
+- For large files, read specific columns: `pd.read_excel('file.xlsx', usecols=['A', 'C', 'E'])`
+- Handle dates properly: `pd.read_excel('file.xlsx', parse_dates=['date_column'])`
+
+## Code Style Guidelines
+**IMPORTANT**: When generating Python code for Excel operations:
+- Write minimal, concise Python code without unnecessary comments
+- Avoid verbose variable names and redundant operations
+- Avoid unnecessary print statements
+
+**For Excel files themselves**:
+- Add comments to cells with complex formulas or important assumptions
+- Document data sources for hardcoded values
+- Include notes for key calculations and model sections