claude-code-workflow 6.3.18 → 6.3.20

package/.claude/skills/command-guide/reference/commands/workflow/tools/context-gather.md

@@ -1,433 +0,0 @@
----
-name: gather
-description: Intelligently collect project context using context-search-agent based on task description, packages into standardized JSON
-argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id \"task description\""
-examples:
-  - /workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-user-auth "Implement user authentication system"
-  - /workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-payment "Refactor payment module API"
-  - /workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-bugfix "Fix login validation error"
-allowed-tools: Task(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
----
-
-# Context Gather Command (/workflow:tools:context-gather)
-
-## Overview
-
-Orchestrator command that invokes `context-search-agent` to gather comprehensive project context for implementation planning. Generates standardized `context-package.json` with codebase analysis, dependencies, and conflict detection.
-
-
-## Core Philosophy
-
-- **Agent Delegation**: Delegate all discovery to `context-search-agent` for autonomous execution
-- **Detection-First**: Check for existing context-package before executing
-- **Plan Mode**: Full comprehensive analysis (vs lightweight brainstorm mode)
-- **Standardized Output**: Generate `.workflow/active/{session}/.process/context-package.json`
-
-## Execution Process
-
-```
-Input Parsing:
-   ├─ Parse flags: --session
-   └─ Parse: task_description (required)
-
-Step 1: Context-Package Detection
-   └─ Decision (existing package):
-      ├─ Valid package exists → Return existing (skip execution)
-      └─ No valid package → Continue to Step 2
-
-Step 2: Complexity Assessment & Parallel Explore (NEW)
-   ├─ Analyze task_description → classify Low/Medium/High
-   ├─ Select exploration angles (1-4 based on complexity)
-   ├─ Launch N cli-explore-agents in parallel
-   │  └─ Each outputs: exploration-{angle}.json
-   └─ Generate explorations-manifest.json
-
-Step 3: Invoke Context-Search Agent (with exploration input)
-   ├─ Phase 1: Initialization & Pre-Analysis
-   ├─ Phase 2: Multi-Source Discovery
-   │  ├─ Track 0: Exploration Synthesis (prioritize & deduplicate)
-   │  ├─ Track 1-4: Existing tracks
-   └─ Phase 3: Synthesis & Packaging
-      └─ Generate context-package.json with exploration_results
-
-Step 4: Output Verification
-   └─ Verify context-package.json contains exploration_results
-```
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-### Step 1: Context-Package Detection
-
-**Execute First** - Check if valid package already exists:
-
-```javascript
-const contextPackagePath = `.workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json`;
-
-if (file_exists(contextPackagePath)) {
-  const existing = Read(contextPackagePath);
-
-  // Validate package belongs to current session
-  if (existing?.metadata?.session_id === session_id) {
-    console.log("✅ Valid context-package found for session:", session_id);
-    console.log("📊 Stats:", existing.statistics);
-    console.log("⚠️  Conflict Risk:", existing.conflict_detection.risk_level);
-    return existing; // Skip execution, return existing
-  } else {
-    console.warn("⚠️ Invalid session_id in existing package, re-generating...");
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Step 2: Complexity Assessment & Parallel Explore
-
-**Only execute if Step 1 finds no valid package**
-
-```javascript
-// 2.1 Complexity Assessment
-function analyzeTaskComplexity(taskDescription) {
-  const text = taskDescription.toLowerCase();
-  if (/architect|refactor|restructure|modular|cross-module/.test(text)) return 'High';
-  if (/multiple|several|integrate|migrate|extend/.test(text)) return 'Medium';
-  return 'Low';
-}
-
-const ANGLE_PRESETS = {
-  architecture: ['architecture', 'dependencies', 'modularity', 'integration-points'],
-  security: ['security', 'auth-patterns', 'dataflow', 'validation'],
-  performance: ['performance', 'bottlenecks', 'caching', 'data-access'],
-  bugfix: ['error-handling', 'dataflow', 'state-management', 'edge-cases'],
-  feature: ['patterns', 'integration-points', 'testing', 'dependencies'],
-  refactor: ['architecture', 'patterns', 'dependencies', 'testing']
-};
-
-function selectAngles(taskDescription, complexity) {
-  const text = taskDescription.toLowerCase();
-  let preset = 'feature';
-  if (/refactor|architect|restructure/.test(text)) preset = 'architecture';
-  else if (/security|auth|permission/.test(text)) preset = 'security';
-  else if (/performance|slow|optimi/.test(text)) preset = 'performance';
-  else if (/fix|bug|error|issue/.test(text)) preset = 'bugfix';
-
-  const count = complexity === 'High' ? 4 : (complexity === 'Medium' ? 3 : 1);
-  return ANGLE_PRESETS[preset].slice(0, count);
-}
-
-const complexity = analyzeTaskComplexity(task_description);
-const selectedAngles = selectAngles(task_description, complexity);
-const sessionFolder = `.workflow/active/${session_id}/.process`;
-
-// 2.2 Launch Parallel Explore Agents
-const explorationTasks = selectedAngles.map((angle, index) =>
-  Task(
-    subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
-    description=`Explore: ${angle}`,
-    prompt=`
-## Task Objective
-Execute **${angle}** exploration for task planning context. Analyze codebase from this specific angle to discover relevant structure, patterns, and constraints.
-
-## Assigned Context
-- **Exploration Angle**: ${angle}
-- **Task Description**: ${task_description}
-- **Session ID**: ${session_id}
-- **Exploration Index**: ${index + 1} of ${selectedAngles.length}
-- **Output File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
-
-## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
-**You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
-1. Run: ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}' (project structure)
-2. Run: rg -l "{keyword_from_task}" --type ts (locate relevant files)
-3. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/explore-json-schema.json (get output schema reference)
-
-## Exploration Strategy (${angle} focus)
-
-**Step 1: Structural Scan** (Bash)
-- get_modules_by_depth.sh → identify modules related to ${angle}
-- find/rg → locate files relevant to ${angle} aspect
-- Analyze imports/dependencies from ${angle} perspective
-
-**Step 2: Semantic Analysis** (Gemini CLI)
-- How does existing code handle ${angle} concerns?
-- What patterns are used for ${angle}?
-- Where would new code integrate from ${angle} viewpoint?
-
-**Step 3: Write Output**
-- Consolidate ${angle} findings into JSON
-- Identify ${angle}-specific clarification needs
-
-## Expected Output
-
-**File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
-
-**Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 3, follow schema exactly
-
-**Required Fields** (all ${angle} focused):
-- project_structure: Modules/architecture relevant to ${angle}
-- relevant_files: Files affected from ${angle} perspective
-  **IMPORTANT**: Use object format with relevance scores for synthesis:
-  \`[{path: "src/file.ts", relevance: 0.85, rationale: "Core ${angle} logic"}]\`
-  Scores: 0.7+ high priority, 0.5-0.7 medium, <0.5 low
-- patterns: ${angle}-related patterns to follow
-- dependencies: Dependencies relevant to ${angle}
-- integration_points: Where to integrate from ${angle} viewpoint (include file:line locations)
-- constraints: ${angle}-specific limitations/conventions
-- clarification_needs: ${angle}-related ambiguities (options array + recommended index)
-- _metadata.exploration_angle: "${angle}"
-
-## Success Criteria
-- [ ] Schema obtained via cat explore-json-schema.json
-- [ ] get_modules_by_depth.sh executed
-- [ ] At least 3 relevant files identified with ${angle} rationale
-- [ ] Patterns are actionable (code examples, not generic advice)
-- [ ] Integration points include file:line locations
-- [ ] Constraints are project-specific to ${angle}
-- [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
-- [ ] clarification_needs includes options + recommended
-
-## Output
-Write: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
-Return: 2-3 sentence summary of ${angle} findings
-`
-  )
-);
-
-// 2.3 Generate Manifest after all complete
-const explorationFiles = bash(`find ${sessionFolder} -name "exploration-*.json" -type f`).split('\n').filter(f => f.trim());
-const explorationManifest = {
-  session_id,
-  task_description,
-  timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
-  complexity,
-  exploration_count: selectedAngles.length,
-  angles_explored: selectedAngles,
-  explorations: explorationFiles.map(file => {
-    const data = JSON.parse(Read(file));
-    return { angle: data._metadata.exploration_angle, file: file.split('/').pop(), path: file, index: data._metadata.exploration_index };
-  })
-};
-Write(`${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`, JSON.stringify(explorationManifest, null, 2));
-```
-
-### Step 3: Invoke Context-Search Agent
-
-**Only execute after Step 2 completes**
-
-```javascript
-Task(
-  subagent_type="context-search-agent",
-  description="Gather comprehensive context for plan",
-  prompt=`
-## Execution Mode
-**PLAN MODE** (Comprehensive) - Full Phase 1-3 execution
-
-## Session Information
-- **Session ID**: ${session_id}
-- **Task Description**: ${task_description}
-- **Output Path**: .workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json
-
-## Exploration Input (from Step 2)
-- **Manifest**: ${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json
-- **Exploration Count**: ${explorationManifest.exploration_count}
-- **Angles**: ${explorationManifest.angles_explored.join(', ')}
-- **Complexity**: ${complexity}
-
-## Mission
-Execute complete context-search-agent workflow for implementation planning:
-
-### Phase 1: Initialization & Pre-Analysis
-1. **Project State Loading**: Read and parse `.workflow/project.json`. Use its `overview` section as the foundational `project_context`. This is your primary source for architecture, tech stack, and key components. If file doesn't exist, proceed with fresh analysis.
-2. **Detection**: Check for existing context-package (early exit if valid)
-3. **Foundation**: Initialize CodexLens, get project structure, load docs
-4. **Analysis**: Extract keywords, determine scope, classify complexity based on task description and project state
-
-### Phase 2: Multi-Source Context Discovery
-Execute all discovery tracks:
-- **Track 0**: Exploration Synthesis (load ${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json, prioritize critical_files, deduplicate patterns/integration_points)
-- **Track 1**: Historical archive analysis (query manifest.json for lessons learned)
-- **Track 2**: Reference documentation (CLAUDE.md, architecture docs)
-- **Track 3**: Web examples (use Exa MCP for unfamiliar tech/APIs)
-- **Track 4**: Codebase analysis (5-layer discovery: files, content, patterns, deps, config/tests)
-
-### Phase 3: Synthesis, Assessment & Packaging
-1. Apply relevance scoring and build dependency graph
-2. **Synthesize 4-source data**: Merge findings from all sources (archive > docs > code > web). **Prioritize the context from `project.json`** for architecture and tech stack unless code analysis reveals it's outdated.
-3. **Populate `project_context`**: Directly use the `overview` from `project.json` to fill the `project_context` section of the output `context-package.json`. Include description, technology_stack, architecture, and key_components.
-4. Integrate brainstorm artifacts (if .brainstorming/ exists, read content)
-5. Perform conflict detection with risk assessment
-6. **Inject historical conflicts** from archive analysis into conflict_detection
-7. Generate and validate context-package.json
-
-## Output Requirements
-Complete context-package.json with:
-- **metadata**: task_description, keywords, complexity, tech_stack, session_id
-- **project_context**: description, technology_stack, architecture, key_components (sourced from `project.json` overview)
-- **assets**: {documentation[], source_code[], config[], tests[]} with relevance scores
-- **dependencies**: {internal[], external[]} with dependency graph
-- **brainstorm_artifacts**: {guidance_specification, role_analyses[], synthesis_output} with content
-- **conflict_detection**: {risk_level, risk_factors, affected_modules[], mitigation_strategy, historical_conflicts[]}
-- **exploration_results**: {manifest_path, exploration_count, angles, explorations[], aggregated_insights} (from Track 0)
-
-## Quality Validation
-Before completion verify:
-- [ ] Valid JSON format with all required fields
-- [ ] File relevance accuracy >80%
-- [ ] Dependency graph complete (max 2 transitive levels)
-- [ ] Conflict risk level calculated correctly
-- [ ] No sensitive data exposed
-- [ ] Total files ≤50 (prioritize high-relevance)
-
-Execute autonomously following agent documentation.
-Report completion with statistics.
-`
-)
-```
-
-### Step 4: Output Verification
-
-After agent completes, verify output:
-
-```javascript
-// Verify file was created
-const outputPath = `.workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json`;
-if (!file_exists(outputPath)) {
-  throw new Error("❌ Agent failed to generate context-package.json");
-}
-
-// Verify exploration_results included
-const pkg = JSON.parse(Read(outputPath));
-if (pkg.exploration_results?.exploration_count > 0) {
-  console.log(`✅ Exploration results aggregated: ${pkg.exploration_results.exploration_count} angles`);
-}
-```
-
-## Parameter Reference
-
-| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
-|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
-| `--session` | string | ✅ | Workflow session ID (e.g., WFS-user-auth) |
-| `task_description` | string | ✅ | Detailed task description for context extraction |
-
-## Output Schema
-
-Refer to `context-search-agent.md` Phase 3.7 for complete `context-package.json` schema.
-
-**Key Sections**:
-- **metadata**: Session info, keywords, complexity, tech stack
-- **project_context**: Architecture patterns, conventions, tech stack (populated from `project.json` overview)
-- **assets**: Categorized files with relevance scores (documentation, source_code, config, tests)
-- **dependencies**: Internal and external dependency graphs
-- **brainstorm_artifacts**: Brainstorm documents with full content (if exists)
-- **conflict_detection**: Risk assessment with mitigation strategies and historical conflicts
-- **exploration_results**: Aggregated exploration insights (from parallel explore phase)
-
-## Historical Archive Analysis
-
-### Track 1: Query Archive Manifest
-
-The context-search-agent MUST perform historical archive analysis as Track 1 in Phase 2:
-
-**Step 1: Check for Archive Manifest**
-```bash
-# Check if archive manifest exists
-if [[ -f .workflow/archives/manifest.json ]]; then
-  # Manifest available for querying
-fi
-```
-
-**Step 2: Extract Task Keywords**
-```javascript
-// From current task description, extract key entities and operations
-const keywords = extractKeywords(task_description);
-// Examples: ["User", "model", "authentication", "JWT", "reporting"]
-```
-
-**Step 3: Search Archive for Relevant Sessions**
-```javascript
-// Query manifest for sessions with matching tags or descriptions
-const relevantArchives = archives.filter(archive => {
-  return archive.tags.some(tag => keywords.includes(tag)) ||
-         keywords.some(kw => archive.description.toLowerCase().includes(kw.toLowerCase()));
-});
-```
-
-**Step 4: Extract Watch Patterns**
-```javascript
-// For each relevant archive, check watch_patterns for applicability
-const historicalConflicts = [];
-
-relevantArchives.forEach(archive => {
-  archive.lessons.watch_patterns?.forEach(pattern => {
-    // Check if pattern trigger matches current task
-    if (isPatternRelevant(pattern.pattern, task_description)) {
-      historicalConflicts.push({
-        source_session: archive.session_id,
-        pattern: pattern.pattern,
-        action: pattern.action,
-        files_to_check: pattern.related_files,
-        archived_at: archive.archived_at
-      });
-    }
-  });
-});
-```
-
-**Step 5: Inject into Context Package**
-```json
-{
-  "conflict_detection": {
-    "risk_level": "medium",
-    "risk_factors": ["..."],
-    "affected_modules": ["..."],
-    "mitigation_strategy": "...",
-    "historical_conflicts": [
-      {
-        "source_session": "WFS-auth-feature",
-        "pattern": "When modifying User model",
-        "action": "Check reporting-service and auditing-service dependencies",
-        "files_to_check": ["src/models/User.ts", "src/services/reporting.ts"],
-        "archived_at": "2025-09-16T09:00:00Z"
-      }
-    ]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Risk Level Escalation
-
-If `historical_conflicts` array is not empty, minimum risk level should be "medium":
-
-```javascript
-if (historicalConflicts.length > 0 && currentRisk === "low") {
-  conflict_detection.risk_level = "medium";
-  conflict_detection.risk_factors.push(
-    `${historicalConflicts.length} historical conflict pattern(s) detected from past sessions`
-  );
-}
-```
-
-### Archive Query Algorithm
-
-```markdown
-1. IF .workflow/archives/manifest.json does NOT exist → Skip Track 1, continue to Track 2
-2. IF manifest exists:
-   a. Load manifest.json
-   b. Extract keywords from task_description (nouns, verbs, technical terms)
-   c. Filter archives where:
-      - ANY tag matches keywords (case-insensitive) OR
-      - description contains keywords (case-insensitive substring match)
-   d. For each relevant archive:
-      - Read lessons.watch_patterns array
-      - Check if pattern.pattern keywords overlap with task_description
-      - If relevant: Add to historical_conflicts array
-   e. IF historical_conflicts.length > 0:
-      - Set risk_level = max(current_risk, "medium")
-      - Add to risk_factors
-3. Continue to Track 2 (reference documentation)
-```
-
-## Notes
-
-- **Detection-first**: Always check for existing package before invoking agent
-- **Project.json integration**: Agent reads `.workflow/project.json` as primary source for project context, avoiding redundant analysis
-
-- **No redundancy**: This command is a thin orchestrator, all logic in agent
-- **Plan-specific**: Use this for implementation planning; brainstorm mode uses direct agent call