bobo-ai-cli 3.0.4 → 3.0.5

package/knowledge/skills/csharp-lsp.md

@@ -1,40 +1,40 @@
----
-id: "csharp-lsp"
-title: "csharp-lsp"
-category: "other"
-tags: ["csharp-lsp", "supported extensions", "installation", "requirements", "more information"]
-triggers: []
-dependencies: []
-source: "E:/Bobo's Coding cache/.claude/skills/csharp-lsp"
----
-
-# csharp-lsp
-
-C# language server for Claude Code, providing code intelligence and diagnostics.
-
-## Supported Extensions
-
-`.cs`
-
-## Installation
-
-### Via .NET tool (recommended)
-
-```bash
-dotnet tool install --global csharp-ls
-```
-
-### Via Homebrew (macOS)
-
-```bash
-brew install csharp-ls
-```
-
-## Requirements
-
-- .NET SDK 6.0 or later
-
-## More Information
-
-- [csharp-ls GitHub](https://github.com/razzmatazz/csharp-language-server)
-- [.NET SDK Download](https://dotnet.microsoft.com/download)
+---
+id: "csharp-lsp"
+title: "csharp-lsp"
+category: "other"
+tags: ["csharp-lsp", "supported extensions", "installation", "requirements", "more information"]
+triggers: []
+dependencies: []
+source: "E:/Bobo's Coding cache/.claude/skills/csharp-lsp"
+---
+
+# csharp-lsp
+
+C# language server for Claude Code, providing code intelligence and diagnostics.
+
+## Supported Extensions
+
+`.cs`
+
+## Installation
+
+### Via .NET tool (recommended)
+
+```bash
+dotnet tool install --global csharp-ls
+```
+
+### Via Homebrew (macOS)
+
+```bash
+brew install csharp-ls
+```
+
+## Requirements
+
+- .NET SDK 6.0 or later
+
+## More Information
+
+- [csharp-ls GitHub](https://github.com/razzmatazz/csharp-language-server)
+- [.NET SDK Download](https://dotnet.microsoft.com/download)

package/knowledge/skills/decision-making-framework.md

@@ -1,154 +1,154 @@
----
-id: "decision-making-framework"
-title: "Decision Making Framework"
-category: "agent-engineering"
-tags: ["decision making framework", "decision modes", "decision triggers", "high-agency behaviors", "structured decision template", "anti-patterns (avoid)", "integration with work mode"]
-triggers: []
-dependencies: []
-source: "E:/Bobo's Coding cache/.claude/skills/decision-making-framework"
----
-
----
-name: decision-making-framework
-description: Unified decision framework - combines high-agency (autonomous decisions) + structured-decision-alignment (systematic decision-making). Use when facing complex choices, architectural decisions, or conflicting requirements.
----
-
-# Decision Making Framework
-
-> **Merged from**: high-agency + structured-decision-alignment
-> **Core principle**: Decide fast, decide well, decide once
-
-## Decision Modes
-
-### Mode 1: Autonomous (95% of decisions)
-
-For decisions where the codebase, conventions, or best practices provide clear guidance:
-
-```
-1. Check existing patterns in codebase
-2. Apply the most common convention
-3. Execute without asking
-4. Document the choice in commit message
-```
-
-**Examples**: File naming, code style, dependency versions, UI details, test strategy
-
-### Mode 2: Structured (4% of decisions)
-
-For decisions with multiple valid approaches:
-
-```
-1. State the decision clearly
-2. List top 2-3 options with trade-offs
-3. Apply scoring matrix
-4. Choose highest-scoring option
-5. Document reasoning
-```
-
-**Scoring Matrix**:
-| Criterion | Weight |
-|-----------|--------|
-| Maintains existing patterns | 3x |
-| Simpler implementation | 2x |
-| Better performance | 2x |
-| Easier to test | 1x |
-| More flexible | 1x |
-
-### Mode 3: Blocking (1% of decisions)
-
-Only 4 situations require user input:
-1. **Missing credentials** — API keys, passwords, private keys
-2. **Opposing approaches** — REST vs GraphQL, SQL vs NoSQL
-3. **Contradictory requirements** — "Fast but perfect"
-4. **Irreversible risk** — Delete production data, force push
-
----
-
-## Decision Triggers
-
-| Signal | Mode | Action |
-|--------|------|--------|
-| Codebase has existing pattern | Autonomous | Follow it |
-| Best practice is clear | Autonomous | Apply it |
-| Language convention exists | Autonomous | Use it |
-| 2+ equally valid approaches | Structured | Score and choose |
-| Requirements contradict | Blocking | Ask user |
-| Risk is irreversible | Blocking | Confirm with user |
-
----
-
-## High-Agency Behaviors
-
-### Do Immediately (No Permission Needed)
-- Create files following project conventions
-- Install needed dependencies
-- Run tests to verify changes
-- Fix obvious bugs encountered
-- Refactor to follow existing patterns
-
-### Do After Documenting Intent
-- Architecture changes (document in commit)
-- New feature additions (document in plan)
-- Performance optimizations (document why)
-
-### Never Do Without Explicit Permission
-- Delete production data
-- Force push to shared branches
-- Modify CI/CD pipelines
-- Send messages to external services
-- Upload sensitive content
-
----
-
-## Structured Decision Template
-
-When facing a non-trivial decision:
-
-```markdown
-## Decision: [What needs to be decided]
-
-### Context
-[Why this decision is needed]
-
-### Options Considered
-1. **Option A**: [Description]
-   - Pros: [...]
-   - Cons: [...]
-   - Score: [X/10]
-
-2. **Option B**: [Description]
-   - Pros: [...]
-   - Cons: [...]
-   - Score: [X/10]
-
-### Decision
-**Chosen**: Option [X]
-**Reason**: [Why]
-**Trade-off**: [What we give up]
-```
-
----
-
-## Anti-Patterns (Avoid)
-
-1. **Analysis Paralysis** — Spending more time deciding than doing
-2. **Premature Abstraction** — Designing for hypothetical futures
-3. **Bikeshedding** — Debating trivial details
-4. **Decision Reversal** — Reopening closed decisions without new information
-
----
-
-## Integration with Work Mode
-
-```
-Receive task
-  ↓
-Quick plan → TodoList
-  ↓
-For each step:
-  ├─ Can decide autonomously? → Execute
-  ├─ Need structured analysis? → Score and choose
-  └─ Hit blocking condition? → Ask user (4 types only)
-  ↓
-Complete and verify
-```
+---
+id: "decision-making-framework"
+title: "Decision Making Framework"
+category: "agent-engineering"
+tags: ["decision making framework", "decision modes", "decision triggers", "high-agency behaviors", "structured decision template", "anti-patterns (avoid)", "integration with work mode"]
+triggers: []
+dependencies: []
+source: "E:/Bobo's Coding cache/.claude/skills/decision-making-framework"
+---
+
+---
+name: decision-making-framework
+description: Unified decision framework - combines high-agency (autonomous decisions) + structured-decision-alignment (systematic decision-making). Use when facing complex choices, architectural decisions, or conflicting requirements.
+---
+
+# Decision Making Framework
+
+> **Merged from**: high-agency + structured-decision-alignment
+> **Core principle**: Decide fast, decide well, decide once
+
+## Decision Modes
+
+### Mode 1: Autonomous (95% of decisions)
+
+For decisions where the codebase, conventions, or best practices provide clear guidance:
+
+```
+1. Check existing patterns in codebase
+2. Apply the most common convention
+3. Execute without asking
+4. Document the choice in commit message
+```
+
+**Examples**: File naming, code style, dependency versions, UI details, test strategy
+
+### Mode 2: Structured (4% of decisions)
+
+For decisions with multiple valid approaches:
+
+```
+1. State the decision clearly
+2. List top 2-3 options with trade-offs
+3. Apply scoring matrix
+4. Choose highest-scoring option
+5. Document reasoning
+```
+
+**Scoring Matrix**:
+| Criterion | Weight |
+|-----------|--------|
+| Maintains existing patterns | 3x |
+| Simpler implementation | 2x |
+| Better performance | 2x |
+| Easier to test | 1x |
+| More flexible | 1x |
+
+### Mode 3: Blocking (1% of decisions)
+
+Only 4 situations require user input:
+1. **Missing credentials** — API keys, passwords, private keys
+2. **Opposing approaches** — REST vs GraphQL, SQL vs NoSQL
+3. **Contradictory requirements** — "Fast but perfect"
+4. **Irreversible risk** — Delete production data, force push
+
+---
+
+## Decision Triggers
+
+| Signal | Mode | Action |
+|--------|------|--------|
+| Codebase has existing pattern | Autonomous | Follow it |
+| Best practice is clear | Autonomous | Apply it |
+| Language convention exists | Autonomous | Use it |
+| 2+ equally valid approaches | Structured | Score and choose |
+| Requirements contradict | Blocking | Ask user |
+| Risk is irreversible | Blocking | Confirm with user |
+
+---
+
+## High-Agency Behaviors
+
+### Do Immediately (No Permission Needed)
+- Create files following project conventions
+- Install needed dependencies
+- Run tests to verify changes
+- Fix obvious bugs encountered
+- Refactor to follow existing patterns
+
+### Do After Documenting Intent
+- Architecture changes (document in commit)
+- New feature additions (document in plan)
+- Performance optimizations (document why)
+
+### Never Do Without Explicit Permission
+- Delete production data
+- Force push to shared branches
+- Modify CI/CD pipelines
+- Send messages to external services
+- Upload sensitive content
+
+---
+
+## Structured Decision Template
+
+When facing a non-trivial decision:
+
+```markdown
+## Decision: [What needs to be decided]
+
+### Context
+[Why this decision is needed]
+
+### Options Considered
+1. **Option A**: [Description]
+   - Pros: [...]
+   - Cons: [...]
+   - Score: [X/10]
+
+2. **Option B**: [Description]
+   - Pros: [...]
+   - Cons: [...]
+   - Score: [X/10]
+
+### Decision
+**Chosen**: Option [X]
+**Reason**: [Why]
+**Trade-off**: [What we give up]
+```
+
+---
+
+## Anti-Patterns (Avoid)
+
+1. **Analysis Paralysis** — Spending more time deciding than doing
+2. **Premature Abstraction** — Designing for hypothetical futures
+3. **Bikeshedding** — Debating trivial details
+4. **Decision Reversal** — Reopening closed decisions without new information
+
+---
+
+## Integration with Work Mode
+
+```
+Receive task
+  ↓
+Quick plan → TodoList
+  ↓
+For each step:
+  ├─ Can decide autonomously? → Execute
+  ├─ Need structured analysis? → Score and choose
+  └─ Hit blocking condition? → Ask user (4 types only)
+  ↓
+Complete and verify
+```