create-ailk 0.2.0 → 0.3.0

package/templates/apps/api/src/services/project-listing-flow.ts

@@ -1,426 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * @file project-listing-flow.ts
- * @description The approve-time projection (#5001): a `ProjectListing` row's
- * `questions` block becomes a live diagnostic — one `FlowDefinition` the
- * visitor walks at `/v1/flows/{slug}` and one `WaitlistExperiment` keyed
- * `{slug}` that scores the walk through the shared scoring rule
- * (`@working-theory/database/flows/listing-diagnostic`).
- *
- * `generateListingFlow` writes through the two existing validated paths —
- * `upsertFlowDefinition` (`flow-engine.ts`) and `upsertWaitlistExperiment`
- * (`waitlist-experiments.ts`) — never a second ad-hoc Prisma write, and
- * never `seedWaitlistExperiments`/`materializeWaitlistFlows`. Both underlying
- * writes upsert on `[siteId, slug]` / `[siteId, key]`, and the `experimentKey`
- * write-back is the same value every time, so re-approving a listing is a
- * no-op rather than a duplicate.
- *
- * ONE vocabulary for the scored questions, since #5036 D4: the flow renders
- * the founder's own option LABELS under the founder's own option VALUES, the
- * register keys its `optionWeights` on those same values
- * (`buildListingDiagnosticScoring`), and the experiment's `questionSet`
- * declares that same per-listing option list — which is what satisfies
- * `waitlistExperimentConfigSchema`'s "every weights key must be a declared
- * option of the question it names" cross-validation. The old
- * `q{n}:{i}of{k}` positional token, and the finite value universe it forced
- * the question set to declare, are both gone. Only the EXTRAS keep a
- * positional encoding (`x1:0of3`); they are unscored, so nothing resolves
- * them by value.
- *
- * The tier NEVER reaches the visitor: the flow's terminal `message` step
- * carries the confirmation line and the founder's own one-liner, and the
- * config declares no `thankYou` / `deliverables` block, so nothing on the
- * visitor's path can render a scoring outcome.
- *
- * PII boundary: logs and returned errors carry only `{ siteId, listingId,
- * slug }` — never `founderEmail`, `founderName`, or `questions` (the same
- * discipline `project-listings.ts` and `lead-routing.ts` document).
- */
-
-import { buildListingDiagnosticScoring } from "@working-theory/database/flows/listing-diagnostic";
-import type {
-  FlowConfig,
-  FlowStep,
-  ProjectListingQuestions,
-  WaitlistQuestion,
-} from "@working-theory/validation";
-
-import { prisma } from "../lib/prisma.js";
-
-import { upsertFlowDefinition } from "./flow-engine.js";
-import { upsertWaitlistExperiment } from "./waitlist-experiments.js";
-
-// ─── Types ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-/** The subset of the row the projection reads. */
-export type ListingFlowSource = {
-  id: string;
-  siteId: string;
-  slug: string;
-  name: string;
-  oneLiner: string;
-  questions: ProjectListingQuestions;
-};
-
-export type GenerateListingFlowError = {
-  kind: "invalid_input" | "flows_not_configured";
-  message: string;
-};
-
-export type GenerateListingFlowResult =
-  | { ok: true; flowSlug: string; experimentKey: string }
-  | { ok: false; error: GenerateListingFlowError };
-
-const DEFAULT_LOCALE = "en";
-const en = (s: string) => ({ [DEFAULT_LOCALE]: s });
-
-/** At most three extras (`projectListingQuestionsSchema`). */
-type ExtraIndex = 1 | 2 | 3;
-
-// ─── Identifier derivation ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-/**
- * The register-internal waitlist key for a listing slug. A listing slug is
- * kebab AND may start with a digit (`^[a-z0-9-]{3,48}$`, #4998), while
- * `flowIdentifierSchema` demands `^[a-z][a-z0-9_]*$` — so the `listing_`
- * prefix is load-bearing, not decoration. 8 + 48 = 56 ≤ the 64-char cap.
- */
-export function listingWaitlistKey(slug: string): string {
-  return `listing_${slug.replace(/-/g, "_")}`;
-}
-
-/** `extra_1` … `extra_3` — the flow field name and question id for one extra. */
-function extraFieldName(index: ExtraIndex): string {
-  return `extra_${index}`;
-}
-
-/**
- * An extra's option value — `x1:0of3`. Extras carry no points and no
- * register resolves them, so the positional encoding survives #5036 D4's move
- * to value-keyed scoring: nothing depends on an extra's value MEANING
- * anything, only on it being stable and listing-independent for the CSV and
- * any later reader.
- */
-function extraOptionValue(index: ExtraIndex, optionIndex: number, arity: number): string {
-  return `x${index}:${optionIndex}of${arity}`;
-}
-
-// ─── The flow (what the visitor walks) ──────────────────────────────────────
-
-/**
- * One option as every optioned question declares it — the founder's own
- * `{ value, label }` pair. Since #5036 D4 the scored Q3–Q6 carry exactly the
- * same shape as the unscored Q2: no positional rewrite in between.
- */
-type OptionPair = { value: string; label: string };
-
-/** One single-select `field` step — the shape every diagnostic question takes. */
-function selectStep(
-  key: string,
-  fieldName: string,
-  prompt: string,
-  options: readonly OptionPair[],
-): FlowStep {
-  return {
-    key,
-    type: "field",
-    copy: { title: en(prompt) },
-    fields: [
-      {
-        name: fieldName,
-        inputType: "select",
-        required: true,
-        options: options.map((o) => ({ value: o.value, label: en(o.label) })),
-        copy: { label: en(prompt) },
-      },
-    ],
-  };
-}
-
-/**
- * The six-category step order (#5001): contact → segment → problem → fit →
- * urgency → price → open → extras, then the confirmation.
- */
-function buildFlowSteps(listing: ListingFlowSource): FlowStep[] {
-  const { questions } = listing;
-
-  const steps: FlowStep[] = [
-    {
-      key: "contact",
-      type: "field",
-      copy: { title: en(`Join the ${listing.name} waitlist`) },
-      fields: [
-        {
-          name: "name",
-          inputType: "text",
-          mapsTo: "name",
-          copy: { label: en("Name") },
-        },
-        {
-          name: "email",
-          inputType: "email",
-          required: true,
-          mapsTo: "email",
-          copy: { label: en("Email") },
-        },
-      ],
-    },
-    // Every optioned question — the unscored Q2 (including the fixed
-    // `just-curious` bail-out its schema pins last) and the scored Q3–Q6
-    // alike — renders under the founder's OWN option values, so the raw value
-    // in the session state the weekly CSV reads is the same value the
-    // register scores.
-    selectStep("segment", "q2", questions.q2.prompt, questions.q2.options),
-    selectStep("problem", "q3", questions.q3.prompt, questions.q3.options),
-    selectStep("fit", "q4", questions.q4.prompt, questions.q4.options),
-    selectStep("urgency", "q5", questions.q5.prompt, questions.q5.options),
-    selectStep("price", "q6", questions.q6.prompt, questions.q6.options),
-    {
-      key: "open",
-      type: "field",
-      copy: { title: en(questions.q7.prompt) },
-      fields: [
-        {
-          name: "q7",
-          inputType: "textarea",
-          copy: { label: en(questions.q7.prompt) },
-        },
-      ],
-    },
-  ];
-
-  if (questions.extras.length > 0) {
-    steps.push({
-      key: "extras",
-      type: "field",
-      copy: { title: en("A few more questions") },
-      fields: questions.extras.map((extra, i) => {
-        const index = (i + 1) as ExtraIndex;
-        return {
-          name: extraFieldName(index),
-          inputType: "select" as const,
-          required: true,
-          options: extra.options.map((option, optionIndex) => ({
-            value: extraOptionValue(index, optionIndex, extra.options.length),
-            label: en(option.label),
-          })),
-          copy: { label: en(extra.prompt) },
-        };
-      }),
-    });
-  }
-
-  // Confirmation only — the founder's own line, never the tier.
-  steps.push({
-    key: "done",
-    type: "message",
-    copy: {
-      title: en(`You're on the ${listing.name} waitlist`),
-      ...(listing.oneLiner.trim().length > 0 && { body: en(listing.oneLiner) }),
-    },
-  });
-
-  return steps;
-}
-
-function buildFlowConfig(listing: ListingFlowSource): FlowConfig {
-  return {
-    slug: listing.slug,
-    defaultLocale: DEFAULT_LOCALE,
-    steps: buildFlowSteps(listing),
-    experiment: {
-      key: listing.slug,
-      waitlist: listingWaitlistKey(listing.slug),
-    },
-  };
-}
-
-// ─── The experiment (what scores the walk) ──────────────────────────────────
-
-/**
- * The register's question set — every question mirrors the flow exactly,
- * Q3–Q6 included: since #5036 D4 the register scores this listing's OWN
- * option values, so the question set declares this listing's own options and
- * the config-level cross-validation passes without a value universe.
- */
-function buildQuestionSet(listing: ListingFlowSource): WaitlistQuestion[] {
-  const { questions } = listing;
-
-  const scored = (["q3", "q4", "q5", "q6"] as const).map((id) => ({
-    id,
-    prompt: en(questions[id].prompt),
-    answerType: "single" as const,
-    options: questions[id].options.map((o) => ({ value: o.value, label: en(o.label) })),
-  }));
-
-  return [
-    {
-      id: "name",
-      prompt: en("Name"),
-      answerType: "text" as const,
-      required: false,
-      mapsTo: "name" as const,
-    },
-    {
-      id: "email",
-      prompt: en("Email"),
-      answerType: "email" as const,
-      mapsTo: "email" as const,
-    },
-    {
-      id: "q2",
-      prompt: en(questions.q2.prompt),
-      answerType: "single" as const,
-      options: questions.q2.options.map((o) => ({ value: o.value, label: en(o.label) })),
-    },
-    ...scored,
-    {
-      id: "q7",
-      prompt: en(questions.q7.prompt),
-      answerType: "text" as const,
-      required: false,
-    },
-    ...questions.extras.map((extra, i) => {
-      const index = (i + 1) as ExtraIndex;
-      return {
-        id: extraFieldName(index),
-        prompt: en(extra.prompt),
-        answerType: "single" as const,
-        options: extra.options.map((option, optionIndex) => ({
-          value: extraOptionValue(index, optionIndex, extra.options.length),
-          label: en(option.label),
-        })),
-      };
-    }),
-  ];
-}
-
-function buildExperimentConfig(listing: ListingFlowSource): unknown {
-  const waitlistKey = listingWaitlistKey(listing.slug);
-  return {
-    key: listing.slug,
-    mode: "qualifying",
-    status: "live",
-    waitlists: [{ key: waitlistKey, flowSlug: listing.slug }],
-    questionSet: { version: 1, questions: buildQuestionSet(listing) },
-    // The shared scoring RULE, applied to this listing's own option values
-    // — same point names, same total, same tier floors for every listing;
-    // only the Q3/Q4 weight keys differ, because those keys are the founder's
-    // own values (#5036 D4). Embedded verbatim:
-    // `waitlistExperimentConfigSchema` carries scoring by value and declares
-    // no by-reference slot.
-    scoring: buildListingDiagnosticScoring(listing.questions),
-    tracking: {
-      version: 1,
-      utm: { source: "utm_source", medium: "utm_medium", campaign: "utm_campaign" },
-      waitlists: { [waitlistKey]: { campaign: listing.slug, channels: ["direct"] } },
-    },
-    stripeConfigRef: null,
-  };
-}
-
-// ─── The inverse (what the weekly CSV reads) ────────────────────────────────
-
-/**
- * `field name -> option value -> the founder's own label`, for every optioned
- * question the projection emits. The weekly CSV (`listing-csv-sweep.ts`)
- * renders a signup's stored answer through this so the founder reads their own
- * wording rather than a bare value.
- *
- * Q2–Q6 collapse to a plain value→label map since #5036 D4: the flow renders
- * the founder's own values, so the inverse is the founder's own option list
- * read the other way round. Only the extras still need the positional
- * `extraOptionValue` — derived from the SAME call the projection emits, so
- * the two can never disagree about what a stored value means.
- */
-export function listingAnswerLabels(
-  questions: ProjectListingQuestions,
-): Record<string, Record<string, string>> {
-  const labels: Record<string, Record<string, string>> = {};
-
-  for (const question of ["q2", "q3", "q4", "q5", "q6"] as const) {
-    labels[question] = Object.fromEntries(
-      questions[question].options.map((option) => [option.value, option.label]),
-    );
-  }
-
-  questions.extras.forEach((extra, i) => {
-    const index = (i + 1) as ExtraIndex;
-    labels[extraFieldName(index)] = Object.fromEntries(
-      extra.options.map((option, optionIndex) => [
-        extraOptionValue(index, optionIndex, extra.options.length),
-        option.label,
-      ]),
-    );
-  });
-
-  return labels;
-}
-
-// ─── generateListingFlow ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-/**
- * Project an approved listing into its live diagnostic. Idempotent: both
- * writes upsert on their natural key and the `experimentKey` write-back is
- * stable, so a second approve changes nothing.
- *
- * Both joins are stated rather than inferred (#5036 D6d). The definition
- * carries the listing's id, so a session started on this flow names the
- * listing directly instead of relying on the flow's slug matching it; and the
- * listing stores the experiment's KEY, which is the string `WaitlistScore`
- * itself holds, so reading a listing's submissions is one hop rather than an
- * id-to-key lookup. ADR 0009 forbids a relation across the namespace
- * boundary, so both are plain strings — which is exactly why each has to be
- * the string the other side actually stores.
- *
- * The FLOW is written first: an experiment row whose `waitlists[].flowSlug`
- * resolves to nothing would leave `GET /v1/flows/{slug}` answering
- * `flow_not_found` while the dashboard already showed a live experiment. The
- * reverse ordering (a servable flow whose experiment has not landed yet)
- * degrades to "collected, not yet scored" — recoverable on the next approve.
- */
-export async function generateListingFlow(
-  listing: ListingFlowSource,
-): Promise<GenerateListingFlowResult> {
-  const flow = await upsertFlowDefinition(
-    listing.siteId,
-    buildFlowConfig(listing),
-    listing.id,
-  );
-  if (!flow.ok) {
-    return {
-      ok: false,
-      error: {
-        kind: flow.error.kind === "flows_not_configured" ? "flows_not_configured" : "invalid_input",
-        message: flow.error.message,
-      },
-    };
-  }
-
-  const experiment = await upsertWaitlistExperiment(
-    listing.siteId,
-    buildExperimentConfig(listing),
-  );
-  if (!experiment.ok) {
-    return {
-      ok: false,
-      error: {
-        kind:
-          experiment.error.kind === "flows_not_configured"
-            ? "flows_not_configured"
-            : "invalid_input",
-        message: experiment.error.message,
-      },
-    };
-  }
-
-  // The experiment's key IS the listing's slug (`buildExperimentConfig`), and
-  // it is what `WaitlistScore.experimentKey` stores.
-  const experimentKey = listing.slug;
-
-  await prisma.projectListing.update({
-    where: { id: listing.id },
-    data: { experimentKey },
-  });
-
-  return { ok: true, flowSlug: listing.slug, experimentKey };
-}

package/templates/apps/api/src/services/project-listing-issue.ts

@@ -1,251 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * @file project-listing-issue.ts
- * @description The approve-time GitHub issue filing (#5000): an approved
- * `ProjectListing` becomes a work order filed on the SITE's own repo
- * (`AILK_GITHUB_REPO`), in the shape that repo's issue-claiming pipeline
- * reads (`.claude/skills/file-issue/references/issue.md`'s canonical Issue
- * body — `## What` / `## Why` / `## Acceptance Criteria` / `## Scope` /
- * `## Grounding` / the `<!-- dep-graph: -->` block).
- *
- * `renderListingIssue` is pure — no fetch, no Prisma, no config read — so
- * the shape is unit-testable against a fixture row with no network double.
- * `fileListingIssue` is the effectful half: skip (env absent, or `issueUrl`
- * already set) -> POST -> write `issueUrl` back on 201 -> log + return on
- * ANY failure. It never throws; `project-listing-decision.ts`'s
- * `sendListingDecisionEmail` calls it fire-and-forget after the founder
- * email, with its own `.catch` boundary on top of the try/catch below, so a
- * filing failure can never reach the approve path that has already
- * committed.
- *
- * Injection hardening, mirroring `slack-notify.ts`'s `escapeMrkdwn` for the
- * same class of anonymous-input risk (PR #4999 security review): every
- * founder-authored scalar field (name/oneLiner/audience/problem/founderName/
- * founderCompany/url) is (1) collapsed to a single line — an embedded
- * newline could otherwise open a line with `## ` and forge a section a
- * naive line-based consumer parser reads as real (e.g. a fake `## Scope`
- * re-pointing what a worker builds), and (2) rendered as inline code, which
- * GitHub never parses for an `@mention` or `#issue` auto-link. The
- * `questions` block is embedded as fenced JSON instead — `JSON.stringify`
- * already escapes any embedded newline to the two-character `\n` sequence,
- * so no extra sanitization is needed there, and it stays byte-for-byte the
- * stored value (#5000 AC2 — "the questions block verbatim").
- *
- * PII boundary: `founderEmail` lives on `ProjectListing` but is never
- * referenced here — the row has it; this file never renders or logs it.
- */
-import { logger } from "@working-theory/observability";
-import type { ProjectListing } from "@working-theory/validation";
-
-import { config } from "../config/index.js";
-import { prisma } from "../lib/prisma.js";
-
-const GITHUB_API_BASE = "https://api.github.com";
-const ISSUE_LABELS = ["status/ready"] as const;
-
-const SCOPE_PATHS = [
-  "apps/web/app/[locale]/projects/[slug]/**",
-  "apps/web/src/content/projects/**",
-  "apps/web/src/content/diagnostic/**",
-] as const;
-
-export type RenderListingIssueOptions = {
-  /** `owner/name` of the repo the issue is filed ON — the site's own repo, never this one. */
-  targetRepo: string;
-};
-
-export type RenderedListingIssue = {
-  title: string;
-  body: string;
-  labels: string[];
-};
-
-/**
- * Collapses an embedded line ending (CR and/or LF) to a space — see the
- * module doc's injection note — and strips backticks. Without stripping
- * backticks, a founder-authored value containing one (e.g. `` Bob` @someone ``)
- * closes `code()`'s single-backtick span early, leaving everything after it
- * as live, unfenced markdown GitHub WILL autolink into a real `@mention`
- * (PR #5011 security review, Finding 1) — the same failure mode `escapeMrkdwn`
- * exists to prevent for Slack, just triggered by a different delimiter.
- * A backtick is not meaningful content in any of these fields (a name, a
- * one-liner, a URL, …), so substituting a straight quote is a lossless-enough
- * trade for closing the injection outright, rather than computing a
- * CommonMark-safe variable-length fence.
- */
-function singleLine(value: string): string {
-  return value.replace(/[\r\n]+/g, " ").replace(/`/g, "'").trim();
-}
-
-/** What an absent field renders as. */
-const ABSENT = "—";
-
-/**
- * Inline code: verbatim AND immune to GitHub's `@mention`/`#issue` markdown
- * parsing.
- *
- * `null` is accepted because every application field became nullable at rest
- * in #5036 D1 — a half-filled draft is a legitimate row. An issue is only ever
- * filed from an APPROVED listing, which `submit` proved complete, so the null
- * branch discharges a type-level possibility rather than a reachable state.
- */
-function code(value: string | null): string {
-  return value === null ? ABSENT : `\`${singleLine(value)}\``;
-}
-
-/**
- * Renders the build-issue title/body/labels from an approved listing row.
- * Pure — every value comes from `listing` and `targetRepo`, nothing is read
- * from config or the network.
- */
-export function renderListingIssue(
-  listing: ProjectListing,
-  { targetRepo }: RenderListingIssueOptions,
-): RenderedListingIssue {
-  // `slug` is null only on a draft, and a draft never reaches this renderer.
-  const slug = listing.slug ?? listing.id;
-  const title = `feat(web): /projects/${slug} listing + diagnostic (listing ${listing.id})`;
-
-  const rowLines = [
-    `- id: ${code(listing.id)}`,
-    `- slug: ${code(listing.slug)}`,
-    `- name: ${code(listing.name)}`,
-    `- oneLiner: ${code(listing.oneLiner)}`,
-    `- problem: ${code(listing.problem)}`,
-    `- url: ${listing.url ? code(listing.url) : ABSENT}`,
-    `- product: ${code(listing.product)}`,
-    `- commitment: ${code(listing.commitment)}`,
-    `- teamComposition: ${code(listing.teamComposition)}`,
-    `- address: ${code(listing.address)}`,
-    `- anythingElse: ${listing.anythingElse ? code(listing.anythingElse) : ABSENT}`,
-    `- founderName: ${code(listing.founderName)}`,
-    `- founderCompany: ${listing.founderCompany ? code(listing.founderCompany) : ABSENT}`,
-  ].join("\n");
-
-  const questionsJson = JSON.stringify(listing.questions, null, 2);
-  // #5036 — the three FAQ entries the detail page renders. Emitted as FENCED
-  // JSON rather than as `- ` bullets, the same treatment `questions` already
-  // gets: `answer` is 1000 characters of anonymous free text with no
-  // control-character rule, and a bullet list is exactly the shape
-  // docs/lessons/project-listings/07 describes — anonymous text landing in a
-  // document a downstream tool parses by heading. Inside a fence it forges
-  // nothing.
-  const faqsJson = JSON.stringify(listing.faqs ?? [], null, 2);
-  const scopeLines = SCOPE_PATHS.map((p) => `- ${p}`).join("\n");
-
-  const body = `<!-- ailk-listing-issue: repo=${targetRepo} listing=${listing.id} -->
-
-## What
-
-Build the public listing page and its diagnostic flow for ${code(listing.name)}:
-
-- The page at \`/projects/${slug}\`, rendered from this row via the public read (\`GET /v1/project-listings/public\`).
-- The diagnostic at \`/flows/${slug}\`, registered from the flow generated on approve.
-
-**Row**
-
-${rowLines}
-
-**FAQs**
-
-\`\`\`\`json
-${faqsJson}
-\`\`\`\`
-
-**Questions**
-
-\`\`\`\`json
-${questionsJson}
-\`\`\`\`
-
-## Why
-
-An approved application must be a complete work order a worker can build from without the operator touching it again.
-
-## Acceptance Criteria
-
-- [ ] page renders from the row
-- [ ] diagnostic flow live at /flows/${slug}
-- [ ] waitlist joins land under the listing's experiment
-- [ ] /projects tile appears in the D6 order
-
-## Scope
-
-${scopeLines}
-
-## Grounding
-
-- **Governance:** \`internal\`
-- **Nature:** \`feature\`
-- **Resourced:** \`n/a\`
-
-<!-- dep-graph:
-  blocked-by:
-  blocks:
-  priority:
-  scope-paths: ${SCOPE_PATHS.join(", ")}
--->
-`;
-
-  return { title, body, labels: [...ISSUE_LABELS] };
-}
-
-/**
- * Files the build issue for an approved listing, writing `issueUrl` back on
- * success. No-op (`github-skipped`) when `AILK_GITHUB_REPO`/`AILK_GITHUB_TOKEN`
- * are absent, or when the row already carries `issueUrl` (idempotent — a
- * second approve, or a stray re-call, never double-files). Never throws: any
- * failure (network, non-201, a malformed response) is logged — id + status
- * only, never the token, never a response body that could carry one — and
- * the row is left with `issueUrl: null` for a later retry via the PATCH
- * route.
- */
-export async function fileListingIssue(listing: ProjectListing): Promise<void> {
-  const targetRepo = config.AILK_GITHUB_REPO;
-  const token = config.AILK_GITHUB_TOKEN;
-  if (!targetRepo || !token) {
-    logger.info({ listingId: listing.id }, "github-skipped");
-    return;
-  }
-  if (listing.issueUrl) {
-    return;
-  }
-
-  const { title, body, labels } = renderListingIssue(listing, { targetRepo });
-
-  try {
-    const res = await fetch(`${GITHUB_API_BASE}/repos/${targetRepo}/issues`, {
-      method: "POST",
-      headers: {
-        authorization: `Bearer ${token}`,
-        accept: "application/vnd.github+json",
-        "content-type": "application/json",
-        "X-GitHub-Api-Version": "2022-11-28",
-      },
-      body: JSON.stringify({ title, body, labels }),
-    });
-
-    if (res.status !== 201) {
-      logger.warn({ listingId: listing.id, status: res.status }, "listing issue filing failed");
-      return;
-    }
-
-    const json = (await res.json()) as { html_url?: unknown };
-    if (typeof json.html_url !== "string" || json.html_url.length === 0) {
-      logger.warn(
-        { listingId: listing.id, status: res.status },
-        "listing issue filing returned no html_url",
-      );
-      return;
-    }
-
-    await prisma.projectListing.update({
-      where: { id: listing.id },
-      data: { issueUrl: json.html_url },
-    });
-  } catch (err) {
-    logger.warn(
-      { listingId: listing.id, errName: err instanceof Error ? err.name : "UnknownError" },
-      "listing issue filing threw",
-    );
-  }
-}