codehava-agent-kit 1.0.0 → 2.0.0

package/templates/.agent/skills/architecture-decision-records/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,444 @@
+---
+name: architecture-decision-records
+description: "Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions."
+risk: unknown
+source: community
+date_added: "2026-02-27"
+---
+
+# Architecture Decision Records
+
+Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
+
+## Use this skill when
+
+- Making significant architectural decisions
+- Documenting technology choices
+- Recording design trade-offs
+- Onboarding new team members
+- Reviewing historical decisions
+- Establishing decision-making processes
+
+## Do not use this skill when
+
+- You only need to document small implementation details
+- The change is a minor patch or routine maintenance
+- There is no architectural decision to capture
+
+## Instructions
+
+1. Capture the decision context, constraints, and drivers.
+2. Document considered options with tradeoffs.
+3. Record the decision, rationale, and consequences.
+4. Link related ADRs and update status over time.
+
+## Core Concepts
+
+### 1. What is an ADR?
+
+An Architecture Decision Record captures:
+- **Context**: Why we needed to make a decision
+- **Decision**: What we decided
+- **Consequences**: What happens as a result
+
+### 2. When to Write an ADR
+
+| Write ADR | Skip ADR |
+|-----------|----------|
+| New framework adoption | Minor version upgrades |
+| Database technology choice | Bug fixes |
+| API design patterns | Implementation details |
+| Security architecture | Routine maintenance |
+| Integration patterns | Configuration changes |
+
+### 3. ADR Lifecycle
+
+```
+Proposed → Accepted → Deprecated → Superseded
+              ↓
+           Rejected
+```
+
+## Templates
+
+### Template 1: Standard ADR (MADR Format)
+
+```markdown
+# ADR-0001: Use PostgreSQL as Primary Database
+
+## Status
+
+Accepted
+
+## Context
+
+We need to select a primary database for our new e-commerce platform. The system
+will handle:
+- ~10,000 concurrent users
+- Complex product catalog with hierarchical categories
+- Transaction processing for orders and payments
+- Full-text search for products
+- Geospatial queries for store locator
+
+The team has experience with MySQL, PostgreSQL, and MongoDB. We need ACID
+compliance for financial transactions.
+
+## Decision Drivers
+
+* **Must have ACID compliance** for payment processing
+* **Must support complex queries** for reporting
+* **Should support full-text search** to reduce infrastructure complexity
+* **Should have good JSON support** for flexible product attributes
+* **Team familiarity** reduces onboarding time
+
+## Considered Options
+
+### Option 1: PostgreSQL
+- **Pros**: ACID compliant, excellent JSON support (JSONB), built-in full-text
+  search, PostGIS for geospatial, team has experience
+- **Cons**: Slightly more complex replication setup than MySQL
+
+### Option 2: MySQL
+- **Pros**: Very familiar to team, simple replication, large community
+- **Cons**: Weaker JSON support, no built-in full-text search (need
+  Elasticsearch), no geospatial without extensions
+
+### Option 3: MongoDB
+- **Pros**: Flexible schema, native JSON, horizontal scaling
+- **Cons**: No ACID for multi-document transactions (at decision time),
+  team has limited experience, requires schema design discipline
+
+## Decision
+
+We will use **PostgreSQL 15** as our primary database.
+
+## Rationale
+
+PostgreSQL provides the best balance of:
+1. **ACID compliance** essential for e-commerce transactions
+2. **Built-in capabilities** (full-text search, JSONB, PostGIS) reduce
+   infrastructure complexity
+3. **Team familiarity** with SQL databases reduces learning curve
+4. **Mature ecosystem** with excellent tooling and community support
+
+The slight complexity in replication is outweighed by the reduction in
+additional services (no separate Elasticsearch needed).
+
+## Consequences
+
+### Positive
+- Single database handles transactions, search, and geospatial queries
+- Reduced operational complexity (fewer services to manage)
+- Strong consistency guarantees for financial data
+- Team can leverage existing SQL expertise
+
+### Negative
+- Need to learn PostgreSQL-specific features (JSONB, full-text search syntax)
+- Vertical scaling limits may require read replicas sooner
+- Some team members need PostgreSQL-specific training
+
+### Risks
+- Full-text search may not scale as well as dedicated search engines
+- Mitigation: Design for potential Elasticsearch addition if needed
+
+## Implementation Notes
+
+- Use JSONB for flexible product attributes
+- Implement connection pooling with PgBouncer
+- Set up streaming replication for read replicas
+- Use pg_trgm extension for fuzzy search
+
+## Related Decisions
+
+- ADR-0002: Caching Strategy (Redis) - complements database choice
+- ADR-0005: Search Architecture - may supersede if Elasticsearch needed
+
+## References
+
+- [PostgreSQL JSON Documentation](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-json.html)
+- [PostgreSQL Full Text Search](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/textsearch.html)
+- Internal: Performance benchmarks in `/docs/benchmarks/database-comparison.md`
+```
+
+### Template 2: Lightweight ADR
+
+```markdown
+# ADR-0012: Adopt TypeScript for Frontend Development
+
+**Status**: Accepted
+**Date**: 2024-01-15
+**Deciders**: @alice, @bob, @charlie
+
+## Context
+
+Our React codebase has grown to 50+ components with increasing bug reports
+related to prop type mismatches and undefined errors. PropTypes provide
+runtime-only checking.
+
+## Decision
+
+Adopt TypeScript for all new frontend code. Migrate existing code incrementally.
+
+## Consequences
+
+**Good**: Catch type errors at compile time, better IDE support, self-documenting
+code.
+
+**Bad**: Learning curve for team, initial slowdown, build complexity increase.
+
+**Mitigations**: TypeScript training sessions, allow gradual adoption with
+`allowJs: true`.
+```
+
+### Template 3: Y-Statement Format
+
+```markdown
+# ADR-0015: API Gateway Selection
+
+In the context of **building a microservices architecture**,
+facing **the need for centralized API management, authentication, and rate limiting**,
+we decided for **Kong Gateway**
+and against **AWS API Gateway and custom Nginx solution**,
+to achieve **vendor independence, plugin extensibility, and team familiarity with Lua**,
+accepting that **we need to manage Kong infrastructure ourselves**.
+```
+
+### Template 4: ADR for Deprecation
+
+```markdown
+# ADR-0020: Deprecate MongoDB in Favor of PostgreSQL
+
+## Status
+
+Accepted (Supersedes ADR-0003)
+
+## Context
+
+ADR-0003 (2021) chose MongoDB for user profile storage due to schema flexibility
+needs. Since then:
+- MongoDB's multi-document transactions remain problematic for our use case
+- Our schema has stabilized and rarely changes
+- We now have PostgreSQL expertise from other services
+- Maintaining two databases increases operational burden
+
+## Decision
+
+Deprecate MongoDB and migrate user profiles to PostgreSQL.
+
+## Migration Plan
+
+1. **Phase 1** (Week 1-2): Create PostgreSQL schema, dual-write enabled
+2. **Phase 2** (Week 3-4): Backfill historical data, validate consistency
+3. **Phase 3** (Week 5): Switch reads to PostgreSQL, monitor
+4. **Phase 4** (Week 6): Remove MongoDB writes, decommission
+
+## Consequences
+
+### Positive
+- Single database technology reduces operational complexity
+- ACID transactions for user data
+- Team can focus PostgreSQL expertise
+
+### Negative
+- Migration effort (~4 weeks)
+- Risk of data issues during migration
+- Lose some schema flexibility
+
+## Lessons Learned
+
+Document from ADR-0003 experience:
+- Schema flexibility benefits were overestimated
+- Operational cost of multiple databases was underestimated
+- Consider long-term maintenance in technology decisions
+```
+
+### Template 5: Request for Comments (RFC) Style
+
+```markdown
+# RFC-0025: Adopt Event Sourcing for Order Management
+
+## Summary
+
+Propose adopting event sourcing pattern for the order management domain to
+improve auditability, enable temporal queries, and support business analytics.
+
+## Motivation
+
+Current challenges:
+1. Audit requirements need complete order history
+2. "What was the order state at time X?" queries are impossible
+3. Analytics team needs event stream for real-time dashboards
+4. Order state reconstruction for customer support is manual
+
+## Detailed Design
+
+### Event Store
+
+```
+OrderCreated { orderId, customerId, items[], timestamp }
+OrderItemAdded { orderId, item, timestamp }
+OrderItemRemoved { orderId, itemId, timestamp }
+PaymentReceived { orderId, amount, paymentId, timestamp }
+OrderShipped { orderId, trackingNumber, timestamp }
+```
+
+### Projections
+
+- **CurrentOrderState**: Materialized view for queries
+- **OrderHistory**: Complete timeline for audit
+- **DailyOrderMetrics**: Analytics aggregation
+
+### Technology
+
+- Event Store: EventStoreDB (purpose-built, handles projections)
+- Alternative considered: Kafka + custom projection service
+
+## Drawbacks
+
+- Learning curve for team
+- Increased complexity vs. CRUD
+- Need to design events carefully (immutable once stored)
+- Storage growth (events never deleted)
+
+## Alternatives
+
+1. **Audit tables**: Simpler but doesn't enable temporal queries
+2. **CDC from existing DB**: Complex, doesn't change data model
+3. **Hybrid**: Event source only for order state changes
+
+## Unresolved Questions
+
+- [ ] Event schema versioning strategy
+- [ ] Retention policy for events
+- [ ] Snapshot frequency for performance
+
+## Implementation Plan
+
+1. Prototype with single order type (2 weeks)
+2. Team training on event sourcing (1 week)
+3. Full implementation and migration (4 weeks)
+4. Monitoring and optimization (ongoing)
+
+## References
+
+- [Event Sourcing by Martin Fowler](https://martinfowler.com/eaaDev/EventSourcing.html)
+- [EventStoreDB Documentation](https://www.eventstore.com/docs)
+```
+
+## ADR Management
+
+### Directory Structure
+
+```
+docs/
+├── adr/
+│   ├── README.md           # Index and guidelines
+│   ├── template.md         # Team's ADR template
+│   ├── 0001-use-postgresql.md
+│   ├── 0002-caching-strategy.md
+│   ├── 0003-mongodb-user-profiles.md  # [DEPRECATED]
+│   └── 0020-deprecate-mongodb.md      # Supersedes 0003
+```
+
+### ADR Index (README.md)
+
+```markdown
+# Architecture Decision Records
+
+This directory contains Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for [Project Name].
+
+## Index
+
+| ADR | Title | Status | Date |
+|-----|-------|--------|------|
+| 0001 | Use PostgreSQL as Primary Database | Accepted | 2024-01-10 |
+| 0002 | Caching Strategy with Redis | Accepted | 2024-01-12 |
+| 0003 | MongoDB for User Profiles | Deprecated | 2023-06-15 |
+| 0020 | Deprecate MongoDB | Accepted | 2024-01-15 |
+
+## Creating a New ADR
+
+1. Copy `template.md` to `NNNN-title-with-dashes.md`
+2. Fill in the template
+3. Submit PR for review
+4. Update this index after approval
+
+## ADR Status
+
+- **Proposed**: Under discussion
+- **Accepted**: Decision made, implementing
+- **Deprecated**: No longer relevant
+- **Superseded**: Replaced by another ADR
+- **Rejected**: Considered but not adopted
+```
+
+### Automation (adr-tools)
+
+```bash
+# Install adr-tools
+brew install adr-tools
+
+# Initialize ADR directory
+adr init docs/adr
+
+# Create new ADR
+adr new "Use PostgreSQL as Primary Database"
+
+# Supersede an ADR
+adr new -s 3 "Deprecate MongoDB in Favor of PostgreSQL"
+
+# Generate table of contents
+adr generate toc > docs/adr/README.md
+
+# Link related ADRs
+adr link 2 "Complements" 1 "Is complemented by"
+```
+
+## Review Process
+
+```markdown
+## ADR Review Checklist
+
+### Before Submission
+- [ ] Context clearly explains the problem
+- [ ] All viable options considered
+- [ ] Pros/cons balanced and honest
+- [ ] Consequences (positive and negative) documented
+- [ ] Related ADRs linked
+
+### During Review
+- [ ] At least 2 senior engineers reviewed
+- [ ] Affected teams consulted
+- [ ] Security implications considered
+- [ ] Cost implications documented
+- [ ] Reversibility assessed
+
+### After Acceptance
+- [ ] ADR index updated
+- [ ] Team notified
+- [ ] Implementation tickets created
+- [ ] Related documentation updated
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+### Do's
+- **Write ADRs early** - Before implementation starts
+- **Keep them short** - 1-2 pages maximum
+- **Be honest about trade-offs** - Include real cons
+- **Link related decisions** - Build decision graph
+- **Update status** - Deprecate when superseded
+
+### Don'ts
+- **Don't change accepted ADRs** - Write new ones to supersede
+- **Don't skip context** - Future readers need background
+- **Don't hide failures** - Rejected decisions are valuable
+- **Don't be vague** - Specific decisions, specific consequences
+- **Don't forget implementation** - ADR without action is waste
+
+## Resources
+
+- [Documenting Architecture Decisions (Michael Nygard)](https://cognitect.com/blog/2011/11/15/documenting-architecture-decisions)
+- [MADR Template](https://adr.github.io/madr/)
+- [ADR GitHub Organization](https://adr.github.io/)
+- [adr-tools](https://github.com/npryce/adr-tools)

package/templates/.agent/skills/architecture-patterns/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+---
+name: architecture-patterns
+description: "Master proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design to build maintainable, testable, and scalable systems."
+risk: unknown
+source: community
+date_added: "2026-02-27"
+---
+
+# Architecture Patterns
+
+Master proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design to build maintainable, testable, and scalable systems.
+
+## Use this skill when
+
+- Designing new backend systems from scratch
+- Refactoring monolithic applications for better maintainability
+- Establishing architecture standards for your team
+- Migrating from tightly coupled to loosely coupled architectures
+- Implementing domain-driven design principles
+- Creating testable and mockable codebases
+- Planning microservices decomposition
+
+## Do not use this skill when
+
+- You only need small, localized refactors
+- The system is primarily frontend with no backend architecture changes
+- You need implementation details without architectural design
+
+## Instructions
+
+1. Clarify domain boundaries, constraints, and scalability targets.
+2. Select an architecture pattern that fits the domain complexity.
+3. Define module boundaries, interfaces, and dependency rules.
+4. Provide migration steps and validation checks.
+5. For workflows that must survive failures (payments, order fulfillment, multi-step processes), use durable execution at the infrastructure layer — frameworks like DBOS persist workflow state, providing crash recovery without adding architectural complexity.
+
+Refer to `resources/implementation-playbook.md` for detailed patterns, checklists, and templates.
+
+## Related Skills
+
+Works well with: `event-sourcing-architect`, `saga-orchestration`, `workflow-automation`, `dbos-*`
+
+## Resources
+
+- `resources/implementation-playbook.md` for detailed patterns, checklists, and templates.