bps-kit 1.0.1 → 1.0.3

package/templates/vault/inventory-demand-planning/references/decision-frameworks.md

@@ -1,861 +0,0 @@
-# Decision Frameworks — Inventory Demand Planning
-
-This reference provides the detailed decision logic, optimization models, method selection
-trees, and segmentation methodologies for inventory demand planning at multi-location
-retailers. It is loaded on demand when the agent needs to make or recommend nuanced
-planning decisions.
-
-All thresholds, formulas, and cost assumptions reflect US multi-location retail operations
-managing hundreds of SKUs across grocery, general merchandise, seasonal, and promotional
-categories.
-
----
-
-## 1. Forecast Method Selection Trees
-
-### 1.1 Primary Selection Algorithm
-
-The goal is to match each SKU to the forecasting method that minimizes WMAPE on out-of-time
-holdout data. In practice, most organizations cannot afford per-SKU model optimization
-across hundreds of items. Instead, classify items into demand pattern archetypes and assign
-methods by archetype.
-
-#### Step 1 — Classify the Demand Pattern
-
-Compute the following statistics on the most recent 52 weeks of de-promoted demand data
-(remove promotional lift periods before computing):
-
-| Statistic | Formula | Purpose |
-|---|---|---|
-| **Coefficient of Variation (CV)** | σ_demand / μ_demand | Measures demand variability |
-| **Average Demand Interval (ADI)** | Total periods / Number of non-zero demand periods | Measures intermittency |
-| **Trend Strength** | R² of linear regression on 26-week trailing demand | Measures directional movement |
-| **Seasonal Strength** | Autocorrelation at lag 52 (weekly) or lag 12 (monthly) | Measures repeating seasonal pattern |
-| **Zero-Demand Ratio** | Count of zero-demand periods / Total periods | Measures how often demand is absent |
-
-#### Step 2 — Map to Demand Archetype
-
-| Archetype | CV | ADI | Trend R² | Seasonal AC | Zero Ratio | Example |
-|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-| **Smooth** | < 0.5 | 1.0–1.1 | < 0.3 | < 0.3 | < 5% | Milk, bread, paper towels |
-| **Trending** | < 0.7 | 1.0–1.2 | ≥ 0.3 | < 0.3 | < 10% | Growing brand, declining legacy item |
-| **Seasonal** | 0.3–1.0 | 1.0–1.3 | any | ≥ 0.3 | < 15% | Sunscreen, holiday decor, grills |
-| **Trending-Seasonal** | 0.4–1.2 | 1.0–1.3 | ≥ 0.3 | ≥ 0.3 | < 15% | Growing seasonal category |
-| **Erratic** | ≥ 0.7 | 1.0–1.5 | < 0.3 | < 0.3 | < 30% | Fashion accessories, novelty items |
-| **Intermittent** | any | ≥ 1.5 | any | any | ≥ 30% | Spare parts, specialty ingredients |
-| **Lumpy** | ≥ 1.0 | ≥ 1.5 | any | any | ≥ 30% | Bulk wholesale items with sporadic orders |
-
-#### Step 3 — Assign Forecasting Method
-
-| Archetype | Primary Method | Parameters | Fallback |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| **Smooth** | Weighted moving average (4–8 week window, recent-weighted) | Weights: 0.4/0.3/0.2/0.1 for 4-week | Single exponential smoothing (α = 0.15–0.25) |
-| **Trending** | Holt's double exponential smoothing | α = 0.2–0.4, β = 0.05–0.15 | Linear regression on trailing 26 weeks |
-| **Seasonal** | Holt-Winters (additive if stable amplitude, multiplicative if growing amplitude) | α = 0.1–0.3, β = 0.01–0.05, γ = 0.1–0.3, period = 52 weeks | STL decomposition + SES on residual |
-| **Trending-Seasonal** | Holt-Winters (multiplicative) | α = 0.2–0.4, β = 0.05–0.15, γ = 0.15–0.3 | X-13ARIMA-SEATS |
-| **Erratic** | Damped trend exponential smoothing | α = 0.2–0.4, β = 0.05, φ = 0.8–0.95 | Ensemble of 3 methods (median) |
-| **Intermittent** | Croston's method or SBA | α_demand = 0.1–0.2, α_interval = 0.1–0.2 | Bootstrap simulation (1000 draws) |
-| **Lumpy** | SBA (Syntetos-Boylan Approximation) | Same as Croston's with bias correction | Aggregated to monthly then disaggregated |
-
-### 1.2 Model Switching Rules
-
-Do not switch methods based on a single bad week. Models need time to prove or disprove themselves.
-
-| Condition | Action | Minimum Observation Period |
-|---|---|---|
-| WMAPE improves > 10% on holdout vs. current method | Switch to candidate method | 8-week parallel test |
-| Tracking signal exceeds ±4 for 2 consecutive periods | Trigger model review; re-estimate parameters first | 2 periods (weeks) |
-| Tracking signal exceeds ±6 for 1 period | Immediate model review; likely archetype change | 1 period |
-| Demand pattern archetype changes (e.g., smooth → trending) | Re-run selection algorithm from Step 1 | Quarterly archetype reassessment |
-| New product transitions from analog-based to own-history | Switch when 12+ weeks of own data available and own-data WMAPE < analog-based | 12 weeks |
-| Post-promotion baseline contamination detected | Refit baseline model excluding promo periods | Immediate |
-
-### 1.3 Parameter Optimization Protocol
-
-For exponential smoothing methods, optimize parameters using grid search on time-series
-cross-validation (rolling origin, 1-step ahead forecast, 26+ origins).
-
-**Grid search ranges:**
-
-| Parameter | Range | Step Size | Constraint |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| α (level) | 0.05–0.50 | 0.05 | — |
-| β (trend) | 0.01–0.20 | 0.01 | β ≤ α |
-| γ (seasonal) | 0.05–0.40 | 0.05 | — |
-| φ (damping) | 0.80–0.98 | 0.02 | Only for damped methods |
-
-**Optimization metric:** Minimize WMAPE on the holdout origins. If two parameter sets
-produce WMAPE within 1 percentage point, prefer the set with lower α (more smoothing)
-for stability.
-
-**Overfitting guard:** If the optimized model produces WMAPE on the holdout that is
->5 percentage points better than on the fitting data, the model is likely overfit.
-Increase smoothing (lower α) until the gap narrows to <3 points.
-
----
-
-## 2. Safety Stock Optimization Models
-
-### 2.1 Standard Safety Stock (Normal Demand, Fixed Lead Time)
-
-When demand follows a roughly normal distribution and lead time is consistent:
-
-```
-SS = Z × σ_d × √(LT)
-```
-
-Where:
-- Z = z-score for the target service level (see lookup table below)
-- σ_d = standard deviation of demand per period (use same period as LT)
-- LT = lead time in periods
-
-**Z-Score Lookup:**
-
-| Service Level | Z-Score | Typical Application |
-|---|---|---|
-| 85.0% | 1.04 | CZ items — minimal investment |
-| 90.0% | 1.28 | C-items, non-critical B-items |
-| 92.0% | 1.41 | Mid-range safety net |
-| 95.0% | 1.65 | Standard target for A/B items |
-| 97.5% | 1.96 | AX items — high value, predictable |
-| 99.0% | 2.33 | Critical items — stockout cost vastly exceeds holding |
-| 99.5% | 2.58 | Life-safety or contractual obligation items |
-| 99.9% | 3.09 | Rarely justified — extreme holding cost |
-
-### 2.2 Safety Stock with Lead Time Variability
-
-When vendor lead times are uncertain (CV of lead time > 0.15):
-
-```
-SS = Z × √(LT_avg × σ_d² + d_avg² × σ_LT²)
-```
-
-Where:
-- LT_avg = average lead time in periods
-- σ_LT = standard deviation of lead time in periods
-- d_avg = average demand per period
-
-**Practical note:** Many planners underestimate lead time variability because they
-measure "vendor ship date to DC receipt" without accounting for receiving delays,
-quality holds, or weekend/holiday dead time. Measure lead time from PO release to
-"available to sell" — this is the operationally relevant metric.
-
-### 2.3 Safety Stock with Review Period
-
-For periodic review systems (review every R periods):
-
-```
-SS = Z × σ_d × √(LT + R)
-```
-
-The review period adds exposure time — between reviews, you cannot react to demand
-changes. Weekly review (R=1) on a 2-week lead time item needs safety stock for √3 weeks.
-Monthly review (R=4) on the same item needs safety stock for √6 weeks — 41% more.
-
-### 2.4 Safety Stock for Intermittent Demand
-
-Normal-distribution formulas fail when demand has many zero periods. Use empirical
-(bootstrapped) safety stock instead:
-
-1. Collect the last 52 periods of demand data (include zeros).
-2. Generate 10,000 bootstrap samples of length (LT + R) by random sampling with
-   replacement from the historical demand.
-3. Compute the sum of each bootstrap sample (= simulated demand during lead time + review).
-4. The safety stock is the (service level)th percentile of the simulated demand totals
-   minus the mean simulated demand total.
-
-**Example:** For 95% service level, safety stock = P95 of bootstrap demand — mean of
-bootstrap demand. This captures the skewed, zero-inflated distribution that parametric
-formulas miss.
-
-### 2.5 Safety Stock for New Products (No History)
-
-When an item has < 8 weeks of own demand history:
-
-1. Identify 3–5 analogous items matching on: category, price point (±20%), brand tier
-   (national/private label), pack size, and target demographic.
-2. Compute the average σ_d and CV across the analogs.
-3. Apply a "new product uncertainty premium" of 1.25× to the analog σ_d.
-4. Use the standard formula with the inflated σ_d: `SS = Z × (1.25 × σ_d_analog) × √(LT + R)`.
-5. Every 2 weeks, blend own-history σ_d with the analog σ_d. By week 8, use 70% own history
-   and 30% analog. By week 12, use 100% own history.
-
-### 2.6 Safety Stock Cost-Optimization
-
-The naive approach is to set a service level target and compute SS. The sophisticated
-approach is to optimize the tradeoff between holding cost and stockout cost:
-
-```
-Optimal SL = 1 − (H / (H + S × D/Q))
-```
-
-Where:
-- H = holding cost per unit per period
-- S = stockout cost per unit (lost margin + customer goodwill + substitution cost)
-- D = demand per period
-- Q = order quantity
-
-For most retailers, stockout cost on A-items is 3–5× the unit margin (including lost
-customer visits and substitution effects), which pushes optimal SL to 96–98%.
-For C-items, stockout cost is approximately equal to the unit margin, yielding optimal
-SL of 88–92%.
-
----
-
-## 3. Promotional Planning Frameworks
-
-### 3.1 Promotional Lift Estimation Methodology
-
-Promotional lift is always computed relative to the baseline forecast (the forecast that
-would have been generated without the promotion). Contaminating the baseline with
-promotional history is the #1 source of systematic forecast error in retail.
-
-#### Step 1 — Establish Clean Baseline
-
-Strip promotional periods from the demand history before fitting the baseline model.
-Flag weeks as "promotional" if any of the following were active:
-- Temporary price reduction (TPR) > 5% off regular price
-- Feature in circular, digital ad, or endcap display
-- BOGO or multi-buy offer
-- Cross-promotion in another category
-
-After stripping, interpolate the gaps using the forecast model fitted to non-promotional
-periods. This creates a "what would have sold at regular price" baseline.
-
-#### Step 2 — Compute Historical Lifts
-
-For each historical promotional event on this SKU:
-
-```
-Lift Ratio = Actual Promo-Period Sales / Baseline Forecast for Promo Period
-```
-
-A lift ratio of 2.5 means the promotion drove 2.5× baseline volume (150% incremental).
-
-Organize lift ratios by promotional mechanism:
-
-| Mechanism | Typical Lift Range | Key Drivers |
-|---|---|---|
-| TPR only (5–15% off) | 1.15–1.40 | Depth of discount, category elasticity |
-| TPR (15–30% off) | 1.40–2.00 | Deeper discount creates sharper response |
-| TPR + display | 1.80–2.50 | Display location (endcap > wing > inline) |
-| TPR + circular feature | 2.00–3.00 | Circular reach and placement (front page > interior) |
-| TPR + display + circular | 2.50–4.00 | Full support — this is the "A-level" promo |
-| BOGO | 2.50–5.00 | Perceived value drives high response but heavy forward-buy |
-| Doorbuster / loss leader | 3.00–6.00+ | Traffic driver; lift varies wildly by event |
-
-#### Step 3 — Apply Lift to Current Forecast
-
-```
-Promo Forecast = Baseline Forecast × Lift Ratio
-```
-
-When multiple promotional mechanisms are combined, do NOT multiply individual lifts.
-Use the combined-mechanism lift from historical data or the table above. The interaction
-effects are sub-additive (display alone = 1.5× and circular alone = 1.8× does not mean
-display + circular = 2.7×; it's typically 2.0–2.5×).
-
-#### Step 4 — Model the Post-Promotion Dip
-
-```
-Post-Promo Demand = Baseline × (1 − Dip Factor × Decay)
-```
-
-Default dip factors by product type:
-
-| Product Type | Dip Factor (% of incremental lift) | Dip Duration | Decay Pattern |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| **Shelf-stable pantry** | 40–60% | 2–4 weeks | 60/30/10 (Week 1/2/3) |
-| **Perishable / refrigerated** | 10–20% | 0–1 week | Immediate recovery |
-| **Household consumables** | 30–50% | 2–3 weeks | 50/35/15 |
-| **Personal care** | 25–40% | 2–3 weeks | 50/30/20 |
-| **Seasonal** | 15–30% | 1–2 weeks | 70/30 |
-| **Discretionary / general merch** | 10–25% | 1–2 weeks | 70/30 |
-
-### 3.2 Cannibalization Estimation
-
-When SKU A is promoted, substitutable SKU B loses sales. The cannibalization rate is:
-
-```
-Cannibalization Rate = ΔB_down / ΔA_up
-```
-
-Where ΔA_up is the incremental lift on A and ΔB_down is the volume loss on B during
-the same period.
-
-**Default estimates when no cross-elasticity data exists:**
-
-| Substitutability | Cannibalization Rate | Example |
-|---|---|---|
-| Direct substitute (same brand, different size) | 25–40% | 12-oz promoted, 16-oz loses |
-| Close substitute (different brand, same segment) | 15–25% | National brand promoted, private label loses |
-| Moderate substitute (same category, different segment) | 5–15% | Premium promoted, value tier affected |
-| Weak substitute (adjacent category) | 0–5% | Chips promoted, crackers slightly affected |
-
-**Important:** Cannibalization is bidirectional across the category. When building the
-category-level promotional plan, sum the cannibalization effects across all substitutes
-to compute the true category-level lift (which is always less than the item-level lift).
-
-### 3.3 Forward-Buy and Pantry Loading
-
-Deep promotions cause customers to purchase ahead of their consumption schedule.
-Forward-buy volume is demand pulled from future periods, not incremental category demand.
-
-**Forward-buy estimation:**
-
-```
-Forward-Buy Volume = Incremental Lift × Forward-Buy Factor
-```
-
-| Promotional Depth | Product Shelf Life | Forward-Buy Factor |
-|---|---|---|
-| 10–20% off | < 2 weeks (perishable) | 0.05–0.10 |
-| 10–20% off | 2–12 weeks | 0.10–0.20 |
-| 10–20% off | > 12 weeks (shelf-stable) | 0.20–0.35 |
-| 20–35% off | < 2 weeks | 0.05–0.15 |
-| 20–35% off | 2–12 weeks | 0.20–0.35 |
-| 20–35% off | > 12 weeks | 0.35–0.50 |
-| 35–50% off | < 2 weeks | 0.10–0.20 |
-| 35–50% off | 2–12 weeks | 0.30–0.45 |
-| 35–50% off | > 12 weeks | 0.50–0.70 |
-| BOGO / > 50% | Any | 0.50–0.80 |
-
-The forward-buy factor tells you what fraction of the incremental lift came from
-pantry loading rather than true consumption increase. This directly feeds the
-post-promo dip calculation — the dip is approximately equal to the forward-buy volume
-spread over its consumption period.
-
-### 3.4 Promotional Calendar Planning
-
-When planning the annual promotional calendar, apply these rules:
-
-1. **Minimum inter-promotion gap:** 4 weeks between promotions on the same SKU. Shorter
-   gaps train customers to only buy on deal, eroding brand equity and baseline velocity.
-2. **Maximum promotional frequency:** 13 weeks per year (25%) for any single SKU.
-   Beyond this, the "promotional price" becomes the reference price in consumers' minds.
-3. **Seasonal alignment:** Promote seasonal items during the build phase (first 40% of
-   the season), not during peak or decline. Promoting at peak wastes money on demand
-   that would have occurred anyway. Promoting during decline is a markdown, not a promotion.
-4. **Cross-category coordination:** Avoid promoting close substitutes simultaneously.
-   Stagger promotions across substitutes by at least 2 weeks to avoid self-cannibalization.
-5. **Vendor funding alignment:** Match promotional timing to vendor trade fund availability.
-   Many CPG manufacturers operate on calendar quarters — funds not committed by quarter-end
-   expire. Plan key promos in weeks 8–12 of each quarter when vendors are motivated to
-   spend remaining funds.
-
----
-
-## 4. ABC/XYZ Segmentation Methodology
-
-### 4.1 ABC Classification (Value)
-
-ABC classification segments SKUs by their financial contribution. The classification
-drives differentiated investment in forecasting effort, safety stock, review frequency,
-and management attention.
-
-#### Classification Procedure
-
-1. **Select the value metric.** Options in order of preference:
-   - Gross margin contribution (best — focuses investment on profit, not revenue)
-   - Revenue (acceptable when margin data is unavailable)
-   - Unit volume (use only for warehouse space planning, not financial investment)
-
-2. **Compute trailing 52-week value** for each active SKU.
-
-3. **Sort descending** by the value metric.
-
-4. **Compute cumulative % of total value** and classify:
-
-| Class | Cumulative % of Value | Typical % of SKUs | Description |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| A | 0–80% | 10–20% | High-value items driving the business |
-| B | 80–95% | 20–30% | Mid-value items providing assortment breadth |
-| C | 95–100% | 50–70% | Long-tail items with minimal individual impact |
-
-5. **Exception overrides:**
-   - New items (< 13 weeks) are auto-classified one tier higher than their data suggests
-     until they have sufficient history. A new item computing as C is treated as B.
-   - Items with contractual obligations (planogram commitment, vendor agreement) are
-     classified minimum B regardless of current sales velocity.
-   - Items flagged as strategic by merchandising (e.g., traffic drivers, competitive
-     price match items) are classified minimum A.
-
-#### Reclassification Schedule
-
-Run ABC reclassification quarterly. Between quarters, items are reclassified only
-if they cross a threshold by >50% (e.g., an item must contribute >120% of the A/B
-boundary to move from B to A mid-quarter). This prevents oscillation at class boundaries.
-
-### 4.2 XYZ Classification (Predictability)
-
-XYZ classification segments SKUs by demand forecast difficulty. It drives differentiated
-forecasting method selection and safety stock strategies.
-
-#### Classification Procedure
-
-1. **Compute de-seasonalized, de-promoted demand** for each SKU over the trailing 52 weeks.
-   Remove seasonal indices and promotional lift periods so that the variability metric
-   reflects genuine demand uncertainty, not planned variation.
-
-2. **Compute the coefficient of variation (CV):**
-   ```
-   CV = σ_demand / μ_demand
-   ```
-   Use the de-seasonalized, de-promoted demand series.
-
-3. **Classify:**
-
-| Class | CV Range | Description | Forecast Difficulty |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| X | < 0.5 | Highly predictable — demand varies little around its mean | Low — simple methods work well |
-| Y | 0.5–1.0 | Moderately predictable — noticeable variability | Medium — requires good models and monitoring |
-| Z | > 1.0 | Erratic/lumpy — demand is highly variable or intermittent | High — no model will be highly accurate |
-
-4. **Supplement with ADI (Average Demand Interval):** Items with ADI > 2.0 (meaning
-   demand occurs less than every other period) should be classified Z regardless of CV,
-   because the intermittency itself creates forecast difficulty that CV alone doesn't capture.
-
-### 4.3 Combined ABC/XYZ Policy Matrix
-
-| Segment | Forecast Method | Safety Stock | Review Frequency | Replenishment | Management Attention |
-|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-| **AX** | Exponential smoothing (automated) | Z = 1.96 (97.5%) | Weekly | Automated with exception alerts | Monthly review |
-| **AY** | Holt-Winters or causal model | Z = 1.65 (95%) | Weekly | Automated with planner review | Bi-weekly review |
-| **AZ** | Ensemble or manual override | Z = 1.41–1.65 (92–95%) | Weekly | Planner-managed; never fully automated | Weekly review |
-| **BX** | Moving average (automated) | Z = 1.65 (95%) | Bi-weekly | Automated | Monthly review |
-| **BY** | Exponential smoothing (automated) | Z = 1.65 (95%) | Bi-weekly | Automated with exception alerts | Monthly review |
-| **BZ** | Croston's or damped trend | Z = 1.28 (90%) | Bi-weekly | Semi-automated with planner approval | Monthly review |
-| **CX** | Simple moving average | Z = 1.28 (90%) | Monthly | Automated | Quarterly review |
-| **CY** | Simple moving average | Z = 1.28 (90%) | Monthly | Automated | Quarterly review |
-| **CZ** | Croston's or none | Z = 1.04 (85%) | Monthly | Manual or min/max | Quarterly — discontinuation candidate |
-
-### 4.4 Migration Tracking
-
-Track SKU movement between segments quarterly. Key migration patterns to monitor:
-
-| Migration | Signal | Action |
-|---|---|---|
-| A → B | Revenue or margin declining | Investigate: is this category shrinkage, competitive loss, or assortment issue? |
-| B → A | Revenue or margin growing | Upgrade forecasting method and review frequency. Validate safety stock. |
-| X → Y or Z | Demand becoming less predictable | Check for demand pattern regime change. Review forecast model fit. Increase safety stock. |
-| Z → X or Y | Demand stabilizing | Possible to simplify forecast model. Review safety stock for reduction. |
-| Any → CZ | Low value + erratic | Strong discontinuation candidate. Run slow-mover kill decision. |
-
----
-
-## 5. Vendor Management Decision Logic
-
-### 5.1 Vendor Tier Classification
-
-Classify vendors into tiers based on annual purchase volume, strategic importance,
-and supply risk profile:
-
-| Tier | Criteria | Count (typical) | Review Cadence |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| **Strategic** | Top 5 by spend, or sole-source for A-items | 3–8 | Monthly scorecards, quarterly business reviews |
-| **Preferred** | Top 20 by spend, multiple A/B items | 10–25 | Quarterly scorecards |
-| **Approved** | All remaining active vendors | 30–100+ | Annual review |
-| **Probationary** | Vendors under corrective action | Variable | Weekly monitoring, monthly review |
-
-### 5.2 Vendor Scorecard Metrics
-
-Score each vendor quarterly on a 0–100 scale across these dimensions:
-
-| Dimension | Weight | Metric | Target | Calculation |
-|---|---|---|---|---|
-| **On-time delivery** | 30% | % of POs delivered within the agreed window (±1 day) | > 95% | Score = (Actual % / 95%) × 100, cap at 100 |
-| **Fill rate** | 25% | % of ordered units actually shipped | > 97% | Score = (Actual % / 97%) × 100, cap at 100 |
-| **Lead time consistency** | 20% | CV of actual lead time vs. stated lead time | CV < 0.15 | Score = max(0, 100 − (CV − 0.15) × 500) |
-| **Quality** | 15% | % of received units passing QC inspection | > 99% | Score = (Actual % / 99%) × 100, cap at 100 |
-| **Responsiveness** | 10% | Average response time to inquiries/issues (hours) | < 24 hours | Score = max(0, 100 − (Avg Hours − 24) × 2) |
-
-**Composite score thresholds:**
-
-| Score Range | Rating | Action |
-|---|---|---|
-| 90–100 | Excellent | Consider for volume increase, preferred terms |
-| 75–89 | Good | Standard operations, no action needed |
-| 60–74 | Needs Improvement | Issue corrective action request; 90-day improvement plan |
-| < 60 | Unacceptable | Immediate escalation; begin qualifying alternative suppliers |
-
-### 5.3 Vendor Lead Time Management
-
-Lead time management is the demand planner's most underleveraged tool for reducing
-inventory investment. A 1-day reduction in lead time across all vendors can reduce
-aggregate safety stock by 5–8%.
-
-**Lead time decomposition:**
-
-| Component | Typical Range | Planner Influence |
-|---|---|---|
-| Order processing at vendor | 1–3 days | Low — vendor's internal process |
-| Production/picking | 2–10 days | Medium — negotiate priority tiers |
-| Vendor ship preparation | 1–2 days | Low |
-| Transit time | 1–14 days | Medium — carrier selection, mode choice |
-| Receiving and put-away | 1–3 days | High — internal process improvement |
-| Quality hold (if applicable) | 0–5 days | High — streamline QC process |
-
-**Actions to reduce lead time:**
-
-1. For strategic vendors: negotiate VMI (vendor-managed inventory) where the vendor
-   monitors your inventory and ships proactively. Eliminates order processing delay.
-2. For all vendors: provide rolling 8-week forecasts to allow pre-positioning. Reduces
-   production/picking time on non-stock items.
-3. Internally: invest in receiving automation (ASN-enabled receiving, barcode scanning)
-   to cut receiving from 2–3 days to same-day.
-4. Negotiate consolidated weekly shipments vs. per-PO shipments to reduce transit
-   frequency while maintaining fill rate.
-
-### 5.4 MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity) Negotiation Framework
-
-When a vendor's MOQ creates excess inventory, evaluate these options in order:
-
-| Option | When to Use | Expected Outcome |
-|---|---|---|
-| **Negotiate lower MOQ** | Annual spend > $50K with this vendor; you have leverage | MOQ reduced 20–40% |
-| **Consolidate with other SKUs** | Multiple SKUs from same vendor; dollar minimum instead of unit minimum | Meet dollar MOQ without over-ordering individual SKUs |
-| **Accept higher price for lower MOQ** | MOQ overage cost > price premium cost | Pay 3–8% more per unit but order only what you need |
-| **Negotiate consignment** | Slow-moving items from strategic vendors | Vendor owns inventory until you sell it |
-| **Split orders with another buyer** | Known network of retailers ordering from the same vendor | Share the MOQ and split the shipment |
-| **Accept the overage** | Holding cost for the excess is < $500 and item is non-perishable | Order the MOQ and treat the overage as forward inventory |
-
-### 5.5 Vendor Negotiation for Lead Time Reduction
-
-**Preparation checklist before negotiating:**
-
-1. Document your current order volume and growth trajectory with this vendor.
-2. Compute the cost of their current lead time to your business: excess safety stock
-   carrying cost + stockout cost from lead time variability.
-3. Identify what you can offer in return: longer-term commitments, higher volumes,
-   fewer order frequency changes, rolling forecasts.
-4. Know your BATNA (best alternative): have a qualified secondary supplier identified.
-
-**Negotiation structure:**
-
-1. Present the data: "Over the past 6 months, your average lead time has been X days
-   with a standard deviation of Y. This variability costs us $Z annually in excess
-   safety stock."
-2. Propose the target: "We're requesting a committed lead time of X−2 days with a
-   guarantee of CV < 0.15."
-3. Offer the exchange: "In return, we can commit to rolling 8-week forecasts updated
-   weekly, and we'll consolidate to 2 orders per week instead of daily."
-4. Set the timeline: "Let's implement this for Q2 and review the scorecard at the
-   end of Q2 QBR."
-
----
-
-## 6. Seasonal Buy and Markdown Timing Models
-
-### 6.1 Seasonal Buy Planning
-
-Seasonal categories require forward commitments because lead times exceed the selling
-season. The buy decision has two components: the initial buy (pre-season) and the
-in-season reorder (if the vendor supports it).
-
-#### Initial Buy Calculation
-
-```
-Initial Buy = Season Forecast × Initial Commitment % − Carry-Over Inventory
-```
-
-| Category Risk Profile | Initial Commitment % | Reserve for Reorder | Rationale |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| Low risk (staple seasonal, proven seller) | 70–80% | 20–30% | High confidence in forecast; reorder available |
-| Medium risk (trend-influenced, moderate history) | 55–65% | 35–45% | Hedge against forecast error |
-| High risk (fashion, new trend, first season) | 40–50% | 50–60% | Maximize flexibility; accept possible stockout |
-| One-time buy (import, long lead, no reorder) | 100% | 0% | No reorder option; commit fully but forecast conservatively |
-
-#### In-Season Reorder Triggers
-
-Monitor sell-through rate weekly starting from week 2 of the season:
-
-```
-Sell-Through Rate = Units Sold / (Units Sold + Units On-Hand + Units On-Order)
-```
-
-| Weeks into Season | Sell-Through vs. Plan | Action |
-|---|---|---|
-| Weeks 1–2 | > 120% of plan | Issue reorder immediately for 50% of reserve allocation |
-| Weeks 1–2 | 80–120% of plan | Hold; too early to confirm trend |
-| Weeks 3–4 | > 110% of plan | Issue reorder for remaining reserve |
-| Weeks 3–4 | 90–110% of plan | Issue conservative reorder (25% of reserve) |
-| Weeks 3–4 | 70–89% of plan | Hold all reserve; prepare markdown contingency |
-| Weeks 3–4 | < 70% of plan | Cancel any open reorders; initiate early markdown |
-| Weeks 5+ | Any pace | Reorders unlikely to arrive in time; manage with markdowns |
-
-### 6.2 Markdown Timing and Depth Model
-
-The markdown decision balances margin recovery against sell-through velocity. Every
-week of delay costs margin because holding costs accrue and the remaining selling
-window shrinks.
-
-#### Markdown Decision Matrix
-
-| Weeks Remaining in Season | Weeks of Supply at Current Rate | Recommended Action |
-|---|---|---|
-| > 6 weeks | < 3 | No markdown; possible reorder |
-| > 6 weeks | 3–6 | Hold price; monitor weekly |
-| > 6 weeks | 7–10 | First markdown: 20–25% off |
-| > 6 weeks | > 10 | Aggressive markdown: 30–40% off |
-| 4–6 weeks | < 3 | No markdown needed |
-| 4–6 weeks | 3–6 | Consider 15–20% markdown |
-| 4–6 weeks | 6–10 | Markdown 25–35% |
-| 4–6 weeks | > 10 | Markdown 40–50%; explore liquidation |
-| 2–4 weeks | < 3 | No markdown |
-| 2–4 weeks | 3–6 | Markdown 30–40% |
-| 2–4 weeks | > 6 | Markdown 50–60%; liquidation channels |
-| < 2 weeks | Any remaining | Final clearance 60–75% off or liquidation |
-
-#### Markdown Velocity Curve
-
-After applying a markdown, monitor the velocity response:
-
-| Markdown Depth | Expected Velocity Increase | If Not Achieved Within 1 Week |
-|---|---|---|
-| 20% off | 1.5–2.0× | Deepen to 30% |
-| 30% off | 2.0–3.0× | Deepen to 40% |
-| 40% off | 3.0–4.0× | Deepen to 50% or explore liquidation |
-| 50% off | 4.0–6.0× | If still not moving, this is dead stock — liquidate |
-
-### 6.3 Season-End Liquidation Decision
-
-When the selling season is ending and inventory remains:
-
-```
-Liquidation Net Recovery = (Liquidation Price × Remaining Units) − Logistics Cost
-Hold-to-Next-Season Net = (Expected Sell Price × Sell-Through Estimate) 
-                          − Holding Cost − Obsolescence Risk
-```
-
-**Liquidation is preferred when:**
-- Hold-to-next-season sell-through estimate < 60% (style risk, trend change)
-- Holding cost for 9–12 months > 15% of original cost (typical for most retailers)
-- Warehouse space is constrained and the space has higher-value alternative use
-- The product is trend/fashion and will be visually dated next season
-
-**Holding is preferred when:**
-- Product is a classic/carryover style with minimal fashion risk
-- Hold-to-next-season sell-through estimate > 80%
-- Warehouse space is available at low marginal cost
-- Liquidation offers are below variable cost (you'd lose money selling)
-
----
-
-## 7. New Product Introduction Forecasting
-
-### 7.1 Analogous Item Selection
-
-The quality of a new product forecast depends almost entirely on the quality of the
-analogous items selected. Bad analogs produce bad forecasts regardless of the method.
-
-#### Selection Criteria (rank by importance)
-
-| Criterion | Weight | How to Match |
-|---|---|---|
-| **Category/subcategory** | 25% | Must be same subcategory (e.g., "premium yogurt" not just "dairy") |
-| **Price point** | 20% | Within ±20% of the new item's retail price |
-| **Brand tier** | 15% | National brand → national brand analog; private label → private label |
-| **Pack size / format** | 15% | Similar unit count, size, or weight |
-| **Target demographic** | 10% | Same customer segment (value, mainstream, premium) |
-| **Launch season** | 10% | Same quarter launch; seasonal patterns differ by quarter |
-| **Distribution breadth** | 5% | Similar initial door count (±25%) |
-
-#### Analog Scoring
-
-Score each candidate analog on the criteria above (1–5 scale per criterion, weighted).
-Select the top 3–5 analogs with composite scores > 3.5. If no analogs score > 3.0, the
-new product is truly novel — use category average with a 40% confidence band.
-
-### 7.2 New Product Lifecycle Curve
-
-Most new products follow a lifecycle curve with four phases:
-
-| Phase | Duration | Demand Pattern | Description |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| **Introduction** | Weeks 1–4 | Ramp-up, often trial-driven | Initial customer trial. Demand is unpredictable. |
-| **Growth** | Weeks 5–12 | Accelerating, repeat purchases begin | Repeat buyers emerge. Demand becomes more predictable. |
-| **Stabilization** | Weeks 13–26 | Plateaus to steady state | Item finds its "run rate." Baseline forecast is reliable. |
-| **Maturity** | Weeks 27+ | Stable or slowly declining | Standard demand planning applies. |
-
-**Forecast by phase:**
-
-| Phase | Method | Confidence Band |
-|---|---|---|
-| Introduction (1–4 weeks) | Analog average × 1.1 (trial bump) | ±40–50% |
-| Growth (5–12 weeks) | Blend: 40% analog + 60% own trajectory | ±25–35% |
-| Stabilization (13–26 weeks) | 80% own history, 20% analog | ±15–25% |
-| Maturity (27+ weeks) | Standard method selection per demand pattern | Standard WMAPE target |
-
-### 7.3 New Product Safety Stock Protocol
-
-| Weeks of History | Safety Stock Approach | Uncertainty Premium |
-|---|---|---|
-| 0–4 | Analog σ_d with 30% premium | 1.30× |
-| 5–8 | Blended σ_d (50% own + 50% analog) with 20% premium | 1.20× |
-| 9–12 | Blended σ_d (75% own + 25% analog) with 10% premium | 1.10× |
-| 13+ | Own σ_d, standard formula | 1.00× |
-
-### 7.4 New Product Kill Decision
-
-Not every new product succeeds. The kill decision should be structured, not emotional:
-
-| Metric | Kill Threshold | Timeframe |
-|---|---|---|
-| Sell-through vs. analog-based plan | < 30% of plan | After 6 weeks |
-| Repeat purchase rate (if measurable) | < 10% of trial purchasers | After 8 weeks |
-| Velocity trend | Declining for 4 consecutive weeks after introduction | After 6 weeks |
-| Category manager assessment | "Would not re-buy" | After 8 weeks |
-
-When a kill decision is made:
-1. Cancel all open POs immediately.
-2. Halt any planned promotions.
-3. Mark down remaining inventory at 30% off for 3 weeks, then 50% for 2 weeks.
-4. Liquidate any remainder after 5 weeks.
-5. Document the post-mortem: why did the analog-based forecast fail? Was it the
-   analogs, the product, the pricing, or the competitive context?
-
----
-
-## 8. Demand Sensing and Exception Management
-
-### 8.1 Real-Time Demand Signal Monitoring
-
-In addition to periodic forecast reviews, monitor for demand signals that require
-immediate attention between forecast cycles:
-
-| Signal | Detection Method | Threshold | Action |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| **POS velocity spike** | Daily POS > 3× trailing 4-week daily average | 3× for 2+ consecutive days | Investigate cause; manual override if sustained |
-| **POS velocity drop** | Daily POS < 0.3× trailing 4-week daily average | 0.3× for 3+ consecutive days | Check for phantom inventory, display removal, or competitive action |
-| **Stockout cascade** | 3+ locations out of stock on same SKU within 48 hours | 3 locations | Emergency replenishment from DC; allocate by sales velocity |
-| **Weather alert** | NWS severe weather warning for region covering > 10% of stores | Forecast impact > 5% of category volume | Adjust forecasts for weather-sensitive categories |
-| **Competitive price move** | Competitor price check shows > 15% lower on comparable SKU | Confirmed at 3+ competitor locations | Alert merchandising; prepare forecast downward revision |
-| **Social media spike** | Monitoring tool shows > 500% increase in brand/product mentions | Sustained > 24 hours | Assess virality risk; prepare allocation plan |
-
-### 8.2 Forecast Override Governance
-
-Manual overrides are necessary but dangerous. Ungoverned overrides introduce bias and
-degrade forecast accuracy over time.
-
-**Override rules:**
-
-1. **All overrides must be documented** with a reason code and quantitative justification.
-2. **Override authority by magnitude:**
-   - ±10%: Planner can override without approval
-   - ±10–25%: Requires planning manager approval
-   - ±25–50%: Requires director approval
-   - > ±50%: Requires VP approval (or planning committee)
-3. **Override accuracy tracking:** Every override is tracked against actuals. If a planner's
-   overrides have a WMAPE > 40% over a quarter, their override authority is reviewed.
-4. **Sunset rule:** Overrides expire after 4 weeks. If the condition persists, a new
-   override (with fresh justification) must be created. This prevents stale overrides
-   from contaminating forecasts months later.
-5. **No "consensus" overrides:** Overrides from demand review meetings where forecasts
-   are adjusted to match sales team wishful thinking are the #1 source of positive bias.
-   Require every meeting override to cite a specific, verifiable external signal.
-
----
-
-## 9. Inventory Health Diagnostics
-
-### 9.1 Weeks of Supply Analysis
-
-Weeks of supply (WOS) is the primary pulse-check metric for inventory health. Compute
-at the SKU level, aggregate to category, and review weekly.
-
-```
-WOS = On-Hand Inventory (units) / Average Weekly Demand (units)
-```
-
-Use the forward-looking forecast for the denominator, not trailing sales. Trailing sales
-understates demand when items have been out of stock (you can't sell what you don't have).
-
-**WOS Health Bands:**
-
-| WOS Range | Status | Action |
-|---|---|---|
-| < 2 weeks | Critical low | Expedite replenishment; consider reallocation from low-velocity locations |
-| 2–3 weeks | Low | Verify next PO arrival; place emergency order if no PO in transit |
-| 4–8 weeks | Healthy | Standard operations |
-| 9–12 weeks | Elevated | Review forecast; defer or reduce next PO if demand hasn't increased |
-| 13–26 weeks | Excess | Initiate markdown or promotional sell-through plan |
-| > 26 weeks | Critical excess | Flag for slow-mover kill decision; markdown or liquidate |
-
-### 9.2 Inventory Turns and GMROI
-
-**Inventory Turns:**
-```
-Annual Turns = Annual COGS / Average Inventory at Cost
-```
-
-| Category Type | Target Turns | Benchmark |
-|---|---|---|
-| Perishable grocery | 30–52 | 1× per week |
-| Center-store grocery | 12–20 | Every 2–4 weeks |
-| General merchandise | 6–12 | Every 4–8 weeks |
-| Seasonal (in-season) | 8–15 | Sell through in-season |
-| Seasonal (annual) | 2–4 | Lower because of off-season zero sales |
-
-**GMROI (Gross Margin Return on Inventory Investment):**
-```
-GMROI = Gross Margin $ / Average Inventory at Cost
-```
-
-A GMROI of 2.0 means you earn $2 in gross margin for every $1 invested in inventory.
-Minimum acceptable GMROI varies by category but should generally exceed the company's
-cost of capital divided by the gross margin percentage. For a retailer with 8% cost of
-capital and 35% gross margin, minimum GMROI = 0.08 / 0.35 = 0.23. In practice, most
-retailers target GMROI > 1.5 for healthy categories.
-
-### 9.3 Dead Stock and Obsolescence Identification
-
-Dead stock is inventory with zero sales for a defined period. It is the most expensive
-form of excess inventory because it generates zero return while consuming warehouse space
-and working capital.
-
-**Dead stock tiers:**
-
-| Tier | Definition | Action | Timeline |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| Aging | Zero sales for 8–12 weeks | Review — is this seasonal? New? Misplaced? | Investigate within 1 week |
-| Dead | Zero sales for 13–26 weeks | Markdown 40–50% or move to clearance | Initiate within 2 weeks |
-| Obsolete | Zero sales for > 26 weeks | Liquidate at any positive recovery or donate | Execute within 4 weeks |
-| Write-off | Liquidation/donation uneconomical | Destroy and write off; recover warehouse space | Execute within 2 weeks |
-
-**Root cause analysis for dead stock:**
-
-Run quarterly. Categorize dead stock by root cause to prevent recurrence:
-
-| Root Cause | % of Dead Stock (typical) | Prevention |
-|---|---|---|
-| Over-buying (forecast too high) | 35–45% | Improve forecast accuracy; tighten override governance |
-| Product failure (quality, customer rejection) | 15–20% | Faster new product kill decisions |
-| Seasonal carryover (missed markdown window) | 15–25% | Enforce markdown timing model from §6.2 |
-| Assortment change (delisted but not sold through) | 10–15% | Coordinate delist timing with sell-through |
-| Phantom inventory (system says it exists but doesn't) | 5–10% | Regular cycle counts on zero-velocity items |
-
-### 9.4 Allocation Logic for Multi-Location Retailers
-
-When DC inventory is insufficient to fill all store-level demand, allocate using a
-priority framework rather than pro-rata distribution:
-
-**Priority 1: Prevent store stockout on A-items.**
-Allocate first to stores with < 3 days of supply on A-items. Quantity = minimum of
-(days-to-next-DC-shipment × daily demand) to bridge until the next allocation cycle.
-
-**Priority 2: Match allocation to store-level forecast.**
-For remaining inventory, allocate proportional to each store's forward weekly forecast
-(not historical sales, which penalizes stores that have been out of stock).
-
-**Priority 3: Minimum presentation stock.**
-Every store receives at least the minimum display quantity regardless of forecast. An
-empty shelf signals "this item is discontinued" to the customer and destroys demand.
-
-**Priority 4: Cap allocation to shelf capacity.**
-Do not send more than a store can merchandise. Excess units in the backroom create
-shrinkage, damage, and out-of-date risk (for perishables).
-
-**Allocation frequency:**
-- A-items: allocate with every DC-to-store shipment (typically 2–5× per week)
-- B-items: allocate 1–2× per week
-- C-items: allocate weekly or bi-weekly