create-ailk 0.24.0 → 0.25.1

package/templates/apps/api/src/services/__tests__/request-confirm.test.ts

@@ -1,531 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * request-confirm.ts (#5970) — the credential, the configuration and the
- * capture-side send.
- *
- * The Prisma boundary is the repo-standard `__mocks__/prisma.ts` double; the
- * email package is mocked at the PACKAGE boundary (never at an internal
- * module), the shape every service suite in this directory uses.
- */
-
-const mockSendRequestConfirmEmail = jest.fn();
-const mockSendLeadNotification = jest.fn();
-
-jest.mock("@working-theory/email", () => ({
-  sendRequestConfirmEmail: (...args: unknown[]) =>
-    mockSendRequestConfirmEmail(...args),
-  sendRequestPaidLinkEmail: jest.fn(),
-  sendLeadNotification: (...args: unknown[]) =>
-    mockSendLeadNotification(...args),
-}));
-
-// eslint-disable-next-line no-restricted-syntax -- lib/prisma.ts wraps the external DB boundary (PrismaClient requires a live connection); __mocks__/prisma.ts is the repo-standard test double for this boundary.
-jest.mock("../../lib/prisma.js");
-
-import { prisma } from "../../lib/prisma.js";
-import { routeLead } from "../lead-routing.js";
-import * as personService from "../person.js";
-import {
-  CONFIRM_TOKEN_TTL_MS,
-  claimConfirmation,
-  confirmLinkFor,
-  hashConfirmToken,
-  recordPaymentLink,
-  requestConfirmConfig,
-  requestConfirmSupersedesNotification,
-  resolveConfirmableRequest,
-  sendRequestConfirmLink,
-} from "../request-confirm.js";
-
-const CALLBACK_ID = "callbk_0000000000000001";
-const REQUEST = { name: "Ada Lovelace", phone: "+44 7700 900000" };
-
-/** Turn the fire-and-forget `void` entry point into something awaitable. */
-const flush = () => new Promise((resolve) => setImmediate(resolve));
-
-const ENV_KEYS = [
-  "AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_ENABLED",
-  "AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_TO",
-  "AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_FROM",
-  "AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_CURRENCY",
-  "AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_MAX_MINOR",
-  "AILK_LEAD_NOTIFICATION_TO",
-  "AILK_LEAD_NOTIFICATION_FROM",
-  "AILK_PUBLIC_API_URL",
-  "AILK_ENABLED_MODULES",
-] as const;
-
-function enable(overrides: Record<string, string | undefined> = {}) {
-  process.env["AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_ENABLED"] = "true";
-  process.env["AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_TO"] = "owner@example.com";
-  process.env["AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_FROM"] = "hello@example.com";
-  process.env["AILK_PUBLIC_API_URL"] = "https://api.example.com";
-  for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(overrides)) {
-    if (value === undefined) delete process.env[key];
-    else process.env[key] = value;
-  }
-}
-
-beforeEach(() => {
-  jest.clearAllMocks();
-  for (const key of ENV_KEYS) delete process.env[key];
-  mockSendRequestConfirmEmail.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true, messageId: "m1" });
-  mockSendLeadNotification.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true, messageId: "m0" });
-  (prisma.callback.updateMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({ count: 1 });
-  (prisma.callback.update as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({});
-  (prisma.callback.findFirst as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(null);
-});
-
-afterEach(() => {
-  for (const key of ENV_KEYS) delete process.env[key];
-});
-
-// ── The credential ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-describe("the confirm credential", () => {
-  it("stores a digest that is never the token itself", async () => {
-    enable();
-    sendRequestConfirmLink(CALLBACK_ID, REQUEST);
-    await flush();
-
-    const stored = (prisma.callback.updateMany as jest.Mock).mock.calls[0][0];
-    const link = mockSendRequestConfirmEmail.mock.calls[0][0]
-      .confirmLink as string;
-    const token = new URL(link).searchParams.get("token")!;
-
-    expect(token).toHaveLength(43); // 32 CSPRNG bytes, base64url
-    expect(stored.data.confirmTokenHash).toBe(hashConfirmToken(token));
-    expect(stored.data.confirmTokenHash).not.toBe(token);
-    // The mint guard is what makes the credential one-per-row — and
-    // `confirmedAt: null` beside it is what stops a fresh credential landing
-    // on an ALREADY-CONFIRMED row, whose digest is also null (#5970 security
-    // review, § 8).
-    expect(stored.where).toEqual({
-      id: CALLBACK_ID,
-      confirmTokenHash: null,
-      confirmedAt: null,
-    });
-  });
-
-  it("expires the credential seven days out", async () => {
-    enable();
-    const before = Date.now();
-    sendRequestConfirmLink(CALLBACK_ID, REQUEST);
-    await flush();
-
-    const stored = (prisma.callback.updateMany as jest.Mock).mock.calls[0][0];
-    const expiry = (stored.data.confirmTokenExpiresAt as Date).getTime();
-    expect(CONFIRM_TOKEN_TTL_MS).toBe(7 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000);
-    expect(expiry).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(before + CONFIRM_TOKEN_TTL_MS);
-    expect(expiry).toBeLessThanOrEqual(Date.now() + CONFIRM_TOKEN_TTL_MS);
-  });
-
-  it("mints a different token every time", async () => {
-    enable();
-    sendRequestConfirmLink(CALLBACK_ID, REQUEST);
-    await flush();
-    sendRequestConfirmLink(CALLBACK_ID, REQUEST);
-    await flush();
-    const [a, b] = mockSendRequestConfirmEmail.mock.calls.map(
-      (call) => call[0].confirmLink as string,
-    );
-    expect(a).not.toBe(b);
-  });
-
-  it("builds the confirm link on the API's own origin, token percent-encoded", () => {
-    const link = confirmLinkFor(
-      "https://api.example.com",
-      CALLBACK_ID,
-      "a+b/c=",
-    );
-    const url = new URL(link);
-    expect(url.origin).toBe("https://api.example.com");
-    expect(url.pathname).toBe(`/v1/requests/${CALLBACK_ID}/confirm`);
-    expect(url.searchParams.get("token")).toBe("a+b/c=");
-    expect(url.search).not.toContain("a+b/c=");
-  });
-});
-
-// ── Resolution: the four refusals are indistinguishable ────────────────────
-
-describe("resolveConfirmableRequest()", () => {
-  it("puts the id, the digest, the expiry and the not-confirmed predicate in one where", async () => {
-    await resolveConfirmableRequest(CALLBACK_ID, "tok");
-    const call = (prisma.callback.findFirst as jest.Mock).mock.calls[0][0];
-    expect(call.where.id).toBe(CALLBACK_ID);
-    expect(call.where.confirmTokenHash).toBe(hashConfirmToken("tok"));
-    expect(call.where.confirmedAt).toBeNull();
-    expect(call.where.confirmTokenExpiresAt.gt).toBeInstanceOf(Date);
-  });
-
-  it("returns null when nothing matches — a tampered, expired, spent or cross-row token alike", async () => {
-    (prisma.callback.findFirst as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(null);
-    await expect(
-      resolveConfirmableRequest(CALLBACK_ID, "wrong"),
-    ).resolves.toBeNull();
-  });
-});
-
-// ── Claiming: verification and stamping in one guarded update ──────────────
-
-describe("claimConfirmation()", () => {
-  const CLAIM = {
-    id: CALLBACK_ID,
-    token: "tok",
-    confirmedTime: "Tuesday 9am",
-    buyerEmail: "buyer@example.com",
-    amountMinor: 12900,
-    currency: "usd",
-  };
-
-  it("carries the same four predicates the resolver does, and spends the credential", async () => {
-    await expect(claimConfirmation(CLAIM)).resolves.toBe(true);
-    const call = (prisma.callback.updateMany as jest.Mock).mock.calls[0][0];
-    expect(call.where.id).toBe(CALLBACK_ID);
-    expect(call.where.confirmTokenHash).toBe(hashConfirmToken("tok"));
-    expect(call.where.confirmedAt).toBeNull();
-    expect(call.where.confirmTokenExpiresAt.gt).toBeInstanceOf(Date);
-    expect(call.data.confirmedAt).toBeInstanceOf(Date);
-    expect(call.data.confirmedTime).toBe("Tuesday 9am");
-    expect(call.data.buyerEmail).toBe("buyer@example.com");
-    expect(call.data.amountMinor).toBe(12900);
-    expect(call.data.currency).toBe("usd");
-    // Spending the credential is in the SAME statement as the stamp.
-    expect(call.data.confirmTokenHash).toBeNull();
-  });
-
-  it("omits amount and currency when the caller resolved a catalogue price instead", async () => {
-    await claimConfirmation({
-      id: CALLBACK_ID,
-      token: "tok",
-      confirmedTime: "Tuesday 9am",
-      buyerEmail: "buyer@example.com",
-    });
-    const call = (prisma.callback.updateMany as jest.Mock).mock.calls[0][0];
-    expect(call.data).not.toHaveProperty("amountMinor");
-    expect(call.data).not.toHaveProperty("currency");
-  });
-
-  it("reports false when no row matched — the loser of a double-POST race", async () => {
-    (prisma.callback.updateMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({ count: 0 });
-    await expect(claimConfirmation(CLAIM)).resolves.toBe(false);
-  });
-});
-
-describe("recordPaymentLink()", () => {
-  it("writes the artifact id the webhook stamp matches on", async () => {
-    await recordPaymentLink(CALLBACK_ID, "plink_abc");
-    expect(prisma.callback.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
-      where: { id: CALLBACK_ID },
-      data: { stripePaymentLinkId: "plink_abc" },
-    });
-  });
-
-  // ── #8435 D5 (AC-3) — the Person step, after the Payment Link exists ────
-  describe("links the confirmed callback to its Person", () => {
-    const WORKSPACE = "wksp_00000000-0000-7000-8000-0000000084e5";
-    const PERSON = "person_00000000-0000-7000-8000-0000000084e5";
-    const LINKED = {
-      ok: true as const,
-      value: { personId: PERSON as never, created: true, billing: "unchanged" as const },
-    };
-    const row = (overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) => ({
-      workspaceId: WORKSPACE,
-      buyerEmail: "Buyer@Example.com",
-      name: "Bea",
-      phone: "+1 415 555 0123",
-      personId: null,
-      ...overrides,
-    });
-    let find: jest.SpyInstance;
-
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      find = jest.spyOn(personService, "findOrCreatePerson").mockResolvedValue(LINKED);
-    });
-    afterEach(() => find.mockRestore());
-
-    it("writes the link id first, then finds the buyer email's Person in the row's own workspace and stamps it once, guarded on personId: null", async () => {
-      (prisma.callback.findFirst as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(row());
-      await recordPaymentLink(CALLBACK_ID, "plink_abc");
-
-      expect(find).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
-      expect(find).toHaveBeenCalledWith(WORKSPACE, {
-        email: "Buyer@Example.com",
-        name: "Bea",
-        contact: { telephone: "+14155550123" },
-      });
-      expect(prisma.callback.updateMany).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
-      expect(prisma.callback.updateMany).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
-        where: { id: CALLBACK_ID, workspaceId: WORKSPACE, personId: null },
-        data: { personId: PERSON },
-      });
-      const order = (fn: jest.Mock) => fn.mock.invocationCallOrder[0]!;
-      expect(order(prisma.callback.update as jest.Mock)).toBeLessThan(order(prisma.callback.findFirst as jest.Mock));
-    });
-
-    it("makes no Person call for a callback a capture already linked", async () => {
-      (prisma.callback.findFirst as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(row({ personId: PERSON }));
-      await recordPaymentLink(CALLBACK_ID, "plink_abc");
-      expect(find).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-      expect(prisma.callback.updateMany).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    });
-
-    it("makes no Person call for a row with no buyer email", async () => {
-      (prisma.callback.findFirst as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(row({ buyerEmail: null }));
-      await recordPaymentLink(CALLBACK_ID, "plink_abc");
-      expect(find).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    });
-
-    it("a Person step that throws still leaves the link id written and recordPaymentLink resolving", async () => {
-      (prisma.callback.findFirst as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(row());
-      find.mockRejectedValue(new Error("down"));
-      await expect(recordPaymentLink(CALLBACK_ID, "plink_abc")).resolves.toBeUndefined();
-      expect(prisma.callback.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
-        where: { id: CALLBACK_ID },
-        data: { stripePaymentLinkId: "plink_abc" },
-      });
-      expect(prisma.callback.updateMany).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    });
-
-    it("a read that throws is swallowed the same way", async () => {
-      (prisma.callback.findFirst as jest.Mock).mockRejectedValue(new Error("down"));
-      await expect(recordPaymentLink(CALLBACK_ID, "plink_abc")).resolves.toBeUndefined();
-    });
-
-    it("claimConfirmation makes no person delegate call at all — the token is spent before any Person work", async () => {
-      (prisma.callback.findFirst as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(row());
-      await claimConfirmation({
-        id: CALLBACK_ID,
-        token: "a-token",
-        confirmedTime: "Friday 3pm",
-        buyerEmail: "buyer@example.com",
-      });
-      expect(find).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-      expect(jest.mocked(prisma.person.findFirst)).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-      expect(jest.mocked(prisma.person.createMany)).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-      expect(jest.mocked(prisma.person.updateMany)).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    });
-  });
-});
-
-// ── Configuration ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-describe("requestConfirmConfig()", () => {
-  it("is null with the flag unset — the default every existing suite runs under", () => {
-    expect(requestConfirmConfig()).toBeNull();
-    expect(requestConfirmSupersedesNotification()).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it("is null when the flag is on but no recipient resolves", () => {
-    enable({ AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_TO: undefined });
-    expect(requestConfirmConfig()).toBeNull();
-  });
-
-  it("is null when the flag is on but no base URL resolves", () => {
-    enable({ AILK_PUBLIC_API_URL: undefined });
-    expect(requestConfirmConfig()).toBeNull();
-  });
-
-  it("falls back to the lead-notification pair for recipient and sender", () => {
-    enable({
-      AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_TO: undefined,
-      AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_FROM: undefined,
-      AILK_LEAD_NOTIFICATION_TO: "ops@example.com",
-      AILK_LEAD_NOTIFICATION_FROM: "noreply@example.com",
-    });
-    expect(requestConfirmConfig()).toMatchObject({
-      to: "ops@example.com",
-      from: "noreply@example.com",
-    });
-  });
-
-  it("is null on a MULTI-TENANT build, however completely it is configured", () => {
-    // #5970 security review, finding 3. Every value here is process-wide, as
-    // is STRIPE_SECRET_KEY — so on a multi-tenant deployment one tenant's
-    // customer would pay into the deployment's own Stripe account. The feature
-    // fails closed there rather than mis-routing money.
-    enable();
-    expect(requestConfirmConfig()).not.toBeNull();
-    process.env["AILK_ENABLED_MODULES"] = "multi-tenant,docs";
-    expect(requestConfirmConfig()).toBeNull();
-    // And because the notification predicate reads the same function, the
-    // generic lead notification is NOT suppressed on such a build — the
-    // callback path is byte-for-byte what it was before this feature.
-    expect(requestConfirmSupersedesNotification()).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it("caps the money-gate ceiling at the column's own limit", () => {
-    // `amount_minor` is a Postgres INTEGER. A ceiling above it would admit an
-    // amount that passes every check and then throws out of Prisma at write
-    // time — a 500 on a money path, from a configuration typo (§ 8).
-    enable({ AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_MAX_MINOR: "99999999999" });
-    expect(requestConfirmConfig()?.maxAmountMinor).toBe(2_147_483_647);
-  });
-
-  it("defaults the currency and the money-gate ceiling", () => {
-    enable();
-    expect(requestConfirmConfig()).toMatchObject({
-      currency: "usd",
-      maxAmountMinor: 1_000_000,
-    });
-  });
-
-  it("takes a configured currency and ceiling, and ignores ones that do not parse", () => {
-    enable({
-      AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_CURRENCY: "GBP",
-      AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_MAX_MINOR: "50000",
-    });
-    expect(requestConfirmConfig()).toMatchObject({
-      currency: "gbp",
-      maxAmountMinor: 50000,
-    });
-
-    // A ceiling that does not parse must not become NaN (which refuses every
-    // amount) or unbounded — it falls back to the platform default.
-    enable({ AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_MAX_MINOR: "lots" });
-    expect(requestConfirmConfig()?.maxAmountMinor).toBe(1_000_000);
-    enable({ AILK_REQUEST_CONFIRM_MAX_MINOR: "-5" });
-    expect(requestConfirmConfig()?.maxAmountMinor).toBe(1_000_000);
-  });
-});
-
-// ── The capture-side send ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-describe("sendRequestConfirmLink()", () => {
-  it("writes no credential and sends nothing when the feature is off", async () => {
-    sendRequestConfirmLink(CALLBACK_ID, REQUEST);
-    await flush();
-    expect(prisma.callback.updateMany).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(mockSendRequestConfirmEmail).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  it("sends exactly one email, carrying the request's details, when configured", async () => {
-    enable();
-    sendRequestConfirmLink(CALLBACK_ID, {
-      ...REQUEST,
-      preferredTime: "Tuesday morning",
-    });
-    await flush();
-
-    expect(mockSendRequestConfirmEmail).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
-    expect(mockSendRequestConfirmEmail.mock.calls[0][0]).toMatchObject({
-      to: "owner@example.com",
-      fromAddress: "hello@example.com",
-      request: {
-        name: "Ada Lovelace",
-        phone: "+44 7700 900000",
-        preferredTime: "Tuesday morning",
-      },
-    });
-  });
-
-  it("sends nothing when the row already carries a live credential", async () => {
-    enable();
-    (prisma.callback.updateMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({ count: 0 });
-    sendRequestConfirmLink(CALLBACK_ID, REQUEST);
-    await flush();
-    expect(mockSendRequestConfirmEmail).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  it("never throws when the email package reports a failure", async () => {
-    enable();
-    mockSendRequestConfirmEmail.mockResolvedValue({
-      ok: false,
-      error: { kind: "send_failed", message: "domain not verified" },
-    });
-    expect(() => sendRequestConfirmLink(CALLBACK_ID, REQUEST)).not.toThrow();
-    await flush();
-  });
-
-  it("never throws when the database write itself rejects", async () => {
-    enable();
-    (prisma.callback.updateMany as jest.Mock).mockRejectedValue(
-      new Error("connection reset"),
-    );
-    expect(() => sendRequestConfirmLink(CALLBACK_ID, REQUEST)).not.toThrow();
-    await flush();
-    expect(mockSendRequestConfirmEmail).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-});
-
-// ── "Exactly one email" (AC-1), measured across both senders ───────────────
-//
-// The claim AC-1 makes is about the TENANT'S INBOX, and two modules decide
-// what lands in it: `lead-routing.ts` sends the generic notification, this
-// module sends the confirm message. Asserting either one alone would leave the
-// interesting failure — both firing, or neither — untested. So these two cases
-// drive `routeLead` itself and count BOTH senders.
-describe("exactly one email reaches the tenant (AC-1)", () => {
-  const CALLBACK = {
-    kind: "callback" as const,
-    siteId: "site_1",
-    name: "Ada Lovelace",
-    phone: "+44 7700 900000",
-    payload: {},
-  };
-  const META = {
-    ip: "203.0.113.1",
-    userAgent: "test",
-    receivedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
-  };
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    process.env["DATABASE_URL"] = "postgresql://localhost/test";
-    (prisma.callback.create as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
-      id: CALLBACK_ID,
-    });
-  });
-
-  it("with the feature ON: the confirm email replaces the generic notification", async () => {
-    enable();
-    const result = await routeLead(CALLBACK, META);
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-
-    // The generic notification is suppressed — that is what makes the total
-    // one rather than two.
-    expect(mockSendLeadNotification).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(result.ok && result.email).toEqual({
-      skipped: true,
-      reason: "request_confirm",
-    });
-
-    // And the confirm message is the one that goes.
-    sendRequestConfirmLink(CALLBACK_ID, REQUEST);
-    await flush();
-    expect(mockSendRequestConfirmEmail).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
-  });
-
-  it("on the FILE-FALLBACK path the generic notification still goes, feature on or not", async () => {
-    // #5970 security review round 3, M1. When the DB is unavailable the
-    // callback is written to the file fallback and there is no row to mint a
-    // credential against — so suppressing the generic notification would have
-    // meant ZERO operator emails for every callback captured during an outage,
-    // on the one surface whose whole point is that an outage must not lose a
-    // lead.
-    enable();
-    process.env["AILK_LEAD_NOTIFICATION_TO"] = "ops@example.com";
-    process.env["AILK_LEAD_NOTIFICATION_FROM"] = "noreply@example.com";
-    (prisma.callback.create as jest.Mock).mockRejectedValue(
-      new Error("connection reset"),
-    );
-
-    const result = await routeLead(CALLBACK, META);
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.ok && result.persisted).toBe("file");
-    // The email the operator would otherwise never have received.
-    expect(mockSendLeadNotification).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
-    expect(mockSendRequestConfirmEmail).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  it("with the feature OFF: the generic notification still goes, exactly as before", async () => {
-    process.env["AILK_LEAD_NOTIFICATION_TO"] = "ops@example.com";
-    process.env["AILK_LEAD_NOTIFICATION_FROM"] = "noreply@example.com";
-    const result = await routeLead(CALLBACK, META);
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    expect(mockSendLeadNotification).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
-
-    // And nothing from this feature runs at all.
-    sendRequestConfirmLink(CALLBACK_ID, REQUEST);
-    await flush();
-    expect(mockSendRequestConfirmEmail).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-});