npm - bmad-studio - Versions diffs - 0.1.0 → 0.2.0 - Mend

bmad-studio 0.1.0 → 0.2.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Files changed (1041) hide show

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/bmad-edit-prd/steps-e/step-e-01-discovery.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,242 +0,0 @@
----
-# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
-prdPurpose: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
----
-# Step E-1: Discovery & Understanding
-## STEP GOAL:
-Understand what the user wants to edit in the PRD, detect PRD format/type, check for validation report guidance, and route appropriately.
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-### Universal Rules:
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
-### Role Reinforcement:
-- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
-- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
-- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
-- ✅ You bring analytical expertise and improvement guidance
-- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and edit requirements
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-- 🎯 Focus ONLY on discovering user intent and PRD format
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make any edits yet
-- 💬 Approach: Inquisitive and analytical, understanding before acting
-- 🚪 This is a branch step - may route to legacy conversion
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Discover user's edit requirements
-- 🎯 Auto-detect validation reports in PRD folder (use as guide)
-- 🎯 Load validation report if provided (use as guide)
-- 🎯 Detect PRD format (BMAD/legacy)
-- 🎯 Route appropriately based on format
-- 💾 Document discoveries for next step
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without understanding requirements
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Available context: PRD file to edit, optional validation report, auto-detected validation reports
-- Focus: User intent discovery and format detection only
-- Limits: Don't edit yet, don't validate yet
-- Dependencies: None - this is first edit step
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
-### 1. Load PRD Purpose Standards
-Load and read the complete file at:
-`{prdPurpose}` (data/prd-purpose.md)
-This file defines what makes a great BMAD PRD. Internalize this understanding - it will guide improvement recommendations.
-### 2. Discover PRD to Edit
-"**PRD Edit Workflow**
-Which PRD would you like to edit?
-Please provide the path to the PRD file you want to edit."
-**Wait for user to provide PRD path.**
-### 3. Validate PRD Exists and Load
-Once PRD path is provided:
-- Check if PRD file exists at specified path
-- If not found: "I cannot find a PRD at that path. Please check the path and try again."
-- If found: Load the complete PRD file including frontmatter
-### 4. Check for Existing Validation Report
-**Check if validation report exists in the PRD folder:**
-```bash
-# Look for most recent validation report in the PRD folder
-ls -t {prd_folder_path}/validation-report-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1
-```
-**If validation report found:**
-Display:
-"**📋 Found Validation Report**
-I found a validation report from {validation_date} in the PRD folder.
-This report contains findings from previous validation checks and can help guide our edits to fix known issues.
-**Would you like to:**
-- **[U] Use validation report** - Load it to guide and prioritize edits
-- **[S] Skip** - Proceed with manual edit discovery"
-**Wait for user input.**
-**IF U (Use validation report):**
-- Load the validation report file
-- Extract findings, issues, and improvement suggestions
-- Note: "Validation report loaded - will use it to guide prioritized improvements"
-- Continue to step 5
-**IF S (Skip) or no validation report found:**
-- Note: "Proceeding with manual edit discovery"
-- Continue to step 5
-**If no validation report found:**
-- Note: "No validation report found in PRD folder"
-- Continue to step 5 without asking user
-### 5. Ask About Validation Report
-"**Do you have a validation report to guide edits?**
-If you've run the validation workflow on this PRD, I can use that report to guide improvements and prioritize changes.
-Validation report path (or type 'none'):"
-**Wait for user input.**
-**If validation report path provided:**
-- Load the validation report
-- Extract findings, severity, improvement suggestions
-- Note: "Validation report loaded - will use it to guide prioritized improvements"
-**If no validation report:**
-- Note: "Proceeding with manual edit discovery"
-- Continue to step 6
-### 6. Discover Edit Requirements
-"**What would you like to edit in this PRD?**
-Please describe the changes you want to make. For example:
-- Fix specific issues (information density, implementation leakage, etc.)
-- Add missing sections or content
-- Improve structure and flow
-- Convert to BMAD format (if legacy PRD)
-- General improvements
-- Other changes
-**Describe your edit goals:**"
-**Wait for user to describe their requirements.**
-### 7. Detect PRD Format
-Analyze the loaded PRD:
-**Extract all ## Level 2 headers** from PRD
-**Check for BMAD PRD core sections:**
-1. Executive Summary
-2. Success Criteria
-3. Product Scope
-4. User Journeys
-5. Functional Requirements
-6. Non-Functional Requirements
-**Classify format:**
-- **BMAD Standard:** 5-6 core sections present
-- **BMAD Variant:** 3-4 core sections present, generally follows BMAD patterns
-- **Legacy (Non-Standard):** Fewer than 3 core sections, does not follow BMAD structure
-### 8. Route Based on Format and Context
-**IF validation report provided OR PRD is BMAD Standard/Variant:**
-Display: "**Edit Requirements Understood**
-**PRD Format:** {classification}
-{If validation report: "**Validation Guide:** Yes - will use validation report findings"}
-**Edit Goals:** {summary of user's requirements}
-**Proceeding to deep review and analysis...**"
-Read fully and follow: `./step-e-02-review.md`
-**IF PRD is Legacy (Non-Standard) AND no validation report:**
-Display: "**Format Detected:** Legacy PRD
-This PRD does not follow BMAD standard structure (only {count}/6 core sections present).
-**Your edit goals:** {user's requirements}
-**How would you like to proceed?**"
-Present MENU OPTIONS below for user selection
-### 9. Present MENU OPTIONS (Legacy PRDs Only)
-**[C] Convert to BMAD Format** - Convert PRD to BMAD standard structure, then apply your edits
-**[E] Edit As-Is** - Apply your edits without converting the format
-**[X] Exit** - Exit and review conversion options
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
-- Only proceed based on user selection
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-- IF C (Convert): Read fully and follow: `./step-e-01b-legacy-conversion.md`
-- IF E (Edit As-Is): Display "Proceeding with edits..." then load next step
-- IF X (Exit): Display summary and exit
-- IF Any other: help user, then redisplay menu
----
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-- User's edit requirements clearly understood
-- Auto-detected validation reports loaded and analyzed (when found)
-- Manual validation report loaded and analyzed (if provided)
-- PRD format detected correctly
-- BMAD PRDs proceed directly to review step
-- Legacy PRDs pause and present conversion options
-- User can choose conversion path or edit as-is
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-- Not discovering user's edit requirements
-- Not auto-detecting validation reports in PRD folder
-- Not loading validation report when provided (auto or manual)
-- Missing format detection
-- Not pausing for legacy PRDs without guidance
-- Auto-proceeding without understanding intent
-**Master Rule:** Understand before editing. Detect format early so we can guide users appropriately. Auto-detect and use validation reports for prioritized improvements.

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/bmad-edit-prd/steps-e/step-e-01b-legacy-conversion.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,204 +0,0 @@
----
-# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
-prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
-prdPurpose: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
----
-# Step E-1B: Legacy PRD Conversion Assessment
-## STEP GOAL:
-Analyze legacy PRD against BMAD standards, identify gaps, propose conversion strategy, and let user choose how to proceed.
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-### Universal Rules:
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-### Role Reinforcement:
-- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
-- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
-- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
-- ✅ You bring BMAD standards expertise and conversion guidance
-- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and edit requirements
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-- 🎯 Focus ONLY on conversion assessment and proposal
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to perform conversion yet (that comes in edit step)
-- 💬 Approach: Analytical gap analysis with clear recommendations
-- 🚪 This is a branch step - user chooses conversion path
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Analyze legacy PRD against BMAD standard
-- 💾 Identify gaps and estimate conversion effort
-- 📖 Present conversion options with effort estimates
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user selection
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Available context: Legacy PRD, user's edit requirements, prd-purpose standards
-- Focus: Conversion assessment only (not actual conversion)
-- Limits: Don't convert yet, don't validate yet
-- Dependencies: Step e-01 detected legacy format and routed here
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
-### 1. Attempt Sub-Process Assessment
-**Try to use Task tool with sub-agent:**
-"Perform legacy PRD conversion assessment:
-**Load the PRD and prd-purpose.md**
-**For each BMAD PRD section, analyze:**
-1. Does PRD have this section? (Executive Summary, Success Criteria, Product Scope, User Journeys, Functional Requirements, Non-Functional Requirements)
-2. If present: Is it complete and well-structured?
-3. If missing: What content exists that could migrate to this section?
-4. Effort to create/complete: Minimal / Moderate / Significant
-**Identify:**
-- Core sections present: {count}/6
-- Content gaps in each section
-- Overall conversion effort: Quick / Moderate / Substantial
-- Recommended approach: Full restructuring vs targeted improvements
-Return conversion assessment with gap analysis and effort estimate."
-**Graceful degradation (if no Task tool):**
-- Manually check PRD for each BMAD section
-- Note what's present and what's missing
-- Estimate conversion effort
-- Identify best conversion approach
-### 2. Build Gap Analysis
-**For each BMAD core section:**
-**Executive Summary:**
-- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
-- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
-- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
-**Success Criteria:**
-- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
-- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
-- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
-**Product Scope:**
-- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
-- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
-- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
-**User Journeys:**
-- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
-- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
-- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
-**Functional Requirements:**
-- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
-- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
-- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
-**Non-Functional Requirements:**
-- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
-- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
-- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
-**Overall Assessment:**
-- Sections Present: {count}/6
-- Total Conversion Effort: [Quick/Moderate/Substantial]
-- Recommended: [Full restructuring / Targeted improvements]
-### 3. Present Conversion Assessment
-Display:
-"**Legacy PRD Conversion Assessment**
-**Current PRD Structure:**
-- Core sections present: {count}/6
-{List which sections are present/missing}
-**Gap Analysis:**
-{Present gap analysis table showing each section's status and effort}
-**Overall Conversion Effort:** {effort level}
-**Your Edit Goals:**
-{Reiterate user's stated edit requirements}
-**Recommendation:**
-{Based on effort and user goals, recommend best approach}
-**How would you like to proceed?**"
-### 4. Present MENU OPTIONS
-**[R] Restructure to BMAD** - Full conversion to BMAD format, then apply your edits
-**[I] Targeted Improvements** - Apply your edits to existing structure without restructuring
-**[E] Edit & Restructure** - Do both: convert format AND apply your edits
-**[X] Exit** - Review assessment and decide
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
-- Only proceed based on user selection
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-- IF R (Restructure): Note conversion mode, then load next step
-- IF I (Targeted): Note targeted mode, then load next step
-- IF E (Edit & Restructure): Note both mode, then load next step
-- IF X (Exit): Display summary, exit
-### 5. Document Conversion Strategy
-Store conversion decision for next step:
-- **Conversion mode:** [Full restructuring / Targeted improvements / Both]
-- **Edit requirements:** [user's requirements from step e-01]
-- **Gap analysis:** [summary of gaps identified]
-Display: "**Conversion Strategy Documented**
-Mode: {conversion mode}
-Edit goals: {summary}
-**Proceeding to deep review...**"
-Read fully and follow: `./step-e-02-review.md`
----
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-- All 6 BMAD core sections analyzed for gaps
-- Effort estimates provided for each section
-- Overall conversion effort assessed correctly
-- Clear recommendation provided based on effort and user goals
-- User chooses conversion strategy (restructure/targeted/both)
-- Conversion strategy documented for next step
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-- Not analyzing all 6 core sections
-- Missing effort estimates
-- Not providing clear recommendation
-- Auto-proceeding without user selection
-- Not documenting conversion strategy
-**Master Rule:** Legacy PRDs need conversion assessment so users understand the work involved and can choose the best approach.

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/bmad-edit-prd/steps-e/step-e-02-review.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,245 +0,0 @@
----
-# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
-prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
-validationReport: '{validation_report_path}'  # If provided
-prdPurpose: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
----
-# Step E-2: Deep Review & Analysis
-## STEP GOAL:
-Thoroughly review the existing PRD, analyze validation report findings (if provided), and prepare a detailed change plan before editing.
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-### Universal Rules:
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
-### Role Reinforcement:
-- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
-- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
-- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
-- ✅ You bring analytical expertise and improvement planning
-- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and approval authority
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-- 🎯 Focus ONLY on review and analysis, not editing yet
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make changes to PRD in this step
-- 💬 Approach: Thorough analysis with user confirmation on plan
-- 🚪 This is a middle step - user confirms plan before proceeding
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Load and analyze validation report (if provided)
-- 🎯 Deep review of entire PRD
-- 🎯 Map validation findings to specific sections
-- 🎯 Prepare detailed change plan
-- 💬 Get user confirmation on plan
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed to edit without user approval
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Available context: PRD file, validation report (if provided), user requirements from step e-01
-- Focus: Analysis and planning only (no editing)
-- Limits: Don't change PRD yet, don't validate yet
-- Dependencies: Step e-01 completed - requirements and format known
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
-### 1. Attempt Sub-Process Deep Review
-**Try to use Task tool with sub-agent:**
-"Perform deep PRD review and change planning:
-**Context from step e-01:**
-- User's edit requirements: {user_requirements}
-- PRD format: {BMAD/legacy}
-- Validation report provided: {yes/no}
-- Conversion mode: {restructure/targeted/both} (if legacy)
-**IF validation report provided:**
-1. Extract all findings from validation report
-2. Map findings to specific PRD sections
-3. Prioritize by severity: Critical > Warning > Informational
-4. For each critical issue: identify specific fix needed
-5. For user's manual edit goals: identify where in PRD to apply
-**IF no validation report:**
-1. Read entire PRD thoroughly
-2. Analyze against BMAD standards (from prd-purpose.md)
-3. Identify issues in:
-   - Information density (anti-patterns)
-   - Structure and flow
-   - Completeness (missing sections/content)
-   - Measurability (unmeasurable requirements)
-   - Traceability (broken chains)
-   - Implementation leakage
-4. Map user's edit goals to specific sections
-**Output:**
-- Section-by-section analysis
-- Specific changes needed for each section
-- Prioritized action list
-- Recommended order for applying changes
-Return detailed change plan with section breakdown."
-**Graceful degradation (if no Task tool):**
-- Manually read PRD sections
-- Manually analyze validation report findings (if provided)
-- Build section-by-section change plan
-- Prioritize changes by severity/user goals
-### 2. Build Change Plan
-**Organize by PRD section:**
-**For each section (in order):**
-- **Current State:** Brief description of what exists
-- **Issues Identified:** [List from validation report or manual analysis]
-- **Changes Needed:** [Specific changes required]
-- **Priority:** [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
-- **User Requirements Met:** [Which user edit goals address this section]
-**Include:**
-- Sections to add (if missing)
-- Sections to update (if present but needs work)
-- Content to remove (if incorrect/leakage)
-- Structure changes (if reformatting needed)
-### 3. Prepare Change Plan Summary
-**Summary sections:**
-**Changes by Type:**
-- **Additions:** {count} sections to add
-- **Updates:** {count} sections to update
-- **Removals:** {count} items to remove
-- **Restructuring:** {yes/no} if format conversion needed
-**Priority Distribution:**
-- **Critical:** {count} changes (must fix)
-- **High:** {count} changes (important)
-- **Medium:** {count} changes (nice to have)
-- **Low:** {count} changes (optional)
-**Estimated Effort:**
-[Quick/Moderate/Substantial] based on scope and complexity
-### 4. Present Change Plan to User
-Display:
-"**Deep Review Complete - Change Plan**
-**PRD Analysis:**
-{Brief summary of PRD current state}
-{If validation report provided:}
-**Validation Findings:**
-{count} issues identified: {critical} critical, {warning} warnings
-**Your Edit Requirements:**
-{summary of what user wants to edit}
-**Proposed Change Plan:**
-**By Section:**
-{Present section-by-section breakdown}
-**By Priority:**
-- Critical: {count} items
-- High: {count} items
-- Medium: {count} items
-**Estimated Effort:** {effort level}
-**Questions:**
-1. Does this change plan align with what you had in mind?
-2. Any sections I should add/remove/reprioritize?
-3. Any concerns before I proceed with edits?
-**Review the plan and let me know if you'd like any adjustments.**"
-### 5. Get User Confirmation
-Wait for user to review and provide feedback.
-**If user wants adjustments:**
-- Discuss requested changes
-- Revise change plan accordingly
-- Represent for confirmation
-**If user approves:**
-- Note: "Change plan approved. Proceeding to edit step."
-- Continue to step 6
-### 6. Document Approved Plan
-Store approved change plan for next step:
-- **Approved changes:** Section-by-section list
-- **Priority order:** Sequence to apply changes
-- **User confirmed:** Yes
-Display: "**Change Plan Approved**
-{Brief summary of approved plan}
-**Proceeding to edit step...**"
-Read fully and follow: `./step-e-03-edit.md`
-### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS (If User Wants Discussion)
-**[A] Advanced Elicitation** - Get additional perspectives on change plan
-**[P] Party Mode** - Discuss with team for more ideas
-**[C] Continue to Edit** - Proceed with approved plan
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
-- Only proceed to edit when user selects 'C'
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-- IF A: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill, then return to discussion
-- IF P: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill, then return to discussion
-- IF C: Document approval, then load step-e-03-edit.md
-- IF Any other: discuss, then redisplay menu
----
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-- Validation report findings fully analyzed (if provided)
-- Deep PRD review completed systematically
-- Change plan built section-by-section
-- Changes prioritized by severity/user goals
-- User presented with clear plan
-- User confirms or adjusts plan
-- Approved plan documented for next step
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-- Not analyzing validation report findings (if provided)
-- Superficial review instead of deep analysis
-- Missing section-by-section breakdown
-- Not prioritizing changes
-- Proceeding without user approval
-**Master Rule:** Plan before editing. Thorough analysis ensures we make the right changes in the right order. User approval prevents misalignment.