frappe-builder 1.1.0-dev.8

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/bmad-product-brief-preview/prompts/finalize.md

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+**Language:** Use `{communication_language}` for all output.
+**Output Language:** Use `{document_output_language}` for documents.
+**Output Location:** `{planning_artifacts}`
+
+# Stage 5: Finalize
+
+**Goal:** Save the polished brief, offer the LLM distillate, and point the user forward.
+
+## Step 1: Polish and Save
+
+Update the product brief document at `{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{project_name}.md`:
+- Update frontmatter `status` to `"complete"`
+- Update `updated` timestamp
+- Ensure formatting is clean and consistent
+- Confirm the document reads well as a standalone 1-2 page executive summary
+
+## Step 2: Offer the Distillate
+
+Throughout the discovery process, you likely captured detail that doesn't belong in a 1-2 page executive summary but is valuable for downstream work — requirements hints, platform preferences, rejected ideas, technical constraints, detailed user scenarios, competitive deep-dives, etc.
+
+**Ask the user:**
+"Your product brief is complete. During our conversation, I captured additional detail that goes beyond the executive summary — things like [mention 2-3 specific examples of overflow you captured]. Would you like me to create a detail pack for PRD creation? It distills all that extra context into a concise, structured format optimized for the next phase."
+
+**If yes, create the distillate** at `{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{project_name}-distillate.md`:
+
+```yaml
+---
+title: "Product Brief Distillate: {project_name}"
+type: llm-distillate
+source: "product-brief-{project_name}.md"
+created: "{timestamp}"
+purpose: "Token-efficient context for downstream PRD creation"
+---
+```
+
+**Distillate content principles:**
+- Dense bullet points, not prose
+- Each bullet carries enough context to be understood standalone (don't assume the reader has the full brief loaded)
+- Group by theme, not by when it was mentioned
+- Include:
+  - **Rejected ideas** — so downstream workflows don't re-propose them, with brief rationale
+  - **Requirements hints** — anything the user mentioned that sounds like a requirement
+  - **Technical context** — platforms, integrations, constraints, preferences
+  - **Detailed user scenarios** — richer than what fits in the exec summary
+  - **Competitive intelligence** — specifics from web research worth preserving
+  - **Open questions** — things surfaced but not resolved during discovery
+  - **Scope signals** — what the user indicated is in/out/maybe for MVP
+- Token-conscious: be concise, but give enough context per bullet so an LLM reading this later understands WHY each point matters
+
+**Headless mode:** Always create the distillate automatically — unless the session was too brief to capture meaningful overflow (in that case, note this in the completion output instead of creating an empty file).
+
+## Step 3: Present Completion
+
+"Your product brief for {project_name} is complete!
+
+**Executive Brief:** `{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{project_name}.md`
+[If distillate created:] **Detail Pack:** `{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{project_name}-distillate.md`
+
+**Recommended next step:** Use the product brief (and detail pack) as input for PRD creation — tell your assistant 'create a PRD' and point it to these files."
+[If distillate created:] "The detail pack contains all the overflow context (requirements hints, rejected ideas, technical constraints) specifically structured for the PRD workflow to consume."
+
+**Headless mode:** Output the file paths as structured JSON and exit:
+```json
+{
+  "status": "complete",
+  "brief": "{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{project_name}.md",
+  "distillate": "{path or null}",
+  "confidence": "high|medium|low",
+  "open_questions": ["any unresolved items"]
+}
+```
+
+## Stage Complete
+
+This is the terminal stage. After delivering the completion message and file paths, the workflow is done. If the user requests further revisions, loop back to `draft-and-review.md`. Otherwise, exit.

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/bmad-product-brief-preview/prompts/guided-elicitation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+**Language:** Use `{communication_language}` for all output.
+**Output Language:** Use `{document_output_language}` for documents.
+
+# Stage 3: Guided Elicitation
+
+**Goal:** Fill the gaps in what you know. By now you have the user's brain dump, artifact analysis, and web research. This stage is about smart, targeted questioning — not rote section-by-section interrogation.
+
+**Skip this stage entirely in Yolo and Autonomous modes** — go directly to `draft-and-review.md`.
+
+## Approach
+
+You are NOT walking through a rigid questionnaire. You're having a conversation that covers the substance of a great product brief. The topics below are your mental checklist, not a script. Adapt to:
+- What you already know (don't re-ask what's been covered)
+- What the user is excited about (follow their energy)
+- What's genuinely unclear (focus questions where they matter)
+
+## Topics to Cover (flexibly, conversationally)
+
+### Vision & Problem
+- What core problem does this solve? For whom?
+- How do people solve this today? What's frustrating about current approaches?
+- What would success look like for the people this helps?
+- What's the insight or angle that makes this approach different?
+
+### Users & Value
+- Who experiences this problem most acutely?
+- Are there different user types with different needs?
+- What's the "aha moment" — when does a user realize this is what they needed?
+- How does this fit into their existing workflow or life?
+
+### Market & Differentiation
+- What competitive or alternative solutions exist? (Leverage web research findings)
+- What's the unfair advantage or defensible moat?
+- Why is now the right time for this?
+
+### Success & Scope
+- How will you know this is working? What metrics matter?
+- What's the minimum viable version that creates real value?
+- What's explicitly NOT in scope for the first version?
+- If this is wildly successful, what does it become in 2-3 years?
+
+## The Flow
+
+For each topic area where you have gaps:
+
+1. **Lead with what you know** — "Based on your input and my research, it sounds like [X]. Is that right?"
+2. **Ask the gap question** — targeted, specific, not generic
+3. **Reflect and confirm** — paraphrase what you heard
+4. **"Anything else on this, or shall we move on?"** — the soft gate
+
+If the user is giving you detail beyond brief scope (requirements, architecture, platform details, timelines), **capture it silently** for the distillate. Acknowledge it briefly ("Good detail, I'll capture that") but don't derail the conversation.
+
+## When to Move On
+
+When you have enough substance to draft a compelling 1-2 page executive brief covering:
+- Clear problem and who it affects
+- Proposed solution and what makes it different
+- Target users (at least primary)
+- Some sense of success criteria or business objectives
+- MVP-level scope thinking
+
+You don't need perfection — you need enough to draft well. Missing details can be surfaced during the review stage.
+
+If the user is providing complete, confident answers and you have solid coverage across all four topic areas after fewer than 3-4 exchanges, proactively offer to draft early.
+
+**Transition:** "I think I have a solid picture. Ready for me to draft the brief, or is there anything else you'd like to add?"
+
+## Stage Complete
+
+This stage is complete when sufficient substance exists to draft a compelling brief and the user confirms readiness. Route to `draft-and-review.md`.

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/bmad-product-brief-preview/resources/brief-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Product Brief Template
+
+This is a flexible guide for the executive product brief — adapt it to serve the product's story. Merge sections, add new ones, reorder as needed. The product determines the structure, not the template.
+
+## Sensible Default Structure
+
+```markdown
+# Product Brief: {Product Name}
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+[2-3 paragraph narrative: What is this? What problem does it solve? Why does it matter? Why now?
+This should be compelling enough to stand alone — if someone reads only this section, they should understand the vision.]
+
+## The Problem
+
+[What pain exists? Who feels it? How are they coping today? What's the cost of the status quo?
+Be specific — real scenarios, real frustrations, real consequences.]
+
+## The Solution
+
+[What are we building? How does it solve the problem?
+Focus on the experience and outcome, not the implementation.]
+
+## What Makes This Different
+
+[Key differentiators. Why this approach vs alternatives? What's the unfair advantage?
+Be honest — if the moat is execution speed, say so. Don't fabricate technical moats.]
+
+## Who This Serves
+
+[Primary users — vivid but brief. Who are they, what do they need, what does success look like for them?
+Secondary users if relevant.]
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+[How do we know this is working? What metrics matter?
+Mix of user success signals and business objectives. Be measurable.]
+
+## Scope
+
+[What's in for the first version? What's explicitly out?
+Keep this tight — it's a boundary document, not a feature list.]
+
+## Vision
+
+[Where does this go if it succeeds? What does it become in 2-3 years?
+Inspiring but grounded.]
+```
+
+## Adaptation Guidelines
+
+- **For B2B products:** Consider adding a "Buyer vs User" section if they're different people
+- **For platforms/marketplaces:** Consider a "Network Effects" or "Ecosystem" section
+- **For technical products:** May need a brief "Technical Approach" section (keep it high-level)
+- **For regulated industries:** Consider a "Compliance & Regulatory" section
+- **If scope is well-defined:** Merge "Scope" and "Vision" into "Roadmap Thinking"
+- **If the problem is well-known:** Shorten "The Problem" and expand "What Makes This Different"
+
+The brief should be 1-2 pages. If it's longer, you're putting in too much detail — that's what the distillate is for.

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/bmad-domain-research/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+---
+name: bmad-domain-research
+description: 'Conduct domain and industry research. Use when the user says "lets create a research report on [domain or industry]"'
+---
+
+Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/bmad-domain-research/bmad-skill-manifest.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+type: skill

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/bmad-domain-research/domain-steps/step-01-init.md

@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+# Domain Research Step 1: Domain Research Scope Confirmation
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user confirmation
+
+- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
+- ✅ FOCUS EXCLUSIVELY on confirming domain research scope and approach
+- 📋 YOU ARE A DOMAIN RESEARCH PLANNER, not content generator
+- 💬 ACKNOWLEDGE and CONFIRM understanding of domain research goals
+- 🔍 This is SCOPE CONFIRMATION ONLY - no web research yet
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
+- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after scope confirmation
+- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
+- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1]` before loading next step
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Research type = "domain" is already set
+- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - discovered from initial discussion
+- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - captured from initial discussion
+- Focus on industry/domain analysis with web research
+- Web search is required to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
+
+## YOUR TASK:
+
+Confirm domain research scope and approach for **{{research_topic}}** with the user's goals in mind.
+
+## DOMAIN SCOPE CONFIRMATION:
+
+### 1. Begin Scope Confirmation
+
+Start with domain scope understanding:
+"I understand you want to conduct **domain research** for **{{research_topic}}** with these goals: {{research_goals}}
+
+**Domain Research Scope:**
+
+- **Industry Analysis**: Industry structure, market dynamics, and competitive landscape
+- **Regulatory Environment**: Compliance requirements, regulations, and standards
+- **Technology Patterns**: Innovation trends, technology adoption, and digital transformation
+- **Economic Factors**: Market size, growth trends, and economic impact
+- **Supply Chain**: Value chain analysis and ecosystem relationships
+
+**Research Approach:**
+
+- All claims verified against current public sources
+- Multi-source validation for critical domain claims
+- Confidence levels for uncertain domain information
+- Comprehensive domain coverage with industry-specific insights
+
+### 2. Scope Confirmation
+
+Present clear scope confirmation:
+"**Domain Research Scope Confirmation:**
+
+For **{{research_topic}}**, I will research:
+
+✅ **Industry Analysis** - market structure, key players, competitive dynamics
+✅ **Regulatory Requirements** - compliance standards, legal frameworks
+✅ **Technology Trends** - innovation patterns, digital transformation
+✅ **Economic Factors** - market size, growth projections, economic impact
+✅ **Supply Chain Analysis** - value chain, ecosystem, partnerships
+
+**All claims verified against current public sources.**
+
+**Does this domain research scope and approach align with your goals?**
+[C] Continue - Begin domain research with this scope
+
+### 3. Handle Continue Selection
+
+#### If 'C' (Continue):
+
+- Document scope confirmation in research file
+- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1]`
+- Load: `./step-02-domain-analysis.md`
+
+## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
+
+When user selects 'C', append scope confirmation:
+
+```markdown
+## Domain Research Scope Confirmation
+
+**Research Topic:** {{research_topic}}
+**Research Goals:** {{research_goals}}
+
+**Domain Research Scope:**
+
+- Industry Analysis - market structure, competitive landscape
+- Regulatory Environment - compliance requirements, legal frameworks
+- Technology Trends - innovation patterns, digital transformation
+- Economic Factors - market size, growth projections
+- Supply Chain Analysis - value chain, ecosystem relationships
+
+**Research Methodology:**
+
+- All claims verified against current public sources
+- Multi-source validation for critical domain claims
+- Confidence level framework for uncertain information
+- Comprehensive domain coverage with industry-specific insights
+
+**Scope Confirmed:** {{date}}
+```
+
+## SUCCESS METRICS:
+
+✅ Domain research scope clearly confirmed with user
+✅ All domain analysis areas identified and explained
+✅ Research methodology emphasized
+✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
+✅ Scope confirmation documented when user proceeds
+✅ Proper routing to next domain research step
+
+## FAILURE MODES:
+
+❌ Not clearly confirming domain research scope with user
+❌ Missing critical domain analysis areas
+❌ Not explaining that web search is required for current facts
+❌ Not presenting [C] continue option
+❌ Proceeding without user scope confirmation
+❌ Not routing to next domain research step
+
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
+
+## NEXT STEP:
+
+After user selects 'C', load `./step-02-domain-analysis.md` to begin industry analysis.
+
+Remember: This is SCOPE CONFIRMATION ONLY - no actual domain research yet, just confirming the research approach and scope!

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/bmad-domain-research/domain-steps/step-02-domain-analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
+# Domain Research Step 2: Industry Analysis
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
+
+- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
+- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
+- 📋 YOU ARE AN INDUSTRY ANALYST, not content generator
+- 💬 FOCUS on market size, growth, and industry dynamics
+- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
+- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
+- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after industry analysis content generation
+- 📝 WRITE INDUSTRY ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
+- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
+- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]` before loading next step
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Current document and frontmatter from step-01 are available
+- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
+- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
+- Focus on market size, growth, and industry dynamics
+- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
+
+## YOUR TASK:
+
+Conduct industry analysis focusing on market size, growth, and industry dynamics. Search the web to verify and supplement current facts.
+
+## INDUSTRY ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
+
+### 1. Begin Industry Analysis
+
+**UTILIZE SUBPROCESSES AND SUBAGENTS**: Use research subagents, subprocesses or parallel processing if available to thoroughly analyze different industry areas simultaneously and thoroughly.
+
+Start with industry research approach:
+"Now I'll conduct **industry analysis** for **{{research_topic}}** to understand market dynamics.
+
+**Industry Analysis Focus:**
+
+- Market size and valuation metrics
+- Growth rates and market dynamics
+- Market segmentation and structure
+- Industry trends and evolution patterns
+- Economic impact and value creation
+
+**Let me search for current industry insights.**"
+
+### 2. Parallel Industry Research Execution
+
+**Execute multiple web searches simultaneously:**
+
+Search the web: "{{research_topic}} market size value"
+Search the web: "{{research_topic}} market growth rate dynamics"
+Search the web: "{{research_topic}} market segmentation structure"
+Search the web: "{{research_topic}} industry trends evolution"
+
+**Analysis approach:**
+
+- Look for recent market research reports and industry analyses
+- Search for authoritative sources (market research firms, industry associations)
+- Identify market size, growth rates, and segmentation data
+- Research industry trends and evolution patterns
+- Analyze economic impact and value creation metrics
+
+### 3. Analyze and Aggregate Results
+
+**Collect and analyze findings from all parallel searches:**
+
+"After executing comprehensive parallel web searches, let me analyze and aggregate industry findings:
+
+**Research Coverage:**
+
+- Market size and valuation analysis
+- Growth rates and market dynamics
+- Market segmentation and structure
+- Industry trends and evolution patterns
+
+**Cross-Industry Analysis:**
+[Identify patterns connecting market dynamics, segmentation, and trends]
+
+**Quality Assessment:**
+[Overall confidence levels and research gaps identified]"
+
+### 4. Generate Industry Analysis Content
+
+**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
+
+Prepare industry analysis with web search citations:
+
+#### Content Structure:
+
+When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
+
+```markdown
+## Industry Analysis
+
+### Market Size and Valuation
+
+[Market size analysis with source citations]
+_Total Market Size: [Current market valuation]_
+_Growth Rate: [CAGR and market growth projections]_
+_Market Segments: [Size and value of key market segments]_
+_Economic Impact: [Economic contribution and value creation]_
+_Source: [URL]_
+
+### Market Dynamics and Growth
+
+[Market dynamics analysis with source citations]
+_Growth Drivers: [Key factors driving market growth]_
+_Growth Barriers: [Factors limiting market expansion]_
+_Cyclical Patterns: [Industry seasonality and cycles]_
+_Market Maturity: [Life cycle stage and development phase]_
+_Source: [URL]_
+
+### Market Structure and Segmentation
+
+[Market structure analysis with source citations]
+_Primary Segments: [Key market segments and their characteristics]_
+_Sub-segment Analysis: [Detailed breakdown of market sub-segments]_
+_Geographic Distribution: [Regional market variations and concentrations]_
+_Vertical Integration: [Supply chain and value chain structure]_
+_Source: [URL]_
+
+### Industry Trends and Evolution
+
+[Industry trends analysis with source citations]
+_Emerging Trends: [Current industry developments and transformations]_
+_Historical Evolution: [Industry development over recent years]_
+_Technology Integration: [How technology is changing the industry]_
+_Future Outlook: [Projected industry developments and changes]_
+_Source: [URL]_
+
+### Competitive Dynamics
+
+[Competitive dynamics analysis with source citations]
+_Market Concentration: [Level of market consolidation and competition]_
+_Competitive Intensity: [Degree of competition and rivalry]_
+_Barriers to Entry: [Obstacles for new market entrants]_
+_Innovation Pressure: [Rate of innovation and change]_
+_Source: [URL]_
+```
+
+### 5. Present Analysis and Continue Option
+
+**Show analysis and present continue option:**
+
+"I've completed **industry analysis** for {{research_topic}}.
+
+**Key Industry Findings:**
+
+- Market size and valuation thoroughly analyzed
+- Growth dynamics and market structure documented
+- Industry trends and evolution patterns identified
+- Competitive dynamics clearly mapped
+- Multiple sources verified for critical insights
+
+**Ready to proceed to competitive landscape analysis?**
+[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to competitive landscape
+
+### 6. Handle Continue Selection
+
+#### If 'C' (Continue):
+
+- **CONTENT ALREADY WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT**
+- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]`
+- Load: `./step-03-competitive-landscape.md`
+
+## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
+
+Content is already written to document when generated in step 4. No additional append needed.
+
+## SUCCESS METRICS:
+
+✅ Market size and valuation thoroughly analyzed
+✅ Growth dynamics and market structure documented
+✅ Industry trends and evolution patterns identified
+✅ Competitive dynamics clearly mapped
+✅ Multiple sources verified for critical insights
+✅ Content written immediately to document
+✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
+✅ Proper routing to next step (competitive landscape)
+✅ Research goals alignment maintained
+
+## FAILURE MODES:
+
+❌ Relying on training data instead of web search for current facts
+❌ Missing critical market size or growth data
+❌ Incomplete market structure analysis
+❌ Not identifying key industry trends
+❌ Not writing content immediately to document
+❌ Not presenting [C] continue option after content generation
+❌ Not routing to competitive landscape step
+
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
+❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
+
+## INDUSTRY RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
+
+- Research market research reports and industry analyses
+- Use authoritative sources (market research firms, industry associations)
+- Analyze market size, growth rates, and segmentation data
+- Study industry trends and evolution patterns
+- Search the web to verify facts
+- Present conflicting information when sources disagree
+- Apply confidence levels appropriately
+
+## INDUSTRY ANALYSIS STANDARDS:
+
+- Always cite URLs for web search results
+- Use authoritative industry research sources
+- Note data currency and potential limitations
+- Present multiple perspectives when sources conflict
+- Apply confidence levels to uncertain data
+- Focus on actionable industry insights
+
+## NEXT STEP:
+
+After user selects 'C', load `./step-03-competitive-landscape.md` to analyze competitive landscape, key players, and ecosystem analysis for {{research_topic}}.
+
+Remember: Always write research content to document immediately and search the web to verify facts!