create-ailk 0.24.0 → 0.25.1

package/templates/apps/api/src/routes/project-listings/__tests__/structured-address.test.ts

@@ -1,535 +0,0 @@
-// Not marked oss: false (D-48/#5366 escalation) — tests the
-// always-shipping project-listings anonymous surface; see
-// routes/project-listings/me.ts's header comment.
-/**
- * @file structured-address.test.ts
- *
- * THE ACCEPTANCE GATE for the structured founder address (#5279).
- *
- * The application collected a whole business address in ONE free-text box.
- * It now renders a fieldset, and the payload field `address` became a UNION:
- * the legacy display STRING or the structured PARTS. The row keeps `address`
- * as the single-line DISPLAY string and gains six nullable part columns
- * beside it, which the server writes — and composes the display line from —
- * in `draftUpdateData`.
- *
- * Two properties carry this change, and both look fine when broken, which is
- * why they each get a test that fails when they are:
- *
- *   1. The parts arrive as PARTS. A patch carrying the structured object must
- *      land six DISTINCT column values, not one concatenated string in
- *      `address` with the columns left null. A service that quietly stringified
- *      the object would produce a row that reads correctly on the listing page
- *      and has silently thrown away the split the fieldset exists to capture.
- *
- *   2. A legacy free-text address round-trips CHARACTER-FOR-CHARACTER with its
- *      parts null. Nothing may ever split an existing `address` into parts:
- *      address parsing guesses, and a wrong guess silently corrupts the party
- *      identification the listing's privacy notice points at (#5036 D6), with
- *      nothing on the row to mark it as invented. A null part is honest; a
- *      guessed one is not.
- *
- * Same harness as `configured-application.test.ts` and `drafts.test.ts`: real
- * routes, real services, mocked `lib/prisma.js` over a small in-memory row
- * store, `routeLead` running for real against a per-test temp path.
- */
-
-// eslint-disable-next-line no-restricted-syntax -- prisma is a DB boundary; __mocks__/prisma.ts activates the auto-mock
-jest.mock("../../../lib/prisma.js");
-
-jest.mock("@working-theory/email", () => ({
-  sendLeadNotification: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ ok: true, messageId: "msg-test" }),
-  // #5406 — `start` now reaches the resume email. Declared here for the reason
-  // docs/lessons/project-listings/04 records: a mock factory that omits an
-  // export the code under test calls leaves it `undefined` at the callsite.
-  // These suites configure no `resumeEmail`, so the send short-circuits before
-  // this is reached; it is declared so a future fixture that DOES configure
-  // one fails on its assertion rather than on a missing mock.
-  sendListingResumeEmail: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ ok: true, messageId: "msg-resume" }),
-}));
-
-jest.mock("@working-theory/license", () => ({
-  checkLicense: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({
-    tier: "free",
-    plan: null,
-    features: [],
-    expiresAt: null,
-    revoked: false,
-  }),
-}));
-
-import Fastify from "fastify";
-import type { FastifyInstance } from "fastify";
-
-import { setupLeadFileEnv } from "../../../__tests__/factories/lead-fixture";
-import {
-  mockNoWorkspace,
-  mockWorkspaceExists,
-} from "../../../lib/__mocks__/prisma.js";
-import { prisma } from "../../../lib/prisma.js";
-import { patchProjectListingDraftRoute } from "../patch-draft.js";
-import { startProjectListingRoute } from "../start.js";
-import { submitProjectListingRoute } from "../submit.js";
-
-// ─── Fixtures ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-const SITE_ID = "site-1";
-const SITE_KEY = "pk-site-1";
-
-const opt = (value: string, label: string) => ({ value, label });
-
-const VALID_QUESTIONS = {
-  q2: {
-    prompt: "Why are you here?",
-    options: [opt("scale", "Scaling my team"), opt("just-curious", "Just curious")],
-  },
-  q3: { prompt: "Stage?", options: [opt("a", "A"), opt("b", "B"), opt("c", "C")] },
-  q4: { prompt: "Team size?", options: [opt("a", "A"), opt("b", "B"), opt("c", "C")] },
-  q5: {
-    prompt: "Urgency?",
-    options: [opt("urgent", "Now"), opt("planning", "Soon"), opt("exploring", "Someday")],
-  },
-  q6: {
-    prompt: "Pain?",
-    options: [
-      opt("low", "Low"),
-      opt("medium", "Medium"),
-      opt("high", "High"),
-      opt("critical", "Critical"),
-    ],
-  },
-  q7: { prompt: "Anything else?" },
-  extras: [],
-};
-
-const START_PAYLOAD = {
-  siteKey: SITE_KEY,
-  founderName: "Ada Founder",
-  founderEmail: "ada@example.com",
-  consent: true,
-};
-
-/** Everything the ten steps after step one collect, minus the address. */
-const APPLICATION_WITHOUT_ADDRESS = {
-  name: "My Project",
-  headline: "Ten words or fewer for the tile title here",
-  oneLiner: "A short sentence describing what the project does for its people.",
-  problem: "The problem is real and this describes it.",
-  product: "wireframes",
-  commitment: "part-time",
-  teamComposition: "co-founders",
-  faqs: [
-    { question: "Q one?", answer: "A one." },
-    { question: "Q two?", answer: "A two." },
-    { question: "Q three?", answer: "A three." },
-  ],
-  questions: VALID_QUESTIONS,
-};
-
-/** What `AddressFieldset` posts — six controls under six fixed keys. */
-const ADDRESS_PARTS = {
-  addressLine1: "221B Baker Street",
-  addressLine2: "Flat B",
-  city: "London",
-  region: "Greater London",
-  postalCode: "NW1 6XE",
-  country: "GB",
-};
-
-/**
- * The display line the SERVER must compose from `ADDRESS_PARTS` — the parts
- * in reading order, joined with ", ". Written out literally rather than by
- * calling `composeAddressLine`, so a change to the joiner fails this test
- * instead of travelling through it.
- */
-const COMPOSED_ADDRESS_LINE =
-  "221B Baker Street, Flat B, London, Greater London, NW1 6XE, GB";
-
-/**
- * An address a founder typed into the ONE free-text box, before #5279. It is
- * not in the composed order, its parts are not separable by any rule, and
- * nothing may ever try: it is here to be returned unchanged.
- */
-const LEGACY_ADDRESS_LINE =
-  "221B Baker Street, Marylebone, London NW1 6XE, United Kingdom";
-
-// ─── The in-memory row store the Prisma mock is backed by ───────────────────
-
-type Row = Record<string, unknown>;
-
-let rows: Row[];
-let nextId: number;
-
-function matches(row: Row, where: Record<string, unknown>): boolean {
-  return Object.entries(where).every(([key, value]) => {
-    if (key === "OR") {
-      return (value as Record<string, unknown>[]).some((clause) => matches(row, clause));
-    }
-    if (value !== null && typeof value === "object" && !(value instanceof Date)) {
-      const clause = value as Record<string, unknown>;
-      if ("in" in clause) return (clause["in"] as unknown[]).includes(row[key]);
-      if ("not" in clause) return row[key] !== clause["not"];
-      if ("gt" in clause) return (row[key] as Date) > (clause["gt"] as Date);
-      if ("startsWith" in clause) {
-        return (
-          typeof row[key] === "string" &&
-          (row[key] as string).startsWith(clause["startsWith"] as string)
-        );
-      }
-    }
-    return row[key] === value;
-  });
-}
-
-function installStore(): void {
-  // #6335 — the shared prisma mock no longer resolves ANY requested
-  // workspace id. `startProjectListingDraft` stamps the row's `workspaceId`
-  // by resolving the site it was filed against (`resolveWorkspaceIdForSite`,
-  // services/project-listings.ts), so this suite states the ONE site it is
-  // built around. Keyed on the requested id — nothing else resolves.
-  mockWorkspaceExists(prisma, SITE_ID);
-
-  rows = [];
-  nextId = 1;
-
-  (prisma.lead.create as jest.Mock).mockImplementation(() =>
-    Promise.resolve({ id: `lead_00000000-0000-7000-8000-00000000000${nextId}` }),
-  );
-
-  (prisma.siteListingConfig.findUnique as jest.Mock).mockImplementation(
-    ({ where }: { where: { siteId?: string; publicKey?: string } }) => {
-      if (where.publicKey !== undefined) {
-        return Promise.resolve(where.publicKey === SITE_KEY ? { siteId: SITE_ID } : null);
-      }
-      // No config row — the platform defaults, which collect `address`.
-      return Promise.resolve(null);
-    },
-  );
-
-  // #5275 — the grant write `start` makes after the row. Append-only; it only
-  // needs to resolve here (drafts.test.ts asserts on what it is called with).
-  (prisma.consentGrant.createMany as jest.Mock).mockImplementation(
-    ({ data }: { data: Row[] }) => Promise.resolve({ count: data.length }),
-  );
-
-  // #5275 — `start` writes the row and its grant in one interactive
-  // transaction; the mock hands the same store-backed client through.
-  (prisma.$transaction as jest.Mock).mockImplementation(
-    async (fn: (tx: typeof prisma) => Promise<unknown>) => fn(prisma),
-  );
-
-  (prisma.projectListing.create as jest.Mock).mockImplementation(({ data }: { data: Row }) => {
-    const now = new Date();
-    const row: Row = {
-      id: `prjl_00000000-0000-7000-8000-00000000000${nextId++}`,
-      slug: null,
-      name: null,
-      oneLiner: null,
-      problem: null,
-      url: null,
-      product: null,
-      commitment: null,
-      teamComposition: null,
-      faqs: null,
-      anythingElse: null,
-      address: null,
-      // #5279 — a freshly-started draft has no parts, exactly like every row
-      // written before the columns existed.
-      addressLine1: null,
-      addressLine2: null,
-      addressCity: null,
-      addressRegion: null,
-      addressPostalCode: null,
-      addressCountry: null,
-      questions: null,
-      // #5407 — a row written before the columns existed, and a freshly
-      // started draft on a site that asks for one name line: parts null,
-      // no phone, no verification stamp.
-      founderFirstName: null,
-      founderLastName: null,
-      founderPhone: null,
-      emailVerifiedAt: null,
-      founderCompany: null,
-      leadId: null,
-      headline: null,
-      logoMarkUrl: null,
-      logoWordmarkUrl: null,
-      solution: null,
-      featured: false,
-      decidedAt: null,
-      decidedBy: null,
-      issueUrl: null,
-      experimentKey: null,
-      windowEndsAt: null,
-      createdAt: now,
-      updatedAt: now,
-      ...data,
-    };
-    rows.push(row);
-    return Promise.resolve(row);
-  });
-
-  (prisma.projectListing.findFirst as jest.Mock).mockImplementation(
-    ({ where }: { where: Record<string, unknown> }) =>
-      Promise.resolve(rows.find((row) => matches(row, where)) ?? null),
-  );
-
-  (prisma.projectListing.findMany as jest.Mock).mockImplementation(
-    ({ where }: { where: Record<string, unknown> }) =>
-      Promise.resolve(rows.filter((row) => matches(row, where))),
-  );
-
-  (prisma.projectListing.update as jest.Mock).mockImplementation(
-    ({ where, data }: { where: Record<string, unknown>; data: Row }) => {
-      const row = rows.find((r) => matches(r, where));
-      Object.assign(row!, data, { updatedAt: new Date() });
-      return Promise.resolve(row);
-    },
-  );
-
-  (prisma.projectListing.updateMany as jest.Mock).mockImplementation(
-    ({ where, data }: { where: Record<string, unknown>; data: Row }) => {
-      const matched = rows.filter((r) => matches(r, where));
-      matched.forEach((r) => Object.assign(r, data, { updatedAt: new Date() }));
-      return Promise.resolve({ count: matched.length });
-    },
-  );
-}
-
-// ─── Helpers ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-const bearer = (token: string) => ({ authorization: `Bearer ${token}` });
-
-async function buildApp(): Promise<FastifyInstance> {
-  const app = Fastify();
-  await app.register(startProjectListingRoute);
-  await app.register(patchProjectListingDraftRoute);
-  await app.register(submitProjectListingRoute);
-  await app.ready();
-  return app;
-}
-
-async function startDraft(
-  app: FastifyInstance,
-): Promise<{ id: string; resumeToken: string }> {
-  const res = await app.inject({
-    method: "POST",
-    url: "/v1/project-listings",
-    payload: START_PAYLOAD,
-  });
-  expect(res.statusCode).toBe(201);
-  return (res.json() as { data: { id: string; resumeToken: string } }).data;
-}
-
-const patch = (
-  app: FastifyInstance,
-  draft: { id: string; resumeToken: string },
-  payload: Record<string, unknown>,
-) =>
-  app.inject({
-    method: "PATCH",
-    url: `/v1/project-listings/drafts/${draft.id}`,
-    headers: bearer(draft.resumeToken),
-    payload,
-  });
-
-const submit = (app: FastifyInstance, draft: { id: string; resumeToken: string }) =>
-  app.inject({
-    method: "POST",
-    url: `/v1/project-listings/drafts/${draft.id}/submit`,
-    headers: bearer(draft.resumeToken),
-  });
-
-const storedRow = (id: string): Row => {
-  const row = rows.find((r) => r["id"] === id);
-  expect(row).toBeDefined();
-  return row!;
-};
-
-const draftBody = (res: { json: () => unknown }) =>
-  (res.json() as { data: Record<string, unknown> }).data;
-
-// ─── Tests ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-describe("the structured founder address (#5279)", () => {
-  setupLeadFileEnv("project-listing-structured-address");
-  let app: FastifyInstance;
-
-  beforeEach(async () => {
-    jest.clearAllMocks();
-    installStore();
-    app = await buildApp();
-  });
-
-  afterEach(async () => {
-    await app.close();
-  });
-
-  describe("the parts arrive as PARTS, and the server composes the display line", () => {
-    it("stores six DISTINCT column values, not one concatenated string", async () => {
-      const draft = await startDraft(app);
-
-      const res = await patch(app, draft, { address: ADDRESS_PARTS });
-
-      expect(res.statusCode).toBe(200);
-
-      // The column-level half. Each part is in its OWN column — a service that
-      // stringified the object would leave every one of these null and this
-      // test is the thing that notices.
-      const row = storedRow(draft.id);
-      expect(row["addressLine1"]).toBe("221B Baker Street");
-      expect(row["addressLine2"]).toBe("Flat B");
-      expect(row["addressCity"]).toBe("London");
-      expect(row["addressRegion"]).toBe("Greater London");
-      expect(row["addressPostalCode"]).toBe("NW1 6XE");
-      expect(row["addressCountry"]).toBe("GB");
-
-      // The display half. `address` is DERIVED here and only here — the parts
-      // in reading order, joined with ", ".
-      expect(row["address"]).toBe(COMPOSED_ADDRESS_LINE);
-    });
-
-    it("answers the save with the composed line AND the parts, separably", async () => {
-      const draft = await startDraft(app);
-
-      const body = draftBody(await patch(app, draft, { address: ADDRESS_PARTS }));
-
-      expect(body["address"]).toBe(COMPOSED_ADDRESS_LINE);
-      expect(body["addressParts"]).toEqual(ADDRESS_PARTS);
-    });
-
-    it("omits the blank addressLine2 from both the columns and the composed line", async () => {
-      const draft = await startDraft(app);
-      const { addressLine2: _line2, ...withoutLine2 } = ADDRESS_PARTS;
-
-      const body = draftBody(await patch(app, draft, { address: withoutLine2 }));
-
-      expect(storedRow(draft.id)["addressLine2"]).toBeNull();
-      expect(body["address"]).toBe("221B Baker Street, London, Greater London, NW1 6XE, GB");
-      expect(body["addressParts"]).toEqual(withoutLine2);
-    });
-
-    it("a composed address submits, and reaches the row as the display line", async () => {
-      const draft = await startDraft(app);
-      await patch(app, draft, { ...APPLICATION_WITHOUT_ADDRESS, address: ADDRESS_PARTS });
-
-      const res = await submit(app, draft);
-
-      expect(res.statusCode).toBe(200);
-      expect(storedRow(draft.id)["address"]).toBe(COMPOSED_ADDRESS_LINE);
-      expect(storedRow(draft.id)["addressCountry"]).toBe("GB");
-    });
-
-    it("refuses parts that are not a whole address, rather than storing half of one", async () => {
-      const draft = await startDraft(app);
-      const { city: _city, ...incomplete } = ADDRESS_PARTS;
-
-      const res = await patch(app, draft, { address: incomplete });
-
-      expect(res.statusCode).toBe(400);
-      expect(storedRow(draft.id)["addressLine1"]).toBeNull();
-      expect(storedRow(draft.id)["address"]).toBeNull();
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe("a legacy free-text address round-trips unchanged, with its parts null", () => {
-    // The load-bearing guard. Nothing may split an existing `address` into
-    // parts — a wrong split silently corrupts the party identification the
-    // listing's privacy notice points at, and a null part is honest where a
-    // guessed one is not.
-    it("comes back CHARACTER-FOR-CHARACTER from a save, with addressParts null", async () => {
-      const draft = await startDraft(app);
-
-      const body = draftBody(await patch(app, draft, { address: LEGACY_ADDRESS_LINE }));
-
-      expect(body["address"]).toBe(LEGACY_ADDRESS_LINE);
-      expect(body["addressParts"]).toBeNull();
-    });
-
-    it("leaves EVERY part column untouched — a plain string writes none of them", async () => {
-      const draft = await startDraft(app);
-
-      await patch(app, draft, { address: LEGACY_ADDRESS_LINE });
-
-      const row = storedRow(draft.id);
-      expect(row["address"]).toBe(LEGACY_ADDRESS_LINE);
-      for (const column of [
-        "addressLine1",
-        "addressLine2",
-        "addressCity",
-        "addressRegion",
-        "addressPostalCode",
-        "addressCountry",
-      ]) {
-        expect(row[column]).toBeNull();
-      }
-    });
-
-    it("submits exactly as it did before #5279, and the stored line is unchanged", async () => {
-      const draft = await startDraft(app);
-      await patch(app, draft, {
-        ...APPLICATION_WITHOUT_ADDRESS,
-        address: LEGACY_ADDRESS_LINE,
-      });
-
-      const res = await submit(app, draft);
-
-      expect(res.statusCode).toBe(200);
-      expect(storedRow(draft.id)["address"]).toBe(LEGACY_ADDRESS_LINE);
-      expect(storedRow(draft.id)["addressLine1"]).toBeNull();
-    });
-
-    // A row written before #5279 holds a line and six nulls. Overwriting the
-    // line with a NEW line must not start inventing parts for it either.
-    it("re-patching a legacy line with another legacy line still writes no parts", async () => {
-      const draft = await startDraft(app);
-      await patch(app, draft, { address: LEGACY_ADDRESS_LINE });
-
-      await patch(app, draft, { address: "1 Example Street, Exampleton, EX1 2AM" });
-
-      const row = storedRow(draft.id);
-      expect(row["address"]).toBe("1 Example Street, Exampleton, EX1 2AM");
-      expect(row["addressCity"]).toBeNull();
-      expect(row["addressCountry"]).toBeNull();
-    });
-  });
-});
-
-// ── #6335 — the explicit workspace setup above is load-bearing ────────────
-//
-// Every case in this file states that this suite's site has a workspace.
-// This one takes that away, and proves the statement was doing work rather
-// than decorating the setup: `startProjectListingDraft` resolves the site it
-// is filing against (`resolveWorkspaceIdForSite`, services/project-listings.ts)
-// and refuses BEFORE any row is written. With the shared prisma mock's old
-// permissive default in place this case could not be written at all — every
-// id resolved, so the fail-closed path was unreachable from a route test.
-describe("#6335 — start fails closed when the site names no workspace", () => {
-  let app: FastifyInstance;
-
-  beforeEach(async () => {
-    jest.clearAllMocks();
-    installStore();
-    mockNoWorkspace(prisma);
-    app = await buildApp();
-  });
-
-  afterEach(async () => {
-    await app.close();
-  });
-
-  it("answers 503 tenant_unresolved and creates no ProjectListing", async () => {
-    const res = await app.inject({
-      method: "POST",
-      url: "/v1/project-listings",
-      payload: START_PAYLOAD,
-    });
-
-    expect(res.statusCode).toBe(503);
-    expect((res.json() as { error: { code: string } }).error.code).toBe(
-      "tenant_unresolved",
-    );
-    expect(prisma.projectListing.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(rows).toHaveLength(0);
-  });
-});