declapract-typescript-ehmpathy 0.49.12 → 0.49.14

package/dist/.test/assets/cicd-app-react-native-expo/declarations/practices/cicd-app-react-native-expo/.declapract.integration.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,904 @@
+import fs from 'fs/promises';
+import { existsSync, readFileSync } from 'node:fs';
+import path from 'node:path';
+
+import { executeApply } from 'declapract';
+import { genTempDir, given, then, useBeforeAll, when } from 'test-fns';
+import yaml from 'yaml';
+
+import { genTempRepoWithDeclarationsOutside } from '../../utils/genTempRepoWithDeclarationsOutside';
+import { getAllPracticesForUsecase } from '../../utils/getAllPracticesForUsecase';
+
+// executeApply is slow (whole-usecase evaluation across ten practices)
+jest.setTimeout(240_000);
+
+/**
+ * .what = the GRACEFUL-MIGRATION acceptance test for the `app-react-native-expo` usecase,
+ *         run against an already-built expo app repo shaped like `app-protools-native`
+ *         (the wish's part-3 "definition of done").
+ * .why  = every other fixture is a bare/greenfield subset. this one models a REAL repo mid-
+ *         migration — npm (`overrides` + `resolutions`, `package-lock.json`, no
+ *         `packageManager`), a customized `tsconfig.json` (an extra `@app-custom` path), a
+ *         `.gitignore` with its own custom ignores, a husky lockfile hook on the npm name,
+ *         and the deprecated `src/logic/` + `src/data/` layers with a cross-import. it proves
+ *         the whole migration slice applies GRACEFULLY: rename (not delete), union (not
+ *         clobber), merge-not-overwrite — a consumer's own work survives.
+ * .note = the WHOLE usecase is evaluated before any file-filter, so the fixture's
+ *         `declapract.use.yml` defines every variable the ten practices reference.
+ */
+describe('app-react-native-expo — graceful migration of an app-protools-shaped repo', () => {
+  given('[case1] a customized npm expo repo on the deprecated src layers', () => {
+    const tempDir = genTempRepoWithDeclarationsOutside({
+      slug: 'expo-migration',
+      clone: './src/.test/assets/expo-migration/repo-app-protools-shaped',
+      declarations: './src/.test/assets/expo-migration/declarations',
+      symlink: [{ at: 'node_modules', to: 'node_modules' }],
+    });
+
+    const read = (rel: string) =>
+      fs.readFile(path.join(tempDir, rel), 'utf-8').catch(() => null);
+
+    // useBeforeAll RETURNS the captured state (no in-place mutation of a shared const)
+    const state = useBeforeAll(async () => {
+      const config = path.join(tempDir, 'declapract.use.yml');
+
+      // capture the before-state of the files the migration mutates
+      const before = {
+        pkg: await read('package.json'),
+        npmrc: await read('.npmrc'),
+        tsconfig: await read('tsconfig.json'),
+        gitignore: await read('.gitignore'),
+        husky: await read('.husky/check.lockfile.sh'),
+        packageLock: await read('package-lock.json'),
+        deployExpo: await read('.github/workflows/.deploy-expo.yml'),
+        domainIndex: await read('src/domain/objects/index.ts'),
+        logicFile: await read('src/logic/customer/getCustomer.ts'),
+        daoFile: await read('src/data/dao/daoCustomer.ts'),
+        // the stale JS jest config (jsdom) the app-protools-native audit names — a
+        // dual-source hazard the migration must reconcile against the shipped .ts config
+        jestConfigJs: await read('jest.config.js'),
+        jestConfigTs: await read('jest.config.ts'),
+      };
+
+      // apply the whole usecase twice — the migration is a two-pass settle:
+      // pass 1 RELOCATES the deprecated-dir files (imports untouched); pass 2
+      // rewrites those moved files' imports at their new path AND settles the
+      // package.json minVersion pins. (move + import-rewrite are held to
+      // separate passes so declapract never applies a relocate and an in-place
+      // rewrite to one file in one apply.)
+      await executeApply({ config });
+      await executeApply({ config });
+      const after2 = {
+        pkg: await read('package.json'),
+        npmrc: await read('.npmrc'),
+        tsconfig: await read('tsconfig.json'),
+        gitignore: await read('.gitignore'),
+        husky: await read('.husky/check.lockfile.sh'),
+        packageLock: await read('package-lock.json'),
+        deployExpo: await read('.github/workflows/.deploy-expo.yml'),
+        domainIndex: await read('src/domain/objects/index.ts'),
+        // the dir-move destinations
+        movedLogic: await read('src/domain.operations/customer/getCustomer.ts'),
+        movedDao: await read('src/access/daos/daoCustomer.ts'),
+        movedShared: await read('src/domain.operations/shared/formatCustomer.ts'),
+        // the deprecated originals must be GONE
+        oldLogic: await read('src/logic/customer/getCustomer.ts'),
+        oldDao: await read('src/data/dao/daoCustomer.ts'),
+        oldShared: await read('src/logic/shared/formatCustomer.ts'),
+        // the stale JS jest config must be GONE; the shipped .ts config must be PRESENT
+        jestConfigJs: await read('jest.config.js'),
+        jestConfigTs: await read('jest.config.ts'),
+      };
+
+      // a third apply proves the settled state is a fixed point (no drift)
+      await executeApply({ config });
+      const after3 = {
+        pkg: await read('package.json'),
+        tsconfig: await read('tsconfig.json'),
+        movedLogic: await read('src/domain.operations/customer/getCustomer.ts'),
+      };
+
+      return { before, after2, after3 };
+    }, 230_000);
+
+    when('[t0] the deprecated src layers are migrated', () => {
+      then('src/logic/ moves to src/domain.operations/, the original gone', () => {
+        expect(state.after2.movedLogic).toBeDefined();
+        expect(state.after2.movedLogic).not.toBeNull();
+        expect(state.after2.oldLogic).toBeNull();
+      });
+
+      then('src/data/dao/ moves to src/access/daos/, the original gone', () => {
+        expect(state.after2.movedDao).not.toBeNull();
+        expect(state.after2.oldDao).toBeNull();
+      });
+
+      then('the moved logic file has its import path rewritten', () => {
+        // ../../data/dao/daoCustomer -> ../../access/daos/daoCustomer
+        expect(state.after2.movedLogic).toContain('/access/daos/daoCustomer');
+        expect(state.after2.movedLogic).not.toContain('/data/dao/daoCustomer');
+      });
+
+      then('every import SHAPE in the moved file is rewritten (r10 blocker 3)', () => {
+        // the fixture file carries THREE deprecated-layer import shapes; the pipeline
+        // must rewrite ALL of them, not just the first. prove each shape landed at
+        // access/daos with no data/dao path left behind.
+        const moved = state.after2.movedLogic!;
+        // plain value import
+        expect(moved).toContain(
+          "import { daoCustomer } from '@src/access/daos/daoCustomer'",
+        );
+        // type-only import
+        expect(moved).toContain(
+          "import type { Customer } from '@src/access/daos/daoCustomer'",
+        );
+        // barrel re-export
+        expect(moved).toContain(
+          "export { daoCustomer as daoCustomerReExport } from '@src/access/daos/daoCustomer'",
+        );
+        // NO deprecated import PATH survives on any of the three (the quoted specifier
+        // only — the file's own comment still names data/dao as prose, which is fine)
+        expect(moved).not.toContain("'@src/data/dao/daoCustomer'");
+      });
+
+      then('the moved file\'s ../ relative import is aliased (relative-imports two-pass defer)', () => {
+        // the fixture's getCustomer.ts carries a `../shared/formatCustomer` RELATIVE import to
+        // a peer in the same deprecated layer. relative-imports must DEFER it on pass 1 (the
+        // file still sits under logic/, so its isDeferredToDeprecatedDirMove guard fires) while
+        // old-logic-dir relocates the file, then fire on pass 2 once the file sits at
+        // domain.operations/ — the ../shared/formatCustomer path becomes the @src alias. this
+        // proves the branch-new deferred-dir guard end-to-end (the r1 relative-imports blocker):
+        // a relocate and an in-place rewrite of one file never collide in a single pass.
+        // the peer util is itself relocated logic/shared/ -> domain.operations/shared/.
+        expect(state.after2.movedShared).not.toBeNull();
+        expect(state.after2.oldShared).toBeNull();
+        // the importer's relative path is aliased to @src at the file's NEW home
+        expect(state.after2.movedLogic).toContain(
+          "import { formatCustomer } from '@src/domain.operations/shared/formatCustomer'",
+        );
+        expect(state.after2.movedLogic).not.toContain("'../shared/formatCustomer'");
+      });
+    });
+
+    when('[t1] package.json is migrated npm -> pnpm', () => {
+      then('overrides + resolutions relocate into pnpm.overrides', () => {
+        const pkg = JSON.parse(state.after2.pkg!);
+        expect(pkg.overrides).toBeUndefined();
+        expect(pkg.resolutions).toBeUndefined();
+        // the relocated type-fns override (1.9.9) undercuts the declared type-fns, so
+        // pnpm/override-undercuts-dependency raises it to the declared version (#624)
+        expect(pkg.pnpm.overrides['type-fns']).toEqual(
+          pkg.dependencies?.['type-fns'] ?? pkg.devDependencies?.['type-fns'],
+        );
+        expect(pkg.pnpm.overrides['type-fns']).not.toEqual('1.9.9');
+        expect(pkg.pnpm.overrides['@commitlint/format']).toEqual('19.9.9');
+      });
+
+      then('the packageManager pin converges to the blessed exact version', () => {
+        // the fixture is OFF the blessed pin (pnpm@10.32.1). the pnpm
+        // best-practice CONTAINS declares the ONE blessed version (pnpm@10.34.5),
+        // so a consumer off it is converged onto the blessed pin on fix — in
+        // either direction. that convergence-to-one-version is the wisher-settled
+        // org-convergence REQUIREMENT (one blessed pnpm across CI, local, every
+        // repo), not a regression. this characterizes it.
+        const pkgBefore = JSON.parse(state.before.pkg!);
+        expect(pkgBefore.packageManager).toEqual('pnpm@10.32.1');
+
+        const pkg = JSON.parse(state.after2.pkg!);
+        expect(pkg.packageManager).toEqual('pnpm@10.34.5');
+      });
+
+      then('the inline jest dual-source block is dropped', () => {
+        // the repo carried a jest-expo preset INLINE in package.json AND the
+        // tests-expo jest.*.config.ts files — a dual source. the migration drops
+        // the inline block so the config files are the one home.
+        const pkgBefore = JSON.parse(state.before.pkg!);
+        expect(pkgBefore.jest).toBeDefined();
+
+        const pkg = JSON.parse(state.after2.pkg!);
+        expect(pkg.jest).toBeUndefined();
+      });
+    });
+
+    when('[t2] the .npmrc hoist is unioned in, not clobbered', () => {
+      then('the hoisted-linker block is present', () => {
+        expect(state.after2.npmrc).toContain('node-linker=hoisted');
+        expect(state.after2.npmrc).toContain('public-hoist-pattern[]=*expo*');
+      });
+
+      then('the base save-exact line survives', () => {
+        expect(state.after2.npmrc).toContain('save-exact=true');
+      });
+    });
+
+    when('[t3] the customized tsconfig is preserved (CONTAINS, not clobbered)', () => {
+      then('the extends of expo/tsconfig.base holds', () => {
+        expect(state.after2.tsconfig).toContain('expo/tsconfig.base');
+      });
+
+      then("the app's own custom @app-custom path is preserved", () => {
+        expect(state.after2.tsconfig).toContain('@app-custom');
+      });
+    });
+
+    when('[t4] the .gitignore gains the rhachet line, keeps the repo customs', () => {
+      then('the rhachet .agent/.cache/ line is added', () => {
+        expect(state.after2.gitignore).toContain('.agent/.cache/');
+      });
+
+      then("the repo's own custom ignores survive", () => {
+        expect(state.after2.gitignore).toContain('.idea');
+        expect(state.after2.gitignore).toContain('*.pyc');
+      });
+
+      then('the node_modules negations sit below node_modules', () => {
+        const lines = state.after2.gitignore!.split('\n');
+        expect(lines.indexOf('node_modules')).toBeLessThan(
+          lines.indexOf('!.test*/**/node_modules'),
+        );
+      });
+    });
+
+    when('[t5] the husky lockfile hook is swapped to pnpm', () => {
+      then('it watches pnpm-lock.yaml, not package-lock.json', () => {
+        expect(state.after2.husky).toContain('pnpm-lock.yaml');
+        expect(state.after2.husky).not.toContain('package-lock.json');
+      });
+    });
+
+    when('[t5b] the npm lockfile is removed forget-not-destroy', () => {
+      then('package-lock.json is deleted — but only because pnpm-lock.yaml exists', () => {
+        // the fixture seeds BOTH lockfiles (the realistic post-`pnpm install` state),
+        // so the gated fix removes the redundant npm lockfile. the survive-when-unsafe
+        // path (no pnpm-lock.yaml → no delete) is clamped in the bad-practice's own
+        // package-lock.json.declapract.integration.test.ts [case2].
+        expect(state.before.packageLock).not.toBeNull();
+        expect(state.after2.packageLock).toBeNull();
+      });
+    });
+
+    when('[t5c] the expo deploy workflow is migrated npm -> pnpm', () => {
+      then('the npm-shaped install is clobbered to the pnpm shape', () => {
+        // the fixture ships an npm-shaped .deploy-expo.yml (npm ci + actions/cache
+        // on package-lock.json). the cicd-app-react-native-expo practice declares
+        // this workflow via the repo's default EQUALS, so a divergent consumer
+        // file is overwritten with the pnpm template. this is the wish's
+        // "clobber (safe target)" — a CI workflow is a safe overwrite, unlike a
+        // consumer's own tsconfig/gitignore which merge.
+        //
+        // the pnpm template mirrors the node deploy path (.deploy-sls.yml): a shared
+        // install job builds node_modules once via ./.github/workflows/.install.yml,
+        // then each deploy job restores it (fail-on-cache-miss) rather than re-install.
+        // so the pnpm install itself lives in .install.yml, not this workflow.
+        expect(state.before.deployExpo).toContain('npm ci');
+        expect(state.after2.deployExpo).toContain(
+          'uses: ./.github/workflows/.install.yml',
+        );
+        expect(state.after2.deployExpo).toContain('fail-on-cache-miss: true');
+        expect(state.after2.deployExpo).not.toContain('npm ci');
+      });
+
+      then('the before + after .deploy-expo.yml match snapshot', () => {
+        // a diff-visible clamp on the 125-line live CI/CD workflow: any silent
+        // content drift in the template surfaces in the after-snapshot review.
+        expect(state.before.deployExpo).toMatchSnapshot('.deploy-expo.yml — before');
+        expect(state.after2.deployExpo).toMatchSnapshot('.deploy-expo.yml — after migration');
+      });
+    });
+
+    when('[t5e] the jest dual-source is reconciled (stale .js dropped for the .ts config)', () => {
+      // the app-protools-native audit names the jest dual-source hazard: a jsdom
+      // `jest.config.js` + the shipped `jest.config.ts` both present at once. the tests-any
+      // `javascript-config-files` bad-practice DELETES the stale `.js` while the tests-expo
+      // best-practice supplies the canonical `.ts` in the same pass — so a repo under
+      // migration ends with ONE jest config source, not two.
+      then('the fixture starts with a stale JS jest config', () => {
+        expect(state.before.jestConfigJs).not.toBeNull();
+        expect(state.before.jestConfigJs).toContain('jsdom');
+      });
+
+      then('declapract fix removes the stale JS jest config', () => {
+        expect(state.after2.jestConfigJs).toBeNull();
+      });
+
+      then('the shipped .ts jest config lands as the single source', () => {
+        expect(state.after2.jestConfigTs).not.toBeNull();
+      });
+    });
+
+    when('[t5d] the domain EXISTS check is unmet (no src/domain/objects/index.ts)', () => {
+      // the wisher ruled `domain`'s EXISTS check a HARD BLOCKER for every expo repo, and a
+      // real app-protools-shaped repo has no `src/domain/objects/index.ts` on day one. this
+      // characterizes what `declapract fix` DOES on that unmet, content-less EXISTS check:
+      // it flags the absence (the human must author their domain) but auto-creates no file —
+      // there is no sibling template to write — and it does NOT halt the rest of the apply.
+      then('the repo has no domain objects file to begin with', () => {
+        expect(state.before.domainIndex).toBeNull();
+      });
+
+      then('declapract fix does NOT auto-create the file (no template to write)', () => {
+        // an EXISTS best-practice with no sibling content cannot be auto-fixed — the file
+        // stays absent, so the check keeps flagging until the human authors their domain.
+        expect(state.after2.domainIndex).toBeNull();
+      });
+
+      then('the unmet EXISTS does NOT halt the apply — the whole migration still lands', () => {
+        // proof the apply did not abort on the unmet check: the domain practice's OWN
+        // package.json CONTAINS still merged its deps, AND every other practice's mutation
+        // (the dir-move, the pnpm switch, the .npmrc hoist) landed — asserted across [t0]-[t5c].
+        const pkg = JSON.parse(state.after2.pkg!);
+        expect(pkg.dependencies['domain-objects']).toBeDefined();
+        expect(pkg.dependencies['type-fns']).toBeDefined();
+        expect(state.after2.movedLogic).not.toBeNull();
+      });
+    });
+
+    when('[t6] the migration is re-applied', () => {
+      then('package.json is a fixed point once settled', () => {
+        expect(state.after3.pkg).toEqual(state.after2.pkg);
+      });
+
+      then('tsconfig.json is a fixed point', () => {
+        expect(state.after3.tsconfig).toEqual(state.after2.tsconfig);
+      });
+
+      then('the moved logic file is a fixed point', () => {
+        expect(state.after3.movedLogic).toEqual(state.after2.movedLogic);
+      });
+
+      then('the before + settled package.json match snapshot', () => {
+        expect(state.before.pkg).toMatchSnapshot('package.json — before');
+        expect(state.after2.pkg).toMatchSnapshot('package.json — after migration');
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+/**
+ * .what = a drift guard between the migration fixture's curated practice subset and the
+ *         real `app-react-native-expo` usecase in `src/useCases.yml`.
+ * .why  = the fixture above deliberately exercises only the practices that MUTATE an extant
+ *         repo's files (the migration-risk set). the rest of the real usecase merely DROPS a
+ *         net-new file (a config-only practice: lint, format, husky, …) and carries no
+ *         migration risk, so it is left out on purpose. that curation is a hidden link:
+ *         when a practice is added to the real usecase, the fixture silently falls out of
+ *         date and no test notices. this guard makes the link explicit — every real
+ *         practice must be classified as EITHER exercised-by-the-fixture OR config-only-
+ *         allowlisted, so a new practice fails the build until a human triages it into one bin.
+ */
+describe('app-react-native-expo — migration-fixture drift guard', () => {
+  // a config-only practice DROPS a net-new file with no migration risk, so the migration
+  // fixture need not exercise it. each entry is a deliberate human triage, not a default.
+  // NO terraform-common — it was dropped from the expo usecase (an expo app owns no
+  // terraform-managed infra), so it is no longer a practice to classify.
+  const configOnlyAllowlist = [
+    'cache',
+    'cicd-common',
+    'conventional-commits',
+    'errors',
+    'husky',
+    'format',
+    'nonpublished-modules',
+    'package-json-order',
+    'provision-github',
+    'lint',
+    'lint-react',
+    'lint-react-native',
+  ];
+
+  const readUsecasePractices = (input: {
+    path: string;
+    usecase: string;
+  }): string[] => {
+    const parsed = yaml.parse(readFileSync(input.path, 'utf-8'));
+    return parsed['use-cases'][input.usecase].practices;
+  };
+
+  // the practices in `of` absent from `reference` — the set-difference the drift asserts on.
+  const getPracticesAbsentFrom = (input: {
+    of: string[];
+    reference: string[];
+  }): string[] =>
+    input.of.filter((practice) => !input.reference.includes(practice));
+
+  // the practices in `of` also present in `reference` — the set-overlap the drift forbids.
+  const getPracticesPresentIn = (input: {
+    of: string[];
+    reference: string[];
+  }): string[] =>
+    input.of.filter((practice) => input.reference.includes(practice));
+
+  const repoRoot = path.join(__dirname, '../../..');
+
+  given('the real usecase and the fixture usecase', () => {
+    // the real expo usecase now COMPOSES its platform baseline via `extends`, so its full
+    // expanded set (not its raw `.practices`, which holds only the expo delta) is the true
+    // practice set a consumer receives. expand it so the fixture-vs-real comparison stays honest.
+    const realPractices = getAllPracticesForUsecase({
+      usecasesYmlPath: path.join(repoRoot, 'src/useCases.yml'),
+      usecase: 'app-react-native-expo',
+    });
+    // the fixture usecase lists its practices inline (no extends), so its raw list is its set.
+    const fixturePractices = readUsecasePractices({
+      path: path.join(
+        repoRoot,
+        'src/.test/assets/expo-migration/declarations/useCases.yml',
+      ),
+      usecase: 'app-react-native-expo',
+    });
+
+    when('the fixture subset is measured against the real usecase', () => {
+      then('the fixture invents no practice absent from the real usecase', () => {
+        const invented = getPracticesAbsentFrom({
+          of: fixturePractices,
+          reference: realPractices,
+        });
+        expect(invented).toEqual([]);
+      });
+
+      then('a fixture practice is never also on the config-only allowlist', () => {
+        const overlap = getPracticesPresentIn({
+          of: fixturePractices,
+          reference: configOnlyAllowlist,
+        });
+        expect(overlap).toEqual([]);
+      });
+
+      then('the allowlist names no practice absent from the real usecase', () => {
+        const dead = getPracticesAbsentFrom({
+          of: configOnlyAllowlist,
+          reference: realPractices,
+        });
+        expect(dead).toEqual([]);
+      });
+
+      then('every real usecase practice is classified — exercised or config-only', () => {
+        const unclassified = getPracticesAbsentFrom({
+          of: realPractices,
+          reference: [...fixturePractices, ...configOnlyAllowlist],
+        });
+        expect(unclassified).toEqual([]);
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+/**
+ * .what = a drift guard between `typescript-project`'s platform baseline and the
+ *         `app-react-native-expo` usecase in `src/useCases.yml`.
+ * .why  = both usecases now COMPOSE the shared `typescript-project-core` baseline via
+ *         `extends`, so the 17 runtime-agnostic practices reach both consumers from ONE
+ *         source and cannot drift apart by hand-copy. this guard is the second line of
+ *         defense: it measures each usecase's RESOLVED practice set (extends applied) and
+ *         asserts every practice in `typescript-project`'s resolved set is EITHER in expo's
+ *         resolved set OR on the `expoDivergesFromBaseline` allowlist (a deliberate
+ *         runtime-swap or exclusion). so if a future practice is added to `typescript-project`
+ *         DIRECTLY (its runtime delta, not the shared core), it fails the build until a human
+ *         triages it into expo or names it a divergence — the silent-drift regression this
+ *         whole wish exists to fix, kept loud.
+ * .note = the guard reads the RESOLVED set (`getAllPracticesForUsecase`), not the raw
+ *         `.practices`. after the core extraction both usecases carry only their runtime
+ *         delta inline, so a raw read would compare deltas, not baselines.
+ */
+describe('app-react-native-expo — platform-baseline drift guard', () => {
+  // the practices `typescript-project`'s resolved set carries that the expo usecase
+  // deliberately does NOT — each a runtime swap or a wish-scoped exclusion, not an oversight.
+  // a build failure here means: triage the new baseline practice into expo, or add it here
+  // with a reason.
+  const expoDivergesFromBaseline = [
+    // node-shaped build/test practices, replaced by the -expo cut in the triad
+    'typescript-node', // → typescript-expo
+    'tests-node', //      → tests-expo
+    // a runtime rate-limit lib, excluded by the wish (not a platform tool)
+    'bottleneck',
+  ];
+
+  const usecasesYmlPath = path.join(__dirname, '../../..', 'src/useCases.yml');
+
+  given('the typescript-project baseline and the expo usecase', () => {
+    const baselinePractices = getAllPracticesForUsecase({
+      usecasesYmlPath,
+      usecase: 'typescript-project',
+    });
+    const expoPractices = getAllPracticesForUsecase({
+      usecasesYmlPath,
+      usecase: 'app-react-native-expo',
+    });
+
+    when('the expo usecase is measured against the baseline', () => {
+      then('every baseline practice is in expo OR deliberately diverged', () => {
+        // this assertion carries the load: a practice added to typescript-project
+        // that is neither carried into expo nor listed as a deliberate divergence
+        // fails the build — so the silent-drift regression cannot ship.
+        const classified = new Set([
+          ...expoPractices,
+          ...expoDivergesFromBaseline,
+        ]);
+        const undropped = baselinePractices.filter(
+          (practice) => !classified.has(practice),
+        );
+        expect(undropped).toEqual([]);
+      });
+
+      then('the divergence allowlist names no practice absent from the baseline', () => {
+        const dead = expoDivergesFromBaseline.filter(
+          (practice) => !baselinePractices.includes(practice),
+        );
+        expect(dead).toEqual([]);
+      });
+
+      then('a diverged practice is never ALSO present in the expo usecase', () => {
+        // a practice cannot be both "carried into expo" and "deliberately dropped"
+        const contradiction = expoDivergesFromBaseline.filter((practice) =>
+          expoPractices.includes(practice),
+        );
+        expect(contradiction).toEqual([]);
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+/**
+ * .what = a characterization test that PINS every usecase's fully-resolved practice set
+ *         (extends applied) to an explicit expected list.
+ * .why  = the `typescript-project-core` extraction moved 17 shared practices out of the
+ *         hand-copied usecase bodies into one composed baseline. the extraction is only safe
+ *         if it changes ZERO practice for any consumer. this test is that proof: it locks each
+ *         usecase's resolved set, so any future edit to the extends graph or the core that
+ *         would add/drop a practice for a repo fails the build with an exact diff. it also
+ *         documents declapract's NON-TRANSITIVE extends (declapract#17) — each consumer must
+ *         extend `typescript-project-core` DIRECTLY, since it does not arrive through
+ *         `typescript-project`.
+ */
+describe('useCases.yml — resolved-practice characterization', () => {
+  const usecasesYmlPath = path.join(__dirname, '../../..', 'src/useCases.yml');
+
+  const sorted = (input: string[]): string[] => [...input].sort();
+
+  // the shared runtime-agnostic baseline every real dev repo composes
+  const core = [
+    'cache',
+    'cicd-common',
+    'conventional-commits',
+    'husky',
+    'directory-structure-src',
+    'domain',
+    'errors',
+    'format',
+    'git',
+    'lint',
+    'node',
+    'nonpublished-modules',
+    'package-json-order',
+    'rhachet',
+    'tests-any',
+    'typescript-any',
+    'pnpm',
+  ];
+
+  // the node runtime delta atop the core
+  const nodeDelta = ['tests-node', 'typescript-node', 'bottleneck'];
+
+  const lambdaServiceDelta = [
+    'artifact',
+    'cicd-service',
+    'config',
+    'commands',
+    'dates-and-times',
+    'environments',
+    'environments-aws',
+    'logs',
+    'node-service',
+    'runtime-schemas',
+    'serverless',
+    'provision-github',
+    'terraform-common',
+    'terraform-aws',
+    'tests-service',
+    'uuid',
+  ];
+
+  const expected: Record<string, string[]> = {
+    'typescript-project-core': core,
+    'typescript-project': [...core, ...nodeDelta],
+    'npm-package': [
+      ...core,
+      ...nodeDelta,
+      'cicd-package',
+      'node-package',
+      'provision-github',
+    ],
+    'lambda-service': [...core, ...nodeDelta, ...lambdaServiceDelta],
+    'lambda-service-with-rds': [
+      ...core,
+      ...nodeDelta,
+      ...lambdaServiceDelta,
+      'persist-with-rds',
+    ],
+    'lambda-service-with-dynamodb': [
+      ...core,
+      ...nodeDelta,
+      ...lambdaServiceDelta,
+      'persist-with-dynamodb',
+    ],
+    // the expo runtime delta atop the core — NO terraform-common (an expo app owns no
+    // terraform-managed infra; declastruct is the go-forward), NO node-shaped build/test.
+    'app-react-native-expo': [
+      ...core,
+      'cicd-app-react-native-expo',
+      'provision-github',
+      'lint-react',
+      'lint-react-native',
+      'tests-expo',
+      'typescript-expo',
+    ],
+  };
+
+  given('the useCases.yml extends graph', () => {
+    for (const usecase of Object.keys(expected)) {
+      when(`the resolved set of '${usecase}'`, () => {
+        then('matches the pinned characterization', () => {
+          const actual = getAllPracticesForUsecase({ usecasesYmlPath, usecase });
+          expect(sorted(actual)).toEqual(sorted(expected[usecase]!));
+        });
+      });
+    }
+  });
+
+  when('expo is compared to the core baseline', () => {
+    then('expo carries every core practice (the extraction reached it)', () => {
+      const expo = getAllPracticesForUsecase({
+        usecasesYmlPath,
+        usecase: 'app-react-native-expo',
+      });
+      const absent = core.filter((practice) => !expo.includes(practice));
+      expect(absent).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    then('expo carries no terraform-common (dropped in this wish)', () => {
+      const expo = getAllPracticesForUsecase({
+        usecasesYmlPath,
+        usecase: 'app-react-native-expo',
+      });
+      expect(expo).not.toContain('terraform-common');
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+/**
+ * .what = the FULL-usecase evaluation smoke — a real `executeApply` of the COMPLETE
+ *         `app-react-native-expo` usecase (all 23 practices, the same set a consumer
+ *         receives), run against the app-protools-shaped repo.
+ * .why  = the graceful-migration acceptance test above deliberately curates the 11
+ *         migration-RISK practices, so the 12 config-only practices (cicd-common, husky,
+ *         conventional-commits, format, lint, …) — the bulk of the real usecase — are
+ *         never exercised end-to-end. this smoke closes that gap: it proves the WHOLE
+ *         usecase expands and applies without a variable-gap, a cross-practice collision,
+ *         or an ELOOP — the wish's headline criterion (a consumer runs `declapract fix`
+ *         on the real usecase and it lands clean). the fixture symlinks all 23 practices
+ *         individually (never the real `src/practices` dir), so the deep-walk is loop-free
+ *         by construction.
+ * .note = a practice-set parity guard below pins this fixture's usecase === the real
+ *         `src/useCases.yml` usecase, so the smoke can never silently test a stale set.
+ */
+/**
+ * .what = a clamp on the expo `deploy.yml` prod job's `if:` test-gate precedence — the prod
+ *         job must bind the `needs.test` gate to EVERY trigger branch, so a `v*` tag push
+ *         cannot deploy to prod on a FAILED test.
+ * .why  = github-actions `&&` binds tighter than `||`, so an `if:` written
+ *         `(tag) || (access==prod) && always() && (test ok)` parses as `tag || (access &&
+ *         always && test)` — the test gate binds ONLY to the access branch, so a `v*` TAG
+ *         PUSH deploys to prod even when `test` FAILED. the correct shape wraps both trigger
+ *         branches in one OUTER group the gate applies to:
+ *         `((tag) || access==prod) && always() && (test ok)`. this is the silent-break class
+ *         the wish fights — an untested build reaches prod, every gate green. the clamp reads
+ *         the raw prod `if:` and reddens on the un-grouped (bug) shape. it mirrors the
+ *         cicd-service prod-gate clamp so both service and app deploy callers hold the guard.
+ * .note = a filesystem walk → integration suite per rule.forbid.unit.remote-boundaries; no
+ *         credential, no network — the boundary alone classifies it. the clamp lives at the
+ *         practice root, never under best-practice/, so it is a declaration and not a template.
+ */
+/**
+ * .what = whether the prod job's collapsed `if:` wraps BOTH trigger branches in ONE outer group
+ *         that the ` && always()` test-gate binds over — the correct precedence.
+ * .why  = a pure transformer leaf, named so the assertion below reads intent rather than a raw
+ *         precedence regex a reader must simulate. the buggy single-group shape opens one paren
+ *         `(startsWith`; the correct shape opens a second, OUTER paren `((startsWith` that the
+ *         ` && always()` gate closes over, so the gate binds to the tag-push branch too, not the
+ *         access branch alone.
+ */
+const isProdGateGroupedCorrectly = (input: { collapsedIf: string }): boolean =>
+  /\(\(startsWith\(github\.ref, 'refs\/tags\/'\).*\|\| github\.event\.inputs\.access == 'prod'\) &&\s*always\(\)/.test(
+    input.collapsedIf,
+  );
+
+describe('cicd-app-react-native-expo — prod test-gate precedence (silent-break clamp)', () => {
+  const readProdIf = (): string => {
+    const text = readFileSync(
+      `${__dirname}/best-practice/.github/workflows/deploy.yml`,
+      'utf-8',
+    );
+    // yaml.parse already returns `any`; annotate (not cast) to read the untyped workflow doc, as
+    // the peer cicd-service clamp does with its `parsed: any` annotation (no rule.forbid.as-cast cast)
+    const parsed: any = yaml.parse(text);
+    return (parsed.jobs?.prod?.if ?? '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
+  };
+
+  given('[case1] the expo deploy.yml prod job', () => {
+    when('[t0] the prod job gates on the test result across every trigger branch', () => {
+      then('the two trigger branches sit in one outer group the test-gate binds to', () => {
+        const collapsed = readProdIf();
+        // guard the shape: an absent `if` leaves collapsed empty, a clean red not a crash
+        expect(collapsed.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+        // teeth: revert the outer paren and isProdGateGroupedCorrectly reddens.
+        expect(isProdGateGroupedCorrectly({ collapsedIf: collapsed })).toEqual(
+          true,
+        );
+      });
+
+      then('the buggy per-branch group (access alone in parens after `||`) is absent', () => {
+        // teeth: the precedence bug wraps the access branch in its OWN parens after the `||`
+        // (`|| (github.event.inputs.access == 'prod') &&`), which lets the tag branch stand alone.
+        // the correct shape leaves the access branch bare inside the outer group.
+        expect(readProdIf()).not.toContain(
+          "|| (github.event.inputs.access == 'prod') &&",
+        );
+      });
+
+      then('the test-result gate itself is present (guards the above from vacuity)', () => {
+        expect(readProdIf()).toContain(
+          "always() && (needs.test.result == 'success' || needs.test.result == 'skipped')",
+        );
+      });
+    });
+
+    when('[t1] the emitted prod-job gate is snapshotted for review', () => {
+      // the regex + toContain clamps above prove the SHAPE; this snapshots the emitted
+      // `if:` gate itself so a reviewer vibechecks the actual precedence group, and any
+      // drift (a reword, an operand reshuffle, a lost outer paren) shows as a diff. per
+      // rule.require.contract-snapshot-exhaustiveness, and mirrors the peer cicd-service clamp.
+      then('the prod job `if:` gate matches snapshot', () => {
+        expect(readProdIf()).toMatchSnapshot(
+          'deploy.yml prod job if: (test-gate precedence)',
+        );
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+describe('app-react-native-expo — full-usecase evaluation smoke', () => {
+  const repoRoot = path.join(__dirname, '../../..');
+  const sorted = (input: string[]): string[] => [...input].sort();
+
+  given('the full-usecase fixture mirrors the real usecase', () => {
+    const realPractices = getAllPracticesForUsecase({
+      usecasesYmlPath: path.join(repoRoot, 'src/useCases.yml'),
+      usecase: 'app-react-native-expo',
+    });
+    const fixturePractices = getAllPracticesForUsecase({
+      usecasesYmlPath: path.join(
+        repoRoot,
+        'src/.test/assets/expo-fullusecase/declarations/useCases.yml',
+      ),
+      usecase: 'app-react-native-expo',
+    });
+
+    when('the fixture practice set is measured against the real one', () => {
+      then('the two practice sets are identical (no silent drift)', () => {
+        expect(sorted(fixturePractices)).toEqual(sorted(realPractices));
+      });
+
+      then('every fixture practice has a symlink in the declarations dir', () => {
+        const symlinked = fixturePractices.filter((practice) =>
+          existsSync(
+            path.join(
+              repoRoot,
+              'src/.test/assets/expo-fullusecase/declarations/practices',
+              practice,
+            ),
+          ),
+        );
+        expect(sorted(symlinked)).toEqual(sorted(fixturePractices));
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  given('[case1] the app-protools-shaped repo on the full usecase', () => {
+    const tempDir = genTempRepoWithDeclarationsOutside({
+      slug: 'expo-fullusecase',
+      clone: './src/.test/assets/expo-migration/repo-app-protools-shaped',
+      declarations: './src/.test/assets/expo-fullusecase/declarations',
+      symlink: [{ at: 'node_modules', to: 'node_modules' }],
+    });
+
+    const read = (rel: string) =>
+      fs.readFile(path.join(tempDir, rel), 'utf-8').catch(() => null);
+
+    // useBeforeAll runs the REAL executeApply over the WHOLE 23-practice usecase; if the
+    // usecase fails to expand (a variable gap), or a practice fix throws (a collision or
+    // ELOOP), this setup throws and every `then` below goes red. so "applies clean" is
+    // proven by the setup that completes AND by the config-only artifacts below.
+    const state = useBeforeAll(async () => {
+      const config = path.join(tempDir, 'declapract.use.yml');
+
+      // two passes: the dir-migration is a two-pass settle (relocate, then rewrite), and
+      // the whole usecase must survive both — the second pass also proves no config-only
+      // practice re-flags its own just-applied output (a fix that would loop).
+      await executeApply({ config });
+      await executeApply({ config });
+
+      return {
+        // a config-only practice ABSENT from the migration subset — proves the 12 extra
+        // practices actually ran (the fixture repo has no commitlint config before apply)
+        commitlint: await read('commitlint.config.js'),
+        // cicd-common (config-only) drops this net-new workflow
+        declastructWorkflow: await read('.github/workflows/.declastruct.yml'),
+        // the migration-risk practices still land in the full set (a superset apply)
+        movedLogic: await read('src/domain.operations/customer/getCustomer.ts'),
+        npmrc: await read('.npmrc'),
+      };
+    }, 230_000);
+
+    when('[t0] the whole usecase is applied', () => {
+      then('the config-only practices ran (commitlint config created)', () => {
+        expect(state.commitlint).not.toBeNull();
+      });
+
+      then('cicd-common ran (the declastruct workflow was dropped in)', () => {
+        expect(state.declastructWorkflow).not.toBeNull();
+      });
+
+      then('the migration-risk practices still landed (superset apply)', () => {
+        expect(state.movedLogic).not.toBeNull();
+        expect(state.npmrc).toContain('node-linker=hoisted');
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  given('[case2] a bare create-expo-app scaffold with no src/ at all', () => {
+    const tempDir = genTempRepoWithDeclarationsOutside({
+      slug: 'expo-fullusecase-greenfield',
+      clone: './src/.test/assets/expo-fullusecase/repo-greenfield',
+      declarations: './src/.test/assets/expo-fullusecase/declarations',
+      symlink: [{ at: 'node_modules', to: 'node_modules' }],
+    });
+
+    const read = (rel: string) =>
+      fs.readFile(path.join(tempDir, rel), 'utf-8').catch(() => null);
+
+    // the greenfield repo holds only package.json + app.json — NO src/ at all. the domain
+    // and directory-structure-src EXISTS checks are therefore unmet, so the apply must FLAG
+    // them (leave the file absent) WITHOUT a halt or a crash. this useBeforeAll proves the
+    // whole 23-practice usecase survives a repo with no src/ tree — the r10 blocker-2 case.
+    const state = useBeforeAll(async () => {
+      const config = path.join(tempDir, 'declapract.use.yml');
+      await executeApply({ config });
+      await executeApply({ config });
+
+      return {
+        // config-only practices still drop their net-new files on a bare tree
+        commitlint: await read('commitlint.config.js'),
+        declastructWorkflow: await read('.github/workflows/.declastruct.yml'),
+        // the expo .npmrc hoist still lands on a bare tree (findsert onto an absent file)
+        npmrc: await read('.npmrc'),
+        // the unmet domain EXISTS check stays absent — flagged, never auto-authored
+        domainIndex: await read('src/domain/objects/index.ts'),
+      };
+    }, 230_000);
+
+    when('[t0] the whole usecase is applied to a bare no-src repo', () => {
+      then('the apply does NOT crash — config-only files still created', () => {
+        expect(state.commitlint).not.toBeNull();
+        expect(state.declastructWorkflow).not.toBeNull();
+      });
+
+      then('the expo .npmrc hoist still lands on a bare tree', () => {
+        expect(state.npmrc).toContain('node-linker=hoisted');
+      });
+
+      then('the unmet domain EXISTS check stays absent (flagged, not auto-authored)', () => {
+        expect(state.domainIndex).toBeNull();
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});