lazycodex-ai 5.1.45 → 5.1.46

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/ulw-research/scripts/cli-support.test.ts

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 import { describe, expect, onTestFinished, test } from "bun:test"
-import { mkdtempSync, readdirSync, readFileSync, rmSync, writeFileSync } from "node:fs"
+import { mkdirSync, mkdtempSync, readdirSync, readFileSync, rmSync, writeFileSync } from "node:fs"
 import { tmpdir } from "node:os"
 import { join } from "node:path"
 import { pathToFileURL } from "node:url"
 
-import { CliError, exitCodeFor, parseArgs, readJsonFile, writeJsonAtomic } from "./cli-support.mjs"
+import { CliError, exitCodeFor, parseArgs, readJsonFile, writeJsonAtomic, writeTextAtomic } from "./cli-support.mjs"
 import { isCliEntry } from "./entry-guard.mjs"
 
 function tempDir() {
@@ -65,6 +65,17 @@ describe("JSON files", () => {
 		expect(leftovers).toEqual([])
 	})
 
+	test("#given a target the rename cannot replace #when written atomically #then the write throws and no temp file is left", () => {
+		// given: a non-empty directory where the file should go
+		const dir = tempDir()
+		const target = join(dir, "calibration.jsonl")
+		mkdirSync(target)
+		writeFileSync(join(target, "keep"), "x")
+		// when / then
+		expect(() => writeTextAtomic(target, "line\n")).toThrow()
+		expect(readdirSync(dir)).toEqual(["calibration.jsonl"])
+	})
+
 	test("#given a missing or malformed file #when read #then a CliError names the path", () => {
 		const dir = tempDir()
 		expect(() => readJsonFile(join(dir, "missing.json"))).toThrow(CliError)

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/ulw-research/scripts/contracts.mjs

@@ -6,6 +6,16 @@
 
 export const SCHEMA_VERSION = 1
 
+/** The severity vocabulary in rank order; every DEFECT_CODES entry uses one of these. */
+export const SEVERITIES = Object.freeze(["blocker", "major", "minor"])
+
+/** Defect counts per severity, then total. */
+export function countDefects(defects) {
+	const counts = Object.fromEntries(SEVERITIES.map((severity) => [severity, 0]))
+	for (const defect of defects) counts[defect.severity] += 1
+	return { ...counts, total: defects.length }
+}
+
 function deepFreeze(value) {
 	if (value === null || typeof value !== "object") return value
 	for (const key of Object.keys(value)) deepFreeze(value[key])
@@ -48,7 +58,7 @@ export const DEFECT_CODES = deepFreeze({
 	pointer_label_mismatch: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The placeholder's label is not the row's label; check the id, then the label." },
 	quote_anchor_unresolved: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "A from or to anchor is missing or occurs more than once in the quote; pick unique anchor words." },
 	unit_duplicated: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The unit after the placeholder repeats the row's unit; use :value or remove the unit." },
-	polish_diff_fail: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The polish pass changed numbers, tickers, or table rows; revert to the pre-polish artifact and apply the language fixes only." },
+	polish_diff_fail: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The polish pass changed numbers, tickers, table rows, claim ids, markup, or hidden content; revert to the pre-polish artifact and apply the language fixes only." },
 	fidelity_interview_incomplete: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "A fidelity field is pending or missing in brief.md; answer the open question or record its default, then rerun." },
 	derived_not_allowed: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The brief allows no derived or assumed numbers; cite a source row directly or change the brief with the requester." },
 	source_outside_floor: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The row's source is outside the source floor the brief records; use a source the brief allows or remove the fact." },
@@ -57,7 +67,8 @@ export const DEFECT_CODES = deepFreeze({
 	quote_unbound: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "A direct quotation has no ledger quote row; register it with fact quote and insert it through its placeholder." },
 	edition_unverified: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The delivered file has no matching fact verify record; run fact verify on that edition and record it with --verified-by." },
 	untraceable_number: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "Replace the typed number with a {{F<n>}} placeholder backed by a ledger row, or register it as assumed with a rationale." },
-	unsupported_verification: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The sentence claims a tool check that no recorded command output backs; link the recorded output row or remove the claim." },
+	unsupported_verification: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "A sentence marked verified (data-claim-kind=\"verified\") cites a row that is not recorded command output; cite the recorded output row or drop the verified mark." },
+	claim_kind_mismatch: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "An element marked with a claim kind (data-claim-kind) cites a row that kind does not accept, or the kind is unknown; cite a row of that kind or fix the mark (references/fidelity-claim-kinds.md)." },
 	conflicting_readings: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "Two ledger rows with different periods or qualifiers are cited as one fact; split the sentence or retire one row." },
 	hedge_dropped: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "Restore the qualifier the source uses (estimated, about, not yet)." },
 	direction_flipped: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The source states the opposite direction; rewrite from the quote." },
@@ -65,7 +76,8 @@ export const DEFECT_CODES = deepFreeze({
 	qualifier_dropped: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The source bounds this value (up to, at least, about); restore the qualifier or use :q." },
 	unbound_sentence: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "Bind the sentence to a fact, a quote, a citation, or a claim-graph node with data-claim." },
 	meaning_drift_confirmed: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "Two independent readers found the same drift; rewrite from the quote or dispute with a reason." },
-	polish_edit_rejected: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The edit changed a number, a hedge, a qualifier, a link, or a claim id; re-propose the language fix only." },
+	meaning_unverified: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "No meaning reader judged this pair, or no strong reader judged a force_strong pair; run the missing reader on pairs.json and rerun fact meaning-check." },
+	polish_edit_rejected: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The edit changed a number, a hedge, a qualifier, a link, or a claim id, or contained <, > or &; re-propose the language fix only, narrowed to the words around any entity or tag." },
 	polish_hedging_decreased: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The polish pass removed qualifiers; restore them." },
 	polish_text_churn: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "More than half the text changed during polish; the pass composed instead of proofreading." },
 	snapshot_mismatch: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The operands come from different collection windows; use rows from one window or state the windows separately." },
@@ -73,6 +85,7 @@ export const DEFECT_CODES = deepFreeze({
 	quote_stale_version: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The quoted source revision differs from the revision the report targets; re-snapshot the target revision or date the quote." },
 	quote_fuzzy_match: { severity: "minor", integrity: false, hint: "The source text is OCR-noisy; confirm the snapshot and prefer the raw document." },
 	name_outside_quote: { severity: "minor", integrity: false, hint: "A name in the sentence is not in the cited quote; add the source or remove the name." },
+	verification_claim_unmarked: { severity: "minor", integrity: false, hint: "The sentence reads as a check we ran but carries no verified mark; mark it {{V:F<n>:label}} on a recorded command-output row, or reword it." },
 	scope_widened_warn: { severity: "minor", integrity: false, hint: "The sentence uses a broader scope word than the quote; confirm the scope or narrow it." },
 	particle_unverified: { severity: "minor", integrity: false, hint: "The particle after this value could not be checked; read it aloud and fix it by hand if wrong." },
 	fallback_without_entity: { severity: "minor", integrity: false, hint: "The replacement quote has no entity for attribution; set one on the row." },
@@ -87,10 +100,10 @@ export const FIDELITY_CODES = Object.freeze([
 	"unresolved_placeholder", "value_mismatch", "unit_mismatch", "quote_not_verbatim", "claim_status_invalid",
 	"incompatible_operands", "pointer_label_mismatch", "quote_anchor_unresolved", "unit_duplicated", "polish_diff_fail",
 	"fidelity_interview_incomplete", "derived_not_allowed", "source_outside_floor", "snapshot_hash_mismatch",
-	"chart_value_untraceable", "quote_unbound", "edition_unverified", "untraceable_number", "unsupported_verification",
+	"chart_value_untraceable", "quote_unbound", "edition_unverified", "untraceable_number", "unsupported_verification", "claim_kind_mismatch",
 	"conflicting_readings", "hedge_dropped", "direction_flipped", "causality_added", "qualifier_dropped", "unbound_sentence",
-	"meaning_drift_confirmed", "polish_edit_rejected", "polish_hedging_decreased", "polish_text_churn", "snapshot_mismatch",
-	"join_integrity_fail", "quote_stale_version", "quote_fuzzy_match", "name_outside_quote", "scope_widened_warn",
+	"meaning_drift_confirmed", "meaning_unverified", "polish_edit_rejected", "polish_hedging_decreased", "polish_text_churn", "snapshot_mismatch",
+	"join_integrity_fail", "quote_stale_version", "quote_fuzzy_match", "name_outside_quote", "verification_claim_unmarked", "scope_widened_warn",
 	"particle_unverified", "fallback_without_entity", "meaning_drift_warn", "polish_edit_unlocated", "polish_link_changed",
 	"polish_name_changed",
 ])
@@ -184,6 +197,14 @@ export function validateOutcomeManifest(manifest) {
 	if (isObject(manifest.gates)) {
 		for (const gate of GATE_NAMES) check(errors, GATE_STATUSES.includes(manifest.gates[gate]), `gates.${gate} must be one of ${GATE_STATUSES.join(", ")}`)
 	} else errors.push("gates must be an object")
+	if (manifest.gateHistory !== undefined) {
+		if (!Array.isArray(manifest.gateHistory)) errors.push("gateHistory must be an array")
+		else for (const entry of manifest.gateHistory) {
+			check(errors, isObject(entry) && GATE_NAMES.includes(entry.gate) && GATE_STATUSES.includes(entry.status)
+				&& typeof entry.at === "string" && ISO_DATE.test(entry.at)
+				&& (entry.reason === undefined || typeof entry.reason === "string"), "gateHistory entries must have a known gate, status, timestamp, and optional reason")
+		}
+	}
 	if (Array.isArray(manifest.residualDefects)) manifest.residualDefects.forEach((defect, index) => validateDefect(defect, `residualDefects[${index}]`, errors))
 	else errors.push("residualDefects must be an array")
 	check(errors, manifest.repair === null || isObject(manifest.repair), "repair must be null or an object")

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/ulw-research/scripts/contracts.test.ts

@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ const FIDELITY_BLOCKERS = [
 const FIDELITY_MAJORS = [
 	"untraceable_number",
 	"unsupported_verification",
+	"claim_kind_mismatch",
 	"conflicting_readings",
 	"hedge_dropped",
 	"direction_flipped",
@@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ const FIDELITY_MAJORS = [
 	"qualifier_dropped",
 	"unbound_sentence",
 	"meaning_drift_confirmed",
+	"meaning_unverified",
 	"polish_edit_rejected",
 	"polish_hedging_decreased",
 	"polish_text_churn",
@@ -92,6 +94,7 @@ const FIDELITY_MAJORS = [
 const FIDELITY_MINORS = [
 	"quote_fuzzy_match",
 	"name_outside_quote",
+	"verification_claim_unmarked",
 	"scope_widened_warn",
 	"particle_unverified",
 	"fallback_without_entity",

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/ulw-research/scripts/copy-returns.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+// Architecture contract (retention bar): each shared table, list, regex, or classifier has one owner
+// export, so a reintroduced local copy in a consumer fails one of these tests (#11156 sweep).
+import { describe, expect, test } from "bun:test"
+import { readdirSync, readFileSync } from "node:fs"
+import { join } from "node:path"
+
+import { sha256Of } from "./cli-support.mjs"
+import { countDefects, DEFECT_CODES, SEVERITIES } from "./contracts.mjs"
+import { meaningStatus, PROMOTION, promotionEligibility } from "./fact-commands-meaning.mjs"
+import { editionFormatOf, MD_HTML_BLOCK_RULES, markdownAsHtml, projectMarkdownInline } from "./fact-commands-verify.mjs"
+import { EXEMPT_KINDS, isExemptKind } from "./fidelity-binding.mjs"
+import { blocksDelivery } from "./gates-fidelity.mjs"
+import { MD_BLOCK_PATTERNS, parseMarkdown } from "./md-lite.mjs"
+import { DRIFT_KINDS, isDriftKind, MODEL_TIERS, VERDICT_SCHEMA, VERDICTS } from "./meaning-check.mjs"
+import { parseRenderedQuote, renderQuote } from "./placeholder.mjs"
+
+const source = (name: string) => readFileSync(join(import.meta.dir, name), "utf8")
+
+describe("severity vocabulary comes from contracts", () => {
+	test("#given DEFECT_CODES #when its severities are collected #then they are exactly SEVERITIES", () => {
+		const used = new Set(Object.values(DEFECT_CODES).map((entry) => entry.severity))
+		expect([...used].sort()).toEqual([...SEVERITIES].sort())
+		expect(Object.isFrozen(SEVERITIES)).toBe(true)
+	})
+
+	test("#given defects of every severity #when counted #then the buckets are SEVERITIES plus total", () => {
+		const defects = SEVERITIES.map((severity) => ({ severity }))
+		expect(Object.keys(countDefects(defects))).toEqual([...SEVERITIES, "total"])
+		expect(countDefects(defects)).toEqual({ ...Object.fromEntries(SEVERITIES.map((severity) => [severity, 1])), total: SEVERITIES.length })
+	})
+
+	test("#given every registry code and an unknown code #when the meaning status is computed #then it follows blocksDelivery", () => {
+		for (const code of [...Object.keys(DEFECT_CODES), "not_a_registered_code"]) {
+			expect(meaningStatus([{ code, severity: "minor" }]), code).toBe(blocksDelivery({ code }) ? "fail" : "pass")
+		}
+		expect(meaningStatus([])).toBe("pass")
+	})
+
+	test("#given the command modules #when read #then none restates the severity buckets, the pair kinds, or a window literal", () => {
+		for (const name of ["fact-commands-meaning.mjs", "fact-commands-verify.mjs"]) {
+			const text = source(name)
+			expect(text, name).not.toMatch(/blocker:\s*0/u)
+			expect(text, name).not.toMatch(/\["quote",\s*"claim",\s*"translation"\]/u)
+			expect(text, name).not.toMatch(/slice\(-\d+\)/u)
+			expect(text, name).not.toMatch(/counts\.blocker \+ counts\.major/u)
+		}
+	})
+})
+
+describe("one sha256 helper", () => {
+	test("#given every runtime module #when read #then only cli-support builds a hash, so records and receipts share sha256Of", () => {
+		const modules = readdirSync(import.meta.dir).filter((name) => name.endsWith(".mjs") && name !== "cli-support.mjs")
+		expect(modules.length).toBeGreaterThan(0)
+		for (const name of modules) expect(source(name), name).not.toMatch(/createHash\(/u)
+		expect(sha256Of("abc")).toBe("ba7816bf8f01cfea414140de5dae2223b00361a396177a9cb410ff61f20015ad")
+		expect(sha256Of(Buffer.from("abc"))).toBe(sha256Of("abc"))
+	})
+})
+
+describe("calibration policy is the exported PROMOTION", () => {
+	const confirmedRun = (run: string, disputed: boolean) => ({ run_id: run, confirmed: true, disputed })
+
+	test("#given false blocks only before the window #when eligibility is computed #then they are not counted", () => {
+		const window = PROMOTION.false_block_window
+		expect(Number.isInteger(window) && window > 0).toBe(true)
+		const old = [0, 1, 2].map((n) => confirmedRun(`old${n}`, true))
+		const recent = Array.from({ length: window }, (_, n) => confirmedRun(`new${n}`, false))
+		expect(promotionEligibility([...old, ...recent]).report_false_blocks_in_window).toBe(0)
+		expect(promotionEligibility([...recent, ...old]).report_false_blocks_in_window).toBe(3)
+	})
+
+	test("#given false blocks at the policy maximum #when eligibility is computed #then the threshold read from PROMOTION decides", () => {
+		const limit = PROMOTION.max_report_false_blocks_in_window
+		const clean = Array.from({ length: PROMOTION.min_runs * 20 }, (_, n) => confirmedRun(`c${n}`, false))
+		const blocks = (count: number) => Array.from({ length: count }, (_, n) => confirmedRun(`b${n}`, true))
+		expect(promotionEligibility([...clean, ...blocks(limit)]).eligible).toBe(true)
+		expect(promotionEligibility([...clean, ...blocks(limit + 1)]).eligible).toBe(false)
+	})
+})
+
+describe("verdict schema comes from the meaning-check registries", () => {
+	test("#given VERDICT_SCHEMA #when read #then its vocabularies are the owner exports", () => {
+		expect(VERDICT_SCHEMA.verdict).toBe(VERDICTS)
+		expect(VERDICT_SCHEMA.model_tier).toBe(MODEL_TIERS)
+		expect(VERDICT_SCHEMA.drift_kind).toBe(DRIFT_KINDS)
+		expect(Object.isFrozen(VERDICTS)).toBe(true)
+	})
+
+	test("#given every drift kind and a stranger #when checked #then isDriftKind is membership in DRIFT_KINDS", () => {
+		for (const kind of DRIFT_KINDS) expect(isDriftKind(kind)).toBe(true)
+		expect(isDriftKind("not_a_kind")).toBe(false)
+		expect(source("meaning-check.mjs")).not.toMatch(/new Set\(DRIFT_KINDS\)|new Set\(\["drift"/u)
+	})
+})
+
+describe("inherited lexical tables come from their owners", () => {
+	test("#given fact-pairs #when read #then it holds no Hangul range, exempt-kind set, or hand-built hedge regex", () => {
+		const text = source("fact-pairs.mjs")
+		expect(text).not.toMatch(/\\uAC00-\\uD7A3/u)
+		expect(text).not.toMatch(/\["opinion",\s*"recommendation"\]/u)
+		expect(text).not.toMatch(/new RegExp\(/u)
+	})
+
+	test("#given EXEMPT_KINDS #when checked #then isExemptKind is membership in it", () => {
+		for (const kind of EXEMPT_KINDS) expect(isExemptKind(kind)).toBe(true)
+		expect(isExemptKind("finding")).toBe(false)
+		expect(isExemptKind(undefined)).toBe(false)
+	})
+
+	test("#given md-lite #when its block grammar is read #then MD_BLOCK_PATTERNS names every block regex", () => {
+		expect(Object.keys(MD_BLOCK_PATTERNS).sort()).toEqual(["BLOCKQUOTE", "CLOSING_HASHES", "FENCE", "HEADING", "LIST_ITEM", "TABLE_SEPARATOR", "THEMATIC_BREAK"])
+		for (const pattern of Object.values(MD_BLOCK_PATTERNS)) expect(pattern).toBeInstanceOf(RegExp)
+		expect(Object.isFrozen(MD_BLOCK_PATTERNS)).toBe(true)
+	})
+})
+
+describe("markdown projection rules", () => {
+	const EVERY_KIND = ["# Title", "", "Para text.", "", "- item", "", "> quoted", "", "| a | b |", "| - | - |", "| 1 | 2 |", "", "```", "code", "```", ""].join("\n")
+
+	test("#given every block kind md-lite emits #when projected #then each kind has a projection rule", () => {
+		const kinds = [...new Set(parseMarkdown(EVERY_KIND).blocks.map((block: { kind: string }) => block.kind))].sort()
+		expect(kinds).toEqual(["blockquote", "code", "heading", "list_item", "paragraph", "table_row"])
+		for (const kind of kinds) expect(Object.hasOwn(MD_HTML_BLOCK_RULES, kind), kind).toBe(true)
+		expect(Object.keys(MD_HTML_BLOCK_RULES).sort()).toEqual(kinds)
+		const { html } = markdownAsHtml(EVERY_KIND, [], { rows: [] })
+		expect(html).toContain("<h1>Title</h1>")
+		expect(html).toContain("<ul><li>item</li></ul>")
+		expect(html).toMatch(/<table><tr><td>a<\/td><td>b<\/td><\/tr>\s*<tr><td>1<\/td><td>2<\/td><\/tr><\/table>/u)
+	})
+
+	test("#given an unterminated fence #when projected #then it is refused naming the line", () => {
+		expect(() => markdownAsHtml("Intro.\n\n```\nno close\n", [], { rows: [] })).toThrow(/unterminated_fence at line 3/u)
+	})
+
+	test("#given inline links and code #when projected #then they stay elements and the rest is escaped", () => {
+		expect(projectMarkdownInline("a <b> [x](https://e.x) `c`")).toBe('a &lt;b&gt; <a href="https://e.x">x</a> <code>c</code>')
+	})
+
+	test("#given a fill map with quotes in translates and fact_id #when projected #then the attributes are escaped", () => {
+		const md = "Before X after.\n\n> Quoted block.\n"
+		const span = { fact_id: 'F"1', start: 7, end: 8, rendered: "X", translates: 'T"1' }
+		const block = { fact_id: 'Q"2', start: md.indexOf(">"), end: md.length - 1, rendered: "", replaced: "a" }
+		const { html } = markdownAsHtml(md, [span, block], { rows: [] })
+		expect(html).toContain('data-translates="T&quot;1"')
+		expect(html).toContain('data-fact="Q&quot;2"')
+		expect(markdownAsHtml("Before X after.\n", [{ ...span, translates: undefined }], { rows: [] }).html).toContain('data-fact="F&quot;1"')
+		expect(html).not.toMatch(/="[^"]*"1"/u)
+	})
+
+	test("#given paths of each case #when the format is inferred #then md and markdown are Markdown and a flag wins", () => {
+		expect(["r.md", "R.MD", "r.markdown", "r.html", "r.txt"].map((path) => editionFormatOf(path, undefined))).toEqual(["md", "md", "md", "html", "html"])
+		expect(editionFormatOf("r.md", "html")).toBe("html")
+	})
+})
+
+describe("rendered quotes round-trip through the placeholder owner", () => {
+	const row = { fact_id: "Q1", kind: "quote", source_id: "S4", quote: "We estimate completion no earlier than 2027." }
+	const selections = [
+		["full", row.quote],
+		["lead=2", "We estimate"],
+		["from=completion,to=2027", "completion no earlier than 2027"],
+	]
+
+	for (const [selector, text] of selections) {
+		test(`#given a ${selector} quote rendered for md #when projected #then the quote element and marker survive`, () => {
+			const rendered = renderQuote(row, selector, text, "md")
+			expect(parseRenderedQuote(rendered)).toEqual({ text, marker: "[S4]" })
+			const md = `The operator wrote ${rendered}.\n`
+			const entry = { fact_id: "Q1", start: md.indexOf(rendered), end: md.indexOf(rendered) + rendered.length, rendered, selector }
+			const projected = markdownAsHtml(md, [entry], { rows: [row] })
+			expect(projected.html).toContain(renderQuote(row, selector, text, "html"))
+			expect(projected.stale).toEqual([])
+			const edited = md.replace(text, `${text} indeed`)
+			const stale = markdownAsHtml(edited, [{ ...entry, end: entry.end + " indeed".length }], { rows: [row] })
+			expect(stale.html).not.toContain("<q ")
+			expect(stale.stale).toHaveLength(1)
+		})
+	}
+
+	test("#given bytes that are not the md quote layout #when parsed #then null", () => {
+		expect(parseRenderedQuote("plain text [S4]")).toBeNull()
+	})
+})

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/ulw-research/scripts/delivery-barrier.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+import { describe, expect, onTestFinished, test } from "bun:test"
+import { mkdirSync, mkdtempSync, readFileSync, rmSync, unlinkSync, writeFileSync } from "node:fs"
+import { tmpdir } from "node:os"
+import { join } from "node:path"
+
+import { sha256Of } from "./cli-support.mjs"
+import { DEFECT_CODES } from "./contracts.mjs"
+import { FIDELITY_RECORDS, MEANING_RECORD, RECORD_ENVELOPE, writeFidelityRecord } from "./fidelity-records.mjs"
+import { blocksDelivery } from "./gates-fidelity.mjs"
+import { run } from "./report-tools.mjs"
+
+async function delivered(format = "html", codes: string[] | null = null) {
+	const root = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), "delivery-barrier-"))
+	onTestFinished(() => rmSync(root, { recursive: true, force: true }))
+	const dir = join(root, "20260101-120000")
+	mkdirSync(dir)
+	const path = join(dir, `report.${format}`)
+	const record = join(dir, "fidelity-defects.json")
+	writeFileSync(path, "<p>Report</p>")
+	if (codes !== null) writeFidelityRecord(record, "fidelity", { artifact_sha256: sha256Of(readFileSync(path)), report: path, defects: codes.map((code) => ({ code, severity: "minor", message: code })) })
+	const invoke = (args: string[]) => run(["outcome", ...args, "--session-dir", dir])
+	await invoke(["init", "--promised", format])
+	expect((await invoke(["set", format, "delivered", "--path", path, ...(codes === null ? [] : ["--verified-by", record])])).exitCode).toBe(0)
+	return { dir, path, record, invoke }
+}
+
+// Enumerate the source registry, not a second list of today's fidelity codes.
+for (const [code, entry] of Object.entries(DEFECT_CODES)) {
+	if (!entry.integrity && entry.severity === "minor") continue
+	test(`#given registry blocker ${code} #when verified and finished #then delivery refuses despite a demoted row`, async () => {
+		const { dir, invoke } = await delivered("html", [code])
+		for (const command of ["verify", "finish"]) {
+			const result = await invoke([command])
+			expect(result.exitCode).toBe(1)
+			expect(result.json.problems).toContainEqual(expect.objectContaining({ code: "fidelity_unresolved", codes: [code] }))
+		}
+		expect(JSON.parse(readFileSync(join(dir, "outcome.json"), "utf8")).finishedAt).toBeNull()
+	})
+}
+
+test("#given an unknown defect code #when verified or finished #then delivery refuses with its reason", async () => {
+	const { invoke } = await delivered("html", ["future_fidelity_defect"])
+	for (const command of ["verify", "finish"]) {
+		const result = await invoke([command])
+		expect(result.exitCode).toBe(1)
+		expect(JSON.stringify(result.json.problems)).toContain("unknown defect code future_fidelity_defect")
+	}
+})
+
+test("#given a registry non-blocker #when verified and finished #then delivery passes", async () => {
+	const entry = Object.entries(DEFECT_CODES).find(([, value]) => !value.integrity && value.severity === "minor")
+	if (!entry) throw new Error("registry must have a non-blocking entry")
+	const { invoke } = await delivered("html", [entry[0]])
+	expect((await invoke(["verify"])).exitCode).toBe(0)
+	expect((await invoke(["finish"])).exitCode).toBe(0)
+})
+
+for (const format of ["html", "pdf", "docx"]) {
+	test(`#given delivered ${format} without any ledger or gate record #when verified and finished #then both refuse`, async () => {
+		const { invoke } = await delivered(format)
+		for (const command of ["verify", "finish"]) {
+			const result = await invoke([command])
+			expect(result.exitCode).toBe(1)
+			expect(JSON.stringify(result.json.problems)).toContain("fidelity gate not run")
+		}
+	})
+}
+
+test("#given a missing gate #when explicitly skipped with a reason #then the logged choice permits delivery", async () => {
+	const { dir, invoke } = await delivered()
+	const now = "2026-01-01T12:01:00.000Z"
+	await invoke(["gate", "fidelity", "not_run", "--reason", "No factual content in this edition", "--now", now])
+	const manifest = JSON.parse(readFileSync(join(dir, "outcome.json"), "utf8"))
+	expect(manifest.gateHistory).toContainEqual({ gate: "fidelity", status: "not_run", reason: "No factual content in this edition", at: now })
+	expect((await invoke(["verify"])).exitCode).toBe(0)
+	expect((await invoke(["finish"])).exitCode).toBe(0)
+	await invoke(["gate", "fidelity", "pass"])
+	expect((await invoke(["verify"])).exitCode).toBe(1)
+})
+
+test("#given a missing gate #when skipped without a meaningful reason #then the command refuses", async () => {
+	const { invoke } = await delivered()
+	for (const reason of [[], ["--reason", "   "]]) {
+		await expect(invoke(["gate", "fidelity", "not_run", ...reason])).rejects.toThrow("reason")
+	}
+})
+
+test("#given a fact ledger and an unverified edition #when the gate is skipped with a reason #then delivery still refuses", async () => {
+	const { dir, invoke } = await delivered()
+	writeFileSync(join(dir, "fact-ledger.json"), JSON.stringify({ version: 1, facts: [] }))
+	await invoke(["gate", "fidelity", "not_run", "--reason", "This harness has no verifier"])
+	for (const command of ["verify", "finish"]) {
+		const result = await invoke([command])
+		expect(result.exitCode).toBe(1)
+		expect(JSON.stringify(result.json.problems)).toContain("fidelity gate not run")
+	}
+})
+
+test("#given a stale fidelity record nobody attached #when the gate is skipped with a reason #then delivery still refuses", async () => {
+	const { dir, path, invoke } = await delivered()
+	writeFidelityRecord(join(dir, "fidelity-defects.json"), "fidelity", { artifact_sha256: "0".repeat(64), report: path, defects: [] })
+	await invoke(["gate", "fidelity", "not_run", "--reason", "This harness has no verifier"])
+	for (const command of ["verify", "finish"]) {
+		const result = await invoke([command])
+		expect(result.exitCode).toBe(1)
+		expect(JSON.stringify(result.json.problems)).toContain("fidelity gate not run")
+	}
+})
+
+test("#given an explicit skip and an existing blocker #when verified #then the skip cannot release the blocker", async () => {
+	const { invoke } = await delivered("html", ["claim_status_invalid"])
+	await invoke(["gate", "fidelity", "not_run", "--reason", "Unsupported edition"])
+	expect((await invoke(["verify"])).exitCode).toBe(1)
+})
+
+const LOCKED_BRIEF = readFileSync(join(import.meta.dir, "tests", "fixtures", "fidelity-brief-locked.md"), "utf8")
+const BLOCKER = Object.keys(DEFECT_CODES).find((code) => blocksDelivery({ code })) as string
+
+/**
+ * A delivered html edition whose locked brief requires every table record, each present, fresh for
+ * the delivered bytes, and clean. recordPath is where the session keeps each row's record; a table
+ * row with no entry here fails the coverage test below, so a new row brings its own cases.
+ */
+async function fullyRecorded(brief = LOCKED_BRIEF) {
+	const session = await delivered("html", [])
+	writeFileSync(join(session.dir, "brief.md"), brief)
+	const recordPath: Record<string, string> = { fidelity: session.record, meaning: join(session.dir, MEANING_RECORD) }
+	const write = (kind: string, fields: Record<string, unknown> = {}) =>
+		writeFidelityRecord(recordPath[kind], kind, { artifact_sha256: sha256Of(readFileSync(session.path)), report: session.path, defects: [], ...fields })
+	write("meaning")
+	const outcomes = async () => Promise.all(["verify", "finish"].map((command) => session.invoke([command])))
+	return { ...session, recordPath, write, outcomes }
+}
+
+async function expectRefused(session: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof fullyRecorded>>, problem: Record<string, unknown>) {
+	for (const result of await session.outcomes()) {
+		expect(result.exitCode).toBe(1)
+		expect(result.json.problems).toContainEqual(expect.objectContaining(problem))
+	}
+}
+
+test("#given the record table #when every row is read #then each row has every rule column and an arranged session path", async () => {
+	const { recordPath } = await fullyRecorded()
+	expect(Object.keys(recordPath).sort()).toEqual(FIDELITY_RECORDS.map((entry) => entry.kind).sort())
+	for (const entry of FIDELITY_RECORDS) {
+		for (const column of ["targets", "requiredWhen", "remedy", "blocking"] as const) expect(typeof entry[column], `${entry.kind}.${column}`).toBe("function")
+		expect(RECORD_ENVELOPE).toContain(entry.bindsTo)
+	}
+})
+
+// The table is the barrier's spec: every row gets the same five cases.
+for (const entry of FIDELITY_RECORDS) {
+	describe(`record row ${entry.kind}`, () => {
+		test("#given the record is missing while required #when verified and finished #then delivery refuses", async () => {
+			const session = await fullyRecorded()
+			unlinkSync(session.recordPath[entry.kind])
+			await expectRefused(session, { code: "edition_unverified", path: session.recordPath[entry.kind] })
+		})
+
+		test("#given the record is for other bytes #when verified and finished #then delivery refuses: a different edition", async () => {
+			const session = await fullyRecorded()
+			session.write(entry.kind, { artifact_sha256: sha256Of("an earlier draft") })
+			await expectRefused(session, { code: "edition_unverified", path: session.recordPath[entry.kind], message: expect.stringContaining("is for a different edition") })
+		})
+
+		test("#given a fresh record with a blocking defect #when verified and finished #then delivery refuses", async () => {
+			const session = await fullyRecorded()
+			session.write(entry.kind, { defects: [{ code: BLOCKER, severity: "minor", message: BLOCKER }] })
+			await expectRefused(session, { code: "fidelity_unresolved", codes: [BLOCKER], path: session.recordPath[entry.kind] })
+		})
+
+		test("#given a fresh clean record #when verified and finished #then delivery passes", async () => {
+			const session = await fullyRecorded()
+			expect((await session.outcomes()).map((result) => result.exitCode)).toEqual([0, 0])
+		})
+
+		for (const [name, mutate] of [
+			["a missing envelope field", (record: Record<string, unknown>) => delete record.written_at],
+			["an unknown field", (record: Record<string, unknown>) => Object.assign(record, { verified_elsewhere: true })],
+			["another record kind", (record: Record<string, unknown>) => Object.assign(record, { record_kind: "not_a_record_kind" })],
+		] as const) {
+			test(`#given a record with ${name} #when verified and finished #then delivery refuses it as malformed`, async () => {
+				const session = await fullyRecorded()
+				const path = session.recordPath[entry.kind]
+				const record = JSON.parse(readFileSync(path, "utf8"))
+				mutate(record)
+				writeFileSync(path, JSON.stringify(record))
+				await expectRefused(session, { code: "edition_unverified", path, message: expect.stringContaining("is malformed") })
+			})
+		}
+	})
+}
+
+test("#given a record kind outside the table or a malformed envelope #when written #then the writer refuses", () => {
+	const dir = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), "delivery-barrier-writer-"))
+	onTestFinished(() => rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }))
+	const fields = { artifact_sha256: sha256Of("x"), report: join(dir, "report.html"), defects: [] }
+	expect(() => writeFidelityRecord(join(dir, "a.json"), "not_a_record_kind", fields)).toThrow("unknown fidelity record kind")
+	expect(() => writeFidelityRecord(join(dir, "b.json"), "meaning", { ...fields, artifact_sha256: "draft" })).toThrow("malformed")
+	expect(() => writeFidelityRecord(join(dir, "c.json"), "meaning", { ...fields, gatesRun: [] })).toThrow("unknown field")
+})
+
+/** A delivered, fidelity-verified html edition in a session whose locked brief sets `meaning check`. */
+async function meaningSession(meaning: "on" | "off", codes: string[] | null) {
+	const session = await fullyRecorded(LOCKED_BRIEF.replace("meaning check: on", `meaning check: ${meaning}`))
+	if (codes === null) unlinkSync(session.recordPath.meaning)
+	else session.write("meaning", { defects: codes.map((code) => ({ code, severity: "major", message: code })) })
+	return session
+}
+
+for (const code of ["meaning_drift_confirmed", "meaning_unverified"]) {
+	test(`#given a meaning record with ${code} #when verified and finished #then delivery refuses`, async () => {
+		const session = await meaningSession("on", [code])
+		await expectRefused(session, { code: "fidelity_unresolved", codes: [code], path: join(session.dir, MEANING_RECORD) })
+	})
+}
+
+test("#given the brief says meaning check on and the meaning step was skipped #when verified and finished #then delivery refuses: meaning gate not run", async () => {
+	const session = await meaningSession("on", null)
+	await expectRefused(session, { message: expect.stringContaining("meaning gate not run") })
+})
+
+test("#given a malformed ## Fidelity block that tries to turn meaning check off #when no meaning record exists #then delivery refuses: meaning gate not run", async () => {
+	const malformed = LOCKED_BRIEF.replace("meaning check: on (answered_by: default)", "meaning check: on (answered_by: default)\nmeaning check: off (answered_by: user)")
+	const session = await fullyRecorded(malformed)
+	unlinkSync(session.recordPath.meaning)
+	await expectRefused(session, { message: expect.stringContaining("meaning gate not run") })
+})
+
+test("#given the brief says meaning check off and no meaning record #when verified and finished #then delivery passes", async () => {
+	const session = await meaningSession("off", null)
+	expect((await session.outcomes()).map((result) => result.exitCode)).toEqual([0, 0])
+})
+
+test("#given a clean meaning record (warn only) under meaning check on #when verified #then delivery passes", async () => {
+	const { invoke } = await meaningSession("on", ["meaning_drift_warn"])
+	expect((await invoke(["verify"])).exitCode).toBe(0)
+})
+
+test("#given meaning check on, no fidelity evidence, and an explicit fidelity not_run #when verified #then the logged exemption covers the meaning step too", async () => {
+	const { dir, invoke } = await delivered()
+	writeFileSync(join(dir, "brief.md"), LOCKED_BRIEF)
+	await invoke(["gate", "fidelity", "not_run", "--reason", "No factual content in this edition"])
+	expect((await invoke(["verify"])).exitCode).toBe(0)
+})