create-ailk 0.1.1 → 0.3.0

package/templates/apps/api/src/services/__tests__/waitlist-scoring.test.ts

@@ -1,474 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * @file waitlist-scoring.test.ts
- * @description Unit tests for the waitlist-scoring glue service (#4662 D6).
- *
- * External dependency boundary mocked: @working-theory/database (auto-mock
- * via `../../lib/__mocks__/prisma.ts`, mirroring waitlist-experiments.test.ts).
- * `@working-theory/observability`'s logger is mocked to a spyable stub
- * (mirrors deliverable-fulfillment.test.ts / abandon-email.test.ts) so the
- * PII-safety of the error logs is directly assertable.
- *
- * `@working-theory/validation`'s `evaluateWaitlistScoring` is a PARTIAL mock
- * (every other export runs real, incl. `waitlistExperimentConfigSchema` and
- * `answersFromPayload`) — every one of the pure evaluator's own defensive
- * throws (unresolvable ref/score/sum term, a ref cycle) is on a register
- * shape `waitlistExperimentConfigSchema`'s own superRefine already rejects
- * (waitlist-scoring.test.ts, packages/validation, covers those exhaustively
- * against a register that bypasses the schema entirely). So the ONLY way to
- * observe this glue's `evaluation_failed` outcome against a schema-VALID
- * config is to make the (already schema-validated, already unit-tested)
- * evaluator itself throw for one call — not to hand-craft an "invalid but
- * schema-valid" register, which cannot exist by construction.
- */
-// eslint-disable-next-line no-restricted-syntax -- prisma is a DB boundary; __mocks__/prisma.ts activates the auto-mock (Jest requires explicit call for local files)
-jest.mock("../../lib/prisma.js");
-
-const mockLoggerError = jest.fn();
-jest.mock("@working-theory/observability", () => ({
-  logger: {
-    info: jest.fn(),
-    warn: jest.fn(),
-    error: (...args: unknown[]) => mockLoggerError(...args),
-    debug: jest.fn(),
-  },
-}));
-
-jest.mock("@working-theory/validation", () => {
-  const actual = jest.requireActual("@working-theory/validation");
-  return { ...actual, evaluateWaitlistScoring: jest.fn(actual.evaluateWaitlistScoring) };
-});
-
-import { evaluateWaitlistScoring } from "@working-theory/validation";
-
-import { prisma } from "../../lib/prisma.js";
-import { scoreCompletedSignup } from "../waitlist-scoring";
-
-const en = (s: string) => ({ en: s });
-const SITE_ID = "site-abc";
-const LEAD_ID = "lead-1";
-const EXPERIMENT_KEY = "my-experiment";
-const WAITLIST_KEY = "main";
-
-beforeEach(() => {
-  jest.clearAllMocks();
-});
-
-function noScoringConfig() {
-  return {
-    key: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-    mode: "lead-capture" as const,
-    status: "draft" as const,
-    waitlists: [{ key: WAITLIST_KEY, flowSlug: EXPERIMENT_KEY }],
-    questionSet: {
-      version: 1 as const,
-      questions: [
-        {
-          id: "email",
-          prompt: en("Your email"),
-          answerType: "email" as const,
-          mapsTo: "email" as const,
-        },
-      ],
-    },
-    tracking: {
-      version: 1 as const,
-      utm: { source: "utm_source", medium: "utm_medium", campaign: "utm_campaign" },
-      waitlists: { [WAITLIST_KEY]: { campaign: "launch", channels: ["organic"] } },
-    },
-    stripeConfigRef: null,
-  };
-}
-
-function validQualifyingConfig() {
-  return {
-    key: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-    mode: "qualifying" as const,
-    status: "draft" as const,
-    waitlists: [{ key: WAITLIST_KEY, flowSlug: EXPERIMENT_KEY }],
-    questionSet: {
-      version: 1 as const,
-      questions: [
-        {
-          id: "email",
-          prompt: en("Your email"),
-          answerType: "email" as const,
-          mapsTo: "email" as const,
-        },
-        {
-          id: "budget",
-          prompt: en("What's your budget?"),
-          answerType: "single" as const,
-          options: [
-            { value: "small", label: en("Small") },
-            { value: "large", label: en("Large") },
-          ],
-        },
-      ],
-    },
-    scoring: {
-      version: 1 as const,
-      points: [
-        {
-          name: "budget_points",
-          question: "budget",
-          kind: "optionWeights" as const,
-          weights: { small: 1, large: 10 },
-        },
-      ],
-      scores: { total: { sum: ["budget_points"] } },
-      tiers: [{ key: "hot", when: { score: "total", gte: 5 } }],
-      default: "hot",
-    },
-    tracking: {
-      version: 1 as const,
-      utm: { source: "utm_source", medium: "utm_medium", campaign: "utm_campaign" },
-      waitlists: { [WAITLIST_KEY]: { campaign: "launch", channels: ["organic"] } },
-    },
-    stripeConfigRef: null,
-  };
-}
-
-describe("scoreCompletedSignup (D6)", () => {
-  it("no experiment row ⇒ skipped: no_experiment, no upsert", async () => {
-    (prisma.waitlistExperiment.findUnique as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(null);
-
-    const result = await scoreCompletedSignup({
-      siteId: SITE_ID,
-      leadId: LEAD_ID,
-      experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-      waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-      payload: {},
-    });
-
-    expect(result).toEqual({ ok: true, skipped: "no_experiment" });
-    expect(prisma.waitlistScore.upsert).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  it("a config with no scoring block ⇒ skipped: no_scoring, no upsert (a lead-capture experiment)", async () => {
-    (prisma.waitlistExperiment.findUnique as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
-      config: noScoringConfig(),
-    });
-
-    const result = await scoreCompletedSignup({
-      siteId: SITE_ID,
-      leadId: LEAD_ID,
-      experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-      waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-      payload: {},
-    });
-
-    expect(result).toEqual({ ok: true, skipped: "no_scoring" });
-    expect(prisma.waitlistScore.upsert).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  it("an invalid stored config (defensive — the row was validated on write) ⇒ invalid_config, no upsert", async () => {
-    (prisma.waitlistExperiment.findUnique as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
-      config: { not: "a config" },
-    });
-
-    const result = await scoreCompletedSignup({
-      siteId: SITE_ID,
-      leadId: LEAD_ID,
-      experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-      waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-      payload: {},
-    });
-
-    expect(result).toEqual({ ok: false, error: { kind: "invalid_config" } });
-    expect(prisma.waitlistScore.upsert).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  it("a valid qualifying config ⇒ exactly one upsert on {leadId, experimentKey} carrying the evaluator's output", async () => {
-    (prisma.waitlistExperiment.findUnique as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
-      config: validQualifyingConfig(),
-    });
-    (prisma.waitlistScore.upsert as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({ id: "wlscore_1" });
-
-    const result = await scoreCompletedSignup({
-      siteId: SITE_ID,
-      leadId: LEAD_ID,
-      experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-      waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-      payload: { budget: "large" },
-    });
-
-    expect(result).toEqual({ ok: true, tier: "hot" });
-    expect(prisma.waitlistScore.upsert).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
-    expect(prisma.waitlistScore.upsert).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-      expect.objectContaining({
-        // The composite key since #5036 D6d — `{ leadId }` alone scoped one
-        // score per LEAD, which silently erased a founder's evidence the
-        // moment a visitor joined a second listing's waitlist.
-        where: { leadId_experimentKey: { leadId: LEAD_ID, experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY } },
-        create: expect.objectContaining({
-          siteId: SITE_ID,
-          leadId: LEAD_ID,
-          experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-          waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-          tier: "hot",
-          score: 10,
-          categoryScores: { total: 10 },
-        }),
-        update: expect.objectContaining({
-          tier: "hot",
-          score: 10,
-          categoryScores: { total: 10 },
-        }),
-      }),
-    );
-  });
-
-  it("a second call on the same lead re-scores via the same upsert call — update, never a second row", async () => {
-    (prisma.waitlistExperiment.findUnique as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
-      config: validQualifyingConfig(),
-    });
-    (prisma.waitlistScore.upsert as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({ id: "wlscore_1" });
-
-    await scoreCompletedSignup({
-      siteId: SITE_ID,
-      leadId: LEAD_ID,
-      experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-      waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-      payload: { budget: "large" },
-    });
-    await scoreCompletedSignup({
-      siteId: SITE_ID,
-      leadId: LEAD_ID,
-      experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-      waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-      payload: { budget: "small" },
-    });
-
-    expect(prisma.waitlistScore.upsert).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
-    const calls = (prisma.waitlistScore.upsert as jest.Mock).mock.calls;
-    // Same lead, same experiment ⇒ the SAME composite key both times, so the
-    // second write lands as an update. Re-scoring overwriting is the intended
-    // behaviour; #5036 D6d only scoped it per experiment, it did not remove it.
-    const key = { leadId_experimentKey: { leadId: LEAD_ID, experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY } };
-    expect(calls[0]![0]).toMatchObject({ where: key });
-    expect(calls[1]![0]).toMatchObject({ where: key });
-  });
-
-  // ── #5036 D6d — one lead, two experiments, two surviving rows ───────────
-
-  /**
-   * The correctness defect D6d straightened, asserted from the outside.
-   *
-   * `WaitlistScore` carried `@@unique([leadId])` — "one row per lead". Right
-   * for a single instrument, wrong for a marketplace of them: a visitor who
-   * joins two founders' waitlists is one lead with TWO scores, and under
-   * `where: { leadId }` the second upsert resolved the SAME row as the first
-   * and overwrote it. One founder's evidence vanished into a CSV that
-   * reported fewer signups than actually happened, with no error raised
-   * anywhere.
-   *
-   * What makes the two rows survive is that the two writes address DIFFERENT
-   * keys, so this test asserts exactly that and nothing about Prisma's own
-   * upsert semantics.
-   */
-  it("scores one lead against two experiments — the two upserts carry DIFFERENT keys, so neither can overwrite the other", async () => {
-    (prisma.waitlistExperiment.findUnique as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
-      config: validQualifyingConfig(),
-    });
-    (prisma.waitlistScore.upsert as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({ id: "wlscore_1" });
-
-    for (const experimentKey of ["exp-a", "exp-b"]) {
-      await scoreCompletedSignup({
-        siteId: SITE_ID,
-        leadId: LEAD_ID,
-        experimentKey,
-        waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-        payload: { budget: "large" },
-      });
-    }
-
-    expect(prisma.waitlistScore.upsert).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
-    const [first, second] = (prisma.waitlistScore.upsert as jest.Mock).mock.calls.map(
-      (call) => call[0] as { where: unknown },
-    );
-
-    expect(first!.where).toEqual({
-      leadId_experimentKey: { leadId: LEAD_ID, experimentKey: "exp-a" },
-    });
-    expect(second!.where).toEqual({
-      leadId_experimentKey: { leadId: LEAD_ID, experimentKey: "exp-b" },
-    });
-    // The load-bearing assertion: two distinct addresses, so the second write
-    // cannot resolve the first row. Under the old `where: { leadId }` both of
-    // these were `{ leadId: "lead-1" }` and this comparison would be equal.
-    expect(first!.where).not.toEqual(second!.where);
-  });
-
-  it("an evaluator throw ⇒ evaluation_failed, no upsert", async () => {
-    // The evaluator's own defensive throws (WaitlistEvaluationError, for an
-    // unresolvable ref/score/sum term or a ref cycle) are exhaustively
-    // covered against a register that bypasses the schema, in
-    // packages/validation/src/schemas/__tests__/waitlist-scoring.test.ts — a
-    // schema-VALID config cannot reach any of them (waitlistExperimentConfigSchema's
-    // own superRefine already rejects every such shape). So this glue-level
-    // test forces the (real, unit-tested) evaluator to throw for one call,
-    // to prove the glue's own catch → `evaluation_failed` → no upsert path.
-    (evaluateWaitlistScoring as jest.Mock).mockImplementationOnce(() => {
-      throw new Error("boom");
-    });
-    (prisma.waitlistExperiment.findUnique as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
-      config: validQualifyingConfig(),
-    });
-
-    const result = await scoreCompletedSignup({
-      siteId: SITE_ID,
-      leadId: LEAD_ID,
-      experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-      waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-      payload: { budget: "large" },
-    });
-
-    expect(result).toEqual({ ok: false, error: { kind: "evaluation_failed" } });
-    expect(prisma.waitlistScore.upsert).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  it("a persist (Prisma) failure ⇒ persist_failed", async () => {
-    (prisma.waitlistExperiment.findUnique as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
-      config: validQualifyingConfig(),
-    });
-    (prisma.waitlistScore.upsert as jest.Mock).mockRejectedValue(new Error("db down"));
-
-    const result = await scoreCompletedSignup({
-      siteId: SITE_ID,
-      leadId: LEAD_ID,
-      experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-      waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-      payload: { budget: "large" },
-    });
-
-    expect(result).toEqual({ ok: false, error: { kind: "persist_failed" } });
-  });
-
-  it("the log line carries no answer value — PII-safe outcome logs only", async () => {
-    (evaluateWaitlistScoring as jest.Mock).mockImplementationOnce(() => {
-      throw new Error("boom");
-    });
-    (prisma.waitlistExperiment.findUnique as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
-      config: validQualifyingConfig(),
-    });
-
-    await scoreCompletedSignup({
-      siteId: SITE_ID,
-      leadId: LEAD_ID,
-      experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-      waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-      payload: { budget: "large" },
-    });
-
-    expect(mockLoggerError).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-      expect.objectContaining({
-        siteId: SITE_ID,
-        experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-        leadId: LEAD_ID,
-        kind: "evaluation_failed",
-      }),
-      expect.any(String),
-    );
-    const [logMeta] = mockLoggerError.mock.calls[0]!;
-    expect(JSON.stringify(logMeta)).not.toContain("large");
-    expect(JSON.stringify(logMeta)).not.toContain("budget");
-  });
-});
-
-describe("scoreCompletedSignup — FEAT-074 U4a playbook compile hook (#4715)", () => {
-  // Exercises the REAL compileAndStorePlaybook (no jest.mock of the internal
-  // module — CONTRIBUTING.md § Test code quality / #507 forbids mocking an
-  // internal module; the real boundary is prisma + observability, both
-  // already mocked above). The tier must be a real `level_N` the VENDORED
-  // library declares (Level 1) so the real compile succeeds — this mirrors
-  // validQualifyingConfig()'s own register shape, only its tiers/default
-  // differ, so it stays a minimal diff from the existing fixture.
-  const TARGETING_MATURITY_KEY = "targeting-maturity";
-
-  function targetingMaturityConfig() {
-    const base = validQualifyingConfig();
-    return {
-      ...base,
-      key: TARGETING_MATURITY_KEY,
-      scoring: {
-        ...base.scoring,
-        tiers: [{ key: "level_1", when: { score: "total", gte: 0 } }],
-        default: "level_1",
-      },
-    };
-  }
-
-  it("experimentKey === targeting-maturity ⇒ a PlaybookInstance row is created from the upserted score's id and tier (AC-3)", async () => {
-    (prisma.waitlistExperiment.findUnique as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
-      config: targetingMaturityConfig(),
-    });
-    (prisma.waitlistScore.upsert as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({ id: "wlscore_playbook_1" });
-    (prisma.playbookInstance.create as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({ id: "pbk_1" });
-
-    const result = await scoreCompletedSignup({
-      siteId: SITE_ID,
-      leadId: LEAD_ID,
-      experimentKey: TARGETING_MATURITY_KEY,
-      waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-      payload: { budget: "large" },
-    });
-
-    expect(result).toEqual({ ok: true, tier: "level_1" });
-    expect(prisma.playbookInstance.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
-    const [call] = (prisma.playbookInstance.create as jest.Mock).mock.calls[0]!;
-    expect(call.data).toMatchObject({
-      siteId: SITE_ID,
-      leadId: LEAD_ID,
-      experimentKey: TARGETING_MATURITY_KEY,
-      scoreId: "wlscore_playbook_1",
-      tier: "level_1",
-      level: 1,
-    });
-  });
-
-  it("any other experimentKey ⇒ no PlaybookInstance row is created", async () => {
-    (prisma.waitlistExperiment.findUnique as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
-      config: validQualifyingConfig(),
-    });
-    (prisma.waitlistScore.upsert as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({ id: "wlscore_1" });
-
-    const result = await scoreCompletedSignup({
-      siteId: SITE_ID,
-      leadId: LEAD_ID,
-      experimentKey: EXPERIMENT_KEY,
-      waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-      payload: { budget: "large" },
-    });
-
-    expect(result).toEqual({ ok: true, tier: "hot" });
-    expect(prisma.playbookInstance.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  it("a compile/store failure leaves the score intact — scoreCompletedSignup still resolves ok:true, never throws to its caller (AC-4)", async () => {
-    (prisma.waitlistExperiment.findUnique as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
-      config: targetingMaturityConfig(),
-    });
-    (prisma.waitlistScore.upsert as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({ id: "wlscore_playbook_2" });
-    (prisma.playbookInstance.create as jest.Mock).mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error("db down"));
-
-    const result = await scoreCompletedSignup({
-      siteId: SITE_ID,
-      leadId: LEAD_ID,
-      experimentKey: TARGETING_MATURITY_KEY,
-      waitlistKey: WAITLIST_KEY,
-      payload: { budget: "large" },
-    });
-
-    expect(result).toEqual({ ok: true, tier: "level_1" });
-    expect(prisma.waitlistScore.upsert).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
-    expect(mockLoggerError).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-      expect.objectContaining({
-        siteId: SITE_ID,
-        experimentKey: TARGETING_MATURITY_KEY,
-        leadId: LEAD_ID,
-        kind: "playbook_compile_failed",
-      }),
-      expect.any(String),
-    );
-  });
-});