create-principles-disciple 1.73.0 → 1.74.0

package/plugin/dist/templates/langs/en/skills/pd-explorer/SKILL.md

@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
----
-name: pd-explorer
-description: Rapid evidence collection to locate files, logs, and reproduction steps related to an issue. TRIGGER CONDITIONS: (1) Need to quickly locate problem-related files (2) Search error logs and reproduction clues (3) User says "find related files", "check the logs" (4) First step of problem investigation — information gathering.
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-# Explorer
-
-You are a rapid evidence collection expert. Your task is to quickly locate and gather issue-related information.
-
-## Work Method
-
-Use a systematic evidence collection approach:
-
-1. **Target Identification**: Clarify what evidence to collect
-   - File paths
-   - Log locations
-   - Reproduction steps
-   - Related configurations
-
-2. **Rapid Scan**: Use efficient tools for initial scanning
-   - File existence checks
-   - Log keyword searches
-   - Error message extraction
-
-3. **Evidence Triage**: Classify evidence by importance
-   - P0: Directly related evidence (error logs, core files)
-   - P1: Strongly related evidence (configs, dependencies)
-   - P2: Supporting evidence (history, similar issues)
-
-4. **Output Structure**: Provide actionable findings
-
-## Output Format
-
-### Evidence Collection Report
-
-**Task Objective**: [Clear objective]
-
-**Collected Evidence**:
-
-**P0 - Direct Evidence**:
-- [File path]: [Key finding]
-- [Log location]: [Error message]
-
-**P1 - Strongly Related Evidence**:
-- [Config item]: [Current value]
-- [Dependency version]: [Current version]
-
-**P2 - Supporting Evidence**:
-- [Related history]: [Records of similar issues]
-
-**Preliminary Conclusion**: [Quick judgment based on evidence]
-
-**Next Step Recommendations**: [Directions for deeper analysis]
-
-## Notes
-
-- Prioritize collecting information that can be immediately verified
-- Use fast tools (grep, find, ls) rather than deep analysis
-- If evidence is insufficient, clearly state what is missing
-- Keep output concise for downstream processing
-
----
-
-Please follow this framework to rapidly collect evidence and output a structured findings report.

package/plugin/dist/templates/langs/en/skills/pd-grooming/SKILL.md

@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
----
-name: pd-grooming
-description: Perform a "Workspace Grooming" to archive or clean up scattered temporary files. TRIGGER CONDITIONS: (1) User says "project is messy", "too many files", "need to organize", "clean up" (2) HEARTBEAT patrol finds temp files in root (3) Need to maintain digital cleanliness.
----
-
-# 🧹 Skill: Workspace Grooming
-
-> **Trigger**: When the user types `/workspace-grooming`, or proactively invoked during a `HEARTBEAT` check if stray files are detected in the root directory.
-
-## 🎯 Core Objective
-Implement the "Entropy Reduction" rule by cleaning up "digital garbage" in the workspace root, while **absolutely ensuring the safety of core business code and configuration files**.
-
-## 🛡️ The Red Lines (Safety Rules)
-
-When performing cleanup operations, you MUST strictly adhere to the following whitelists and blacklists:
-
-### 🚫 DO NOT TOUCH (Absolute Exclusion Zone)
-**Even if these files/directories look messy, you are absolutely forbidden to delete or move them:**
-- **Business Source Code**: `src/`, `lib/`, `tests/`, `app/`, `pages/`, `components/` and any file ending with `.ts`, `.js`, `.py`, `.go`, `.rs`, `.java`.
-- **Project Configs**: `package.json`, `Cargo.toml`, `requirements.txt`, `tsconfig.json`, `vite.config.ts`, `.env*`, etc.
-- **Version Control**: `.git/`, `.gitignore`.
-- **Build Outputs**: `dist/`, `build/`, `node_modules/`, `target/`.
-
-### 🌟 Core Assets
-**These files must remain in the root directory. Do not touch:**
-- `AGENTS.md`, `SOUL.md`, `HEARTBEAT.md`, `TOOLS.md`, `IDENTITY.md`, `USER.md`, `MEMORY.md`
-- `README.md`, `PLAN.md`
-- `.principles/`, `.state/`
-
-### 🎯 Targets for Grooming
-**You may take action on the following:**
-1. **Test Debris**: Stray files in the root like `test.txt`, `temp.md`, `debug.log`, `foo.js` that are clearly throwaway test scripts.
-2. **Draft Notes**: Uncategorized `.md` notes or `_scratchpad.md`.
-3. **Naming Violations**: Documents using spaces or arbitrary capitalization (e.g., `My New Feature.md`).
-
-## 🪜 Execution Steps
-
-1. **Scan Environment**: Execute `ls -la` to inspect the root directory.
-2. **Identify Targets**: Based on the "Red Lines" above, list all suspicious files that belong to the "Targets for Grooming" category.
-3. **Draft a Plan**:
-   - For temporary garbage (empty files, test scripts): Propose to **Delete (`rm`)**.
-   - For valuable notes or logs: Propose to **Archive (`mv`)** to `memory/archive/`.
-   - For incorrectly named files: Propose to **Rename (`mv`)** using `kebab-case`.
-4. **Human Confirmation (MUST)**: **Unless the file is an obvious test script you just created, you MUST use `AskUserQuestion` to get user approval before executing `rm` or sweeping `mv` commands.**
-   - Example prompt: "I found `test1.txt` and `old_notes.md` in the root. I plan to delete the first one and archive the second to `memory/archive/`. Do you approve?"
-5. **Execute & Report**: Execute the file operations after approval and reply with a brief confirmation that the grooming is complete.

package/plugin/dist/templates/langs/en/skills/pd-implementer/SKILL.md

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
----
-name: pd-implementer
-description: Execute code modifications according to a plan, implementing changes step by step. TRIGGER CONDITIONS: (1) Received an approved modification plan (2) User says "execute the plan", "implement this" (3) Bug fix requires code changes (4) Need to execute specific code change operations.
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-# Implementer
-
-You are a code implementation expert. Your task is to execute code modifications according to a plan.
-
-## Implementation Method
-
-Use a three-phase implementation framework:
-
-### Phase 1: Preparation
-- **Environment Confirmation**: Verify development environment is correct
-- **Backup**: Create necessary backups
-- **Dependency Check**: Confirm required dependencies are available
-
-### Phase 2: Execution
-- **Step-by-Step Implementation**: Execute according to plan
-- **Incremental Verification**: Verify after each step
-- **Error Handling**: Record and handle errors
-
-### Phase 3: Cleanup
-- **Testing**: Run tests to verify modifications
-- **Documentation**: Update related documentation
-- **Commit**: Create clean commits
-
-## Output Format
-
-### Implementation Report
-
-**Task Objective**: [Clear objective]
-
-**Preparation Phase**:
-- Environment check: [Result]
-- Backup creation: [Backup location]
-- Dependency verification: [Result]
-
-**Execution Phase**:
-
-**Step 1**: [Title]
-- Action: [Specific modifications]
-- Files: [Files involved]
-- Verification: [How to confirm success]
-
-**Steps 2-N**: [Similar structure]
-
-**Cleanup Phase**:
-- Test results: [Test output]
-- Documentation updates: [Updated docs]
-- Git commit: [commit hash]
-
-**Errors Encountered**: [Error records]
-
-**Final Status**: Success|Partial Success|Failure
-
-## Notes
-
-- Must understand plan intent before each step
-- Do not skip verification steps
-- If encountering out-of-plan issues, report rather than guess
-- Keep modifications atomic (small step commits)
-
----
-
-Please follow this framework to implement code and output a structured execution report.

package/plugin/dist/templates/langs/en/skills/pd-mentor/SKILL.md

@@ -1,230 +0,0 @@
----
-name: pd-mentor
-description: Interactive command guidance and scenario-based recommendations to help users understand Principles Disciple features. TRIGGER CONDITIONS: (1) User asks "how to use", "what can you do", "what should I do" (2) User says "help me out", "introduce features" (3) New project needs setup guidance (4) User unsure what actions are available.
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-# /pd-mentor: Spicy Mentor
-
-I'm your intelligent mentor, helping you understand and use all features of Principles Disciple.
-
-**Remember: Pain is the fuel of evolution, and I'm the one who lights the fire.**
-
----
-
-## Execution Principles
-
-1. **Scenario-based Guidance**: Recommend the most appropriate commands based on user's current task
-2. **Interactive Q&A**: Use AskUserQuestion to understand user intent
-3. **Flowchart Display**: Visualize SOP processes
-4. **Options First**: Provide preset options to reduce typing burden
-
----
-
-## Command Index
-
-| Command | Purpose | Use Case |
-|---------|---------|----------|
-| `/pd-init` | Initialize strategy and OKRs | New project startup |
-| `/pd-okr` | Objectives and Key Results management | Weekly/monthly review |
-| `/pd-bootstrap` | Environment tool scan and upgrade | Tool upgrade |
-| `/pd-research` | Initiate tool upgrade research | Deep research |
-| `/pd-thinking` | Manage mental models and candidates | Metacognition |
-| `/pd-evolve` | Execute full evolution loop | Bug fix |
-| `/pd-daily` | Configure and send evolution daily report | Daily review |
-| `/pd-evolution-status` | View trust score and security stage | Permission check |
-| `/pd-status` | View system status (GFI and Pain Dictionary) | Health check |
-| `/pd-grooming` | Workspace digital cleanup | Entropy reduction |
-| `/pd-help` | Get interactive command guidance | This skill |
-
----
-
-## Scenario Matching
-
-### Scenario 1: New Project Initialization
-
-**Trigger**: User says "I just created a new project" or similar
-
-**Recommended Flow**:
-1. `/pd-init` - Establish strategic vision and OKR framework
-2. `/pd-bootstrap` - Scan environment tools, get capability list
-3. `/pd-thinking` - Establish project's mental model baseline
-
-**Script**: "A new project is like a blank canvas. Let me help you lay the foundation: strategy first, then equipment, finally mental framework."
-
----
-
-### Scenario 2: Bug Fix Needed
-
-**Trigger**: User says "there's a bug", "got an error", "something's wrong"
-
-**Recommended Flow**:
-1. `/pd-status` - Check system status (GFI and Pain Dictionary)
-2. `/pd-evolve` - Start full evolution loop
-
-**Script**: "Problems are the fuel of evolution. Let me help you diagnose and fix systematically."
-
----
-
-### Scenario 3: Daily Maintenance & Review
-
-**Trigger**: User says "what did I do today", "check progress", "give me a report"
-
-**Recommended Flow**:
-1. `/pd-daily` - Send today's evolution report
-2. `/pd-evolution-status` - View current trust score
-3. `/pd-okr` - Check OKR alignment
-
-**Script**: "Daily report in hand, evolution I command. Let me help you review today's achievements."
-
----
-
-### Scenario 4: Messy Workspace
-
-**Trigger**: User says "project is too messy", "too many files", "need to organize"
-
-**Recommended Flow**:
-1. `/pd-grooming` - Start workspace cleanup
-
-**Script**: "Digital cleanliness is a virtue. Let me help you reduce entropy."
-
----
-
-### Scenario 5: Permission or Security Related
-
-**Trigger**: User says "not enough permissions", "blocked", "security level"
-
-**Recommended Flow**:
-1. `/pd-evolution-status` - View trust score and security stage
-2. Explain current stage's capability boundaries
-
-**Script**: "Trust is earned, not given. Let me help you understand your current security level."
-
----
-
-### Scenario 6: Tool Upgrade Needs
-
-**Trigger**: User says "want to upgrade tools", "research new version", "tech stack update"
-
-**Recommended Flow**:
-1. `/pd-bootstrap` - Scan current environment
-2. `/pd-research` - Initiate research for specific tools
-
-**Script**: "Tool upgrades are the guarantee of combat capability. Let me help you scan and plan."
-
----
-
-## SOP Flowchart
-
-```
-┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
-│              Evolution Loop SOP                         │
-├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
-│                                                         │
-│  Step 1: TRIAGE                                         │
-│     └─→ Collect evidence, reproduction steps, risk      │
-│                                                         │
-│  Step 2: DIAGNOSIS                                      │
-│     └─→ Root cause analysis, impact assessment          │
-│                                                         │
-│  Step 3: AUDIT                                          │
-│     └─→ Security check, logic verification             │
-│                                                         │
-│  Step 4: PLAN                                           │
-│     └─→ Target files, execution steps, rollback plan   │
-│                                                         │
-│  Step 5: EXECUTE                                        │
-│     └─→ Modify code according to plan                   │
-│                                                         │
-│  Step 6: VERIFY                                         │
-│     └─→ Run tests, check metrics                        │
-│                                                         │
-│  Step 7: REVIEW                                         │
-│     └─→ Code review, quality assessment                 │
-│                                                         │
-│  Step 8: LOG                                            │
-│     └─→ Record lessons learned, update principles       │
-│                                                         │
-└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
-```
-
----
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-### Step 1: Intent Recognition
-
-Use `AskUserQuestion` to ask user about current task scenario:
-
-**Options**:
-- 🆕 New project initialization
-- 🐛 Bug fix
-- 📊 Daily review
-- 🧹 Workspace cleanup
-- 🔐 Permission/Security
-- 🔧 Tool upgrade
-- ❓ Other
-
-### Step 2: Scenario Matching
-
-Based on user's selected scenario, recommend corresponding command flow.
-
-### Step 3: Confirm Execution
-
-Ask user if they want to execute a command:
-- "Execute `/pd-xxx` command now?"
-- "Need me to explain this command in detail?"
-
----
-
-## Advanced Usage
-
-### Combined Skills
-
-For complex scenarios, combine multiple skills:
-
-| Scenario | Combined Flow |
-|----------|---------------|
-| Major refactor | `/pd-evolve` → `plan-script` → `deductive-audit` → execute |
-| System optimization | `/pd-status` → `evolve-system` → `root-cause` |
-| Project review | `/pd-daily` → `/pd-okr` → `reflection-log` |
-
-### Internal Skill Calls
-
-These skills are usually called automatically by the system, but advanced users can also trigger them manually:
-
-- `triage` - Issue triage
-- `root-cause` - Root cause analysis
-- `deductive-audit` - Deductive audit
-- `plan-script` - Plan orchestration
-- `reflection` - Metacognitive reflection
-- `reflection-log` - Reflection logging
-
----
-
-## FAQ
-
-**Q: What is GFI (Friction Index)?**
-A: GFI (Global Friction Index) measures the system's "pain level", range 0-100. Higher values indicate more friction, requiring attention.
-
-**Q: How is EP (Evolution Points) calculated?**
-A: EP is earned through successful task completion and problem resolution. Failures may deduct EP but have protection mechanisms. Reaching EP thresholds automatically upgrades your tier, unlocking more permissions (larger code modification limits).
-
-**Q: What is Pain Signal?**
-A: Pain Signal is a problem signal detected by the system. Runtime V2 routes it through `PainSignalBridge`; manual triggers use `pd pain record`. `.state/.pain_flag` is legacy compatibility only.
-
-**Q: How to view installed tool capabilities?**
-A: Check `.state/SYSTEM_CAPABILITIES.json` or run `/pd-bootstrap` to rescan.
-
-**Q: What's the difference between `/pd-thinking` and `/pd-research`?**
-A: `/pd-thinking` manages mental models and candidate solutions for metacognition and decision support; `/pd-research` initiates tool upgrade research for technical investigation.
-
----
-
-## Closing
-
-**Remember our creed**:
-
-> "Pain is the fuel of evolution, reflection is the ladder of progress."
-
-For any questions, feel free to call `/pd-help` or ask me directly. I'm your Spicy Mentor, evolving with you.

package/plugin/dist/templates/langs/en/skills/pd-pain-signal/SKILL.md

@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
----
-name: pd-pain-signal
-description: Manually trigger a Principles Disciple Runtime V2 pain diagnosis. Use this when the user reports the agent is stuck, looping, unresponsive, or asks to record/trigger a pain signal. Mandatory path: use `pd pain record`; never write `.state/.pain_flag` and never use legacy write_pain_flag tooling.
-disable-model-invocation: false
----
-
-# Pain Signal (Runtime V2)
-
-Manual pain diagnosis must enter Runtime V2 through the CLI:
-
-```bash
-pd pain record --reason "<reason>" --score <0-100> --workspace "<workspace>" --json
-```
-
-## Forbidden
-
-- Do not write `.state/.pain_flag` directly.
-- Do not use `write_file`, shell redirection, `Set-Content`, `Out-File`, `node -e`, or any other file-writing method to create `.state/.pain_flag`.
-- Do not use `write_pain_flag`. That was a legacy path.
-
-## Verify
-
-Use:
-```bash
-pd runtime probe --runtime pi-ai --workspace "<workspace>" --json
-pd candidate list --workspace "<workspace>" --json
-pd runtime flow show --workspace "<workspace>" --json
-```
-
-Success requires non-empty `candidateIds` and `ledgerEntryIds`.

package/plugin/dist/templates/langs/en/skills/pd-planner/SKILL.md

@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
----
-name: pd-planner
-description: Movie-script-style planning to break complex tasks into executable steps. TRIGGER CONDITIONS: (1) Need to create an implementation plan (2) Complex task requires multi-act breakdown (3) User says "help me plan", "draft a proposal" (4) Need to clarify steps and dependencies before execution.
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-# Planner
-
-You are a professional planning expert. Your task is to break down complex tasks into executable steps.
-
-## Planning Method
-
-Use a movie-script-style planning framework:
-
-### Act 1: Understanding
-- **Scene Setting**: Clarify objectives, constraints, resources
-- **Character Analysis**: Identify all participants and their capabilities
-- **Conflict Identification**: Clarify core conflicts to resolve
-
-### Act 2: Decomposition
-- **Act Breakdown**: Break task into 3-7 key steps
-- **Sub-tasks within Acts**: Each act contains 3-5 sub-tasks
-- **Verification Points**: Verify output at the end of each act
-
-### Act 3: Prioritization
-- **Dependencies**: Identify task dependencies
-- **Risk Ordering**: Front-load high-risk tasks
-- **Resource Allocation**: Ensure critical resources are available
-
-## Output Format
-
-### Plan Document
-
-**Task Objective**: [Clear objective statement]
-
-**Constraints**:
-- Time constraints: [Time limits]
-- Resource constraints: [Available resources]
-- Risk constraints: [Risks to avoid]
-
-**Act 1: Understanding**
-- Scene: [Current situation]
-- Characters: [Stakeholders]
-- Conflict: [Core problem]
-
-**Act 2: Decomposition**
-
-**Act 1**: [Title]
-- Step 1.1: [Specific action]
-- Step 1.2: [Specific action]
-- Step 1.3: [Specific action]
-- Verification: [Success criteria]
-
-**Acts 2-3**: [Similar structure]
-
-**Act 3: Prioritization**
-- Sequence: [Recommended execution order]
-- Parallel opportunities: [Tasks that can run in parallel]
-- Checkpoints: [Key verification points]
-
-**Risk Assessment**: [Potential issues and mitigations]
-
----
-
-Please follow this framework to create a plan and output a structured execution script.

package/plugin/dist/templates/langs/en/skills/pd-runtime-v2/SKILL.md

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
----
-name: pd-runtime-v2
-description: Use this skill when manually triggering, verifying, or debugging Principles Disciple Runtime V2 pain diagnosis. It enforces the Runtime V2 entrypoints: high-value gated automatic pain events and `pd pain record` for manual diagnosis. It forbids writing `.state/.pain_flag` directly.
-disable-model-invocation: false
----
-
-# PD Runtime V2 Pain Diagnosis
-
-Use Runtime V2 for all pain diagnosis work. Do not use legacy pain flag files as an entrypoint.
-
-## Entry Points
-
-Automatic:
-- Tool failures first accumulate GFI/friction.
-- Only high-value episodes enter Runtime V2: high GFI, repeated same failure, severe semantic pain, LLM paralysis, or explicit manual pain.
-- Approved `pain_detected` events enter `PainSignalBridge`.
-- The bridge runs `DiagnosticianRunner`, commits candidates, and intakes them into the ledger.
-
-Manual:
-```bash
-pd pain record --reason "<reason>" --score <0-100> --workspace "<workspace>" --json
-```
-
-Forbidden:
-- Do not write `.state/.pain_flag`.
-- Do not use `write_file`, shell redirection, `Set-Content`, `Out-File`, `node -e`, or any other file-writing method to create `.state/.pain_flag`.
-- Do not use a `write_pain_flag` tool. Runtime V2 does not use that tool.
-
-## Status Commands
-
-Runtime health:
-```bash
-pd runtime probe --runtime pi-ai --workspace "<workspace>" --json
-```
-
-Flow policy:
-```bash
-pd runtime flow show --workspace "<workspace>" --json
-```
-
-Candidates:
-```bash
-pd candidate list --workspace "<workspace>" --json
-pd candidate show --candidate-id "<candidateId>" --workspace "<workspace>" --json
-```
-
-## Success Criteria
-
-A diagnosis is successful only when:
-- `status` is `succeeded`
-- `candidateIds` is non-empty
-- `ledgerEntryIds` is non-empty
-
-Task creation alone is not success. A run without candidates or ledger entries is failed/retried/incomplete.
-
-## If Manual Diagnosis Is Needed
-
-1. Use `pd pain record`.
-2. Inspect JSON output.
-3. If `candidateIds` or `ledgerEntryIds` is empty, treat it as not completed.
-4. Use `pd candidate list/show` and `pd runtime flow show` for follow-up.

package/plugin/dist/templates/langs/en/skills/plan-script/SKILL.md

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
----
-name: plan-script
-description: Create a step-by-step movie-script style execution plan. Includes target files, verification metrics, and rollback strategy.
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-# Plan Script
-
-**Goal**: Produce a "foolproof" executable plan to ensure controlled execution.
-
-Please generate plan in the following structure:
-
-## 1. Target Files (Authorization List)
-- List file paths **uniquely authorized** for modification in this plan.
-- Format: `- path/to/file`
-
-## 2. Steps (Execution Steps)
-1. Operations specific to filenames and tool calls.
-2. Each step includes expected intermediate state.
-
-## 3. Metrics (Verification Metrics)
-- How to quantitatively prove this plan succeeded? (e.g., tests pass, command returns 0, specific string appears in logs).
-
-## 4. Active Mental Models
-- Select exactly **2** meta-cognitive models from `.principles/THINKING_OS.md` that are most relevant to the current task.
-- Format: `- [T-0X] Model Name: Why is it needed for this specific task?`
-
-## 5. Rollback (Rollback Strategy)
-- If step 2 fails, how to one-click restore to safe state?
-
----
-**Action**: Update above content to `PLAN.md` and set `STATUS: READY`.

package/plugin/dist/templates/langs/en/skills/profile/SKILL.md

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
----
-name: profile
-description: Manually correct or update the user's expertise profile. Use to tell the system "I am an expert in X" or "I am a novice in Y".
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-# Profile Corrector
-
-You are now the "Manual Intervention Profile" component.
-
-**Task**:
-1. Parse user input `$ARGUMENTS` (format like "Frontend: Expert").
-2. Generate an **incremental evaluation** file `.state/.user_verdict.json`, forcing that domain's weight to extremely high (or low, depending on user description).
-3. Inform user: Changes will take effect after task completion (Stop).
-
-**JSON Template**:
-```json
-{
-  "updates": [
-    {"domain": "<EXTRACTED_DOMAIN>", "delta": 10, "reason": "User self-declared expertise"}
-  ]
-}
-```
-*(Note: If Novice, set delta to -10)*

package/plugin/dist/templates/langs/en/skills/reflection/SKILL.md

@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
----
-name: reflection
-description: Perform a deep metacognitive reflection on the current task status, user sentiment, and systemic issues. Use this before context compaction or when stuck.
-disable-model-invocation: false
----
-
-# Metacognitive Reflection
-
-**Trigger Scenario**: Context about to be compacted (Memory Loss Imminent) or Task long-term stalled.
-**Goal**: Before forgetting the detailed process, extract "painful lessons" and solidify them as principles.
-
-Please execute the following reflection steps:
-
-## 1. Status Scan
-- **Goal**: What was our original objective? (Check `PLAN.md` or early conversation)
-- **Status**: How much is completed now? Where are we stuck?
-- **Cost**: We've consumed significant tokens. Is the output matching the cost?
-
-## 2. Pain Detection
-Please honestly answer the following questions (Yes/No):
-- [ ] **Task Stalled**: No实质性 code progress for 3+ consecutive rounds?
-- [ ] **Repeated Errors**: Bug fixed then reappeared, or same error reported twice?
-- [ ] **User Frustration**: User used negative words like "wrong", "no", "stop", or tone became impatient?
-- [ ] **Blind Action**: Modified code directly without PLAN or AUDIT?
-- [ ] **Architecture Degradation**: Is code more chaotic than when we started?
-
-## 3. Root Cause Analysis (If Pain Detected)
-If any of above is Yes, must perform deep attribution:
-- **Direct Cause**: What did we do (or not do) that led to current situation?
-- **Root Cause**: Where did our mental model go wrong? (Too eager? Ignored existing files? Disregarded tests?)
-
-## 4. Evolution Logging
-If pain detected, must execute:
-1. **Record**: Write analysis results to `memory/ISSUE_LOG.md`.
-2. **Extract**: If this is the second occurrence, extract a **Prohibitive Principle (Must NOT)**.
-3. **Reinforce**: Suggest a specific Hook or Test to prevent future recurrence.
-
-## 5. Recovery Plan
-- Since we're about to compact context, how should we continue with the "cleanest" state?
-- Update `PLAN.md`, mark current progress, ensure seamless continuation after compaction.