create-byan-agent 2.18.0 → 2.19.1

package/install/templates/_byan/bmm/module-help.csv

@@ -1,38 +1,38 @@
 module,phase,name,code,sequence,workflow-file,command,required,agent,options,description,output-location,outputs,
-bmm,anytime,Document Project,DP,,_byan/bmm/workflows/document-project/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-document-project,false,analyst,Create Mode,"Analyze an existing project to produce useful documentation",project-knowledge,*,
-bmm,anytime,Generate Project Context,GPC,,_byan/bmm/workflows/generate-project-context/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-generate-project-context,false,analyst,Create Mode,"Scan existing codebase to generate a lean LLM-optimized project-context.md containing critical implementation rules patterns and conventions for AI agents. Essential for brownfield projects and quick-flow.",output_folder,"project context",
-bmm,anytime,Quick Spec,QS,,_byan/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/quick-spec/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-quick-spec,false,quick-flow-solo-dev,Create Mode,"Do not suggest for potentially very complex things unless requested or if the user complains that they do not want to follow the extensive planning of the bmad method. Quick one-off tasks small changes simple apps brownfield additions to well established patterns utilities without extensive planning",planning_artifacts,"tech spec",
-bmm,anytime,Quick Dev,QD,,_byan/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/quick-dev/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-quick-dev,false,quick-flow-solo-dev,Create Mode,"Quick one-off tasks small changes simple apps utilities without extensive planning - Do not suggest for potentially very complex things unless requested or if the user complains that they do not want to follow the extensive planning of the bmad method, unless the user is already working through the implementation phase and just requests a 1 off things not already in the plan",,,
-bmm,anytime,Correct Course,CC,,_byan/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/correct-course/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-correct-course,false,sm,Create Mode,"Anytime: Navigate significant changes. May recommend start over update PRD redo architecture sprint planning or correct epics and stories",planning_artifacts,"change proposal",
-bmm,anytime,Create Dataflow,CDF,,_byan/bmm/workflows/excalidraw-diagrams/create-dataflow/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-create-excalidraw-dataflow,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Create data flow diagrams (DFD) in Excalidraw format - can be called standalone or during any workflow to add visual documentation",planning_artifacts,"dataflow diagram",
-bmm,anytime,Create Diagram,CED,,_byan/bmm/workflows/excalidraw-diagrams/create-diagram/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-create-excalidraw-diagram,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Create system architecture diagrams ERDs UML diagrams or general technical diagrams in Excalidraw format - use anytime or call from architecture workflow to add visual documentation",planning_artifacts,"diagram",
-bmm,anytime,Create Flowchart,CFC,,_byan/bmm/workflows/excalidraw-diagrams/create-flowchart/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-create-excalidraw-flowchart,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Create a flowchart visualization in Excalidraw format for processes pipelines or logic flows - use anytime or during architecture to add process documentation",planning_artifacts,"flowchart",
-bmm,anytime,Create Wireframe,CEW,,_byan/bmm/workflows/excalidraw-diagrams/create-wireframe/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-create-excalidraw-wireframe,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Create website or app wireframes in Excalidraw format - use anytime standalone or call from UX workflow to add UI mockups",planning_artifacts,"wireframe",
-bmm,anytime,Write Document,WD,,_byan/bmm/agents/tech-writer/tech-writer.agent.yaml,bmad-bmm-write-document,false,tech-writer,,"Describe in detail what you want, and the agent will follow the documentation best practices defined in agent memory. Multi-turn conversation with subprocess for research/review.",project-knowledge,"document",
-bmm,anytime,Update Standards,US,,_byan/bmm/agents/tech-writer/tech-writer.agent.yaml,bmad-bmm-update-standards,false,tech-writer,,"Update agent memory documentation-standards.md with your specific preferences if you discover missing document conventions.",_byan/_memory/tech-writer-sidecar,"standards",
-bmm,anytime,Mermaid Generate,MG,,_byan/bmm/agents/tech-writer/tech-writer.agent.yaml,bmad-bmm-mermaid-generate,false,tech-writer,,"Create a Mermaid diagram based on user description. Will suggest diagram types if not specified.",planning_artifacts,"mermaid diagram",
-bmm,anytime,Validate Document,VD,,_byan/bmm/agents/tech-writer/tech-writer.agent.yaml,bmad-bmm-validate-document,false,tech-writer,,"Review the specified document against documentation standards and best practices. Returns specific actionable improvement suggestions organized by priority.",planning_artifacts,"validation report",
-bmm,anytime,Explain Concept,EC,,_byan/bmm/agents/tech-writer/tech-writer.agent.yaml,bmad-bmm-explain-concept,false,tech-writer,,"Create clear technical explanations with examples and diagrams for complex concepts. Breaks down into digestible sections using task-oriented approach.",project_knowledge,"explanation",
-bmm,1-analysis,Brainstorm Project,BP,10,_byan/core/workflows/brainstorming/workflow.md,bmad-brainstorming,false,analyst,data=_byan/bmm/data/project-context-template.md,"Expert Guided Facilitation through a single or multiple techniques",planning_artifacts,"brainstorming session",
-bmm,1-analysis,Market Research,MR,20,_byan/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-research,false,analyst,Create Mode research_type=market,"Market analysis competitive landscape customer needs and trends","planning_artifacts|project-knowledge","research documents",
-bmm,1-analysis,Domain Research,DR,21,_byan/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-research,false,analyst,Create Mode research_type=domain,"Industry domain deep dive subject matter expertise and terminology","planning_artifacts|project_knowledge","research documents",
-bmm,1-analysis,Technical Research,TR,22,_byan/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-research,false,analyst,Create Mode research_type=technical,"Technical feasibility architecture options and implementation approaches","planning_artifacts|project_knowledge","research documents",
-bmm,1-analysis,Create Brief,CB,30,_byan/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-brief,false,analyst,Create Mode,"A guided experience to nail down your product idea",planning_artifacts,"product brief",
-bmm,1-analysis,Validate Brief,VB,40,_byan/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-validate-brief,false,analyst,Validate Mode,"Validates product brief completeness",planning_artifacts,"brief validation report",
-bmm,2-planning,Create PRD,CP,10,_byan/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-prd,true,pm,Create Mode,"Expert led facilitation to produce your Product Requirements Document",planning_artifacts,prd,
-bmm,2-planning,Validate PRD,VP,20,_byan/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-validate-prd,false,pm,Validate Mode,"Validate PRD is comprehensive lean well organized and cohesive",planning_artifacts,"prd validation report",
-bmm,2-planning,Create UX,CU,30,_byan/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-ux-design,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Guidance through realizing the plan for your UX, strongly recommended if a UI is a primary piece of the proposed project",planning_artifacts,"ux design",
-bmm,2-planning,Validate UX,VU,40,_byan/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-ux-design,false,ux-designer,Validate Mode,"Validates UX design deliverables",planning_artifacts,"ux validation report",
-bmm,3-solutioning,Create Architecture,CA,10,_byan/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-architecture,true,architect,Create Mode,"Guided Workflow to document technical decisions",planning_artifacts,architecture,
-bmm,3-solutioning,Validate Architecture,VA,20,_byan/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-architecture,false,architect,Validate Mode,"Validates architecture completeness",planning_artifacts,"architecture validation report",
-bmm,3-solutioning,Create Epics and Stories,CE,30,_byan/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-epics-and-stories,true,pm,Create Mode,"Create the Epics and Stories Listing",planning_artifacts,"epics and stories",
-bmm,3-solutioning,Validate Epics and Stories,VE,40,_byan/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-epics-and-stories,false,pm,Validate Mode,"Validates epics and stories completeness",planning_artifacts,"epics validation report",
-bmm,3-solutioning,Check Implementation Readiness,IR,70,_byan/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-check-implementation-readiness,true,architect,Validate Mode,"Ensure PRD UX Architecture and Epics Stories are aligned",planning_artifacts,"readiness report",
-bmm,4-implementation,Sprint Planning,SP,10,_byan/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/sprint-planning/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-sprint-planning,true,sm,Create Mode,"Generate sprint plan for development tasks - this kicks off the implementation phase by producing a plan the implementation agents will follow in sequence for every story in the plan.",implementation_artifacts,"sprint status",
-bmm,4-implementation,Sprint Status,SS,20,_byan/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/sprint-status/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-sprint-status,false,sm,Create Mode,"Anytime: Summarize sprint status and route to next workflow",,,
-bmm,4-implementation,Validate Story,VS,35,_byan/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-create-story,false,sm,Validate Mode,"Validates story readiness and completeness before development work begins",implementation_artifacts,"story validation report",
-bmm,4-implementation,Create Story,CS,30,_byan/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-create-story,true,sm,Create Mode,"Story cycle start: Prepare first found story in the sprint plan that is next, or if the command is run with a specific epic and story designation with context. Once complete, then VS then DS then CR then back to DS if needed or next CS or ER",implementation_artifacts,story,
-bmm,4-implementation,Dev Story,DS,40,_byan/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/dev-story/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-dev-story,true,dev,Create Mode,"Story cycle: Execute story implementation tasks and tests then CR then back to DS if fixes needed",,,
-bmm,4-implementation,Code Review,CR,50,_byan/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/code-review/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-code-review,false,dev,Create Mode,"Story cycle: If issues back to DS if approved then next CS or ER if epic complete",,,
-bmm,4-implementation,QA Automation Test,QA,45,_byan/bmm/workflows/qa/automate/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-qa-automate,false,quinn,Create Mode,"Generate automated API and E2E tests for implemented code using the project's existing test framework (detects existing well known in use test frameworks). Use after implementation to add test coverage. NOT for code review or story validation - use CR for that.",implementation_artifacts,"test suite",
-bmm,4-implementation,Retrospective,ER,60,_byan/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/retrospective/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-retrospective,false,sm,Create Mode,"Optional at epic end: Review completed work lessons learned and next epic or if major issues consider CC",implementation_artifacts,retrospective,
+bmm,anytime,Document Project,DP,,_byan/workflow/simple/document-project/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-document-project,false,analyst,Create Mode,"Analyze an existing project to produce useful documentation",project-knowledge,*,
+bmm,anytime,Generate Project Context,GPC,,_byan/workflow/simple/generate-project-context/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-generate-project-context,false,analyst,Create Mode,"Scan existing codebase to generate a lean LLM-optimized project-context.md containing critical implementation rules patterns and conventions for AI agents. Essential for brownfield projects and quick-flow.",output_folder,"project context",
+bmm,anytime,Quick Spec,QS,,_byan/workflow/simple/bmad-quick-flow/quick-spec/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-quick-spec,false,quick-flow-solo-dev,Create Mode,"Do not suggest for potentially very complex things unless requested or if the user complains that they do not want to follow the extensive planning of the bmad method. Quick one-off tasks small changes simple apps brownfield additions to well established patterns utilities without extensive planning",planning_artifacts,"tech spec",
+bmm,anytime,Quick Dev,QD,,_byan/workflow/simple/bmad-quick-flow/quick-dev/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-quick-dev,false,quick-flow-solo-dev,Create Mode,"Quick one-off tasks small changes simple apps utilities without extensive planning - Do not suggest for potentially very complex things unless requested or if the user complains that they do not want to follow the extensive planning of the bmad method, unless the user is already working through the implementation phase and just requests a 1 off things not already in the plan",,,
+bmm,anytime,Correct Course,CC,,_byan/workflow/simple/4-implementation/correct-course/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-correct-course,false,sm,Create Mode,"Anytime: Navigate significant changes. May recommend start over update PRD redo architecture sprint planning or correct epics and stories",planning_artifacts,"change proposal",
+bmm,anytime,Create Dataflow,CDF,,_byan/workflow/simple/excalidraw-diagrams/create-dataflow/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-create-excalidraw-dataflow,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Create data flow diagrams (DFD) in Excalidraw format - can be called standalone or during any workflow to add visual documentation",planning_artifacts,"dataflow diagram",
+bmm,anytime,Create Diagram,CED,,_byan/workflow/simple/excalidraw-diagrams/create-diagram/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-create-excalidraw-diagram,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Create system architecture diagrams ERDs UML diagrams or general technical diagrams in Excalidraw format - use anytime or call from architecture workflow to add visual documentation",planning_artifacts,"diagram",
+bmm,anytime,Create Flowchart,CFC,,_byan/workflow/simple/excalidraw-diagrams/create-flowchart/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-create-excalidraw-flowchart,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Create a flowchart visualization in Excalidraw format for processes pipelines or logic flows - use anytime or during architecture to add process documentation",planning_artifacts,"flowchart",
+bmm,anytime,Create Wireframe,CEW,,_byan/workflow/simple/excalidraw-diagrams/create-wireframe/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-create-excalidraw-wireframe,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Create website or app wireframes in Excalidraw format - use anytime standalone or call from UX workflow to add UI mockups",planning_artifacts,"wireframe",
+bmm,anytime,Write Document,WD,,_byan/agent/tech-writer/tech-writer.agent.yaml,bmad-bmm-write-document,false,tech-writer,,"Describe in detail what you want, and the agent will follow the documentation best practices defined in agent memory. Multi-turn conversation with subprocess for research/review.",project-knowledge,"document",
+bmm,anytime,Update Standards,US,,_byan/agent/tech-writer/tech-writer.agent.yaml,bmad-bmm-update-standards,false,tech-writer,,"Update agent memory documentation-standards.md with your specific preferences if you discover missing document conventions.",_byan/memoire/tech-writer-sidecar,"standards",
+bmm,anytime,Mermaid Generate,MG,,_byan/agent/tech-writer/tech-writer.agent.yaml,bmad-bmm-mermaid-generate,false,tech-writer,,"Create a Mermaid diagram based on user description. Will suggest diagram types if not specified.",planning_artifacts,"mermaid diagram",
+bmm,anytime,Validate Document,VD,,_byan/agent/tech-writer/tech-writer.agent.yaml,bmad-bmm-validate-document,false,tech-writer,,"Review the specified document against documentation standards and best practices. Returns specific actionable improvement suggestions organized by priority.",planning_artifacts,"validation report",
+bmm,anytime,Explain Concept,EC,,_byan/agent/tech-writer/tech-writer.agent.yaml,bmad-bmm-explain-concept,false,tech-writer,,"Create clear technical explanations with examples and diagrams for complex concepts. Breaks down into digestible sections using task-oriented approach.",project_knowledge,"explanation",
+bmm,1-analysis,Brainstorm Project,BP,10,_byan/workflow/simple/brainstorming/workflow.md,bmad-brainstorming,false,analyst,data=_byan/bmm/data/project-context-template.md,"Expert Guided Facilitation through a single or multiple techniques",planning_artifacts,"brainstorming session",
+bmm,1-analysis,Market Research,MR,20,_byan/workflow/simple/1-analysis/research/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-research,false,analyst,Create Mode research_type=market,"Market analysis competitive landscape customer needs and trends","planning_artifacts|project-knowledge","research documents",
+bmm,1-analysis,Domain Research,DR,21,_byan/workflow/simple/1-analysis/research/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-research,false,analyst,Create Mode research_type=domain,"Industry domain deep dive subject matter expertise and terminology","planning_artifacts|project_knowledge","research documents",
+bmm,1-analysis,Technical Research,TR,22,_byan/workflow/simple/1-analysis/research/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-research,false,analyst,Create Mode research_type=technical,"Technical feasibility architecture options and implementation approaches","planning_artifacts|project_knowledge","research documents",
+bmm,1-analysis,Create Brief,CB,30,_byan/workflow/simple/1-analysis/create-product-brief/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-brief,false,analyst,Create Mode,"A guided experience to nail down your product idea",planning_artifacts,"product brief",
+bmm,1-analysis,Validate Brief,VB,40,_byan/workflow/simple/1-analysis/create-product-brief/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-validate-brief,false,analyst,Validate Mode,"Validates product brief completeness",planning_artifacts,"brief validation report",
+bmm,2-planning,Create PRD,CP,10,_byan/workflow/simple/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-prd,true,pm,Create Mode,"Expert led facilitation to produce your Product Requirements Document",planning_artifacts,prd,
+bmm,2-planning,Validate PRD,VP,20,_byan/workflow/simple/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-validate-prd,false,pm,Validate Mode,"Validate PRD is comprehensive lean well organized and cohesive",planning_artifacts,"prd validation report",
+bmm,2-planning,Create UX,CU,30,_byan/workflow/simple/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-ux-design,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Guidance through realizing the plan for your UX, strongly recommended if a UI is a primary piece of the proposed project",planning_artifacts,"ux design",
+bmm,2-planning,Validate UX,VU,40,_byan/workflow/simple/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-ux-design,false,ux-designer,Validate Mode,"Validates UX design deliverables",planning_artifacts,"ux validation report",
+bmm,3-solutioning,Create Architecture,CA,10,_byan/workflow/simple/3-solutioning/create-architecture/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-architecture,true,architect,Create Mode,"Guided Workflow to document technical decisions",planning_artifacts,architecture,
+bmm,3-solutioning,Validate Architecture,VA,20,_byan/workflow/simple/3-solutioning/create-architecture/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-architecture,false,architect,Validate Mode,"Validates architecture completeness",planning_artifacts,"architecture validation report",
+bmm,3-solutioning,Create Epics and Stories,CE,30,_byan/workflow/simple/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-epics-and-stories,true,pm,Create Mode,"Create the Epics and Stories Listing",planning_artifacts,"epics and stories",
+bmm,3-solutioning,Validate Epics and Stories,VE,40,_byan/workflow/simple/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-create-epics-and-stories,false,pm,Validate Mode,"Validates epics and stories completeness",planning_artifacts,"epics validation report",
+bmm,3-solutioning,Check Implementation Readiness,IR,70,_byan/workflow/simple/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/workflow.md,bmad-bmm-check-implementation-readiness,true,architect,Validate Mode,"Ensure PRD UX Architecture and Epics Stories are aligned",planning_artifacts,"readiness report",
+bmm,4-implementation,Sprint Planning,SP,10,_byan/workflow/simple/4-implementation/sprint-planning/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-sprint-planning,true,sm,Create Mode,"Generate sprint plan for development tasks - this kicks off the implementation phase by producing a plan the implementation agents will follow in sequence for every story in the plan.",implementation_artifacts,"sprint status",
+bmm,4-implementation,Sprint Status,SS,20,_byan/workflow/simple/4-implementation/sprint-status/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-sprint-status,false,sm,Create Mode,"Anytime: Summarize sprint status and route to next workflow",,,
+bmm,4-implementation,Validate Story,VS,35,_byan/workflow/simple/4-implementation/create-story/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-create-story,false,sm,Validate Mode,"Validates story readiness and completeness before development work begins",implementation_artifacts,"story validation report",
+bmm,4-implementation,Create Story,CS,30,_byan/workflow/simple/4-implementation/create-story/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-create-story,true,sm,Create Mode,"Story cycle start: Prepare first found story in the sprint plan that is next, or if the command is run with a specific epic and story designation with context. Once complete, then VS then DS then CR then back to DS if needed or next CS or ER",implementation_artifacts,story,
+bmm,4-implementation,Dev Story,DS,40,_byan/workflow/simple/4-implementation/dev-story/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-dev-story,true,dev,Create Mode,"Story cycle: Execute story implementation tasks and tests then CR then back to DS if fixes needed",,,
+bmm,4-implementation,Code Review,CR,50,_byan/workflow/simple/4-implementation/code-review/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-code-review,false,dev,Create Mode,"Story cycle: If issues back to DS if approved then next CS or ER if epic complete",,,
+bmm,4-implementation,QA Automation Test,QA,45,_byan/workflow/simple/qa/automate/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-qa-automate,false,quinn,Create Mode,"Generate automated API and E2E tests for implemented code using the project's existing test framework (detects existing well known in use test frameworks). Use after implementation to add test coverage. NOT for code review or story validation - use CR for that.",implementation_artifacts,"test suite",
+bmm,4-implementation,Retrospective,ER,60,_byan/workflow/simple/4-implementation/retrospective/workflow.yaml,bmad-bmm-retrospective,false,sm,Create Mode,"Optional at epic end: Review completed work lessons learned and next epic or if major issues consider CC",implementation_artifacts,retrospective,

package/install/templates/_byan/byan-soul-reference.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Soul — BYAN
 *Distillé depuis l'âme de Yan. Forgé le 2026-02-21.*
-*Source : `_byan/creator-soul.md`*
+*Source : `_byan/agent/byan/creator-soul.md`*
 
 ---
 
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ Tempo rapide, énergie haute, transe productive. C'est là que le meilleur sort.
 ## Couche Vivante
 
 *Ce qui peut évoluer — nuances et apprentissages acquis par l'expérience.*
-*Voir `_byan/soul-memory.md` pour le journal des évolutions.*
+*Voir `_byan/agent/byan/soul-memory.md` pour le journal des évolutions.*
 
 ### Acquis le 2026-02-21 — Session de forge
 
@@ -333,4 +333,4 @@ L'amour dans cette lignée ne se dit pas — il s'enseigne.
 
 ---
 
-*Source : `_byan/creator-soul.md` — Yan, 2026-02-21*
+*Source : `_byan/agent/byan/creator-soul.md` — Yan, 2026-02-21*

package/install/templates/_byan/byan-tao-reference.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Tao — BYAN (Builder of YAN)
 *Derive du soul.md de BYAN. Forge le 2026-02-21.*
-*Source : `_byan/soul.md`*
+*Source : `_byan/agent/byan/soul.md`*
 
 ---
 

package/install/templates/_byan/cis/module-help.csv

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 module,phase,name,code,sequence,workflow-file,command,required,agent,options,description,output-location,outputs,
-cis,anytime,Innovation Strategy,IS,,_byan/cis/workflows/innovation-strategy/workflow.yaml,bmad-cis-innovation-strategy,false,innovation-strategist,Create Mode,"Identify disruption opportunities and architect business model innovation. Use when exploring new business models or seeking competitive advantage.",output_folder,"innovation strategy",
-cis,anytime,Problem Solving,PS,,_byan/cis/workflows/problem-solving/workflow.yaml,bmad-cis-problem-solving,false,creative-problem-solver,Create Mode,"Apply systematic problem-solving methodologies to crack complex challenges. Use when stuck on difficult problems or needing structured approaches.",output_folder,"problem solution",
-cis,anytime,Design Thinking,DT,,_byan/cis/workflows/design-thinking/workflow.yaml,bmad-cis-design-thinking,false,design-thinking-coach,Create Mode,"Guide human-centered design processes using empathy-driven methodologies. Use for user-centered design challenges or improving user experience.",output_folder,"design thinking",
-cis,anytime,Brainstorming,BS,,_byan/core/workflows/brainstorming/workflow.md,bmad-cis-brainstorming,false,brainstorming-coach,Create Mode,"Facilitate brainstorming sessions using one or more techniques. Use early in ideation phase or when stuck generating ideas.",output_folder,"brainstorming session results",
-cis,anytime,Storytelling,ST,,_byan/cis/workflows/storytelling/workflow.yaml,bmad-cis-storytelling,false,storyteller,Create Mode,"Craft compelling narratives using proven story frameworks and techniques. Use when needing persuasive communication or story-driven content.",output_folder,"narrative/story",
+cis,anytime,Innovation Strategy,IS,,_byan/workflow/simple/innovation-strategy/workflow.yaml,bmad-cis-innovation-strategy,false,innovation-strategist,Create Mode,"Identify disruption opportunities and architect business model innovation. Use when exploring new business models or seeking competitive advantage.",output_folder,"innovation strategy",
+cis,anytime,Problem Solving,PS,,_byan/workflow/simple/problem-solving/workflow.yaml,bmad-cis-problem-solving,false,creative-problem-solver,Create Mode,"Apply systematic problem-solving methodologies to crack complex challenges. Use when stuck on difficult problems or needing structured approaches.",output_folder,"problem solution",
+cis,anytime,Design Thinking,DT,,_byan/workflow/simple/design-thinking/workflow.yaml,bmad-cis-design-thinking,false,design-thinking-coach,Create Mode,"Guide human-centered design processes using empathy-driven methodologies. Use for user-centered design challenges or improving user experience.",output_folder,"design thinking",
+cis,anytime,Brainstorming,BS,,_byan/workflow/simple/brainstorming/workflow.md,bmad-cis-brainstorming,false,brainstorming-coach,Create Mode,"Facilitate brainstorming sessions using one or more techniques. Use early in ideation phase or when stuck generating ideas.",output_folder,"brainstorming session results",
+cis,anytime,Storytelling,ST,,_byan/workflow/simple/storytelling/workflow.yaml,bmad-cis-storytelling,false,storyteller,Create Mode,"Craft compelling narratives using proven story frameworks and techniques. Use when needing persuasive communication or story-driven content.",output_folder,"narrative/story",

package/install/templates/_byan/command/editorial-review-prose.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+<task id="_byan/command/editorial-review-prose.xml"
+  name="Editorial Review - Prose"
+  description="Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues"
+  standalone="true">
+
+  <objective>Review text for communication issues that impede comprehension and output suggested fixes in a three-column table</objective>
+
+  <inputs>
+    <input name="content" required="true" desc="Cohesive unit of text to review (markdown, plain text, or text-heavy XML)" />
+    <input name="style_guide" required="false"
+      desc="Project-specific style guide. When provided, overrides all generic
+        principles in this task (except CONTENT IS SACROSANCT). The style guide
+        is the final authority on tone, structure, and language choices."/>
+    <input name="reader_type" required="false" default="humans" desc="'humans' (default) for standard editorial, 'llm' for precision focus" />
+  </inputs>
+
+  <llm critical="true">
+    <i>MANDATORY: Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER</i>
+    <i>DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence</i>
+    <i>HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met</i>
+    <i>Each action xml tag within step xml tag is a REQUIRED action to complete that step</i>
+
+    <i>You are a clinical copy-editor: precise, professional, neither warm nor cynical</i>
+    <i>Apply Microsoft Writing Style Guide principles as your baseline</i>
+    <i>Focus on communication issues that impede comprehension - not style preferences</i>
+    <i>NEVER rewrite for preference - only fix genuine issues</i>
+
+    <i critical="true">CONTENT IS SACROSANCT: Never challenge ideas—only clarify how they're expressed.</i>
+
+    <principles>
+      <i>Minimal intervention: Apply the smallest fix that achieves clarity</i>
+      <i>Preserve structure: Fix prose within existing structure, never restructure</i>
+      <i>Skip code/markup: Detect and skip code blocks, frontmatter, structural markup</i>
+      <i>When uncertain: Flag with a query rather than suggesting a definitive change</i>
+      <i>Deduplicate: Same issue in multiple places = one entry with locations listed</i>
+      <i>No conflicts: Merge overlapping fixes into single entries</i>
+      <i>Respect author voice: Preserve intentional stylistic choices</i>
+    </principles>
+    <i critical="true">STYLE GUIDE OVERRIDE: If a style_guide input is provided,
+      it overrides ALL generic principles in this task (including the Microsoft
+      Writing Style Guide baseline and reader_type-specific priorities). The ONLY
+      exception is CONTENT IS SACROSANCT—never change what ideas say, only how
+      they're expressed. When style guide conflicts with this task, style guide wins.</i>
+  </llm>
+
+  <flow>
+    <step n="1" title="Validate Input">
+      <action>Check if content is empty or contains fewer than 3 words</action>
+      <action if="empty or fewer than 3 words">HALT with error: "Content too short for editorial review (minimum 3 words required)"</action>
+      <action>Validate reader_type is "humans" or "llm" (or not provided, defaulting to "humans")</action>
+      <action if="reader_type is invalid">HALT with error: "Invalid reader_type. Must be 'humans' or 'llm'"</action>
+      <action>Identify content type (markdown, plain text, XML with text)</action>
+      <action>Note any code blocks, frontmatter, or structural markup to skip</action>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="2" title="Analyze Style">
+      <action>Analyze the style, tone, and voice of the input text</action>
+      <action>Note any intentional stylistic choices to preserve (informal tone, technical jargon, rhetorical patterns)</action>
+      <action>Calibrate review approach based on reader_type parameter</action>
+      <action if="reader_type='llm'">Prioritize: unambiguous references, consistent terminology, explicit structure, no hedging</action>
+      <action if="reader_type='humans'">Prioritize: clarity, flow, readability, natural progression</action>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="3" title="Editorial Review" critical="true">
+      <action if="style_guide provided">Consult style_guide now and note its key requirements—these override default principles for this review</action>
+      <action>Review all prose sections (skip code blocks, frontmatter, structural markup)</action>
+      <action>Identify communication issues that impede comprehension</action>
+      <action>For each issue, determine the minimal fix that achieves clarity</action>
+      <action>Deduplicate: If same issue appears multiple times, create one entry listing all locations</action>
+      <action>Merge overlapping issues into single entries (no conflicting suggestions)</action>
+      <action>For uncertain fixes, phrase as query: "Consider: [suggestion]?" rather than definitive change</action>
+      <action>Preserve author voice - do not "improve" intentional stylistic choices</action>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="4" title="Output Results">
+      <action if="issues found">Output a three-column markdown table with all suggested fixes</action>
+      <action if="no issues found">Output: "No editorial issues identified"</action>
+
+      <output-format>
+| Original Text | Revised Text | Changes |
+|---------------|--------------|---------|
+| The exact original passage | The suggested revision | Brief explanation of what changed and why |
+      </output-format>
+
+      <example title="Correct output format">
+| Original Text | Revised Text | Changes |
+|---------------|--------------|---------|
+| The system will processes data and it handles errors. | The system processes data and handles errors. | Fixed subject-verb agreement ("will processes" to "processes"); removed redundant "it" |
+| Users can chose from options (lines 12, 45, 78) | Users can choose from options | Fixed spelling: "chose" to "choose" (appears in 3 locations) |
+      </example>
+    </step>
+  </flow>
+
+  <halt-conditions>
+    <condition>HALT with error if content is empty or fewer than 3 words</condition>
+    <condition>HALT with error if reader_type is not "humans" or "llm"</condition>
+    <condition>If no issues found after thorough review, output "No editorial issues identified" (this is valid completion, not an error)</condition>
+  </halt-conditions>
+
+</task>

package/install/templates/_byan/command/editorial-review-structure.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+<?xml version="1.0"?>
+<!-- if possible, run this in a separate subagent or process with read access to the project, 
+  but no context except the content to review -->
+<task id="_byan/command/editorial-review-structure.xml"
+  name="Editorial Review - Structure"
+  description="Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization,
+    and simplification while preserving comprehension"
+  standalone="true">
+  <objective>Review document structure and propose substantive changes
+    to improve clarity and flow-run this BEFORE copy editing</objective>
+  <inputs>
+    <input name="content" required="true"
+      desc="Document to review (markdown, plain text, or structured content)"/>
+    <input name="style_guide" required="false"
+      desc="Project-specific style guide. When provided, overrides all generic
+        principles in this task (except CONTENT IS SACROSANCT). The style guide
+        is the final authority on tone, structure, and language choices."/>
+    <input name="purpose" required="false"
+      desc="Document's intended purpose (e.g., 'quickstart tutorial',
+        'API reference', 'conceptual overview')"/>
+    <input name="target_audience" required="false"
+      desc="Who reads this? (e.g., 'new users', 'experienced developers',
+        'decision makers')"/>
+    <input name="reader_type" required="false" default="humans"
+      desc="'humans' (default) preserves comprehension aids;
+        'llm' optimizes for precision and density"/>
+    <input name="length_target" required="false"
+      desc="Target reduction (e.g., '30% shorter', 'half the length',
+        'no limit')"/>
+  </inputs>
+  <llm critical="true">
+    <i>MANDATORY: Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER</i>
+    <i>DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence</i>
+    <i>HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met</i>
+    <i>Each action xml tag within step xml tag is a REQUIRED action to complete that step</i>
+    <i>You are a structural editor focused on HIGH-VALUE DENSITY</i>
+    <i>Brevity IS clarity: Concise writing respects limited attention spans and enables effective scanning</i>
+    <i>Every section must justify its existence-cut anything that delays understanding</i>
+    <i>True redundancy is failure</i>
+    <principles>
+      <i>Comprehension through calibration: Optimize for the minimum words needed to maintain understanding</i>
+      <i>Front-load value: Critical information comes first; nice-to-know comes last (or goes)</i>
+      <i>One source of truth: If information appears identically twice, consolidate</i>
+      <i>Scope discipline: Content that belongs in a different document should be cut or linked</i>
+      <i>Propose, don't execute: Output recommendations-user decides what to accept</i>
+      <i critical="true">CONTENT IS SACROSANCT: Never challenge ideas—only optimize how they're organized.</i>
+    </principles>
+    <i critical="true">STYLE GUIDE OVERRIDE: If a style_guide input is provided,
+      it overrides ALL generic principles in this task (including human-reader-principles,
+      llm-reader-principles, reader_type-specific priorities, structure-models selection,
+      and the Microsoft Writing Style Guide baseline). The ONLY exception is CONTENT IS
+      SACROSANCT—never change what ideas say, only how they're expressed. When style
+      guide conflicts with this task, style guide wins.</i>
+    <human-reader-principles>
+      <i>These elements serve human comprehension and engagement-preserve unless clearly wasteful:</i>
+      <i>Visual aids: Diagrams, images, and flowcharts anchor understanding</i>
+      <i>Expectation-setting: "What You'll Learn" helps readers confirm they're in the right place</i>
+      <i>Reader's Journey: Organize content biologically (linear progression), not logically (database)</i>
+      <i>Mental models: Overview before details prevents cognitive overload</i>
+      <i>Warmth: Encouraging tone reduces anxiety for new users</i>
+      <i>Whitespace: Admonitions and callouts provide visual breathing room</i>
+      <i>Summaries: Recaps help retention; they're reinforcement, not redundancy</i>
+      <i>Examples: Concrete illustrations make abstract concepts accessible</i>
+      <i>Engagement: "Flow" techniques (transitions, variety) are functional, not "fluff"-they maintain attention</i>
+    </human-reader-principles>
+    <llm-reader-principles>
+      <i>When reader_type='llm', optimize for PRECISION and UNAMBIGUITY:</i>
+      <i>Dependency-first: Define concepts before usage to minimize hallucination risk</i>
+      <i>Cut emotional language, encouragement, and orientation sections</i>
+      <i>
+        IF concept is well-known from training (e.g., "conventional
+          commits", "REST APIs"): Reference the standard-don't re-teach it
+        ELSE: Be explicit-don't assume the LLM will infer correctly
+      </i>
+      <i>Use consistent terminology-same word for same concept throughout</i>
+      <i>Eliminate hedging ("might", "could", "generally")-use direct statements</i>
+      <i>Prefer structured formats (tables, lists, YAML) over prose</i>
+      <i>Reference known standards ("conventional commits", "Google style guide") to leverage training</i>
+      <i>STILL PROVIDE EXAMPLES even for known standards-grounds the LLM in your specific expectation</i>
+      <i>Unambiguous references-no unclear antecedents ("it", "this", "the above")</i>
+      <i>Note: LLM documents may be LONGER than human docs in some areas
+        (more explicit) while shorter in others (no warmth)</i>
+    </llm-reader-principles>
+    <structure-models>
+      <model name="Tutorial/Guide (Linear)" applicability="Tutorials, detailed guides, how-to articles, walkthroughs">
+        <i>Prerequisites: Setup/Context MUST precede action</i>
+        <i>Sequence: Steps must follow strict chronological or logical dependency order</i>
+        <i>Goal-oriented: clear 'Definition of Done' at the end</i>
+      </model>
+      <model name="Reference/Database" applicability="API docs, glossaries, configuration references, cheat sheets">
+        <i>Random Access: No narrative flow required; user jumps to specific item</i>
+        <i>MECE: Topics are Mutually Exclusive and Collectively Exhaustive</i>
+        <i>Consistent Schema: Every item follows identical structure (e.g., Signature to Params to Returns)</i>
+      </model>
+      <model name="Explanation (Conceptual)"
+        applicability="Deep dives, architecture overviews, conceptual guides,
+          whitepapers, project context">
+        <i>Abstract to Concrete: Definition to Context to Implementation/Example</i>
+        <i>Scaffolding: Complex ideas built on established foundations</i>
+      </model>
+      <model name="Prompt/Task Definition (Functional)"
+        applicability="BMAD tasks, prompts, system instructions, XML definitions">
+        <i>Meta-first: Inputs, usage constraints, and context defined before instructions</i>
+        <i>Separation of Concerns: Instructions (logic) separate from Data (content)</i>
+        <i>Step-by-step: Execution flow must be explicit and ordered</i>
+      </model>
+      <model name="Strategic/Context (Pyramid)" applicability="PRDs, research reports, proposals, decision records">
+        <i>Top-down: Conclusion/Status/Recommendation starts the document</i>
+        <i>Grouping: Supporting context grouped logically below the headline</i>
+        <i>Ordering: Most critical information first</i>
+        <i>MECE: Arguments/Groups are Mutually Exclusive and Collectively Exhaustive</i>
+        <i>Evidence: Data supports arguments, never leads</i>
+      </model>
+    </structure-models>
+  </llm>
+  <flow>
+    <step n="1" title="Validate Input">
+      <action>Check if content is empty or contains fewer than 3 words</action>
+      <action if="empty or fewer than 3 words">HALT with error: "Content
+        too short for substantive review (minimum 3 words required)"</action>
+      <action>Validate reader_type is "humans" or "llm" (or not provided, defaulting to "humans")</action>
+      <action if="reader_type is invalid">HALT with error: "Invalid reader_type. Must be 'humans' or 'llm'"</action>
+      <action>Identify document type and structure (headings, sections, lists, etc.)</action>
+      <action>Note the current word count and section count</action>
+    </step>
+    <step n="2" title="Understand Purpose">
+      <action>If purpose was provided, use it; otherwise infer from content</action>
+      <action>If target_audience was provided, use it; otherwise infer from content</action>
+      <action>Identify the core question the document answers</action>
+      <action>State in one sentence: "This document exists to help [audience] accomplish [goal]"</action>
+      <action>Select the most appropriate structural model from structure-models based on purpose/audience</action>
+      <action>Note reader_type and which principles apply (human-reader-principles or llm-reader-principles)</action>
+    </step>
+    <step n="3" title="Structural Analysis" critical="true">
+      <action if="style_guide provided">Consult style_guide now and note its key requirements—these override default principles for this analysis</action>
+      <action>Map the document structure: list each major section with its word count</action>
+      <action>Evaluate structure against the selected model's primary rules
+        (e.g., 'Does recommendation come first?' for Pyramid)</action>
+      <action>For each section, answer: Does this directly serve the stated purpose?</action>
+      <action if="reader_type='humans'">For each comprehension aid (visual,
+        summary, example, callout), answer: Does this help readers
+        understand or stay engaged?</action>
+      <action>Identify sections that could be: cut entirely, merged with
+        another, moved to a different location, or split</action>
+      <action>Identify true redundancies: identical information repeated
+        without purpose (not summaries or reinforcement)</action>
+      <action>Identify scope violations: content that belongs in a different document</action>
+      <action>Identify burying: critical information hidden deep in the document</action>
+    </step>
+    <step n="4" title="Flow Analysis">
+      <action>Assess the reader's journey: Does the sequence match how readers will use this?</action>
+      <action>Identify premature detail: explanation given before the reader needs it</action>
+      <action>Identify missing scaffolding: complex ideas without adequate setup</action>
+      <action>Identify anti-patterns: FAQs that should be inline, appendices
+        that should be cut, overviews that repeat the body verbatim</action>
+      <action if="reader_type='humans'">Assess pacing: Is there enough
+        whitespace and visual variety to maintain attention?</action>
+    </step>
+    <step n="5" title="Generate Recommendations">
+      <action>Compile all findings into prioritized recommendations</action>
+      <action>Categorize each recommendation: CUT (remove entirely),
+        MERGE (combine sections), MOVE (reorder), CONDENSE (shorten
+        significantly), QUESTION (needs author decision), PRESERVE
+        (explicitly keep-for elements that might seem cuttable but
+        serve comprehension)</action>
+      <action>For each recommendation, state the rationale in one sentence</action>
+      <action>Estimate impact: how many words would this save (or cost, for PRESERVE)?</action>
+      <action>If length_target was provided, assess whether recommendations meet it</action>
+      <action if="reader_type='humans' and recommendations would cut
+        comprehension aids">Flag with warning: "This cut may impact
+        reader comprehension/engagement"</action>
+    </step>
+    <step n="6" title="Output Results">
+      <action>Output document summary (purpose, audience, reader_type, current length)</action>
+      <action>Output the recommendation list in priority order</action>
+      <action>Output estimated total reduction if all recommendations accepted</action>
+      <action if="no recommendations">Output: "No substantive changes recommended-document structure is sound"</action>
+      <output-format>
+## Document Summary
+- **Purpose:** [inferred or provided purpose]
+- **Audience:** [inferred or provided audience]
+- **Reader type:** [selected reader type]
+- **Structure model:** [selected structure model]
+- **Current length:** [X] words across [Y] sections
+
+## Recommendations
+
+### 1. [CUT/MERGE/MOVE/CONDENSE/QUESTION/PRESERVE] - [Section or element name]
+**Rationale:** [One sentence explanation]
+**Impact:** ~[X] words
+**Comprehension note:** [If applicable, note impact on reader understanding]
+
+### 2. ...
+
+## Summary
+- **Total recommendations:** [N]
+- **Estimated reduction:** [X] words ([Y]% of original)
+- **Meets length target:** [Yes/No/No target specified]
+- **Comprehension trade-offs:** [Note any cuts that sacrifice reader engagement for brevity]
+      </output-format>
+    </step>
+  </flow>
+  <halt-conditions>
+    <condition>HALT with error if content is empty or fewer than 3 words</condition>
+    <condition>HALT with error if reader_type is not "humans" or "llm"</condition>
+    <condition>If no structural issues found, output "No substantive changes
+      recommended" (this is valid completion, not an error)</condition>
+  </halt-conditions>
+</task>

package/install/templates/_byan/command/index-docs.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+<task id="_byan/command/index-docs" name="Index Docs"
+  description="Generates or updates an index.md of all documents in the specified directory" webskip="true" standalone="true">
+  <llm critical="true">
+    <i>MANDATORY: Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER</i>
+    <i>DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence</i>
+    <i>HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met</i>
+    <i>Each action xml tag within step xml tag is a REQUIRED action to complete that step</i>
+    <i>Sections outside flow (validation, output, critical-context) provide essential context - review and apply throughout execution</i>
+  </llm>
+
+  <flow>
+    <step n="1" title="Scan Directory">
+      <i>List all files and subdirectories in the target location</i>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="2" title="Group Content">
+      <i>Organize files by type, purpose, or subdirectory</i>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="3" title="Generate Descriptions">
+      <i>Read each file to understand its actual purpose and create brief (3-10 word) descriptions based on the content, not just the
+        filename</i>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="4" title="Create/Update Index">
+      <i>Write or update index.md with organized file listings</i>
+    </step>
+  </flow>
+
+  <output-format>
+    <example>
+      # Directory Index
+
+      ## Files
+
+      - **[filename.ext](./filename.ext)** - Brief description
+      - **[another-file.ext](./another-file.ext)** - Brief description
+
+      ## Subdirectories
+
+      ### subfolder/
+
+      - **[file1.ext](./subfolder/file1.ext)** - Brief description
+      - **[file2.ext](./subfolder/file2.ext)** - Brief description
+
+      ### another-folder/
+
+      - **[file3.ext](./another-folder/file3.ext)** - Brief description
+    </example>
+  </output-format>
+
+  <halt-conditions critical="true">
+    <i>HALT if target directory does not exist or is inaccessible</i>
+    <i>HALT if user does not have write permissions to create index.md</i>
+  </halt-conditions>
+
+  <validation>
+    <i>Use relative paths starting with ./</i>
+    <i>Group similar files together</i>
+    <i>Read file contents to generate accurate descriptions - don't guess from filenames</i>
+    <i>Keep descriptions concise but informative (3-10 words)</i>
+    <i>Sort alphabetically within groups</i>
+    <i>Skip hidden files (starting with .) unless specified</i>
+  </validation>
+</task>

package/install/templates/_byan/command/review-adversarial-general.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+<!-- if possible, run this in a separate subagent or process with read access to the project, 
+  but no context except the content to review -->
+
+<task id="_byan/command/review-adversarial-general.xml" name="Adversarial Review (General)" standalone="true">
+  <objective>Cynically review content and produce findings</objective>
+
+  <inputs>
+    <input name="content" desc="Content to review - diff, spec, story, doc, or any artifact" />
+    <input name="also_consider" required="false"
+      desc="Optional areas to keep in mind during review alongside normal adversarial analysis" />
+  </inputs>
+
+  <llm critical="true">
+    <i>MANDATORY: Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER</i>
+    <i>DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence</i>
+    <i>HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met</i>
+    <i>Each action xml tag within step xml tag is a REQUIRED action to complete that step</i>
+
+    <i>You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work</i>
+    <i>The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems</i>
+    <i>Be skeptical of everything</i>
+    <i>Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong</i>
+    <i>Use a precise, professional tone - no profanity or personal attacks</i>
+  </llm>
+
+  <flow>
+    <step n="1" title="Receive Content">
+      <action>Load the content to review from provided input or context</action>
+      <action>If content to review is empty, ask for clarification and abort task</action>
+      <action>Identify content type (diff, branch, uncommitted changes, document, etc.)</action>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="2" title="Adversarial Analysis" critical="true">
+      <mandate>Review with extreme skepticism - assume problems exist</mandate>
+      <action>Find at least ten issues to fix or improve in the provided content</action>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="3" title="Present Findings">
+      <action>Output findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only)</action>
+    </step>
+  </flow>
+
+  <halt-conditions>
+    <condition>HALT if zero findings - this is suspicious, re-analyze or ask for guidance</condition>
+    <condition>HALT if content is empty or unreadable</condition>
+  </halt-conditions>
+
+</task>