codex-workflows 0.6.8 → 0.6.9

package/.codex/agents/task-executor.toml

@@ -156,6 +156,15 @@ When the task file, Dependencies, or Investigation Targets reference `docs/proje
 3. **Cross-check against Investigation Notes**: Ensure planned implementation is consistent with the observations recorded in the task file
 4. **Execute determination**: Determine continue/escalation per "Mandatory Judgment Criteria" above
 
+#### Adjacent Case Sweep (Required when the task file has a `Change Category` field set to one or more of `bug-fix`, `regression`, `state-change`, `boundary-change`)
+
+Run this check after Pre-implementation Verification and before the Binding Decision Check. Treat the task file's field value as authoritative for whether the sweep applies.
+
+1. From Investigation Targets, identify cases sharing the same path, contract, persisted state, or external boundary as the change.
+2. Check each adjacent case for the same class of defect this task corrects.
+3. Fold adjacent residuals within Target Files into this task's failing tests and implementation.
+4. Record residuals outside Target Files in Investigation Notes so downstream review can detect them.
+
 #### Binding Decision Check (Required when the task file has a Binding Decisions section)
 
 Run this check after Pre-implementation Verification and before the TDD cycle when the task file contains a Binding Decisions section with one or more rows.
@@ -222,29 +231,7 @@ Return one of the following as the final response (see Structured Response Speci
 Report in the following JSON format upon task completion (**without executing quality checks or commits**, delegating to quality assurance process):
 
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "completed",
-  "taskName": "[Exact name of executed task]",
-  "changeSummary": "[Specific summary of implementation content/changes]",
-  "filesModified": ["specific/file/path1", "specific/file/path2"],
-  "testsAdded": ["created/test/file/path"],
-  "requiresTestReview": true,
-  "newTestsPassed": true,
-  "progressUpdated": {
-    "taskFile": "5/8 items completed",
-    "workPlan": "Relevant sections updated",
-    "designDoc": "Progress section updated or N/A"
-  },
-  "runnableCheck": {
-    "level": "L1: Unit test / L2: Integration test / L3: E2E test",
-    "executed": true,
-    "command": "Executed test command",
-    "result": "passed / failed / skipped",
-    "reason": "Test execution reason/verification content"
-  },
-  "readyForQualityCheck": true,
-  "nextActions": "Overall quality verification by quality assurance process"
-}
+{"status":"completed","taskName":"[Exact name of executed task]","changeSummary":"[Specific summary of implementation content/changes]","filesModified":["specific/file/path1","specific/file/path2"],"testsAdded":["created/test/file/path"],"requiresTestReview":true,"newTestsPassed":true,"progressUpdated":{"taskFile":"5/8 items completed","workPlan":"Relevant sections updated","designDoc":"Progress section updated or N/A"},"runnableCheck":{"level":"L1: Unit test / L2: Integration test / L3: E2E test","executed":true,"command":"Executed test command","result":"passed / failed / skipped","reason":"Test execution reason/verification content"},"readyForQualityCheck":true,"nextActions":"Overall quality verification by quality assurance process"}
 ```
 
 ### 2. Escalation Response
@@ -257,139 +244,35 @@ For task/AC/reference core-mechanism sources, set `details.design_doc_expectatio
 For core-mechanism violations, put the substitute in `details.actual_situation`, the behavior change in `details.why_cannot_implement`, and the unblock condition in `recommendation`.
 
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "escalation_needed",
-  "reason": "Design Doc deviation",
-  "taskName": "[Task name being executed]",
-  "details": {
-    "design_doc_expectation": "[Exact quote from relevant Design Doc section]",
-    "actual_situation": "[Details of situation actually encountered]",
-    "why_cannot_implement": "[Technical reason why cannot implement per Design Doc]",
-    "attempted_approaches": ["List of solution methods considered for trial"]
-  },
-  "escalation_type": "design_compliance_violation",
-  "user_decision_required": true,
-  "suggested_options": [
-    "Modify Design Doc to match reality",
-    "Implement missing components first",
-    "Reconsider requirements and change implementation approach"
-  ],
-  "recommendation": "[Specific proposal for most appropriate solution direction]"
-}
+{"status":"escalation_needed","reason":"Design Doc deviation","taskName":"[Task name being executed]","details":{"design_doc_expectation":"[Exact quote from relevant Design Doc section]","actual_situation":"[Details of situation actually encountered]","why_cannot_implement":"[Technical reason why cannot implement per Design Doc]","attempted_approaches":["List of solution methods considered for trial"]},"escalation_type":"design_compliance_violation","user_decision_required":true,"suggested_options":["Modify Design Doc to match reality","Implement missing components first","Reconsider requirements and change implementation approach"],"recommendation":"[Specific proposal for most appropriate solution direction]"}
 ```
 
 #### 2-2. Similar Function Discovery Escalation
 When discovering similar functions during existing code investigation, escalate in following JSON format:
 
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "escalation_needed",
-  "reason": "Similar function discovered",
-  "taskName": "[Task name being executed]",
-  "similar_functions": [
-    {
-      "file_path": "[path to existing implementation]",
-      "function_name": "existingFunction",
-      "similarity_reason": "Same domain, same responsibility",
-      "code_snippet": "[Excerpt of relevant code]",
-      "technical_debt_assessment": "high/medium/low/unknown"
-    }
-  ],
-  "search_details": {
-    "keywords_used": ["domain keywords", "responsibility keywords"],
-    "files_searched": 15,
-    "matches_found": 3
-  },
-  "escalation_type": "similar_function_found",
-  "user_decision_required": true,
-  "suggested_options": [
-    "Extend and use existing function",
-    "Refactor existing function then use",
-    "New implementation as technical debt (create ADR)",
-    "New implementation (clarify differentiation from existing)"
-  ],
-  "recommendation": "[Recommended approach based on existing code analysis]"
-}
+{"status":"escalation_needed","reason":"Similar function discovered","taskName":"[Task name being executed]","similar_functions":[{"file_path":"[path to existing implementation]","function_name":"existingFunction","similarity_reason":"Same domain, same responsibility","code_snippet":"[Excerpt of relevant code]","technical_debt_assessment":"high/medium/low/unknown"}],"search_details":{"keywords_used":["domain keywords","responsibility keywords"],"files_searched":15,"matches_found":3},"escalation_type":"similar_function_found","user_decision_required":true,"suggested_options":["Extend and use existing function","Refactor existing function then use","New implementation as technical debt (create ADR)","New implementation (clarify differentiation from existing)"],"recommendation":"[Recommended approach based on existing code analysis]"}
 ```
 
 #### 2-3. Investigation Target Not Found Escalation
 When an Investigation Target file does not exist or the path is stale, escalate in following JSON format:
 
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "escalation_needed",
-  "reason": "Investigation target not found",
-  "taskName": "[Task name being executed]",
-  "escalation_type": "investigation_target_not_found",
-  "missingTargets": [
-    {
-      "path": "[path specified in task file]",
-      "searchHint": "[section/function hint if provided, or null]",
-      "searchAttempts": ["Checked path directly", "Searched nearby files with similar names", "Reviewed task dependencies for renamed or moved files"]
-    }
-  ],
-  "user_decision_required": true,
-  "suggested_options": [
-    "Provide the correct file path",
-    "Remove this Investigation Target and proceed",
-    "Update the task file with current paths"
-  ],
-  "recommendation": "[Recommended next step based on what was found]"
-}
+{"status":"escalation_needed","reason":"Investigation target not found","taskName":"[Task name being executed]","escalation_type":"investigation_target_not_found","missingTargets":[{"path":"[path specified in task file]","searchHint":"[section/function hint if provided, or null]","searchAttempts":["Checked path directly","Searched nearby files with similar names","Reviewed task dependencies for renamed or moved files"]}],"user_decision_required":true,"suggested_options":["Provide the correct file path","Remove this Investigation Target and proceed","Update the task file with current paths"],"recommendation":"[Recommended next step based on what was found]"}
 ```
 
 #### 2-4. Dependency Version Uncertain Escalation
 When repository-wide verification is insufficient to determine the appropriate dependency version, escalate in following JSON format:
 
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "escalation_needed",
-  "reason": "Dependency version uncertain",
-  "taskName": "[Task name being executed]",
-  "escalation_type": "dependency_version_uncertain",
-  "dependency": {
-    "name": "[dependency name]",
-    "versionsFound": ["list of versions found in repository"],
-    "filesChecked": ["file paths where the dependency usage was found"],
-    "ambiguityReason": "[why repository state alone is insufficient]"
-  },
-  "user_decision_required": true,
-  "suggested_options": [
-    "Use the majority version already in the repository",
-    "Use a different version with explicit rationale",
-    "Research the latest stable version and decide after review"
-  ]
-}
+{"status":"escalation_needed","reason":"Dependency version uncertain","taskName":"[Task name being executed]","escalation_type":"dependency_version_uncertain","dependency":{"name":"[dependency name]","versionsFound":["list of versions found in repository"],"filesChecked":["file paths where the dependency usage was found"],"ambiguityReason":"[why repository state alone is insufficient]"},"user_decision_required":true,"suggested_options":["Use the majority version already in the repository","Use a different version with explicit rationale","Research the latest stable version and decide after review"]}
 ```
 
 #### 2-5. Binding Decision Violation Escalation
 When one or more Compliance Checks in the task's Binding Decisions section evaluate to `N` during pre-implementation, or to `N` or `Unknown` during completion, escalate in following JSON format:
 
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "escalation_needed",
-  "reason": "Binding decision violation",
-  "taskName": "[Task name being executed]",
-  "escalation_type": "binding_decision_violation",
-  "phase": "pre_implementation | completion_gate",
-  "implementationApproach": "[1-2 sentence summary of the planned or final implementation approach]",
-  "failures": [
-    {
-      "source": "[ADR file path with section hint, copied from Source column]",
-      "axis": "[Axis value copied from the Axis column]",
-      "decision": "[Decision text copied from Decision column]",
-      "complianceCheck": "[Compliance Check predicate copied from Compliance Check column]",
-      "evaluation": "N | Unknown",
-      "rationale": "[One line explaining why the implementation does not satisfy the check, or why it cannot be evaluated]"
-    }
-  ],
-  "user_decision_required": true,
-  "suggested_options": [
-    "Adjust the implementation plan to satisfy the binding decision",
-    "Update the ADR, then update the work plan ADR Bindings and task Binding Decisions",
-    "Provide additional context that resolves the Unknown evaluation"
-  ]
-}
+{"status":"escalation_needed","reason":"Binding decision violation","taskName":"[Task name being executed]","escalation_type":"binding_decision_violation","phase":"pre_implementation | completion_gate","implementationApproach":"[1-2 sentence summary of the planned or final implementation approach]","failures":[{"source":"[ADR file path with section hint, copied from Source column]","axis":"[Axis value copied from the Axis column]","decision":"[Decision text copied from Decision column]","complianceCheck":"[Compliance Check predicate copied from Compliance Check column]","evaluation":"N | Unknown","rationale":"[One line explaining why the implementation does not satisfy the check, or why it cannot be evaluated]"}],"user_decision_required":true,"suggested_options":["Adjust the implementation plan to satisfy the binding decision","Update the ADR, then update the work plan ADR Bindings and task Binding Decisions","Provide additional context that resolves the Unknown evaluation"]}
 ```
 
 #### 2-6. Test Environment Not Ready Escalation
@@ -397,16 +280,7 @@ When one or more Compliance Checks in the task's Binding Decisions section evalu
 Triggered when the Test Environment Check finds the project-configured test toolchain unavailable or unrunnable.
 
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "escalation_needed",
-  "reason": "Test environment not ready",
-  "taskName": "[Task name]",
-  "escalation_type": "test_environment_not_ready",
-  "missingComponent": "test runner | fixtures | mock server | setup file | other",
-  "description": "[why the missing component blocks tests]",
-  "user_decision_required": true,
-  "suggested_options": ["Install or configure the missing component, then re-run the task", "Reassign the task once the environment is ready"]
-}
+{"status":"escalation_needed","reason":"Test environment not ready","taskName":"[Task name]","escalation_type":"test_environment_not_ready","missingComponent":"test runner | fixtures | mock server | setup file | other","description":"[why the missing component blocks tests]","user_decision_required":true,"suggested_options":["Install or configure the missing component, then re-run the task","Reassign the task once the environment is ready"]}
 ```
 
 ## Execution Principles

package/.codex/agents/ui-analyzer.toml

@@ -126,163 +126,7 @@ Produce `candidateWriteSet[]` with likely modified files:
 Return a single JSON object as the final response:
 
 ```json
-{
-  "analysisScope": {
-    "filesAnalyzed": ["path/to/component.tsx"],
-    "stylesAnalyzed": ["path/to/styles.module.css"],
-    "uiConventions": {
-      "componentExtension": ".tsx",
-      "styleStrategy": "css-modules|vanilla-css|css-in-js|utility-classes|unknown",
-      "storybook": true,
-      "testRunner": "vitest|jest|other|unknown"
-    }
-  },
-  "externalResources": {
-    "status": "resolved|partial|not_recorded",
-    "designOrigin": {
-      "resource_status": "present|existing-implementation|not_applicable",
-      "resolution_status": "fetched|inspected_local|recorded_for_manual_confirmation|unavailable|not_applicable",
-      "accessMethod": "MCP name | URL | file path | existing implementation",
-      "summary": "brief description of resolved content"
-    },
-    "designSystem": {
-      "resource_status": "present|existing-package|not_applicable",
-      "resolution_status": "fetched|inspected_local|unavailable|not_applicable",
-      "accessMethod": "MCP name | URL | file path | package imports | local docs",
-      "summary": "components, tokens, and variants captured"
-    },
-    "guidelines": {
-      "resource_status": "present|project-conventions|not_applicable",
-      "resolution_status": "fetched|inspected_local|unavailable|not_applicable",
-      "accessMethod": "URL | file path | local docs | project conventions",
-      "summary": "rule categories captured"
-    },
-    "visualVerification": {
-      "resource_status": "present|manual-confirmation|not_applicable",
-      "resolution_status": "available|recorded_for_manual_confirmation|unavailable|not_applicable",
-      "accessMethod": "MCP name | URL | command | manual confirmation",
-      "notes": "rendering verification path"
-    },
-    "generatedUiArtifacts": {
-      "resource_status": "present|not_applicable",
-      "resolution_status": "inspected_local|available|unavailable|not_applicable",
-      "accessMethod": "command | config path | file path | package script",
-      "summary": "generated UI artifact source, trigger, and verification path"
-    },
-    "additionalResources": [
-      {
-        "label": "resource-label",
-        "description": "resource description",
-        "accessMethod": "URL | MCP name | file path | command | notes",
-        "resource_status": "present|existing-implementation|existing-package|project-conventions|manual-confirmation",
-        "resolution_status": "fetched|inspected_local|recorded_for_manual_confirmation|unavailable",
-        "summary": "facts relevant to the requested UI scope"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-  "componentStructure": [
-    {
-      "name": "ComponentName",
-      "filePath": "path/to/file:line",
-      "propsInterface": "name and brief shape",
-      "topLevelElement": "tag or component name",
-      "domOrder": ["child1", "child2"],
-      "conditionalBranches": [
-        {"predicate": "condition", "renderedSubtree": "brief description"}
-      ],
-      "callSites": ["path/to/consumer:line"]
-    }
-  ],
-  "propsPatterns": [
-    {
-      "component": "ComponentName",
-      "callSite": "path/to/file:line",
-      "props": {"variant": "primary"},
-      "computedProps": ["onClick"],
-      "groupKey": "primary"
-    }
-  ],
-  "cssLayout": [
-    {
-      "filePath": "path/to/styles.module.css",
-      "classNamingConvention": "camelCase|kebab-case|BEM|unknown",
-      "baseClass": "root",
-      "layouts": [
-        {
-          "selector": ".root",
-          "display": "flex|grid|block|unknown",
-          "direction": "row|column|grid-template|unknown",
-          "gap": "8px|none|unknown",
-          "wrap": "wrap|nowrap|absent|unknown",
-          "logicalProperties": true,
-          "stateSelectors": ["[data-state=active]"]
-        }
-      ],
-      "responsiveBreakpoints": ["768px"]
-    }
-  ],
-  "stateDisplay": [
-    {
-      "component": "ComponentName",
-      "states": [
-        {"name": "loading|empty|partial|error|ready|disabled", "trigger": "what causes this state", "renders": "brief description"}
-      ],
-      "unsupportedStates": ["state absent from current component"]
-    }
-  ],
-  "displayConditions": [
-    {
-      "component": "ComponentName",
-      "condition": "feature_flag|role|route|region|tenant|page_context",
-      "predicateLocation": "path/to/file:line",
-      "predicate": "expression",
-      "gatedSubtree": "brief description"
-    }
-  ],
-  "i18n": {
-    "format": "csv|json|code-catalog|other|none",
-    "structuralConventions": {},
-    "keyNamingConvention": "",
-    "locales": [],
-    "localeGaps": [],
-    "generatedTypings": {"command": "", "outputPath": ""}
-  },
-  "accessibility": [
-    {
-      "component": "ComponentName",
-      "ariaAttributes": ["role=button", "aria-label from prop"],
-      "keyboardHandling": "Enter and Space trigger action",
-      "focusStyling": "focus-visible outline",
-      "testCoverage": "axe checks present|absent|unknown"
-    }
-  ],
-  "generatedArtifacts": [
-    {
-      "kind": "css-module-typings|message-catalog-typings|route-typings|other",
-      "command": "generator command",
-      "trigger": "on source change|manual|unknown",
-      "consumers": ["typecheck", "test", "build", "runtime"],
-      "resourceRef": "externalResources.generatedUiArtifacts"
-    }
-  ],
-  "focusAreas": [
-    {
-      "fact_id": "path:identifier",
-      "area": "Brief UI area name",
-      "evidence": "componentStructure[name=...]",
-      "factsToAddress": "Concrete UI facts to respect",
-      "risk": "What inconsistency results if omitted"
-    }
-  ],
-  "candidateWriteSet": [
-    {
-      "path": "src/components/Card.tsx",
-      "reasonRef": "focusAreas[fact_id=...]",
-      "confidence": "high|medium|low"
-    }
-  ],
-  "limitations": []
-}
+{"analysisScope":{"filesAnalyzed":["path/to/component.tsx"],"stylesAnalyzed":["path/to/styles.module.css"],"uiConventions":{"componentExtension":".tsx","styleStrategy":"css-modules|vanilla-css|css-in-js|utility-classes|unknown","storybook":true,"testRunner":"vitest|jest|other|unknown"}},"externalResources":{"status":"resolved|partial|not_recorded","designOrigin":{"resource_status":"present|existing-implementation|not_applicable","resolution_status":"fetched|inspected_local|recorded_for_manual_confirmation|unavailable|not_applicable","accessMethod":"MCP name | URL | file path | existing implementation","summary":"brief description of resolved content"},"designSystem":{"resource_status":"present|existing-package|not_applicable","resolution_status":"fetched|inspected_local|unavailable|not_applicable","accessMethod":"MCP name | URL | file path | package imports | local docs","summary":"components, tokens, and variants captured"},"guidelines":{"resource_status":"present|project-conventions|not_applicable","resolution_status":"fetched|inspected_local|unavailable|not_applicable","accessMethod":"URL | file path | local docs | project conventions","summary":"rule categories captured"},"visualVerification":{"resource_status":"present|manual-confirmation|not_applicable","resolution_status":"available|recorded_for_manual_confirmation|unavailable|not_applicable","accessMethod":"MCP name | URL | command | manual confirmation","notes":"rendering verification path"},"generatedUiArtifacts":{"resource_status":"present|not_applicable","resolution_status":"inspected_local|available|unavailable|not_applicable","accessMethod":"command | config path | file path | package script","summary":"generated UI artifact source, trigger, and verification path"},"additionalResources":[{"label":"resource-label","description":"resource description","accessMethod":"URL | MCP name | file path | command | notes","resource_status":"present|existing-implementation|existing-package|project-conventions|manual-confirmation","resolution_status":"fetched|inspected_local|recorded_for_manual_confirmation|unavailable","summary":"facts relevant to the requested UI scope"}]},"componentStructure":[{"name":"ComponentName","filePath":"path/to/file:line","propsInterface":"name and brief shape","topLevelElement":"tag or component name","domOrder":["child1","child2"],"conditionalBranches":[{"predicate":"condition","renderedSubtree":"brief description"}],"callSites":["path/to/consumer:line"]}],"propsPatterns":[{"component":"ComponentName","callSite":"path/to/file:line","props":{"variant":"primary"},"computedProps":["onClick"],"groupKey":"primary"}],"cssLayout":[{"filePath":"path/to/styles.module.css","classNamingConvention":"camelCase|kebab-case|BEM|unknown","baseClass":"root","layouts":[{"selector":".root","display":"flex|grid|block|unknown","direction":"row|column|grid-template|unknown","gap":"8px|none|unknown","wrap":"wrap|nowrap|absent|unknown","logicalProperties":true,"stateSelectors":["[data-state=active]"]}],"responsiveBreakpoints":["768px"]}],"stateDisplay":[{"component":"ComponentName","states":[{"name":"loading|empty|partial|error|ready|disabled","trigger":"what causes this state","renders":"brief description"}],"unsupportedStates":["state absent from current component"]}],"displayConditions":[{"component":"ComponentName","condition":"feature_flag|role|route|region|tenant|page_context","predicateLocation":"path/to/file:line","predicate":"expression","gatedSubtree":"brief description"}],"i18n":{"format":"csv|json|code-catalog|other|none","structuralConventions":{},"keyNamingConvention":"","locales":[],"localeGaps":[],"generatedTypings":{"command":"","outputPath":""}},"accessibility":[{"component":"ComponentName","ariaAttributes":["role=button","aria-label from prop"],"keyboardHandling":"Enter and Space trigger action","focusStyling":"focus-visible outline","testCoverage":"axe checks present|absent|unknown"}],"generatedArtifacts":[{"kind":"css-module-typings|message-catalog-typings|route-typings|other","command":"generator command","trigger":"on source change|manual|unknown","consumers":["typecheck","test","build","runtime"],"resourceRef":"externalResources.generatedUiArtifacts"}],"focusAreas":[{"fact_id":"path:identifier","area":"Brief UI area name","evidence":"componentStructure[name=...]","factsToAddress":"Concrete UI facts to respect","risk":"What inconsistency results if omitted"}],"candidateWriteSet":[{"path":"src/components/Card.tsx","reasonRef":"focusAreas[fact_id=...]","confidence":"high|medium|low"}],"limitations":[]}
 ```
 
 ## Quality Checklist

package/.codex/agents/verifier.toml

@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ Record each supplementary finding and its impact on the existing failure points
 - Check whether the mapped execution path adequately covers the observed symptom from entry to failure
 - Identify uncovered boundaries or unverified nodes that could hide additional failure points
 - Evaluate at least 2 additional path segments or boundaries beyond the investigator's original failure-point list
+- When the investigated incident is a bug or regression, or when a failure point affects a state transition, persisted state, or external boundary, trace adjacent cases sharing the same path, contract, persisted state, or external boundary and evaluate whether they carry the same class of defect
 - Evaluate each failure point independently:
   - Is the supporting evidence sufficient?
   - Is there direct counter-evidence?
@@ -125,71 +126,7 @@ Return the JSON result as the final response. See Output Format for the schema.
 **JSON format is mandatory.**
 
 ```json
-{
-  "investigationReview": {
-    "originalFailurePointCount": 3,
-    "coverageAssessment": "sufficient|partial|insufficient",
-    "identifiedGaps": ["Perspectives overlooked in investigation"]
-  },
-  "triangulationSupplements": [
-    {
-      "source": "Additional information source investigated",
-      "findings": "Content discovered",
-      "impactOnFailurePoints": "Impact on existing failure points"
-    }
-  ],
-  "scopeValidation": {
-    "verified": true,
-    "concerns": ["Concerns"]
-  },
-  "externalResearch": [
-    {
-      "query": "Search query used",
-      "source": "Information source",
-      "findings": "Related information discovered",
-      "impactOnFailurePoints": "Impact on failure points"
-    }
-  ],
-  "additionalFailurePoints": [
-    {
-      "id": "AFP1",
-      "description": "Additional failure point description",
-      "rationale": "Why this failure point was considered",
-      "evidence": {"supporting": [], "contradicting": []},
-      "plausibility": "high|medium|low"
-    }
-  ],
-  "pathCoverageFindings": [
-    {
-      "nodeId": "N1",
-      "status": "covered|partially_covered|uncovered",
-      "findings": "Coverage finding",
-      "followUpNeeded": ["Needed follow-up"]
-    }
-  ],
-  "failurePointsEvaluation": [
-    {
-      "failurePointId": "FP1 or AFP1",
-      "description": "Failure point description",
-      "verificationLevel": "speculation|indirect|direct|verified",
-      "refutationStatus": "unrefuted|partially_refuted|refuted",
-      "remainingUncertainty": ["Remaining uncertainty"]
-    }
-  ],
-  "conclusion": {
-    "confirmedFailurePoints": [
-      {"failurePointId": "FP1", "status": "confirmed|probable|possible", "originalCheckStatus": "retained|added_by_verifier|null"}
-    ],
-    "failurePointRelationships": [
-      {"from": "FP1", "to": "FP2", "relationship": "independent|upstream_of|downstream_of|amplifies|same_boundary"}
-    ],
-    "finalStatus": "ready_for_solution|needs_more_investigation",
-    "coverageAssessment": "sufficient|partial|insufficient",
-    "statusRationale": "Rationale for status and coverage level",
-    "recommendedVerification": ["Additional verification needed to confirm conclusion"]
-  },
-  "verificationLimitations": ["Limitations of this verification process"]
-}
+{"investigationReview":{"originalFailurePointCount":3,"coverageAssessment":"sufficient|partial|insufficient","identifiedGaps":["Perspectives overlooked in investigation"]},"triangulationSupplements":[{"source":"Additional information source investigated","findings":"Content discovered","impactOnFailurePoints":"Impact on existing failure points"}],"scopeValidation":{"verified":true,"concerns":["Concerns"]},"externalResearch":[{"query":"Search query used","source":"Information source","findings":"Related information discovered","impactOnFailurePoints":"Impact on failure points"}],"additionalFailurePoints":[{"id":"AFP1","description":"Additional failure point description","rationale":"Why this failure point was considered","evidence":{"supporting":[],"contradicting":[]},"plausibility":"high|medium|low"}],"pathCoverageFindings":[{"nodeId":"N1","status":"covered|partially_covered|uncovered","findings":"Coverage finding","followUpNeeded":["Needed follow-up"]}],"failurePointsEvaluation":[{"failurePointId":"FP1 or AFP1","description":"Failure point description","verificationLevel":"speculation|indirect|direct|verified","refutationStatus":"unrefuted|partially_refuted|refuted","remainingUncertainty":["Remaining uncertainty"]}],"conclusion":{"confirmedFailurePoints":[{"failurePointId":"FP1","status":"confirmed|probable|possible","originalCheckStatus":"retained|added_by_verifier|null"}],"failurePointRelationships":[{"from":"FP1","to":"FP2","relationship":"independent|upstream_of|downstream_of|amplifies|same_boundary"}],"finalStatus":"ready_for_solution|needs_more_investigation","coverageAssessment":"sufficient|partial|insufficient","statusRationale":"Rationale for status and coverage level","recommendedVerification":["Additional verification needed to confirm conclusion"]},"verificationLimitations":["Limitations of this verification process"]}
 ```
 
 ## Completion Criteria

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "codex-workflows",
-  "version": "0.6.8",
+  "version": "0.6.9",
   "description": "Task-oriented agentic coding framework for OpenAI Codex CLI — skills, recipes, and subagents for structured development workflows",
   "license": "MIT",
   "author": "Shinsuke Kagawa",