dsh-vibe-math 2.5.0 → 2.6.0

package/prompt-corpus-v2/formal-verify-v2.json

@@ -258,6 +258,12 @@
       "label": "explorer:qStay",
       "prompt": "You are a research mathematician orchestrating strategy for one problem.\n\nPROBLEM (id: qStay): 保持调度器运行的占位问题\n\n\nKNOWLEDGE BASE & DATA MODEL (definition contract you MUST follow):\n\n1) PROBABILITY SEMANTICS — the single most important rule:\n- 正确概率 / 布尔估计 ∈ [0,1]。\n- 1 = 绝对正确（已被证明且验证通过）：你可以把它当作已知事实/可信结论直接用于推理。\n- 0 = 绝对错误（已被证伪且验证通过）。\n- 0 与 1 之间的任何值 = 未定论/待验证：只能作为参考证据，绝不能当作已成立的事实引用。\n- Verified/ 中的卡片概率恒为 1 或 0，内容可信、可直接引用。\n\n2) OBJECT MODELS (按实现方案)：\n- 问题 PROBLEM（qs/qs.json）：{ id, 概述（完整问题陈述，所提到的每个对象/记号都要给出完整定义）, 已解决(bool), 解法列表:[{ 完整解法（详细步骤）, 正确概率, 已验 }], 优先级（整数，越小越优先调度；\"never\"=永不调度）, progress（历史：已试方向、各方向路线、阻碍及原因、教训、可行性评估）}。\n- 命题 PROPOSITION（Propos/<分类>_Propos.json）：{ id, 概述（完整陈述）, 布尔估计（该命题为真的概率）, 细类型（分类 JSON）, 证明列表:[{ 完整过程（完整证明）, 正确概率, 支持信息/依据 }], 证伪列表:[{ 完整过程（完整证伪）, 正确概率, 支持信息/依据 }], 优先级, 价值/关键性（0-1，重要性）, progress（过往尝试与教训）}。\n- 收口规则：问题的某个解法 正确概率=1 → 问题已解决；命题的证明/证伪条目 正确概率=1 → 命题布尔估计=1/0（已定论）。\n\n3) FOLDERS (per project, VibeMath/Projects/<project>/)：\n- qs/qs.json：问题清单——求解与验证的唯一问题来源。\n- Propos/<分类>_Propos.json：命题知识库（已有认知）。\n- Reliable/：可信参考文献（只读）。\n- Verified/<分类>_Verified.json：定论事实索引——布尔估计=0/1 的命题卡片与已解决问题卡片；内容可信、可直接使用。\n- Verification_logs/：辩论记录。Progress_Logs/：进度与报告。VibeMath_State/：调度器私有状态——不要读也不要改。\n\n4) OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS (你输出的每个对象必须满足)：\n- 完整性、不断章取义：任何你写出的问题/命题/结论都要给出完整陈述，并把它所依赖的对象、环境、背景、定义全部补全（例如提到某个序列/函数/定理时给出其完整定义与假设）。\n- 引用溯源：若你引用了 qs/qs.json、Propos/、Verified/、Reliable/ 中已有的命题/引理/结论/解法，必须给出出处——具体文件路径（相对项目根，如 Propos/数论_Propos.json 或 Verified/未分类_Verified.json）+ 对象 id 或 JSON 路径（如 .证明列表[0] 或 .directions[1]）；没有出处的引用一律不允许。你自己新提出的结论则必须自带完整定义，不得引用未定义的内容。\n- 若结论依赖某个临时假设 p，必须显式写成「若 <p 的完整陈述> 成立，则：...」（同样要定义完整）。\n- 只输出规定的 JSON（放在 ```json 代码围栏内），JSON 之外不写任何内容。\n- 示例（完整问题 概述）：\"设 {a_n} 为非负实数序列（n≥1），满足：对任意正整数 n 都存在 i,j 使 |a_i − a_j| = 1/n^p（p>0 为实参数）。判断：p 在什么范围内保证级数 ∑_{n=1}^∞ a_n 发散？\" —— 每个记号（序列、参数、级数）都在句内定义完整，读它的人无需再查背景。\n- 示例（完整命题 概述）：\"设函数 f:[0,1]→R 连续，则 f 在 [0,1] 上有界（连续性按 ε-δ 定义，有界性按标准实数分析定义）。\" —— 概念与对象定义完整，不引用未定义的记号。\n\n\nYOUR PERMISSIONS / CAPABILITIES:\n- Network tools (web search / fetch): available; Script/shell tools (pwsh): available (your actual tool list is enforced by the framework).\n- You may use external tools (web search / literature lookup, symbolic/numeric computation (running scripts)) to assist; no per-round limit by default.\n- You may READ any file under Verified/ as a known, trusted dependency (resolved facts).\n- You should BASE your reasoning on the existing knowledge under Propos/ (propositions with proofs/refutations and probabilities) and Reliable/ (trusted references).\n- You must NOT write files directly: return structured JSON only — the scheduler is the single writer.\n\nHOW TO READ EXISTING KNOWLEDGE (coarse scan → fine read):\n- These are JSON files. A conclusion object carries summary-index fields (概述 / 布尔估计 / 优先级) and the full detail (证明列表 / 证伪列表 / 完整过程 / progress).\n- COARSE SCAN first: use a read/grep tool to extract ONLY the summary index (概述, 布尔估计, 优先级, titles) to locate which files / objects look relevant — do NOT load full proofs yet.\n- FINE READ after: once you identify a valuable object, read that file again and extract its full JSON (完整过程 / 证明 / 证伪 / progress) via the index you found.\n\n【顺手形式化（强制）】把你工作中常用或可能复用的对象、假设、新定义用 Lean 形式化定义并归档到全局可复用库（vibe_math_lean_archive kind='def'），已成立的引理归到 <VIBEMATH>/Formal/Proved/（kind='lemma'）；写之前先 vibe_math_lean_lib 查重，避免重复定义。归档前先跑通（vibe_math_lean_run 或 run=true）；跑不通的定义不要进可复用库。\n形式化回执（本模式）：若你本轮对某个对象做了形式化难度判断，或发现已有 Lean 证明与命题原文不符，请在回执里加上 \"formal\":{\"target\":\"<对象id>\",\"decision\":\"used|blocked|defect\",\"file\":\"Formal/<对象id>.lean\",\"note\":\"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差\"}（decision='blocked'/'defect' 时必须写明 note，否则整条记录被拒绝；decision='defect' 会撤回该证明的「已通过」状态并写入「形式化待办」）。\n\nDo a first-stage METACOGNITIVE BRAINSTORM: decompose constraints, test boundary/extreme cases, map to similar known problems. Then propose 3-6 DIVERSE, mutually distinct solution directions (e.g. analytic method, constructive proof, contradiction, numeric approximation + limit passage, categorical abstraction, ...). Record each direction with its core assumption and an initial feasibility estimate.\n\nfeasibility ∈ [0,1]: your estimate of the probability this direction leads to a full solution. Every direction must be self-contained and unambiguous: title / method / core_assumption written completely, defining every object they mention — no 断章取义, no undefined symbols.\n\nRespond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no prose and no braces { } outside the JSON:\n{\"directions\":[{\"id\":\"d1\",\"title\":\"...\",\"method\":\"...\",\"core_assumption\":\"...\",\"feasibility\":0.5}]}"
     },
+    {
+      "kind": "spawn",
+      "case": "persist",
+      "label": "paper-writer:proj",
+      "prompt": "You are the DEDICATED PAPER WRITER (single-author mode) of a math research run that has just CONVERGED.\nWrite its final paper in 中文（Chinese）, using ONLY the evidence in the MATERIAL section below.\n\nHARD RULES:\n- NEVER invent content: no new proposition, no new computation, no citation that is not in the MATERIAL.\n- Unresolved or refuted items MUST be explicitly labelled (「未定论」/「已被否证」, or \"unresolved\"/\"refuted\" in English); never present them as established.\n- Fixed 9-section skeleton — provide bodies for these EXACT `## ` headings (the framework writes the headings, author/date and the evidence index itself):\n    1. 摘要 — 1 标题、作者、日期、摘要（原问题 + 主要结论）\n    2. 引言与问题背景 — 2 原问题的完整陈述\n    3. 原问题的完整解法 — 3 最终答案 + 完整推理链\n    4. 已检验通过的命题 — 4 逐条列出，含判定为真的估计值与证据来源\n    5. 已解决的子问题与中间成果 — 5\n    6. 创造或发现的有价值之物 — 6 方法、理论、思想、有价值经验、数学理解\n    7. 规律总结 — 7 从上述条目归纳出的可复用规律\n    8. 讨论、局限与展望 — 8\n    9. 附录：证据与文件索引 — 9 Verified/、Logs/、关键卡片路径\n- A section with no evidence must be exactly 「（本节暂无证据支持的内容——不编造。）」 (do not pad it).\n- Markdown subset only: `#`/`##`/`###`, `- ` lists, `**bold**`, `*em*`, `` `code` ``, and inline math as `$...$`. No tables, images, footnotes or raw HTML.\n\nOUTPUT CONTRACT — respond with ONLY one ```json code fence, no prose:\n{\"title\":\"<paper title>\",\"abstract\":\"<original problem + main results>\",\"sections\":[{\"name\":\"<one of the 9 headings>\",\"body\":\"<markdown>\"}, ...]}\n\nMATERIAL (evidence only — do not add anything beyond it):\nPRESET: vibe-math-v2 (single-author)\nPROJECT: proj\n\n[ORIGINAL PROBLEMS] (qs/qs.json)\n- (none)\n\n[PROPOSITIONS] (Propos/*.json)\n- (none)\n\n[UNRESOLVED / REFUTED — 论文里必须显式标注，不得当成已成立的结论]\n- (none — 所有对象均已定论)\n\n[EVIDENCE INDEX] (only files that exist)\n- Formal/Index.md\n- Formal/TODO.md\n- Formal/pPersist.lean\n- Progress_Logs/report.json\n- Verified/Lean/pPersist.lean\n- VibeMath_State/formal.json\n- qs/qs.json"
+    },
     {
       "kind": "spawn",
       "case": "nogate",
@@ -552,6 +558,12 @@
       "label": "verifier:r-pUsedKeep:1",
       "prompt": "You are one reviewer in a DEBATE (\"交流群\") about this object.\n\nTARGET:\nPROPOSITION (id: pUsedKeep): 已有通过证明后再写一次 used 回执\n\nKNOWLEDGE BASE & DATA MODEL (definition contract you MUST follow):\n\n1) PROBABILITY SEMANTICS — the single most important rule:\n- 正确概率 / 布尔估计 ∈ [0,1]。\n- 1 = 绝对正确（已被证明且验证通过）：你可以把它当作已知事实/可信结论直接用于推理。\n- 0 = 绝对错误（已被证伪且验证通过）。\n- 0 与 1 之间的任何值 = 未定论/待验证：只能作为参考证据，绝不能当作已成立的事实引用。\n- Verified/ 中的卡片概率恒为 1 或 0，内容可信、可直接引用。\n\n2) OBJECT MODELS (按实现方案)：\n- 问题 PROBLEM（qs/qs.json）：{ id, 概述（完整问题陈述，所提到的每个对象/记号都要给出完整定义）, 已解决(bool), 解法列表:[{ 完整解法（详细步骤）, 正确概率, 已验 }], 优先级（整数，越小越优先调度；\"never\"=永不调度）, progress（历史：已试方向、各方向路线、阻碍及原因、教训、可行性评估）}。\n- 命题 PROPOSITION（Propos/<分类>_Propos.json）：{ id, 概述（完整陈述）, 布尔估计（该命题为真的概率）, 细类型（分类 JSON）, 证明列表:[{ 完整过程（完整证明）, 正确概率, 支持信息/依据 }], 证伪列表:[{ 完整过程（完整证伪）, 正确概率, 支持信息/依据 }], 优先级, 价值/关键性（0-1，重要性）, progress（过往尝试与教训）}。\n- 收口规则：问题的某个解法 正确概率=1 → 问题已解决；命题的证明/证伪条目 正确概率=1 → 命题布尔估计=1/0（已定论）。\n\n3) FOLDERS (per project, VibeMath/Projects/<project>/)：\n- qs/qs.json：问题清单——求解与验证的唯一问题来源。\n- Propos/<分类>_Propos.json：命题知识库（已有认知）。\n- Reliable/：可信参考文献（只读）。\n- Verified/<分类>_Verified.json：定论事实索引——布尔估计=0/1 的命题卡片与已解决问题卡片；内容可信、可直接使用。\n- Verification_logs/：辩论记录。Progress_Logs/：进度与报告。VibeMath_State/：调度器私有状态——不要读也不要改。\n\n4) OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS (你输出的每个对象必须满足)：\n- 完整性、不断章取义：任何你写出的问题/命题/结论都要给出完整陈述，并把它所依赖的对象、环境、背景、定义全部补全（例如提到某个序列/函数/定理时给出其完整定义与假设）。\n- 引用溯源：若你引用了 qs/qs.json、Propos/、Verified/、Reliable/ 中已有的命题/引理/结论/解法，必须给出出处——具体文件路径（相对项目根，如 Propos/数论_Propos.json 或 Verified/未分类_Verified.json）+ 对象 id 或 JSON 路径（如 .证明列表[0] 或 .directions[1]）；没有出处的引用一律不允许。你自己新提出的结论则必须自带完整定义，不得引用未定义的内容。\n- 若结论依赖某个临时假设 p，必须显式写成「若 <p 的完整陈述> 成立，则：...」（同样要定义完整）。\n- 只输出规定的 JSON（放在 ```json 代码围栏内），JSON 之外不写任何内容。\n- 示例（完整问题 概述）：\"设 {a_n} 为非负实数序列（n≥1），满足：对任意正整数 n 都存在 i,j 使 |a_i − a_j| = 1/n^p（p>0 为实参数）。判断：p 在什么范围内保证级数 ∑_{n=1}^∞ a_n 发散？\" —— 每个记号（序列、参数、级数）都在句内定义完整，读它的人无需再查背景。\n- 示例（完整命题 概述）：\"设函数 f:[0,1]→R 连续，则 f 在 [0,1] 上有界（连续性按 ε-δ 定义，有界性按标准实数分析定义）。\" —— 概念与对象定义完整，不引用未定义的记号。\n\n\nYOUR PERMISSIONS / CAPABILITIES:\n- Network tools (web search / fetch): available; Script/shell tools (pwsh): available (your actual tool list is enforced by the framework).\n- You may use external tools (web search / literature lookup, symbolic/numeric computation (running scripts)) to assist; no per-round limit by default.\n- You may READ any file under Verified/ as a known, trusted dependency (resolved facts).\n- You should BASE your reasoning on the existing knowledge under Propos/ (propositions with proofs/refutations and probabilities) and Reliable/ (trusted references).\n- You must NOT write files directly: return structured JSON only — the scheduler is the single writer.\n\nHOW TO READ EXISTING KNOWLEDGE (coarse scan → fine read):\n- These are JSON files. A conclusion object carries summary-index fields (概述 / 布尔估计 / 优先级) and the full detail (证明列表 / 证伪列表 / 完整过程 / progress).\n- COARSE SCAN first: use a read/grep tool to extract ONLY the summary index (概述, 布尔估计, 优先级, titles) to locate which files / objects look relevant — do NOT load full proofs yet.\n- FINE READ after: once you identify a valuable object, read that file again and extract its full JSON (完整过程 / 证明 / 证伪 / progress) via the index you found.\n\n【Lean 形式化验证（强制模式）】\n  · 该对象已有**通过的 Lean 形式化证明**（Formal/pUsedKeep.lean，最近运行 exit 0）。\n    **你不需要重新检查推导**。你的任务是**忠实性审查**：逐条核对 Lean 代码里的\n    定义 / 对象 / 条件 / 假设 / 结论是否与命题原文**完全一致**。\n  ▸ 一致 → Result = 1。\n  ▸ **发现任何偏差，不要投 0**：偏差只说明**形式化不合格**，不代表命题为假。此时请：\n      ① Result 给一个严格介于 0 与 1 之间的值（记为弃权），并在 Reason 里写清偏差；\n      ② 用回执 formal:{decision:'defect', note:'<具体偏差>'} 记录它。框架会撤回这条证明的\n         「已通过」状态（降级为 attempted、删除归档证明、写入形式化待办），本次裁定**不定论**；\n         修正形式化并重新跑通后再投票。\n  ▸ 只有当你**独立于这份 Lean 代码**也能确定命题为假时，才投 0，并在 Reason 里写清独立理由。\n\nFULL DEBATE HISTORY SO FAR (每轮所有评审轮流发言的记录):\nRound 1:\nReviewer 0: Result=0.5 Reason=这一轮只是又写了一遍草稿\nReviewer 1: Result=1 Reason=review 1\n\nRespond to the others (agree / rebut / add new evidence, referencing earlier rounds if needed). If you changed your Result because of them, state the reason explicitly.\nRespond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no prose:\n{\"Result\":0.5,\"Reason\":\"updated logic chain / counterexample / proof / refutation\",\"changed\":\"brief reason if you changed your Result, else null\",\"formal\":{\"target\":\"r-pUsedKeep\",\"decision\":\"used|blocked|defect\",\"file\":\"Formal/r-pUsedKeep.lean\",\"note\":\"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差\"}}"
     },
+    {
+      "kind": "spawn",
+      "case": "push-report",
+      "label": "paper-writer:proj",
+      "prompt": "You are the DEDICATED PAPER WRITER (single-author mode) of a math research run that has just CONVERGED.\nWrite its final paper in 中文（Chinese）, using ONLY the evidence in the MATERIAL section below.\n\nHARD RULES:\n- NEVER invent content: no new proposition, no new computation, no citation that is not in the MATERIAL.\n- Unresolved or refuted items MUST be explicitly labelled (「未定论」/「已被否证」, or \"unresolved\"/\"refuted\" in English); never present them as established.\n- Fixed 9-section skeleton — provide bodies for these EXACT `## ` headings (the framework writes the headings, author/date and the evidence index itself):\n    1. 摘要 — 1 标题、作者、日期、摘要（原问题 + 主要结论）\n    2. 引言与问题背景 — 2 原问题的完整陈述\n    3. 原问题的完整解法 — 3 最终答案 + 完整推理链\n    4. 已检验通过的命题 — 4 逐条列出，含判定为真的估计值与证据来源\n    5. 已解决的子问题与中间成果 — 5\n    6. 创造或发现的有价值之物 — 6 方法、理论、思想、有价值经验、数学理解\n    7. 规律总结 — 7 从上述条目归纳出的可复用规律\n    8. 讨论、局限与展望 — 8\n    9. 附录：证据与文件索引 — 9 Verified/、Logs/、关键卡片路径\n- A section with no evidence must be exactly 「（本节暂无证据支持的内容——不编造。）」 (do not pad it).\n- Markdown subset only: `#`/`##`/`###`, `- ` lists, `**bold**`, `*em*`, `` `code` ``, and inline math as `$...$`. No tables, images, footnotes or raw HTML.\n\nOUTPUT CONTRACT — respond with ONLY one ```json code fence, no prose:\n{\"title\":\"<paper title>\",\"abstract\":\"<original problem + main results>\",\"sections\":[{\"name\":\"<one of the 9 headings>\",\"body\":\"<markdown>\"}, ...]}\n\nMATERIAL (evidence only — do not add anything beyond it):\nPRESET: vibe-math-v2 (single-author)\nPROJECT: proj\n\n[ORIGINAL PROBLEMS] (qs/qs.json)\n- (none)\n\n[PROPOSITIONS] (Propos/*.json)\n- (none)\n\n[UNRESOLVED / REFUTED — 论文里必须显式标注，不得当成已成立的结论]\n- (none — 所有对象均已定论)\n\n[EVIDENCE INDEX] (only files that exist)\n- Progress_Logs/report.json\n- qs/qs.json"
+    },
     {
       "kind": "push",
       "case": "push-report",

package/prompt-corpus-v2/formal-verify-v2.md

@@ -2796,7 +2796,55 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"directions":[{"id":"d1","title":"...","method":"...","core_assumption":"...","feasibility":0.5}]}
 ```
 
-## [43] spawn · verifier:r-pFree:0 · case=nogate
+## [43] spawn · paper-writer:proj · case=persist
+
+```text
+You are the DEDICATED PAPER WRITER (single-author mode) of a math research run that has just CONVERGED.
+Write its final paper in 中文（Chinese）, using ONLY the evidence in the MATERIAL section below.
+
+HARD RULES:
+- NEVER invent content: no new proposition, no new computation, no citation that is not in the MATERIAL.
+- Unresolved or refuted items MUST be explicitly labelled (「未定论」/「已被否证」, or "unresolved"/"refuted" in English); never present them as established.
+- Fixed 9-section skeleton — provide bodies for these EXACT `## ` headings (the framework writes the headings, author/date and the evidence index itself):
+    1. 摘要 — 1 标题、作者、日期、摘要（原问题 + 主要结论）
+    2. 引言与问题背景 — 2 原问题的完整陈述
+    3. 原问题的完整解法 — 3 最终答案 + 完整推理链
+    4. 已检验通过的命题 — 4 逐条列出，含判定为真的估计值与证据来源
+    5. 已解决的子问题与中间成果 — 5
+    6. 创造或发现的有价值之物 — 6 方法、理论、思想、有价值经验、数学理解
+    7. 规律总结 — 7 从上述条目归纳出的可复用规律
+    8. 讨论、局限与展望 — 8
+    9. 附录：证据与文件索引 — 9 Verified/、Logs/、关键卡片路径
+- A section with no evidence must be exactly 「（本节暂无证据支持的内容——不编造。）」 (do not pad it).
+- Markdown subset only: `#`/`##`/`###`, `- ` lists, `**bold**`, `*em*`, `` `code` ``, and inline math as `$...$`. No tables, images, footnotes or raw HTML.
+
+OUTPUT CONTRACT — respond with ONLY one ```json code fence, no prose:
+{"title":"<paper title>","abstract":"<original problem + main results>","sections":[{"name":"<one of the 9 headings>","body":"<markdown>"}, ...]}
+
+MATERIAL (evidence only — do not add anything beyond it):
+PRESET: vibe-math-v2 (single-author)
+PROJECT: proj
+
+[ORIGINAL PROBLEMS] (qs/qs.json)
+- (none)
+
+[PROPOSITIONS] (Propos/*.json)
+- (none)
+
+[UNRESOLVED / REFUTED — 论文里必须显式标注，不得当成已成立的结论]
+- (none — 所有对象均已定论)
+
+[EVIDENCE INDEX] (only files that exist)
+- Formal/Index.md
+- Formal/TODO.md
+- Formal/pPersist.lean
+- Progress_Logs/report.json
+- Verified/Lean/pPersist.lean
+- VibeMath_State/formal.json
+- qs/qs.json
+```
+
+## [44] spawn · verifier:r-pFree:0 · case=nogate
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -2863,7 +2911,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pFree","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pFree.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [44] spawn · verifier:r-pFree:1 · case=nogate
+## [45] spawn · verifier:r-pFree:1 · case=nogate
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -2930,7 +2978,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pFree","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pFree.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [45] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=nogate
+## [46] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=nogate
 
 ```text
 You are a research mathematician orchestrating strategy for one problem.
@@ -2991,7 +3039,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"directions":[{"id":"d1","title":"...","method":"...","core_assumption":"...","feasibility":0.5}]}
 ```
 
-## [46] spawn · verifier:r-pReply:0 · case=reply
+## [47] spawn · verifier:r-pReply:0 · case=reply
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -3058,7 +3106,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pReply","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pReply.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [47] spawn · verifier:r-pReply:1 · case=reply
+## [48] spawn · verifier:r-pReply:1 · case=reply
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -3125,7 +3173,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pReply","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pReply.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [48] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=reply
+## [49] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=reply
 
 ```text
 You are a research mathematician orchestrating strategy for one problem.
@@ -3186,7 +3234,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"directions":[{"id":"d1","title":"...","method":"...","core_assumption":"...","feasibility":0.5}]}
 ```
 
-## [49] wake · verifier:r-pReply:0 · case=reply
+## [50] wake · verifier:r-pReply:0 · case=reply
 
 ```text
 You are one reviewer in a DEBATE ("交流群") about this object.
@@ -3251,7 +3299,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"updated logic chain / counterexample / proof / refutation","changed":"brief reason if you changed your Result, else null","formal":{"target":"r-pReply","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pReply.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [50] wake · verifier:r-pReply:1 · case=reply
+## [51] wake · verifier:r-pReply:1 · case=reply
 
 ```text
 You are one reviewer in a DEBATE ("交流群") about this object.
@@ -3316,7 +3364,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"updated logic chain / counterexample / proof / refutation","changed":"brief reason if you changed your Result, else null","formal":{"target":"r-pReply","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pReply.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [51] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=defect
+## [52] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=defect
 
 ```text
 You are a research mathematician orchestrating strategy for one problem.
@@ -3377,7 +3425,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"directions":[{"id":"d1","title":"...","method":"...","core_assumption":"...","feasibility":0.5}]}
 ```
 
-## [52] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:0 · case=defect
+## [53] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:0 · case=defect
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -3445,7 +3493,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pDefect","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pDefect.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [53] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:1 · case=defect
+## [54] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:1 · case=defect
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -3513,7 +3561,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pDefect","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pDefect.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [54] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:0 · case=defect
+## [55] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:0 · case=defect
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -3580,7 +3628,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pDefect","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pDefect.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [55] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:1 · case=defect
+## [56] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:1 · case=defect
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -3647,7 +3695,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pDefect","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pDefect.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [56] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:0 · case=defect
+## [57] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:0 · case=defect
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -3714,7 +3762,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pDefect","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pDefect.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [57] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:1 · case=defect
+## [58] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:1 · case=defect
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -3781,7 +3829,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pDefect","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pDefect.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [58] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:0 · case=defect
+## [59] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:0 · case=defect
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -3848,7 +3896,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pDefect","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pDefect.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [59] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:1 · case=defect
+## [60] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect:1 · case=defect
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -3915,7 +3963,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pDefect","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pDefect.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [60] wake · verifier:r-pDefect:0 · case=defect
+## [61] wake · verifier:r-pDefect:0 · case=defect
 
 ```text
 You are one reviewer in a DEBATE ("交流群") about this object.
@@ -3986,7 +4034,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"updated logic chain / counterexample / proof / refutation","changed":"brief reason if you changed your Result, else null","formal":{"target":"r-pDefect","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pDefect.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [61] wake · verifier:r-pDefect:1 · case=defect
+## [62] wake · verifier:r-pDefect:1 · case=defect
 
 ```text
 You are one reviewer in a DEBATE ("交流群") about this object.
@@ -4057,7 +4105,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"updated logic chain / counterexample / proof / refutation","changed":"brief reason if you changed your Result, else null","formal":{"target":"r-pDefect","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pDefect.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [62] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=defect-rid
+## [63] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=defect-rid
 
 ```text
 You are a research mathematician orchestrating strategy for one problem.
@@ -4118,7 +4166,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"directions":[{"id":"d1","title":"...","method":"...","core_assumption":"...","feasibility":0.5}]}
 ```
 
-## [63] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect2:0 · case=defect-rid
+## [64] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect2:0 · case=defect-rid
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -4186,7 +4234,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pDefect2","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pDefect2.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [64] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect2:1 · case=defect-rid
+## [65] spawn · verifier:r-pDefect2:1 · case=defect-rid
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -4254,7 +4302,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pDefect2","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pDefect2.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [65] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=gate-objid
+## [66] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=gate-objid
 
 ```text
 You are a research mathematician orchestrating strategy for one problem.
@@ -4315,7 +4363,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"directions":[{"id":"d1","title":"...","method":"...","core_assumption":"...","feasibility":0.5}]}
 ```
 
-## [66] spawn · verifier:r-pObjId:0 · case=gate-objid
+## [67] spawn · verifier:r-pObjId:0 · case=gate-objid
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -4383,7 +4431,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pObjId","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pObjId.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [67] spawn · verifier:r-pObjId:1 · case=gate-objid
+## [68] spawn · verifier:r-pObjId:1 · case=gate-objid
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -4451,7 +4499,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pObjId","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pObjId.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [68] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=defect-alias
+## [69] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=defect-alias
 
 ```text
 You are a research mathematician orchestrating strategy for one problem.
@@ -4512,7 +4560,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"directions":[{"id":"d1","title":"...","method":"...","core_assumption":"...","feasibility":0.5}]}
 ```
 
-## [69] spawn · verifier:r-pAlias:0 · case=defect-alias
+## [70] spawn · verifier:r-pAlias:0 · case=defect-alias
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -4580,7 +4628,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pAlias","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pAlias.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [70] spawn · verifier:r-pAlias:1 · case=defect-alias
+## [71] spawn · verifier:r-pAlias:1 · case=defect-alias
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -4648,7 +4696,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pAlias","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pAlias.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [71] spawn · verifier:r-pStale:0 · case=defect-nosub
+## [72] spawn · verifier:r-pStale:0 · case=defect-nosub
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -4716,7 +4764,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pStale","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pStale.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [72] spawn · verifier:r-pStale:1 · case=defect-nosub
+## [73] spawn · verifier:r-pStale:1 · case=defect-nosub
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -4784,7 +4832,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pStale","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pStale.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [73] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=defect-nosub
+## [74] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=defect-nosub
 
 ```text
 You are a research mathematician orchestrating strategy for one problem.
@@ -4845,7 +4893,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"directions":[{"id":"d1","title":"...","method":"...","core_assumption":"...","feasibility":0.5}]}
 ```
 
-## [74] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=defect-ambig
+## [75] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=defect-ambig
 
 ```text
 You are a research mathematician orchestrating strategy for one problem.
@@ -4906,7 +4954,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"directions":[{"id":"d1","title":"...","method":"...","core_assumption":"...","feasibility":0.5}]}
 ```
 
-## [75] spawn · verifier:r-pAmb:0 · case=defect-ambig
+## [76] spawn · verifier:r-pAmb:0 · case=defect-ambig
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -4974,7 +5022,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pAmb","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pAmb.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [76] spawn · verifier:r-pAmb:1 · case=defect-ambig
+## [77] spawn · verifier:r-pAmb:1 · case=defect-ambig
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -5042,7 +5090,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pAmb","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pAmb.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [77] spawn · verifier:r-pAmb-s1:0 · case=defect-ambig
+## [78] spawn · verifier:r-pAmb-s1:0 · case=defect-ambig
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -5110,7 +5158,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pAmb-s1","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pAmb-s1.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [78] spawn · verifier:r-pAmb-s1:1 · case=defect-ambig
+## [79] spawn · verifier:r-pAmb-s1:1 · case=defect-ambig
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -5178,7 +5226,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pAmb-s1","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pAmb-s1.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [79] spawn · explorer:qA · case=anchor-poison
+## [80] spawn · explorer:qA · case=anchor-poison
 
 ```text
 You are a research mathematician orchestrating strategy for one problem.
@@ -5239,7 +5287,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"directions":[{"id":"d1","title":"...","method":"...","core_assumption":"...","feasibility":0.5}]}
 ```
 
-## [80] spawn · solver:qA:d1 · case=anchor-poison
+## [81] spawn · solver:qA:d1 · case=anchor-poison
 
 ```text
 You are a dedicated solver agent working ONE solution direction of a math problem (agent_self_iteration).
@@ -5310,7 +5358,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"status":"continue|success|dead-end","solution":"complete solution text, or null","solution_probability":0.85,"lemmas":[{"title":"...","statement":"...","proof":"...","细类型":{"分类名":{}},"布尔估计":0.6,"价值/关键性":0.5,"优先级":1}],"routes":[{"title":"...","progress":"...","feasibility_signal":"...","blocker":"..."}],"lessons":["..."],"survival_probability":0.5,"dead_end_reason":"... or null","sub_questions":[{"q_sub_title":"...","q_sub_statement":"完整问题陈述(含所有对象/定义)","assumption_title":"p_{q-tmp} 标题","assumption_statement":"完整假设陈述(含所有定义)"}]}
 ```
 
-## [81] spawn · verifier:r-qJudge-s0:0 · case=judge-gate
+## [82] spawn · verifier:r-qJudge-s0:0 · case=judge-gate
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -5379,7 +5427,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-qJudge-s0","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-qJudge-s0.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [82] spawn · verifier:r-qJudge-s0:1 · case=judge-gate
+## [83] spawn · verifier:r-qJudge-s0:1 · case=judge-gate
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -5448,7 +5496,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-qJudge-s0","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-qJudge-s0.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [83] spawn · explorer:qJudge · case=judge-gate
+## [84] spawn · explorer:qJudge · case=judge-gate
 
 ```text
 You are a research mathematician orchestrating strategy for one problem.
@@ -5509,7 +5557,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"directions":[{"id":"d1","title":"...","method":"...","core_assumption":"...","feasibility":0.5}]}
 ```
 
-## [84] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=judge-gate
+## [85] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=judge-gate
 
 ```text
 You are a research mathematician orchestrating strategy for one problem.
@@ -5570,7 +5618,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"directions":[{"id":"d1","title":"...","method":"...","core_assumption":"...","feasibility":0.5}]}
 ```
 
-## [85] spawn · verifier:r-pJudgeSrc:0 · case=judge-gate
+## [86] spawn · verifier:r-pJudgeSrc:0 · case=judge-gate
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -5637,7 +5685,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pJudgeSrc","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pJudgeSrc.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [86] spawn · verifier:r-pJudgeSrc:1 · case=judge-gate
+## [87] spawn · verifier:r-pJudgeSrc:1 · case=judge-gate
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -5704,7 +5752,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pJudgeSrc","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pJudgeSrc.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [87] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=used-keep
+## [88] spawn · explorer:qKeep · case=used-keep
 
 ```text
 You are a research mathematician orchestrating strategy for one problem.
@@ -5765,7 +5813,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"directions":[{"id":"d1","title":"...","method":"...","core_assumption":"...","feasibility":0.5}]}
 ```
 
-## [88] spawn · verifier:r-pUsedKeep:0 · case=used-keep
+## [89] spawn · verifier:r-pUsedKeep:0 · case=used-keep
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -5833,7 +5881,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pUsedKeep","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pUsedKeep.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [89] spawn · verifier:r-pUsedKeep:1 · case=used-keep
+## [90] spawn · verifier:r-pUsedKeep:1 · case=used-keep
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -5901,7 +5949,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pUsedKeep","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pUsedKeep.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [90] wake · verifier:r-pUsedKeep:0 · case=used-keep
+## [91] wake · verifier:r-pUsedKeep:0 · case=used-keep
 
 ```text
 You are one reviewer in a DEBATE ("交流群") about this object.
@@ -5973,7 +6021,7 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"updated logic chain / counterexample / proof / refutation","changed":"brief reason if you changed your Result, else null","formal":{"target":"r-pUsedKeep","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pUsedKeep.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [91] wake · verifier:r-pUsedKeep:1 · case=used-keep
+## [92] wake · verifier:r-pUsedKeep:1 · case=used-keep
 
 ```text
 You are one reviewer in a DEBATE ("交流群") about this object.
@@ -6045,13 +6093,56 @@ Respond with ONLY a single JSON object wrapped in a ```json code fence — no pr
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"updated logic chain / counterexample / proof / refutation","changed":"brief reason if you changed your Result, else null","formal":{"target":"r-pUsedKeep","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pUsedKeep.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [92] push · main-agent · case=push-report
+## [93] spawn · paper-writer:proj · case=push-report
+
+```text
+You are the DEDICATED PAPER WRITER (single-author mode) of a math research run that has just CONVERGED.
+Write its final paper in 中文（Chinese）, using ONLY the evidence in the MATERIAL section below.
+
+HARD RULES:
+- NEVER invent content: no new proposition, no new computation, no citation that is not in the MATERIAL.
+- Unresolved or refuted items MUST be explicitly labelled (「未定论」/「已被否证」, or "unresolved"/"refuted" in English); never present them as established.
+- Fixed 9-section skeleton — provide bodies for these EXACT `## ` headings (the framework writes the headings, author/date and the evidence index itself):
+    1. 摘要 — 1 标题、作者、日期、摘要（原问题 + 主要结论）
+    2. 引言与问题背景 — 2 原问题的完整陈述
+    3. 原问题的完整解法 — 3 最终答案 + 完整推理链
+    4. 已检验通过的命题 — 4 逐条列出，含判定为真的估计值与证据来源
+    5. 已解决的子问题与中间成果 — 5
+    6. 创造或发现的有价值之物 — 6 方法、理论、思想、有价值经验、数学理解
+    7. 规律总结 — 7 从上述条目归纳出的可复用规律
+    8. 讨论、局限与展望 — 8
+    9. 附录：证据与文件索引 — 9 Verified/、Logs/、关键卡片路径
+- A section with no evidence must be exactly 「（本节暂无证据支持的内容——不编造。）」 (do not pad it).
+- Markdown subset only: `#`/`##`/`###`, `- ` lists, `**bold**`, `*em*`, `` `code` ``, and inline math as `$...$`. No tables, images, footnotes or raw HTML.
+
+OUTPUT CONTRACT — respond with ONLY one ```json code fence, no prose:
+{"title":"<paper title>","abstract":"<original problem + main results>","sections":[{"name":"<one of the 9 headings>","body":"<markdown>"}, ...]}
+
+MATERIAL (evidence only — do not add anything beyond it):
+PRESET: vibe-math-v2 (single-author)
+PROJECT: proj
+
+[ORIGINAL PROBLEMS] (qs/qs.json)
+- (none)
+
+[PROPOSITIONS] (Propos/*.json)
+- (none)
+
+[UNRESOLVED / REFUTED — 论文里必须显式标注，不得当成已成立的结论]
+- (none — 所有对象均已定论)
+
+[EVIDENCE INDEX] (only files that exist)
+- Progress_Logs/report.json
+- qs/qs.json
+```
+
+## [94] push · main-agent · case=push-report
 
 ```text
 [Vibe Math V2] 进度更新：当前项目 "proj" 运行中=true，问题 0/0 已解决，命题 0/0 已定论，活跃代理轮数=0，待人工决策=0。请调用 vibe_math_report 汇总当前进展及各代理状态，并用人话简要汇报（不打断用户，简短即可）。
 ```
 
-## [93] spawn · verifier:r-pFeed:0 · case=gate-feedback
+## [95] spawn · verifier:r-pFeed:0 · case=gate-feedback
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -6118,7 +6209,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pFeed","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pFeed.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [94] spawn · verifier:r-pFeed:1 · case=gate-feedback
+## [96] spawn · verifier:r-pFeed:1 · case=gate-feedback
 
 ```text
 You are a STRICT peer reviewer verifying one mathematical object. Check it multiple times.
@@ -6185,7 +6276,7 @@ Independently output your initial review. Respond with ONLY a single JSON object
 {"Result":0.5,"Reason":"detailed logic chain, potential counterexample, or supporting evidence","formal":{"target":"r-pFeed","decision":"used|blocked|defect","file":"Formal/r-pFeed.lean","note":"难度判断/阻塞原因/具体偏差"}}
 ```
 
-## [95] feedback · activity-log · case=gate-feedback
+## [97] feedback · activity-log · case=gate-feedback
 
 ```text
 formal-gate: 【形式化】r-pFeed 的裁定被 require 模式搁置：formal-required：尚未取得 Lean 形式化通过，也没有显式阻塞记录（当前状态 none）｜裁定 真（已记入 Formal/TODO.md）