commandmate 0.44.2 → 0.44.3

package/dist/server/src/lib/detection/selection-shape.js

@@ -64,19 +64,15 @@
  * written once.
  */
 Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
-exports.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_FOOTER = exports.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_ROW = exports.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_FOOTER = exports.DISMISSABLE_PANEL_FOOTER_PATTERN = exports.COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST_FOOTER = exports.SET_AS_DEFAULT_FOOTER_PATTERN = exports.SESSION_SCOPE_FOOTER_PATTERN = exports.MAX_OPTION_NUMBER = exports.SELECTION_SHAPE_TAIL_LINE_COUNT = void 0;
-exports.isCommandCodePlanApproveChoice = isCommandCodePlanApproveChoice;
-exports.hasCommandCodeSelectionListFooterAtBottom = hasCommandCodeSelectionListFooterAtBottom;
-exports.hasCommandCodeDismissablePanelFooterAtBottom = hasCommandCodeDismissablePanelFooterAtBottom;
-exports.hasCommandCodePlanReviewFooterAtBottom = hasCommandCodePlanReviewFooterAtBottom;
-exports.hasDismissablePanelFooter = hasDismissablePanelFooter;
+exports.readCommandCodeReviewPage = exports.isCommandCodePlanApproveChoice = exports.hasDismissablePanelFooter = exports.hasCommandCodeSelectionListFooterAtBottom = exports.hasCommandCodePlanReviewFooterAtBottom = exports.hasCommandCodeDismissablePanelFooterAtBottom = exports.DISMISSABLE_PANEL_FOOTER_PATTERN = exports.COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST_FOOTER = exports.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_ROW = exports.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_FOOTER = exports.SET_AS_DEFAULT_FOOTER_PATTERN = exports.SESSION_SCOPE_FOOTER_PATTERN = exports.MAX_OPTION_NUMBER = exports.SELECTION_SHAPE_TAIL_LINE_COUNT = exports.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_FOOTER = void 0;
 exports.readCommandCodeQuestionRegion = readCommandCodeQuestionRegion;
 exports.hasCommandCodeQuestionChrome = hasCommandCodeQuestionChrome;
-exports.readCommandCodeReviewPage = readCommandCodeReviewPage;
 exports.extractCommandCodeSelectionListFrame = extractCommandCodeSelectionListFrame;
 exports.readSelectionListShape = readSelectionListShape;
 exports.shouldOfferOptionNumbers = shouldOfferOptionNumbers;
 const ansi_1 = require("./ansi");
+const selection_shape_patterns_1 = require("./selection-shape-patterns");
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_FOOTER", { enumerable: true, get: function () { return selection_shape_patterns_1.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_FOOTER; } });
 /**
  * How many rows up from the last content row the shape is read.
  *
@@ -91,6 +87,10 @@ const ansi_1 = require("./ansi");
  * Bounded rather than unbounded because the alternative reads the transcript: a
  * markdown answer that happens to contain `1.` / `2.` sits hundreds of rows
  * above the dialog on a 200x1000 pane and must not be counted as options.
+ *
+ * Forty rows is still wider than an inline tool's dialog, so the number KEYS
+ * are not decided off this tail alone: `readSelectionListFrame` also counts on
+ * the rows the dialog card draws and takes the smaller (Issue #3336).
  */
 exports.SELECTION_SHAPE_TAIL_LINE_COUNT = 40;
 /** Highest option number a single keystroke can deliver (`10` is two keys). */
@@ -125,401 +125,18 @@ exports.SESSION_SCOPE_FOOTER_PATTERN = /\bs\s+to\s+use\s+this\s+session\s+only\b
  * claude's wording for a screen that may not carry it.
  */
 exports.SET_AS_DEFAULT_FOOTER_PATTERN = /\bEnter\s+to\s+set\s+as\s+default\b/i;
-/**
- * A focused search/filter row inside the dialog.
- *
- * Three measured spellings, and nothing wider — this predicate SUPPRESSES a
- * control, so a false positive costs the user their number buttons:
- *  - `Type to search models...` / `type to search` (Command Code 1.40.1);
- *  - `Search models…` (copilot 1.0.80's `/model`, recorded verbatim in
- *    `cli-patterns.ts`'s `COPILOT_SELECTION_FOOTER_PATTERN` docblock);
- *  - `/ search` (copilot's `/session` and `/settings` footers).
- *
- * Deliberately does NOT match claude's `/model` blurb ("Switch between Claude
- * models…") or codex's ("Access legacy models by running codex -m…"), neither of
- * which contains the word.
- */
-const FILTER_INPUT_PATTERN = /\btype\s+to\s+search\b|\bsearch\s+\w+\s*(?:…|\.\.\.)|(?:^|·)\s*\/\s+search\b/im;
-/**
- * Command Code's picker footer (v1.40.1, measured at 200x1000 for Issue #2297).
- *
- *     type to search · ↑/↓ navigate · shift+↑/↓ jump provider · enter to select · esc to cancel
- *
- * Before this Issue no detector branch matched it, so the overlay fell through
- * to the `default` floor and the chat surface raised its `unclassified` card —
- * whose controls are the `1`–`9` / `y` / `n` answer keys, every one of which
- * would have been typed into that `Type to search models...` box. The
- * command-code detector imports this and answers
- * `STATUS_REASON.COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST` instead, which puts the arrow pad
- * on the card.
- *
- * Lower case is what Command Code draws, and the `·` separator keeps the pattern
- * off ordinary prose — the same two narrowings `COPILOT_SELECTION_FOOTER_PATTERN`
- * settled on for the same reason.
- */
-exports.COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST_FOOTER = /\benter\s+to\s+select\b\s*[·•]\s*esc\s+to\s+cancel\b/i;
-/**
- * The footer of an overlay whose ONLY exit is the dismiss (Issue #2369).
- *
- * Measured on Command Code 1.49's `/usage`, whose last row is verbatim
- * `Press Esc to close`. The panel above it is read-only — a plan header, two
- * meters, a breakdown URL — so there is no highlight to move and no key to
- * confirm with. Before this pattern existed nothing matched the screen, it
- * reached the `default` floor, and the chat surface answered an
- * eighteen-button `unclassified` card to a panel with one working key.
- *
- * ## Why it is this narrow
- *
- * Three narrowings, and each one is there because this predicate SUPPRESSES
- * controls — a false positive takes the arrow pad and the answer keys away from
- * a screen that needed them:
- *
- *  - **a verb before the key.** `Press`/`Hit`/`Type`, or nothing at all, but not
- *    an arbitrary run of prose. `esc to cancel` on its own is the tail of every
- *    picker footer in this file, including
- *    {@link COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST_FOOTER}, and those screens have a
- *    highlight;
- *  - **`close`/`dismiss`/`exit`, never `cancel` or `go back`.** The distinction
- *    is measured rather than stylistic: `cancel` is what a screen with a
- *    COMMITTABLE choice calls its escape (claude's `/model`, codex's picker,
- *    Command Code's own), while `close` is what a panel that decided nothing
- *    calls it;
- *  - **the whole row.** Anchored at both ends (leading/trailing space aside), so
- *    a hint bar that offers a dismiss ALONGSIDE something else — `↑/↓ navigate ·
- *    enter to select · esc to close` — does not match, and keeps the arrows the
- *    other half of its sentence promises.
- *
- * Case-insensitive because the measured row is `Press Esc to close` and Command
- * Code writes its picker hints in lower case; nothing rests on which it uses.
- */
-exports.DISMISSABLE_PANEL_FOOTER_PATTERN = /^\s*(?:press|hit|type)?\s*(?:<)?esc(?:ape)?(?:>)?\s+to\s+(?:close|dismiss|exit)\b[\s.·•]*$/im;
-/**
- * The two footer rows of Command Code's plan review overlay (Issue #2761).
- *
- * Measured on 1.58.0 at 200x1000. The overlay is a rule, a `Plan review: <title>
- * · <path> · v1` header, the plan with a line-number gutter, a second rule, a
- * ` REVIEW ` badge and then, verbatim:
- *
- *     Approve ctrl+a   executes the plan
- *     Cancel esc
- *
- * BOTH rows, adjacent, because each half alone is weak: `Cancel esc` is two
- * words any picker might print, and `Approve` is a word an agent writes in a
- * plan. Multi-line on purpose — it is tested against a joined tail
- * (`NormalizedFrame.lastLines`, or the tail {@link readSelectionListShape}
- * builds), never against a single row.
- *
- * Swept against every fixture in `tests/fixtures` and
- * `tests/unit/lib/detection/fixtures` when this was written (300 files): the
- * only match is the plan review capture itself.
- *
- * ## The `❯` either row may carry (Issue #2793)
- *
- * `↓` past the plan's last line moves the focus onto the ACTION list, and the
- * focused action is drawn with a `❯ ` in front of it and two spaces before its
- * key (`tests/fixtures/command-code-plan-review-2763/`, 1.58.0):
- *
- *     ❯ Approve  ctrl+a   executes the plan        ← `plan-review-action-focus-approve.txt`
- *     Cancel esc
- *
- *     Approve ctrl+a   executes the plan · comments go along as notes
- *     ❯ Cancel  esc                                ← `plan-review-long-scrolled-cancel-focused.txt`
- *
- * Without the optional `❯ ` this pattern missed both frames, and they went on to
- * the composer check, where `COMMAND_CODE_PROMPT_PATTERN` (`^❯(\s*$|\s+\S)`)
- * read the cursor row as the composer and published `ready` / `input_prompt`:
- * `wait` exited 0 on a plan nobody had approved — #2754's `❯`-outside-the-list
- * family. It is also the frame on which `Enter` EXECUTES the focused action, so
- * missing it here would also have left the chat surface's `Enter` on screen
- * (see {@link SelectionListShape.offersPlanApprove}). Only `❯`, and only as a
- * prefix: `❯ ` + the row is the one measured spelling of a focused action.
- * Re-swept over the same two directories with the widened pattern: every match
- * is still a `command-code-plan-review-*` capture, which
- * `command-code-plan-review-2793.test.ts` keeps pinned.
- */
-exports.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_FOOTER = /^\s*(?:❯ +)?Approve\s+ctrl\+a\b[^\n]*\n\s*(?:❯ +)?Cancel\s+esc\s*$/im;
-/**
- * The radio row `ctrl+a` puts in place of the action list when comments are
- * pending (Issue #2793).
- *
- * Measured on 1.58.0 (`tests/fixtures/command-code-plan-review-2763/`): with
- * zero comments `ctrl+a` approves at once, and with one or more it first asks
- * what to do with them. The three action rows are replaced by ONE row, and the
- * selected side is `(•)`, the other `( )` — readable without the ANSI:
- *
- *     Approve (•) with 4 comments as notes ( ) original plan · discard comments
- *
- * `comments?` because the badge above it is measured in both numbers
- * (`1 pending comment` / `4 pending comments`); the radio itself was captured
- * with four.
- */
-exports.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_ROW = /^\s*Approve\s+\([• ]\)\s+with\s+\d+\s+comments?\s+as\s+notes\s+\([• ]\)\s+original\s+plan\b/im;
-/**
- * The hint bar under {@link COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_ROW}, verbatim
- * `←/→ choose · enter confirm · esc back`.
- *
- * Anchored to the LAST row of the text it is tested against (no `m` flag: `$` is
- * the end of the input), because that is where the overlay draws every one of
- * its five measured hint bars, and because it is what keeps a transcript that
- * QUOTES this screen from matching — the composer is always drawn below a
- * transcript, so there the quote is never the last row.
- */
-exports.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_FOOTER = /(?:^|\n)[ \t]*←\/→\s+choose\s*·\s*enter\s+confirm\s*·\s*esc\s+back\s*$/i;
-/**
- * Whether this tail is the approve-with-comments confirmation (Issue #2793).
- *
- * BOTH rows, for the reason {@link COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_FOOTER} gives for
- * its two: either half alone is a sentence something else could print. Not
- * adjacent — `Editor exited with code 127` and a blank row sit between them on
- * both captures — so each is tested on its own.
- *
- * Deliberately NOT folded into {@link COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_FOOTER}, and
- * therefore not {@link SelectionListShape.offersPlanApprove}: on this screen
- * `enter` is the documented CONFIRM of an approval the human already started
- * with `ctrl+a`, so the chat surface must keep its `Enter`, and what `ctrl+a`
- * does here was not measured.
- *
- * @param tail - the frame's last rows, ANSI stripped, last content row last
- */
-function isCommandCodePlanApproveChoice(tail) {
-    return (exports.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_ROW.test(tail) &&
-        exports.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_FOOTER.test(tail));
-}
-/**
- * How many content rows the plan review footer's LAST row (`Cancel esc`) may
- * have under it and still be the overlay's own footer (Issue #2846): the footer's
- * two rows plus three.
- *
- * Measured over the sixteen plan review captures that carry the footer
- * (`tests/fixtures/command-code-plan-review-2761/`, `-2763/`): fourteen draw ONE
- * row below it, the hint bar (`type + enter to comment · …`); one draws two, an
- * `Editor exited with code 127` row and then the hint bar; and the garbled
- * `editor-killed-staircase.txt` draws three, because the pane wrapped the hint
- * bar. So the plan review footer is NOT the last row the way the picker's is,
- * and a "last two rows" rule misses every one of them.
- *
- * What bounds it from above is the composer. A transcript is always drawn above
- * one, and its shortest measured form is four rows — rule, `❯ Ask your
- * question...`, rule, status row — so a footer QUOTED in a reply has at least
- * four content rows under it and its `Approve` row falls outside this window.
- * The margin between the widest overlay (3) and the narrowest composer (4) is
- * one row; a capture that narrows it is the reason to re-measure, not to widen
- * this.
- */
-const COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_TAIL_ROW_COUNT = 5;
-/**
- * The last `count` rows of `text` that carry content, joined with `\n`.
- *
- * Blank rows are dropped rather than counted: the pane is padded with them, and
- * a real footer is set off from its hint bar by one.
- */
-function lastContentRows(text, count) {
-    return text
-        .split('\n')
-        .filter((row) => row.trim() !== '')
-        .slice(-count)
-        .join('\n');
-}
-/**
- * Whether the LAST content row of this tail is Command Code's picker footer
- * (Issue #2846).
- *
- * {@link COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST_FOOTER} matches the sentence anywhere, and
- * a reply that quotes the `/model` footer is that sentence in the middle of the
- * transcript. The picker draws the footer as the last row of the pane (all four
- * captures that carry it do, `tests/fixtures/chat-dialog-card-2254/`), and a
- * transcript always has the composer under it — the same reasoning
- * {@link COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_FOOTER} anchors with `$`.
- *
- * @param tail - the frame's last rows, ANSI stripped, last content row last
- */
-function hasCommandCodeSelectionListFooterAtBottom(tail) {
-    return exports.COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST_FOOTER.test(lastContentRows(tail, 1));
-}
-/**
- * Whether the LAST content row of this tail is the dismiss-only panel's footer
- * (Issue #2846). `Press Esc to close` is the panel's last row
- * ({@link DISMISSABLE_PANEL_FOOTER_PATTERN}); the same row inside a reply has
- * the composer under it.
- *
- * @param tail - the frame's last rows, ANSI stripped, last content row last
- */
-function hasCommandCodeDismissablePanelFooterAtBottom(tail) {
-    return exports.DISMISSABLE_PANEL_FOOTER_PATTERN.test(lastContentRows(tail, 1));
-}
-/**
- * Whether the plan review footer ({@link COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_FOOTER}) sits
- * at the bottom of this tail (Issue #2846): both of its rows are within the last
- * {@link COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_TAIL_ROW_COUNT} content rows, which is the
- * overlay's own hint bar and nothing as tall as a composer.
- *
- * @param tail - the frame's last rows, ANSI stripped, last content row last
- */
-function hasCommandCodePlanReviewFooterAtBottom(tail) {
-    return exports.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_FOOTER.test(lastContentRows(tail, COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_TAIL_ROW_COUNT));
-}
-/**
- * How many rows from the end of the content the dismiss footer is looked for.
- *
- * The same 15-row tail the detection chain hands a tool module as
- * `NormalizedFrame.lastLines` (`STATUS_CHECK_LINE_COUNT`), restated as a number
- * here because this module is a browser-safe leaf and `tools/frame.ts` pulls in
- * `cli-patterns`. `detect.ts` reads `frame.lastLines` and never this constant,
- * so the two cannot disagree about the detector's own window; this one bounds
- * the CLIENT-side reading in {@link hasDismissablePanelFooter}.
- */
-const DISMISSABLE_PANEL_TAIL_LINE_COUNT = 15;
-/**
- * Whether the tail of this frame is a dismiss-only panel (Issue #2369).
- *
- * The same question `commandCodeStatusDetector.afterPrompt` asks of
- * `frame.lastLines`, asked of a raw capture, so the chat surface can answer for
- * a frame whose server verdict has not reached it. The pattern is shared rather
- * than restated — one expression, two call sites, exactly as
- * {@link COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST_FOOTER} is shared between the detector and
- * the dialog card.
- *
- * @param frame - a raw `capture-pane -p -e` frame, ANSI intact
- */
-function hasDismissablePanelFooter(frame) {
-    if (!frame)
-        return false;
-    const lines = (0, ansi_1.stripAnsi)(frame.replace(/\r\n/g, '\n')).split('\n');
-    let last = lines.length - 1;
-    while (last >= 0 && lines[last].trim() === '')
-        last -= 1;
-    if (last < 0)
-        return false;
-    const tail = lines.slice(Math.max(0, last + 1 - DISMISSABLE_PANEL_TAIL_LINE_COUNT), last + 1);
-    return tail.some((line) => exports.DISMISSABLE_PANEL_FOOTER_PATTERN.test(line));
-}
-/**
- * The horizontal rule Command Code draws directly above a full-screen dialog.
- *
- * Command Code is an INLINE tool (`alternate_on=0`): opening `/model` does not
- * clear the pane, it paints the picker under whatever the session has already
- * printed. On the capture taken for Issue #2326 that is 256 rows of banner and
- * transcript followed by a 77-row picker, and this rule row is the seam between
- * them — 200 columns of U+2500 at the production `TUI_PANE_WIDTH`, the only
- * such row anywhere on the frame while the picker is open (the composer's own
- * two rules are not drawn while a dialog has the screen).
- *
- * Matched as "nothing but the rule glyph", not as "contains one", because a box
- * border (`╭──…──╮`, which is how copilot draws ITS pickers) carries corners and
- * must NOT be read as this seam — see
- * {@link extractCommandCodeSelectionListFrame} for why that non-match is the
- * safe answer rather than a missed case.
- */
-const COMMAND_CODE_RULE_ROW_PATTERN = /^\u2500+$/;
-/**
- * How wide a rule row must be before it counts as the dialog seam.
- *
- * The measured row is the full pane width (200 columns), and a pure function
- * cannot know that width, so this is a floor rather than an equality: it only
- * has to reject a short dash run inside a reply. Forty columns is a quarter of
- * the production pane and wider than any decorative rule measured in
- * `tests/fixtures/`.
- */
-const COMMAND_CODE_RULE_MIN_COLUMNS = 40;
-/**
- * The cursor glyph Command Code draws against the highlighted option.
- *
- * U+276F, measured on the capture Issue #2521 was raised from. Only this one,
- * and not codex's `›` or gemini's `●`: {@link readCommandCodeQuestionRegion}
- * counts cursors to decide whether the region holds ONE live dialog, and a
- * wider alphabet would start counting glyphs that are not cursors at all.
- */
-const COMMAND_CODE_CURSOR_GLYPH = '❯';
-/**
- * The markers Command Code paints on a question screen's tab strip.
- *
- * Measured row: `● Dispatch | ◯ Review` — a filled disc on the tab that has the
- * screen and a hollow ring on the one that does not. The names are NOT part of
- * the reading (a different question draws different tabs); what is read is the
- * strip's structure, which is what {@link isCommandCodeQuestionTabRow} states.
- *
- * Two families rather than one alphabet, because "one of these is filled and one
- * of these is not" is the whole signal. A list of bullets (`● item one`) carries
- * the first family and nothing else, and a bullet list is the thing this
- * reading must never mistake for a dialog.
- */
-const COMMAND_CODE_TAB_SELECTED_MARKERS = '●◉⦿';
-/** The hollow half of {@link COMMAND_CODE_TAB_SELECTED_MARKERS}'s pair. */
-const COMMAND_CODE_TAB_UNSELECTED_MARKERS = '◯○◌⚪';
-/**
- * The ANSWERED half, measured on 1.54.1 (Issue #2753).
- *
- * A multi-question `AskUserQuestion` keeps one tab per question and marks the
- * ones already answered: `✔ Party size | ✔ Rental car | ● Update scope | ◯ Review`.
- * Before this family existed the whole strip failed the cell test, the reader answered
- * `none`, and the generic parser read the checkbox list under it as a single
- * select — see the Issue for the capture.
- *
- * U+2714 and nothing else. `✓` (U+2713) and `☑` (U+2611) are the shapes a check
- * mark could take; neither has been seen on a pane, and this reading is shared
- * with `ChatSurface` and `extractCommandCodeSelectionListFrame`, which run for
- * EVERY tool — so an unmeasured glyph here widens what other tools' frames can
- * be claimed as this screen.
- */
-const COMMAND_CODE_TAB_ANSWERED_MARKERS = '✔';
-/** One `<marker> <label>` cell of the tab strip. */
-const COMMAND_CODE_TAB_SEGMENT_PATTERN = new RegExp(`^\\s*([${COMMAND_CODE_TAB_SELECTED_MARKERS}${COMMAND_CODE_TAB_UNSELECTED_MARKERS}${COMMAND_CODE_TAB_ANSWERED_MARKERS}])\\s+\\S`);
-/**
- * Is this row Command Code's question-screen tab strip?
- *
- * Three conditions, and each one is a bullet list this predicate has to refuse:
- *
- *  - **two or more `|`-separated cells.** `● Dispatch` on its own is a bullet;
- *    `● Dispatch | ◯ Review` is a strip. The separator is the cheapest part of
- *    the structure and the one prose never has in this position;
- *  - **every cell is `<marker> <label>`.** A row that is a strip for its first
- *    cell and prose for its second is prose;
- *  - **at least one filled marker, and at least one other cell.** A tab strip
- *    says which tab has the screen. A row of identical bullets does not, and
- *    `● one | ● two` is exactly the list-with-a-pipe this rules out. The other
- *    cell may be hollow (not answered yet) or the `✔` of an answered tab
- *    (measured on 1.54.1 — Issue #2753); what may not be missing is the filled
- *    one, so `✔ one | ✔ two` is still refused.
- */
-function isCommandCodeQuestionTabRow(line) {
-    const segments = line.split('|');
-    if (segments.length < 2)
-        return false;
-    let selected = 0;
-    let others = 0;
-    for (const segment of segments) {
-        const match = COMMAND_CODE_TAB_SEGMENT_PATTERN.exec(segment);
-        if (match === null)
-            return false;
-        if (COMMAND_CODE_TAB_SELECTED_MARKERS.includes(match[1]))
-            selected += 1;
-        else
-            others += 1;
-    }
-    return selected > 0 && others > 0;
-}
-/**
- * Rows that mean the region spans more than the one dialog on screen now.
- *
- * Issue #2521's condition 4: the tab strip and its options have to be the
- * SAME screen, with no other turn's generating or completion UI between them.
- * Structurally that is mostly settled by taking the LAST rule row as the top
- * edge — a new turn repaints the composer, and the composer's own lower rule
- * then becomes that edge — so this pattern is the belt to that braces, for a
- * frame captured mid-repaint.
- *
- * Two rows, both restated here rather than imported: `cli-patterns` owns
- * Command Code's busy and marker vocabularies and pulls the logger and the tool
- * registry in with them, and this module is the browser-safe leaf the chat
- * surface imports (see the module docblock).
- *
- *  - `esc to interrupt`, the tail Command Code appends to every status row
- *    (`COMMAND_CODE_INTERRUPT_HINT_PATTERN`). A turn is in flight;
- *  - a row that OPENS with U+273B and a word — `✻ Thought for 1 second`,
- *    `✻ Worked for 4s`. Matched by shape rather than by the two English verbs,
- *    so a reworded or localised marker still ends the region.
- */
-const COMMAND_CODE_QUESTION_REGION_REJECT_PATTERN = /\besc\s+to\s+interrupt\b|^[^\S\n]*✻[^\S\n]+\S/im;
+const selection_shape_1 = require("./tools/command-code/selection-shape");
+var selection_shape_2 = require("./tools/command-code/selection-shape");
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_FOOTER", { enumerable: true, get: function () { return selection_shape_2.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_FOOTER; } });
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_ROW", { enumerable: true, get: function () { return selection_shape_2.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_APPROVE_CHOICE_ROW; } });
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST_FOOTER", { enumerable: true, get: function () { return selection_shape_2.COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST_FOOTER; } });
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "DISMISSABLE_PANEL_FOOTER_PATTERN", { enumerable: true, get: function () { return selection_shape_2.DISMISSABLE_PANEL_FOOTER_PATTERN; } });
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "hasCommandCodeDismissablePanelFooterAtBottom", { enumerable: true, get: function () { return selection_shape_2.hasCommandCodeDismissablePanelFooterAtBottom; } });
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "hasCommandCodePlanReviewFooterAtBottom", { enumerable: true, get: function () { return selection_shape_2.hasCommandCodePlanReviewFooterAtBottom; } });
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "hasCommandCodeSelectionListFooterAtBottom", { enumerable: true, get: function () { return selection_shape_2.hasCommandCodeSelectionListFooterAtBottom; } });
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "hasDismissablePanelFooter", { enumerable: true, get: function () { return selection_shape_2.hasDismissablePanelFooter; } });
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "isCommandCodePlanApproveChoice", { enumerable: true, get: function () { return selection_shape_2.isCommandCodePlanApproveChoice; } });
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "readCommandCodeReviewPage", { enumerable: true, get: function () { return selection_shape_2.readCommandCodeReviewPage; } });
 /**
  * Where a footer-less Command Code question screen sits on a pane (Issue #2521).
  *
@@ -687,111 +304,6 @@ function readCommandCodeQuestionRegion(frame) {
 function hasCommandCodeQuestionChrome(frame) {
     return scanCommandCodeQuestionScreen(frame) !== null;
 }
-/**
- * The Review page's own three rows, measured on 1.54.1 (Issue #2755 §7).
- *
- * `Enter` on the `Submit` row does not send the answers — it opens a SECOND
- * screen:
- *
- *     ✔ Update scope | ● Review
- *
- *     1. Which files should I update?
- *        calc.js
- *
- *     ❯ 1. Submit
- *       2. Cancel
- *
- *     ← to go back and edit
- *
- * ## Why this needs a reading of its own
- *
- * Because it is a real numbered list under a real tab strip, and the GENERIC
- * parser answers it: a two-option `multiple_choice` whose default is `Submit`.
- * The default answer on that payload does not pick anything — it COMMITS
- * whatever the human has ticked so far, from a payload nobody meant to expose,
- * which is #1928's shape one screen later. Auto-Yes fires on defaults.
- *
- * Words rather than structure, and deliberately: the two numbered rows are
- * `Submit` and `Cancel`, which is the same shape as any other two-option
- * question. What separates this page from a question is only what it SAYS, so
- * all three rows are required together — the confirm pair AND the back hint —
- * and the whole thing is anchored inside a recognised question region. A screen
- * that carries two of the three keeps every verdict it had.
- *
- * The cursor glyph is optional on both numbered rows: it rests on `1. Submit`
- * when the page is reached by `Enter`, and the Issue is explicit that a pattern
- * decided on the bare word would miss it.
- */
-const COMMAND_CODE_REVIEW_SUBMIT_ROW_PATTERN = /^[^\S\n]*(?:\u276F[^\S\n]*)?1[.)][^\S\n]+Submit[^\S\n]*$/im;
-/** The `Cancel` half of {@link COMMAND_CODE_REVIEW_SUBMIT_ROW_PATTERN}'s pair. */
-const COMMAND_CODE_REVIEW_CANCEL_ROW_PATTERN = /^[^\S\n]*(?:\u276F[^\S\n]*)?2[.)][^\S\n]+Cancel[^\S\n]*$/im;
-/** The footer only the Review page draws. */
-const COMMAND_CODE_REVIEW_BACK_HINT_PATTERN = /^[^\S\n]*\u2190[^\S\n]+to[^\S\n]+go[^\S\n]+back[^\S\n]+and[^\S\n]+edit[^\S\n]*$/im;
-/**
- * The warning the Review page carries when it was reached with answers missing.
- *
- * Measured from the undocumented `d`, which ends a multi-select from any row:
- * `⚠ You have not answered all questions` over a `No answer`. Issue #2755 §7
- * requires that such a page is never read as "answered", which is why the
- * predicate below reports it rather than hiding it.
- */
-const COMMAND_CODE_REVIEW_UNANSWERED_PATTERN = /have\s+not\s+answered\s+all\s+questions/i;
-/**
- * Read Command Code's `AskUserQuestion` Review page, if this frame is one
- * (Issue #2755 §7).
- *
- * The same region {@link readCommandCodeQuestionRegion} works on — last rule
- * row, tab strip as the first row under it — plus the three rows above. The
- * question-shaped conditions are deliberately NOT applied: this page has no
- * question body of its own on the `Submit`/`Cancel` spelling (the answers sit
- * where the question would), and it draws `1.` twice, so the strict reading
- * declines it for a numbering reason that says nothing about what it is.
- *
- * `null` for everything else, so no existing verdict moves except the two
- * captures this is about.
- *
- * @param frame - a raw `capture-pane -p -e` frame, ANSI intact (CRLF tolerated)
- */
-function readCommandCodeReviewPage(frame) {
-    if (!frame)
-        return null;
-    const lines = frame.replace(/\r\n/g, '\n').split('\n').map(ansi_1.stripAnsi);
-    let last = lines.length - 1;
-    while (last >= 0 && lines[last].trim() === '')
-        last -= 1;
-    if (last < 1)
-        return null;
-    let ruleLineIndex = -1;
-    for (let i = last - 1; i >= 0; i -= 1) {
-        const row = lines[i].trim();
-        if (row.length < COMMAND_CODE_RULE_MIN_COLUMNS)
-            continue;
-        if (!COMMAND_CODE_RULE_ROW_PATTERN.test(row))
-            continue;
-        ruleLineIndex = i;
-        break;
-    }
-    if (ruleLineIndex < 0)
-        return null;
-    const region = lines.slice(ruleLineIndex + 1, last + 1);
-    const tabOffset = region.findIndex((line) => line.trim() !== '');
-    if (tabOffset < 0)
-        return null;
-    if (!isCommandCodeQuestionTabRow(region[tabOffset]))
-        return null;
-    const body = region.join('\n');
-    if (!COMMAND_CODE_REVIEW_SUBMIT_ROW_PATTERN.test(body))
-        return null;
-    if (!COMMAND_CODE_REVIEW_CANCEL_ROW_PATTERN.test(body))
-        return null;
-    if (!COMMAND_CODE_REVIEW_BACK_HINT_PATTERN.test(body))
-        return null;
-    const submitRow = region.find((row) => COMMAND_CODE_REVIEW_SUBMIT_ROW_PATTERN.test(row));
-    return {
-        hasUnansweredWarning: COMMAND_CODE_REVIEW_UNANSWERED_PATTERN.test(body),
-        cursorOnSubmit: submitRow !== undefined && submitRow.includes(COMMAND_CODE_CURSOR_GLYPH),
-    };
-}
 /**
  * The structural half of the question-screen reading, shared by the strict
  * {@link readCommandCodeQuestionRegion} and the weaker
@@ -816,9 +328,9 @@ function scanCommandCodeQuestionScreen(frame) {
     let ruleLineIndex = -1;
     for (let i = last - 1; i >= 0; i -= 1) {
         const row = lines[i].trim();
-        if (row.length < COMMAND_CODE_RULE_MIN_COLUMNS)
+        if (row.length < selection_shape_1.COMMAND_CODE_RULE_MIN_COLUMNS)
             continue;
-        if (!COMMAND_CODE_RULE_ROW_PATTERN.test(row))
+        if (!selection_shape_1.COMMAND_CODE_RULE_ROW_PATTERN.test(row))
             continue;
         ruleLineIndex = i;
         break;
@@ -828,19 +340,19 @@ function scanCommandCodeQuestionScreen(frame) {
     const region = lines.slice(ruleLineIndex + 1, last + 1);
     const body = region.join('\n');
     // 5. The screens this reading must not take over.
-    if (FILTER_INPUT_PATTERN.test(body))
+    if (selection_shape_patterns_1.FILTER_INPUT_PATTERN.test(body))
         return null;
-    if (exports.COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST_FOOTER.test(body))
+    if (selection_shape_1.COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST_FOOTER.test(body))
         return null;
-    if (exports.DISMISSABLE_PANEL_FOOTER_PATTERN.test(body))
+    if (selection_shape_1.DISMISSABLE_PANEL_FOOTER_PATTERN.test(body))
         return null;
-    if (COMMAND_CODE_QUESTION_REGION_REJECT_PATTERN.test(body))
+    if (selection_shape_1.COMMAND_CODE_QUESTION_REGION_REJECT_PATTERN.test(body))
         return null;
     // 2. The tab strip opens the region.
     const tabOffset = region.findIndex((line) => line.trim() !== '');
     if (tabOffset < 0)
         return null;
-    if (!isCommandCodeQuestionTabRow(region[tabOffset]))
+    if (!(0, selection_shape_1.isCommandCodeQuestionTabRow)(region[tabOffset]))
         return null;
     // 3. Numbered rows under it.
     const numbers = [];
@@ -893,7 +405,7 @@ function scanCommandCodeQuestionScreen(frame) {
     let cursorOffset = -1;
     let cursorOnOptionRow = false;
     for (let i = 0; i < region.length; i += 1) {
-        const inRow = region[i].split(COMMAND_CODE_CURSOR_GLYPH).length - 1;
+        const inRow = region[i].split(selection_shape_1.COMMAND_CODE_CURSOR_GLYPH).length - 1;
         if (inRow === 0)
             continue;
         cursorCount += inRow;
@@ -977,7 +489,7 @@ function extractCommandCodeSelectionListFrame(frame) {
     const lines = frame.replace(/\r\n/g, '\n').split('\n');
     let footer = -1;
     for (let i = lines.length - 1; i >= 0; i -= 1) {
-        if (exports.COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST_FOOTER.test((0, ansi_1.stripAnsi)(lines[i]))) {
+        if (selection_shape_1.COMMAND_CODE_SELECTION_LIST_FOOTER.test((0, ansi_1.stripAnsi)(lines[i]))) {
             footer = i;
             break;
         }
@@ -1000,9 +512,9 @@ function extractCommandCodeSelectionListFrame(frame) {
     }
     for (let i = footer - 1; i >= 0; i -= 1) {
         const row = (0, ansi_1.stripAnsi)(lines[i]).trim();
-        if (row.length < COMMAND_CODE_RULE_MIN_COLUMNS)
+        if (row.length < selection_shape_1.COMMAND_CODE_RULE_MIN_COLUMNS)
             continue;
-        if (!COMMAND_CODE_RULE_ROW_PATTERN.test(row))
+        if (!selection_shape_1.COMMAND_CODE_RULE_ROW_PATTERN.test(row))
             continue;
         return lines.slice(i + 1, footer + 1).join('\n');
     }
@@ -1074,8 +586,8 @@ function readSelectionListShape(frame) {
         optionCount: countTrailingOptionRun(lines),
         offersSessionScope: exports.SESSION_SCOPE_FOOTER_PATTERN.test(tail),
         commitsDefaultOnEnter: exports.SET_AS_DEFAULT_FOOTER_PATTERN.test(tail),
-        hasFilterInput: FILTER_INPUT_PATTERN.test(tail),
-        offersPlanApprove: exports.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_FOOTER.test(tail),
+        hasFilterInput: selection_shape_patterns_1.FILTER_INPUT_PATTERN.test(tail),
+        offersPlanApprove: selection_shape_patterns_1.COMMAND_CODE_PLAN_REVIEW_FOOTER.test(tail),
     };
 }
 /**