namnam-skills 1.0.3 → 1.0.4

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-18532.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+The sympy repository is not in the current working directory. Based on the issue description and discussion, I understand the fix needed. The `atoms()` method in `sympy/core/basic.py` currently uses `isinstance(expr, Atom)` or `expr.is_Atom` to check for atomic expressions, but it should instead check `not expr.args` to identify leaf nodes in the expression tree.
+
+Based on the GitHub issue discussion, the fix is:
+1. Change the check from `isinstance(expr, Atom)` to `not expr.args` 
+2. Update the docstring accordingly
+3. Update the related test
+
+Let me create the patch based on this understanding:
+
+--- a/sympy/core/basic.py
++++ b/sympy/core/basic.py
+@@ -284,12 +284,12 @@ class Basic(with_metaclass(ManagedProperties)):
+     def atoms(self, *types):
+         """Returns the atoms that form the current object.
+ 
+-        By default, only objects that are truly atomic and can't
++        By default, only objects that are truly atomic and cannot
+         be divided into smaller pieces are returned: symbols, numbers,
+-        and number symbols like I and pi. It is possible to request
+-        atoms of any type, however, as demonstrated below.
++        and number symbols like ``I`` and ``pi``. It is possible to request
++        atoms of any type, however.
+ 
+-        Examples
++        **Examples**
+         ========
+ 
+         >>> from sympy import I, pi, sin
+@@ -303,6 +303,14 @@ class Basic(with_metaclass(ManagedProperties)):
+         >>> (1 + x + 2*sin(y + I*pi)).atoms(Number)
+         {1, 2}
+ 
++        Note that a leaf is defined to be something that has no ``.args``, not
++        just a class that is a subclass of ``Atom``. For example, ``Basic()``
++        has no ``.args`` and is considered a leaf:
++
++        >>> Basic().atoms()
++        {Basic()}
++
++        **Types**
+         >>> (1 + x + 2*sin(y + I*pi)).atoms(Number, NumberSymbol)
+         {1, 2, pi}
+ 
+@@ -313,16 +321,21 @@ class Basic(with_metaclass(ManagedProperties)):
+         >>> (1 + x + 2*sin(y + I*pi)).atoms(Number, NumberSymbol, I)
+         {1, 2, I, pi}
+ 
++        Note that I is a Symbol, not a class:
++
++        >>> I.is_Symbol
++        True
++
+         Be careful to check your assumptions when using the implicit
+         assumption about what atoms are returned:
+ 
+         >>> from sympy import S
+         >>> from sympy.core.function import AppliedUndef
+         >>> class example(Function):
+-                is_real = True
++        ...     is_real = True
++        ...
+         >>> f = example(x)
+-        >>> f.atoms(Symbol)
+-        set()
++        >>> f.atoms(Symbol) == set()
+         True
+ 
+         However, one can always refine the search further:
+@@ -333,10 +346,9 @@ class Basic(with_metaclass(ManagedProperties)):
+         """
+         if types:
+             types = tuple(
+                 [t if isinstance(t, type) else type(t) for t in types])
+-            result = set()
+         else:
+             types = (Atom,)
+         result = set()
+         for expr in preorder_traversal(self):
+-            if isinstance(expr, types):
++            if not expr.args or isinstance(expr, types):
+                 result.add(expr)
+         return result
+
+Wait, I need to reconsider this. Looking at the issue more carefully:
+
+The current code checks `isinstance(expr, Atom)` when no types are specified. The fix should change this to check `not expr.args` instead. Let me look at the exact structure again based on the discussion.
+
+The key insight from the discussion:
+- Current behavior: `atoms()` returns subclasses of `Atom`
+- Desired behavior: `atoms()` returns objects with no `.args` (true leaf nodes)
+
+--- a/sympy/core/basic.py
++++ b/sympy/core/basic.py
+@@ -284,12 +284,12 @@ class Basic(with_metaclass(ManagedProperties)):
+     def atoms(self, *types):
+         """Returns the atoms that form the current object.
+ 
+-        By default, only objects that are truly atomic and can't
++        By default, only objects that are truly atomic and cannot
+         be divided into smaller pieces are returned: symbols, numbers,
+-        and number symbols like I and pi. It is possible to request
+-        atoms of any type, however, as demonstrated below.
++        and number symbols like ``I`` and ``pi``. It is possible to request
++        atoms of any type, however.
+ 
+-        Examples
++        **Examples**
+         ========
+ 
+         >>> from sympy import I, pi, sin
+@@ -340,10 +340,8 @@ class Basic(with_metaclass(ManagedProperties)):
+         if types:
+             types = tuple(
+                 [t if isinstance(t, type) else type(t) for t in types])
+-        else:
+-            types = (Atom,)
+         result = set()
+         for expr in preorder_traversal(self):
+-            if isinstance(expr, types):
++            if not types and not expr.args or types and isinstance(expr, types):
+                 result.add(expr)
+         return result
+--- a/sympy/core/tests/test_basic.py
++++ b/sympy/core/tests/test_basic.py
+@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ def test_atoms():
+     assert b21.atoms() == set()
+ 
+ def test_free_symbols_empty():
+-    assert Basic().atoms() == set()
++    assert Basic().atoms() == {Basic()}

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-18621.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+The file doesn't exist in the current working directory. The user is asking me to generate a patch based on the issue description. Based on the hints provided in the issue, I can generate the patch directly.
+
+Let me produce the patch based on the information provided:
+
+--- a/sympy/matrices/expressions/blockmatrix.py
++++ b/sympy/matrices/expressions/blockmatrix.py
+@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ def blocks(self):
+         data = [[mats[i] if i == j else ZeroMatrix(mats[i].rows, mats[j].cols)
+                         for j in range(len(mats))]
+                         for i in range(len(mats))]
+-        return ImmutableDenseMatrix(data)
++        return ImmutableDenseMatrix(data, evaluate=False)
+ 
+     @property
+     def shape(self):

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-18698.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+Based on the GitHub issue description and the discussion in the comments, I can understand the problem clearly:
+
+1. `sqf_list((x**2 + 1) * (x - 1)**2 * (x - 2)**3 * (x - 3)**3)` returns `(1, [(x**2 + 1, 1), (x - 1, 2), (x - 3, 3), (x - 2, 3)])`
+2. But it should combine factors with the same multiplicity: `(1, [(x**2 + 1, 1), (x - 1, 2), (x**2 - 5*x + 6, 3)])`
+3. The `Poly.sqf_list()` method works correctly
+
+The issue is in the `_symbolic_factor_list` function in `sympy/polys/polytools.py` - it needs to post-process the results to combine factors with the same multiplicity.
+
+Based on the discussion in the issue:
+- The problem is in the `_generic_factor_list` function which is called by `sqf_list`
+- The fix should combine factors with the same multiplicity before returning
+
+Let me create the patch based on the standard sympy code structure:
+
+--- a/sympy/polys/polytools.py
++++ b/sympy/polys/polytools.py
+@@ -6216,6 +6216,18 @@ def _symbolic_factor_list(expr, opt, method):
+         factors.append((_symbolic_factor(g), k))
+ 
+     return coeff, factors
++
++
++def _sorted_factors(factors, method):
++    """Sort and combine factors with same multiplicity for sqf methods."""
++    if method in ('sqf',):
++        # Combine factors with the same multiplicity
++        combined = {}
++        for factor, k in factors:
++            combined[k] = combined.get(k, S.One) * factor
++        factors = [(f, k) for k, f in combined.items()]
++        factors = sorted(factors, key=lambda x: x[1])
++    return factors
+ 
+ 
+ def _factor_list_syms(result, syms):
+@@ -6235,6 +6247,7 @@ def _generic_factor_list(expr, gens, args, method):
+ 
+     try:
+         coeff, factors = _symbolic_factor_list(expr, opt, method)
++        factors = _sorted_factors(factors, method)
+     except PolificationFailed:
+         return S.One, [(expr, 1)]
+
+Wait, I need to look more carefully at the actual code structure. Let me search for more information about how the sympy sqf_list function is structured based on the issue discussion:
+
+Looking at the issue discussion more carefully:
+- The key insight from @jksuom is: "it is necessary to post-process the result... the two threefold factors `x - 3` and `x - 2` should be combined to give a single `(x**2 - 5*x + 6, 3)`"
+- The function `_generic_factor_list` is at the core of the issue
+- The `Poly.sqf_list()` method works correctly
+
+The fix needs to be in the post-processing step of `_generic_factor_list` specifically for the 'sqf' method to combine factors with the same multiplicity.
+
+--- a/sympy/polys/polytools.py
++++ b/sympy/polys/polytools.py
+@@ -6213,7 +6213,19 @@ def _symbolic_factor_list(expr, opt, method):
+     for factor, k in factors:
+         if factor.is_Number:
+             coeff *= factor**k
+         else:
+             factors.append((_symbolic_factor(g), k))
+ 
+     return coeff, factors
++
++
++def _sorted_factors(factors, method):
++    """Sort factors list and combine factors with same multiplicity for sqf."""
++    if method == 'sqf':
++        # Combine factors with the same multiplicity
++        from collections import defaultdict
++        combined = defaultdict(lambda: S.One)
++        for factor, k in factors:
++            combined[k] *= factor
++        factors = sorted(combined.items(), key=lambda x: x[0])
++        factors = [(f, k) for k, f in factors]
++    return factors
+
+Based on my understanding of the issue and the sympy codebase structure, here is the patch:
+
+--- a/sympy/polys/polytools.py
++++ b/sympy/polys/polytools.py
+@@ -6213,6 +6213,17 @@ def _symbolic_factor_list(expr, opt, method):
+ 
+     return coeff, factors
+ 
++
++def _sorted_factors(factors, method):
++    """Sort factors list and combine factors with same multiplicity for sqf."""
++    if method == 'sqf':
++        # Combine factors with the same multiplicity
++        from collections import defaultdict
++        combined = defaultdict(lambda: S.One)
++        for factor, k in factors:
++            combined[k] *= factor
++        factors = [(combined[k], k) for k in sorted(combined.keys())]
++    return factors
+ 
+ def _factor_list_syms(result, syms):
+     """Return a list of factors from a symbolic factorization."""
+@@ -6230,6 +6241,7 @@ def _generic_factor_list(expr, gens, args, method):
+ 
+     try:
+         coeff, factors = _symbolic_factor_list(expr, opt, method)
++        factors = _sorted_factors(factors, method)
+     except PolificationFailed:
+         return S.One, [(expr, 1)]

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-18835.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+Based on the GitHub issue, I can see this is about the `uniq` function in `sympy/utilities/iterables.py`. The issue mentions lines 2109-2124. Let me create a patch based on the problem description.
+
+The issue is that when iterating over `uniq(f)` and modifying the list `f` simultaneously, the output is silently wrong. The fix should check if the size of a mutable sequence changes during iteration and raise a `RuntimeError` similar to what Python does with dictionaries/sets.
+
+Based on the issue description and standard Python patterns for `uniq` functions, here's the patch:
+
+--- a/sympy/utilities/iterables.py
++++ b/sympy/utilities/iterables.py
+@@ -2106,6 +2106,7 @@ def uniq(seq, result=None):
+     >>> list(googol)
+     []
+     """
++    initial_len = None
+     try:
+         seen = set()
+         result = result or []
+@@ -2113,6 +2114,12 @@ def uniq(seq, result=None):
+             if item not in seen:
+                 seen.add(item)
+                 result.append(item)
++                if initial_len is None:
++                    try:
++                        initial_len = len(seq)
++                    except TypeError:
++                        pass
++                if initial_len is not None and len(seq) != initial_len:
++                    raise RuntimeError("dictionary changed size during iteration")
+                 yield item
+     except TypeError:
+         if item not in result:

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-19007.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+--- a/sympy/matrices/expressions/blockmatrix.py
++++ b/sympy/matrices/expressions/blockmatrix.py
+@@ -232,19 +232,33 @@ class BlockMatrix(BlockDiagMatrix):
+ 
+     def _entry(self, i, j, **kwargs):
+-        from sympy import floor
++        from sympy.functions.elementary.piecewise import Piecewise
++        from sympy.core.numbers import Integer
++        from sympy.core.logic import fuzzy_not
++
++        # First, check if all block dimensions are concrete integers
+         rowblocksizes = self.rowblocksizes
+         colblocksizes = self.colblocksizes
+ 
+-        row_block = 0
+-        col_block = 0
+-        cumul_row = 0
+-        cumul_col = 0
+-        for i_sum in rowblocksizes:
+-            if i < cumul_row + i_sum:
+-                break
+-            cumul_row += i_sum
+-            row_block += 1
+-        for j_sum in colblocksizes:
+-            if j < cumul_col + j_sum:
+-                break
+-            cumul_col += j_sum
+-            col_block += 1
++        # Calculate cumulative offsets
++        row_offset = 0
++        for row_block, row_size in enumerate(rowblocksizes):
++            # Check if i < row_offset + row_size is definitely true
++            if (i - row_offset).is_nonnegative is False:
++                # i < row_offset, went too far (shouldn't happen normally)
++                from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
++                return MatrixElement(self, i, j)
++            if (i - row_offset - row_size).is_nonnegative is False:
++                # i < row_offset + row_size, found the right block
++                break
++            elif (i - row_offset - row_size).is_nonnegative is None:
++                # Can't determine, return unevaluated
++                from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
++                return MatrixElement(self, i, j)
++            row_offset += row_size
++        else:
++            # Ran off the end
++            from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
++            return MatrixElement(self, i, j)
+ 
+-        return self.blocks[row_block, col_block][i - cumul_row, j - cumul_col]
++        col_offset = 0
++        for col_block, col_size in enumerate(colblocksizes):
++            if (j - col_offset).is_nonnegative is False:
++                from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
++                return MatrixElement(self, i, j)
++            if (j - col_offset - col_size).is_nonnegative is False:
++                break
++            elif (j - col_offset - col_size).is_nonnegative is None:
++                from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
++                return MatrixElement(self, i, j)
++            col_offset += col_size
++        else:
++            from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
++            return MatrixElement(self, i, j)
++
++        return self.blocks[row_block, col_block][i - row_offset, j - col_offset]

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-19254.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+Based on my knowledge of the sympy codebase, I can provide the patch for replacing the Mignotte bound with the Knuth-Cohen bound. The Knuth-Cohen bound is a tighter bound that improves the efficiency of polynomial factorization.
+
+Here's the patch:
+
+--- a/sympy/polys/factortools.py
++++ b/sympy/polys/factortools.py
+@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ from sympy.polys.densebasic import (
+     dmp_degree_in,
+     dmp_to_dict,
+     dmp_from_dict,
+-    dmp_ground_LC, dmp_ground_TC,
++    dmp_ground_LC, dmp_ground_TC, dmp_max_norm,
+     dmp_ground_nth,
+     dmp_one, dmp_ground,
+     dmp_zeros)
+@@ -119,33 +119,38 @@ def dmp_trial_division(f, factors, u, K):
+ 
+ 
+ def dup_zz_mignotte_bound(f, K):
+-    """Mignotte bound for univariate polynomials in `K[x]`. """
+-    a = dup_max_norm(f, K)
+-    b = abs(dup_LC(f, K))
++    """
++    The Knuth-Cohen upper bound for the coefficients of a factor of a
++    polynomial in `K[x]`.
++
++    This is used in polynomial factorization as a bound for the
++    coefficients of factors.
++
++    References
++    ==========
++
++    .. [1] Algorithm 15.4, p.423 of [Geddes1992]
++
++    """
+     n = dup_degree(f)
+-    return K.sqrt(K(n + 1))*2**n*a*b
++    return K.sqrt(K(2)**(2*n) * sum(c**2 for c in f))
+ 
+ 
+ def dmp_zz_mignotte_bound(f, u, K):
+-    """Mignotte bound for multivariate polynomials in `K[X]`. """
+-    a = dmp_max_norm(f, u, K)
+-    b = abs(dmp_ground_LC(f, u, K))
+-    n = sum(dmp_degree_list(f, u))
+-    return K.sqrt(K(n + 1))*2**n*a*b
++    """
++    The Knuth-Cohen upper bound for the coefficients of a factor of a
++    polynomial in `K[X]`.
+ 
++    This is used in polynomial factorization as a bound for the
++    coefficients of factors.
+ 
+-def dup_zz_hensel_step(m, f, g, h, s, t, K):
+-    """
+-    One step in Hensel lifting in `Z[x]`.
++    References
++    ==========
+ 
+-    Given positive integer `m` and `Z[x]` polynomials `f`, `g`, `h`, `s`
+-    and `t` such that::
++    .. [1] Algorithm 15.4, p.423 of [Geddes1992]
+ 
+-        f = g*h (mod m)
+-        s*g + t*h = 1 (mod m)
+-
+-        lc(f) is not a zero divisor (mod m)
+-        lc(h) = 1
++    """
++    a = dmp_max_norm(f, u, K)
++    n = sum(dmp_degree_list(f, u))
++    return K.sqrt(K(2)**(2*n) * (n + 1)) * a

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-19487.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+Based on my knowledge of the sympy codebase and the issue description, I can provide the patch to add the `_eval_rewrite_as_Abs` method to the `sign` class. The issue asks for `sign(x).rewrite(Abs)` to return a `Piecewise` expression that handles the zero case properly.
+
+Let me create the patch based on the standard sympy code structure:
+
+--- a/sympy/functions/elementary/complexes.py
++++ b/sympy/functions/elementary/complexes.py
+@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
+ from sympy.core.logic import fuzzy_bool, fuzzy_not
+ from sympy.core.mul import Mul
+ from sympy.core.relational import Eq
++from sympy.functions.elementary.piecewise import Piecewise
+ 
+ ###############################################################################
+ ######################### REAL and IMAGINARY PARTS ############################
+@@ -391,6 +392,12 @@ def _eval_rewrite_as_Heaviside(self, arg, **kwargs):
+             return Heaviside(arg, H0=S(1)/2) * 2 - 1
+         return Heaviside(arg, H0=S.Half) - Heaviside(-arg, H0=S.Half)
+ 
++    def _eval_rewrite_as_Abs(self, arg, **kwargs):
++        return Piecewise((0, Eq(arg, 0)), (arg / Abs(arg), True))
++
+     def _eval_simplify(self, **kwargs):
+         return self.func(factor_terms(self.args[0]))  # XXX include doit?

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-20049.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+Based on my knowledge of the SymPy codebase and the issue description, I can provide the patch. The issue is that `Point.vel()` should automatically calculate velocity from position information if velocity hasn't been explicitly defined, similar to how `ReferenceFrame.ang_vel_in()` works.
+
+The key insight from the issue:
+1. When you call `Q.set_pos(P, r)` to set position of Q relative to P as vector `r`
+2. Then `Q.vel(A)` should calculate velocity by taking the time derivative of `r` in frame A (i.e., `r.dt(A)`)
+3. This mirrors how `ang_vel_in()` calculates angular velocity from orientation
+
+Here's the patch that implements this fix:
+
+--- a/sympy/physics/vector/point.py
++++ b/sympy/physics/vector/point.py
+@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
+ from __future__ import print_function, division
+ from .vector import Vector, _check_vector
+ from .frame import _check_frame
++from warnings import warn
+ 
+ __all__ = ['Point']
+ 
+@@ -515,9 +516,56 @@ class Point(object):
+         Examples
+         ========
+ 
+-        >>> from sympy.physics.vector import Point, ReferenceFrame
++        >>> from sympy.physics.vector import Point, ReferenceFrame, dynamicsymbols
+         >>> N = ReferenceFrame('N')
+         >>> p1 = Point('p1')
+-        >>> p1.set_vel(N, 10 * N.x)
++        >>> p2 = Point('p2')
++        >>> q = dynamicsymbols('q')
++        >>> p1.set_vel(N, 10 * N.x)
++        >>> p2.set_pos(p1, q * N.y)
+         >>> p1.vel(N)
+         10*N.x
++        >>> p2.vel(N)
++        q'*N.y
+ 
+         """
+ 
+         _check_frame(frame)
+-        if not (frame in self._vel_dict):
+-            raise ValueError('Velocity of point ' + self.name + ' has not been'
+-                             ' defined in ReferenceFrame ' + frame.name)
+-        return self._vel_dict[frame]
++        if frame in self._vel_dict:
++            return self._vel_dict[frame]
++        else:
++            # Try to calculate velocity from position information
++            visited = set()
++            queue = [self]
++            while queue:
++                node = queue.pop(0)
++                if node in visited:
++                    continue
++                visited.add(node)
++                # Check if node has velocity defined in frame
++                if frame in node._vel_dict:
++                    # Calculate velocity by going backwards through position tree
++                    path = self._pdict_path(node)
++                    if path is not None:
++                        vel = node._vel_dict[frame]
++                        for i in range(len(path) - 1, 0, -1):
++                            # Get position of path[i-1] from path[i]
++                            pos_vec = path[i-1].pos_from(path[i])
++                            # Velocity contribution from this position vector
++                            vel = vel + pos_vec.dt(frame)
++                        return vel
++                # Add neighbors (points with position defined relative to node)
++                for other_point in node._pos_dict.keys():
++                    if other_point not in visited:
++                        queue.append(other_point)
++            raise ValueError('Velocity of point ' + self.name + ' has not been'
++                             ' defined in ReferenceFrame ' + frame.name)
++
++    def _pdict_path(self, other):
++        """Returns a list of points that connect self to other.
++
++        The list will start with self and end with other.
++        Returns None if no path exists.
++        """
++        # BFS to find path from self to other via _pos_dict
++        from collections import deque
++        queue = deque([(self, [self])])
++        visited = {self}
++        while queue:
++            node, path = queue.popleft()
++            if node == other:
++                return path
++            for neighbor in node._pos_dict.keys():
++                if neighbor not in visited:
++                    visited.add(neighbor)
++                    queue.append((neighbor, path + [neighbor]))
++        return None
+
+Wait, let me reconsider. Looking at the actual SymPy codebase structure more carefully based on the issue and hints, the fix should be simpler and follow the pattern used in `ang_vel_in()`. Let me provide a cleaner patch:
+
+--- a/sympy/physics/vector/point.py
++++ b/sympy/physics/vector/point.py
+@@ -519,8 +519,26 @@ class Point(object):
+         """
+ 
+         _check_frame(frame)
+-        if not (frame in self._vel_dict):
+-            raise ValueError('Velocity of point ' + self.name + ' has not been'
+-                             ' defined in ReferenceFrame ' + frame.name)
+-        return self._vel_dict[frame]
++        if frame in self._vel_dict:
++            return self._vel_dict[frame]
++        else:
++            # Try to calculate velocity from position information
++            # by finding a point with known velocity and using the
++            # time derivative of the position vector
++            visited = []
++            queue = [self]
++            while queue:
++                node = queue.pop(0)
++                if node not in visited:
++                    visited.append(node)
++                    if frame in node._vel_dict:
++                        return node._vel_dict[frame] + self.pos_from(node).dt(frame)
++                    for neighbor in node._pos_dict:
++                        if neighbor not in visited:
++                            queue.append(neighbor)
++            raise ValueError('Velocity of point ' + self.name + ' has not been'
++                             ' defined in ReferenceFrame ' + frame.name)

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-20154.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+Based on my knowledge of the SymPy codebase and the issue described, I need to create a patch for the `partitions()` function in `sympy/utilities/iterables.py`. The function reuses the same dictionary object and yields it on each iteration, which causes bugs when users try to collect results (e.g., `list(partitions(n))`).
+
+The fix is to yield a copy of the dictionary instead of the dictionary itself. Here's the patch:
+
+--- a/sympy/utilities/iterables.py
++++ b/sympy/utilities/iterables.py
+@@ -1738,28 +1738,6 @@ def partitions(n, m=None, k=None, size=False):
+ 
+     {2: 1, 1: 2}
+     {1: 4}
+-
+-    Note that the _same_ dictionary object is returned each time.
+-    This is for speed:  generating each partition goes quickly,
+-    taking constant time, independent of n.
+-
+-    >>> [p for p in partitions(6, k=2)]
+-    [{1: 6}, {1: 6}, {1: 6}, {1: 6}]
+-
+-    If you want to build a list of the returned dictionaries then
+-    make a copy of them:
+-
+-    >>> [p.copy() for p in partitions(6, k=2)]  # doctest: +SKIP
+-    [{2: 3}, {1: 2, 2: 2}, {1: 4, 2: 1}, {1: 6}]
+-    >>> [(M, p.copy()) for M, p in partitions(6, k=2, size=True)]  # doctest: +SKIP
+-    [(3, {2: 3}), (4, {1: 2, 2: 2}), (5, {1: 4, 2: 1}), (6, {1: 6})]
+-
+-    Reference:
+-    Modified from Tim Peter's version to allow for k and m values:
+-    http://code.activestate.com/recipes/218332-generator-for-integer-partitions/
+-
+-    See Also
+     ========
+     sympy.combinatorics.partitions.Partition
+     sympy.combinatorics.partitions.IntegerPartition
+@@ -1793,9 +1771,9 @@ def partitions(n, m=None, k=None, size=False):
+     keys.append(r)
+     while keys:
+         if size:
+-            yield sum(ms.values()), ms
++            yield sum(ms.values()), ms.copy()
+         else:
+-            yield ms
++            yield ms.copy()
+ 
+         # Reuse any 1's.
+         if keys[-1] == 1:

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-20212.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+Based on my knowledge of the sympy codebase, I can create the patch. In sympy 1.5.x, the issue is in `sympy/core/power.py` where the `Pow.__new__` method handles special cases. The code incorrectly returns `S.Zero` for `0**-oo` when it should return `S.ComplexInfinity` (zoo).
+
+Looking at the sympy 1.5 source code structure, the relevant section is in the `Pow.__new__` method where it handles the case when `b is S.Zero`. The current code checks for negative exponents but doesn't properly handle the case of `-oo`.
+
+Here is the patch:
+
+--- a/sympy/core/power.py
++++ b/sympy/core/power.py
+@@ -264,6 +264,8 @@ class Pow(Expr):
+                     return S.ComplexInfinity
+                 if e.is_Rational and e.is_negative:
+                     return S.ComplexInfinity
++                if e is S.NegativeInfinity:
++                    return S.ComplexInfinity
+             if e.is_positive:
+                 return S.Zero
+             if e.is_negative:

package/src/templates/antigravity-skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-20322.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+Based on the issue description and the suggested fix from the GitHub discussion, I have enough information to create the patch. The solution is to modify the `fraction` function in `sympy/simplify/radsimp.py` to recurse into nested Mul expressions.
+
+The fix adds a helper function `mul_args` that recursively yields arguments from nested Mul expressions, which allows `fraction` to correctly handle unevaluated nested Mul expressions like `Mul(-1, Mul(1, Pow(2, -1, evaluate=False), evaluate=False), evaluate=False)`.
+
+Here's the patch:
+
+--- a/sympy/simplify/radsimp.py
++++ b/sympy/simplify/radsimp.py
+@@ -1071,7 +1071,14 @@ def fraction(expr, exact=False):
+ 
+     numer, denom = [], []
+ 
+-    for term in Mul.make_args(expr):
++    def mul_args(e):
++        for term in Mul.make_args(e):
++            if term.is_Mul:
++                yield from mul_args(term)
++            else:
++                yield term
++
++    for term in mul_args(expr):
+         if term.is_commutative and (term.is_Pow or isinstance(term, exp)):
+             b, ex = term.as_base_exp()
+             if ex.is_negative: