claudecode-omc 5.5.2 → 5.6.0

package/bundled/upstream/ecc/commands/tdd.md

@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
+---
+description: Legacy slash-entry shim for the tdd-workflow skill. Prefer the skill directly.
+---
+
+# TDD Command (Legacy Shim)
+
+Use this only if you still invoke `/tdd`. The maintained workflow lives in `skills/tdd-workflow/SKILL.md`.
+
+## Canonical Surface
+
+- Prefer the `tdd-workflow` skill directly.
+- Keep this file only as a compatibility entry point.
+
+## Arguments
+
+`$ARGUMENTS`
+
+## Delegation
+
+Apply the `tdd-workflow` skill.
+- Stay strict on RED -> GREEN -> REFACTOR.
+- Keep tests first, coverage explicit, and checkpoint evidence clear.
+- Use the skill as the maintained TDD body instead of duplicating the playbook here.
+})
+```
+
+## Step 3: Run Tests - Verify FAIL
+
+```bash
+npm test lib/liquidity.test.ts
+
+FAIL lib/liquidity.test.ts
+  ✕ should return high score for liquid market (2 ms)
+    Error: Not implemented
+
+1 test failed, 0 passed
+```
+
+PASS: Tests fail as expected. Ready to implement.
+
+## Step 4: Implement Minimal Code (GREEN)
+
+```typescript
+// lib/liquidity.ts
+export function calculateLiquidityScore(market: MarketData): number {
+  // Handle zero volume edge case
+  if (market.totalVolume === 0) {
+    return 0
+  }
+
+  // Calculate component scores (0-100 scale)
+  const volumeScore = Math.min(market.totalVolume / 1000, 100)
+  const spreadScore = Math.max(100 - (market.bidAskSpread * 1000), 0)
+  const traderScore = Math.min(market.activeTraders / 10, 100)
+
+  // Recent activity bonus
+  const hoursSinceLastTrade = (Date.now() - market.lastTradeTime.getTime()) / (1000 * 60 * 60)
+  const recencyScore = Math.max(100 - (hoursSinceLastTrade * 10), 0)
+
+  // Weighted average
+  const score = (
+    volumeScore * 0.4 +
+    spreadScore * 0.3 +
+    traderScore * 0.2 +
+    recencyScore * 0.1
+  )
+
+  return Math.min(Math.max(score, 0), 100) // Clamp to 0-100
+}
+```
+
+## Step 5: Run Tests - Verify PASS
+
+```bash
+npm test lib/liquidity.test.ts
+
+PASS lib/liquidity.test.ts
+  ✓ should return high score for liquid market (3 ms)
+  ✓ should return low score for illiquid market (2 ms)
+  ✓ should handle edge case: zero volume (1 ms)
+
+3 tests passed
+```
+
+PASS: All tests passing!
+
+## Step 6: Refactor (IMPROVE)
+
+```typescript
+// lib/liquidity.ts - Refactored with constants and better readability
+const WEIGHTS = {
+  VOLUME: 0.4,
+  SPREAD: 0.3,
+  TRADERS: 0.2,
+  RECENCY: 0.1,
+} as const
+
+const SCALE_FACTORS = {
+  VOLUME: 1000,
+  SPREAD: 1000,
+  TRADERS: 10,
+  RECENCY_PENALTY: 10,
+} as const
+
+function clamp(value: number, min: number, max: number): number {
+  return Math.min(Math.max(value, min), max)
+}
+
+export function calculateLiquidityScore(market: MarketData): number {
+  if (market.totalVolume === 0) return 0
+
+  const volumeScore = Math.min(market.totalVolume / SCALE_FACTORS.VOLUME, 100)
+  const spreadScore = clamp(100 - (market.bidAskSpread * SCALE_FACTORS.SPREAD), 0, 100)
+  const traderScore = Math.min(market.activeTraders / SCALE_FACTORS.TRADERS, 100)
+
+  const hoursSinceLastTrade = (Date.now() - market.lastTradeTime.getTime()) / (1000 * 60 * 60)
+  const recencyScore = clamp(100 - (hoursSinceLastTrade * SCALE_FACTORS.RECENCY_PENALTY), 0, 100)
+
+  const weightedScore =
+    volumeScore * WEIGHTS.VOLUME +
+    spreadScore * WEIGHTS.SPREAD +
+    traderScore * WEIGHTS.TRADERS +
+    recencyScore * WEIGHTS.RECENCY
+
+  return clamp(weightedScore, 0, 100)
+}
+```
+
+## Step 7: Verify Tests Still Pass
+
+```bash
+npm test lib/liquidity.test.ts
+
+PASS lib/liquidity.test.ts
+  ✓ should return high score for liquid market (3 ms)
+  ✓ should return low score for illiquid market (2 ms)
+  ✓ should handle edge case: zero volume (1 ms)
+
+3 tests passed
+```
+
+PASS: Refactoring complete, tests still passing!
+
+## Step 8: Check Coverage
+
+```bash
+npm test -- --coverage lib/liquidity.test.ts
+
+File           | % Stmts | % Branch | % Funcs | % Lines
+---------------|---------|----------|---------|--------
+liquidity.ts   |   100   |   100    |   100   |   100
+
+Coverage: 100% PASS: (Target: 80%)
+```
+
+PASS: TDD session complete!
+```
+
+## TDD Best Practices
+
+**DO:**
+- PASS: Write the test FIRST, before any implementation
+- PASS: Run tests and verify they FAIL before implementing
+- PASS: Write minimal code to make tests pass
+- PASS: Refactor only after tests are green
+- PASS: Add edge cases and error scenarios
+- PASS: Aim for 80%+ coverage (100% for critical code)
+
+**DON'T:**
+- FAIL: Write implementation before tests
+- FAIL: Skip running tests after each change
+- FAIL: Write too much code at once
+- FAIL: Ignore failing tests
+- FAIL: Test implementation details (test behavior)
+- FAIL: Mock everything (prefer integration tests)
+
+## Test Types to Include
+
+**Unit Tests** (Function-level):
+- Happy path scenarios
+- Edge cases (empty, null, max values)
+- Error conditions
+- Boundary values
+
+**Integration Tests** (Component-level):
+- API endpoints
+- Database operations
+- External service calls
+- React components with hooks
+
+**E2E Tests** (use `/e2e` command):
+- Critical user flows
+- Multi-step processes
+- Full stack integration
+
+## Coverage Requirements
+
+- **80% minimum** for all code
+- **100% required** for:
+  - Financial calculations
+  - Authentication logic
+  - Security-critical code
+  - Core business logic
+
+## Important Notes
+
+**MANDATORY**: Tests must be written BEFORE implementation. The TDD cycle is:
+
+1. **RED** - Write failing test
+2. **GREEN** - Implement to pass
+3. **REFACTOR** - Improve code
+
+Never skip the RED phase. Never write code before tests.
+
+## Integration with Other Commands
+
+- Use `/plan` first to understand what to build
+- Use `/tdd` to implement with tests
+- Use `/build-fix` if build errors occur
+- Use `/code-review` to review implementation
+- Use `/test-coverage` to verify coverage
+
+## Related Agents
+
+This command invokes the `tdd-guide` agent provided by ECC.
+
+The related `tdd-workflow` skill is also bundled with ECC.
+
+For manual installs, the source files live at:
+- `agents/tdd-guide.md`
+- `skills/tdd-workflow/SKILL.md`

package/bundled/upstream/ecc/commands/test-coverage.md

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+# Test Coverage
+
+Analyze test coverage, identify gaps, and generate missing tests to reach 80%+ coverage.
+
+## Step 1: Detect Test Framework
+
+| Indicator | Coverage Command |
+|-----------|-----------------|
+| `jest.config.*` or `package.json` jest | `npx jest --coverage --coverageReporters=json-summary` |
+| `vitest.config.*` | `npx vitest run --coverage` |
+| `pytest.ini` / `pyproject.toml` pytest | `pytest --cov=src --cov-report=json` |
+| `Cargo.toml` | `cargo llvm-cov --json` |
+| `pom.xml` with JaCoCo | `mvn test jacoco:report` |
+| `go.mod` | `go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...` |
+
+## Step 2: Analyze Coverage Report
+
+1. Run the coverage command
+2. Parse the output (JSON summary or terminal output)
+3. List files **below 80% coverage**, sorted worst-first
+4. For each under-covered file, identify:
+   - Untested functions or methods
+   - Missing branch coverage (if/else, switch, error paths)
+   - Dead code that inflates the denominator
+
+## Step 3: Generate Missing Tests
+
+For each under-covered file, generate tests following this priority:
+
+1. **Happy path** — Core functionality with valid inputs
+2. **Error handling** — Invalid inputs, missing data, network failures
+3. **Edge cases** — Empty arrays, null/undefined, boundary values (0, -1, MAX_INT)
+4. **Branch coverage** — Each if/else, switch case, ternary
+
+### Test Generation Rules
+
+- Place tests adjacent to source: `foo.ts` → `foo.test.ts` (or project convention)
+- Use existing test patterns from the project (import style, assertion library, mocking approach)
+- Mock external dependencies (database, APIs, file system)
+- Each test should be independent — no shared mutable state between tests
+- Name tests descriptively: `test_create_user_with_duplicate_email_returns_409`
+
+## Step 4: Verify
+
+1. Run the full test suite — all tests must pass
+2. Re-run coverage — verify improvement
+3. If still below 80%, repeat Step 3 for remaining gaps
+
+## Step 5: Report
+
+Show before/after comparison:
+
+```
+Coverage Report
+──────────────────────────────
+File                   Before  After
+src/services/auth.ts   45%     88%
+src/utils/validation.ts 32%    82%
+──────────────────────────────
+Overall:               67%     84%  PASS:
+```
+
+## Focus Areas
+
+- Functions with complex branching (high cyclomatic complexity)
+- Error handlers and catch blocks
+- Utility functions used across the codebase
+- API endpoint handlers (request → response flow)
+- Edge cases: null, undefined, empty string, empty array, zero, negative numbers

package/bundled/upstream/ecc/commands/update-codemaps.md

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+# Update Codemaps
+
+Analyze the codebase structure and generate token-lean architecture documentation.
+
+## Step 1: Scan Project Structure
+
+1. Identify the project type (monorepo, single app, library, microservice)
+2. Find all source directories (src/, lib/, app/, packages/)
+3. Map entry points (main.ts, index.ts, app.py, main.go, etc.)
+
+## Step 2: Generate Codemaps
+
+Create or update codemaps in `docs/CODEMAPS/` (or `.reports/codemaps/`):
+
+| File | Contents |
+|------|----------|
+| `architecture.md` | High-level system diagram, service boundaries, data flow |
+| `backend.md` | API routes, middleware chain, service → repository mapping |
+| `frontend.md` | Page tree, component hierarchy, state management flow |
+| `data.md` | Database tables, relationships, migration history |
+| `dependencies.md` | External services, third-party integrations, shared libraries |
+
+### Codemap Format
+
+Each codemap should be token-lean — optimized for AI context consumption:
+
+```markdown
+# Backend Architecture
+
+## Routes
+POST /api/users → UserController.create → UserService.create → UserRepo.insert
+GET  /api/users/:id → UserController.get → UserService.findById → UserRepo.findById
+
+## Key Files
+src/services/user.ts (business logic, 120 lines)
+src/repos/user.ts (database access, 80 lines)
+
+## Dependencies
+- PostgreSQL (primary data store)
+- Redis (session cache, rate limiting)
+- Stripe (payment processing)
+```
+
+## Step 3: Diff Detection
+
+1. If previous codemaps exist, calculate the diff percentage
+2. If changes > 30%, show the diff and request user approval before overwriting
+3. If changes <= 30%, update in place
+
+## Step 4: Add Metadata
+
+Add a freshness header to each codemap:
+
+```markdown
+<!-- Generated: 2026-02-11 | Files scanned: 142 | Token estimate: ~800 -->
+```
+
+## Step 5: Save Analysis Report
+
+Write a summary to `.reports/codemap-diff.txt`:
+- Files added/removed/modified since last scan
+- New dependencies detected
+- Architecture changes (new routes, new services, etc.)
+- Staleness warnings for docs not updated in 90+ days
+
+## Tips
+
+- Focus on **high-level structure**, not implementation details
+- Prefer **file paths and function signatures** over full code blocks
+- Keep each codemap under **1000 tokens** for efficient context loading
+- Use ASCII diagrams for data flow instead of verbose descriptions
+- Run after major feature additions or refactoring sessions

package/bundled/upstream/ecc/commands/update-docs.md

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+# Update Documentation
+
+Sync documentation with the codebase, generating from source-of-truth files.
+
+## Step 1: Identify Sources of Truth
+
+| Source | Generates |
+|--------|-----------|
+| `package.json` scripts | Available commands reference |
+| `.env.example` | Environment variable documentation |
+| `openapi.yaml` / route files | API endpoint reference |
+| Source code exports | Public API documentation |
+| `Dockerfile` / `docker-compose.yml` | Infrastructure setup docs |
+
+## Step 2: Generate Script Reference
+
+1. Read `package.json` (or `Makefile`, `Cargo.toml`, `pyproject.toml`)
+2. Extract all scripts/commands with their descriptions
+3. Generate a reference table:
+
+```markdown
+| Command | Description |
+|---------|-------------|
+| `npm run dev` | Start development server with hot reload |
+| `npm run build` | Production build with type checking |
+| `npm test` | Run test suite with coverage |
+```
+
+## Step 3: Generate Environment Documentation
+
+1. Read `.env.example` (or `.env.template`, `.env.sample`)
+2. Extract all variables with their purposes
+3. Categorize as required vs optional
+4. Document expected format and valid values
+
+```markdown
+| Variable | Required | Description | Example |
+|----------|----------|-------------|---------|
+| `DATABASE_URL` | Yes | PostgreSQL connection string | `postgres://user:pass@host:5432/db` |
+| `LOG_LEVEL` | No | Logging verbosity (default: info) | `debug`, `info`, `warn`, `error` |
+```
+
+## Step 4: Update Contributing Guide
+
+Generate or update `docs/CONTRIBUTING.md` with:
+- Development environment setup (prerequisites, install steps)
+- Available scripts and their purposes
+- Testing procedures (how to run, how to write new tests)
+- Code style enforcement (linter, formatter, pre-commit hooks)
+- PR submission checklist
+
+## Step 5: Update Runbook
+
+Generate or update `docs/RUNBOOK.md` with:
+- Deployment procedures (step-by-step)
+- Health check endpoints and monitoring
+- Common issues and their fixes
+- Rollback procedures
+- Alerting and escalation paths
+
+## Step 6: Staleness Check
+
+1. Find documentation files not modified in 90+ days
+2. Cross-reference with recent source code changes
+3. Flag potentially outdated docs for manual review
+
+## Step 7: Show Summary
+
+```
+Documentation Update
+──────────────────────────────
+Updated:  docs/CONTRIBUTING.md (scripts table)
+Updated:  docs/ENV.md (3 new variables)
+Flagged:  docs/DEPLOY.md (142 days stale)
+Skipped:  docs/API.md (no changes detected)
+──────────────────────────────
+```
+
+## Rules
+
+- **Single source of truth**: Always generate from code, never manually edit generated sections
+- **Preserve manual sections**: Only update generated sections; leave hand-written prose intact
+- **Mark generated content**: Use `<!-- AUTO-GENERATED -->` markers around generated sections
+- **Don't create docs unprompted**: Only create new doc files if the command explicitly requests it

package/bundled/upstream/ecc/commands/verify.md

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+---
+description: Legacy slash-entry shim for the verification-loop skill. Prefer the skill directly.
+---
+
+# Verification Command (Legacy Shim)
+
+Use this only if you still invoke `/verify`. The maintained workflow lives in `skills/verification-loop/SKILL.md`.
+
+## Canonical Surface
+
+- Prefer the `verification-loop` skill directly.
+- Keep this file only as a compatibility entry point.
+
+## Arguments
+
+`$ARGUMENTS`
+
+## Delegation
+
+Apply the `verification-loop` skill.
+- Choose the right verification depth for the user's requested mode.
+- Run build, types, lint, tests, security/log checks, and diff review in the right order for the current repo.
+- Report only the verdicts and blockers instead of maintaining a second verification checklist here.