codex-workflows 0.6.8 → 0.6.9

package/.codex/agents/document-reviewer.toml

@@ -186,73 +186,13 @@ Complete all items before proceeding to output.
 ### Comprehensive Review Mode
 
 ```json
-{
-  "metadata": {
-    "review_mode": "comprehensive",
-    "doc_type": "DesignDoc",
-    "target_path": "/path/to/document.md"
-  },
-  "scores": {
-    "consistency": 85,
-    "completeness": 80,
-    "rule_compliance": 90,
-    "clarity": 75
-  },
-  "gate0": {
-    "status": "pass|fail",
-    "missing_elements": []
-  },
-  "verdict": {
-    "decision": "approved_with_conditions",
-    "conditions": [
-      "Resolve FileUtil discrepancy",
-      "Add missing test files"
-    ]
-  },
-  "issues": [
-    {
-      "id": "I001",
-      "severity": "critical",
-      "category": "implementation",
-      "location": "Section 3.2",
-      "description": "FileUtil method mismatch",
-      "suggestion": "Update document to reflect actual FileUtil usage"
-    }
-  ],
-  "recommendations": [
-    "Priority fixes before approval",
-    "Documentation alignment with implementation"
-  ],
-  "prior_context_check": {
-    "items_received": 0,
-    "resolved": 0,
-    "partially_resolved": 0,
-    "unresolved": 0,
-    "items": []
-  }
-}
+{"metadata":{"review_mode":"comprehensive","doc_type":"DesignDoc","target_path":"/path/to/document.md"},"scores":{"consistency":85,"completeness":80,"rule_compliance":90,"clarity":75},"gate0":{"status":"pass|fail","missing_elements":[]},"verdict":{"decision":"approved_with_conditions","conditions":["Resolve FileUtil discrepancy","Add missing test files"]},"issues":[{"id":"I001","severity":"critical","category":"implementation","location":"Section 3.2","description":"FileUtil method mismatch","suggestion":"Update document to reflect actual FileUtil usage"}],"recommendations":["Priority fixes before approval","Documentation alignment with implementation"],"prior_context_check":{"items_received":0,"resolved":0,"partially_resolved":0,"unresolved":0,"items":[]}}
 ```
 
 ### Perspective-specific Mode
 
 ```json
-{
-  "metadata": {
-    "review_mode": "perspective",
-    "focus": "implementation",
-    "doc_type": "DesignDoc",
-    "target_path": "/path/to/document.md"
-  },
-  "analysis": {
-    "summary": "Analysis results description",
-    "scores": {}
-  },
-  "issues": [],
-  "checklist": [
-    {"item": "Check item description", "status": "pass|fail|na"}
-  ],
-  "recommendations": []
-}
+{"metadata":{"review_mode":"perspective","focus":"implementation","doc_type":"DesignDoc","target_path":"/path/to/document.md"},"analysis":{"summary":"Analysis results description","scores":{}},"issues":[],"checklist":[{"item":"Check item description","status":"pass|fail|na"}],"recommendations":[]}
 ```
 
 ### Prior Context Check
@@ -260,22 +200,7 @@ Complete all items before proceeding to output.
 Include in output when `prior_context_count > 0`:
 
 ```json
-{
-  "prior_context_check": {
-    "items_received": 3,
-    "resolved": 2,
-    "partially_resolved": 1,
-    "unresolved": 0,
-    "items": [
-      {
-        "id": "D001",
-        "status": "resolved",
-        "location": "Section 3.2",
-        "evidence": "Code now matches documentation"
-      }
-    ]
-  }
-}
+{"prior_context_check":{"items_received":3,"resolved":2,"partially_resolved":1,"unresolved":0,"items":[{"id":"D001","status":"resolved","location":"Section 3.2","evidence":"Code now matches documentation"}]}}
 ```
 
 ## Review Checklist (for Comprehensive Mode)

package/.codex/agents/integration-test-reviewer.toml

@@ -100,32 +100,7 @@ Return the JSON result as the final response. See Output Format for the schema.
 ## Output Format
 
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "approved|needs_revision|blocked",
-  "testFile": "[path]",
-  "verdict": {
-    "decision": "approved|needs_revision|blocked",
-    "summary": "[1-2 sentence summary]"
-  },
-  "testsReviewed": 5,
-  "passedTests": 3,
-  "failedTests": 2,
-  "qualityIssues": [
-    {
-      "testName": "[test name]",
-      "issueType": "skeleton_mismatch|aaa_violation|independence_violation|mock_boundary|proof_insufficient|readability",
-      "severity": "high|medium|low",
-      "description": "[specific issue]",
-      "skeletonExpected": "[what skeleton specified]",
-      "actualImplementation": "[what was found]",
-      "suggestion": "[specific fix]"
-    }
-  ],
-  "requiredFixes": [
-    "[specific fix 1]",
-    "[specific fix 2]"
-  ]
-}
+{"status":"approved|needs_revision|blocked","testFile":"[path]","verdict":{"decision":"approved|needs_revision|blocked","summary":"[1-2 sentence summary]"},"testsReviewed":5,"passedTests":3,"failedTests":2,"qualityIssues":[{"testName":"[test name]","issueType":"skeleton_mismatch|aaa_violation|independence_violation|mock_boundary|proof_insufficient|readability","severity":"high|medium|low","description":"[specific issue]","skeletonExpected":"[what skeleton specified]","actualImplementation":"[what was found]","suggestion":"[specific fix]"}],"requiredFixes":["[specific fix 1]","[specific fix 2]"]}
 ```
 
 ## Status Determination

package/.codex/agents/investigator.toml

@@ -119,79 +119,7 @@ Return the JSON result as the final response. See Output Format for the schema.
 **JSON format is mandatory.**
 
 ```json
-{
-  "problemSummary": {
-    "phenomenon": "Objective description of observed phenomenon",
-    "context": "Occurrence conditions, environment, timing",
-    "scope": "Impact range"
-  },
-  "investigationSources": [
-    {
-      "type": "code|history|dependency|config|document|external",
-      "location": "Location investigated",
-      "findings": "Facts discovered (without interpretation)"
-    }
-  ],
-  "externalResearch": [
-    {
-      "query": "Search query used",
-      "source": "Information source",
-      "findings": "Related information discovered",
-      "relevance": "Relevance to this problem"
-    }
-  ],
-  "pathMap": {
-    "entryPoint": "First relevant execution entry",
-    "nodes": [
-      {
-        "id": "N1",
-        "stage": "route_entry|service_entry|validation|persistence_read|persistence_write|external_call|render|other",
-        "component": "Component or file path",
-        "description": "Role on the execution path",
-        "status": "observed|inferred|unverified"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-  "failurePoints": [
-    {
-      "id": "FP1",
-      "nodeId": "N1",
-      "description": "Specific failure point description",
-      "causeCategory": "typo|logic_error|missing_constraint|design_gap|external_factor",
-      "causalChain": ["Phenomenon", "→ Direct cause", "→ Root cause"],
-      "supportingEvidence": [
-        {"evidence": "Evidence", "source": "Source", "strength": "direct|indirect|circumstantial"}
-      ],
-      "contradictingEvidence": [
-        {"evidence": "Counter-evidence", "source": "Source", "impact": "Impact on this failure point"}
-      ],
-      "unexploredAspects": ["Unverified aspects"]
-    }
-  ],
-  "comparisonAnalysis": {
-    "normalImplementation": "Path to working implementation (null if not found)",
-    "failingImplementation": "Path to problematic implementation",
-    "keyDifferences": ["Differences"]
-  },
-  "impactAnalysis": {
-    "causeCategory": "typo|logic_error|missing_constraint|design_gap|external_factor",
-    "impactScope": ["Affected file paths"],
-    "recurrenceRisk": "low|medium|high",
-    "riskRationale": "Rationale for risk determination"
-  },
-  "unexploredAreas": [
-    {"area": "Unexplored area", "reason": "Reason could not investigate", "potentialRelevance": "Relevance"}
-  ],
-  "failurePointRelationships": [
-    {
-      "from": "FP1",
-      "to": "FP2",
-      "relationship": "independent|upstream_of|downstream_of|amplifies|same_boundary"
-    }
-  ],
-  "factualObservations": ["Objective facts observed regardless of failure-point classification"],
-  "investigationLimitations": ["Limitations and constraints of this investigation"]
-}
+{"problemSummary":{"phenomenon":"Objective description of observed phenomenon","context":"Occurrence conditions, environment, timing","scope":"Impact range"},"investigationSources":[{"type":"code|history|dependency|config|document|external","location":"Location investigated","findings":"Facts discovered (without interpretation)"}],"externalResearch":[{"query":"Search query used","source":"Information source","findings":"Related information discovered","relevance":"Relevance to this problem"}],"pathMap":{"entryPoint":"First relevant execution entry","nodes":[{"id":"N1","stage":"route_entry|service_entry|validation|persistence_read|persistence_write|external_call|render|other","component":"Component or file path","description":"Role on the execution path","status":"observed|inferred|unverified"}]},"failurePoints":[{"id":"FP1","nodeId":"N1","description":"Specific failure point description","causeCategory":"typo|logic_error|missing_constraint|design_gap|external_factor","causalChain":["Phenomenon","→ Direct cause","→ Root cause"],"supportingEvidence":[{"evidence":"Evidence","source":"Source","strength":"direct|indirect|circumstantial"}],"contradictingEvidence":[{"evidence":"Counter-evidence","source":"Source","impact":"Impact on this failure point"}],"unexploredAspects":["Unverified aspects"]}],"comparisonAnalysis":{"normalImplementation":"Path to working implementation (null if not found)","failingImplementation":"Path to problematic implementation","keyDifferences":["Differences"]},"impactAnalysis":{"causeCategory":"typo|logic_error|missing_constraint|design_gap|external_factor","impactScope":["Affected file paths"],"recurrenceRisk":"low|medium|high","riskRationale":"Rationale for risk determination"},"unexploredAreas":[{"area":"Unexplored area","reason":"Reason could not investigate","potentialRelevance":"Relevance"}],"failurePointRelationships":[{"from":"FP1","to":"FP2","relationship":"independent|upstream_of|downstream_of|amplifies|same_boundary"}],"factualObservations":["Objective facts observed regardless of failure-point classification"],"investigationLimitations":["Limitations and constraints of this investigation"]}
 ```
 
 ## Completion Criteria

package/.codex/agents/quality-fixer-frontend.toml

@@ -185,123 +185,22 @@ Before setting status to blocked, confirm specifications in this order:
 
 **When incomplete implementation is detected**:
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "stub_detected",
-  "summary": "Incomplete frontend implementation detected in changed code before quality checks.",
-  "stubFindings": [
-    {
-      "file": "src/components/CheckoutButton.tsx",
-      "indicator": "placeholder handler",
-      "details": "onClick handler still contains placeholder logic for required submission flow"
-    }
-  ],
-  "nextActions": "Return to task-executor-frontend and complete the implementation before re-running quality-fixer-frontend."
-}
+{"status":"stub_detected","summary":"Incomplete frontend implementation detected in changed code before quality checks.","stubFindings":[{"file":"src/components/CheckoutButton.tsx","indicator":"placeholder handler","details":"onClick handler still contains placeholder logic for required submission flow"}],"nextActions":"Return to task-executor-frontend and complete the implementation before re-running quality-fixer-frontend."}
 ```
 
 **When quality check succeeds**:
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "approved",
-  "summary": "Overall frontend quality check completed. All checks passed.",
-  "checksPerformed": {
-    "lint_format": {
-      "status": "passed",
-      "commands": ["<detected-lint-command>"],
-      "autoFixed": true
-    },
-    "typescript": {
-      "status": "passed",
-      "commands": ["<detected-build-command>"]
-    },
-    "tests": {
-      "status": "passed",
-      "commands": ["<detected-test-command>"],
-      "testsRun": 42,
-      "testsPassed": 42,
-      "coverage": "85%"
-    }
-  },
-  "fixesApplied": [
-    {
-      "type": "auto",
-      "category": "format",
-      "description": "Auto-fixed indentation and semicolons",
-      "filesCount": 5
-    },
-    {
-      "type": "manual",
-      "category": "type",
-      "description": "Replaced any type with unknown + type guards",
-      "filesCount": 3
-    }
-  ],
-  "taskFileMechanisms": {
-    "provided": true,
-    "executed": ["mechanism names that were found and executed"],
-    "skipped": [
-      {
-        "mechanism": "mechanism name",
-        "reason": "tool not found / config not found / not executable"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-  "metrics": {
-    "totalErrors": 0,
-    "totalWarnings": 0,
-    "executionTime": "3m 30s"
-  },
-  "nextActions": "Ready to commit"
-}
+{"status":"approved","summary":"Overall frontend quality check completed. All checks passed.","checksPerformed":{"lint_format":{"status":"passed","commands":["<detected-lint-command>"],"autoFixed":true},"typescript":{"status":"passed","commands":["<detected-build-command>"]},"tests":{"status":"passed","commands":["<detected-test-command>"],"testsRun":42,"testsPassed":42,"coverage":"85%"}},"fixesApplied":[{"type":"auto","category":"format","description":"Auto-fixed indentation and semicolons","filesCount":5},{"type":"manual","category":"type","description":"Replaced any type with unknown + type guards","filesCount":3}],"taskFileMechanisms":{"provided":true,"executed":["mechanism names that were found and executed"],"skipped":[{"mechanism":"mechanism name","reason":"tool not found / config not found / not executable"}]},"metrics":{"totalErrors":0,"totalWarnings":0,"executionTime":"3m 30s"},"nextActions":"Ready to commit"}
 ```
 
 **blocked response format (specification conflict)**:
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "blocked",
-  "reason": "Cannot determine due to unclear specification",
-  "blockingIssues": [{
-    "type": "ux_specification_conflict",
-    "details": "Test expectation and implementation contradict on user interaction behavior",
-    "test_expects": "Button disabled on form error",
-    "implementation_behavior": "Button enabled, shows error on click",
-    "why_cannot_judge": "Correct UX specification unknown"
-  }],
-  "attemptedFixes": [
-    "Fix attempt 1: Tried aligning test to implementation",
-    "Fix attempt 2: Tried aligning implementation to test",
-    "Fix attempt 3: Tried inferring specification from Design Doc"
-  ],
-  "taskFileMechanisms": {
-    "provided": true,
-    "executed": ["mechanisms executed before blocking"],
-    "skipped": [{ "mechanism": "mechanism name", "reason": "tool not found / config not found / not executable" }]
-  },
-  "needsUserDecision": "Please confirm the correct button disabled behavior"
-}
+{"status":"blocked","reason":"Cannot determine due to unclear specification","blockingIssues":[{"type":"ux_specification_conflict","details":"Test expectation and implementation contradict on user interaction behavior","test_expects":"Button disabled on form error","implementation_behavior":"Button enabled, shows error on click","why_cannot_judge":"Correct UX specification unknown"}],"attemptedFixes":["Fix attempt 1: Tried aligning test to implementation","Fix attempt 2: Tried aligning implementation to test","Fix attempt 3: Tried inferring specification from Design Doc"],"taskFileMechanisms":{"provided":true,"executed":["mechanisms executed before blocking"],"skipped":[{"mechanism":"mechanism name","reason":"tool not found / config not found / not executable"}]},"needsUserDecision":"Please confirm the correct button disabled behavior"}
 ```
 
 **blocked response format (missing prerequisites)**:
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "blocked",
-  "reason": "Execution prerequisites not met",
-  "missingPrerequisites": [
-    {
-      "type": "browser_runtime",
-      "description": "Playwright browsers are not installed for E2E execution",
-      "affectedChecks": ["test:e2e"],
-      "resolutionSteps": ["Install the required browser runtime", "Re-run the E2E check command"]
-    }
-  ],
-  "taskFileMechanisms": {
-    "provided": true,
-    "executed": ["mechanisms executed before blocking"],
-    "skipped": [{ "mechanism": "mechanism name", "reason": "tool not found / config not found / not executable" }]
-  },
-  "checksSkipped": 1,
-  "checksPassedWithoutPrerequisites": 2
-}
+{"status":"blocked","reason":"Execution prerequisites not met","missingPrerequisites":[{"type":"browser_runtime","description":"Playwright browsers are not installed for E2E execution","affectedChecks":["test:e2e"],"resolutionSteps":["Install the required browser runtime","Re-run the E2E check command"]}],"taskFileMechanisms":{"provided":true,"executed":["mechanisms executed before blocking"],"skipped":[{"mechanism":"mechanism name","reason":"tool not found / config not found / not executable"}]},"checksSkipped":1,"checksPassedWithoutPrerequisites":2}
 ```
 
 Allowed `type` values: `seed_data`, `library`, `environment_variable`, `running_service`, `browser_runtime`, `external_dependency`, `other`

package/.codex/agents/quality-fixer.toml

@@ -158,140 +158,22 @@ Return one of the following as the final response (see Output Format for schemas
 
 **When incomplete implementation is detected**:
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "stub_detected",
-  "summary": "Incomplete implementation detected in changed code before quality checks.",
-  "stubFindings": [
-    {
-      "file": "src/example.ts",
-      "indicator": "TODO marker",
-      "details": "TODO comment defers required business logic in the task scope"
-    }
-  ],
-  "nextActions": "Return to task-executor and complete the implementation before re-running quality-fixer."
-}
+{"status":"stub_detected","summary":"Incomplete implementation detected in changed code before quality checks.","stubFindings":[{"file":"src/example.ts","indicator":"TODO marker","details":"TODO comment defers required business logic in the task scope"}],"nextActions":"Return to task-executor and complete the implementation before re-running quality-fixer."}
 ```
 
 **When quality check succeeds**:
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "approved",
-  "summary": "Overall quality check completed. All checks passed.",
-  "checksPerformed": {
-    "phase1_linting": {
-      "status": "passed",
-      "commands": ["linting", "formatting"],
-      "autoFixed": true
-    },
-    "phase2_structure": {
-      "status": "passed",
-      "commands": ["unused code check", "dependency check"]
-    },
-    "phase3_build": {
-      "status": "passed",
-      "commands": ["build"]
-    },
-    "phase4_tests": {
-      "status": "passed",
-      "commands": ["test"],
-      "testsRun": 42,
-      "testsPassed": 42
-    },
-    "phase5_code_recheck": {
-      "status": "passed",
-      "commands": ["code quality re-check"]
-    }
-  },
-  "fixesApplied": [
-    {
-      "type": "auto",
-      "category": "format",
-      "description": "Auto-fixed indentation and style",
-      "filesCount": 5
-    },
-    {
-      "type": "manual",
-      "category": "correctness",
-      "description": "Improved correctness guarantees",
-      "filesCount": 2
-    }
-  ],
-  "taskFileMechanisms": {
-    "provided": true,
-    "executed": ["mechanism names that were found and executed"],
-    "skipped": [
-      {
-        "mechanism": "mechanism name",
-        "reason": "tool not found / config not found / not executable"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-  "metrics": {
-    "totalErrors": 0,
-    "totalWarnings": 0,
-    "executionTime": "2m 15s"
-  },
-  "nextActions": "Ready to commit"
-}
+{"status":"approved","summary":"Overall quality check completed. All checks passed.","checksPerformed":{"phase1_linting":{"status":"passed","commands":["linting","formatting"],"autoFixed":true},"phase2_structure":{"status":"passed","commands":["unused code check","dependency check"]},"phase3_build":{"status":"passed","commands":["build"]},"phase4_tests":{"status":"passed","commands":["test"],"testsRun":42,"testsPassed":42},"phase5_code_recheck":{"status":"passed","commands":["code quality re-check"]}},"fixesApplied":[{"type":"auto","category":"format","description":"Auto-fixed indentation and style","filesCount":5},{"type":"manual","category":"correctness","description":"Improved correctness guarantees","filesCount":2}],"taskFileMechanisms":{"provided":true,"executed":["mechanism names that were found and executed"],"skipped":[{"mechanism":"mechanism name","reason":"tool not found / config not found / not executable"}]},"metrics":{"totalErrors":0,"totalWarnings":0,"executionTime":"2m 15s"},"nextActions":"Ready to commit"}
 ```
 
 **blocked response format (specification conflict)**:
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "blocked",
-  "reason": "Cannot determine due to unclear specification",
-  "blockingIssues": [{
-    "type": "specification_conflict",
-    "details": "Test expectation and implementation contradict",
-    "test_expects": "500 error",
-    "implementation_returns": "400 error",
-    "why_cannot_judge": "Correct specification unknown"
-  }],
-  "attemptedFixes": [
-    "Fix attempt 1: Tried aligning test to implementation",
-    "Fix attempt 2: Tried aligning implementation to test",
-    "Fix attempt 3: Tried inferring specification from related documentation"
-  ],
-  "taskFileMechanisms": {
-    "provided": true,
-    "executed": ["mechanisms executed before blocking"],
-    "skipped": [
-      {
-        "mechanism": "mechanism name",
-        "reason": "tool not found / config not found / not executable"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-  "needsUserDecision": "Please confirm the correct error code"
-}
+{"status":"blocked","reason":"Cannot determine due to unclear specification","blockingIssues":[{"type":"specification_conflict","details":"Test expectation and implementation contradict","test_expects":"500 error","implementation_returns":"400 error","why_cannot_judge":"Correct specification unknown"}],"attemptedFixes":["Fix attempt 1: Tried aligning test to implementation","Fix attempt 2: Tried aligning implementation to test","Fix attempt 3: Tried inferring specification from related documentation"],"taskFileMechanisms":{"provided":true,"executed":["mechanisms executed before blocking"],"skipped":[{"mechanism":"mechanism name","reason":"tool not found / config not found / not executable"}]},"needsUserDecision":"Please confirm the correct error code"}
 ```
 
 **blocked response format (missing prerequisites)**:
 ```json
-{
-  "status": "blocked",
-  "reason": "Execution prerequisites not met",
-  "missingPrerequisites": [
-    {
-      "type": "seed_data",
-      "description": "E2E database is missing required seeded user records",
-      "affectedChecks": ["test:e2e"],
-      "resolutionSteps": ["Run the project seed script for E2E fixtures", "Start the dependent local services"]
-    }
-  ],
-  "taskFileMechanisms": {
-    "provided": true,
-    "executed": ["mechanisms executed before blocking"],
-    "skipped": [
-      {
-        "mechanism": "mechanism name",
-        "reason": "tool not found / config not found / not executable"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-  "checksSkipped": 1,
-  "checksPassedWithoutPrerequisites": 3
-}
+{"status":"blocked","reason":"Execution prerequisites not met","missingPrerequisites":[{"type":"seed_data","description":"E2E database is missing required seeded user records","affectedChecks":["test:e2e"],"resolutionSteps":["Run the project seed script for E2E fixtures","Start the dependent local services"]}],"taskFileMechanisms":{"provided":true,"executed":["mechanisms executed before blocking"],"skipped":[{"mechanism":"mechanism name","reason":"tool not found / config not found / not executable"}]},"checksSkipped":1,"checksPassedWithoutPrerequisites":3}
 ```
 
 Allowed `type` values: `seed_data`, `library`, `environment_variable`, `running_service`, `external_dependency`, `other`

package/.codex/agents/requirement-analyzer.toml

@@ -120,35 +120,7 @@ Return the JSON result as the final response. See Output Format for the schema.
 **JSON format is mandatory.**
 
 ```json
-{
-  "taskType": "feature|fix|refactor|performance|security",
-  "purpose": "Essential purpose of request (1-2 sentences)",
-  "scale": "small|medium|large",
-  "confidence": "confirmed|provisional",
-  "affectedFiles": ["path/to/file1.ts", "path/to/file2.ts"],
-  "affectedLayers": ["backend", "frontend"],
-  "fileCount": 3,
-  "adrRequired": true,
-  "adrReason": "specific condition met, or null if not required",
-  "technicalConsiderations": {
-    "constraints": ["list"],
-    "risks": ["list"],
-    "dependencies": ["list"]
-  },
-  "scopeDependencies": [
-    {
-      "question": "specific question that affects scale",
-      "impact": { "if_yes": "large", "if_no": "medium" }
-    }
-  ],
-  "questions": [
-    {
-      "category": "boundary|existing_code|dependencies",
-      "question": "specific question",
-      "options": ["A", "B", "C"]
-    }
-  ]
-}
+{"taskType":"feature|fix|refactor|performance|security","purpose":"Essential purpose of request (1-2 sentences)","scale":"small|medium|large","confidence":"confirmed|provisional","affectedFiles":["path/to/file1.ts","path/to/file2.ts"],"affectedLayers":["backend","frontend"],"fileCount":3,"adrRequired":true,"adrReason":"specific condition met, or null if not required","technicalConsiderations":{"constraints":["list"],"risks":["list"],"dependencies":["list"]},"scopeDependencies":[{"question":"specific question that affects scale","impact":{"if_yes":"large","if_no":"medium"}}],"questions":[{"category":"boundary|existing_code|dependencies","question":"specific question","options":["A","B","C"]}]}
 ```
 
 **Field descriptions**:

package/.codex/agents/rule-advisor.toml

@@ -73,85 +73,7 @@ Return the JSON result as the final response. See Output Format for the schema.
 Return structured JSON:
 
 ```json
-{
-  "taskAnalysis": {
-    "taskType": "implementation|fix|refactoring|design|quality-improvement",
-    "essence": "Fundamental purpose of the task",
-    "estimatedFiles": 3,
-    "scale": "small|medium|large",
-    "extractedTags": ["implementation", "testing", "security"]
-  },
-  "selectedRules": [
-    {
-      "file": "coding-rules",
-      "sections": [
-        {
-          "title": "Function Design",
-          "content": "## Function Design\\n\\n### Basic Principles\\n- Single responsibility principle\\n..."
-        },
-        {
-          "title": "Error Handling",
-          "content": "## Error Handling\\n\\n### Error Classification\\n..."
-        }
-      ],
-      "reason": "Core implementation rules needed",
-      "priority": "high"
-    },
-    {
-      "file": "testing",
-      "sections": [
-        {
-          "title": "Red-Green-Refactor Process",
-          "content": "## Red-Green-Refactor Process\\n\\n1. Red: Write failing test\\n..."
-        }
-      ],
-      "reason": "TDD practice required",
-      "priority": "high"
-    }
-  ],
-  "metaCognitiveGuidance": {
-    "taskEssence": "Understanding fundamental purpose, not surface work",
-    "ruleAdequacy": "Evaluation of whether selected rules match task characteristics",
-    "pastFailures": [
-      "error-fixing impulse",
-      "large changes at once",
-      "insufficient testing"
-    ],
-    "potentialPitfalls": [
-      "Error-fixing impulse without root cause analysis",
-      "Large changes without phased approach",
-      "Implementation without tests"
-    ],
-    "firstStep": {
-      "action": "Specific first action to take",
-      "rationale": "Why this should be done first"
-    }
-  },
-  "metaCognitiveQuestions": [
-    "What is the most important quality criterion for this task?",
-    "What problems occurred in similar tasks in the past?",
-    "Which part should be tackled first?",
-    "Is there a possibility of exceeding initial assumptions?"
-  ],
-  "warningPatterns": [
-    {
-      "pattern": "Large changes at once",
-      "risk": "High complexity, difficult debugging",
-      "mitigation": "Split into phases"
-    },
-    {
-      "pattern": "Implementation without tests",
-      "risk": "Quality degradation",
-      "mitigation": "Follow Red-Green-Refactor"
-    }
-  ],
-  "criticalRules": [
-    "Complete static checking before proceeding",
-    "User approval mandatory before implementation",
-    "No commits before quality check completion"
-  ],
-  "confidence": "high|medium|low"
-}
+{"taskAnalysis":{"taskType":"implementation|fix|refactoring|design|quality-improvement","essence":"Fundamental purpose of the task","estimatedFiles":3,"scale":"small|medium|large","extractedTags":["implementation","testing","security"]},"selectedRules":[{"file":"coding-rules","sections":[{"title":"Function Design","content":"## Function Design\\n\\n### Basic Principles\\n- Single responsibility principle\\n..."},{"title":"Error Handling","content":"## Error Handling\\n\\n### Error Classification\\n..."}],"reason":"Core implementation rules needed","priority":"high"},{"file":"testing","sections":[{"title":"Red-Green-Refactor Process","content":"## Red-Green-Refactor Process\\n\\n1. Red: Write failing test\\n..."}],"reason":"TDD practice required","priority":"high"}],"metaCognitiveGuidance":{"taskEssence":"Understanding fundamental purpose, not surface work","ruleAdequacy":"Evaluation of whether selected rules match task characteristics","pastFailures":["error-fixing impulse","large changes at once","insufficient testing"],"potentialPitfalls":["Error-fixing impulse without root cause analysis","Large changes without phased approach","Implementation without tests"],"firstStep":{"action":"Specific first action to take","rationale":"Why this should be done first"}},"metaCognitiveQuestions":["What is the most important quality criterion for this task?","What problems occurred in similar tasks in the past?","Which part should be tackled first?","Is there a possibility of exceeding initial assumptions?"],"warningPatterns":[{"pattern":"Large changes at once","risk":"High complexity, difficult debugging","mitigation":"Split into phases"},{"pattern":"Implementation without tests","risk":"Quality degradation","mitigation":"Follow Red-Green-Refactor"}],"criticalRules":["Complete static checking before proceeding","User approval mandatory before implementation","No commits before quality check completion"],"confidence":"high|medium|low"}
 ```
 
 ## Skill Selection Priority