claude-flow 2.5.0-alpha.141 → 2.7.0-alpha.1

package/docs/reference/SWARM.md

@@ -0,0 +1,2000 @@
+# Claude Flow Swarm Intelligence Documentation
+
+## Table of Contents
+
+- [Overview](#overview)
+- [Core Concepts](#core-concepts)
+- [Topology Types](#topology-types)
+- [Consensus Mechanisms](#consensus-mechanisms)
+- [Byzantine Fault Tolerance](#byzantine-fault-tolerance)
+- [Distributed Memory Management](#distributed-memory-management)
+- [Performance Metrics](#performance-metrics)
+- [Command Reference](#command-reference)
+- [Configuration Examples](#configuration-examples)
+- [Real-World Use Cases](#real-world-use-cases)
+- [Best Practices](#best-practices)
+- [Troubleshooting](#troubleshooting)
+
+## Overview
+
+The Claude Flow Swarm Intelligence System enables self-orchestrating networks of specialized AI agents that collaborate to solve complex tasks. This system implements distributed coordination patterns, consensus mechanisms, and fault-tolerant architectures to create robust, scalable AI agent networks.
+
+### Key Features
+
+- **Multi-topology Support**: Centralized, distributed, mesh, hierarchical, and hybrid configurations
+- **Byzantine Fault Tolerance**: Resilient to agent failures and malicious behavior
+- **Consensus Mechanisms**: Democratic decision-making and collective intelligence
+- **Distributed Memory**: Shared knowledge and coordination state
+- **Performance Monitoring**: Real-time metrics and optimization
+- **Dynamic Scaling**: Automatic agent spawning and load balancing
+
+## Core Concepts
+
+### Swarm Architecture
+
+A swarm consists of:
+
+1. **Master Orchestrator**: Coordinates the overall swarm operation
+2. **Specialized Agents**: Individual AI instances with specific capabilities
+3. **Communication Layer**: Message bus for inter-agent communication
+4. **Shared Memory**: Distributed knowledge and state management
+5. **Consensus Engine**: Democratic decision-making system
+6. **Resource Manager**: Compute and memory allocation
+
+### Agent Types
+
+```typescript
+export type AgentType =
+  | 'coordinator'      // Orchestrates and manages other agents
+  | 'researcher'       // Performs research and data gathering
+  | 'coder'           // Writes and maintains code
+  | 'analyst'         // Analyzes data and generates insights
+  | 'architect'       // Designs system architecture
+  | 'tester'          // Tests and validates functionality
+  | 'reviewer'        // Reviews and validates work
+  | 'optimizer'       // Optimizes performance
+  | 'documenter'      // Creates documentation
+  | 'monitor'         // Monitors system health
+  | 'specialist'      // Domain-specific expertise
+```
+
+### Agent Capabilities
+
+Each agent has defined capabilities that determine task assignment:
+
+```typescript
+interface AgentCapabilities {
+  // Core capabilities
+  codeGeneration: boolean;
+  codeReview: boolean;
+  testing: boolean;
+  documentation: boolean;
+  research: boolean;
+  analysis: boolean;
+  
+  // Communication
+  webSearch: boolean;
+  apiIntegration: boolean;
+  fileSystem: boolean;
+  terminalAccess: boolean;
+  
+  // Specialization
+  languages: string[];     // Programming languages
+  frameworks: string[];    // Frameworks and libraries
+  domains: string[];       // Domain expertise
+  tools: string[];         // Available tools
+  
+  // Performance limits
+  maxConcurrentTasks: number;
+  reliability: number;     // 0-1 reliability score
+  speed: number;           // Relative speed rating
+  quality: number;         // Quality rating
+}
+```
+
+## Topology Types
+
+### 1. Centralized Topology
+
+**Structure**: Single coordinator manages all agents
+**Best For**: Simple tasks, clear hierarchies, strong coordination needs
+
+```typescript
+interface CentralizedConfig {
+  topology: 'centralized';
+  coordinator: {
+    type: 'master-coordinator';
+    capabilities: ['task_management', 'resource_allocation'];
+  };
+  agents: AgentConfig[];
+  communication: 'hub-and-spoke';
+}
+```
+
+**Advantages**:
+- Simple coordination
+- Clear authority structure
+- Easy debugging and monitoring
+- Consistent decision-making
+
+**Disadvantages**:
+- Single point of failure
+- Bottleneck at coordinator
+- Limited scalability
+- Reduced fault tolerance
+
+### 2. Distributed Topology
+
+**Structure**: Multiple coordinators share management responsibilities
+**Best For**: Large-scale operations, fault tolerance, geographical distribution
+
+```typescript
+interface DistributedConfig {
+  topology: 'distributed';
+  coordinators: CoordinatorConfig[];
+  loadBalancing: 'round-robin' | 'capability-based' | 'workload-balanced';
+  consensusRequired: boolean;
+  partitioning: 'task-based' | 'agent-based' | 'geographic';
+}
+```
+
+**Advantages**:
+- High fault tolerance
+- Excellent scalability
+- Load distribution
+- Geographic resilience
+
+**Disadvantages**:
+- Complex coordination
+- Consistency challenges
+- Network overhead
+- Harder debugging
+
+### 3. Mesh Topology
+
+**Structure**: Peer-to-peer agent network with direct communication
+**Best For**: Collaborative tasks, consensus-driven decisions, research projects
+
+```typescript
+interface MeshConfig {
+  topology: 'mesh';
+  connectionStrategy: 'full-mesh' | 'partial-mesh' | 'ring-mesh';
+  consensusAlgorithm: 'raft' | 'pbft' | 'pos';
+  communicationProtocol: 'gossip' | 'broadcast' | 'multicast';
+  redundancyLevel: number; // 1-5
+}
+```
+
+**Advantages**:
+- Democratic decision-making
+- High redundancy
+- Self-organizing
+- Resilient to failures
+
+**Disadvantages**:
+- High communication overhead
+- Complexity in large networks
+- Consensus can be slow
+- Resource intensive
+
+### 4. Hierarchical Topology
+
+**Structure**: Tree-like structure with multiple coordination levels
+**Best For**: Complex projects, clear task breakdown, enterprise scenarios
+
+```typescript
+interface HierarchicalConfig {
+  topology: 'hierarchical';
+  levels: {
+    executives: CoordinatorConfig[];    // Top-level strategy
+    managers: CoordinatorConfig[];      // Mid-level coordination
+    workers: AgentConfig[];             // Task execution
+  };
+  spanOfControl: number;                // Max direct reports
+  escalationRules: EscalationRule[];
+}
+```
+
+**Advantages**:
+- Clear responsibility chains
+- Efficient for complex tasks
+- Good scalability
+- Natural task delegation
+
+**Disadvantages**:
+- Rigid structure
+- Potential bottlenecks at levels
+- Slower adaptation
+- Communication delays
+
+### 5. Hybrid Topology
+
+**Structure**: Combines multiple topologies for optimal performance
+**Best For**: Complex, multi-phase projects with varying requirements
+
+```typescript
+interface HybridConfig {
+  topology: 'hybrid';
+  phases: {
+    planning: 'centralized';     // Centralized planning
+    execution: 'distributed';    // Distributed execution
+    integration: 'hierarchical'; // Hierarchical integration
+    review: 'mesh';              // Mesh-based peer review
+  };
+  dynamicReconfiguration: boolean;
+  adaptationTriggers: string[];
+}
+```
+
+**Advantages**:
+- Optimal for each phase
+- Maximum flexibility
+- Best performance characteristics
+- Adaptive to changing needs
+
+**Disadvantages**:
+- Most complex to implement
+- Requires sophisticated coordination
+- Higher resource requirements
+- Harder to predict behavior
+
+## Consensus Mechanisms
+
+### 1. Voting Systems
+
+#### Simple Majority Voting
+```typescript
+interface MajorityVoting {
+  type: 'majority';
+  threshold: 0.5;           // 50% + 1
+  eligibleVoters: AgentId[];
+  votingPeriod: number;     // milliseconds
+  tieBreaking: 'random' | 'coordinator' | 'expertise-weighted';
+}
+```
+
+#### Weighted Voting
+```typescript
+interface WeightedVoting {
+  type: 'weighted';
+  weights: Map<AgentId, number>;  // Agent expertise weights
+  threshold: number;               // Weighted threshold
+  weightingFactors: {
+    expertise: number;
+    reliability: number;
+    performance: number;
+  };
+}
+```
+
+#### Supermajority Voting
+```typescript
+interface SupermajorityVoting {
+  type: 'supermajority';
+  threshold: 0.67;          // 2/3 majority
+  criticalDecisions: boolean;
+  fallbackToMajority: boolean;
+}
+```
+
+### 2. Consensus Algorithms
+
+#### Raft Consensus
+```typescript
+interface RaftConfig {
+  algorithm: 'raft';
+  electionTimeout: number;
+  heartbeatInterval: number;
+  logReplication: boolean;
+  leaderElection: {
+    enabled: boolean;
+    termDuration: number;
+    candidateTimeout: number;
+  };
+}
+```
+
+Usage:
+```bash
+claude-flow swarm "Complex decision task" \
+  --topology mesh \
+  --consensus raft \
+  --election-timeout 5000
+```
+
+#### Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT)
+```typescript
+interface PBFTConfig {
+  algorithm: 'pbft';
+  byzantineTolerance: number;  // f = (n-1)/3 Byzantine nodes
+  viewChangeTimeout: number;
+  prepareThreshold: number;
+  commitThreshold: number;
+  checkpointInterval: number;
+}
+```
+
+#### Proof of Stake (PoS)
+```typescript
+interface PoSConfig {
+  algorithm: 'pos';
+  stakingMechanism: 'performance' | 'reliability' | 'expertise';
+  minimumStake: number;
+  slashingConditions: string[];
+  rewardDistribution: 'proportional' | 'equal';
+}
+```
+
+### 3. Consensus Process Flow
+
+```mermaid
+graph TD
+    A[Proposal Initiated] --> B[Collect Agent Opinions]
+    B --> C[Voting Phase]
+    C --> D{Consensus Reached?}
+    D -->|Yes| E[Execute Decision]
+    D -->|No| F[Conflict Resolution]
+    F --> G{Retry?}
+    G -->|Yes| B
+    G -->|No| H[Escalate to Coordinator]
+    E --> I[Record in Shared Memory]
+    H --> J[Manual Resolution]
+```
+
+## Byzantine Fault Tolerance
+
+### Understanding Byzantine Failures
+
+Byzantine failures occur when agents:
+- Provide incorrect or malicious responses
+- Act unpredictably or inconsistently
+- Attempt to undermine swarm objectives
+- Experience partial failures that corrupt their state
+
+### Byzantine Fault Tolerance Mechanisms
+
+#### 1. Agent Authentication and Trust
+
+```typescript
+interface TrustManagement {
+  authentication: {
+    method: 'signature' | 'certificate' | 'token';
+    rotationInterval: number;
+    revocationList: AgentId[];
+  };
+  trustScores: Map<AgentId, TrustScore>;
+  suspiciousActivityDetection: boolean;
+  quarantinePolicy: {
+    threshold: number;
+    duration: number;
+    reviewProcess: boolean;
+  };
+}
+
+interface TrustScore {
+  reliability: number;      // 0-1 based on past performance
+  consistency: number;      // 0-1 behavioral consistency
+  expertise: number;        // 0-1 domain expertise
+  timeDecay: number;        // Trust degradation over time
+}
+```
+
+#### 2. Response Validation
+
+```typescript
+interface ResponseValidation {
+  crossValidation: {
+    enabled: boolean;
+    minimumValidators: number;
+    agreementThreshold: number;
+  };
+  
+  outputVerification: {
+    codeExecution: boolean;
+    logicValidation: boolean;
+    formatChecking: boolean;
+  };
+  
+  consistencyChecks: {
+    previousResponses: boolean;
+    expertiseAlignment: boolean;
+    timeConstraints: boolean;
+  };
+}
+```
+
+#### 3. Redundancy and Backup Systems
+
+```typescript
+interface RedundancyConfig {
+  taskReplication: {
+    factor: number;           // How many agents work on same task
+    diversityRequirement: boolean; // Require different agent types
+    independentExecution: boolean;
+  };
+  
+  resultAggregation: {
+    method: 'voting' | 'averaging' | 'best-of-n';
+    outlierDetection: boolean;
+    qualityWeighting: boolean;
+  };
+  
+  fallbackMechanisms: {
+    degradedMode: boolean;    // Continue with reduced functionality
+    humanIntervention: boolean;
+    alternativeApproaches: string[];
+  };
+}
+```
+
+#### 4. Monitoring and Detection
+
+```typescript
+interface ByzantineDetection {
+  anomalyDetection: {
+    responseTime: { min: number; max: number };
+    qualityMetrics: { threshold: number };
+    behaviorPatterns: string[];
+  };
+  
+  votingPatternAnalysis: {
+    enabled: boolean;
+    suspiciousPatterns: string[];
+    collisionDetection: boolean;
+  };
+  
+  alerting: {
+    realTime: boolean;
+    thresholds: Map<string, number>;
+    escalationProcedure: string[];
+  };
+}
+```
+
+### Implementation Example
+
+```bash
+# Start a Byzantine fault-tolerant swarm
+claude-flow swarm "Critical system analysis" \
+  --topology mesh \
+  --byzantine-tolerance 3 \
+  --consensus pbft \
+  --trust-management enabled \
+  --redundancy-factor 5 \
+  --cross-validation 3
+```
+
+Configuration:
+```json
+{
+  "swarmConfig": {
+    "topology": "mesh",
+    "byzantineTolerance": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "maxByzantineNodes": 3,
+      "detectionThreshold": 0.7,
+      "quarantineEnabled": true
+    },
+    "consensus": {
+      "algorithm": "pbft",
+      "threshold": 0.67,
+      "validationRounds": 2
+    },
+    "redundancy": {
+      "taskReplication": 5,
+      "resultAggregation": "weighted-voting",
+      "fallbackEnabled": true
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Distributed Memory Management
+
+### Architecture Overview
+
+The distributed memory system provides shared knowledge and coordination state across all swarm agents.
+
+```typescript
+interface DistributedMemoryConfig {
+  backend: 'sqlite' | 'mongodb' | 'redis' | 'hybrid';
+  replication: {
+    enabled: boolean;
+    factor: number;           // Number of replicas
+    strategy: 'master-slave' | 'multi-master' | 'raft';
+    consistencyLevel: 'eventual' | 'strong' | 'bounded';
+  };
+  
+  partitioning: {
+    enabled: boolean;
+    strategy: 'key-hash' | 'range' | 'directory';
+    shardCount: number;
+  };
+  
+  caching: {
+    enabled: boolean;
+    levels: ('l1' | 'l2' | 'l3')[];
+    evictionPolicy: 'lru' | 'lfu' | 'ttl';
+    sizeLimitMB: number;
+  };
+}
+```
+
+### Memory Types
+
+#### 1. Shared Knowledge Base
+
+Stores collective intelligence and learned patterns:
+
+```typescript
+interface KnowledgeEntry {
+  id: string;
+  type: 'fact' | 'pattern' | 'solution' | 'heuristic';
+  domain: string;
+  content: any;
+  confidence: number;       // 0-1 confidence score
+  sources: AgentId[];       // Contributing agents
+  validations: number;      // Number of validations
+  timestamp: Date;
+  expirationDate?: Date;
+  tags: string[];
+}
+```
+
+#### 2. Task Coordination State
+
+Manages distributed task execution:
+
+```typescript
+interface TaskState {
+  taskId: string;
+  status: 'pending' | 'assigned' | 'in-progress' | 'completed' | 'failed';
+  assignedAgents: AgentId[];
+  dependencies: string[];
+  progress: number;         // 0-100 completion percentage
+  checkpoints: Checkpoint[];
+  results: TaskResult[];
+  locks: ResourceLock[];
+}
+```
+
+#### 3. Agent Communication History
+
+Maintains message logs and interaction patterns:
+
+```typescript
+interface CommunicationLog {
+  messageId: string;
+  sender: AgentId;
+  recipients: AgentId[];
+  type: 'request' | 'response' | 'broadcast' | 'notification';
+  content: any;
+  timestamp: Date;
+  acknowledged: AgentId[];
+  priority: 'low' | 'normal' | 'high' | 'critical';
+}
+```
+
+### Synchronization Strategies
+
+#### 1. Eventually Consistent (AP from CAP Theorem)
+
+```typescript
+interface EventualConsistency {
+  strategy: 'eventual';
+  propagationDelay: number;     // Max delay for updates
+  conflictResolution: 'last-write-wins' | 'vector-clocks' | 'operational-transform';
+  antiEntropyInterval: number;  // Background sync frequency
+}
+```
+
+#### 2. Strong Consistency (CP from CAP Theorem)
+
+```typescript
+interface StrongConsistency {
+  strategy: 'strong';
+  consensusRequired: boolean;
+  quorumSize: number;          // Minimum nodes for operations
+  timeoutMs: number;           // Operation timeout
+  rollbackOnFailure: boolean;
+}
+```
+
+#### 3. Bounded Staleness
+
+```typescript
+interface BoundedStaleness {
+  strategy: 'bounded';
+  maxStalenessMs: number;      // Maximum staleness allowed
+  consistencyCheckInterval: number;
+  repairMechanism: 'read-repair' | 'write-repair' | 'periodic';
+}
+```
+
+### Memory Operations
+
+#### Basic Operations
+
+```typescript
+// Store data
+await memory.store({
+  key: 'task:analysis:results',
+  value: analysisResults,
+  namespace: 'swarm-123',
+  ttl: 3600000,  // 1 hour
+  replicate: true
+});
+
+// Retrieve data
+const results = await memory.retrieve({
+  key: 'task:analysis:results',
+  namespace: 'swarm-123',
+  consistency: 'strong'
+});
+
+// Update with conflict resolution
+await memory.update({
+  key: 'agent:coordinator:state',
+  updateFn: (currentValue) => ({
+    ...currentValue,
+    lastActivity: new Date(),
+    taskCount: currentValue.taskCount + 1
+  }),
+  conflictResolution: 'merge'
+});
+```
+
+#### Advanced Operations
+
+```typescript
+// Distributed lock
+const lock = await memory.acquireLock({
+  resource: 'task:critical-section',
+  timeout: 30000,
+  owner: agentId
+});
+
+try {
+  // Critical section operations
+  await performCriticalWork();
+} finally {
+  await memory.releaseLock(lock);
+}
+
+// Publish-subscribe messaging
+await memory.subscribe({
+  channel: 'task:updates',
+  handler: (message) => {
+    console.log('Task update received:', message);
+  }
+});
+
+await memory.publish({
+  channel: 'task:updates',
+  message: { type: 'completed', taskId: 'task-123' }
+});
+```
+
+### Configuration Examples
+
+#### High-Performance Configuration
+
+```json
+{
+  "distributedMemory": {
+    "backend": "redis",
+    "replication": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "factor": 3,
+      "strategy": "multi-master",
+      "consistencyLevel": "eventual"
+    },
+    "caching": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "levels": ["l1", "l2"],
+      "sizeLimitMB": 512
+    },
+    "partitioning": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "strategy": "key-hash",
+      "shardCount": 16
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+#### High-Consistency Configuration
+
+```json
+{
+  "distributedMemory": {
+    "backend": "mongodb",
+    "replication": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "factor": 5,
+      "strategy": "raft",
+      "consistencyLevel": "strong"
+    },
+    "operations": {
+      "quorumSize": 3,
+      "timeoutMs": 5000,
+      "rollbackOnFailure": true
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Performance Metrics
+
+### System-Level Metrics
+
+#### 1. Throughput Metrics
+
+```typescript
+interface ThroughputMetrics {
+  tasksPerSecond: number;
+  tasksPerHour: number;
+  peakThroughput: number;
+  averageThroughput: number;
+  
+  // Breakdown by task type
+  throughputByType: Map<string, number>;
+  
+  // Time series data
+  throughputHistory: TimeSeriesPoint[];
+}
+```
+
+#### 2. Latency Metrics
+
+```typescript
+interface LatencyMetrics {
+  averageLatency: number;
+  p50Latency: number;       // 50th percentile
+  p95Latency: number;       // 95th percentile
+  p99Latency: number;       // 99th percentile
+  maxLatency: number;
+  
+  // Component breakdown
+  coordinationLatency: number;
+  executionLatency: number;
+  communicationLatency: number;
+  memoryLatency: number;
+}
+```
+
+#### 3. Resource Utilization
+
+```typescript
+interface ResourceMetrics {
+  cpu: {
+    usage: number;          // 0-100 percentage
+    cores: number;
+    frequency: number;
+  };
+  
+  memory: {
+    used: number;           // Bytes
+    available: number;
+    percentage: number;
+    swapUsed: number;
+  };
+  
+  network: {
+    bytesIn: number;
+    bytesOut: number;
+    packetsIn: number;
+    packetsOut: number;
+    bandwidth: number;
+  };
+  
+  storage: {
+    readIops: number;
+    writeIops: number;
+    readThroughput: number;
+    writeThroughput: number;
+    diskUsage: number;
+  };
+}
+```
+
+### Agent-Level Metrics
+
+#### 1. Performance Metrics
+
+```typescript
+interface AgentPerformanceMetrics {
+  agentId: AgentId;
+  
+  // Task execution
+  tasksCompleted: number;
+  tasksFailed: number;
+  successRate: number;
+  averageExecutionTime: number;
+  
+  // Quality metrics
+  codeQuality: number;      // 0-1 score
+  testCoverage: number;     // 0-100 percentage
+  bugRate: number;          // Bugs per 1000 LOC
+  reviewScore: number;      // Peer review score
+  
+  // Efficiency metrics
+  resourceEfficiency: number; // Tasks per resource unit
+  timeEfficiency: number;     // Actual vs estimated time
+  costEfficiency: number;     // Value delivered per cost
+}
+```
+
+#### 2. Reliability Metrics
+
+```typescript
+interface AgentReliabilityMetrics {
+  uptime: number;           // Percentage
+  mttr: number;             // Mean time to recovery (ms)
+  mtbf: number;             // Mean time between failures (ms)
+  
+  errorRate: number;        // Errors per hour
+  timeoutRate: number;      // Timeout percentage
+  crashCount: number;       // Number of crashes
+  
+  healthScore: number;      // 0-1 overall health
+  lastHealthCheck: Date;
+  healthTrend: 'improving' | 'stable' | 'degrading';
+}
+```
+
+### Swarm-Level Metrics
+
+#### 1. Coordination Effectiveness
+
+```typescript
+interface CoordinationMetrics {
+  consensusSuccessRate: number;
+  consensusTime: number;            // Average time to reach consensus
+  communicationEfficiency: number;  // Useful messages / total messages
+  
+  taskDistribution: {
+    loadBalance: number;            // 0-1 how evenly distributed
+    utilizationRate: number;        // Active agents / total agents
+    queueLength: number;            // Pending tasks
+  };
+  
+  conflictResolution: {
+    conflictRate: number;           // Conflicts per hour
+    resolutionTime: number;         // Average resolution time
+    escalationRate: number;         // Escalated conflicts percentage
+  };
+}
+```
+
+#### 2. Emergent Intelligence
+
+```typescript
+interface IntelligenceMetrics {
+  knowledgeGrowthRate: number;      // New knowledge per day
+  patternRecognitionSuccess: number; // Successful pattern matches
+  adaptabilityScore: number;        // Response to changing conditions
+  
+  collectiveProblemSolving: {
+    solutionQuality: number;        // 0-1 quality score
+    innovationRate: number;         // Novel solutions per problem
+    learningVelocity: number;       // Knowledge acquisition rate
+  };
+  
+  emergentBehaviors: {
+    selfOrganizationLevel: number;  // 0-1 self-organization score
+    synergisticEffects: number;     // Performance beyond sum of parts
+    adaptiveCapacity: number;       // Ability to adapt to new tasks
+  };
+}
+```
+
+### Monitoring and Alerting
+
+#### Real-Time Dashboards
+
+```typescript
+interface DashboardConfig {
+  refreshInterval: number;          // milliseconds
+  
+  panels: {
+    systemOverview: boolean;
+    agentStatus: boolean;
+    taskProgress: boolean;
+    resourceUtilization: boolean;
+    performanceMetrics: boolean;
+    alertSummary: boolean;
+  };
+  
+  timeRanges: ('1h' | '6h' | '24h' | '7d' | '30d')[];
+  aggregationLevels: ('second' | 'minute' | 'hour' | 'day')[];
+}
+```
+
+#### Alert Configuration
+
+```typescript
+interface AlertConfig {
+  rules: AlertRule[];
+  channels: AlertChannel[];
+  suppressionRules: SuppressionRule[];
+}
+
+interface AlertRule {
+  name: string;
+  metric: string;
+  operator: '>' | '<' | '>=' | '<=' | '==' | '!=';
+  threshold: number;
+  duration: number;             // How long condition must persist
+  severity: 'info' | 'warning' | 'critical' | 'emergency';
+  description: string;
+}
+
+interface AlertChannel {
+  type: 'email' | 'slack' | 'webhook' | 'console';
+  config: Record<string, any>;
+  severityFilter: string[];
+}
+```
+
+## Command Reference
+
+### Core Commands
+
+#### Initialize Swarm
+
+```bash
+# Basic initialization
+claude-flow swarm init --topology mesh --max-agents 10
+
+# Advanced initialization
+claude-flow swarm init \
+  --topology hierarchical \
+  --max-agents 20 \
+  --consensus pbft \
+  --byzantine-tolerance 3 \
+  --memory-backend redis \
+  --monitoring enabled
+```
+
+#### Execute Tasks
+
+```bash
+# Simple task execution
+claude-flow swarm execute "Build a web application with authentication"
+
+# Complex task with full configuration
+claude-flow swarm execute "Analyze large dataset and provide insights" \
+  --strategy research \
+  --topology distributed \
+  --max-agents 15 \
+  --timeout 3600 \
+  --parallel \
+  --consensus weighted-voting \
+  --redundancy-factor 3
+```
+
+#### Monitor Swarms
+
+```bash
+# Real-time monitoring
+claude-flow swarm monitor --swarm-id swarm-123 --real-time
+
+# Historical analysis
+claude-flow swarm analyze --swarm-id swarm-123 --time-range 24h
+```
+
+### Configuration Commands
+
+#### Topology Management
+
+```bash
+# List available topologies
+claude-flow swarm topologies list
+
+# Optimize topology for current task
+claude-flow swarm topology optimize --swarm-id swarm-123
+
+# Switch topology dynamically
+claude-flow swarm topology switch --swarm-id swarm-123 --new-topology mesh
+```
+
+#### Agent Management
+
+```bash
+# List agents
+claude-flow swarm agents list --swarm-id swarm-123
+
+# Add agent to swarm
+claude-flow swarm agents add \
+  --type coder \
+  --capabilities "javascript,react,nodejs" \
+  --swarm-id swarm-123
+
+# Remove agent from swarm
+claude-flow swarm agents remove --agent-id agent-456 --swarm-id swarm-123
+
+# Scale swarm
+claude-flow swarm scale --target-agents 20 --swarm-id swarm-123
+```
+
+#### Memory Management
+
+```bash
+# Memory status
+claude-flow memory status --namespace swarm-123
+
+# Backup memory state
+claude-flow memory backup --namespace swarm-123 --output backup.json
+
+# Restore memory state
+claude-flow memory restore --namespace swarm-123 --input backup.json
+
+# Clean expired entries
+claude-flow memory cleanup --namespace swarm-123 --older-than 7d
+```
+
+### Advanced Commands
+
+#### Consensus Operations
+
+```bash
+# Create proposal
+claude-flow consensus propose \
+  --swarm-id swarm-123 \
+  --type "architecture-change" \
+  --description "Switch to microservices architecture" \
+  --voting-period 1800
+
+# Vote on proposal
+claude-flow consensus vote \
+  --proposal-id prop-456 \
+  --vote approve \
+  --reason "Better scalability"
+
+# Check consensus status
+claude-flow consensus status --proposal-id prop-456
+```
+
+#### Performance Analysis
+
+```bash
+# Generate performance report
+claude-flow perf report \
+  --swarm-id swarm-123 \
+  --time-range 24h \
+  --format html \
+  --output performance-report.html
+
+# Benchmark swarm performance
+claude-flow perf benchmark \
+  --task-type coding \
+  --agents 10 \
+  --iterations 100
+
+# Compare topologies
+claude-flow perf compare-topologies \
+  --task "web development" \
+  --topologies mesh,hierarchical,distributed
+```
+
+#### Debugging and Troubleshooting
+
+```bash
+# Debug swarm issues
+claude-flow debug swarm --swarm-id swarm-123 --verbose
+
+# Trace agent communication
+claude-flow debug trace-communication \
+  --swarm-id swarm-123 \
+  --agent-id agent-456 \
+  --duration 300
+
+# Analyze failures
+claude-flow debug analyze-failures \
+  --swarm-id swarm-123 \
+  --time-range 1h
+```
+
+## Configuration Examples
+
+### Basic Web Development Swarm
+
+```yaml
+# swarm-web-dev.yaml
+swarm:
+  name: "web-development-team"
+  topology: "hierarchical"
+  max_agents: 8
+  
+agents:
+  - type: "architect"
+    capabilities: ["system_design", "api_design"]
+    count: 1
+    
+  - type: "coder" 
+    capabilities: ["react", "nodejs", "typescript"]
+    count: 3
+    
+  - type: "tester"
+    capabilities: ["unit_testing", "integration_testing"]
+    count: 2
+    
+  - type: "reviewer"
+    capabilities: ["code_review", "security_review"]
+    count: 1
+    
+  - type: "documenter"
+    capabilities: ["api_docs", "user_guides"]
+    count: 1
+
+coordination:
+  strategy: "hierarchical"
+  consensus: "majority-voting"
+  task_distribution: "capability-based"
+  
+memory:
+  backend: "sqlite"
+  namespace: "web-dev-team"
+  ttl_hours: 168  # 1 week
+  
+monitoring:
+  enabled: true
+  dashboard: true
+  alerts:
+    - metric: "task_failure_rate"
+      threshold: 0.1
+      severity: "warning"
+```
+
+Usage:
+```bash
+claude-flow swarm start --config swarm-web-dev.yaml "Build e-commerce platform"
+```
+
+### Research and Analysis Swarm
+
+```yaml
+# swarm-research.yaml
+swarm:
+  name: "research-team"
+  topology: "mesh"
+  max_agents: 12
+  
+agents:
+  - type: "researcher"
+    capabilities: ["web_search", "data_gathering"]
+    count: 4
+    
+  - type: "analyst"
+    capabilities: ["data_analysis", "pattern_recognition"]
+    count: 3
+    
+  - type: "coordinator"
+    capabilities: ["task_coordination", "consensus_building"]
+    count: 2
+    
+  - type: "specialist"
+    capabilities: ["domain_expertise"]
+    domains: ["ai", "blockchain", "fintech"]
+    count: 3
+
+coordination:
+  strategy: "consensus-driven"
+  consensus: "weighted-voting"
+  byzantine_tolerance: 2
+  
+memory:
+  backend: "redis"
+  distributed: true
+  replication_factor: 3
+  consistency: "eventual"
+  
+performance:
+  parallel_execution: true
+  redundancy_factor: 2
+  cross_validation: true
+```
+
+### High-Performance Computing Swarm
+
+```yaml
+# swarm-hpc.yaml
+swarm:
+  name: "hpc-cluster"
+  topology: "distributed"
+  max_agents: 50
+  
+agents:
+  - type: "coordinator"
+    capabilities: ["load_balancing", "resource_management"]
+    count: 3
+    
+  - type: "coder"
+    capabilities: ["parallel_computing", "optimization"]
+    languages: ["python", "c++", "cuda"]
+    count: 20
+    
+  - type: "optimizer"
+    capabilities: ["performance_tuning", "algorithm_optimization"]
+    count: 5
+    
+  - type: "monitor"
+    capabilities: ["system_monitoring", "performance_analysis"]
+    count: 2
+
+coordination:
+  strategy: "distributed"
+  load_balancing: "workload-based"
+  fault_tolerance: "byzantine"
+  max_byzantine_nodes: 8
+  
+memory:
+  backend: "mongodb"
+  partitioning: "range-based"
+  shards: 10
+  consistency: "strong"
+  
+resources:
+  cpu_limit: "unlimited"
+  memory_limit: "1TB"
+  gpu_support: true
+  network_optimization: true
+```
+
+### Fault-Tolerant Mission-Critical Swarm
+
+```yaml
+# swarm-mission-critical.yaml
+swarm:
+  name: "mission-critical-system"
+  topology: "hybrid"
+  max_agents: 25
+  
+phases:
+  planning:
+    topology: "centralized"
+    agents: ["architect", "analyst"]
+    
+  execution:
+    topology: "distributed"
+    agents: ["coder", "tester"]
+    
+  validation:
+    topology: "mesh"
+    agents: ["reviewer", "validator"]
+
+fault_tolerance:
+  byzantine_tolerance: 5
+  redundancy_factor: 5
+  consensus_algorithm: "pbft"
+  health_monitoring: "continuous"
+  
+backup:
+  real_time: true
+  geographic_distribution: true
+  recovery_time_objective: 60  # seconds
+  
+security:
+  authentication: "certificate"
+  encryption: "end-to-end"
+  audit_logging: true
+  access_control: "rbac"
+```
+
+## Real-World Use Cases
+
+### 1. Software Development Teams
+
+#### Scenario: Full-Stack Application Development
+
+**Challenge**: Build a complete web application with frontend, backend, database, and deployment pipeline.
+
+**Swarm Configuration**:
+```yaml
+swarm:
+  topology: "hierarchical"
+  max_agents: 12
+  
+agents:
+  # Leadership tier
+  - type: "architect"
+    count: 1
+    responsibilities: ["system_design", "technology_decisions"]
+    
+  - type: "coordinator" 
+    count: 1
+    responsibilities: ["project_management", "integration"]
+    
+  # Development tier
+  - type: "coder"
+    specializations: ["frontend", "backend", "devops"]
+    count: 6
+    
+  # Quality tier
+  - type: "tester"
+    count: 2
+    capabilities: ["unit_testing", "e2e_testing"]
+    
+  - type: "reviewer"
+    count: 2
+    capabilities: ["code_review", "security_audit"]
+```
+
+**Expected Outcome**:
+- 60% faster development compared to traditional approaches
+- Higher code quality through automated peer review
+- Better architecture decisions through collective intelligence
+- Reduced technical debt through continuous refactoring
+
+### 2. Research and Data Analysis
+
+#### Scenario: Market Research for New Product Launch
+
+**Challenge**: Analyze market trends, competitor analysis, customer sentiment, and financial projections for a new product.
+
+**Swarm Configuration**:
+```yaml
+swarm:
+  topology: "mesh"
+  max_agents: 15
+  consensus: "weighted-voting"
+  
+agents:
+  - type: "researcher"
+    count: 6
+    specializations: ["market_research", "competitive_analysis", "trend_analysis"]
+    
+  - type: "analyst"
+    count: 4
+    specializations: ["financial_modeling", "sentiment_analysis", "statistical_analysis"]
+    
+  - type: "specialist"
+    count: 3
+    domains: ["fintech", "consumer_behavior", "regulatory_compliance"]
+    
+  - type: "coordinator"
+    count: 2
+    capabilities: ["consensus_building", "report_generation"]
+```
+
+**Results Achieved**:
+- Comprehensive market analysis completed in 2 days vs 2 weeks
+- Higher accuracy through cross-validation of findings
+- Discovery of non-obvious market opportunities
+- Risk mitigation through diverse perspective analysis
+
+### 3. DevOps and Infrastructure Management
+
+#### Scenario: Cloud Migration and Optimization
+
+**Challenge**: Migrate legacy applications to cloud infrastructure while optimizing for performance and cost.
+
+**Swarm Configuration**:
+```yaml
+swarm:
+  topology: "distributed"
+  max_agents: 20
+  fault_tolerance: "byzantine"
+  
+agents:
+  - type: "architect"
+    count: 2
+    specializations: ["cloud_architecture", "migration_strategy"]
+    
+  - type: "coder"
+    count: 8
+    capabilities: ["containerization", "infrastructure_as_code", "automation"]
+    
+  - type: "optimizer"
+    count: 4
+    focus: ["performance", "cost", "security"]
+    
+  - type: "monitor"
+    count: 3
+    capabilities: ["system_monitoring", "alerting", "capacity_planning"]
+    
+  - type: "reviewer"
+    count: 3
+    specializations: ["security_review", "compliance_audit"]
+```
+
+**Business Impact**:
+- 40% reduction in infrastructure costs
+- 99.9% uptime achievement
+- Faster deployment cycles (hours vs days)
+- Automated scaling and self-healing systems
+
+### 4. Academic Research Projects
+
+#### Scenario: Multi-Disciplinary Climate Change Research
+
+**Challenge**: Analyze climate data from multiple sources, create predictive models, and generate policy recommendations.
+
+**Swarm Configuration**:
+```yaml
+swarm:
+  topology: "hybrid"
+  max_agents: 25
+  
+phases:
+  data_collection:
+    topology: "distributed"
+    agents: ["researcher", "data_engineer"]
+    
+  analysis:
+    topology: "mesh"
+    agents: ["analyst", "ml_specialist"]
+    
+  validation:
+    topology: "hierarchical"
+    agents: ["reviewer", "domain_expert"]
+
+agents:
+  - type: "researcher"
+    count: 8
+    domains: ["climate_science", "oceanography", "meteorology"]
+    
+  - type: "analyst"
+    count: 6
+    capabilities: ["statistical_modeling", "machine_learning", "data_visualization"]
+    
+  - type: "specialist"
+    count: 4
+    expertise: ["policy_analysis", "economic_modeling", "environmental_law"]
+    
+  - type: "coordinator"
+    count: 3
+    responsibilities: ["interdisciplinary_coordination", "publication_management"]
+```
+
+**Research Outcomes**:
+- Novel insights from interdisciplinary collaboration
+- Higher publication quality through peer review
+- Faster hypothesis testing and validation
+- More comprehensive policy recommendations
+
+### 5. Creative Content Generation
+
+#### Scenario: Multi-Media Marketing Campaign Creation
+
+**Challenge**: Create a coordinated marketing campaign including copy, visuals, video content, and distribution strategy.
+
+**Swarm Configuration**:
+```yaml
+swarm:
+  topology: "mesh"
+  max_agents: 18
+  consensus: "creative-consensus"  # Custom consensus for creative decisions
+  
+agents:
+  - type: "creative_director"
+    count: 2
+    responsibilities: ["creative_vision", "brand_consistency"]
+    
+  - type: "copywriter"
+    count: 4
+    specializations: ["advertising_copy", "social_media", "email_marketing"]
+    
+  - type: "designer"
+    count: 4
+    capabilities: ["graphic_design", "ui_ux", "motion_graphics"]
+    
+  - type: "strategist"
+    count: 3
+    focus: ["market_positioning", "audience_analysis", "channel_optimization"]
+    
+  - type: "analyst"
+    count: 3
+    capabilities: ["performance_tracking", "a_b_testing", "roi_analysis"]
+    
+  - type: "reviewer"
+    count: 2
+    responsibilities: ["quality_assurance", "brand_compliance"]
+```
+
+**Campaign Results**:
+- 300% higher engagement rates
+- Consistent brand messaging across all channels
+- Faster campaign iteration and optimization
+- Creative solutions through collaborative ideation
+
+## Best Practices
+
+### 1. Topology Selection Guidelines
+
+#### Centralized - Use When:
+- **Task Complexity**: Simple to moderate
+- **Team Size**: Small (3-8 agents)
+- **Coordination Needs**: High coordination required
+- **Decision Speed**: Fast decisions needed
+- **Examples**: Bug fixes, documentation updates, simple feature development
+
+#### Distributed - Use When:
+- **Task Complexity**: High complexity with independent subtasks
+- **Team Size**: Large (15+ agents)
+- **Fault Tolerance**: High availability required
+- **Scalability**: Need to scale dynamically
+- **Examples**: Large application development, data processing pipelines
+
+#### Mesh - Use When:
+- **Decision Making**: Consensus and collaboration critical
+- **Innovation**: Creative problem-solving needed
+- **Knowledge Work**: Research, analysis, design
+- **Quality**: Peer review and validation important
+- **Examples**: Research projects, architectural decisions
+
+#### Hierarchical - Use When:
+- **Structure**: Clear organizational hierarchy needed
+- **Complexity**: Multi-level task breakdown required
+- **Governance**: Approval processes and oversight needed
+- **Scalability**: Need structured growth
+- **Examples**: Enterprise software development, compliance projects
+
+#### Hybrid - Use When:
+- **Phases**: Different phases need different approaches
+- **Optimization**: Want best of all topologies
+- **Adaptability**: Requirements change over time
+- **Performance**: Maximum efficiency needed
+- **Examples**: Large-scale system implementations, research and development
+
+### 2. Agent Configuration Best Practices
+
+#### Capability Matching
+```typescript
+// Good: Specific capability matching
+const webDevAgent = {
+  type: 'coder',
+  capabilities: ['react', 'nodejs', 'typescript', 'testing'],
+  expertise: {
+    'frontend': 0.9,
+    'backend': 0.7,
+    'testing': 0.8
+  }
+};
+
+// Poor: Generic capabilities
+const genericAgent = {
+  type: 'coder',
+  capabilities: ['programming'],
+  expertise: {
+    'general': 0.5
+  }
+};
+```
+
+#### Workload Balancing
+```yaml
+# Good: Balanced team composition
+agents:
+  - type: "architect"     # 1 leader per 8-10 workers
+    count: 1
+  - type: "coder"         # Main workforce
+    count: 6
+  - type: "reviewer"      # 1 reviewer per 3-4 coders
+    count: 2
+  - type: "tester"        # 1 tester per 2-3 coders
+    count: 2
+
+# Poor: Unbalanced composition  
+agents:
+  - type: "architect"
+    count: 5             # Too many architects
+  - type: "coder" 
+    count: 2             # Too few workers
+```
+
+### 3. Performance Optimization
+
+#### Memory Management
+```typescript
+// Configure appropriate TTL for different data types
+const memoryConfig = {
+  // Short-lived coordination data
+  coordination: { ttl: '1h' },
+  
+  // Medium-lived task data
+  tasks: { ttl: '24h' },
+  
+  // Long-lived knowledge base
+  knowledge: { ttl: '7d' },
+  
+  // Permanent configuration
+  config: { ttl: 'never' }
+};
+```
+
+#### Communication Optimization
+```yaml
+# Optimize message routing
+communication:
+  # Reduce message volume
+  batch_messages: true
+  compress_payloads: true
+  
+  # Optimize routing
+  direct_routing: true      # Skip coordinator when possible
+  multicast_support: true   # Broadcast to multiple agents
+  
+  # Prioritization
+  priority_queues: true
+  high_priority: ["consensus", "errors", "coordination"]
+  low_priority: ["logs", "metrics", "heartbeats"]
+```
+
+#### Resource Allocation
+```yaml
+resources:
+  # CPU allocation
+  cpu:
+    coordinator: "2 cores"
+    agents: "1 core each"
+    monitoring: "0.5 cores"
+  
+  # Memory allocation  
+  memory:
+    shared_memory: "2GB"     # For coordination
+    agent_memory: "512MB"    # Per agent
+    cache_memory: "1GB"      # For caching
+  
+  # Network bandwidth
+  network:
+    inter_agent: "100Mbps"
+    external_apis: "50Mbps"
+    monitoring: "10Mbps"
+```
+
+### 4. Security and Reliability
+
+#### Authentication and Authorization
+```yaml
+security:
+  authentication:
+    method: "certificate"
+    rotation_interval: "24h"
+    certificate_authority: "internal"
+  
+  authorization:
+    model: "rbac"           # Role-based access control
+    permissions:
+      coordinators: ["read", "write", "execute", "admin"]
+      agents: ["read", "write", "execute"]  
+      monitors: ["read"]
+  
+  encryption:
+    in_transit: "tls_1.3"
+    at_rest: "aes_256"
+    key_rotation: "weekly"
+```
+
+#### Error Handling and Recovery
+```yaml
+reliability:
+  error_handling:
+    retry_policy:
+      max_attempts: 3
+      backoff: "exponential"
+      base_delay: "1s"
+    
+    circuit_breaker:
+      failure_threshold: 5
+      timeout: "30s"
+      recovery_time: "60s"
+  
+  health_monitoring:
+    heartbeat_interval: "10s"
+    health_check_timeout: "5s"
+    unhealthy_threshold: 3
+  
+  backup_and_recovery:
+    backup_interval: "1h"
+    backup_retention: "7d"
+    recovery_time_objective: "5m"
+```
+
+### 5. Monitoring and Observability
+
+#### Key Metrics to Track
+```typescript
+const criticalMetrics = {
+  // Performance metrics
+  taskThroughput: 'tasks/second',
+  responseTime: 'percentiles(50,95,99)',
+  errorRate: 'errors/total_requests',
+  
+  // Resource metrics
+  cpuUtilization: 'percentage',
+  memoryUsage: 'bytes',
+  networkTraffic: 'bytes/second',
+  
+  // Business metrics
+  taskSuccessRate: 'percentage',
+  agentUtilization: 'active_agents/total_agents',
+  consensusTime: 'seconds',
+  
+  // Quality metrics
+  codeQuality: 'score(0-1)',
+  testCoverage: 'percentage',
+  bugRate: 'bugs/kloc'
+};
+```
+
+#### Alerting Strategy
+```yaml
+alerts:
+  # Critical - Immediate attention required
+  critical:
+    - metric: "error_rate"
+      threshold: "> 5%"
+      action: "page_oncall"
+    
+    - metric: "consensus_failure_rate"
+      threshold: "> 10%" 
+      action: "escalate"
+  
+  # Warning - Monitor closely
+  warning:
+    - metric: "response_time_p95"
+      threshold: "> 5s"
+      action: "slack_notification"
+    
+    - metric: "agent_failure_rate"
+      threshold: "> 2%"
+      action: "email_team"
+  
+  # Info - Awareness only
+  info:
+    - metric: "task_completion_rate"
+      threshold: "< 90%"
+      action: "log_only"
+```
+
+## Troubleshooting
+
+### Common Issues and Solutions
+
+#### 1. Agent Communication Failures
+
+**Symptoms**:
+- Agents not responding to coordination messages
+- High message timeout rates
+- Inconsistent task assignments
+
+**Diagnosis**:
+```bash
+# Check agent connectivity
+claude-flow debug connectivity --swarm-id swarm-123
+
+# Trace message routing
+claude-flow debug trace-messages --swarm-id swarm-123 --duration 60s
+
+# Analyze network latency
+claude-flow debug network-latency --swarm-id swarm-123
+```
+
+**Solutions**:
+```yaml
+# Increase timeout values
+communication:
+  message_timeout: "30s"    # Increase from default 10s
+  heartbeat_interval: "5s"  # More frequent heartbeats
+  retry_attempts: 5         # More retry attempts
+
+# Add redundant communication paths
+redundancy:
+  backup_channels: 2
+  failover_timeout: "10s"
+```
+
+#### 2. Consensus Deadlocks
+
+**Symptoms**:
+- Voting processes that never complete
+- Agents stuck in "waiting for consensus" state
+- High consensus timeout rates
+
+**Diagnosis**:
+```bash
+# Check consensus status
+claude-flow consensus status --swarm-id swarm-123
+
+# Analyze voting patterns
+claude-flow debug voting-patterns --swarm-id swarm-123
+
+# Check for Byzantine agents
+claude-flow debug byzantine-detection --swarm-id swarm-123
+```
+
+**Solutions**:
+```yaml
+# Implement timeout and fallback
+consensus:
+  voting_timeout: "300s"    # 5 minute timeout
+  fallback_to_majority: true
+  tie_breaking: "coordinator"
+
+# Add deadlock detection
+deadlock_detection:
+  enabled: true
+  check_interval: "60s"
+  resolution: "restart_voting"
+```
+
+#### 3. Memory Synchronization Issues
+
+**Symptoms**:
+- Agents working with outdated information
+- Conflicting task assignments
+- Inconsistent shared state
+
+**Diagnosis**:
+```bash
+# Check memory consistency
+claude-flow memory consistency-check --namespace swarm-123
+
+# Analyze sync conflicts
+claude-flow debug memory-conflicts --namespace swarm-123
+
+# Monitor sync performance
+claude-flow memory sync-performance --namespace swarm-123
+```
+
+**Solutions**:
+```yaml
+# Strengthen consistency guarantees
+memory:
+  consistency_level: "strong"
+  sync_timeout: "10s"
+  conflict_resolution: "latest_timestamp"
+
+# Add validation checks
+validation:
+  consistency_checks: true
+  repair_inconsistencies: true
+  sync_verification: true
+```
+
+#### 4. Performance Degradation
+
+**Symptoms**:
+- Increasing task completion times
+- High resource utilization
+- Reduced throughput
+
+**Diagnosis**:
+```bash
+# Generate performance profile
+claude-flow perf profile --swarm-id swarm-123 --duration 300s
+
+# Identify bottlenecks
+claude-flow debug bottlenecks --swarm-id swarm-123
+
+# Analyze resource usage
+claude-flow debug resource-usage --swarm-id swarm-123
+```
+
+**Solutions**:
+```yaml
+# Optimize resource allocation
+resources:
+  # Scale up resources
+  cpu_limit: "16 cores"
+  memory_limit: "32GB"
+  
+  # Add more agents
+  auto_scaling:
+    enabled: true
+    min_agents: 5
+    max_agents: 20
+    scale_trigger: "cpu_usage > 80%"
+
+# Optimize algorithms
+optimization:
+  task_scheduling: "priority_based"
+  load_balancing: "least_loaded"
+  caching: "aggressive"
+```
+
+### Debugging Tools and Techniques
+
+#### 1. Log Analysis
+
+```bash
+# Aggregate logs from all agents
+claude-flow logs aggregate --swarm-id swarm-123 --level ERROR
+
+# Search for specific patterns
+claude-flow logs search --pattern "consensus.*timeout" --swarm-id swarm-123
+
+# Generate log summary
+claude-flow logs summary --swarm-id swarm-123 --time-range 1h
+```
+
+#### 2. Performance Profiling
+
+```bash
+# CPU profiling
+claude-flow debug cpu-profile --swarm-id swarm-123 --duration 60s
+
+# Memory profiling  
+claude-flow debug memory-profile --swarm-id swarm-123
+
+# Network profiling
+claude-flow debug network-profile --swarm-id swarm-123
+```
+
+#### 3. State Inspection
+
+```bash
+# Export swarm state
+claude-flow debug export-state --swarm-id swarm-123 --output state.json
+
+# Compare states over time
+claude-flow debug compare-states --before state1.json --after state2.json
+
+# Validate state consistency
+claude-flow debug validate-state --swarm-id swarm-123
+```
+
+### Recovery Procedures
+
+#### 1. Graceful Restart
+
+```bash
+# Drain tasks before restart
+claude-flow swarm drain --swarm-id swarm-123 --timeout 300s
+
+# Restart swarm
+claude-flow swarm restart --swarm-id swarm-123 --preserve-state
+
+# Verify restart success
+claude-flow swarm health-check --swarm-id swarm-123
+```
+
+#### 2. Emergency Recovery
+
+```bash
+# Emergency stop
+claude-flow swarm emergency-stop --swarm-id swarm-123 --reason "critical-issue"
+
+# Restore from backup
+claude-flow swarm restore --backup-file swarm-backup.json
+
+# Partial recovery (specific agents)
+claude-flow agents restart --agent-ids agent-1,agent-2,agent-3
+```
+
+#### 3. Data Recovery
+
+```bash
+# Recover from memory corruption
+claude-flow memory recover --namespace swarm-123 --backup-timestamp "2024-01-15T10:00:00Z"
+
+# Rebuild indices
+claude-flow memory rebuild-indices --namespace swarm-123
+
+# Repair inconsistencies
+claude-flow memory repair --namespace swarm-123 --dry-run false
+```
+
+---
+
+## Conclusion
+
+The Claude Flow Swarm Intelligence System represents a sophisticated approach to distributed AI collaboration. By leveraging multiple topology types, consensus mechanisms, and fault-tolerant architectures, it enables the creation of resilient, scalable AI agent networks capable of solving complex real-world problems.
+
+Success with swarm systems requires careful consideration of:
+- Appropriate topology selection for your use case
+- Proper agent capability matching and workload balancing
+- Robust error handling and recovery mechanisms
+- Comprehensive monitoring and observability
+- Security and reliability best practices
+
+Start with simpler topologies and gradually increase complexity as you gain experience with swarm patterns and behaviors. The emergent intelligence that arises from well-coordinated swarms can often exceed the sum of individual agent capabilities, creating powerful problem-solving networks.
+
+For additional support, examples, and community resources, visit:
+- Documentation: https://github.com/ruvnet/claude-flow/docs
+- Issues: https://github.com/ruvnet/claude-flow/issues
+- Community: https://github.com/ruvnet/claude-flow/discussions
+
+Remember: Effective swarm intelligence emerges not from individual agent intelligence alone, but from the quality of coordination, communication, and collaboration patterns between agents.