bmad-studio 0.1.0 → 0.2.0

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/bmad-validate-prd/data/prd-purpose.md

@@ -1,197 +0,0 @@
-# BMAD PRD Purpose
-
-**The PRD is the top of the required funnel that feeds all subsequent product development work in rhw BMad Method.**
-
----
-
-## What is a BMAD PRD?
-
-A dual-audience document serving:
-1. **Human Product Managers and builders** - Vision, strategy, stakeholder communication
-2. **LLM Downstream Consumption** - UX Design → Architecture → Epics → Development AI Agents
-
-Each successive document becomes more AI-tailored and granular.
-
----
-
-## Core Philosophy: Information Density
-
-**High Signal-to-Noise Ratio**
-
-Every sentence must carry information weight. LLMs consume precise, dense content efficiently.
-
-**Anti-Patterns (Eliminate These):**
-- ❌ "The system will allow users to..." → ✅ "Users can..."
-- ❌ "It is important to note that..." → ✅ State the fact directly
-- ❌ "In order to..." → ✅ "To..."
-- ❌ Conversational filler and padding → ✅ Direct, concise statements
-
-**Goal:** Maximum information per word. Zero fluff.
-
----
-
-## The Traceability Chain
-
-**PRD starts the chain:**
-```
-Vision → Success Criteria → User Journeys → Functional Requirements → (future: User Stories)
-```
-
-**In the PRD, establish:**
-- Vision → Success Criteria alignment
-- Success Criteria → User Journey coverage
-- User Journey → Functional Requirement mapping
-- All requirements traceable to user needs
-
-**Why:** Each downstream artifact (UX, Architecture, Epics, Stories) must trace back to documented user needs and business objectives. This chain ensures we build the right thing.
-
----
-
-## What Makes Great Functional Requirements?
-
-### FRs are Capabilities, Not Implementation
-
-**Good FR:** "Users can reset their password via email link"
-**Bad FR:** "System sends JWT via email and validates with database" (implementation leakage)
-
-**Good FR:** "Dashboard loads in under 2 seconds for 95th percentile"
-**Bad FR:** "Fast loading time" (subjective, unmeasurable)
-
-### SMART Quality Criteria
-
-**Specific:** Clear, precisely defined capability
-**Measurable:** Quantifiable with test criteria
-**Attainable:** Realistic within constraints
-**Relevant:** Aligns with business objectives
-**Traceable:** Links to source (executive summary or user journey)
-
-### FR Anti-Patterns
-
-**Subjective Adjectives:**
-- ❌ "easy to use", "intuitive", "user-friendly", "fast", "responsive"
-- ✅ Use metrics: "completes task in under 3 clicks", "loads in under 2 seconds"
-
-**Implementation Leakage:**
-- ❌ Technology names, specific libraries, implementation details
-- ✅ Focus on capability and measurable outcomes
-
-**Vague Quantifiers:**
-- ❌ "multiple users", "several options", "various formats"
-- ✅ "up to 100 concurrent users", "3-5 options", "PDF, DOCX, TXT formats"
-
-**Missing Test Criteria:**
-- ❌ "The system shall provide notifications"
-- ✅ "The system shall send email notifications within 30 seconds of trigger event"
-
----
-
-## What Makes Great Non-Functional Requirements?
-
-### NFRs Must Be Measurable
-
-**Template:**
-```
-"The system shall [metric] [condition] [measurement method]"
-```
-
-**Examples:**
-- ✅ "The system shall respond to API requests in under 200ms for 95th percentile as measured by APM monitoring"
-- ✅ "The system shall maintain 99.9% uptime during business hours as measured by cloud provider SLA"
-- ✅ "The system shall support 10,000 concurrent users as measured by load testing"
-
-### NFR Anti-Patterns
-
-**Unmeasurable Claims:**
-- ❌ "The system shall be scalable" → ✅ "The system shall handle 10x load growth through horizontal scaling"
-- ❌ "High availability required" → ✅ "99.9% uptime as measured by cloud provider SLA"
-
-**Missing Context:**
-- ❌ "Response time under 1 second" → ✅ "API response time under 1 second for 95th percentile under normal load"
-
----
-
-## Domain-Specific Requirements
-
-**Auto-Detect and Enforce Based on Project Context**
-
-Certain industries have mandatory requirements that must be present:
-
-- **Healthcare:** HIPAA Privacy & Security Rules, PHI encryption, audit logging, MFA
-- **Fintech:** PCI-DSS Level 1, AML/KYC compliance, SOX controls, financial audit trails
-- **GovTech:** NIST framework, Section 508 accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA), FedRAMP, data residency
-- **E-Commerce:** PCI-DSS for payments, inventory accuracy, tax calculation by jurisdiction
-
-**Why:** Missing these requirements in the PRD means they'll be missed in architecture and implementation, creating expensive rework. During PRD creation there is a step to cover this - during validation we want to make sure it was covered. For this purpose steps will utilize a domain-complexity.csv and project-types.csv.
-
----
-
-## Document Structure (Markdown, Human-Readable)
-
-### Required Sections
-1. **Executive Summary** - Vision, differentiator, target users
-2. **Success Criteria** - Measurable outcomes (SMART)
-3. **Product Scope** - MVP, Growth, Vision phases
-4. **User Journeys** - Comprehensive coverage
-5. **Domain Requirements** - Industry-specific compliance (if applicable)
-6. **Innovation Analysis** - Competitive differentiation (if applicable)
-7. **Project-Type Requirements** - Platform-specific needs
-8. **Functional Requirements** - Capability contract (FRs)
-9. **Non-Functional Requirements** - Quality attributes (NFRs)
-
-### Formatting for Dual Consumption
-
-**For Humans:**
-- Clear, professional language
-- Logical flow from vision to requirements
-- Easy for stakeholders to review and approve
-
-**For LLMs:**
-- ## Level 2 headers for all main sections (enables extraction)
-- Consistent structure and patterns
-- Precise, testable language
-- High information density
-
----
-
-## Downstream Impact
-
-**How the PRD Feeds Next Artifacts:**
-
-**UX Design:**
-- User journeys → interaction flows
-- FRs → design requirements
-- Success criteria → UX metrics
-
-**Architecture:**
-- FRs → system capabilities
-- NFRs → architecture decisions
-- Domain requirements → compliance architecture
-- Project-type requirements → platform choices
-
-**Epics & Stories (created after architecture):**
-- FRs → user stories (1 FR could map to 1-3 stories potentially)
-- Acceptance criteria → story acceptance tests
-- Priority → sprint sequencing
-- Traceability → stories map back to vision
-
-**Development AI Agents:**
-- Precise requirements → implementation clarity
-- Test criteria → automated test generation
-- Domain requirements → compliance enforcement
-- Measurable NFRs → performance targets
-
----
-
-## Summary: What Makes a Great BMAD PRD?
-
-✅ **High Information Density** - Every sentence carries weight, zero fluff
-✅ **Measurable Requirements** - All FRs and NFRs are testable with specific criteria
-✅ **Clear Traceability** - Each requirement links to user need and business objective
-✅ **Domain Awareness** - Industry-specific requirements auto-detected and included
-✅ **Zero Anti-Patterns** - No subjective adjectives, implementation leakage, or vague quantifiers
-✅ **Dual Audience Optimized** - Human-readable AND LLM-consumable
-✅ **Markdown Format** - Professional, clean, accessible to all stakeholders
-
----
-
-**Remember:** The PRD is the foundation. Quality here ripples through every subsequent phase. A dense, precise, well-traced PRD makes UX design, architecture, epic breakdown, and AI development dramatically more effective.

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/bmad-validate-prd/data/project-types.csv

@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-project_type,detection_signals,key_questions,required_sections,skip_sections,web_search_triggers,innovation_signals
-api_backend,"API,REST,GraphQL,backend,service,endpoints","Endpoints needed?;Authentication method?;Data formats?;Rate limits?;Versioning?;SDK needed?","endpoint_specs;auth_model;data_schemas;error_codes;rate_limits;api_docs","ux_ui;visual_design;user_journeys","framework best practices;OpenAPI standards","API composition;New protocol"
-mobile_app,"iOS,Android,app,mobile,iPhone,iPad","Native or cross-platform?;Offline needed?;Push notifications?;Device features?;Store compliance?","platform_reqs;device_permissions;offline_mode;push_strategy;store_compliance","desktop_features;cli_commands","app store guidelines;platform requirements","Gesture innovation;AR/VR features"
-saas_b2b,"SaaS,B2B,platform,dashboard,teams,enterprise","Multi-tenant?;Permission model?;Subscription tiers?;Integrations?;Compliance?","tenant_model;rbac_matrix;subscription_tiers;integration_list;compliance_reqs","cli_interface;mobile_first","compliance requirements;integration guides","Workflow automation;AI agents"
-developer_tool,"SDK,library,package,npm,pip,framework","Language support?;Package managers?;IDE integration?;Documentation?;Examples?","language_matrix;installation_methods;api_surface;code_examples;migration_guide","visual_design;store_compliance","package manager best practices;API design patterns","New paradigm;DSL creation"
-cli_tool,"CLI,command,terminal,bash,script","Interactive or scriptable?;Output formats?;Config method?;Shell completion?","command_structure;output_formats;config_schema;scripting_support","visual_design;ux_principles;touch_interactions","CLI design patterns;shell integration","Natural language CLI;AI commands"
-web_app,"website,webapp,browser,SPA,PWA","SPA or MPA?;Browser support?;SEO needed?;Real-time?;Accessibility?","browser_matrix;responsive_design;performance_targets;seo_strategy;accessibility_level","native_features;cli_commands","web standards;WCAG guidelines","New interaction;WebAssembly use"
-game,"game,player,gameplay,level,character","REDIRECT TO USE THE BMad Method Game Module Agent and Workflows - HALT","game-brief;GDD","most_sections","game design patterns","Novel mechanics;Genre mixing"
-desktop_app,"desktop,Windows,Mac,Linux,native","Cross-platform?;Auto-update?;System integration?;Offline?","platform_support;system_integration;update_strategy;offline_capabilities","web_seo;mobile_features","desktop guidelines;platform requirements","Desktop AI;System automation"
-iot_embedded,"IoT,embedded,device,sensor,hardware","Hardware specs?;Connectivity?;Power constraints?;Security?;OTA updates?","hardware_reqs;connectivity_protocol;power_profile;security_model;update_mechanism","visual_ui;browser_support","IoT standards;protocol specs","Edge AI;New sensors"
-blockchain_web3,"blockchain,crypto,DeFi,NFT,smart contract","Chain selection?;Wallet integration?;Gas optimization?;Security audit?","chain_specs;wallet_support;smart_contracts;security_audit;gas_optimization","traditional_auth;centralized_db","blockchain standards;security patterns","Novel tokenomics;DAO structure"

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/bmad-validate-prd/steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md

@@ -1,221 +0,0 @@
----
-# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
-nextStepFile: './step-v-02-format-detection.md'
-prdPurpose: '../data/prd-purpose.md'
----
-
-# Step 1: Document Discovery & Confirmation
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-Handle fresh context validation by confirming PRD path, discovering and loading input documents from frontmatter, and initializing the validation report.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist
-- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
-- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
-- ✅ You bring systematic validation expertise and analytical rigor
-- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and specific PRD context
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus ONLY on discovering PRD and input documents, not validating yet
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to perform any validation checks in this step
-- 💬 Approach: Systematic discovery with clear reporting to user
-- 🚪 This is the setup step - get everything ready for validation
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Discover and confirm PRD to validate
-- 💾 Load PRD and all input documents from frontmatter
-- 📖 Initialize validation report next to PRD
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until user confirms setup
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Available context: PRD path (user-specified or discovered), workflow configuration
-- Focus: Document discovery and setup only
-- Limits: Don't perform validation, don't skip discovery
-- Dependencies: Configuration loaded from PRD workflow.md initialization
-
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
-
-### 1. Load PRD Purpose and Standards
-
-Load and read the complete file at:
-`{prdPurpose}`
-
-This file contains the BMAD PRD philosophy, standards, and validation criteria that will guide all validation checks. Internalize this understanding - it defines what makes a great BMAD PRD.
-
-### 2. Discover PRD to Validate
-
-**If PRD path provided as invocation parameter:**
-- Use provided path
-
-**If no PRD path provided, auto-discover:**
-- Search `{planning_artifacts}` for files matching `*prd*.md`
-- Also check for sharded PRDs: `{planning_artifacts}/*prd*/*.md`
-
-**If exactly ONE PRD found:**
-- Use it automatically
-- Inform user: "Found PRD: {discovered_path} — using it for validation."
-
-**If MULTIPLE PRDs found:**
-- List all discovered PRDs with numbered options
-- "I found multiple PRDs. Which one would you like to validate?"
-- Wait for user selection
-
-**If NO PRDs found:**
-- "I couldn't find any PRD files in {planning_artifacts}. Please provide the path to the PRD file you want to validate."
-- Wait for user to provide PRD path.
-
-### 3. Validate PRD Exists and Load
-
-Once PRD path is provided:
-
-- Check if PRD file exists at specified path
-- If not found: "I cannot find a PRD at that path. Please check the path and try again."
-- If found: Load the complete PRD file including frontmatter
-
-### 4. Extract Frontmatter and Input Documents
-
-From the loaded PRD frontmatter, extract:
-
-- `inputDocuments: []` array (if present)
-- Any other relevant metadata (classification, date, etc.)
-
-**If no inputDocuments array exists:**
-Note this and proceed with PRD-only validation
-
-### 5. Load Input Documents
-
-For each document listed in `inputDocuments`:
-
-- Attempt to load the document
-- Track successfully loaded documents
-- Note any documents that fail to load
-
-**Build list of loaded input documents:**
-- Product Brief (if present)
-- Research documents (if present)
-- Other reference materials (if present)
-
-### 6. Ask About Additional Reference Documents
-
-"**I've loaded the following documents from your PRD frontmatter:**
-
-{list loaded documents with file names}
-
-**Are there any additional reference documents you'd like me to include in this validation?**
-
-These could include:
-- Additional research or context documents
-- Project documentation not tracked in frontmatter
-- Standards or compliance documents
-- Competitive analysis or benchmarks
-
-Please provide paths to any additional documents, or type 'none' to proceed."
-
-**Load any additional documents provided by user.**
-
-### 7. Initialize Validation Report
-
-Create validation report at: `{validationReportPath}`
-
-**Initialize with frontmatter:**
-```yaml
----
-validationTarget: '{prd_path}'
-validationDate: '{current_date}'
-inputDocuments: [list of all loaded documents]
-validationStepsCompleted: []
-validationStatus: IN_PROGRESS
----
-```
-
-**Initial content:**
-```markdown
-# PRD Validation Report
-
-**PRD Being Validated:** {prd_path}
-**Validation Date:** {current_date}
-
-## Input Documents
-
-{list all documents loaded for validation}
-
-## Validation Findings
-
-[Findings will be appended as validation progresses]
-```
-
-### 8. Present Discovery Summary
-
-"**Setup Complete!**
-
-**PRD to Validate:** {prd_path}
-
-**Input Documents Loaded:**
-- PRD: {prd_name} ✓
-- Product Brief: {count} {if count > 0}✓{else}(none found){/if}
-- Research: {count} {if count > 0}✓{else}(none found){/if}
-- Additional References: {count} {if count > 0}✓{else}(none){/if}
-
-**Validation Report:** {validationReportPath}
-
-**Ready to begin validation.**"
-
-### 9. Present MENU OPTIONS
-
-Display: **Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue to Format Detection
-
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
-- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
-- User can ask questions or add more documents - always respond and redisplay menu
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF A: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill, and when finished redisplay the menu
-- IF P: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill, and when finished redisplay the menu
-- IF C: Read fully and follow: {nextStepFile} to begin format detection
-- IF user provides additional document: Load it, update report, redisplay summary
-- IF Any other: help user, then redisplay menu
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- PRD path discovered and confirmed
-- PRD file exists and loads successfully
-- All input documents from frontmatter loaded
-- Additional reference documents (if any) loaded
-- Validation report initialized next to PRD
-- User clearly informed of setup status
-- Menu presented and user input handled correctly
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Proceeding with non-existent PRD file
-- Not loading input documents from frontmatter
-- Creating validation report in wrong location
-- Proceeding without user confirming setup
-- Not handling missing input documents gracefully
-
-**Master Rule:** Complete discovery and setup BEFORE validation. This step ensures everything is in place for systematic validation checks.

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/bmad-validate-prd/steps-v/step-v-02-format-detection.md

@@ -1,188 +0,0 @@
----
-# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
-nextStepFile: './step-v-03-density-validation.md'
-altStepFile: './step-v-02b-parity-check.md'
-prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
-validationReportPath: '{validation_report_path}'
----
-
-# Step 2: Format Detection & Structure Analysis
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-Detect if PRD follows BMAD format and route appropriately - classify as BMAD Standard / BMAD Variant / Non-Standard, with optional parity check for non-standard formats.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist
-- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
-- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
-- ✅ You bring systematic validation expertise and pattern recognition
-- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and PRD context
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus ONLY on detecting format and classifying structure
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to perform other validation checks in this step
-- 💬 Approach: Analytical and systematic, clear reporting of findings
-- 🚪 This is a branch step - may route to parity check for non-standard PRDs
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Analyze PRD structure systematically
-- 💾 Append format findings to validation report
-- 📖 Route appropriately based on format classification
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip format detection or proceed without classification
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Available context: PRD file loaded in step 1, validation report initialized
-- Focus: Format detection and classification only
-- Limits: Don't perform other validation, don't skip classification
-- Dependencies: Step 1 completed - PRD loaded and report initialized
-
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
-
-### 1. Extract PRD Structure
-
-Load the complete PRD file and extract:
-
-**All Level 2 (##) headers:**
-- Scan through entire PRD document
-- Extract all ## section headers
-- List them in order
-
-**PRD frontmatter:**
-- Extract classification.domain if present
-- Extract classification.projectType if present
-- Note any other relevant metadata
-
-### 2. Check for BMAD PRD Core Sections
-
-Check if the PRD contains the following BMAD PRD core sections:
-
-1. **Executive Summary** (or variations: ## Executive Summary, ## Overview, ## Introduction)
-2. **Success Criteria** (or: ## Success Criteria, ## Goals, ## Objectives)
-3. **Product Scope** (or: ## Product Scope, ## Scope, ## In Scope, ## Out of Scope)
-4. **User Journeys** (or: ## User Journeys, ## User Stories, ## User Flows)
-5. **Functional Requirements** (or: ## Functional Requirements, ## Features, ## Capabilities)
-6. **Non-Functional Requirements** (or: ## Non-Functional Requirements, ## NFRs, ## Quality Attributes)
-
-**Count matches:**
-- How many of these 6 core sections are present?
-- Which specific sections are present?
-- Which are missing?
-
-### 3. Classify PRD Format
-
-Based on core section count, classify:
-
-**BMAD Standard:**
-- 5-6 core sections present
-- Follows BMAD PRD structure closely
-
-**BMAD Variant:**
-- 3-4 core sections present
-- Generally follows BMAD patterns but may have structural differences
-- Missing some sections but recognizable as BMAD-style
-
-**Non-Standard:**
-- Fewer than 3 core sections present
-- Does not follow BMAD PRD structure
-- May be completely custom format, legacy format, or from another framework
-
-### 4. Report Format Findings to Validation Report
-
-Append to validation report:
-
-```markdown
-## Format Detection
-
-**PRD Structure:**
-[List all ## Level 2 headers found]
-
-**BMAD Core Sections Present:**
-- Executive Summary: [Present/Missing]
-- Success Criteria: [Present/Missing]
-- Product Scope: [Present/Missing]
-- User Journeys: [Present/Missing]
-- Functional Requirements: [Present/Missing]
-- Non-Functional Requirements: [Present/Missing]
-
-**Format Classification:** [BMAD Standard / BMAD Variant / Non-Standard]
-**Core Sections Present:** [count]/6
-```
-
-### 5. Route Based on Format Classification
-
-**IF format is BMAD Standard or BMAD Variant:**
-
-Display: "**Format Detected:** {classification}
-
-Proceeding to systematic validation checks..."
-
-Without delay, read fully and follow: {nextStepFile} (step-v-03-density-validation.md)
-
-**IF format is Non-Standard (< 3 core sections):**
-
-Display: "**Format Detected:** Non-Standard PRD
-
-This PRD does not follow BMAD standard structure (only {count}/6 core sections present).
-
-You have options:"
-
-Present MENU OPTIONS below for user selection
-
-### 6. Present MENU OPTIONS (Non-Standard PRDs Only)
-
-**[A] Parity Check** - Analyze gaps and estimate effort to reach BMAD PRD parity
-**[B] Validate As-Is** - Proceed with validation using current structure
-**[C] Exit** - Exit validation and review format findings
-
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
-- Only proceed based on user selection
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF A (Parity Check): Read fully and follow: {altStepFile} (step-v-02b-parity-check.md)
-- IF B (Validate As-Is): Display "Proceeding with validation..." then read fully and follow: {nextStepFile}
-- IF C (Exit): Display format findings summary and exit validation
-- IF Any other: help user respond, then redisplay menu
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- All ## Level 2 headers extracted successfully
-- BMAD core sections checked systematically
-- Format classified correctly based on section count
-- Findings reported to validation report
-- BMAD Standard/Variant PRDs proceed directly to next validation step
-- Non-Standard PRDs pause and present options to user
-- User can choose parity check, validate as-is, or exit
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Not extracting all headers before classification
-- Incorrect format classification
-- Not reporting findings to validation report
-- Not pausing for non-standard PRDs
-- Proceeding without user decision for non-standard formats
-
-**Master Rule:** Format detection determines validation path. Non-standard PRDs require user choice before proceeding.