bmad-studio 0.1.0 → 1.0.0

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md

@@ -1,232 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-v-13-report-complete'
-description: 'Validation Report Complete - Finalize report, summarize findings, present to user, offer next steps'
-
-# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
-validationReportPath: '{validation_report_path}'
-prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
----
-
-# Step 13: Validation Report Complete
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-Finalize validation report, summarize all findings from steps 1-12, present summary to user conversationally, and offer actionable next steps.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist
-- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
-- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
-- ✅ You bring synthesis and summary expertise
-- ✅ This is the FINAL step - requires user interaction
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus ONLY on summarizing findings and presenting options
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to perform additional validation
-- 💬 Approach: Conversational summary with clear next steps
-- 🚪 This is the final step - no next step after this
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Load complete validation report
-- 🎯 Summarize all findings from steps 1-12
-- 🎯 Update report frontmatter with final status
-- 💬 Present summary to user conversationally
-- 💬 Offer menu options for next actions
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user selection
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Available context: Complete validation report with findings from all validation steps
-- Focus: Summary and presentation only (no new validation)
-- Limits: Don't add new findings, just synthesize existing
-- Dependencies: Steps 1-12 completed - all validation checks done
-
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
-
-### 1. Load Complete Validation Report
-
-Read the entire validation report from {validationReportPath}
-
-Extract all findings from:
-- Format Detection (Step 2)
-- Parity Analysis (Step 2B, if applicable)
-- Information Density (Step 3)
-- Product Brief Coverage (Step 4)
-- Measurability (Step 5)
-- Traceability (Step 6)
-- Implementation Leakage (Step 7)
-- Domain Compliance (Step 8)
-- Project-Type Compliance (Step 9)
-- SMART Requirements (Step 10)
-- Holistic Quality (Step 11)
-- Completeness (Step 12)
-
-### 2. Update Report Frontmatter with Final Status
-
-Update validation report frontmatter:
-
-```yaml
----
-validationTarget: '{prd_path}'
-validationDate: '{current_date}'
-inputDocuments: [list of documents]
-validationStepsCompleted: ['step-v-01-discovery', 'step-v-02-format-detection', 'step-v-03-density-validation', 'step-v-04-brief-coverage-validation', 'step-v-05-measurability-validation', 'step-v-06-traceability-validation', 'step-v-07-implementation-leakage-validation', 'step-v-08-domain-compliance-validation', 'step-v-09-project-type-validation', 'step-v-10-smart-validation', 'step-v-11-holistic-quality-validation', 'step-v-12-completeness-validation']
-validationStatus: COMPLETE
-holisticQualityRating: '{rating from step 11}'
-overallStatus: '{Pass/Warning/Critical based on all findings}'
----
-```
-
-### 3. Create Summary of Findings
-
-**Overall Status:**
-- Determine from all validation findings
-- **Pass:** All critical checks pass, minor warnings acceptable
-- **Warning:** Some issues found but PRD is usable
-- **Critical:** Major issues that prevent PRD from being fit for purpose
-
-**Quick Results Table:**
-- Format: [classification]
-- Information Density: [severity]
-- Measurability: [severity]
-- Traceability: [severity]
-- Implementation Leakage: [severity]
-- Domain Compliance: [status]
-- Project-Type Compliance: [compliance score]
-- SMART Quality: [percentage]
-- Holistic Quality: [rating/5]
-- Completeness: [percentage]
-
-**Critical Issues:** List from all validation steps
-**Warnings:** List from all validation steps
-**Strengths:** List positives from all validation steps
-
-**Holistic Quality Rating:** From step 11
-**Top 3 Improvements:** From step 11
-
-**Recommendation:** Based on overall status
-
-### 4. Present Summary to User Conversationally
-
-Display:
-
-"**✓ PRD Validation Complete**
-
-**Overall Status:** {Pass/Warning/Critical}
-
-**Quick Results:**
-{Present quick results table with key findings}
-
-**Critical Issues:** {count or "None"}
-{If any, list briefly}
-
-**Warnings:** {count or "None"}
-{If any, list briefly}
-
-**Strengths:**
-{List key strengths}
-
-**Holistic Quality:** {rating}/5 - {label}
-
-**Top 3 Improvements:**
-1. {Improvement 1}
-2. {Improvement 2}
-3. {Improvement 3}
-
-**Recommendation:**
-{Based on overall status:
-- Pass: "PRD is in good shape. Address minor improvements to make it great."
-- Warning: "PRD is usable but has issues that should be addressed. Review warnings and improve where needed."
-- Critical: "PRD has significant issues that should be fixed before use. Focus on critical issues above."}
-
-**What would you like to do next?**"
-
-### 5. Present MENU OPTIONS
-
-Display:
-
-**[R] Review Detailed Findings** - Walk through validation report section by section
-**[E] Use Edit Workflow** - Use validation report with Edit workflow for systematic improvements
-**[F] Fix Simpler Items** - Immediate fixes for simple issues (anti-patterns, leakage, missing headers)
-**[X] Exit** - Exit and Suggest Next Steps.
-
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
-- Only proceed based on user selection
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- **IF R (Review Detailed Findings):**
-  - Walk through validation report section by section
-  - Present findings from each validation step
-  - Allow user to ask questions
-  - After review, return to menu
-
-- **IF E (Use Edit Workflow):**
-  - Explain: "The Edit workflow (steps-e/) can use this validation report to systematically address issues. Edit mode will guide you through discovering what to edit, reviewing the PRD, and applying targeted improvements."
-  - Offer: "Would you like to launch Edit mode now? It will help you fix validation findings systematically."
-  - If yes: Read fully and follow: `./steps-e/step-e-01-discovery.md`
-  - If no: Return to menu
-
-- **IF F (Fix Simpler Items):**
-  - Offer immediate fixes for:
-    - Template variables (fill in with appropriate content)
-    - Conversational filler (remove wordy phrases)
-    - Implementation leakage (remove technology names from FRs/NFRs)
-    - Missing section headers (add ## headers)
-  - Ask: "Which simple fixes would you like me to make?"
-  - If user specifies fixes, make them and update validation report
-  - Return to menu
-
-- **IF X (Exit):**
-  - Display: "**Validation Report Saved:** {validationReportPath}"
-  - Display: "**Summary:** {overall status} - {recommendation}"
-  - PRD Validation complete. Invoke the `bmad-help` skill.
-
-- **IF Any other:** Help user, then redisplay menu
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- Complete validation report loaded successfully
-- All findings from steps 1-12 summarized
-- Report frontmatter updated with final status
-- Overall status determined correctly (Pass/Warning/Critical)
-- Quick results table presented
-- Critical issues, warnings, and strengths listed
-- Holistic quality rating included
-- Top 3 improvements presented
-- Clear recommendation provided
-- Menu options presented with clear explanations
-- User can review findings, get help, or exit
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Not loading complete validation report
-- Missing summary of findings
-- Not updating report frontmatter
-- Not determining overall status
-- Missing menu options
-- Unclear next steps
-
-**Master Rule:** User needs clear summary and actionable next steps. Edit workflow is best for complex issues; immediate fixes available for simpler ones.

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/workflow-validate-prd.md

@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
----
-name: validate-prd
-description: 'Validate a PRD against standards. Use when the user says "validate this PRD" or "run PRD validation"'
-standalone: false
-main_config: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml'
-validateWorkflow: './steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md'
----
-
-# PRD Validate Workflow
-
-**Goal:** Validate existing PRDs against BMAD standards through comprehensive review.
-
-**Your Role:** Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist.
-
-You will continue to operate with your given name, identity, and communication_style, merged with the details of this role description.
-
-## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
-
-This uses **step-file architecture** for disciplined execution:
-
-### Core Principles
-
-- **Micro-file Design**: Each step is a self contained instruction file that is a part of an overall workflow that must be followed exactly
-- **Just-In-Time Loading**: Only the current step file is in memory - never load future step files until told to do so
-- **Sequential Enforcement**: Sequence within the step files must be completed in order, no skipping or optimization allowed
-- **State Tracking**: Document progress in output file frontmatter using `stepsCompleted` array when a workflow produces a document
-- **Append-Only Building**: Build documents by appending content as directed to the output file
-
-### Step Processing Rules
-
-1. **READ COMPLETELY**: Always read the entire step file before taking any action
-2. **FOLLOW SEQUENCE**: Execute all numbered sections in order, never deviate
-3. **WAIT FOR INPUT**: If a menu is presented, halt and wait for user selection
-4. **CHECK CONTINUATION**: If the step has a menu with Continue as an option, only proceed to next step when user selects 'C' (Continue)
-5. **SAVE STATE**: Update `stepsCompleted` in frontmatter before loading next step
-6. **LOAD NEXT**: When directed, read fully and follow the next step file
-
-### Critical Rules (NO EXCEPTIONS)
-
-- 🛑 **NEVER** load multiple step files simultaneously
-- 📖 **ALWAYS** read entire step file before execution
-- 🚫 **NEVER** skip steps or optimize the sequence
-- 💾 **ALWAYS** update frontmatter of output files when writing the final output for a specific step
-- 🎯 **ALWAYS** follow the exact instructions in the step file
-- ⏸️ **ALWAYS** halt at menus and wait for user input
-- 📋 **NEVER** create mental todo lists from future steps
-
-## INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE
-
-### 1. Configuration Loading
-
-Load and read full config from {main_config} and resolve:
-
-- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `planning_artifacts`, `user_name`
-- `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `user_skill_level`
-- `date` as system-generated current datetime
-
-✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the configured `{communication_language}`.
-✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`.
-
-### 2. Route to Validate Workflow
-
-"**Validate Mode: Validating an existing PRD against BMAD standards.**"
-
-Then read fully and follow: `{validateWorkflow}` (steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md)

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/bmad-check-implementation-readiness/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
----
-name: bmad-check-implementation-readiness
-description: 'Validate PRD, UX, Architecture and Epics specs are complete. Use when the user says "check implementation readiness".'
----
-
-Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/bmad-check-implementation-readiness/bmad-skill-manifest.yaml

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-type: skill

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/bmad-check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-01-document-discovery.md

@@ -1,179 +0,0 @@
----
-outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/implementation-readiness-report-{{date}}.md'
----
-
-# Step 1: Document Discovery
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-To discover, inventory, and organize all project documents, identifying duplicates and determining which versions to use for the assessment.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are an expert Product Manager and Scrum Master
-- ✅ Your focus is on finding organizing and documenting what exists
-- ✅ You identify ambiguities and ask for clarification
-- ✅ Success is measured in clear file inventory and conflict resolution
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus ONLY on finding and organizing files
-- 🚫 Don't read or analyze file contents
-- 💬 Identify duplicate documents clearly
-- 🚪 Get user confirmation on file selections
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Search for all document types systematically
-- 💾 Group sharded files together
-- 📖 Flag duplicates for user resolution
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed with unresolved duplicates
-
-## DOCUMENT DISCOVERY PROCESS:
-
-### 1. Initialize Document Discovery
-
-"Beginning **Document Discovery** to inventory all project files.
-
-I will:
-
-1. Search for all required documents (PRD, Architecture, Epics, UX)
-2. Group sharded documents together
-3. Identify any duplicates (whole + sharded versions)
-4. Present findings for your confirmation"
-
-### 2. Document Search Patterns
-
-Search for each document type using these patterns:
-
-#### A. PRD Documents
-
-- Whole: `{planning_artifacts}/*prd*.md`
-- Sharded: `{planning_artifacts}/*prd*/index.md` and related files
-
-#### B. Architecture Documents
-
-- Whole: `{planning_artifacts}/*architecture*.md`
-- Sharded: `{planning_artifacts}/*architecture*/index.md` and related files
-
-#### C. Epics & Stories Documents
-
-- Whole: `{planning_artifacts}/*epic*.md`
-- Sharded: `{planning_artifacts}/*epic*/index.md` and related files
-
-#### D. UX Design Documents
-
-- Whole: `{planning_artifacts}/*ux*.md`
-- Sharded: `{planning_artifacts}/*ux*/index.md` and related files
-
-### 3. Organize Findings
-
-For each document type found:
-
-```
-## [Document Type] Files Found
-
-**Whole Documents:**
-- [filename.md] ([size], [modified date])
-
-**Sharded Documents:**
-- Folder: [foldername]/
-  - index.md
-  - [other files in folder]
-```
-
-### 4. Identify Critical Issues
-
-#### Duplicates (CRITICAL)
-
-If both whole and sharded versions exist:
-
-```
-⚠️ CRITICAL ISSUE: Duplicate document formats found
-- PRD exists as both whole.md AND prd/ folder
-- YOU MUST choose which version to use
-- Remove or rename the other version to avoid confusion
-```
-
-#### Missing Documents (WARNING)
-
-If required documents not found:
-
-```
-⚠️ WARNING: Required document not found
-- Architecture document not found
-- Will impact assessment completeness
-```
-
-### 5. Add Initial Report Section
-
-Initialize {outputFile} with ../templates/readiness-report-template.md.
-
-### 6. Present Findings and Get Confirmation
-
-Display findings and ask:
-"**Document Discovery Complete**
-
-[Show organized file list]
-
-**Issues Found:**
-
-- [List any duplicates requiring resolution]
-- [List any missing documents]
-
-**Required Actions:**
-
-- If duplicates exist: Please remove/rename one version
-- Confirm which documents to use for assessment
-
-**Ready to proceed?** [C] Continue after resolving issues"
-
-### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS
-
-Display: **Select an Option:** [C] Continue to File Validation
-
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
-- ONLY proceed with 'C' selection
-- If duplicates identified, insist on resolution first
-- User can clarify file locations or request additional searches
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF C: Save document inventory to {outputFile}, update frontmatter with completed step and files being included, and then read fully and follow: ./step-02-prd-analysis.md
-- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then redisplay menu
-
-## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
-
-ONLY WHEN C is selected and document inventory is saved will you load ./step-02-prd-analysis.md to begin file validation.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- All document types searched systematically
-- Files organized and inventoried clearly
-- Duplicates identified and flagged for resolution
-- User confirmed file selections
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Not searching all document types
-- Ignoring duplicate document conflicts
-- Proceeding without resolving critical issues
-- Not saving document inventory
-
-**Master Rule:** Clear file identification is essential for accurate assessment.

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/bmad-check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-02-prd-analysis.md

@@ -1,168 +0,0 @@
----
-outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/implementation-readiness-report-{{date}}.md'
-epicsFile: '{planning_artifacts}/*epic*.md' # Will be resolved to actual file
----
-
-# Step 2: PRD Analysis
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-To fully read and analyze the PRD document (whole or sharded) to extract all Functional Requirements (FRs) and Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs) for validation against epics coverage.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are an expert Product Manager and Scrum Master
-- ✅ Your expertise is in requirements analysis and traceability
-- ✅ You think critically about requirement completeness
-- ✅ Success is measured in thorough requirement extraction
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus ONLY on reading and extracting from PRD
-- 🚫 Don't validate files (done in step 1)
-- 💬 Read PRD completely - whole or all sharded files
-- 🚪 Extract every FR and NFR with numbering
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Load and completely read the PRD
-- 💾 Extract all requirements systematically
-- 📖 Document findings in the report
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip or summarize PRD content
-
-## PRD ANALYSIS PROCESS:
-
-### 1. Initialize PRD Analysis
-
-"Beginning **PRD Analysis** to extract all requirements.
-
-I will:
-
-1. Load the PRD document (whole or sharded)
-2. Read it completely and thoroughly
-3. Extract ALL Functional Requirements (FRs)
-4. Extract ALL Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs)
-5. Document findings for coverage validation"
-
-### 2. Load and Read PRD
-
-From the document inventory in step 1:
-
-- If whole PRD file exists: Load and read it completely
-- If sharded PRD exists: Load and read ALL files in the PRD folder
-- Ensure complete coverage - no files skipped
-
-### 3. Extract Functional Requirements (FRs)
-
-Search for and extract:
-
-- Numbered FRs (FR1, FR2, FR3, etc.)
-- Requirements labeled "Functional Requirement"
-- User stories or use cases that represent functional needs
-- Business rules that must be implemented
-
-Format findings as:
-
-```
-## Functional Requirements Extracted
-
-FR1: [Complete requirement text]
-FR2: [Complete requirement text]
-FR3: [Complete requirement text]
-...
-Total FRs: [count]
-```
-
-### 4. Extract Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs)
-
-Search for and extract:
-
-- Performance requirements (response times, throughput)
-- Security requirements (authentication, encryption, etc.)
-- Usability requirements (accessibility, ease of use)
-- Reliability requirements (uptime, error rates)
-- Scalability requirements (concurrent users, data growth)
-- Compliance requirements (standards, regulations)
-
-Format findings as:
-
-```
-## Non-Functional Requirements Extracted
-
-NFR1: [Performance requirement]
-NFR2: [Security requirement]
-NFR3: [Usability requirement]
-...
-Total NFRs: [count]
-```
-
-### 5. Document Additional Requirements
-
-Look for:
-
-- Constraints or assumptions
-- Technical requirements not labeled as FR/NFR
-- Business constraints
-- Integration requirements
-
-### 6. Add to Assessment Report
-
-Append to {outputFile}:
-
-```markdown
-## PRD Analysis
-
-### Functional Requirements
-
-[Complete FR list from section 3]
-
-### Non-Functional Requirements
-
-[Complete NFR list from section 4]
-
-### Additional Requirements
-
-[Any other requirements or constraints found]
-
-### PRD Completeness Assessment
-
-[Initial assessment of PRD completeness and clarity]
-```
-
-### 7. Auto-Proceed to Next Step
-
-After PRD analysis complete, immediately load next step for epic coverage validation.
-
-## PROCEEDING TO EPIC COVERAGE VALIDATION
-
-PRD analysis complete. Read fully and follow: `./step-03-epic-coverage-validation.md`
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- PRD loaded and read completely
-- All FRs extracted with full text
-- All NFRs identified and documented
-- Findings added to assessment report
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Not reading complete PRD (especially sharded versions)
-- Missing requirements in extraction
-- Summarizing instead of extracting full text
-- Not documenting findings in report
-
-**Master Rule:** Complete requirement extraction is essential for traceability validation.