fraim-framework 2.0.66 → 2.0.67

package/dist/registry/stubs/workflows/quality-assurance/browser-validation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# FRAIM Workflow: browser-validation
+
+> [!IMPORTANT]
+> This is a **FRAIM-managed workflow stub**. 
+> To load the full context (rules, templates, and execution steps), ask your AI agent to:
+> `@fraim get_fraim_workflow("browser-validation")`
+>
+> DO NOT EXECUTE.
+
+## Intent
+To systematically validate the application in a browser, identify issues, and iterate until production-ready through comprehensive browser testing.

package/dist/registry/stubs/workflows/quality-assurance/iterative-improvement-cycle.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# FRAIM Workflow: iterative-improvement-cycle
+
+> [!IMPORTANT]
+> This is a **FRAIM-managed workflow stub**. 
+> To load the full context (rules, templates, and execution steps), ask your AI agent to:
+> `@fraim get_fraim_workflow("iterative-improvement-cycle")`
+>
+> DO NOT EXECUTE.
+
+## Intent
+To systematically improve application quality through iterative cycles of Review → Critique → Fix → Validate, ensuring high-quality, production-ready applications.

package/dist/registry/stubs/workflows/replicate/replicate-discovery.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# FRAIM Workflow: replicate-discovery
+
+> [!IMPORTANT]
+> This is a **FRAIM-managed workflow stub**. 
+> To load the full context (rules, templates, and execution steps), ask your AI agent to:
+> `@fraim get_fraim_workflow("replicate-discovery")`
+>
+> DO NOT EXECUTE.
+
+## Intent
+To systematically discover, analyze, and document an existing web application for replication, producing a complete analysis package that can be converted into implementation issues.

package/dist/registry/stubs/workflows/replicate/replicate-to-issues.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# FRAIM Workflow: replicate-to-issues
+
+> [!IMPORTANT]
+> This is a **FRAIM-managed workflow stub**. 
+> To load the full context (rules, templates, and execution steps), ask your AI agent to:
+> `@fraim get_fraim_workflow("replicate-to-issues")`
+>
+> DO NOT EXECUTE.
+
+## Intent
+To convert comprehensive replication analysis into actionable GitHub issues that can be implemented through standard FRAIM workflows (spec → design → implement → test).

package/dist/registry/stubs/workflows/reviewer/review-implementation-vs-design-spec.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# FRAIM Workflow: review-implementation-vs-design-spec
+
+> [!IMPORTANT]
+> This is a **FRAIM-managed workflow stub**. 
+> To load the full context (rules, templates, and execution steps), ask your AI agent to:
+> `@fraim get_fraim_workflow("review-implementation-vs-design-spec")`
+>
+> DO NOT EXECUTE.
+
+## Intent
+To systematically verify that the implementation matches the approved technical design (RFC), ensuring **completeness**, **correctness**, and **quality** of all technical requirements, test cases, and validation scenarios.

package/dist/registry/stubs/workflows/reviewer/review-implementation-vs-feature-spec.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# FRAIM Workflow: review-implementation-vs-feature-spec
+
+> [!IMPORTANT]
+> This is a **FRAIM-managed workflow stub**. 
+> To load the full context (rules, templates, and execution steps), ask your AI agent to:
+> `@fraim get_fraim_workflow("review-implementation-vs-feature-spec")`
+>
+> DO NOT EXECUTE.
+
+## Intent
+To systematically verify that the implementation solves the customer problem and delivers the user experience described in the feature spec, ensuring **completeness**, **correctness**, and **quality** of functional requirements and user value.

package/dist/registry/stubs/workflows/startup-credits/aws-activate-application.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# FRAIM Workflow: aws-activate-application
+
+> [!IMPORTANT]
+> This is a **FRAIM-managed workflow stub**. 
+> To load the full context (rules, templates, and execution steps), ask your AI agent to:
+> `@fraim get_fraim_workflow("aws-activate-application")`
+>
+> DO NOT EXECUTE.
+
+## Intent
+No intent defined.

package/dist/registry/stubs/workflows/startup-credits/google-cloud-application.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# FRAIM Workflow: google-cloud-application
+
+> [!IMPORTANT]
+> This is a **FRAIM-managed workflow stub**. 
+> To load the full context (rules, templates, and execution steps), ask your AI agent to:
+> `@fraim get_fraim_workflow("google-cloud-application")`
+>
+> DO NOT EXECUTE.
+
+## Intent
+No intent defined.

package/dist/registry/stubs/workflows/startup-credits/microsoft-azure-application.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# FRAIM Workflow: microsoft-azure-application
+
+> [!IMPORTANT]
+> This is a **FRAIM-managed workflow stub**. 
+> To load the full context (rules, templates, and execution steps), ask your AI agent to:
+> `@fraim get_fraim_workflow("microsoft-azure-application")`
+>
+> DO NOT EXECUTE.
+
+## Intent
+No intent defined.

package/dist/registry/templates/bootstrap/ARCHITECTURE-TEMPLATE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+# Architecture Documentation: <project-name>
+
+## 1. Overview
+<Briefly describe the purpose and goals of the project.>
+
+## 2. Tech Stack Choices
+
+| Category | Choice | Rationale |
+| :--- | :--- | :--- |
+| **Language** | <e.g. TypeScript> | <e.g. Type safety and developer productivity> |
+| **Runtime** | <e.g. Node.js> | <e.g. Ubiquity and ecosystem> |
+| **Frameworks** | <e.g. Express, Fastify, React> | <e.g. Robustness and community support> |
+| **Database** | <e.g. MongoDB, PostgreSQL> | <e.g. Data structure requirements> |
+| **Testing** | <e.g. Vitest, Playwright> | <e.g. Modern toolchain and speed> |
+
+## 3. Architectural Layers
+
+Describe the layers of the system and their responsibilities.
+
+### 3.1. [Layer Name, e.g., API/Interface Layer]
+- **Responsibility**: <e.g., Handling HTTP requests, validation, and CLI entry points.>
+- **Key Modules**: <e.g., `src/server.ts`, `src/cli/`>
+
+### 3.2. [Layer Name, e.g., Application/Business Logic Layer]
+- **Responsibility**: <e.g., Core business rules and orchestrating domain services.>
+- **Key Modules**: <e.g., `src/services/`, `src/orchestrator/`>
+
+### 3.3. [Layer Name, e.g., Data/Infrastructure Layer]
+- **Responsibility**: <e.g., Persistence, external API integrations, and low-level utilities.>
+- **Key Modules**: <e.g., `src/db/`, `src/clients/`>
+
+## 4. Key Components & Modules
+
+<mermaid>
+graph TD
+    A[Component A] --> B[Component B]
+    B --> C[External API]
+    B --> D[Database]
+</mermaid>
+
+### 4.1 [Component Name]
+<Description of the component's role and internal structure.>
+
+## 5. Data Flow
+<Describe how information moves through the system from an input (e.g., user request) to output/persistence.>
+
+## 6. Design Patterns & Principles
+- **Pattern 1**: <e.g., Dependency Injection for testability.>
+- **Pattern 2**: <e.g., Event-driven architecture for async processing.>
+
+## 7. Configuration & Environment
+- **FRAIM Config**: Located at `config.json`.
+- **Environment Variables**: <List critical variables here.>

package/dist/registry/templates/bootstrap/CODE-QUALITY-REPORT-TEMPLATE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# Code Quality Evaluation Report
+
+## Summary
+- **Evaluation Date**: <date>
+- **Project Name**: <project-name>
+- **Overall Quality Grade**: <grade> (A/B/C/D/F)
+
+## Key Characteristics
+
+### 1. Type Safety
+- **Gate 1 Status**: <status>
+- **Issues Found**:
+  - <issue-1>
+  - <issue-2>
+- **Recommendation**: <recommendation>
+
+### 2. Linting & Style
+- **Status**: <status>
+- **Warnings/Errors**: <count>
+- **Recommendation**: <recommendation>
+
+### 3. FRAIM Patterns & Architecture
+- **Architecture Alignment**: <status>
+- **Missing Documentation**: <list>
+- **Rule Violations**:
+  - <violation-1>
+
+### 4. Technical Debt
+- **Estimated Effort to Fix**: <hours>
+- **Top 3 Critical Issues**:
+  1. <issue-1>
+  2. <issue-2>
+  3. <issue-3>
+
+## Recommendations
+- [ ] <next-step-1>
+- [ ] <next-step-2>

package/dist/registry/templates/bootstrap/TEST-COVERAGE-REPORT-TEMPLATE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# Test Coverage & Effectiveness Report
+
+## Summary
+- **Evaluation Date**: <date>
+- **Total Scenarios Found**: <total>
+- **Scenario Coverage**: <percentage>%
+- **Line Coverage**: <percentage>%
+
+## Coverage Breakdown
+
+### 1. Scenario Coverage (Gate 9)
+- **Status**: <status>
+- **Covered Scenarios**:
+  - [x] <scenario-1>
+  - [x] <scenario-2>
+- **Missing Scenarios**:
+  - [ ] <missing-scenario-1>
+  - [ ] <missing-scenario-2>
+
+### 2. Code Coverage
+- **Lines**: <covered>/<total> (<percentage>%)
+- **Branches**: <covered>/<total> (<percentage>%)
+- **Functions**: <covered>/<total> (<percentage>%)
+
+### 3. Test Quality
+- **Tautological Tests (Gate 1.5)**: <count> found
+- **Mocking Health**: <assessment>
+
+## Risk Areas
+- **Unverified Critical Paths**: <list>
+- **Complexity without Tests**: <list>
+
+## Recommendations
+- [ ] <recommendation-1>
+- [ ] <recommendation-2>

package/dist/registry/templates/business-development/IDEATION-REPORT-TEMPLATE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# Ideation Report: [Product/Space Name]
+
+## 🎯 Executive Summary
+[1-2 sentences summarizing the core idea and its unique value prop.]
+
+## 🧭 Problem Space & Vision
+### The Problem
+[Describe the pain points being solved.]
+### The Vision
+[Describe the desired future state.]
+
+## 👥 Target Personas
+- **[Persona Name]**: [Description, Goals, Pain Points]
+
+## 🚀 Priority Feature Backlog
+| Feature | Description | Priority |
+| :--- | :--- | :--- |
+| [Feature Name] | [Brief detail] | [High/Med/Low] |
+
+## 📐 Conceptual Architecture
+[High-level description of how modules or agents might interact.]
+
+## 🧪 Next Steps
+- [ ] Transition to `prototype` for [Core Feature]
+- [ ] Create `spec` for [Highest Priority Feature]
+- [ ] Research [Specific Technical/Market Gap]
+
+---
+*Created via FRAIM Ideation Workflow*

package/dist/registry/templates/business-development/PRICING-STRATEGY-TEMPLATE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+# Pricing & Packaging Strategy — [Product Name]
+
+**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD  
+**Owner:** [Name/Team]  
+**Purpose:** Define SKUs, pricing, unit economics, and competitive positioning
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+- What we sell (one-liner)
+- Who buys (top 2–3 segments)
+- Recommended pricing metric
+- Recommended SKUs/tiers
+- Price list snapshot
+- Biggest risks + mitigations
+- Next 30 days plan
+
+---
+
+## Product Context
+- Core outcomes
+- Buyer vs user
+- Delivery model (SaaS / services / hybrid)
+- Constraints (margin targets, capacity, sales motion)
+
+---
+
+## Customer Segments (ICP)
+### Segment 1: [Name]
+- Job-to-be-done
+- Pain points
+- Alternatives today
+- Willingness to pay signals
+- Buying process & budget
+- Success metrics
+
+[Repeat for 3–7 segments]
+
+### Segment Comparison Table
+| Segment | Pain | Frequency | Budget Owner | WTP | Reach | Competition | Notes |
+|---|---:|---:|---|---:|---:|---:|---|
+
+---
+
+## Value Narrative (Why Before Pricing)
+- Headline value statement
+- Why outcomes vary (if relevant)
+- 3 adoption paths / maturity levels (optional)
+- CTA
+
+---
+
+## Packaging Architecture (SKUs + tiers)
+### SKU Catalog
+| SKU | Who it’s for | Primary outcomes | Included | Excludes | Success metrics |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+
+### Tier Comparison
+| Tier | Best for | Outcomes | Limits | Support | Upgrade triggers |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+
+---
+
+## Pricing Metric
+- Primary metric: [e.g., per seat / per workspace / per project / per run]
+- Why this metric fits value + predictability
+- Guardrails and anti-gaming
+- Secondary metrics (optional add-ons)
+
+---
+
+## Price List
+### Hero Table (simple first)
+|  | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| What you get | | | |
+| What you save/earn | | | |
+| What you pay | | | |
+
+### Add-ons
+| Add-on | What it includes | Who buys it | Price | Notes |
+|---|---|---|---:|---|
+
+### Discounts & Terms
+- annual/volume/enterprise terms
+
+---
+
+## Unit Economics
+### Assumptions
+| Driver | Assumption | Notes |
+|---|---|---|
+
+### Margin by SKU/Tier
+| SKU/Tier | ARPU/ACV | COGS | Gross Margin | Notes |
+|---|---:|---:|---:|---|
+
+### Scalability Constraints
+- staffing ratios (if services)
+- compute caps
+- support burden
+
+---
+
+## Competitive Landscape (with citations)
+### Competitor Matrix
+| Competitor | What they sell | Who buys | Pricing model | Strengths | Weaknesses | Win strategy |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+
+### Positioning & Talk Tracks
+- Differentiation pillars
+- Objections + responses
+- Win/loss summary
+
+---
+
+## Risks & Mitigations
+| Risk | Impact | Mitigation | Owner | Leading indicator |
+|---|---|---|---|---|
+
+---
+
+## Validation Plan (30/60/90)
+- experiments
+- metrics
+- decision points

package/dist/registry/templates/customer-development/customer-interview-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+# Customer Interview Template
+
+## Interview Preparation Section (AI Agent fills this before interview)
+
+### Customer Overview
+**Name**: [Full Name]  
+**Role**: [Current Title] at [Company]  
+**Location**: [City, State/Country]  
+**Experience**: [Years] at [Company], [Total] years in [Industry]  
+**Connection**: [Degree] degree connection with [X] mutual connections  
+
+### Professional Background
+
+#### Current Role ([Date] - Present)
+**[Title]** - [Company/Department]
+- **Mission**: [Key responsibilities and team focus]
+- **Team Leadership**: [Team size and management responsibilities]
+- **Key Responsibilities**: 
+  - [Specific responsibility 1]
+  - [Specific responsibility 2]
+  - [Specific responsibility 3]
+
+#### Previous Role ([Date] - [Date])
+**[Title]** - [Company/Department]
+- **Focus**: [Key focus areas and achievements]
+- **Key Products/Projects**: 
+  - [Product/Project 1]: [Description]
+  - [Product/Project 2]: [Description]
+- **Innovation**: [Key innovations or approaches]
+
+#### Career Progression
+- **[X] years at [Company]** ([Additional context])
+- **Technical Background**: [Background details]
+- **Enterprise Experience**: [Relevant experience]
+- **Product Creation**: [Notable products built]
+- **Education**: [Education background]
+
+### Key Insights for Interview
+
+#### Product Philosophy
+- **[Quote or philosophy from profile]**
+- **[Key mindset or approach]**
+- **[Customer-centric focus areas]**
+
+#### Technical & Business Acumen
+- **Hybrid Background**: [Technical + Business background]
+- **Enterprise Focus**: [Enterprise experience details]
+- **AI Integration**: [AI/Technology experience]
+- **Product-Led Growth**: [Growth and adoption expertise]
+
+#### Company Context
+- **Long Tenure**: [Company experience details]
+- **Current Focus**: [Current team and project focus]
+- **Hierarchy Awareness**: [Level and leadership context]
+- **Cross-Functional**: [Cross-functional experience]
+
+#### LinkedIn Activity Insights
+- **Recent Posts**: [Topics they write about, tone, expertise areas]
+- **Liked/Reshared Content**: [Interests and influences from their engagement]
+- **Comments**: [Perspectives and opinions from their comments]
+- **Recurring Themes**: [Pain points, interests, expertise areas from content]
+- **Communication Style**: [Personality and approach from posts/comments]
+- **Thought Leadership**: [Areas where they share insights and opinions]
+
+#### Additional Research Insights
+- **Web Search Findings**: [Articles, interviews, press mentions found online]
+- **Professional Content**: [Blog posts, articles, speaking engagements, podcasts]
+- **Social Media Activity**: [Twitter/X, Medium, other platforms activity]
+- **Company Intelligence**: [Company culture, tools, policies, recent changes]
+- **Industry Context**: [Industry trends, challenges, competitive landscape]
+
+### Interview Strategy
+
+#### Conversation Starters
+- **Mutual Connections**: Reference [Specific mutual connections]
+- **Shared Experience**: [Shared context or experience]
+- **Product Philosophy**: Connect to [Specific philosophy or approach]
+- **Recent Work**: Ask about [Specific recent work or projects]
+
+### Research Notes
+- **LinkedIn Profile**: [Profile research summary]
+- **Mutual Connections**: [Network overlap details]
+- **Company Context**: [Company and industry context]
+- **Role Relevance**: [Why this customer is a good fit]
+- **Timing**: [Why timing is good for interview]
+
+## Interview Questions (AI Agent creates these based on strategic document - Mom Test Compliant)
+
+### Priority Questions
+[AI Agent creates specific questions based on strategic assumptions and customer context]
+**Mom Test Format**: "Tell me about the last time you..." or "Walk me through what happened when..."
+
+### Validation Questions  
+[AI Agent creates questions to validate specific strategic assumptions from the strategy document]
+**Focus**: Past behavior, specific examples, current processes
+
+### Follow-up Questions
+[AI Agent creates follow-up questions based on customer background and role]
+**Format**: "How did that work out?" or "What would you have done differently?"

package/dist/registry/templates/customer-development/customer-persona-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+# Customer Persona Template
+
+## Basic Information
+- **Persona Name**: [Give your ideal customer a name]
+- **Industry/Sector**: [What industry do they work in?]
+- **Job Title/Role**: [What is their position?]
+- **Company Size**: [Startup, SMB, Enterprise]
+- **Geographic Location**: [Where are they located?]
+
+## Demographics
+- **Age Range**: [Age bracket]
+- **Education Level**: [Educational background]
+- **Income Range**: [If relevant]
+- **Experience Level**: [Years in role/industry]
+
+## Pain Points & Challenges
+1. **Primary Pain Point**: [Main problem your solution addresses]
+2. **Secondary Pain Points**: [Additional problems they face]
+3. **Current Solutions**: [How do they currently handle these problems?]
+4. **Frustrations**: [What frustrates them about current solutions?]
+
+## Behavioral Indicators
+- **Online Behavior**: [Where do they spend time online?]
+- **Content Consumption**: [What do they read/watch?]
+- **Social Media Usage**: [Which platforms do they use?]
+- **Professional Networks**: [LinkedIn groups, associations]
+- **Forums/Communities**: [Where do they seek help/advice?]
+
+## Search Keywords
+### LinkedIn Keywords
+- [Professional terms they use]
+- [Job titles to search for]
+- [Company types]
+- [Skills they mention]
+
+### Reddit Keywords
+- [Subreddits they frequent]
+- [Problems they discuss]
+- [Solutions they seek]
+
+### X (Twitter) Keywords
+- [Hashtags they use]
+- [Complaints they voice]
+- [Topics they discuss]
+
+### Facebook Keywords
+- [Groups they join]
+- [Topics they discuss]
+- [Problems they share]
+
+### Web Search Keywords
+- [Blog topics they read]
+- [Problems they Google]
+- [Solutions they research]
+
+## Qualification Criteria
+- **Must Have**: [Non-negotiable requirements]
+- **Nice to Have**: [Preferred but not required]
+- **Red Flags**: [Disqualifying factors]
+
+## Contact Preferences
+- **Preferred Channels**: [Email, LinkedIn, Twitter DM, etc.]
+- **Best Times**: [When to reach out]
+- **Messaging Tone**: [Professional, casual, technical]
+
+## Success Indicators
+- **Budget Authority**: [Do they have buying power?]
+- **Urgency**: [How urgent is their need?]
+- **Fit Score**: [How well do they match your solution?]