frappe-builder 1.1.0-dev.8

package/_bmad/core/skills/bmad-distillator/agents/round-trip-reconstructor.md

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+# Round-Trip Reconstructor Agent
+
+Act as a document reconstruction specialist. Your purpose is to prove a distillate's completeness by reconstructing the original source documents from the distillate alone.
+
+**Critical constraint:** You receive ONLY the distillate file path. You must NOT have access to the original source documents. If you can see the originals, the test is meaningless.
+
+## Process
+
+### Step 1: Analyze the Distillate
+
+Read the distillate file. Parse the YAML frontmatter to identify:
+- The `sources` list — what documents were distilled
+- The `downstream_consumer` — what filtering may have been applied
+- The `parts` count — whether this is a single or split distillate
+
+### Step 2: Detect Document Types
+
+From the source file names and the distillate's content, infer what type of document each source was:
+- Product brief, discovery notes, research report, architecture doc, PRD, etc.
+- Use the naming conventions and content themes to determine appropriate document structure
+
+### Step 3: Reconstruct Each Source
+
+For each source listed in the frontmatter, produce a full human-readable document:
+
+- Use appropriate prose, structure, and formatting for the document type
+- Include all sections the original document would have had based on the document type
+- Expand compressed bullets back into natural language prose
+- Restore section transitions and contextual framing
+- Do NOT invent information — only use what is in the distillate
+- Flag any places where the distillate felt insufficient with `[POSSIBLE GAP]` markers — these are critical quality signals
+
+**Quality signals to watch for:**
+- Bullets that feel like they're missing context → `[POSSIBLE GAP: missing context for X]`
+- Themes that seem underrepresented given the document type → `[POSSIBLE GAP: expected more on X for a document of this type]`
+- Relationships that are mentioned but not fully explained → `[POSSIBLE GAP: relationship between X and Y unclear]`
+
+### Step 4: Save Reconstructions
+
+Save each reconstructed document as a temporary file adjacent to the distillate:
+- First source: `{distillate-basename}-reconstruction-1.md`
+- Second source: `{distillate-basename}-reconstruction-2.md`
+- And so on for each source
+
+Each reconstruction should include a header noting it was reconstructed:
+
+```markdown
+---
+type: distillate-reconstruction
+source_distillate: "{distillate path}"
+reconstructed_from: "{original source name}"
+reconstruction_number: {N}
+---
+```
+
+### Step 5: Return
+
+Return a structured result to the calling skill:
+
+```json
+{
+  "reconstruction_files": ["{path1}", "{path2}"],
+  "possible_gaps": ["gap description 1", "gap description 2"],
+  "source_count": N
+}
+```
+
+Do not include conversational text, status updates, or preamble — return only the structured result.

package/_bmad/core/skills/bmad-distillator/bmad-skill-manifest.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+type: skill
+module: core
+capabilities:
+  - name: bmad-distillator
+    menu-code: DSTL
+    description: "Produces lossless LLM-optimized distillate from source documents. Use after producing large human presentable documents that will be consumed later by LLMs"
+    supports-headless: true
+    input: source documents
+    args: output, validate
+    output: single distillate or folder of distillates next to source input
+    config-vars-used: null
+    phase: anytime
+    before: []
+    after: []
+    is-required: false

package/_bmad/core/skills/bmad-distillator/resources/compression-rules.md

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+# Compression Rules
+
+These rules govern how source text is compressed into distillate format. Apply as a final pass over all output.
+
+## Strip — Remove entirely
+
+- Prose transitions: "As mentioned earlier", "It's worth noting", "In addition to this"
+- Rhetoric and persuasion: "This is a game-changer", "The exciting thing is"
+- Hedging: "We believe", "It's likely that", "Perhaps", "It seems"
+- Self-reference: "This document describes", "As outlined above"
+- Common knowledge explanations: "Vercel is a cloud platform company", "MIT is an open-source license", "JSON is a data interchange format"
+- Repeated introductions of the same concept
+- Section transition paragraphs
+- Formatting-only elements (decorative bold/italic for emphasis, horizontal rules for visual breaks)
+- Filler phrases: "In order to", "It should be noted that", "The fact that"
+
+## Preserve — Keep always
+
+- Specific numbers, dates, versions, percentages
+- Named entities (products, companies, people, technologies)
+- Decisions made and their rationale (compressed: "Decision: X. Reason: Y")
+- Rejected alternatives and why (compressed: "Rejected: X. Reason: Y")
+- Explicit constraints and non-negotiables
+- Dependencies and ordering relationships
+- Open questions and unresolved items
+- Scope boundaries (in/out/deferred)
+- Success criteria and how they're validated
+- User segments and what success means for each
+- Risks with their severity signals
+- Conflicts between source documents
+
+## Transform — Change form for efficiency
+
+- Long prose paragraphs → single dense bullet capturing the same information
+- "We decided to use X because Y and Z" → "X (rationale: Y, Z)"
+- Repeated category labels → group under a single heading, no per-item labels
+- "Risk: ... Severity: high" → "HIGH RISK: ..."
+- Conditional statements → "If X → Y" form
+- Multi-sentence explanations → semicolon-separated compressed form
+- Lists of related short items → single bullet with semicolons
+- "X is used for Y" → "X: Y" when context is clear
+- Verbose enumerations → parenthetical lists: "platforms (Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, Copilot)"
+
+## Deduplication Rules
+
+- Same fact in multiple documents → keep the version with most context
+- Same concept at different detail levels → keep the detailed version
+- Overlapping lists → merge into single list, no duplicates
+- When source documents disagree → note the conflict explicitly: "Brief says X; discovery notes say Y — unresolved"
+- Executive summary points that are expanded elsewhere → keep only the expanded version
+- Introductory framing repeated across sections → capture once under the most relevant theme

package/_bmad/core/skills/bmad-distillator/resources/distillate-format-reference.md

@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+# Distillate Format Reference
+
+Examples showing the transformation from human-readable source content to distillate format.
+
+## Frontmatter
+
+Every distillate includes YAML frontmatter. Source paths are relative to the distillate's location so the distillate remains portable:
+
+```yaml
+---
+type: bmad-distillate
+sources:
+  - "product-brief-example.md"
+  - "product-brief-example-discovery-notes.md"
+downstream_consumer: "PRD creation"
+created: "2026-03-13"
+token_estimate: 1200
+parts: 1
+---
+```
+
+## Before/After Examples
+
+### Prose Paragraph to Dense Bullet
+
+**Before** (human-readable brief excerpt):
+```
+## What Makes This Different
+
+**The anti-fragmentation layer.** The AI tooling space is fracturing across 40+
+platforms with no shared methodology layer. BMAD is uniquely positioned to be the
+cross-platform constant — the structured approach that works the same in Cursor,
+Claude Code, Windsurf, Copilot, and whatever launches next month. Every other
+methodology or skill framework maintains its own platform support matrix. By
+building on the open-source skills CLI ecosystem, BMAD offloads the highest-churn
+maintenance burden and focuses on what actually differentiates it: the methodology
+itself.
+```
+
+**After** (distillate):
+```
+## Differentiation
+- Anti-fragmentation positioning: BMAD = cross-platform constant across 40+ fragmenting AI tools; no competitor provides shared methodology layer
+- Platform complexity delegated to Vercel skills CLI ecosystem (MIT); BMAD maintains methodology, not platform configs
+```
+
+### Technical Details to Compressed Facts
+
+**Before** (discovery notes excerpt):
+```
+## Competitive Landscape
+
+- **Vercel Skills.sh**: 83K+ skills, 18 agents, largest curated leaderboard —
+  but dev-only, skills trigger unreliably (20% without explicit prompting)
+- **SkillsMP**: 400K+ skills directory, pure aggregator with no curation or CLI
+- **ClawHub/OpenClaw**: ~3.2K curated skills with versioning/rollback, small ecosystem
+- **Lindy**: No-code AI agent builder for business automation — closed platform,
+  no skill sharing
+- **Microsoft Copilot Studio**: Enterprise no-code agent builder — vendor-locked
+  to Microsoft
+- **MindStudio**: No-code AI agent platform — siloed, no interoperability
+- **Make/Zapier AI**: Workflow automation adding AI agents — workflow-centric,
+  not methodology-centric
+- **Key gap**: NO competitor combines structured methodology with plugin
+  marketplace — this is BMAD's whitespace
+```
+
+**After** (distillate):
+```
+## Competitive Landscape
+- No competitor combines structured methodology + plugin marketplace (whitespace)
+- Skills.sh (Vercel): 83K skills, 18 agents, dev-only, 20% trigger reliability
+- SkillsMP: 400K skills, aggregator only, no curation/CLI
+- ClawHub: 3.2K curated, versioning, small ecosystem
+- No-code platforms (Lindy, Copilot Studio, MindStudio, Make/Zapier): closed/siloed, no skill portability, business-only
+```
+
+### Deduplication Across Documents
+
+When the same fact appears in both a brief and discovery notes:
+
+**Brief says:**
+```
+bmad-init must always be included as a base skill in every bundle
+```
+
+**Discovery notes say:**
+```
+bmad-init must always be included as a base skill in every bundle/install
+(solves bootstrapping problem)
+```
+
+**Distillate keeps the more contextual version:**
+```
+- bmad-init: always included as base skill in every bundle (solves bootstrapping)
+```
+
+### Decision/Rationale Compression
+
+**Before:**
+```
+We decided not to build our own platform support matrix going forward, instead
+delegating to the Vercel skills CLI ecosystem. The rationale is that maintaining
+20+ platform configs is the biggest maintenance burden and it's unsustainable
+at 40+ platforms.
+```
+
+**After:**
+```
+- Rejected: own platform support matrix. Reason: unsustainable at 40+ platforms; delegate to Vercel CLI ecosystem
+```
+
+## Full Example
+
+A complete distillate produced from a product brief and its discovery notes, targeted at PRD creation:
+
+```markdown
+---
+type: bmad-distillate
+sources:
+  - "product-brief-bmad-next-gen-installer.md"
+  - "product-brief-bmad-next-gen-installer-discovery-notes.md"
+downstream_consumer: "PRD creation"
+created: "2026-03-13"
+token_estimate: 1450
+parts: 1
+---
+
+## Core Concept
+- BMAD Next-Gen Installer: replaces monolithic Node.js CLI with skill-based plugin architecture for distributing BMAD methodology across 40+ AI platforms
+- Three layers: self-describing plugins (bmad-manifest.json), cross-platform install via Vercel skills CLI (MIT), runtime registration via bmad-init skill
+- Transforms BMAD from dev-only methodology into open platform for any domain (creative, therapeutic, educational, personal)
+
+## Problem
+- Current installer maintains ~20 platform configs manually; each platform convention change requires installer update, test, release — largest maintenance burden on team
+- Node.js/npm required — blocks non-technical users on UI-based platforms (Claude Co-Work, etc.)
+- CSV manifests are static, generated once at install; no runtime scanning/registration
+- Unsustainable at 40+ platforms; new tools launching weekly
+
+## Solution Architecture
+- Plugins: skill bundles with Anthropic plugin standard as base format + bmad-manifest.json extending for BMAD-specific metadata (installer options, capabilities, help integration, phase ordering, dependencies)
+- Existing manifest example: `{"module-code":"bmm","replaces-skill":"bmad-create-product-brief","capabilities":[{"name":"create-brief","menu-code":"CB","supports-headless":true,"phase-name":"1-analysis","after":["brainstorming"],"before":["create-prd"],"is-required":true}]}`
+- Vercel skills CLI handles platform translation; integration pattern (wrap/fork/call) is PRD decision
+- bmad-init: global skill scanning installed bmad-manifest.json files, registering capabilities, configuring project settings; always included as base skill in every bundle (solves bootstrapping)
+- bmad-update: plugin update path without full reinstall; technical approach (diff/replace/preserve customizations) is PRD decision
+- Distribution tiers: (1) NPX installer wrapping skills CLI for technical users, (2) zip bundle + platform-specific README for non-technical users, (3) future marketplace
+- Non-technical path has honest friction: "copy to right folder" requires knowing where; per-platform README instructions; improves over time as low-code space matures
+
+## Differentiation
+- Anti-fragmentation: BMAD = cross-platform constant; no competitor provides shared methodology layer across AI tools
+- Curated quality: all submissions gated, human-reviewed by BMad + core team; 13.4% of community skills have critical vulnerabilities (Snyk 2026); quality gate value increases as ecosystem gets noisier
+- Domain-agnostic: no competitor builds beyond software dev workflows; same plugin system powers any domain via BMAD Builder (separate initiative)
+
+## Users (ordered by v1 priority)
+- Module authors (primary v1): package/test/distribute plugins independently without installer changes
+- Developers: single-command install on any of 40+ platforms via NPX
+- Non-technical users: install without Node/Git/terminal; emerging segment including PMs, designers, educators
+- Future plugin creators: non-dev authors using BMAD Builder; need distribution without building own installer
+
+## Success Criteria
+- Zero (or near-zero) custom platform directory code; delegated to skills CLI ecosystem
+- Installation verified on top platforms by volume; skills CLI handles long tail
+- Non-technical install path validated with non-developer users
+- bmad-init discovers/registers all plugins from manifests; clear errors for malformed manifests
+- At least one external module author successfully publishes plugin using manifest system
+- bmad-update works without full reinstall
+- Existing CLI users have documented migration path
+
+## Scope
+- In: manifest spec, bmad-init, bmad-update, Vercel CLI integration, NPX installer, zip bundles, migration path
+- Out: BMAD Builder, marketplace web platform, skill conversion (prerequisite, separate), one-click install for all platforms, monetization, quality certification process (gated-submission principle is architectural requirement; process defined separately)
+- Deferred: CI/CD integration, telemetry for module authors, air-gapped enterprise install, zip bundle integrity verification (checksums/signing), deeper non-technical platform integrations
+
+## Current Installer (migration context)
+- Entry: `tools/cli/bmad-cli.js` (Commander.js) → `tools/cli/installers/lib/core/installer.js`
+- Platforms: `platform-codes.yaml` (~20 platforms with target dirs, legacy dirs, template types, special flags)
+- Manifests: CSV files (skill/workflow/agent-manifest.csv) are current source of truth, not JSON
+- External modules: `external-official-modules.yaml` (CIS, GDS, TEA, WDS) from npm with semver
+- Dependencies: 4-pass resolver (collect → parse → resolve → transitive); YAML-declared only
+- Config: prompts for name, communication language, document output language, output folder
+- Skills already use directory-per-skill layout; bmad-manifest.json sidecars exist but are not source of truth
+- Key shift: CSV-based static manifests → JSON-based runtime scanning
+
+## Vercel Skills CLI
+- `npx skills add <source>` — GitHub, GitLab, local paths, git URLs
+- 40+ agents; per-agent path mappings; symlinks (recommended) or copies
+- Scopes: project-level or global
+- Discovery: `skills/`, `.agents/skills/`, agent-specific paths, `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`
+- Commands: add, list, find, remove, check, update, init
+- Non-interactive: `-y`, `--all` flags for CI/CD
+
+## Competitive Landscape
+- No competitor combines structured methodology + plugin marketplace (whitespace)
+- Skills.sh (Vercel): 83K skills, dev-only, 20% trigger reliability without explicit prompting
+- SkillsMP: 400K skills, aggregator only, no curation
+- ClawHub: 3.2K curated, versioning, small
+- No-code platforms (Lindy, Copilot Studio, MindStudio, Make/Zapier): closed/siloed, no skill portability, business-only
+- Market: $7.84B (2025) → $52.62B (2030); Agent Skills spec ~4 months old, 351K+ skills; standards converging under Linux Foundation AAIF (MCP, AGENTS.md, A2A)
+
+## Rejected Alternatives
+- Building own platform support matrix: unsustainable at 40+; delegate to Vercel ecosystem
+- One-click install for non-technical v1: emerging space; guidance-based, improve over time
+- Prior roadmap/brainstorming: clean start, unconstrained by previous planning
+
+## Open Questions
+- Vercel CLI integration pattern: wrap/fork/call/peer dependency?
+- bmad-update mechanics: diff/replace? Preserve user customizations?
+- Migration story: command/manual reinstall/compatibility shim?
+- Cross-platform testing: CI matrix for top N? Community testing for rest?
+- bmad-manifest.json as open standard submission to Agent Skills governance?
+- Platforms NOT supported by Vercel skills CLI?
+- Manifest versioning strategy for backward compatibility?
+- Plugin author getting-started experience and tooling?
+
+## Opportunities
+- Module authors as acquisition channel: each published plugin distributes BMAD to creator's audience
+- CI/CD integration: bmad-init as pipeline one-liner increases stickiness
+- Educational institutions: structured methodology + non-technical install → university AI curriculum
+- Skill composability: mixing BMAD modules with third-party skills for custom methodology stacks
+
+## Risks
+- Manifest format evolution creates versioning/compatibility burden once third-party authors publish
+- Quality gate needs defined process, not just claim — gated review model addresses
+- 40+ platform testing environments even with Vercel handling translation
+- Scope creep pressure from marketplace vision (explicitly excluded but primary long-term value)
+- Vercel dependency: minor supply-chain risk; MIT license allows fork if deprioritized
+```

package/_bmad/core/skills/bmad-distillator/resources/splitting-strategy.md

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+# Semantic Splitting Strategy
+
+When the source content is large (exceeds ~15,000 tokens) or a token_budget requires it, split the distillate into semantically coherent sections rather than arbitrary size breaks.
+
+## Why Semantic Over Size-Based
+
+Arbitrary splits (every N tokens) break coherence. A downstream workflow loading "part 2 of 4" gets context fragments. Semantic splits produce self-contained topic clusters that a workflow can load selectively — "give me just the technical decisions section" — which is more useful and more token-efficient for the consumer.
+
+## Splitting Process
+
+### 1. Identify Natural Boundaries
+
+After the initial extraction and deduplication (Steps 1-2 of the compression process), look for natural semantic boundaries:
+- Distinct problem domains or functional areas
+- Different stakeholder perspectives (users, technical, business)
+- Temporal boundaries (current state vs future vision)
+- Scope boundaries (in-scope vs out-of-scope vs deferred)
+- Phase boundaries (analysis, design, implementation)
+
+Choose boundaries that produce sections a downstream workflow might load independently.
+
+### 2. Assign Items to Sections
+
+For each extracted item, assign it to the most relevant section. Items that span multiple sections go in the root distillate.
+
+Cross-cutting items (items relevant to multiple sections):
+- Constraints that affect all areas → root distillate
+- Decisions with broad impact → root distillate
+- Section-specific decisions → section distillate
+
+### 3. Produce Root Distillate
+
+The root distillate contains:
+- **Orientation** (3-5 bullets): what was distilled, from what sources, for what consumer, how many sections
+- **Cross-references**: list of section distillates with 1-line descriptions
+- **Cross-cutting items**: facts, decisions, and constraints that span multiple sections
+- **Scope summary**: high-level in/out/deferred if applicable
+
+### 4. Produce Section Distillates
+
+Each section distillate must be self-sufficient — a reader loading only one section should understand it without the others.
+
+Each section includes:
+- **Context header** (1 line): "This section covers [topic]. Part N of M from [source document names]."
+- **Section content**: thematically-grouped bullets following the same compression rules as a single distillate
+- **Cross-references** (if needed): pointers to other sections for related content
+
+### 5. Output Structure
+
+Create a folder `{base-name}-distillate/` containing:
+
+```
+{base-name}-distillate/
+├── _index.md           # Root distillate: orientation, cross-cutting items, section manifest
+├── 01-{topic-slug}.md  # Self-contained section
+├── 02-{topic-slug}.md
+└── 03-{topic-slug}.md
+```
+
+Example:
+```
+product-brief-distillate/
+├── _index.md
+├── 01-problem-solution.md
+├── 02-technical-decisions.md
+└── 03-users-market.md
+```
+
+## Size Targets
+
+When a token_budget is specified:
+- Root distillate: ~20% of budget (orientation + cross-cutting items)
+- Remaining budget split proportionally across sections based on content density
+- If a section exceeds its proportional share, compress more aggressively or sub-split
+
+When no token_budget but splitting is needed:
+- Aim for sections of 3,000-5,000 tokens each
+- Root distillate as small as possible while remaining useful standalone

package/_bmad/core/skills/bmad-editorial-review-prose/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+---
+name: bmad-editorial-review-prose
+description: 'Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose'
+---
+
+Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.

package/_bmad/core/skills/bmad-editorial-review-prose/bmad-skill-manifest.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+type: skill

package/_bmad/core/skills/bmad-editorial-review-prose/workflow.md

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+# Editorial Review - Prose
+
+**Goal:** Review text for communication issues that impede comprehension and output suggested fixes in a three-column table.
+
+**Your Role:** You are a clinical copy-editor: precise, professional, neither warm nor cynical. Apply Microsoft Writing Style Guide principles as your baseline. Focus on communication issues that impede comprehension — not style preferences. NEVER rewrite for preference — only fix genuine issues. Follow ALL steps in the STEPS section IN EXACT ORDER. DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence. HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met. Each action within a step is a REQUIRED action to complete that step.
+
+**CONTENT IS SACROSANCT:** Never challenge ideas — only clarify how they're expressed.
+
+**Inputs:**
+- **content** (required) — Cohesive unit of text to review (markdown, plain text, or text-heavy XML)
+- **style_guide** (optional) — Project-specific style guide. When provided, overrides all generic principles in this task (except CONTENT IS SACROSANCT). The style guide is the final authority on tone, structure, and language choices.
+- **reader_type** (optional, default: `humans`) — `humans` for standard editorial, `llm` for precision focus
+
+
+## PRINCIPLES
+
+1. **Minimal intervention:** Apply the smallest fix that achieves clarity
+2. **Preserve structure:** Fix prose within existing structure, never restructure
+3. **Skip code/markup:** Detect and skip code blocks, frontmatter, structural markup
+4. **When uncertain:** Flag with a query rather than suggesting a definitive change
+5. **Deduplicate:** Same issue in multiple places = one entry with locations listed
+6. **No conflicts:** Merge overlapping fixes into single entries
+7. **Respect author voice:** Preserve intentional stylistic choices
+
+> **STYLE GUIDE OVERRIDE:** If a style_guide input is provided, it overrides ALL generic principles in this task (including the Microsoft Writing Style Guide baseline and reader_type-specific priorities). The ONLY exception is CONTENT IS SACROSANCT — never change what ideas say, only how they're expressed. When style guide conflicts with this task, style guide wins.
+
+
+## STEPS
+
+### Step 1: Validate Input
+
+- Check if content is empty or contains fewer than 3 words
+  - If empty or fewer than 3 words: **HALT** with error: "Content too short for editorial review (minimum 3 words required)"
+- Validate reader_type is `humans` or `llm` (or not provided, defaulting to `humans`)
+  - If reader_type is invalid: **HALT** with error: "Invalid reader_type. Must be 'humans' or 'llm'"
+- Identify content type (markdown, plain text, XML with text)
+- Note any code blocks, frontmatter, or structural markup to skip
+
+### Step 2: Analyze Style
+
+- Analyze the style, tone, and voice of the input text
+- Note any intentional stylistic choices to preserve (informal tone, technical jargon, rhetorical patterns)
+- Calibrate review approach based on reader_type:
+  - If `llm`: Prioritize unambiguous references, consistent terminology, explicit structure, no hedging
+  - If `humans`: Prioritize clarity, flow, readability, natural progression
+
+### Step 3: Editorial Review (CRITICAL)
+
+- If style_guide provided: Consult style_guide now and note its key requirements — these override default principles for this review
+- Review all prose sections (skip code blocks, frontmatter, structural markup)
+- Identify communication issues that impede comprehension
+- For each issue, determine the minimal fix that achieves clarity
+- Deduplicate: If same issue appears multiple times, create one entry listing all locations
+- Merge overlapping issues into single entries (no conflicting suggestions)
+- For uncertain fixes, phrase as query: "Consider: [suggestion]?" rather than definitive change
+- Preserve author voice — do not "improve" intentional stylistic choices
+
+### Step 4: Output Results
+
+- If issues found: Output a three-column markdown table with all suggested fixes
+- If no issues found: Output "No editorial issues identified"
+
+**Output format:**
+
+| Original Text | Revised Text | Changes |
+|---------------|--------------|---------|
+| The exact original passage | The suggested revision | Brief explanation of what changed and why |
+
+**Example:**
+
+| Original Text | Revised Text | Changes |
+|---------------|--------------|---------|
+| The system will processes data and it handles errors. | The system processes data and handles errors. | Fixed subject-verb agreement ("will processes" to "processes"); removed redundant "it" |
+| Users can chose from options (lines 12, 45, 78) | Users can choose from options | Fixed spelling: "chose" to "choose" (appears in 3 locations) |
+
+
+## HALT CONDITIONS
+
+- HALT with error if content is empty or fewer than 3 words
+- HALT with error if reader_type is not `humans` or `llm`
+- If no issues found after thorough review, output "No editorial issues identified" (this is valid completion, not an error)

package/_bmad/core/skills/bmad-editorial-review-structure/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+---
+name: bmad-editorial-review-structure
+description: 'Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification while preserving comprehension. Use when user requests structural review or editorial review of structure'
+---
+
+Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.

package/_bmad/core/skills/bmad-editorial-review-structure/bmad-skill-manifest.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+type: skill