create-ailk 0.2.0 → 0.3.0

package/templates/apps/api/src/services/__tests__/waitlist-followup.test.ts

@@ -1,567 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * @file waitlist-followup.test.ts
- * @description Unit tests for the waitlist follow-up-sequence sweep service
- * (#4732).
- *
- * External dependency boundaries mocked:
- *   - @working-theory/database (via moduleNameMapper → prisma-client.js mock; prisma singleton via __mocks__/prisma.ts)
- *   - @working-theory/email sendAbandonEmail + getResendClient
- *   - @working-theory/observability logger
- */
-
-// eslint-disable-next-line no-restricted-syntax -- prisma is a DB boundary; __mocks__/prisma.ts activates the auto-mock (Jest requires explicit call for local files)
-jest.mock("../../lib/prisma.js");
-
-const mockSendAbandonEmail = jest.fn();
-const mockContactsGet = jest.fn();
-jest.mock("@working-theory/email", () => ({
-  sendAbandonEmail: (...args: unknown[]) => mockSendAbandonEmail(...args),
-  getResendClient: () => ({ contacts: { get: (...args: unknown[]) => mockContactsGet(...args) } }),
-}));
-
-const mockLoggerInfo = jest.fn();
-const mockLoggerWarn = jest.fn();
-const mockLoggerError = jest.fn();
-jest.mock("@working-theory/observability", () => ({
-  logger: {
-    info: (...args: unknown[]) => mockLoggerInfo(...args),
-    warn: (...args: unknown[]) => mockLoggerWarn(...args),
-    error: (...args: unknown[]) => mockLoggerError(...args),
-    debug: jest.fn(),
-  },
-}));
-
-import { prisma } from "../../lib/prisma.js";
-import { runWaitlistFollowUpSweep } from "../waitlist-followup";
-
-// ─── Fixtures ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-const en = (s: string) => ({ en: s });
-
-const SITE_ID = "site-abc";
-const DEFINITION_ID = "flow_00000000-0000-7000-8000-0000000000f1";
-const NOW = new Date("2026-09-04T12:00:00.000Z");
-
-const FOLLOW_UP_ENTRY = {
-  key: "t_plus_3d_hot_warm",
-  offsetDays: 3,
-  tiers: ["hot", "warm"],
-  copy: {
-    subject: en("Ready to talk through your results?"),
-    body: en("Grab 20 minutes on our calendar."),
-  },
-  cta: { label: en("Book a walkthrough"), href: "https://example.com/book" },
-};
-
-// The full four-entry register (mirrors packages/validation's
-// ailk-founder-diagnostic.fixture.ts `followUps` export, D6) — used only by
-// the AC-3 multi-tier selection test below, which is the one test that needs
-// the cross-product of offsets and tiers to have any discriminating power.
-const FULL_FOLLOW_UPS_REGISTER = [
-  FOLLOW_UP_ENTRY, // t_plus_3d_hot_warm — offsetDays 3, tiers [hot, warm]
-  {
-    key: "t_plus_3d_product",
-    offsetDays: 3,
-    tiers: ["product"],
-    copy: {
-      subject: en("A closer look at your weakest dimension"),
-      body: en("Here's a deeper breakdown of the one area holding you back."),
-    },
-  },
-  {
-    key: "t_plus_10d",
-    offsetDays: 10,
-    tiers: ["hot", "warm", "product", "watching"],
-    copy: {
-      subject: en("What we're seeing across founder sites"),
-      body: en("A quick look at how sites like yours are scoring."),
-    },
-  },
-  {
-    key: "t_plus_21d",
-    offsetDays: 21,
-    tiers: ["hot", "warm"],
-    copy: {
-      subject: en("Still interested in fixing this?"),
-      body: en("The offer we mentioned is still open."),
-    },
-  },
-];
-
-function flowDefRow(overrides: Partial<{ followUps: unknown }> = {}) {
-  return {
-    id: DEFINITION_ID,
-    siteId: SITE_ID,
-    slug: "ailk-founder-diagnostic",
-    config: {
-      slug: "ailk-founder-diagnostic",
-      defaultLocale: "en",
-      steps: [
-        {
-          key: "contact",
-          type: "field",
-          copy: { title: en("Let's get started") },
-          fields: [
-            {
-              name: "email",
-              inputType: "email",
-              required: true,
-              mapsTo: "email",
-              copy: { label: en("Email") },
-            },
-          ],
-        },
-      ],
-      ...("followUps" in overrides
-        ? { followUps: overrides.followUps }
-        : { followUps: [FOLLOW_UP_ENTRY] }),
-    },
-  };
-}
-
-function sessionRow(overrides: Partial<Record<string, unknown>> = {}) {
-  return {
-    id: "flsess_00000000-0000-7000-8000-0000000000c1",
-    siteId: SITE_ID,
-    flowSlug: "ailk-founder-diagnostic",
-    leadId: "lead_00000000-0000-7000-8000-0000000000a1",
-    email: "lead@example.com",
-    locale: null,
-    completedAt: new Date("2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z"), // 3 days before NOW — due for offsetDays:3
-    ...overrides,
-  };
-}
-
-describe("runWaitlistFollowUpSweep", () => {
-  const originalEnv = process.env;
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    jest.clearAllMocks();
-    process.env = { ...originalEnv };
-    process.env.DATABASE_URL = "postgres://stub";
-    delete process.env.RESEND_AUDIENCE_ID;
-    process.env.AILK_FOLLOWUP_EMAIL_FROM = "followup@example.com";
-
-    mockSendAbandonEmail.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true, messageId: "msg-1" });
-    (prisma.flowDefinition.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue([flowDefRow()]);
-    (prisma.flowSession.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue([sessionRow()]);
-    (prisma.waitlistScore.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue([
-      { leadId: "lead_00000000-0000-7000-8000-0000000000a1", tier: "hot" },
-    ]);
-    (prisma.callback.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue([]);
-    (prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue([]);
-    (prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({ id: "wlfu_1" });
-  });
-
-  afterEach(() => {
-    process.env = originalEnv;
-  });
-
-  // ── DB required ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-  it("returns flows_not_configured when DATABASE_URL is unset", async () => {
-    delete process.env.DATABASE_URL;
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep();
-    expect(result).toEqual({
-      ok: false,
-      error: { kind: "flows_not_configured", message: expect.any(String) },
-    });
-    expect(prisma.flowDefinition.findMany).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  // ── AC-3 — due-tier send ─────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-  it("sends a due candidate whose tier matches the entry, through sendAbandonEmail, and stamps the send", async () => {
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!result.ok) return;
-    expect(result.summary.sent).toBe(1);
-    expect(result.summary.suppressed).toBe(0);
-    expect(result.summary.skipped).toBe(0);
-
-    expect(mockSendAbandonEmail).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
-      to: "lead@example.com",
-      fromAddress: "followup@example.com",
-      subject: "Ready to talk through your results?",
-      body: "Grab 20 minutes on our calendar.",
-      cta: "Book a walkthrough",
-      resumeLink: "https://example.com/book",
-    });
-
-    expect(prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
-      data: {
-        siteId: SITE_ID,
-        leadId: "lead_00000000-0000-7000-8000-0000000000a1",
-        followUpKey: "t_plus_3d_hot_warm",
-        sentAt: NOW,
-        status: "sent",
-      },
-    });
-  });
-
-  // ── code-review + acceptance-review round 1 finding: a concurrent
-  // overlapping sweep run racing the SAME (leadId, followUpKey) stamp must
-  // not abort the WHOLE sweep — only that one row's write raced ────────────
-
-  it("a P2002 unique-constraint violation on the stamp write (a concurrent overlapping run) is swallowed, logged, and does not abort the sweep", async () => {
-    (prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create as jest.Mock).mockRejectedValue(
-      Object.assign(new Error("Unique constraint failed"), { code: "P2002" }),
-    );
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!result.ok) return;
-    expect(result.summary.sent).toBe(1);
-
-    expect(mockLoggerWarn).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-      expect.objectContaining({ followUpKey: "t_plus_3d_hot_warm" }),
-      expect.stringContaining("P2002"),
-    );
-  });
-
-  it("any OTHER stamp-write error (not P2002) still propagates as unexpected_error", async () => {
-    (prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create as jest.Mock).mockRejectedValue(
-      new Error("connection reset"),
-    );
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result).toEqual({
-      ok: false,
-      error: { kind: "unexpected_error", message: "connection reset" },
-    });
-  });
-
-  it("stamps status:'failed' when sendAbandonEmail returns ok:false, and still counts it", async () => {
-    mockSendAbandonEmail.mockResolvedValue({
-      ok: false,
-      error: { kind: "send_failed", message: "Resend down" },
-    });
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!result.ok) return;
-    expect(result.summary.failed).toBe(1);
-    expect(result.summary.sent).toBe(0);
-
-    expect(prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-      expect.objectContaining({ data: expect.objectContaining({ status: "failed" }) }),
-    );
-  });
-
-  // ── AC-4 — wrong-tier skip ───────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-  it("skips a candidate whose tier is not in the entry's tiers[], with no send and no stamp", async () => {
-    (prisma.waitlistScore.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue([
-      { leadId: "lead_00000000-0000-7000-8000-0000000000a1", tier: "product" },
-    ]);
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!result.ok) return;
-    expect(result.summary.skipped).toBe(1);
-    expect(result.summary.sent).toBe(0);
-
-    expect(mockSendAbandonEmail).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(mockLoggerInfo).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-      expect.objectContaining({ outcome: "wrong_tier" }),
-      expect.any(String),
-    );
-  });
-
-  // ── AC-4 — not-yet-due skip ──────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-  it("skips a candidate whose completedAt + offsetDays > now, with no send and no stamp", async () => {
-    (prisma.flowSession.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue([
-      sessionRow({ completedAt: new Date("2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z") }), // 1 day before NOW — not yet due for offsetDays:3
-    ]);
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!result.ok) return;
-    expect(result.summary.skipped).toBe(1);
-    expect(result.summary.sent).toBe(0);
-
-    expect(mockSendAbandonEmail).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(mockLoggerInfo).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-      expect.objectContaining({ outcome: "not_due" }),
-      expect.any(String),
-    );
-  });
-
-  // ── AC-3 — idempotency: running twice sends zero additional emails ──────
-
-  it("running the sweep twice over the same fixtures sends zero additional emails the second time", async () => {
-    const first = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(first.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!first.ok) return;
-    expect(first.summary.sent).toBe(1);
-
-    // The second run's dedup query now reflects the first run's stamp.
-    (prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue([
-      { leadId: "lead_00000000-0000-7000-8000-0000000000a1" },
-    ]);
-    mockSendAbandonEmail.mockClear();
-
-    const second = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(second.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!second.ok) return;
-    expect(second.summary.sent).toBe(0);
-    expect(mockSendAbandonEmail).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  // ── AC-4 — Callback-suppressed skip ──────────────────────────────────────
-
-  it("skips a candidate whose email matches a Callback.payload.email (case-insensitive), with no send and no stamp", async () => {
-    (prisma.callback.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue([
-      { payload: { email: "LEAD@example.com" } },
-    ]);
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!result.ok) return;
-    expect(result.summary.suppressed).toBe(1);
-    expect(result.summary.sent).toBe(0);
-
-    expect(mockSendAbandonEmail).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(mockLoggerInfo).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-      expect.objectContaining({ outcome: "callback_suppressed" }),
-      expect.any(String),
-    );
-  });
-
-  // ── AC-4 — Resend-unsubscribed skip ──────────────────────────────────────
-
-  it("skips a candidate the mocked Resend Contacts client reports unsubscribed:true, with no send and no stamp", async () => {
-    process.env.RESEND_AUDIENCE_ID = "aud_123";
-    mockContactsGet.mockResolvedValue({
-      data: { id: "c1", email: "lead@example.com", unsubscribed: true },
-      error: null,
-    });
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!result.ok) return;
-    expect(result.summary.suppressed).toBe(1);
-    expect(result.summary.sent).toBe(0);
-
-    expect(mockContactsGet).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
-      email: "lead@example.com",
-      audienceId: "aud_123",
-    });
-    expect(mockSendAbandonEmail).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(mockLoggerInfo).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-      expect.objectContaining({ outcome: "unsubscribed" }),
-      expect.any(String),
-    );
-  });
-
-  it("a 404/not-found Resend Contacts response is treated as NOT unsubscribed — the send proceeds", async () => {
-    process.env.RESEND_AUDIENCE_ID = "aud_123";
-    mockContactsGet.mockResolvedValue({
-      data: null,
-      error: { statusCode: 404, message: "not_found", name: "not_found" },
-    });
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!result.ok) return;
-    expect(result.summary.sent).toBe(1);
-    expect(mockSendAbandonEmail).toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  it("any other Resend Contacts API error skips the send this run WITHOUT stamping", async () => {
-    process.env.RESEND_AUDIENCE_ID = "aud_123";
-    mockContactsGet.mockResolvedValue({
-      data: null,
-      error: { statusCode: 500, message: "internal_error", name: "internal_server_error" },
-    });
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!result.ok) return;
-    expect(result.summary.sent).toBe(0);
-    expect(result.summary.skipped).toBe(1);
-    expect(mockSendAbandonEmail).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  // ── AC-5 — RESEND_AUDIENCE_ID unset → proceeds, guarded BEFORE the call ──
-
-  it("with RESEND_AUDIENCE_ID unset, sends a due, otherwise non-suppressed candidate without ever calling contacts.get at all", async () => {
-    expect(process.env.RESEND_AUDIENCE_ID).toBeUndefined();
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!result.ok) return;
-    expect(result.summary.sent).toBe(1);
-
-    expect(mockContactsGet).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  // ── D5 — malformed stored config → skip-and-log, never throws ───────────
-
-  it("skips a flow whose stored config fails schema validation, logging a warning, without aborting the sweep", async () => {
-    (prisma.flowDefinition.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue([
-      { id: DEFINITION_ID, siteId: SITE_ID, slug: "broken-flow", config: { not: "a valid flow config" } },
-    ]);
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!result.ok) return;
-    expect(result.summary.sent).toBe(0);
-    expect(mockLoggerWarn).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-      expect.objectContaining({ siteId: SITE_ID, flowSlug: "broken-flow" }),
-      expect.stringContaining("failed schema validation"),
-    );
-    expect(prisma.flowSession.findMany).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  it("never selects a session on a flow with no followUps block", async () => {
-    (prisma.flowDefinition.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue([
-      flowDefRow({ followUps: undefined }),
-    ]);
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!result.ok) return;
-    expect(result.summary.scanned).toBe(0);
-    expect(prisma.flowSession.findMany).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  // ── sender_unconfigured — env gap must not consume the one send ─────────
-
-  it("leaves the candidate unstamped when no from-address is configured", async () => {
-    delete process.env.AILK_FOLLOWUP_EMAIL_FROM;
-    delete process.env.AILK_LEAD_NOTIFICATION_FROM;
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-    if (!result.ok) return;
-    expect(result.summary.skipped).toBe(1);
-    expect(mockSendAbandonEmail).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  // ── unexpected mid-run failure degrades to a structured error ───────────
-
-  it("returns unexpected_error and logs the partial summary on a mid-sweep throw", async () => {
-    (prisma.flowSession.findMany as jest.Mock).mockRejectedValue(new Error("db down"));
-
-    const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-    expect(result).toEqual({
-      ok: false,
-      error: { kind: "unexpected_error", message: "db down" },
-    });
-    expect(mockLoggerError).toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  // ── AC-3 — multi-tier, multi-entry selection (acceptance-review round 1
-  // finding: a single-entry, single-tier fixture cannot demonstrate the
-  // cross-product of offsets and tiers actually composes correctly) ───────
-
-  describe("multi-tier selection over the full four-entry register", () => {
-    const LEAD_HOT = "lead_00000000-0000-7000-8000-00000000000h";
-    const LEAD_WARM = "lead_00000000-0000-7000-8000-00000000000w";
-    const LEAD_PRODUCT = "lead_00000000-0000-7000-8000-00000000000p";
-    const LEAD_WATCHING = "lead_00000000-0000-7000-8000-00000000000v";
-
-    function daysAgo(n: number): Date {
-      return new Date(NOW.getTime() - n * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000);
-    }
-
-    function multiTierSessions() {
-      return [
-        sessionRow({ leadId: LEAD_HOT, email: "hot@example.com", completedAt: daysAgo(25) }),
-        sessionRow({ leadId: LEAD_WARM, email: "warm@example.com", completedAt: daysAgo(12) }),
-        sessionRow({ leadId: LEAD_PRODUCT, email: "product@example.com", completedAt: daysAgo(5) }),
-        sessionRow({ leadId: LEAD_WATCHING, email: "watching@example.com", completedAt: daysAgo(1) }),
-      ];
-    }
-
-    // The exact expected (leadId, followUpKey) pairs, derived by hand from
-    // FULL_FOLLOW_UPS_REGISTER × the four completedAt offsets above — see
-    // the acceptance-review recipe: due (offsetDays elapsed) AND tier ∈
-    // entry.tiers, both terms required.
-    //   hot      (25d ago): due for 3/10/21, tier hot ∈ every entry's tiers → 3 sends
-    //   warm     (12d ago): due for 3/10, NOT 21; tier warm ∈ both due entries → 2 sends
-    //   product  (5d ago):  due for 3 only; tier product ∈ t_plus_3d_product only → 1 send
-    //   watching (1d ago):  due for none (min offset is 3) → 0 sends
-    const EXPECTED_PAIRS = [
-      { leadId: LEAD_HOT, followUpKey: "t_plus_3d_hot_warm" },
-      { leadId: LEAD_HOT, followUpKey: "t_plus_10d" },
-      { leadId: LEAD_HOT, followUpKey: "t_plus_21d" },
-      { leadId: LEAD_WARM, followUpKey: "t_plus_3d_hot_warm" },
-      { leadId: LEAD_WARM, followUpKey: "t_plus_10d" },
-      { leadId: LEAD_PRODUCT, followUpKey: "t_plus_3d_product" },
-    ];
-
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      (prisma.flowDefinition.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue([
-        flowDefRow({ followUps: FULL_FOLLOW_UPS_REGISTER }),
-      ]);
-      (prisma.flowSession.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(multiTierSessions());
-      (prisma.waitlistScore.findMany as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue([
-        { leadId: LEAD_HOT, tier: "hot" },
-        { leadId: LEAD_WARM, tier: "warm" },
-        { leadId: LEAD_PRODUCT, tier: "product" },
-        { leadId: LEAD_WATCHING, tier: "watching" },
-      ]);
-    });
-
-    it("sends exactly the due (lead, followUpKey) pairs across all four tiers and all four register entries — not merely a matching count", async () => {
-      const result = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-      expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
-      if (!result.ok) return;
-
-      expect(result.summary.sent).toBe(EXPECTED_PAIRS.length);
-      expect(mockSendAbandonEmail).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(EXPECTED_PAIRS.length);
-
-      const actualPairs = (prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create as jest.Mock).mock.calls.map(
-        ([{ data }]: [{ data: { leadId: string; followUpKey: string } }]) => ({
-          leadId: data.leadId,
-          followUpKey: data.followUpKey,
-        }),
-      );
-      // Set-equality, order-independent: every expected pair present, no
-      // extra pair beyond the expected set (a wrong cross-product selection
-      // — e.g. LEAD_WATCHING receiving anything, or LEAD_WARM receiving
-      // t_plus_21d — fails this even when the total count happens to match).
-      expect(actualPairs).toHaveLength(EXPECTED_PAIRS.length);
-      for (const expected of EXPECTED_PAIRS) {
-        expect(actualPairs).toContainEqual(expected);
-      }
-    });
-
-    it("running the sweep again — with per-key stamps from the first run — sends zero additional emails", async () => {
-      const first = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-      expect(first.ok).toBe(true);
-      if (!first.ok) return;
-      expect(first.summary.sent).toBe(EXPECTED_PAIRS.length);
-
-      // Per-key stamps: findMany({ where: { followUpKey, leadId: {in} } })
-      // must return only the leads already stamped for THAT key — a mock
-      // returning the same leadId set for every key (as the round-1 test
-      // did) cannot discriminate once more than one entry exists.
-      (prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.findMany as jest.Mock).mockImplementation(
-        async ({ where }: { where: { followUpKey: string } }) =>
-          EXPECTED_PAIRS.filter((p) => p.followUpKey === where.followUpKey).map((p) => ({
-            leadId: p.leadId,
-          })),
-      );
-      mockSendAbandonEmail.mockClear();
-      (prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create as jest.Mock).mockClear();
-
-      const second = await runWaitlistFollowUpSweep({ now: NOW });
-      expect(second.ok).toBe(true);
-      if (!second.ok) return;
-      expect(second.summary.sent).toBe(0);
-      expect(mockSendAbandonEmail).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-      expect(prisma.waitlistFollowUpSend.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    });
-  });
-});