claude-flow-novice 2.8.1 → 2.9.0

package/.claude/architecture/mesh-get-polling-design.md

@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
-# Mesh Test: GET Polling Architecture Design
-
-## Overview
-This architecture implements a mesh-based communication pattern using Redis GET polling for retrieving research results asynchronously.
-
-## Key Components
-1. **Researcher Agent**: Produces results
-2. **Architect Agent**: Consumes results via polling
-3. **Redis**: Intermediate message broker and state storage
-
-## Communication Pattern
-- **Publish-Subscribe Hybrid**:
-  - Researcher publishes results to Redis
-  - Architect polls via GET method
-  - Supports decoupled, resilient communication
-
-## Polling Mechanism
-- **Polling Strategy**:
-  - Timeout: 60 seconds
-  - Interval: 1-second checks
-  - Maximum cycles: 60
-- **State Management**:
-  - Key: `swarm:mesh:researcher:result`
-  - Value: JSON-encoded research result
-  - Atomic GET operations
-
-## Error Handling
-- Timeout after 60 seconds
-- Graceful failure with exit code 1
-- Explicit cycle count tracking
-
-## Performance Considerations
-- Low overhead polling
-- Non-blocking architecture
-- Minimal Redis load
-
-## Security & Access Control
-- Use Redis ACLs for key access
-- Implement temporary key expiration
-- Secure result storage
-
-## Implementation Pseudocode
-```python
-def poll_for_result(key='swarm:mesh:researcher:result', timeout=60):
-    start_time = current_time()
-    cycles = 0
-
-    while (current_time() - start_time) < timeout:
-        result = redis.get(key)
-        if result is not None:
-            return {
-                'status': 'success',
-                'data': parse_json(result),
-                'cycles': cycles
-            }
-
-        sleep(1)  # Poll interval
-        cycles += 1
-
-    return {
-        'status': 'timeout',
-        'cycles': cycles
-    }
-```
-
-## Mesh Network Characteristics
-- **Topology**: Flat mesh
-- **Node Communication**: Non-hierarchical
-- **Scaling**: O(1) complexity
-- **Fault Tolerance**: High (independent polling)
-
-## Monitoring & Telemetry
-- Cycle count tracking
-- Polling duration measurement
-- Result retrieval success rate
-
-## Recommended Improvements
-1. Exponential backoff for polling
-2. Circuit breaker mechanism
-3. Distributed tracing integration
-4. Advanced error categorization
-
-## Compliance
-- Follows Redis pub/sub best practices
-- Aligns with Claude Flow Novice coordination guidelines
-- Uses ephemeral, secure key storage
-```

package/.claude/architecture/mesh-get-polling-implementation.md

@@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
-# Mesh GET Polling: Implementation Guide
-
-## Technical Specifications
-
-### Redis Configuration
-```bash
-# Redis ACL configuration for secure access
-redis-cli ACL SETUSER mesh-reader +get +@read ~swarm:mesh:*
-```
-
-### Implementation Patterns
-
-#### Researcher Agent (Result Producer)
-```python
-def publish_research_result(result):
-    redis_client.set(
-        'swarm:mesh:researcher:result',
-        json.dumps(result),
-        ex=120  # 2-minute expiration
-    )
-```
-
-#### Architect Agent (Result Consumer)
-```python
-def poll_research_result(timeout=60, interval=1):
-    start_time = time.time()
-    cycles = 0
-
-    while time.time() - start_time < timeout:
-        result = redis_client.get('swarm:mesh:researcher:result')
-
-        if result is not None:
-            parsed_result = json.loads(result)
-            return {
-                'status': 'success',
-                'data': parsed_result,
-                'cycles': cycles
-            }
-
-        time.sleep(interval)
-        cycles += 1
-
-    return {
-        'status': 'timeout',
-        'message': f'No result after {cycles} cycles',
-        'cycles': cycles
-    }
-```
-
-### Error Handling Strategy
-1. Timeout with explicit exit
-2. Cycle tracking
-3. Structured result object
-4. Graceful degradation
-
-### Performance Optimization
-- Use minimal payload
-- Implement key expiration
-- Low-frequency polling
-- Non-blocking architecture
-
-### Monitoring Hooks
-```python
-def log_polling_metrics(result):
-    metrics = {
-        'status': result['status'],
-        'cycles': result.get('cycles', 0),
-        'timestamp': datetime.now().isoformat()
-    }
-    send_to_monitoring_system(metrics)
-```
-
-### Security Considerations
-- Temporary key with short TTL
-- Restricted Redis ACLs
-- JSON payload validation
-- Minimal exposure window
-
-### Scaling Recommendations
-- Horizontal scaling via multiple independent pollers
-- Circuit breaker for repeated failures
-- Distributed tracing integration
-
-### Compliance Checklist
-- ✅ Uses Redis pub/sub pattern
-- ✅ Follows Claude Flow Novice guidelines
-- ✅ Implements secure, ephemeral key storage
-- ✅ Supports decoupled agent communication
-```

package/.claude/architecture/typescript-microservices.md

@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
-# TypeScript Microservices Architecture
-
-## Overview
-A modular microservices architecture leveraging TypeScript's advanced type system to create a robust, maintainable, and performant software ecosystem.
-
-## Key Design Principles
-1. **Maximum Type Safety**
-   - Utilize TypeScript's strict type checking
-   - Prevent runtime errors through compile-time type validation
-   - Implement comprehensive type definitions across all services
-
-2. **Compile-Time Error Prevention**
-   - Enforce strict null checks
-   - Use discriminated unions for error handling
-   - Implement comprehensive interface contracts
-
-3. **Advanced IDE Integration**
-   - Leverage TypeScript's rich IDE support
-   - Use advanced refactoring and intellisense features
-   - Implement project-wide type definitions
-
-4. **Gradual Type Adoption**
-   - Support incremental typing strategy
-   - Allow mixed JavaScript/TypeScript codebases
-   - Provide clear migration paths
-
-## Architectural Benefits
-- Enhanced code maintainability
-- Reduced runtime errors
-- Improved developer productivity
-- Performance optimizations through static typing
-
-## Microservices Strategy
-- Independent, loosely coupled services
-- Event-driven communication
-- Shared type definitions via common libraries
-- Independent deployment and scaling
-
-## Recommended Technology Stack
-- Runtime: Node.js
-- Framework: NestJS or Express with TypeScript
-- Messaging: RabbitMQ or Kafka
-- API Gateway: Apollo GraphQL
-- Containerization: Docker
-- Orchestration: Kubernetes
-
-## Confidence and Validation
-- Research Confidence: 0.90
-- Design Alignment: High
-- Key Validators: Researcher Agent

package/.claude/artifacts/ace-reflections/REFLECT-001-summary.json

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "reflection_id": "REFLECT-001",
-  "curation_status": "complete",
-  "timestamp": "2025-10-21T12:15:00Z",
-  "curator_agent": "context-curator",
-  "new_bullets_added": [
-    {
-      "id": "PATTERN-009",
-      "category": "pattern",
-      "title": "Multi-Pattern Confidence Parsing",
-      "confidence": 0.95,
-      "priority": 9
-    },
-    {
-      "id": "STRAT-014",
-      "category": "strategy",
-      "title": "Skill Interface Consistency",
-      "confidence": 0.90,
-      "priority": 8
-    },
-    {
-      "id": "EDGE-012",
-      "category": "edge_case",
-      "title": "Output Processing Error Handling",
-      "confidence": 0.88,
-      "priority": 7
-    }
-  ],
-  "recommended_next_steps": [
-    "Update orchestration documentation with new parsing strategies",
-    "Enhance test coverage for output processing skills",
-    "Create comprehensive fallback parsing reference"
-  ],
-  "metrics": {
-    "total_active_bullets": 25,
-    "average_confidence": 0.88,
-    "curation_confidence": 0.95
-  }
-}

package/.claude/artifacts/ace-reflections/sprint-7_$(date -u +/"%Y%m%d_%H%M%S/").json"

@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-{
-    "sprint": 7,
-    "lessons": [
-        {
-            "bullet_id": "STRAT-007",
-            "category": "strategy",
-            "content": "When implementing long-running orchestration workflows (>10 minutes), use background execution with Redis-based status monitoring instead of synchronous Bash calls. Bash tool has hard 10-minute timeout limit that cannot be extended.",
-            "confidence": 0.95,
-            "tags": ["orchestration", "bash-timeout", "redis-monitoring", "background-execution"]
-        },
-        {
-            "bullet_id": "PATTERN-008",
-            "category": "pattern",
-            "content": "Implement a strategic Product Owner decision flow that provides explicit PROCEED/ITERATE/ABORT options after Loop 2 consensus to prevent validator scope creep and maintain clear workflow boundaries.",
-            "confidence": 0.90,
-            "tags": ["workflow-management", "consensus", "product-owner", "decision-flow"]
-        },
-        {
-            "bullet_id": "EDGE-005",
-            "category": "edge_case",
-            "content": "Enforce strict agent ID consistency across orchestrator and CLI spawning by using iteration-suffixed tracking arrays and dynamic agent selection based on task keywords to prevent orchestrator hanging.",
-            "confidence": 0.88,
-            "tags": ["agent-management", "id-tracking", "spawning", "consistency"]
-        },
-        {
-            "bullet_id": "OPT-006",
-            "category": "optimization",
-            "content": "Implement token limit strategies with headroom, targeting 10K tokens with a hard limit of 16K, and use incremental output patterns to handle complex, multi-stage agent workflows.",
-            "confidence": 0.85,
-            "tags": ["token-management", "llm-optimization", "incremental-processing"]
-        },
-        {
-            "bullet_id": "ANTI-004",
-            "category": "anti_pattern",
-            "content": "Avoid using simplistic regex matching for agent validation, such as `[[ \" $AGENTS \" =~ \" $AGENTS \" ]]`, which creates false-positive matches and breaks agent tracking logic.",
-            "confidence": 0.92,
-            "tags": ["regex", "validation", "agent-tracking", "error-prevention"]
-        },
-        {
-            "bullet_id": "DOMAIN-003",
-            "category": "domain_insight",
-            "content": "Design orchestration systems with explicit, unbound state management for tracking agent completion, ensuring that components like LOOP2_COMPLETED_AGENTS can handle dynamic workflow iterations without premature termination.",
-            "confidence": 0.87,
-            "tags": ["orchestration", "state-management", "workflow-design", "agent-coordination"]
-        }
-    ]
-}

package/.claude/artifacts/reflection-merge-logs/cli-agent-spawning-v2.5.2-merge-report.md

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
-# Reflection Curation Report: CLI Agent Spawning v2.5.2
-
-## Merge Actions Performed:
-
-**1. PATTERN-001: Environment Configuration Strategy**
-- Action: ADD_NEW_BULLET
-- Reasoning: Novel insight about CLI environment loading
-- Priority: 9/10 (critical)
-- Confidence: 0.95
-- Tags: environment, configuration, cli, dotenv
-
-**2. PATTERN-002: API Provider Integration**
-- Action: ADD_NEW_BULLET
-- Reasoning: Novel domain insight for multi-provider systems
-- Priority: 8/10 (critical)
-- Confidence: 0.92
-- Tags: api-integration, provider-mapping, resilience, configuration
-
-**3. PATTERN-003: Streaming Compatibility**
-- Action: ADD_NEW_BULLET
-- Reasoning: Novel optimization pattern for API compatibility
-- Priority: 7/10 (important)
-- Confidence: 0.88
-- Tags: streaming, api-compatibility, fallback, optimization
-
-**4. PATTERN-004: Resilient API Calls**
-- Action: ADD_NEW_BULLET
-- Reasoning: Critical edge case handling pattern
-- Priority: 9/10 (critical)
-- Confidence: 0.90
-- Tags: error-handling, timeout, resilience, api-calls
-
-**5. PATTERN-005: Development Testing Anti-Pattern**
-- Action: ADD_NEW_BULLET
-- Reasoning: Helpful anti-pattern to avoid
-- Priority: 6/10 (helpful)
-- Confidence: 0.85
-- Tags: testing, development, package-management, build-verification
-
-## Merge Metadata
-
-- **Reflection ID**: cli-agent-spawning-v2.5.2
-- **Curator Status**: Merged
-- **Merge Timestamp**: 2025-10-20T10:49:00Z
-- **Total Bullets Added**: 5
-- **Average Confidence**: 0.90
-
-## Recommended Next Actions
-
-1. Context Injection:
-```bash
-/context-inject --category=strategy,domain_insight,edge_case
-```
-
-2. Monitor Usage:
-- Track helpful/harmful feedback for these patterns
-- Consider integration into agent-specific prompts for CLI development
-
-3. Follow-up Validation:
-- Run comprehensive tests validating these patterns
-- Collect real-world usage data to confirm effectiveness

package/.claude/cfn-loop-rules.md

@@ -1,73 +0,0 @@
-## Loop Structure (Updated DEFER vs LOOP Logic)
-
-Loop 0: Epic/Sprint orchestration (multi-phase) → no iteration limit
-Loop 0.5: Planning consensus (Enterprise only) → architects vote on design; ≥0.85 consensus
-Loop 1: Phase execution (sequential phases) → no limit
-Loop 2: Consensus validation (2-4 validators) → max 5-15/phase; exit at ≥0.80-0.95
-Loop 3: Primary swarm implementation → max 5-15/subtask; exit when all ≥0.70-0.75
-Loop 4: Product Owner decision gate (Enhanced Decision Framework)
-
-### Decision Framework
-
-1. **PROCEED** - Consensus ≥ threshold, criteria met → advance to next sprint/phase
-   - Criteria: All quality gates passed
-   - Action: Move directly to next phase
-   - Confidence: >0.90 across all validators
-
-2. **LOOP** - Consensus < threshold, fixable issues → relaunch Loop 3 with targeted fixes
-   - Criteria: Specific, actionable improvements identified
-   - Action: Relaunch previous loop with focused agent assignments
-   - Max Iterations: 
-     - MVP: 5 iterations
-     - Standard: 10 iterations
-     - Enterprise: 15 iterations
-   - Requires specific, in-scope improvement recommendations
-
-3. **DEFER** - Out-of-scope, lower priority → backlog management without blocking progress
-   - Criteria: 
-     - Items are genuinely out-of-scope
-     - Do not block current phase completion
-     - Maintain clear backlog visibility
-   - Action: 
-     - Add to backlog.json with priority and context
-     - Proceed with current phase
-     - Ensure TodoWrite tracks deferred items
-   - Create comprehensive backlog entry with:
-     - Title
-     - Description
-     - Priority (critical/high/medium/low)
-     - Estimated cost
-     - Target phase/iteration
-     - Rationale for deferral
-
-4. **ESCALATE** - Blocked, ambiguous, critical conflict → require human decision
-   - Criteria:
-     - Unresolvable conflicts
-     - Critical architectural changes
-     - Potential compliance or security risks
-     - Requires stakeholder input
-   - Action: 
-     - Generate comprehensive escalation report
-     - Halt current phase progression
-     - Request explicit human review and decision
-
-### Iteration and Escalation Rules
-
-**Iteration Limits**:
-- MVP Mode: Max 5 iterations per loop
-- Standard Mode: Max 10 iterations per loop
-- Enterprise Mode: Max 15 iterations per loop
-
-**Escalation Triggers**:
-- Iteration limit reached
-- Critical security vulnerabilities
-- Compliance risks
-- Major architectural changes
-- Budget/timeline significant deviation
-- Stakeholder approval required
-
-**Backlog Management**:
-- ALWAYS use TodoWrite to track deferred items
-- Persist backlog items to SQLite with 365-day retention
-- Include full context and deferral rationale
-- Prioritize and tag for future phases