musubi-sdd 0.1.0

package/src/templates/shared/documents/research.md

@@ -0,0 +1,494 @@
+# Research Report: {{TOPIC}}
+
+**Project**: {{PROJECT_NAME}}
+**Version**: 1.0
+**Status**: Draft
+**Date**: {{DATE}}
+**Researcher**: {{AUTHOR}}
+
+---
+
+## Document Control
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
+|---------|------|--------|---------|
+| 1.0 | {{DATE}} | {{AUTHOR}} | Initial research |
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+[2-3 paragraph summary of research findings and recommendation]
+
+**Key Findings**:
+- [Finding 1]
+- [Finding 2]
+- [Finding 3]
+
+**Recommendation**: [Primary recommendation with brief justification]
+
+---
+
+## Research Questions
+
+### Primary Question
+
+[Main question this research aims to answer]
+
+### Secondary Questions
+
+1. [Question 1]
+2. [Question 2]
+3. [Question 3]
+
+---
+
+## Background
+
+### Context
+
+[Project context and why this research is needed]
+
+**Steering Context**:
+- **Product Goals**: [Reference to steering/product.md]
+- **Architecture Patterns**: [Reference to steering/structure.md]
+- **Current Tech Stack**: [Reference to steering/tech.md]
+
+### Scope
+
+**In Scope**:
+- [Topic 1]
+- [Topic 2]
+
+**Out of Scope**:
+- [Topic 1]
+- [Topic 2]
+
+---
+
+## Methodology
+
+### Research Approach
+
+[How the research was conducted]
+
+**Methods Used**:
+- [ ] Literature review (documentation, blog posts, papers)
+- [ ] Code analysis (existing codebase, open-source examples)
+- [ ] Prototyping/proof of concept
+- [ ] Expert consultation (team members, community)
+- [ ] Benchmark testing
+- [ ] Market analysis
+
+### Evaluation Criteria
+
+| Criterion | Weight | Description |
+|-----------|--------|-------------|
+| Technical Fit | 30% | Alignment with tech stack and architecture |
+| Developer Experience | 20% | Ease of use, learning curve |
+| Performance | 15% | Speed, resource usage |
+| Community Support | 15% | Documentation, ecosystem, maturity |
+| Cost | 10% | Licensing, hosting, maintenance |
+| Security | 10% | Vulnerabilities, update frequency |
+
+**Total**: 100%
+
+---
+
+## Options Analyzed
+
+### Option 1: [Name]
+
+**Description**: [Brief description of the option]
+
+**Website**: [URL]
+**License**: [e.g., MIT, Apache 2.0, Proprietary]
+**Version**: [Current stable version]
+**Maturity**: [Mature/Stable/Beta/Alpha]
+
+#### Pros
+
+- ✅ [Advantage 1]
+- ✅ [Advantage 2]
+- ✅ [Advantage 3]
+
+#### Cons
+
+- ❌ [Disadvantage 1]
+- ❌ [Disadvantage 2]
+- ❌ [Disadvantage 3]
+
+#### Technical Details
+
+**Language/Framework**: [e.g., TypeScript, Python, Go]
+**Dependencies**: [Major dependencies]
+**Integration**: [How it integrates with existing stack]
+
+**Example Usage**:
+```typescript
+// Code example showing how to use this option
+import { Feature } from 'option1';
+
+const feature = new Feature({
+  config: 'value'
+});
+
+const result = await feature.execute();
+```
+
+#### Evaluation Scores
+
+| Criterion | Score (1-10) | Weight | Weighted Score | Notes |
+|-----------|--------------|--------|----------------|-------|
+| Technical Fit | [N] | 30% | [N×0.3] | [Notes] |
+| Developer Experience | [N] | 20% | [N×0.2] | [Notes] |
+| Performance | [N] | 15% | [N×0.15] | [Notes] |
+| Community Support | [N] | 15% | [N×0.15] | [Notes] |
+| Cost | [N] | 10% | [N×0.1] | [Notes] |
+| Security | [N] | 10% | [N×0.1] | [Notes] |
+| **Total** | - | 100% | **[Sum]** | - |
+
+#### Community Metrics
+
+- **GitHub Stars**: [N]
+- **NPM Downloads**: [N/week or N/month]
+- **Contributors**: [N]
+- **Last Release**: [Date]
+- **Open Issues**: [N]
+- **Documentation Quality**: [Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor]
+
+#### Use Cases
+
+**Best For**:
+- [Use case 1]
+- [Use case 2]
+
+**Not Suitable For**:
+- [Use case 1]
+- [Use case 2]
+
+---
+
+### Option 2: [Name]
+
+[Repeat the same structure as Option 1]
+
+**Description**: [Brief description]
+
+**Website**: [URL]
+**License**: [License]
+**Version**: [Version]
+**Maturity**: [Maturity level]
+
+#### Pros
+
+- ✅ [Advantage 1]
+- ✅ [Advantage 2]
+
+#### Cons
+
+- ❌ [Disadvantage 1]
+- ❌ [Disadvantage 2]
+
+#### Technical Details
+
+[Same structure as Option 1]
+
+#### Evaluation Scores
+
+[Same table as Option 1]
+
+#### Community Metrics
+
+[Same structure as Option 1]
+
+---
+
+### Option 3: [Name]
+
+[Repeat structure]
+
+---
+
+## Comparison Matrix
+
+| Feature/Criterion | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 | Winner |
+|-------------------|----------|----------|----------|--------|
+| **Technical Fit** | 8/10 | 7/10 | 9/10 | Option 3 |
+| **Developer Experience** | 9/10 | 6/10 | 7/10 | Option 1 |
+| **Performance** | 7/10 | 9/10 | 8/10 | Option 2 |
+| **Community Support** | 9/10 | 7/10 | 6/10 | Option 1 |
+| **Cost** | 10/10 (free) | 8/10 | 10/10 (free) | Option 1, 3 |
+| **Security** | 8/10 | 7/10 | 9/10 | Option 3 |
+| **Weighted Total** | **8.3** | **7.5** | **8.0** | **Option 1** |
+
+---
+
+## Feature Comparison
+
+| Feature | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 | Required? |
+|---------|----------|----------|----------|-----------|
+| [Feature 1] | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | Yes |
+| [Feature 2] | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | Yes |
+| [Feature 3] | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | No |
+| [Feature 4] | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Yes |
+| [Feature 5] | Partial | ✅ | ✅ | No |
+
+**Legend**: ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported | Partial = Limited support
+
+---
+
+## Performance Benchmarks
+
+### Benchmark Setup
+
+**Environment**:
+- CPU: [e.g., Intel i7, Apple M1]
+- RAM: [e.g., 16GB]
+- OS: [e.g., macOS, Ubuntu 22.04]
+- Node.js: [e.g., v20.10.0]
+
+**Test Scenario**: [Description of what was tested]
+
+### Results
+
+| Metric | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 | Winner |
+|--------|----------|----------|----------|--------|
+| **Throughput** (ops/sec) | 10,000 | 15,000 | 12,000 | Option 2 |
+| **Latency** (ms, p95) | 50 | 30 | 40 | Option 2 |
+| **Memory** (MB) | 150 | 200 | 120 | Option 3 |
+| **Bundle Size** (KB) | 80 | 120 | 60 | Option 3 |
+| **Startup Time** (ms) | 200 | 300 | 150 | Option 3 |
+
+**Benchmark Code**:
+```typescript
+// Code used for benchmarking
+import Benchmark from 'benchmark';
+
+const suite = new Benchmark.Suite();
+
+suite
+  .add('Option 1', () => {
+    // Test code
+  })
+  .add('Option 2', () => {
+    // Test code
+  })
+  .on('complete', function() {
+    console.log('Fastest is ' + this.filter('fastest').map('name'));
+  })
+  .run();
+```
+
+---
+
+## Proof of Concept
+
+### Option 1 POC
+
+**Goal**: [What the POC aimed to prove]
+
+**Implementation**:
+```typescript
+// Proof of concept code
+```
+
+**Results**:
+- ✅ [Success criterion 1]
+- ✅ [Success criterion 2]
+- ❌ [Failed criterion 1]
+
+**Time Investment**: [X hours]
+**Verdict**: [Pass/Fail/Partial]
+
+---
+
+### Option 2 POC
+
+[Same structure]
+
+---
+
+## Risk Analysis
+
+### Option 1 Risks
+
+| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
+|------|-------------|--------|------------|
+| [Risk 1] | High/Medium/Low | High/Medium/Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
+| [Risk 2] | High/Medium/Low | High/Medium/Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
+
+### Option 2 Risks
+
+[Same structure]
+
+---
+
+## Migration Considerations
+
+### For Option 1
+
+**If we choose Option 1, migration path**:
+
+**Current State**: [Description of current implementation]
+**Target State**: [Description after migration]
+
+**Migration Steps**:
+1. [Step 1]
+2. [Step 2]
+3. [Step 3]
+
+**Estimated Effort**: [X hours/days]
+**Rollback Plan**: [How to revert if issues occur]
+
+---
+
+## Cost Analysis
+
+| Cost Factor | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 |
+|-------------|----------|----------|----------|
+| **License Cost** | Free (MIT) | $X/month | Free (Apache) |
+| **Infrastructure** | $X/month | $Y/month | $Z/month |
+| **Development Time** | X hours | Y hours | Z hours |
+| **Maintenance** (annual) | X hours | Y hours | Z hours |
+| **Training** | Low | Medium | Low |
+| **Total 1st Year** | **$X** | **$Y** | **$Z** |
+
+---
+
+## Team Feedback
+
+### Developer Survey
+
+**Respondents**: [N team members]
+
+**Question**: Which option do you prefer?
+- Option 1: [N votes] ([%]%)
+- Option 2: [N votes] ([%]%)
+- Option 3: [N votes] ([%]%)
+
+**Comments**:
+- "[Developer 1 comment]"
+- "[Developer 2 comment]"
+
+---
+
+## Recommendation
+
+### Primary Recommendation: [Option X]
+
+**Rationale**:
+1. [Reason 1 - e.g., Highest weighted score (8.3/10)]
+2. [Reason 2 - e.g., Best developer experience]
+3. [Reason 3 - e.g., Strong community support]
+4. [Reason 4 - e.g., Aligns with steering context]
+
+**Trade-offs Accepted**:
+- [Trade-off 1 - e.g., Slightly slower than Option 2]
+- [Trade-off 2 - e.g., Smaller community than Option 1]
+
+**Decision Confidence**: [High/Medium/Low]
+
+---
+
+### Alternative Recommendation: [Option Y]
+
+**When to Use Instead**:
+- If [condition 1 - e.g., performance is critical]
+- If [condition 2 - e.g., budget is constrained]
+
+---
+
+## Next Steps
+
+### Immediate Actions
+
+1. [ ] **Stakeholder Review**: Present findings to [stakeholders]
+2. [ ] **Decision**: Get approval on [recommended option]
+3. [ ] **Spike**: Run 1-week spike to validate integration
+4. [ ] **Requirements**: Create requirements document
+5. [ ] **Design**: Create technical design document
+
+### Timeline
+
+| Phase | Duration | Deadline |
+|-------|----------|----------|
+| Research Review | 2 days | {{DATE}} |
+| Decision | 1 day | {{DATE}} |
+| Validation Spike | 1 week | {{DATE}} |
+| Requirements | 3 days | {{DATE}} |
+| Design | 1 week | {{DATE}} |
+
+---
+
+## References
+
+### Documentation
+
+- [Option 1 Docs]: [URL]
+- [Option 2 Docs]: [URL]
+- [Option 3 Docs]: [URL]
+
+### Articles & Blog Posts
+
+- [Title 1]: [URL]
+- [Title 2]: [URL]
+
+### Code Examples
+
+- [Example 1]: [GitHub URL]
+- [Example 2]: [GitHub URL]
+
+### Community Discussions
+
+- [Discussion 1]: [URL]
+- [Discussion 2]: [URL]
+
+---
+
+## Appendix A: Detailed Benchmarks
+
+[Include raw benchmark data, graphs, charts]
+
+---
+
+## Appendix B: Code Samples
+
+### Option 1 Complete Example
+
+```typescript
+// Complete working example
+```
+
+### Option 2 Complete Example
+
+```typescript
+// Complete working example
+```
+
+---
+
+## Appendix C: Decision Framework
+
+This research follows the decision framework from `steering/rules/workflow.md` Stage 1 (Research).
+
+**Quality Gates**:
+- ✅ Research questions answered
+- ✅ Minimum 2 options evaluated
+- ✅ Recommendations justified
+- ✅ Stakeholders can review
+
+**Constitutional Compliance**:
+- ✅ **Article VI**: Consulted steering context (structure.md, tech.md, product.md)
+
+---
+
+## Document History
+
+### Version 1.1 (Future)
+- [Planned update 1]
+- [Planned update 2]
+
+---
+
+**Powered by MUSUBI** - Specification Driven Development