create-yss-spec 3.5.2 → 3.5.3

package/template/.cursor/skills/grill-with-docs/SKILL.md

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
----
-name: grill-with-docs
-description: Use when the user explicitly requests a relentless design interview that must preserve resolved glossary terms, ADR-worthy decisions, and factual research evidence.
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-Call the Skill tool with `grilling`, then call it separately with `domain-modeling`. This compatibility entry does not define a second glossary format: it consumes `domain-modeling/CONTEXT-FORMAT.md`, the repository Context Contract validator, and the lifecycle reconciliation contract.
-
-## Output Contract
-
-1. Read `yss-project.yaml` and the root glossary before the first round, then run `scripts/verify-context-contract --root . --json`. Missing or lowercase root files, nested `CONTEXT.md`, `CONTEXT-MAP.md`, unsupported schema, absolute/cross-repository references, and Markdown pseudo-anchors are `blocked` or `migration-required`.
-2. Separate discoverable facts from user decisions; investigate facts instead of asking the user.
-3. Ask the entire current decision frontier, with a recommendation for every question, then wait.
-4. Keep candidate or disputed terms in the Plan decision frontier. Only after confirmation, use `domain-modeling` to record true stable glossary entries in the repository root's single, case-sensitive `CONTEXT.md`; business rows use the five-column format and `<ContextId>/<EnglishIdentifier>` identity. Non-`Global` Context IDs must come from the approved business responsibility areas in the business-boundary asset.
-5. Create an ADR only when the decision is hard to reverse, surprising without context, and a real trade-off.
-6. Persist factual research/validation records in the repository's existing review or research convention.
-7. For `project-instance`, before requesting approval or returning a next work unit, generate and validate `context_reconciliation` with a readable ref, `document_digest`, `referenced_terms_digest`, and `term_refs`. Unresolved candidates, scope conflicts, aliases, or digest drift are `blocked`; reconciliation does not create another gate. For `template-source`, do not add fictional business terms and return a reasoned `not-applicable` after validating the template contract.
-8. Do not modify implementation skills, contracts, or code until the user confirms shared understanding and the intended change scope.
-
-The final grilling round must list confirmed decisions, unresolved assumptions, documents changed, `context_reconciliation` status/ref, and the next authorized action, then return control to `yss-product-lifecycle` (or the active YSS lifecycle orchestrator). It cannot approve an asset or advance a stage itself. A research note is evidence, not an architecture approval or release claim.

package/template/.cursor/skills/grill-with-docs/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-interface:
-  display_name: "Grill with Docs"
-  short_description: "Grill a design and write its docs"
-policy:
-  allow_implicit_invocation: false

package/template/.cursor/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-interface:
-  display_name: "Improve Codebase Architecture"
-  short_description: "Find and grill architecture improvements"
-policy:
-  allow_implicit_invocation: false

package/template/.cursor/skills/prototype/UI.md

@@ -1,112 +0,0 @@
-# UI Prototype
-
-Generate **several radically different UI variations** on a single route, switchable from a floating bottom bar. The user flips between variants in the browser, picks one (or steals bits from each), then throws the rest away.
-
-If the question is about logic/state rather than what something looks like — wrong branch. Use [LOGIC.md](LOGIC.md).
-
-## When this is the right shape
-
-- "What should this page look like?"
-- "I want to see a few options for this dashboard before committing."
-- "Try a different layout for the settings screen."
-- Any time the user would otherwise spend a day picking between three vague mockups in their head.
-
-## Two sub-shapes — strongly prefer sub-shape A
-
-A UI prototype is much easier to judge when it's **butting up against the rest of the app** — real header, real sidebar, real data, real density. A throwaway route on its own is a vacuum: every variant looks fine in isolation. Default to sub-shape A whenever there's a plausible existing page to host the variants. Only reach for sub-shape B if the prototype genuinely has no nearby home.
-
-### Sub-shape A — adjustment to an existing page (preferred)
-
-The route already exists. Variants are rendered **on the same route**, gated by a `?variant=` URL search param. The existing data fetching, params, and auth all stay — only the rendering swaps. This is the default; pick it unless there's a specific reason not to.
-
-If the prototype is for something that doesn't yet have a page but *would naturally live inside one* (a new section of the dashboard, a new card on the settings screen, a new step in an existing flow) — that's still sub-shape A. Mount the variants inside the host page.
-
-### Sub-shape B — a new page (last resort)
-
-Only use this when the thing being prototyped genuinely has no existing page to live inside — e.g. an entirely new top-level surface, or a flow that can't be embedded anywhere sensible.
-
-Create a **throwaway route** following whatever routing convention the project already uses — don't invent a new top-level structure. Name it so it's obviously a prototype (e.g. include the word `prototype` in the path or filename). Same `?variant=` pattern.
-
-Before committing to sub-shape B, sanity-check: is there really no existing page this could be embedded in? An empty route hides design problems that a populated one would expose.
-
-In both sub-shapes the floating bottom bar is identical.
-
-## Process
-
-### 1. State the question and pick N
-
-Default to **3 variants**. More than 5 stops being radically different and starts being noise — cap there.
-
-Write down the plan in one line, in the prototype's location or a top-of-file comment:
-
-> "Three variants of the settings page, switchable via `?variant=`, on the existing `/settings` route."
-
-This works whether the user is here to push back or not.
-
-### 2. Generate radically different variants
-
-Draft each variant. Hold each one to:
-
-- The page's purpose and the data it has access to.
-- The project's component library / styling system (TailwindCSS, shadcn, MUI, plain CSS, whatever).
-- A clear exported component name, e.g. `VariantA`, `VariantB`, `VariantC`.
-
-Variants must be **structurally different** — different layout, different information hierarchy, different primary affordance, not just different colours. Three slightly-tweaked card grids isn't a UI prototype, it's wallpaper. If two drafts come out too similar, redo one with explicit "do not use a card grid" guidance.
-
-### 3. Wire them together
-
-Create a single switcher component on the route:
-
-```tsx
-// pseudo-code — adapt to the project's framework
-const variant = searchParams.get('variant') ?? 'A';
-return (
-  <>
-    {variant === 'A' && <VariantA {...data} />}
-    {variant === 'B' && <VariantB {...data} />}
-    {variant === 'C' && <VariantC {...data} />}
-    <PrototypeSwitcher variants={['A','B','C']} current={variant} />
-  </>
-);
-```
-
-For sub-shape A (existing page): keep all the existing data fetching above the switcher; only the rendered subtree changes per variant.
-
-For sub-shape B (new page): the throwaway route under `/prototype/<name>` mounts the same switcher.
-
-### 4. Build the floating switcher
-
-A small fixed-position bar at the bottom-centre of the screen with three pieces:
-
-- **Left arrow** — cycles to the previous variant (wraps around).
-- **Variant label** — shows the current variant key and, if the variant exports a name, that name too. e.g. `B — Sidebar layout`.
-- **Right arrow** — cycles forward (wraps around).
-
-Behaviour:
-
-- Clicking an arrow updates the URL search param (use the framework's router — `router.replace` on Next, `navigate` on React Router, etc) so the variant is shareable and reload-stable.
-- Keyboard: `←` and `→` arrow keys also cycle. Don't intercept arrow keys when an `<input>`, `<textarea>`, or `[contenteditable]` is focused.
-- Visually distinct from the page (e.g. high-contrast pill, subtle shadow) so it's obviously not part of the design being evaluated.
-- Hidden in production builds — gate on `process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production'` or an equivalent check, so a stray prototype merge can't ship the bar to users.
-
-Put the switcher in a single shared component so both sub-shapes can reuse it. Locate it wherever shared UI lives in the project.
-
-### 5. Hand it over
-
-Surface the URL (and the `?variant=` keys). The user will flip through whenever they get to it. The interesting feedback is usually **"I want the header from B with the sidebar from C"** — that's the actual design they want.
-
-### 6. Capture the answer and clean up
-
-Once a variant has won, capture the answer — which variant and why — then capture the prototype the way the [SKILL](SKILL.md) describes. Fold the winner into the real code and move the rest onto the throwaway branch, not into main:
-
-- **Sub-shape A** — fold the winner into the existing page; drop the losing variants and the switcher from main.
-- **Sub-shape B** — promote the winning variant to a real route; drop the throwaway route and the switcher from main.
-
-The full set of variants is the primary source, so it lands on the throwaway branch, not the bin — variant components and the switcher left in the main branch rot fast and confuse the next reader.
-
-## Anti-patterns
-
-- **Variants that differ only in colour or copy.** That's a tweak, not a prototype. Real variants disagree about structure.
-- **Sharing too much code between variants.** A shared `<Header>` is fine; a shared `<Layout>` defeats the point. Each variant should be free to throw out the layout.
-- **Wiring variants to real mutations.** Read-only prototypes are fine. If a variant needs to mutate, point it at a stub — the question is "what should this look like", not "does the backend work".
-- **Promoting the prototype directly to production.** The variant code was written under prototype constraints (no tests, minimal error handling). Rewrite it properly when you fold it in.

package/template/.cursor/skills/setup-matt-pocock-skills/domain.md

@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
-# Domain Docs
-
-How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
-
-## Before exploring, read these
-
-- **`CONTEXT.md`** — the single case-sensitive glossary at the Git repository root. Its `context_schema_version` must be supported. A missing root file, lowercase or nested replacement, duplicate, or map-based layout is `blocked` / `migration-required`, not an optional omission.
-- **`docs/adr/`** — if it exists, read ADRs that touch the area you're about to work in. This directory is created lazily when the first qualifying decision is accepted.
-
-When the repository exposes `scripts/verify-context-contract`, run it before creating or changing stable domain, product, architecture, implementation, review, release, or retrospective assets.
-
-## File structure
-
-Every YSS Git repository:
-
-```
-/
-├── CONTEXT.md
-├── docs/adr/
-│   ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
-│   └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
-└── src/
-```
-
-Multiple business responsibility areas do not create additional glossary files. Each stable business term records its approved PascalCase `适用业务责任区`, and consumers reference it as `<ContextId>/<EnglishIdentifier>`. Use `Global/<EnglishIdentifier>` only for language that is genuinely shared across responsibility areas.
-
-## Use the glossary's vocabulary
-
-When your output names a domain concept (in an issue title, a refactor proposal, a hypothesis, a test name), use the term and stable reference defined in `CONTEXT.md`. Don't drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids.
-
-If the concept you need isn't in the glossary yet, that's a signal — either you're inventing language the project doesn't use (reconsider) or there's a real gap (note it for `/domain-modeling`).
-
-## Flag ADR conflicts
-
-If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:
-
-> _Contradicts ADR-0007 (event-sourced orders) — but worth reopening because…_

package/template/.cursor/skills/to-questionnaire/SKILL.md

@@ -1,55 +0,0 @@
----
-name: to-questionnaire
-description: Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-Turn something the user can't answer alone into a **questionnaire** — a Markdown document they hand to one person to fill in async, or fill out together over a meeting. The recipient holds knowledge the user lacks; the questionnaire pulls it out of them.
-
-**Grill the send, not the subject.** Interview the user only about the _send_, which they can always answer: who it goes to, and what they need back. The questions in the document then target the **gap** between what the recipient knows and what the user needs.
-
-Reuse the recipient, purpose and constraints already provided. Ask only for missing information that changes the questionnaire; when both are known, draft directly.
-
-1. **Who is it going to?** If missing, ask for the recipient's role, expertise, and relationship to the user. This fixes the questionnaire's tone and how much context it must carry. Done when you know who the recipient is and what they know that the user doesn't.
-
-2. **What do you need back?** If missing, ask for the specific decisions or facts the user can't resolve alone and needs from this person. Done when you have a concrete list of what the user must walk away able to do or decide.
-
-3. **Write the questionnaire.** Draft questions aimed at the gap from steps 1–2, following the Document structure below. Write it to `to-questionnaire-<slug>.md` in the current directory (slug from the topic) and report the path. Done when the file exists and every item the user named in step 2 is covered by a question.
-
-## Document structure
-
-Frame the document as a **discovery questionnaire**: the user lacks context, the recipient holds it. Order questions most-important-first — async means you may only get one pass — and group them under `##` headings by theme once there are more than a handful. Write it using the template below.
-
-<questionnaire-template>
-
-# <Questionnaire title>
-
-**Purpose:** why this questionnaire exists and the decision riding on it.
-
-**From:** <the user> — **To:** <the recipient> — **How your answers will be used:** <where they go>
-
-## Context
-
-One paragraph orienting a recipient who wasn't in the user's head. Enough to answer well, not a page.
-
-## How to answer
-
-Deadline and rough effort. Partial answers and "I don't know" are useful — flag anything you're unsure of rather than skipping it.
-
-## <Theme heading>
-
-One `##` section per theme. Under each, its questions, most-important-first. Every question is one idea — never compound — with an answer stub directly beneath, and a one-line _why this matters_ only where the question could be misread or invite a throwaway answer.
-
-<question-example>
-### What load is the system expected to handle at launch?
-
-_Why this matters: it decides whether we provision for burst traffic now or defer it._
-
->
-</question-example>
-
-## Anything else?
-
-A closing catch-all: anything we didn't ask that we should know?
-
-</questionnaire-template>

package/template/.cursor/skills/to-questionnaire/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-interface:
-  display_name: "To Questionnaire"
-  short_description: "Front-load questions into a doc for someone to answer"
-policy:
-  allow_implicit_invocation: false

package/template/.cursor/skills/wait-what/SKILL.md

@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
----
-name: wait-what
-description: "Stop. That last message did not land: re-pitch it."
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-用用户当前使用的语言，补足刚才说明所缺的背景并重新解释。保持简明、具体，复用仓库根目录唯一 `CONTEXT.md` 的词汇；跨业务责任区按 `<ContextId>/<EnglishIdentifier>` 定位。只改表达，不启动完整生命周期或重建上下文。

package/template/.cursor/skills/wait-what/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-interface:
-  display_name: "Wait What"
-  short_description: "Re-pitch that — simpler, with the context I'm missing"
-policy:
-  allow_implicit_invocation: false

package/template/.pi/skills/grill-with-docs/SKILL.md

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
----
-name: grill-with-docs
-description: Use when the user explicitly requests a relentless design interview that must preserve resolved glossary terms, ADR-worthy decisions, and factual research evidence.
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-Call the Skill tool with `grilling`, then call it separately with `domain-modeling`. This compatibility entry does not define a second glossary format: it consumes `domain-modeling/CONTEXT-FORMAT.md`, the repository Context Contract validator, and the lifecycle reconciliation contract.
-
-## Output Contract
-
-1. Read `yss-project.yaml` and the root glossary before the first round, then run `scripts/verify-context-contract --root . --json`. Missing or lowercase root files, nested `CONTEXT.md`, `CONTEXT-MAP.md`, unsupported schema, absolute/cross-repository references, and Markdown pseudo-anchors are `blocked` or `migration-required`.
-2. Separate discoverable facts from user decisions; investigate facts instead of asking the user.
-3. Ask the entire current decision frontier, with a recommendation for every question, then wait.
-4. Keep candidate or disputed terms in the Plan decision frontier. Only after confirmation, use `domain-modeling` to record true stable glossary entries in the repository root's single, case-sensitive `CONTEXT.md`; business rows use the five-column format and `<ContextId>/<EnglishIdentifier>` identity. Non-`Global` Context IDs must come from the approved business responsibility areas in the business-boundary asset.
-5. Create an ADR only when the decision is hard to reverse, surprising without context, and a real trade-off.
-6. Persist factual research/validation records in the repository's existing review or research convention.
-7. For `project-instance`, before requesting approval or returning a next work unit, generate and validate `context_reconciliation` with a readable ref, `document_digest`, `referenced_terms_digest`, and `term_refs`. Unresolved candidates, scope conflicts, aliases, or digest drift are `blocked`; reconciliation does not create another gate. For `template-source`, do not add fictional business terms and return a reasoned `not-applicable` after validating the template contract.
-8. Do not modify implementation skills, contracts, or code until the user confirms shared understanding and the intended change scope.
-
-The final grilling round must list confirmed decisions, unresolved assumptions, documents changed, `context_reconciliation` status/ref, and the next authorized action, then return control to `yss-product-lifecycle` (or the active YSS lifecycle orchestrator). It cannot approve an asset or advance a stage itself. A research note is evidence, not an architecture approval or release claim.

package/template/.pi/skills/grill-with-docs/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-interface:
-  display_name: "Grill with Docs"
-  short_description: "Grill a design and write its docs"
-policy:
-  allow_implicit_invocation: false

package/template/.pi/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-interface:
-  display_name: "Improve Codebase Architecture"
-  short_description: "Find and grill architecture improvements"
-policy:
-  allow_implicit_invocation: false

package/template/.pi/skills/prototype/UI.md

@@ -1,112 +0,0 @@
-# UI Prototype
-
-Generate **several radically different UI variations** on a single route, switchable from a floating bottom bar. The user flips between variants in the browser, picks one (or steals bits from each), then throws the rest away.
-
-If the question is about logic/state rather than what something looks like — wrong branch. Use [LOGIC.md](LOGIC.md).
-
-## When this is the right shape
-
-- "What should this page look like?"
-- "I want to see a few options for this dashboard before committing."
-- "Try a different layout for the settings screen."
-- Any time the user would otherwise spend a day picking between three vague mockups in their head.
-
-## Two sub-shapes — strongly prefer sub-shape A
-
-A UI prototype is much easier to judge when it's **butting up against the rest of the app** — real header, real sidebar, real data, real density. A throwaway route on its own is a vacuum: every variant looks fine in isolation. Default to sub-shape A whenever there's a plausible existing page to host the variants. Only reach for sub-shape B if the prototype genuinely has no nearby home.
-
-### Sub-shape A — adjustment to an existing page (preferred)
-
-The route already exists. Variants are rendered **on the same route**, gated by a `?variant=` URL search param. The existing data fetching, params, and auth all stay — only the rendering swaps. This is the default; pick it unless there's a specific reason not to.
-
-If the prototype is for something that doesn't yet have a page but *would naturally live inside one* (a new section of the dashboard, a new card on the settings screen, a new step in an existing flow) — that's still sub-shape A. Mount the variants inside the host page.
-
-### Sub-shape B — a new page (last resort)
-
-Only use this when the thing being prototyped genuinely has no existing page to live inside — e.g. an entirely new top-level surface, or a flow that can't be embedded anywhere sensible.
-
-Create a **throwaway route** following whatever routing convention the project already uses — don't invent a new top-level structure. Name it so it's obviously a prototype (e.g. include the word `prototype` in the path or filename). Same `?variant=` pattern.
-
-Before committing to sub-shape B, sanity-check: is there really no existing page this could be embedded in? An empty route hides design problems that a populated one would expose.
-
-In both sub-shapes the floating bottom bar is identical.
-
-## Process
-
-### 1. State the question and pick N
-
-Default to **3 variants**. More than 5 stops being radically different and starts being noise — cap there.
-
-Write down the plan in one line, in the prototype's location or a top-of-file comment:
-
-> "Three variants of the settings page, switchable via `?variant=`, on the existing `/settings` route."
-
-This works whether the user is here to push back or not.
-
-### 2. Generate radically different variants
-
-Draft each variant. Hold each one to:
-
-- The page's purpose and the data it has access to.
-- The project's component library / styling system (TailwindCSS, shadcn, MUI, plain CSS, whatever).
-- A clear exported component name, e.g. `VariantA`, `VariantB`, `VariantC`.
-
-Variants must be **structurally different** — different layout, different information hierarchy, different primary affordance, not just different colours. Three slightly-tweaked card grids isn't a UI prototype, it's wallpaper. If two drafts come out too similar, redo one with explicit "do not use a card grid" guidance.
-
-### 3. Wire them together
-
-Create a single switcher component on the route:
-
-```tsx
-// pseudo-code — adapt to the project's framework
-const variant = searchParams.get('variant') ?? 'A';
-return (
-  <>
-    {variant === 'A' && <VariantA {...data} />}
-    {variant === 'B' && <VariantB {...data} />}
-    {variant === 'C' && <VariantC {...data} />}
-    <PrototypeSwitcher variants={['A','B','C']} current={variant} />
-  </>
-);
-```
-
-For sub-shape A (existing page): keep all the existing data fetching above the switcher; only the rendered subtree changes per variant.
-
-For sub-shape B (new page): the throwaway route under `/prototype/<name>` mounts the same switcher.
-
-### 4. Build the floating switcher
-
-A small fixed-position bar at the bottom-centre of the screen with three pieces:
-
-- **Left arrow** — cycles to the previous variant (wraps around).
-- **Variant label** — shows the current variant key and, if the variant exports a name, that name too. e.g. `B — Sidebar layout`.
-- **Right arrow** — cycles forward (wraps around).
-
-Behaviour:
-
-- Clicking an arrow updates the URL search param (use the framework's router — `router.replace` on Next, `navigate` on React Router, etc) so the variant is shareable and reload-stable.
-- Keyboard: `←` and `→` arrow keys also cycle. Don't intercept arrow keys when an `<input>`, `<textarea>`, or `[contenteditable]` is focused.
-- Visually distinct from the page (e.g. high-contrast pill, subtle shadow) so it's obviously not part of the design being evaluated.
-- Hidden in production builds — gate on `process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production'` or an equivalent check, so a stray prototype merge can't ship the bar to users.
-
-Put the switcher in a single shared component so both sub-shapes can reuse it. Locate it wherever shared UI lives in the project.
-
-### 5. Hand it over
-
-Surface the URL (and the `?variant=` keys). The user will flip through whenever they get to it. The interesting feedback is usually **"I want the header from B with the sidebar from C"** — that's the actual design they want.
-
-### 6. Capture the answer and clean up
-
-Once a variant has won, capture the answer — which variant and why — then capture the prototype the way the [SKILL](SKILL.md) describes. Fold the winner into the real code and move the rest onto the throwaway branch, not into main:
-
-- **Sub-shape A** — fold the winner into the existing page; drop the losing variants and the switcher from main.
-- **Sub-shape B** — promote the winning variant to a real route; drop the throwaway route and the switcher from main.
-
-The full set of variants is the primary source, so it lands on the throwaway branch, not the bin — variant components and the switcher left in the main branch rot fast and confuse the next reader.
-
-## Anti-patterns
-
-- **Variants that differ only in colour or copy.** That's a tweak, not a prototype. Real variants disagree about structure.
-- **Sharing too much code between variants.** A shared `<Header>` is fine; a shared `<Layout>` defeats the point. Each variant should be free to throw out the layout.
-- **Wiring variants to real mutations.** Read-only prototypes are fine. If a variant needs to mutate, point it at a stub — the question is "what should this look like", not "does the backend work".
-- **Promoting the prototype directly to production.** The variant code was written under prototype constraints (no tests, minimal error handling). Rewrite it properly when you fold it in.

package/template/.pi/skills/setup-matt-pocock-skills/domain.md

@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
-# Domain Docs
-
-How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
-
-## Before exploring, read these
-
-- **`CONTEXT.md`** — the single case-sensitive glossary at the Git repository root. Its `context_schema_version` must be supported. A missing root file, lowercase or nested replacement, duplicate, or map-based layout is `blocked` / `migration-required`, not an optional omission.
-- **`docs/adr/`** — if it exists, read ADRs that touch the area you're about to work in. This directory is created lazily when the first qualifying decision is accepted.
-
-When the repository exposes `scripts/verify-context-contract`, run it before creating or changing stable domain, product, architecture, implementation, review, release, or retrospective assets.
-
-## File structure
-
-Every YSS Git repository:
-
-```
-/
-├── CONTEXT.md
-├── docs/adr/
-│   ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
-│   └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
-└── src/
-```
-
-Multiple business responsibility areas do not create additional glossary files. Each stable business term records its approved PascalCase `适用业务责任区`, and consumers reference it as `<ContextId>/<EnglishIdentifier>`. Use `Global/<EnglishIdentifier>` only for language that is genuinely shared across responsibility areas.
-
-## Use the glossary's vocabulary
-
-When your output names a domain concept (in an issue title, a refactor proposal, a hypothesis, a test name), use the term and stable reference defined in `CONTEXT.md`. Don't drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids.
-
-If the concept you need isn't in the glossary yet, that's a signal — either you're inventing language the project doesn't use (reconsider) or there's a real gap (note it for `/domain-modeling`).
-
-## Flag ADR conflicts
-
-If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:
-
-> _Contradicts ADR-0007 (event-sourced orders) — but worth reopening because…_

package/template/.pi/skills/to-questionnaire/SKILL.md

@@ -1,55 +0,0 @@
----
-name: to-questionnaire
-description: Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-Turn something the user can't answer alone into a **questionnaire** — a Markdown document they hand to one person to fill in async, or fill out together over a meeting. The recipient holds knowledge the user lacks; the questionnaire pulls it out of them.
-
-**Grill the send, not the subject.** Interview the user only about the _send_, which they can always answer: who it goes to, and what they need back. The questions in the document then target the **gap** between what the recipient knows and what the user needs.
-
-Reuse the recipient, purpose and constraints already provided. Ask only for missing information that changes the questionnaire; when both are known, draft directly.
-
-1. **Who is it going to?** If missing, ask for the recipient's role, expertise, and relationship to the user. This fixes the questionnaire's tone and how much context it must carry. Done when you know who the recipient is and what they know that the user doesn't.
-
-2. **What do you need back?** If missing, ask for the specific decisions or facts the user can't resolve alone and needs from this person. Done when you have a concrete list of what the user must walk away able to do or decide.
-
-3. **Write the questionnaire.** Draft questions aimed at the gap from steps 1–2, following the Document structure below. Write it to `to-questionnaire-<slug>.md` in the current directory (slug from the topic) and report the path. Done when the file exists and every item the user named in step 2 is covered by a question.
-
-## Document structure
-
-Frame the document as a **discovery questionnaire**: the user lacks context, the recipient holds it. Order questions most-important-first — async means you may only get one pass — and group them under `##` headings by theme once there are more than a handful. Write it using the template below.
-
-<questionnaire-template>
-
-# <Questionnaire title>
-
-**Purpose:** why this questionnaire exists and the decision riding on it.
-
-**From:** <the user> — **To:** <the recipient> — **How your answers will be used:** <where they go>
-
-## Context
-
-One paragraph orienting a recipient who wasn't in the user's head. Enough to answer well, not a page.
-
-## How to answer
-
-Deadline and rough effort. Partial answers and "I don't know" are useful — flag anything you're unsure of rather than skipping it.
-
-## <Theme heading>
-
-One `##` section per theme. Under each, its questions, most-important-first. Every question is one idea — never compound — with an answer stub directly beneath, and a one-line _why this matters_ only where the question could be misread or invite a throwaway answer.
-
-<question-example>
-### What load is the system expected to handle at launch?
-
-_Why this matters: it decides whether we provision for burst traffic now or defer it._
-
->
-</question-example>
-
-## Anything else?
-
-A closing catch-all: anything we didn't ask that we should know?
-
-</questionnaire-template>

package/template/.pi/skills/to-questionnaire/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-interface:
-  display_name: "To Questionnaire"
-  short_description: "Front-load questions into a doc for someone to answer"
-policy:
-  allow_implicit_invocation: false

package/template/.pi/skills/wait-what/SKILL.md

@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
----
-name: wait-what
-description: "Stop. That last message did not land: re-pitch it."
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-用用户当前使用的语言，补足刚才说明所缺的背景并重新解释。保持简明、具体，复用仓库根目录唯一 `CONTEXT.md` 的词汇；跨业务责任区按 `<ContextId>/<EnglishIdentifier>` 定位。只改表达，不启动完整生命周期或重建上下文。

package/template/.pi/skills/wait-what/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-interface:
-  display_name: "Wait What"
-  short_description: "Re-pitch that — simpler, with the context I'm missing"
-policy:
-  allow_implicit_invocation: false

package/template/.template-spec/agents/domain.md

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
-# 业务词汇与决策文档
-
-本文规定 Engineering Skills 在探索仓库、起草 Ticket、设计架构或实施代码前，如何读取和使用业务词汇与决策文档。
-
-## 文档布局
-
-本仓库只维护一份根业务词汇表：
-
-```text
-/
-├── CONTEXT.md
-├── docs/adr/
-└── docs/
-```
-
-## 探索前读取规则
-
-根据任务影响范围读取：
-
-- 根目录唯一的 `CONTEXT.md`：流程术语、业务术语和统一业务词汇；禁止按业务责任区重复创建。
-- `docs/adr/`：与当前任务相关的架构决策。
-
-`CONTEXT.md` 缺失时必须先恢复该合同；`domain-modeling` skill 会在形成稳定术语或关键决策时按需更新业务词汇或 ADR。
-
-## 使用规则
-
-- 在 Spec、Ticket 标题、测试、架构说明和实施总结中使用 `CONTEXT.md` 定义的中文术语。
-- 业务术语必须同时有 PascalCase `英文标识`；代码类型 / 字段与契约 property 使用该词干按 `CONTEXT.md` 文首规则变形。不把具体类全名、表名或接口路径写入词汇表。
-- `CONTEXT.md` 是业务词汇表，不是需求或实现规格；临时计划和未确认猜测不写入。
-- 业务术语身份固定为 `<ContextId>/<EnglishIdentifier>`；`ContextId` 来自已确认的业务责任区，跨责任区共享才使用 `Global`。生命周期资产只保存结构化 snapshot 与双摘要，不使用 Markdown 标题锚点冒充可解析引用。
-- 如果提案与现有 ADR 或已冻结术语冲突，必须在继续执行前明确指出冲突。