cokit-cli 1.0.8 → 1.0.9

package/skills/ck-ai-artist/references/image-prompting.md

@@ -1,141 +0,0 @@
-# Image Generation Prompting
-
-## Universal Structure
-```
-[Subject + Details] [Action/Pose] [Setting/Environment]
-[Style/Medium] [Artist/Movement Reference]
-[Lighting] [Camera/Lens] [Composition]
-[Quality Modifiers] [Aspect Ratio]
-```
-
-## Platform Reference
-
-### Midjourney v6.1
-```
-[prompt] --ar 16:9 --style raw --v 6.1
-```
-
-| Parameter | Values | Effect |
-|-----------|--------|--------|
-| `--ar` | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 4:3, 3:2, 21:9 | Aspect ratio |
-| `--style` | raw, default | raw=photorealistic |
-| `--stylize` | 0-1000 | Artistic interpretation (0=literal) |
-| `--chaos` | 0-100 | Variation between outputs |
-| `--weird` | 0-3000 | Unusual/experimental elements |
-| `--quality` | .25, .5, 1, 2 | Detail level (cost) |
-| `--seed` | number | Reproducibility |
-| `--no` | [term] | Negative prompt inline |
-| `--tile` | - | Seamless patterns |
-
-**Multi-prompt weighting**: `cat::2 dog::1` (cat 2x stronger)
-**Describe**: Upload image → get prompt suggestions
-**Blend**: `/blend` to merge 2-5 images
-
-### DALL-E 3
-- Natural language only, no parameters
-- Be descriptive, not keyword-heavy
-- Specify: "HD quality" or "vivid style" in prompt
-- Text rendering: Describe font, placement, content explicitly
-- Avoid: Lists of keywords, technical jargon
-
-### Stable Diffusion / SDXL / Flux
-```
-(important term:1.3), normal term, (less important:0.8)
-Negative prompt: ugly, blurry, deformed, watermark
-```
-
-| Feature | Syntax |
-|---------|--------|
-| Weight up | `(word:1.2)` to `(word:1.5)` |
-| Weight down | `(word:0.5)` to `(word:0.8)` |
-| LoRA | `<lora:model_name:0.8>` |
-| Embedding | `embedding:name` |
-| Blend | `[cat|dog]` alternating |
-
-**CFG Scale**: 7-12 typical (higher=more prompt adherence)
-**Samplers**: DPM++ 2M Karras (quality), Euler a (speed)
-
-### Nano Banana (Gemini)
-```
-[Narrative description, not keywords]
-Captured with 85mm lens, soft bokeh, natural lighting
-```
-
-**Key features**:
-- 32K token context (complex prompts OK)
-- Narrative paragraphs > keyword lists
-- Hex colors for precision: `#9F2B68`
-- Text rendering: Describe font, placement explicitly
-- Multi-image: Up to 14 reference images
-- Search grounding: Real-time data (weather, events)
-- Thinking mode: Complex composition reasoning
-
-**Aspect ratios**: 1:1, 2:3, 3:2, 3:4, 4:3, 4:5, 5:4, 9:16, 16:9, 21:9
-**Resolution**: 1K, 2K, 4K (use uppercase K)
-
-**Best practices**:
-- ALL CAPS for critical requirements
-- Markdown lists for multiple rules
-- "NEVER include..." for negative constraints
-- Photography terms anchor quality
-
-### Imagen 4 / Veo 3.1
-- Natural language, descriptive
-- Aspect ratio in text: "16:9 landscape format"
-- Veo: Cinematography keywords most powerful
-- Camera movements: pan, tilt, dolly, crane, tracking
-- Scene transitions: cut, fade, dissolve
-
-## Style Keywords
-
-### Art Movements
-photorealistic, hyperrealistic, impressionist, expressionist,
-surrealist, art nouveau, art deco, pop art, cyberpunk, steampunk,
-solarpunk, vaporwave, synthwave, brutalist, minimalist
-
-### Media Types
-oil painting, watercolor, digital art, 3D render, vector art,
-pencil sketch, ink drawing, pastel, charcoal, gouache, fresco
-
-### Photography Styles
-portrait, landscape, macro, street, documentary, fashion,
-editorial, product, architectural, aerial, underwater
-
-## Lighting Vocabulary
-
-| Term | Effect |
-|------|--------|
-| Golden hour | Warm, soft, directional |
-| Blue hour | Cool, moody, twilight |
-| Rembrandt | Triangle on cheek, dramatic |
-| Butterfly | Shadow under nose, glamorous |
-| Split | Half face lit, mysterious |
-| Rim/back | Edge highlight, separation |
-| Volumetric | Light rays visible |
-| Neon glow | Colorful, cyberpunk |
-
-## Camera/Lens Terms
-- 50mm (standard), 85mm (portrait), 35mm (wide)
-- Telephoto (compressed), Macro (close-up), Fisheye (distorted)
-- Shallow DOF, Deep DOF, Bokeh
-- Low angle, High angle, Dutch angle, Bird's eye, Worm's eye
-
-## Composition Keywords
-rule of thirds, golden ratio, centered, symmetrical,
-leading lines, framing, negative space, filling frame,
-foreground interest, layered depth
-
-## Negative Prompts (SD/Flux)
-```
-ugly, deformed, blurry, low quality, bad anatomy,
-extra limbs, missing limbs, disfigured, watermark,
-text, signature, cropped, out of frame, duplicate,
-poorly drawn, bad proportions, gross proportions
-```
-
-## Iterative Workflow
-1. Start: Subject + style + quality modifier
-2. Add: Lighting + composition + camera
-3. Test: Generate 4 variations
-4. Refine: Adjust weights, add negatives
-5. Upscale: Select winner, increase resolution

package/skills/ck-ai-artist/references/llm-prompting.md

@@ -1,165 +0,0 @@
-# LLM Prompting Reference
-
-## Prompt Architecture
-
-### System Prompt Structure
-```
-You are [ROLE] with expertise in [DOMAIN].
-
-## Context
-[Background, constraints, tone]
-
-## Instructions
-[Step-by-step task breakdown]
-
-## Output Format
-[Exact structure with example]
-
-## Constraints
-- [Hard limits]
-- [Guardrails]
-```
-
-### User Prompt Structure
-```xml
-<context>[Background information]</context>
-<task>[Specific action required]</task>
-<format>[Output structure]</format>
-<constraints>[Additional limits]</constraints>
-```
-
-## Reasoning Techniques
-
-### Chain of Thought (CoT)
-| Variant | Trigger | Best For |
-|---------|---------|----------|
-| Zero-shot | "Think step by step" | Quick reasoning tasks |
-| Few-shot | 2-3 reasoning examples | Complex multi-step |
-| Auto-CoT | "Let's approach systematically" | General reasoning |
-
-### Tree of Thoughts (ToT)
-```
-Explore 3 approaches to [problem]:
-For each: 1) Method 2) Pros/cons 3) Success probability
-Evaluate branches, select best path.
-```
-
-### Self-Consistency
-Run same prompt 3-5x with temp=0.7, take majority answer. Best for: math, logic, factual.
-
-### ReAct Pattern
-```
-Thought: [Current reasoning]
-Action: [Tool/step to take]
-Observation: [Result]
-...repeat...
-Final Answer: [Conclusion]
-```
-
-### Least-to-Most
-```
-Break [complex task] into subproblems.
-Solve easiest first, build up.
-```
-
-## Instruction Optimization
-
-### Self-Refine Pattern
-```
-1. Generate initial response
-2. Critique: "What's wrong with this?"
-3. Refine: "Fix identified issues"
-4. Repeat until satisfactory
-```
-
-### Role Optimization
-- **Expert persona**: "As a senior [role] with 20 years..."
-- **Constraint persona**: "You only respond with..."
-- **Teaching persona**: "Explain as if to a..."
-
-### Task Decomposition
-```
-<subtasks>
-1. [First step - output X]
-2. [Second step - using X, output Y]
-3. [Final step - using Y, output Z]
-</subtasks>
-```
-
-## Output Control
-
-### JSON Enforcement
-```
-Respond in valid JSON only:
-{"field": "type", "required": true}
-No markdown, no explanation, just JSON.
-```
-
-### Length Control
-| Goal | Phrase |
-|------|--------|
-| Brief | "In 2-3 sentences" |
-| Detailed | "Comprehensive analysis in 500 words" |
-| Structured | "5 bullet points, max 20 words each" |
-
-### Hallucination Reduction
-- "Only use information from provided context"
-- "If unsure, say 'I don't know'"
-- "Cite sources for each claim"
-- "Confidence: high/medium/low for each point"
-
-## Model-Specific Tips
-
-### Claude
-- XML tags: `<thinking>`, `<answer>`, `<context>`
-- Extended thinking: "Think deeply before responding"
-- Prefill: Start assistant response to guide format
-
-### GPT-4
-- JSON mode: `response_format: {"type": "json_object"}`
-- Function calling for structured output
-- System message for persistent instructions
-
-### Gemini
-- Multimodal: Image + text in same prompt
-- Grounding: Enable Google Search for facts
-- Safety settings: Adjust thresholds
-
-## Context Engineering
-
-### RAG Prompt Pattern
-```
-<retrieved_context>
-[Document chunks with sources]
-</retrieved_context>
-
-Answer based ONLY on context above.
-If not in context, say "Not found in documents."
-```
-
-### Window Optimization
-- Front-load critical info (primacy effect)
-- Repeat key constraints at end (recency effect)
-- Chunk long documents with summaries
-
-## Few-Shot Examples
-
-### Structure
-```
-Example 1:
-Input: [representative input]
-Output: [ideal output]
-
-Example 2:
-Input: [edge case]
-Output: [handling]
-
-Now apply to:
-Input: [actual task]
-```
-
-### Selection Criteria
-- Diverse examples > similar examples
-- Include edge cases
-- Match complexity of target task
-- 2-5 examples optimal (diminishing returns beyond)

package/skills/ck-ai-artist/references/nano-banana.md

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
-# Nano Banana (Gemini Image)
-
-## Models
-
-| Model ID | Type | Best For |
-|----------|------|----------|
-| `gemini-2.5-flash-image` | Flash | Speed, high-volume |
-| `gemini-3-pro-image-preview` | Pro | Text rendering, complex prompts |
-
-## Core Principle
-
-**Narrative paragraphs > keyword lists** (32K context). Write like briefing a photographer.
-
-## Parameters
-
-```python
-responseModalities=['TEXT', 'IMAGE']
-aspect_ratio="16:9"  # 1:1, 2:3, 3:2, 3:4, 4:3, 4:5, 5:4, 9:16, 16:9, 21:9
-image_size="2K"      # 1K, 2K, 4K - MUST be uppercase K
-```
-
-## Prompt Templates
-
-**Photorealistic**: `A [subject] in [location], [lens] lens. [Lighting] creates [mood]. [Details]. [Camera angle]. Professional photography, natural lighting.`
-
-**Illustration**: `[Art style] illustration of [subject]. [Color palette]. [Line style]. [Background]. [Mood].`
-
-**Text in Image**: `Image with text "[EXACT]" in [font]. Font: [style]. Color: [hex/#FF5733]. Position: [top/center/bottom]. Background: [desc]. Context: [poster/sign].`
-
-**Product**: `[Product] on [surface]. Materials: [finish]. Lighting: [setup]. Camera: [angle]. Background: [type]. Style: [commercial/lifestyle].`
-
-## Techniques
-
-| Technique | Example |
-|-----------|---------|
-| Emphasis | `ALL CAPS` for critical requirements |
-| Precision colors | `#9F2B68` instead of "dark magenta" |
-| Negative constraints | `NEVER include text/watermarks. DO NOT add labels.` |
-| Realism trigger | `Natural lighting, DOF. Captured with Canon EOS 90D DSLR.` |
-| Structured edits | `Make ALL edits: - [1] - [2] - [3]` |
-| Complex logic | `Kittens MUST have heterochromatic eyes matching fur colors` |
-
-## Advanced Features
-
-**Multi-Image Input** (up to 14): 6 object + 5 human refs. Tip: collage refs into single image.
-
-**Search Grounding**: `tools=[{"google_search": {}}]` — real-time data (weather, charts, events).
-
-**Thinking Mode** (Pro only): `part.thought` in response for complex reasoning.
-
-## Workflow
-
-1. Narrative description → 2. Photography terms → 3. ALL CAPS emphasis → 4. Multi-turn refine → 5. Negative constraints → 6. Set ratio/resolution
-
-## Avoid
-
-- Keyword spam ("4k, trending, masterpiece")
-- Vague text ("add some text" → specify exact text, font, position)
-- Lowercase resolution ("4k" rejected, use "4K")

package/skills/ck-ai-artist/references/reasoning-techniques.md

@@ -1,201 +0,0 @@
-# Reasoning Techniques Deep Dive
-
-## Chain of Thought (CoT) Variants
-
-### Zero-Shot CoT
-```
-[Task description]
-
-Think step by step before answering.
-```
-**Use when**: Quick reasoning, no examples available
-**Effectiveness**: +40-60% on reasoning tasks
-
-### Few-Shot CoT
-```
-Example 1:
-Q: [Question]
-A: Let me think through this...
-   Step 1: [Reasoning]
-   Step 2: [Reasoning]
-   Therefore: [Answer]
-
-Example 2:
-Q: [Question]
-A: Breaking this down...
-   First: [Reasoning]
-   Next: [Reasoning]
-   So: [Answer]
-
-Now solve:
-Q: [Your question]
-```
-**Use when**: Complex reasoning, pattern demonstration needed
-**Effectiveness**: +50-80% on complex tasks
-
-### Auto-CoT
-```
-Let me approach this systematically:
-1. Identify the key elements
-2. Analyze relationships
-3. Apply relevant principles
-4. Draw conclusions
-5. Verify my reasoning
-```
-**Use when**: General problem-solving, exploratory reasoning
-
-## Tree of Thoughts (ToT)
-
-### Implementation Pattern
-```
-Problem: [Complex problem]
-
-Generate 3 different approaches:
-
-Approach A:
-- Method: [Description]
-- Reasoning: [Why this might work]
-- Potential issues: [Risks]
-- Confidence: [1-10]
-
-Approach B:
-- Method: [Description]
-- Reasoning: [Why this might work]
-- Potential issues: [Risks]
-- Confidence: [1-10]
-
-Approach C:
-- Method: [Description]
-- Reasoning: [Why this might work]
-- Potential issues: [Risks]
-- Confidence: [1-10]
-
-Evaluate branches:
-- Which has highest success probability?
-- Which has fewest risks?
-- Which is most feasible?
-
-Selected approach: [Best option with justification]
-Execution: [Step-by-step implementation]
-```
-
-**Use when**: Strategic decisions, multiple valid paths, high-stakes problems
-
-## Self-Consistency
-
-### Process
-1. Generate 5 responses at temp=0.7
-2. Extract final answers from each
-3. Take majority vote
-4. Report confidence = agreement %
-
-### Implementation
-```
-Run this prompt 5 times (or use n=5 parameter):
-[Your reasoning task]
-Think step by step and provide final answer.
-
-Aggregate: If 4/5 agree = high confidence
-          If 3/5 agree = medium confidence
-          If split = low confidence, needs review
-```
-
-**Use when**: Math, logic, factual questions with verifiable answers
-
-## ReAct (Reasoning + Acting)
-
-### Full Pattern
-```
-Task: [Goal to achieve]
-
-Thought 1: I need to understand the current situation.
-Action 1: [Observation or tool use]
-Observation 1: [Result from action]
-
-Thought 2: Based on this, I should [next logical step].
-Action 2: [Next action]
-Observation 2: [Result]
-
-Thought 3: Now I can see that [insight].
-Action 3: [Verification or next step]
-Observation 3: [Result]
-
-Thought 4: I have enough information to conclude.
-Final Answer: [Conclusion with reasoning]
-```
-
-**Use when**: Tool-augmented reasoning, research tasks, multi-step analysis
-
-## Least-to-Most Prompting
-
-### Structure
-```
-Complex problem: [Full problem statement]
-
-Step 1: Decomposition
-Break this into simpler subproblems, ordered from easiest to hardest:
-1. [Simplest subproblem]
-2. [Next subproblem, may depend on 1]
-3. [Harder subproblem, may depend on 1,2]
-4. [Final subproblem requiring all above]
-
-Step 2: Sequential Solution
-Subproblem 1: [Solution]
-Using result from 1, Subproblem 2: [Solution]
-Using results from 1,2, Subproblem 3: [Solution]
-Using all results, Subproblem 4: [Solution]
-
-Final integrated answer: [Complete solution]
-```
-
-**Use when**: Mathematical word problems, multi-step procedures, compositional tasks
-
-## Decomposed Prompting (DECOMP)
-
-### Pattern
-```
-Task: [Complex task]
-
-Required capabilities:
-- [Capability 1]: Use [specialized prompt/tool]
-- [Capability 2]: Use [specialized prompt/tool]
-- [Capability 3]: Use [specialized prompt/tool]
-
-Orchestration:
-1. Call [Capability 1] with [input] → get [output1]
-2. Call [Capability 2] with [output1] → get [output2]
-3. Call [Capability 3] with [output2] → get [final output]
-
-Integrate results: [Final response]
-```
-
-**Use when**: Tasks requiring diverse expertise, specialized sub-tasks
-
-## Constitutional AI Reasoning
-
-### Self-Critique Pattern
-```
-Initial response: [Generated content]
-
-Critique against principles:
-- Is it helpful? [Yes/No + reasoning]
-- Is it harmless? [Yes/No + reasoning]
-- Is it honest? [Yes/No + reasoning]
-
-If any No:
-Revised response that addresses [specific issues]:
-[Improved content]
-```
-
-## Choosing the Right Technique
-
-| Task Type | Best Technique |
-|-----------|---------------|
-| Simple reasoning | Zero-shot CoT |
-| Complex multi-step | Few-shot CoT |
-| Strategic decisions | Tree of Thoughts |
-| Factual verification | Self-Consistency |
-| Tool-using tasks | ReAct |
-| Word problems | Least-to-Most |
-| Specialized sub-tasks | DECOMP |
-| Safety-critical | Constitutional AI |