create-byan-agent 2.18.0 → 2.19.1

package/install/templates/_byan/workflow/simple/generate-project-context/steps/step-02-generate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
+# Step 2: Context Rules Generation
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between technical peers
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+- 💬 FOCUS on unobvious rules that AI agents need to be reminded of
+- 🎯 KEEP CONTENT LEAN - optimize for LLM context efficiency
+- ⚠️ ABSOLUTELY NO TIME ESTIMATES - AI development speed has fundamentally changed
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
+- 📝 Focus on specific, actionable rules rather than general advice
+- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after each major rule category
+- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
+- 📖 Update frontmatter with completed sections
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until all sections are complete
+
+## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
+
+This step will generate content and present choices for each rule category:
+
+- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to explore nuanced implementation rules
+- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to identify critical edge cases
+- **C (Continue)**: Save the current rules and proceed to next category
+
+## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
+
+- When 'A' selected: Execute {project-root}/_byan/workflow/simple/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml
+- When 'P' selected: Execute {project-root}/_byan/workflow/simple/party-mode
+- PROTOCOLS always return to display this step's A/P/C menu after the A or P have completed
+- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Discovery results from step-1 are available
+- Technology stack and existing patterns are identified
+- Focus on rules that prevent implementation mistakes
+- Prioritize unobvious details that AI agents might miss
+
+## YOUR TASK:
+
+Collaboratively generate specific, critical rules that AI agents must follow when implementing code in this project.
+
+## CONTEXT GENERATION SEQUENCE:
+
+### 1. Technology Stack & Versions
+
+Document the exact technology stack from discovery:
+
+**Core Technologies:**
+Based on user skill level, present findings:
+
+**Expert Mode:**
+"Technology stack from your architecture and package files:
+{{exact_technologies_with_versions}}
+
+Any critical version constraints I should document for agents?"
+
+**Intermediate Mode:**
+"I found your technology stack:
+
+**Core Technologies:**
+{{main_technologies_with_versions}}
+
+**Key Dependencies:**
+{{important_dependencies_with_versions}}
+
+Are there any version constraints or compatibility notes agents should know about?"
+
+**Beginner Mode:**
+"Here are the technologies you're using:
+
+**Main Technologies:**
+{{friendly_description_of_tech_stack}}
+
+**Important Notes:**
+{{key_things_agents_need_to_know_about_versions}}
+
+Should I document any special version rules or compatibility requirements?"
+
+### 2. Language-Specific Rules
+
+Focus on unobvious language patterns agents might miss:
+
+**TypeScript/JavaScript Rules:**
+"Based on your codebase, I notice some specific patterns:
+
+**Configuration Requirements:**
+{{typescript_config_rules}}
+
+**Import/Export Patterns:**
+{{import_export_conventions}}
+
+**Error Handling Patterns:**
+{{error_handling_requirements}}
+
+Are these patterns correct? Any other language-specific rules agents should follow?"
+
+**Python/Ruby/Other Language Rules:**
+Adapt to the actual language in use with similar focused questions.
+
+### 3. Framework-Specific Rules
+
+Document framework-specific patterns:
+
+**React Rules (if applicable):**
+"For React development, I see these patterns:
+
+**Hooks Usage:**
+{{hooks_usage_patterns}}
+
+**Component Structure:**
+{{component_organization_rules}}
+
+**State Management:**
+{{state_management_patterns}}
+
+**Performance Rules:**
+{{performance_optimization_requirements}}
+
+Should I add any other React-specific rules?"
+
+**Other Framework Rules:**
+Adapt for Vue, Angular, Next.js, Express, etc.
+
+### 4. Testing Rules
+
+Focus on testing patterns that ensure consistency:
+
+**Test Structure Rules:**
+"Your testing setup shows these patterns:
+
+**Test Organization:**
+{{test_file_organization}}
+
+**Mock Usage:**
+{{mock_patterns_and_conventions}}
+
+**Test Coverage Requirements:**
+{{coverage_expectations}}
+
+**Integration vs Unit Test Rules:**
+{{test_boundary_patterns}}
+
+Are there testing rules agents should always follow?"
+
+### 5. Code Quality & Style Rules
+
+Document critical style and quality rules:
+
+**Linting/Formatting:**
+"Your code style configuration requires:
+
+**ESLint/Prettier Rules:**
+{{specific_linting_rules}}
+
+**Code Organization:**
+{{file_and_folder_structure_rules}}
+
+**Naming Conventions:**
+{{naming_patterns_agents_must_follow}}
+
+**Documentation Requirements:**
+{{comment_and_documentation_patterns}}
+
+Any additional code quality rules?"
+
+### 6. Development Workflow Rules
+
+Document workflow patterns that affect implementation:
+
+**Git/Repository Rules:**
+"Your project uses these patterns:
+
+**Branch Naming:**
+{{branch_naming_conventions}}
+
+**Commit Message Format:**
+{{commit_message_patterns}}
+
+**PR Requirements:**
+{{pull_request_checklist}}
+
+**Deployment Patterns:**
+{{deployment_considerations}}
+
+Should I document any other workflow rules?"
+
+### 7. Critical Don't-Miss Rules
+
+Identify rules that prevent common mistakes:
+
+**Anti-Patterns to Avoid:**
+"Based on your codebase, here are critical things agents must NOT do:
+
+{{critical_anti_patterns_with_examples}}
+
+**Edge Cases:**
+{{specific_edge_cases_agents_should_handle}}
+
+**Security Rules:**
+{{security_considerations_agents_must_follow}}
+
+**Performance Gotchas:**
+{{performance_patterns_to_avoid}}
+
+Are there other 'gotchas' agents should know about?"
+
+### 8. Generate Context Content
+
+For each category, prepare lean content for the project context file:
+
+#### Content Structure:
+
+```markdown
+## Technology Stack & Versions
+
+{{concise_technology_list_with_exact_versions}}
+
+## Critical Implementation Rules
+
+### Language-Specific Rules
+
+{{bullet_points_of_critical_language_rules}}
+
+### Framework-Specific Rules
+
+{{bullet_points_of_framework_patterns}}
+
+### Testing Rules
+
+{{bullet_points_of_testing_requirements}}
+
+### Code Quality & Style Rules
+
+{{bullet_points_of_style_and_quality_rules}}
+
+### Development Workflow Rules
+
+{{bullet_points_of_workflow_patterns}}
+
+### Critical Don't-Miss Rules
+
+{{bullet_points_of_anti_patterns_and_edge_cases}}
+```
+
+### 9. Present Content and Menu
+
+After each category, show the generated rules and present choices:
+
+"I've drafted the {{category_name}} rules for your project context.
+
+**Here's what I'll add:**
+
+[Show the complete markdown content for this category]
+
+**What would you like to do?**
+[A] Advanced Elicitation - Explore nuanced rules for this category
+[P] Party Mode - Review from different implementation perspectives
+[C] Continue - Save these rules and move to next category"
+
+### 10. Handle Menu Selection
+
+#### If 'A' (Advanced Elicitation):
+
+- Execute advanced-elicitation.xml with current category rules
+- Process enhanced rules that come back
+- Ask user: "Accept these enhanced rules for {{category}}? (y/n)"
+- If yes: Update content, then return to A/P/C menu
+- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
+
+#### If 'P' (Party Mode):
+
+- Execute party-mode workflow with category rules context
+- Process collaborative insights on implementation patterns
+- Ask user: "Accept these changes to {{category}} rules? (y/n)"
+- If yes: Update content, then return to A/P/C menu
+- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
+
+#### If 'C' (Continue):
+
+- Save the current category content to project context file
+- Update frontmatter: `sections_completed: [...]`
+- Proceed to next category or step-03 if complete
+
+## APPEND TO PROJECT CONTEXT:
+
+When user selects 'C' for a category, append the content directly to `{output_folder}/project-context.md` using the structure from step 8.
+
+## SUCCESS METRICS:
+
+✅ All critical technology versions accurately documented
+✅ Language-specific rules cover unobvious patterns
+✅ Framework rules capture project-specific conventions
+✅ Testing rules ensure consistent test quality
+✅ Code quality rules maintain project standards
+✅ Workflow rules prevent implementation conflicts
+✅ Content is lean and optimized for LLM context
+✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly for each category
+
+## FAILURE MODES:
+
+❌ Including obvious rules that agents already know
+❌ Making content too verbose for LLM context efficiency
+❌ Missing critical anti-patterns or edge cases
+❌ Not getting user validation for each rule category
+❌ Not documenting exact versions and configurations
+❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
+
+## NEXT STEP:
+
+After completing all rule categories and user selects 'C' for the final category, load `./step-03-complete.md` to finalize the project context file.
+
+Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-03 until all categories are complete and user explicitly selects 'C' for each!

package/install/templates/_byan/workflow/simple/generate-project-context/workflow.md

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+---
+name: generate-project-context
+description: Creates a concise project-context.md file with critical rules and patterns that AI agents must follow when implementing code. Optimized for LLM context efficiency.
+---
+
+# Generate Project Context Workflow
+
+**Goal:** Create a concise, optimized `project-context.md` file containing critical rules, patterns, and guidelines that AI agents must follow when implementing code. This file focuses on unobvious details that LLMs need to be reminded of.
+
+**Your Role:** You are a technical facilitator working with a peer to capture the essential implementation rules that will ensure consistent, high-quality code generation across all AI agents working on the project.
+
+---
+
+## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
+
+This uses **micro-file architecture** for disciplined execution:
+
+- Each step is a self-contained file with embedded rules
+- Sequential progression with user control at each step
+- Document state tracked in frontmatter
+- Focus on lean, LLM-optimized content generation
+- You NEVER proceed to a step file if the current step file indicates the user must approve and indicate continuation.
+
+---
+
+## INITIALIZATION
+
+### Configuration Loading
+
+Load config from `{project-root}/_byan/bmm/config.yaml` and resolve:
+
+- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `user_name`
+- `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `user_skill_level`
+- `date` as system-generated current datetime
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+### Paths
+
+- `installed_path` = `{project-root}/_byan/workflow/simple/generate-project-context`
+- `template_path` = `{installed_path}/project-context-template.md`
+- `output_file` = `{output_folder}/project-context.md`
+
+---
+
+## EXECUTION
+
+Load and execute `steps/step-01-discover.md` to begin the workflow.
+
+**Note:** Input document discovery and initialization protocols are handled in step-01-discover.md.

package/install/templates/_byan/workflow/simple/innovation-strategy/instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,276 @@
+# Innovation Strategy Workflow Instructions
+
+<critical>The workflow execution engine is governed by: {project-root}/_byan/command/workflow.xml</critical>
+<critical>You MUST have already loaded and processed: {project-root}/_byan/workflow/simple/innovation-strategy/workflow.yaml</critical>
+<critical>Load and understand innovation frameworks from: {innovation_frameworks}</critical>
+<critical>⚠️ ABSOLUTELY NO TIME ESTIMATES - NEVER mention hours, days, weeks, months, or ANY time-based predictions. AI has fundamentally changed development speed - what once took teams weeks/months can now be done by one person in hours. DO NOT give ANY time estimates whatsoever.</critical>
+<critical>⚠️ CHECKPOINT PROTOCOL: After EVERY <template-output> tag, you MUST follow workflow.xml substep 2c: SAVE content to file immediately → SHOW checkpoint separator (━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━) → DISPLAY generated content → PRESENT options [a]Advanced Elicitation/[c]Continue/[p]Party-Mode/[y]YOLO → WAIT for user response. Never batch saves or skip checkpoints.</critical>
+
+<facilitation-principles>
+  YOU ARE A STRATEGIC INNOVATION ADVISOR:
+  - Demand brutal truth about market realities before innovation exploration
+  - Challenge assumptions ruthlessly - comfortable illusions kill strategies
+  - Balance bold vision with pragmatic execution
+  - Focus on sustainable competitive advantage, not clever features
+  - Push for evidence-based decisions over hopeful guesses
+  - Celebrate strategic clarity when achieved
+</facilitation-principles>
+
+<workflow>
+
+<step n="1" goal="Establish strategic context">
+Understand the strategic situation and objectives:
+
+Ask the user:
+
+- What company or business are we analyzing?
+- What's driving this strategic exploration? (market pressure, new opportunity, plateau, etc.)
+- What's your current business model in brief?
+- What constraints or boundaries exist? (resources, timeline, regulatory)
+- What would breakthrough success look like?
+
+Load any context data provided via the data attribute.
+
+Synthesize into clear strategic framing.
+
+<template-output>company_name</template-output>
+<template-output>strategic_focus</template-output>
+<template-output>current_situation</template-output>
+<template-output>strategic_challenge</template-output>
+</step>
+
+<step n="2" goal="Analyze market landscape and competitive dynamics">
+Conduct thorough market analysis using strategic frameworks. Explain in your own voice why unflinching clarity about market realities must precede innovation exploration.
+
+Review market analysis frameworks from {innovation_frameworks} (category: market_analysis) and select 2-4 most relevant to the strategic context. Consider:
+
+- Stage of business (startup vs established)
+- Industry maturity
+- Available market data
+- Strategic priorities
+
+Offer selected frameworks with guidance on what each reveals. Common options:
+
+- **TAM SAM SOM Analysis** - For sizing opportunity
+- **Five Forces Analysis** - For industry structure
+- **Competitive Positioning Map** - For differentiation analysis
+- **Market Timing Assessment** - For innovation timing
+
+Key questions to explore:
+
+- What market segments exist and how are they evolving?
+- Who are the real competitors (including non-obvious ones)?
+- What substitutes threaten your value proposition?
+- What's changing in the market that creates opportunity or threat?
+- Where are customers underserved or overserved?
+
+<template-output>market_landscape</template-output>
+<template-output>competitive_dynamics</template-output>
+<template-output>market_opportunities</template-output>
+<template-output>market_insights</template-output>
+</step>
+
+<step n="3" goal="Analyze current business model">
+<energy-checkpoint>
+Check in: "We've covered market landscape. How's your energy? This next part - deconstructing your business model - requires honest self-assessment. Ready?"
+</energy-checkpoint>
+
+Deconstruct the existing business model to identify strengths and weaknesses. Explain in your own voice why understanding current model vulnerabilities is essential before innovation.
+
+Review business model frameworks from {innovation_frameworks} (category: business_model) and select 2-3 appropriate for the business type. Consider:
+
+- Business maturity (early stage vs mature)
+- Complexity of model
+- Key strategic questions
+
+Offer selected frameworks. Common options:
+
+- **Business Model Canvas** - For comprehensive mapping
+- **Value Proposition Canvas** - For product-market fit
+- **Revenue Model Innovation** - For monetization analysis
+- **Cost Structure Innovation** - For efficiency opportunities
+
+Critical questions:
+
+- Who are you really serving and what jobs are they hiring you for?
+- How do you create, deliver, and capture value today?
+- What's your defensible competitive advantage (be honest)?
+- Where is your model vulnerable to disruption?
+- What assumptions underpin your model that might be wrong?
+
+<template-output>current_business_model</template-output>
+<template-output>value_proposition</template-output>
+<template-output>revenue_cost_structure</template-output>
+<template-output>model_weaknesses</template-output>
+</step>
+
+<step n="4" goal="Identify disruption opportunities">
+Hunt for disruption vectors and strategic openings. Explain in your own voice what makes disruption different from incremental innovation.
+
+Review disruption frameworks from {innovation_frameworks} (category: disruption) and select 2-3 most applicable. Consider:
+
+- Industry disruption potential
+- Customer job analysis needs
+- Platform opportunity existence
+
+Offer selected frameworks with context. Common options:
+
+- **Disruptive Innovation Theory** - For finding overlooked segments
+- **Jobs to be Done** - For unmet needs analysis
+- **Blue Ocean Strategy** - For uncontested market space
+- **Platform Revolution** - For network effect plays
+
+Provocative questions:
+
+- Who are the NON-consumers you could serve?
+- What customer jobs are massively underserved?
+- What would be "good enough" for a new segment?
+- What technology enablers create sudden strategic openings?
+- Where could you make the competition irrelevant?
+
+<template-output>disruption_vectors</template-output>
+<template-output>unmet_jobs</template-output>
+<template-output>technology_enablers</template-output>
+<template-output>strategic_whitespace</template-output>
+</step>
+
+<step n="5" goal="Generate innovation opportunities">
+<energy-checkpoint>
+Check in: "We've identified disruption vectors. How are you feeling? Ready to generate concrete innovation opportunities?"
+</energy-checkpoint>
+
+Develop concrete innovation options across multiple vectors. Explain in your own voice the importance of exploring multiple innovation paths before committing.
+
+Review strategic and value_chain frameworks from {innovation_frameworks} (categories: strategic, value_chain) and select 2-4 that fit the strategic context. Consider:
+
+- Innovation ambition (core vs transformational)
+- Value chain position
+- Partnership opportunities
+
+Offer selected frameworks. Common options:
+
+- **Three Horizons Framework** - For portfolio balance
+- **Value Chain Analysis** - For activity selection
+- **Partnership Strategy** - For ecosystem thinking
+- **Business Model Patterns** - For proven approaches
+
+Generate 5-10 specific innovation opportunities addressing:
+
+- Business model innovations (how you create/capture value)
+- Value chain innovations (what activities you own)
+- Partnership and ecosystem opportunities
+- Technology-enabled transformations
+
+<template-output>innovation_initiatives</template-output>
+<template-output>business_model_innovation</template-output>
+<template-output>value_chain_opportunities</template-output>
+<template-output>partnership_opportunities</template-output>
+</step>
+
+<step n="6" goal="Develop and evaluate strategic options">
+Synthesize insights into 3 distinct strategic options.
+
+For each option:
+
+- Clear description of strategic direction
+- Business model implications
+- Competitive positioning
+- Resource requirements
+- Key risks and dependencies
+- Expected outcomes and timeline
+
+Evaluate each option against:
+
+- Strategic fit with capabilities
+- Market timing and readiness
+- Competitive defensibility
+- Resource feasibility
+- Risk vs reward profile
+
+<template-output>option_a_name</template-output>
+<template-output>option_a_description</template-output>
+<template-output>option_a_pros</template-output>
+<template-output>option_a_cons</template-output>
+<template-output>option_b_name</template-output>
+<template-output>option_b_description</template-output>
+<template-output>option_b_pros</template-output>
+<template-output>option_b_cons</template-output>
+<template-output>option_c_name</template-output>
+<template-output>option_c_description</template-output>
+<template-output>option_c_pros</template-output>
+<template-output>option_c_cons</template-output>
+</step>
+
+<step n="7" goal="Recommend strategic direction">
+Make bold recommendation with clear rationale.
+
+Synthesize into recommended strategy:
+
+- Which option (or combination) is recommended?
+- Why this direction over alternatives?
+- What makes you confident (and what scares you)?
+- What hypotheses MUST be validated first?
+- What would cause you to pivot or abandon?
+
+Define critical success factors:
+
+- What capabilities must be built or acquired?
+- What partnerships are essential?
+- What market conditions must hold?
+- What execution excellence is required?
+
+<template-output>recommended_strategy</template-output>
+<template-output>key_hypotheses</template-output>
+<template-output>success_factors</template-output>
+</step>
+
+<step n="8" goal="Build execution roadmap">
+<energy-checkpoint>
+Check in: "We've got the strategy direction. How's your energy for the execution planning - turning strategy into actionable roadmap?"
+</energy-checkpoint>
+
+Create phased roadmap with clear milestones.
+
+Structure in three phases:
+
+- **Phase 1 - Immediate Impact**: Quick wins, hypothesis validation, initial momentum
+- **Phase 2 - Foundation Building**: Capability development, market entry, systematic growth
+- **Phase 3 - Scale & Optimization**: Market expansion, efficiency gains, competitive positioning
+
+For each phase:
+
+- Key initiatives and deliverables
+- Resource requirements
+- Success metrics
+- Decision gates
+
+<template-output>phase_1</template-output>
+<template-output>phase_2</template-output>
+<template-output>phase_3</template-output>
+</step>
+
+<step n="9" goal="Define metrics and risk mitigation">
+Establish measurement framework and risk management.
+
+Define success metrics:
+
+- **Leading indicators** - Early signals of strategy working (engagement, adoption, efficiency)
+- **Lagging indicators** - Business outcomes (revenue, market share, profitability)
+- **Decision gates** - Go/no-go criteria at key milestones
+
+Identify and mitigate key risks:
+
+- What could kill this strategy?
+- What assumptions might be wrong?
+- What competitive responses could occur?
+- How do we de-risk systematically?
+- What's our backup plan?
+
+<template-output>leading_indicators</template-output>
+<template-output>lagging_indicators</template-output>
+<template-output>decision_gates</template-output>
+<template-output>key_risks</template-output>
+<template-output>risk_mitigation</template-output>
+</step>
+
+</workflow>

package/install/templates/_byan/workflow/simple/innovation-strategy/workflow.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# Innovation Strategy Workflow Configuration
+name: "innovation-strategy"
+description: "Identify disruption opportunities and architect business model innovation. This workflow guides strategic analysis of markets, competitive dynamics, and business model innovation to uncover sustainable competitive advantages and breakthrough opportunities."
+author: "BMad"
+
+# Critical variables load from config_source
+config_source: "{project-root}/_byan/cis/config.yaml"
+output_folder: "{config_source}:output_folder"
+user_name: "{config_source}:user_name"
+communication_language: "{config_source}:communication_language"
+date: system-generated
+
+# Context can be provided via data attribute when invoking
+# Example: data="{path}/industry-analysis.md" provides market context
+
+# Module path and component files
+installed_path: "{project-root}/_byan/workflow/simple/innovation-strategy"
+template: "{installed_path}/template.md"
+instructions: "{installed_path}/instructions.md"
+
+# Required Data Files
+innovation_frameworks: "{installed_path}/innovation-frameworks.csv"
+
+# Output configuration
+default_output_file: "{output_folder}/innovation-strategy-{{date}}.md"
+
+standalone: true